- Joined
- Jun 22, 2015
- Posts
- 2,030
- Likes
- 2,830
I have both and use the same MrWalkman configurations on both.I know this is a question thats been asked a thousand times in this forum. Im stuck in the loops between deciding to buy a WM1 but cant decide if I want to settle on the A or bite the bullet on getting a Z despite the steep cost increase. Im stuck on the thought of "is it enough of a difference to justify the increased cost?"
Obviously I know the hardware is definitely better and some people question if they would have bought one, especially after what the software over the years, including Walkman ONE has done to close the gap. But how large actually is the gap after all of this?
how exactly (subjectively) would you describe they are different in sound between both of them?
Im just impatient because my A55 is nearing its end of life after about 4.5 years with the battery showing age, and a recent accident cracking the screen and damaging the jack. And im in an awkward spot finally where i can comfortably afford a WM1A but am just of reach of a WM1Z in good condition that would be reliable and a solid device that would hopefully last me many, many more years. Kinda like a buy one and be done. In about a month or a few weeks if all goes well, i should be able to easily afford one though, i just need to make a decision on what my plans are
Any input would be helpful if its not of annoyance to anybody.
The biggest difference is the 1Z has a much bigger soundstage, deeper and wider. Also the low end extends deeper with better details. However the 1A is no slouch. What it has over the 1Z is a fuller, warmer mid bass and weighs significantly less.
So if you are a basshead, go for the 1A and save some money. Otherwise the 1Z can't be beat and with the right head/earphones and cable can match high end stereo systems when it comes to music enjoyment.