Cayin Soul 170HA: A Beastly TOTL Vacuum Tube Headphone/Speaker Amplifier wth KT170
May 9, 2024 at 6:20 AM Post #47 of 55
170HA Susvara 01.jpg
170HA Vacuum Tubes.jpg
170HA Front Top Panel.jpg
170HA Front Panel.jpg

Cayin Soul 170HA Transformer-coupled Vacuum Tube Headphone/Speaker Amplifier
Debut at Munich High End 2024, V14/W15 Hall 4

Driver Tubes: Tung-sol 6SN7GTB x2
Output Tubes: Tung-sol KT170 x2
Rectifier Tubes: JJ GZ34S x2

Amplifier: 330 x 400 x 231mm(WxDxH), ~23.3kg
Power Supply: 330 x 363 x 114mm (WxDxH), ~17.2kg
That’s one gorgeous amp! Can’t wait to hear impressions.
 
May 9, 2024 at 6:47 AM Post #48 of 55
@Andykong

what is this?
mmexport1715251602608.jpg
 
May 9, 2024 at 10:04 AM Post #52 of 55
Ah, that's a prototype of our All-in-One transportable, the tentative product code is CA-8 (TBC), we are still fine-tuning the design and finishing, that's why we haven't etched the labels on the front panel. It was meant for the 2025 release, still a long way before I have anything to talk about.
 
Cayin Stay updated on Cayin at their sponsor profile on Head-Fi.
 
http://en.cayin.cn/
May 9, 2024 at 12:19 PM Post #53 of 55
Cayin are you trying to kill me financially and physically if I try and lift that?
 
May 9, 2024 at 12:30 PM Post #54 of 55
Cayin are you trying to kill me financially and physically if I try and lift that?
Well, we did considered that issue! :o2smile:

If we build a 40kg headphones amplifier in one chassis, the risk of hurting our customers is fairly high, so we adopt a two boxes, that should lower the risk significantly. :smile:

The financial consequences is an uncertainty, I suggested a much higher number at brainstorming session but my colleagues vital my suggestion collectively, so the final number turns out to be fairly user-friendly, IMHO.
 
Last edited:
Cayin Stay updated on Cayin at their sponsor profile on Head-Fi.
 
http://en.cayin.cn/
May 9, 2024 at 12:47 PM Post #55 of 55
The financial consequences is an uncertainty, I suggested a much higher number at brainstorming session but my colleagues vital my suggestion collectively, so the final number turns out to be fairly user-friendly, IMHO.
Having been in manufacturing, I normally go in higher, looking at the costs, the return and others most always come in lower and they go with that.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top