Reviews by suicideup
Kiwi Ears Cadenza Review!
Tagalog Review here:
Good day! After 5 days of casual and critical listening, here’s my written review for the Kiwi Ears Cadenza. Timbre virtuoso!
Disclaimer:
- I don’t read FR graphs. I only use my ears, as how earphones should be used.
- Linsoul and Kiwi Ears sent this unit to me in an exchange for an honest, unbiased review. Rest assured that this review will do its best to devoid from any bias/es as much as possible.
- The following remarks and observations shall be made and owned only by me.
- No monetary compensation is/was involved before, during, and after the period of creation of this review.
- Your mileage may (and always, will) vary.
Source/s used:
- - Hiby R3 Pro Saber
- - Fosi Audio DS1
- - Non-HiFi smartphone (Infinix Note 12 G96), PC.
- - Shanling UA1 Plus
- - Local Files via Foobar, YouTube Music, Deezer, and Qobuz with UAPP
================================================================================================================
Sound signature:
- The Kiwi Ears Cadenza is by far the best IEM under 50 USD in terms of tonal performance. “Neutral”, mild-u-shaped, “harman”, and “balanced” are the main descriptors of the Cadenza, and also lean to a slight warmish tone most of the time.
- The bass on the Cadenza is mildly elevated, fairly controlled, and midbass focus. The bass here is nowhere near basshead levels, but is sufficient for most tracks. The decay leans to the average side in terms of attack and decay. There are times that the bass will sound monotonous and will lack texture, especially on bassy or basshead level tracks, creating a somewhat “soft” character to my hearing perception.
- The mids are mildly recessed and are on the “natural” side in terms of position. There is a presence of midbass bleed here, making the lower mids warm and thicker than usual. Ed Sheeran and Sam Smith’s voices here are thick, smooth, and may lack texture at times in return. Upper mids are mildly elevated and exhibit a good amount of air, clarity, and sparkle. No abnormal harshness or peaks are present on this IEM during my tests, making it very recommendable for those people who have a set of upper frequency-sensitive ears.
- As for the treble, it is “naturally” extended, has decent amount of air and sparkle. It never sounded rolled off nor too extended during my tests. Detail retrieval is average and retrieves most details in a track quite well.
- Technicalities is not the forte of the Kiwi Ears Cadenza. The soundstage is average in terms of depth and height, and wider than taller. Separation and layering is average to below average and it really shows when the tracks get busy. Imaging is average at best as it renders vocal and instrumental positioning decently.
Other IEM comparisons!
VS Kiwi Ears Dolce
- The Dolce edges out the Cadenza in the technicalities, but is less smoother and leans to a drier, brighter side of the spectrum. The Cadenza is also bassier as well.
- Both share the same sound signature, but the Krila is more technically competent. However, it is less warmer and suffers some metallic timbre, making things not smoother when compared to the Cadenza.
- The Pandamon is a more balanced, thicker sounding set that also edges the Cadenza in the technicalities. The Cadenza is a bit airier in the treble department compared to the Pandamon.
- The Simgot EW200 is definitely better in the technicalities than the Cadenza and is on par in terms of timbre to the Cadenza when compared. The EW200 leans slightly to the brighter side of the spectrum and is miles airier when compared to the Cadenza.
Pros:
- Has the best tonal performance under 50USD I have tried.
- Non-fatiguing, smooth yet not too warm sound signature.
- “Natural” timbre.
- Mildly elevated smooth lows.
- Well-placed, open lush mids.
- Non-fatiguing upper frequencies.
- Average technical performance.
- Excellent fit, comfort, and isolation. Definitely one of the most comfortable ones!
- Visually-pleasing build quality (subjective).
- Easy to drive.
- Very good amount of eartips.
- Bass may sound monotonous and may lack texture at times.
- Technicalities are nothing to write home about for its price.
- A case or a pouch would’ve been a great treat for everybody for its asking price (subjective).
================================================================================================================
Verdict
The Kiwi Ears Cadenza sure is the best IEM in my book under 50 USD in terms of timbre! I really enjoyed using these daily during my test periods because it sounds really “rich” and “smooth” on most of my test tracks. Its smooth, musical character suits most of genres and everyday, casual listening. This will be one of my top recommendations if you are looking for the best budge IEM in terms of timbre! Well done Kiwi Ears!
Pairing recommendation/s:
- Source: This sounds just fine when plugged straight to a phone, but is vastly better when used with a proper source. I suggest using a neutral sounding DAC for this one to trim down some warmth.
- Eartips: The eartips are alright and enough for the most part. You may always use your preferred eartips.
- Cable gets the job done and is sufficient for the most part. You may always use your preferred cable.
Non-affiliated product link here!: https://kiwiears.com/products/kiwi-ears-cadenza?variant=42406993297558
Additional Photos Here:
CVJ Nami Review!
(Tagalog Review here: )
Good day! After 5 days of casual and critical listening, here’s my written review for the CVJ Nami. Warm waves!
Disclaimer:
- I don’t read FR graphs. I only use my ears, as how earphones should be used.
- CVJ sent this unit to me in an exchange for an honest, unbiased review. Rest assured that this review will do its best to devoid from any bias/es as much as possible.
- The following remarks and observations shall be made and owned only by me.
- No monetary compensation is/was involved before, during, and after the period of creation of this review.
- Your mileage may (and always, will) vary.
Source/s used:
- -Hiby R3 Pro Saber
- -Fosi Audio DS1
- -Non-HiFi smartphone (Infinix Note 12 G96), PC.
- -Local Files via Foobar, YouTube Music, Deezer, and Qobuz with UAPP.
IEM/Earbud/Setup configuration: stock medium eartips, any form of EQ or MSEB off, 3.5 SE plug, 40-60% volume, low gain and high gain.
Additional note here: I will be reviewing the Nami on its stock configuration first (both switches are on the upper position) then compare it to the other switch configurations later on.
================================================================================================================
Sound signature:
- The CVJ Nami exhibits a fun, warm, mild-v sound signature, and gets warmer the more you experiment with other tuning switch configurations.
- Elevated is the first description of the bass that you’ll describe with the Nami. On stock form, it is punchy, fairly controlled, with average decay on both midbass and subbass. There are times that the overall bass may sound soft or monotonous at some tracks. This may be a deal-breaker to some, but this also equates to a consistent, non-boomy bass quality and quantity. Bassheads on a budget may like this IEM, but may look for extra quantity and elevation on very bassy tracks.
- As for the mids, it is mildly recessed and is warm, due to the presence of some slight midbass bleed, making things lush and thick in the lower mids with a good amount of detail and texture. Upper mids are elevated, with a good amount of clarity, air, and sparkle. There isn’t any unusual sibilance or peaks present here in the CVJ Nami, as long as the track itself isn’t poorly recorded or sibilant to begin with.
- The treble is mildly elevated, extended, with a good amount of air. Sibilance or harshness is absent in this area as well, with average detail retrieval. Trebleheads may find the treble here lacking in brightness, but for most people, this will never sound rolled off, on stock configuration, at least.
- Moving on to the technicalities, it is average to above average during my tests. The soundstage is wide with a good amount of height and depth. Separation is average and may suffer congestion on very busy tracks. Imaging is above average and clearly renders most tracks, and is also sufficient when used while playing competitive games.
“00” config
- The warmest among all the possible configurations. Bass here is more elevated, warm, and a bit slower in attack and decay. Mids are warmer and thicker. Upper frequencies are relaxed and may sound rolled off to some. Soundstage becomes a bit smaller. Separation and layering are also prone to more congestion. Imaging is more or less the same.
- This configuration adds a bit more bass and treble, making things sound more fun and wide than the 00 config. Soundstage becomes wider, separation and imaging are more or less the same compared to its stock config.
- This is more or less the same with the 10 config.
Pros:
- Fun, all rounder, warm sound signature.
- Non-overpowering yet fairly controlled bass.
- Lush, warm mids.
- Non-fatiguing upper frequencies.
- Above-average technical performance for its price (stock config)
- Excellent fit, comfort, and isolation.
- Excellent quality of accessories. Modular cable!
- Versatile, intuitive tuning switches.
- Easy to drive.
- Unique, visually pleasing IEM design (subjective)
- Both switches turn down shows rolled up upper frequencies.
- Bass are quite monotonous to my liking (subjective).
- Technicalities take a hit when both switches are turned down.
- Other switch configurations exhibit negligible sound differences to each other.
- Balanced modular plugs are sold separately (nitpick)
- A pouch or a case would’ve been a good treat for everybody (subjective)
================================================================================================================
Verdict
Verdict
The CVJ Nami is one of the CVJ’s newest IEMs and is somewhat an indicator that the company has changed their tuning styles. Gone are the days wherein they usually make “brighter” IEMs since most of their recent works I have tested lean to a more “mass-friendly”, warm, fun sound signature. With a subjectively pleasing faceplate design, sturdy, modular cable, and easy-to-drive characteristic, I wholeheartedly recommend the CVJ Nami to everyone who just wants a fun, smooth sounding IEM for casual use and music listening sessions. Well done, CVJ!
Pairing recommendation/s:
- Source: This sounds just fine when plugged straight to a phone, but is vastly better when used with a proper source.
- Eartips: The eartips are alright and enough for the most part. You may always use your preferred eartips.
- Cable is really good for its asking price. You may always use your preferred cable.
Non-affiliated product link here!: https://shopee.ph/xj0008.ph?categoryId=100535&entryPoint=ShopByPDP&itemId=22233054695
Additional Photos here:
Kiwi Ears Quartet Review!
Good day! After 5 days of casual and critical listening, here’s my written review for the Kiwi Ears Quartet. Harmony in four!
Disclaimer:
- I don’t read FR graphs. I only use my ears, as how earphones should be used.
- Linsoul and Kiwi Ears sent this unit to me in an exchange for an honest, unbiased review. Rest assured that this review will do its best to devoid from any bias/es as much as possible.
- The following remarks and observations shall be made and owned only by me.
- No monetary compensation is/was involved before, during, and after the period of creation of this review.
- Your mileage may (and always, will) vary.
Burn-in time: 4-8 hours per day, 5 days.
Source/s used:
- -Hiby R3 Pro Saber
- -Fosi Audio DS1
- -Non-HiFi smartphone (Infinix Note 12 G96), PC.
- -Shanling UA1 Plus
- -Local Files via Foobar, YouTube Music, Deezer, and Qobuz with UAPP.
================================================================================================================
Additional note here: I will be reviewing the Quartet on its stock configuration first (both switches are on the upper position) then compare it to the other switch configurations later on.
================================================================================================================
Sound signature:
- The Kiwi Ears Quartet is a bassy, v-shaped sounding unit that leans to the warmer side of the spectrum. It can be a basshead’s delight and is configurable via its tuning switches.
Lows:
- Quartet’s game is its elevated, chunky bass. It is mainly midbass focused, with sufficient and deep subbass rumble to accompany with. Attack and decay are average and can sound sluggish at times, creating a “bloat” into the mids. Despite being a bassy IEM, it is nowhere near compared to the 7Hz Legato’s bass quantity, which may make or break a basshead’s dream. One thing is for sure though: The bass here on the quartet is very versatile and will cater most tracks used with it, in terms of quantity.
Mids:
- The mids are mildly recessed in this configuration, lush, and exhibit some amounts of midbass bleed. This of course translates to thicker, warmer characteristics in the aforementioned region. There are occasions wherein the vocals may sound a bit distant to my liking, particularly on my busy test tracks. Upper mids are definitely forward, with a good amount of definition, clarity, air, and sparkle. When used with the 01 config, peaks may be apparent on some tracks (more into that later). But for the most part, it is fatigue free to my ears during my tests. However, those ears that are sensitive to higher frequencies may look elsewhere aside from this IEM.
Highs:
- Moving on to the treble, it is a little bit elevated but not as elevated as the IEM’s lows. It is decently extended, airy, and fairly detailed. Most microdetails are audible enough on the Quartet, despite not being a “clinically-tuned” set.
Soundstage, Imaging, and separation:
- As for the technical performance, it is average in a nutshell, but could be better in this price point, in my humble opinion. The soundstage is average in terms of width, height, and depth, but never sounded and far from cramped or narrow. Separation is average and will get congested on very busy tracks. Imaging is precise to my liking and can render vocal and instrument positions clearly. It is also precise on most competitive games I used it with.
Tuning switch configurations! (1=up 0=down)
“00” config
- Everything sounds more “balanced” to my ears. Bass and Treble elevations are reduced by a bit. Some may even say that this sounds “relaxed” when personally heard. Mids are less recessed in this configuration. The rest are more or less the same.
- This configuration is my personal favorite as this tames down the bass by a bit and elevates the upper frequencies more, creating a “neutral-bright” sound signature. The bloat and midbass bleed is minimal and at times even gone during my tests, and the technicalities improved significantly. However, this configuration also introduces more upper frequency peaks in exchange for an airier and vocal-forward presentation.
- This sounds warmer compared to the rest of the configurations. Everything sounds more thicker and less airy when compared to the other frequencies.
Pros:
- - All rounder, bassy sound signature on all configurations.
- - Lush, smooth, overall sound quality.
- - Elevated, thick lows on all configurations
- - “Well-placed” mids most of the time.
- - Non-fatiguing upper frequencies.
- - Clear, detailed treble.
- - Average technical performance for its price.
- - Very good separation and detail (01 config).
- - Excellent fit, isolation, and comfort!
- - Smooth yet reliable build quality.
- - Visually pleasing aesthetic! (subjective)
- - Very good amount of accessories!
- - Easy to drive.
- - Versatile, intuitive tuning switches.
Cons:
- - Bass may sound “slow” and may lack texture on some configurations.
- - Vocals may sound distant in some configurations.
- - Upper frequency peaks are present on the 01 config.
- - Technicalities aren't competitive for its asking price (subjective).
- - Cable quality and aesthetic would’ve been better for its asking price (subjective)
- - Case is on the smaller side and will not fit all of the accessories and IEMs itself in one package.
================================================================================================================
Verdict
Among all of the Kiwi Ears IEMs I’ve tried, the Quartet is by far the most “fun” and all rounder in terms of overall sound quality. Its bass, warm, engaging sound characteristic will definitely cater most genres and most ears paired with it. This may not be the first IEM to recommend to everyone, but it sure is one of my recommendations if you want a fun, bassy, versatile sound profiles.
Pairing recommendation/s:
- Source: This sounds just fine when plugged straight to a phone, but is vastly better when used with a proper source.
- Eartips: The eartips are alright and enough for the most part. You may always use your preferred eartips.
- Cable gets the job done, but quite lacks in visual and durability for its asking price, in my opinion. You may always use your preferred cable.
Non-affiliated product link here!: https://kiwiears.com/products/kiwi-ears-quartet
Additional Photos Here:
Letshuoer DZ4 Review!
(Tagalog video review here: https://youtu.be/WJne5zJm3Qk )
Good day! After 5 days of casual and critical listening, here’s my written review for the Letshuoer DZ4. Not from the norm!
================================================================================================================
Disclaimer:
- I don’t read FR graphs. I only use my ears, as how earphones should be used.
- Letshuoer sent this unit to me in an exchange for an honest, unbiased review. Rest assured that this review will do its best to devoid from any bias/es as much as possible.
- The following remarks and observations shall be made and owned only by me.
- No monetary compensation is/was involved before, during, and after the period of creation of this review.
- Your mileage may (and always, will) vary.
================================================================================================================
(Additional note here: I have seen some discussions regarding this IEM’s unusual configuration and its implementation. I have to admit that those discussions are not my forte and will not be the focus of this review. I will review this IEM just like how I usually review my IEMs: hearing them personally and telling everyone what I hear.)
================================================================================================================
Burn-in time: 4-8 hours per day, 5 days.
Source/s used:
- Hiby R3 Pro Saber
- Fosi Audio DS1
- Non-HiFi smartphone (Infinix Note 12 G96), PC.
- Local Files via Foobar, YouTube Music, Deezer, and Qobuz with UAPP.
IEM/Earbud/Setup configuration: stock large eartips, any form of EQ or MSEB off, 3.5 SE plug, 40-60% volume, low gain and high gain.
================================================================================================================
Sound signature:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- The Letshuoer DZ4 exhibits a somewhat “neutral” sound signature, with a noticeably forward mids, which makes it “midcentric” in sound to my ears. This certain sound is one of the unique ones under 100USD in my humble opinion, along with the Truthear Hexa and Celest Pandamon.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lows:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- - The lows here in the DZ4 are fairly controlled, clean, have equal levels of midbass and subbass, and decay quickly. In some instances, the texture may lack and may sound “monotonous” to some. The DZ4 definitely is nowhere near enough for it to be a basshead IEM, but it caters most tracks, particularly the bassy ones quite nicely.
Mids:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- - This is where the highlight of the DZ4 is at - its forward, clean, lively mids.It managed to exhibit a somewhat lush, non-fatiguing timbre while keeping sufficient details during my tests. Lower mids show a good amount of thickness and texture. Some would prefer a thicker approach in this region but I’d say that the thickness of the lower mids of this IEM reminds me of my Etymotic ER3SE. It is close, but not quite because the the mids of the ER3SE sounds more natural and uncolored. Upper mids are forward, showing very good clarity, air, and sparkle. Despite being forward, it never sounded sibilant or harsh to my ears. However, in very rare cases, it may sound “shouty” to some sensitive ears. Overall, I love how the DZ4 presented the mids as it reminds me of a somewhat similar approach just like the Etymotic ER3SE and ER2SE sounded to my ears. But if you prefer the profile of the mids of most recent IEMs at this price, you may find this “odd”.
Highs:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- - As for the treble, it is well extended and has a good amount of presence albeit not being the highlight of the DZ4. It isn’t as airy as what I would prefer, but it doesn’t sound dark to me nor lifeless either. It managed to avoid any form of harshness and sibilance in this area, while showing a very good amount of macro and microdetails for its asking price.
Soundstage, Imaging, and separation:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- - The soundstage is the first thing that I have noticed in this IEM, along with its forward mids. The stage is rather intimate in width with a very good amount of height and depth. The DZ4’s soundstage isn’t compressed nor cramped by any means, and it is comparable to the Truthear Hexa’s soundstage. Layering and separation is average for its price as it is able to render heavy passages neatly most of the time. Imaging is above average in my opinion and leans to the precise side of the spectrum rather than accurate.
Comparisons!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
VS Simgot EA500 (Black nozzle filter)
- - The EA500 is noticeably brighter and more neutral in the mids when compared to the DZ4. With that being said, the EA500 is also more prone to sibilance and peaks unlike the DZ4. Lows are a bit thicker on the DZ4, but the EA500’s bass is cleaner and tighter. Technical performance is better on the EA500.
VS Truthear Hexa
- - The Hexa is better on bass performance, particularly on the quantity. Mids are more upfront on the DZ4 but very negligible unless compared side-by-side.The Hexa has an airier and more extended treble as well. Technical performance is better on the Hexa except for the soundstage as that is the region where the DZ4 and Hexa are more or less the same in terms of width and depth.
VS Celest Pandamon
- - The Celest Pandamon is thicker and more balanced in sound when compared. It has better lows in terms of both quantity and quality while not sacrificing any speed and detail. Mids are a tad bit forward on the DZ4 but the Pandamon has its mids thicker. Treble extension and air of the two IEMs are more or less the same. Technical performance goes to the Pandamon, mainly because of its Square Planar Driver (SPD) and versatile tuning.
VS Simgot EW200
- - The Simgot EW200 is definitely more airy, engaging, spacious, and technically competent when compared. The mids on the DZ4 are more forward compared to the EW200, but the EW200’s mids are more “well-placed”.Highs are definitely brighter on the EW200 and are more prone to sibilance. The soundstage is definitely wider and taller on the EW200. Layering, separation, and imaging are miles better on the ew200.
Pros:
- - Unusual“neutral-midcentric” sound signature.
- - Very good, detailed, forward mids!
- - Controlled, adequately thick lows.
- - Non-fatiguing upper frequencies.
- - Average technical performance.
- - Unique IEM design! (highly subjective)
- - Matte, pseudo-rubbery finish (subjective)
- - Very good fit, comfort, and isolation.
- - Visually-pleasing packaging and accessories!
- - The overall sound may be perceived as “thin/lacks body” to some (but if you are a fan of Etymotic type of sound, it’s alright, more on that later).
- - The stock eartips do not isolate well (highly subjective)
- - Female vocals may sound “too forward” on some tracks.
- - Bass may lack texture at times.
- - Mids may sound “too forward” to some.
- - Soundstage is intimate.
Verdict
It’s quite refreshing to hear a sound like the Letshuoer DZ4 has. While may not be the best in technicalities and timbre for its asking price, what made this IEM stood out or at the very least make this unique among the rest is its forward, lush yet detailed mids which is quite rare in today’s saturated, harman-dominated Chi-Fi market. Do I recommend this IEM? To me, it depends on what type of sound you prefer within the 100 USD range. If you want a mid-forward sounding, non-fatiguing IEM with a quite unique design, consider the Letshuoer DZ4 as one of your choices!
Pairing recommendation/s:
- Source: This sounds just fine when plugged straight to a phone, but is vastly better when used with a proper source.
- Eartips: The eartips are alright and enough for the most part. However, it did not fit my ears well. You may always use your preferred eartips. I find the KBEAR 07 eartips work well with this IEM.
- Cable is really good, and robust. You may always use your preferred cable.
Non-affiliated product link here!: https://letshuoer.net/products/lets...ngle-passive-radiator-edc-hifi-in-ear-monitor
Additional Photos Here:
KZ Krila Review!
(Tagalog Review Here: )
Good day! After 5 days of casual and critical listening, here’s my written review for the KZ Krila. Quite ambitious!
Disclaimer:
- I don’t read FR graphs. I only use my ears, as how earphones should be used.
- KZ sent this unit to me in an exchange for an honest, unbiased review. Rest assured that this review will do its best to devoid from any bias/es as much as possible.
- The following remarks and observations shall be made and owned only by me.
- No monetary compensation is/was involved before, during, and after the period of creation of this review.
- Your mileage may (and always, will) vary.
Burn-in time: 4-8 hours per day, 5 days.
Source/s used:
- Hiby R3 Pro Saber
- Fosi Audio DS1
- Non-HiFi smartphone (Infinix Note 12 G96), PC.
- Local Files via Foobar, YouTube Music, Deezer, and Qobuz with UAPP.
================================================================================================================
Sound signature:- Compared to the D-Fi, the KZ Krila is a mildly warm, v/u-shaped sounding IEM. It nearly exhibits all the same characteristics as what the D-Fi has, but it is a bit airier.
- The bass here in the Krila is mildly elevated, and midbass focused, which translates to a punchy, clean bass. Attack and decay of the low frequencies of this set is quite fast and may lack on that area on some genres. This is by no means a basshead set, but the bass on the Krila is capable of handling bassy genres such as EDM, hip-hop, or pop.
- The mids are mildly recessed, but it is quite clean and never got drowned in terms of presence during my tests. This also translates to its technical performance, more onto that later. Lower mids exhibit average thickness and texture. Upper mids are elevated, airy, sparkly, and clear. Peaks and mild sibilance are ever so present here, particularly on very busy tracks. With that being said, people with ears that are sensitive to elevated and present upper frequencies may avoid this one.
- The treble is lively, light, and dazzling, with a few instances of small peaks. BA Timbre is present on this IEM, which aids in the retrieval of this IEM's details. The quiet laughing voice on Toto's "Africa," the ticking clock on the MCR's "Welcome to the Black Parade," and many more subtleties are easily heard. Still, just like its upper mids, the peaks are apparent on sibilant prone tracks and may not be everyone's cup of tea.
- In terms of technical performance, this isn't a "kilobuck killer" or "kilobuck level" performance, but it is above average and comparable to what you'd hear on IEMs under $60 USD. The soundstage is average, with plenty of height and depth. Separation is average-mild average, with little to no congestion on really busy passages. Imaging is above average in my opinion and truly shines in gaming, especially when detecting the footsteps or position of nuances in music and games.
- UUUU (Stock) - Everything becomes more airy and wide. Mids are more open and engaging. BA Timbre and peaks are apparent.
- DDDD - This sounds like the D-Fi on the same configuration. The peaks are now absent on this config but the added boost to the treble and technicalities are gone as well. It is more “neutral” than the stock config though.
- DDDU - The upper frequencies are boosted and the overall sound sounded too lean to my liking. It is wider in terms of soundstage but lacks the overall note weight.
- UUUD - Everything sounds warm on this set, minus the BA timbre. Peaks are still apparent.
VS Kiwi Ears Dolce
- The Dolce is a drier, brighter sounding IEM. It doesn’t have the BA timbre, that’s for sure, but it does have the “sizzly” upper frequencies due to LCP’s natural characteristic. Both excel at the technical performance, but the KZ excels more on the bass department, while the Dolce excels on the separation, imaging, and layering.
- The KE-S is a warmer, “safer” less technical set. It does have the smoothness, the thickness, and the warmth but it doesn’t have the technical performance and airiness that the Krila has.
- To put things simply, the Krila sounds like the D-Fi but is airier and a bit better on the overall technicalities.
- The Simgot EW200 is a more airy, cohesive, clean, “neutral” sounding set. The Krila can trade blows on technical performance, but the EW200 still is the winner due to its overall refined sound without sacrificing its presence of upper frequencies.
- They are literally miles apart, both in technical and tonal performance. The kilobuck IEMs are definitely better.
================================================================================================================
Pros:- All-rounder, fun sound signature.
- The most “technical” sounding IEM you can get under 20 USD, next to the Tanchjim Zero.
- Inherits the overall sound quality of the D-Fi, but cheaper.
- Fairly controlled bass.
- Clean, fast low frequencies in terms of attack and decay.
- Open, “well-placed” mids.
- Airy, bright treble (subjective).
- Above-average technical performance for its price.
- Very good fit, comfort, and isolation
- Very good build quality.
- Easy to drive.
- Scales well on different pairings.
- Intuitive tuning switches.
- BA Timbre is very present in stock tuning configuration.
- Peaks on upper frequencies are mildly present on sibilant prone tracks.
- This isn’t a “kilobuck” killer in terms of sound quality, contrary to what the brand claims.
- Accessories are very minimal; a pouch or a cable winder would’ve been a good treat to everybody (subjective).
================================================================================================================
Verdict
The KZ Krila is definitely an upgrade to last month’s KZ D-Fi in terms of technical performance and upper frequency refinement. As for the million (or a thousand dollar) question, is it really a “kilobuck killer”? To me it is a resounding no, even when compared to the older, higher priced IEMs like the QDC Anole VX, Campfire Audio Andromeda, Ara, Solaris, and even the InEar Prophile 8 (not sure if this is a flagship IEM but you get the point), particularly on the technical performance. The aforementioned sets are miles better, even from an objective standpoint compared to the Krila. Does this mean that the Krila is an underperforming IEM? Definitely not, as this IEM can trade blows or be on par along with the IEMs under 60USD in terms of overall sound quality. I’ll still recommend this IEM to everyone who wants a very good, capable sounding IEM under 20USD. Well done KZ!
Pairing recommendation/s:
- Source: This sounds just fine when plugged straight to a phone, but is vastly better when used with a proper source. I prefer using a warm source on this one to minimize the BA Timbre.
- Eartips: The eartips are alright but I suggest using softer eartips for this one.
- Cable is good, and does its job, albeit basic. You may always use your preferred cable.
Non-affiliated product link here!: https://shopee.ph/KZ-Krila-1BA-1DD-...port-Gaming-headphone-i.345922933.22847252871
Additional Photos Here:
thejoker13
No, absolutely not. The ew200 is leaps and bounds better with staging and imaging. They aren't even in the same conversation as the Krila
Queen Of Audio Vesper 2 Review!
Good day! After 5 days of casual and critical listening, here’s my written review for the Queen of Audio Vesper 2. Mellow evening star!
- I don’t read and read FR graphs. I only use my ears, as how earphones should be used.
- Queen Of Audio/Kinera sent this unit to me in an exchange for an honest, unbiased review. Rest assured that this review will do its best to devoid from any bias/es as much as possible.
- The following remarks and observations shall be made and owned only by me.
- No monetary compensation is/was involved before, during, and after the period of creation of this review.
- Your mileage may (and always, will) vary.
Burn-in time: 4-8 hours per day, 5 days.
Source/s used:
- - Hiby R3 Pro Saber
- - Fosi Audio DS1
- - Non-HiFi smartphone (Infinix Note 12 G96), PC.
- - Local Files via Foobar, YouTube Music, Deezer, and Qobuz with UAPP.
================================================================================================================
Sound signature:- In a nutshell, the QOA Vesper 2 is a warm-u-ushaped sounding IEM. It can be perceived as “neutral” or “neutral-warm” “neutral with a bass boost” or “balanced-warm" by some people. It is non fatiguing, relaxed sound will cater most genres easily.
- Controlled, mildly elevated is the name of the game of the Vesper 2. It is mostly midbass-dominant and is slightly slow in terms of attack and decay. Unlike most IEMs in this price point, its midbass punch is quite chunky and will be beneficial or good in bassy, pop, or EDM genres. Still, this isn’t the bassheads dream type of IEM, but will be sufficient or even more than enough to most listeners.
- The mids are mostly natural in terms of sound and presence most of the time, with some slight recession during my tests on some specific tracks, making it a bit warm-u shaped to my ears. Lower mids are thick, lush, smooth, with some midbass bleed, making things warm. Upper mids are mildly elevated, with enough amount of clarity, some air, and sparkle. This region never sounded harsh and/or sibilant during my tests, and will favor those people who do not want bright sounding upper frequencies. Overall, the mids of the Vesper 2 sounds “smooth” and will be called “organic” by some people.
- Moving on to the treble, it is present enough, has good clarity, but lacks a bit of extension and air to my lacking. Some people may perceive this region as “dark sounding” or “rolled off” but this isn’t the case when the Vesper 2 is paired with a fairly powerful source, such as a Jcally JM10 Pro, Ibasso DC05, Shanling UA2, or Fosi DS1. For most people, the extension and air will be enough, but for us hobbyists it may lack and not too detailed, which leads us to its technicalities:
- Due to its not-so-extended treble response, it quite affected the soundstage width and may sound intimate most of the time. It isn’t cramped or narrow by any means, but it definitely is “in your head”, so to speak. Separation and layering is average to below average and may experience some congestion on very heavy passages. Imaging is accurate most of the time and will render vocal and instrument positions fairly precisely.
VS QOA Vesper
- The Vesper is a more energetic, bassy, v-shaped older sibling.The Vesper 2 is less warm and more “natural-sounding” when compared. The Vesper has better detail retrieval when compared, but is definitely negligible because you’ll only hear the difference when used side-by-side. The bass is more elevated on the Vesper, but is surprisingly chunkier on the Vesper 2. The treble is also brighter on the Vesper. As for the technicalities, they are more or less the same, but the Vesper 2 edges the original Vesper slightly on the layering and separation on some tracks.
- The Celest is a more balanced, technical set. Its attack and decay speeds are better and faster compared to the Vesper 2, due to its SPD config. Their treble extensions are more or less the same, but the Vesper 2 has a bit more air. In a nutshell, the Vesper 2 focuses more on the musicality, while the Pandamon does its best balancing both musicality and technicalities very well.
- Both sets are warm sounding, non fatiguing, and masters overall craftsmanship. The HE10 is a bit harder to drive compared to the Vesper 2, but scales well the more it is paired with power. It is also more u-shaped and less thicker sounding. Soundstage is a bit wider on the HE10, but the Vesper 2 is better on the layering. Again, both sets are non-fatiguing, but to my ears, the HE10 extends better on the treble compared to the Vesper 2.
- The Simgot EW200, just like the Pandamon, did its best to balance both technical and tonal performance, but this time, in a fun, all rounder, airier manner. Everything sounds so engaging, well-extended, clean, wide, and pseudo-immersive, if you may. It is a more u-shaped sounding set compared to the Vesper 2.
Pros:
- All-rounder, non-fatiguing sound signature.
- A very good upgrade of the original Vesper in terms of the overall timbre.
- Warm, smooth sound.
- Thick, fairly controlled bass.
- Lush, warm mids.
- Non-fatiguing treble.
- Very “natural” timbre.
- Average technical performance.
- Excellent fit, comfort, and isolation.
- Excellent overall visual aesthetic!
- Excellent packaging and accessories!
- Slight midbass bleed is present during my tests.
- Needs at least 2vrms of power to sound better (subjective).
- Treble lacks extension to my liking, and can be perceived as “dark” by some people (subjective).
- Stage is rather intimate.
- Does not compete that well for its asking price (highly subjective).
- Cable is a bit on the stiffer side to my liking (subjective).
================================================================================================================
Verdict
To me, the Queen Of Audio Vesper 2 is a worthy upgrade from the original Vesper, in terms of tonal performance. It is definitely more balanced, coherent, slightly better in the technical department, while keeping the signature thick sound of the older sibling. This type of sound is quite rare and does not aim to compete in today’s market, in my humble opinion. Instead, to me it is created to cater to a specific number of people, specifically those people who want a non-fatiguing, laid back, warm, musical, thick sound. If that’s the case, the Vesper 2 is for you!Verdict
Pairing recommendation/s:
- Source: This sounds just fine when plugged straight to a phone, but is vastly better when used with a proper source. I prefer using a neutral source on this one.
- Eartips: The eartips are alright but I suggest using softer eartips for this one.
- Cable is good, and does its job. It is a bit stiffer to my liking, but you do you. You may use your preferred cable.
Non-affiliated product link here!: https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005005714459546.html?spm=a2g0s.imconversation.0.0.7ccc3e5fnH8bTf
Additional Photos Here:
hokagoteatimereviews
They look so good!
Thanks for the great review.
Thanks for the great review.
Whizzer HE10 Review!
Good day! After 5 days of casual and critical listening, here’s my written review for the Whizzer Kylin HE10. Whizzer the Rizzler!
Disclaimer:
- I don’t read and read FR graphs. I only use my ears, as how earphones should be used.
- Whizzer sent this unit to me in an exchange for an honest, unbiased review. Rest assured that this review will do its best to devoid from any bias/es as much as possible.
- The following remarks and observations shall be made and owned only by me.
- No monetary compensation is/was involved before, during, and after the period of creation of this review.
- Your mileage may (and always, will) vary.
Burn-in time: 4-8 hours per day, 5 days.
Source/s used:
- Hiby R3 Pro Saber
- Fosi Audio DS1
- Non-HiFi smartphone (Infinix Note 12 G96), PC.
- Local Files via Foobar, YouTube Music, Deezer, and Qobuz with UAPP.
================================================================================================================
Sound signature:- The Whizzer Kylin HE10 follows the KAI target - which basically is a modified Harman Target by the company. As a result, the HE10 will sound warm, balanced-warm, fun-sounding, v/u-shaped at most, depending on the source paired and hearing perception you have.
- The lows are substantially elevated, a bit subbass dominant, and thick. Attack and decay leans to the natural side, which means that this isn’t too clean and too boomy at the same time. There is still some texture to it, preventing me from calling it “monotonous”. Bassheads may not find the bass on the HE10 as chunky or hard hitting as what the 7HzLegato has, but it sure is fun and enjoyable on most bassy tracks used with it.
- The mids are also on the natural side, and suffer a bit of slight midbass bleed, keeping things warm, smooth, lush, and thick. Lower midrange sounds thick, lush, and smooth without any instances of recession perceived, even on busy tracks. Upper mids are mildly elevated, with a good amount of clarity, air, and sparkle. Those people with sensitive ears will enjoy the HE10 due to its fatigue-free sound as this never sounded sibilant or even peaky on my tests.
- Moving to the highs, it is there, present, adequately extended, but will sound “lacking” or “relaxed” in terms of extension. Treble aficionados will find these lacking, but for the majority of people in this hobby, and even to those who are just “passing by” in this hobby, this will be enough for most genres you throw at it. Detail retrieval is average as it can render the primary details existing in the played track.
- As for the technicalities, it isn’t the strongest suit of the HE10. It does the job well and justified for its asking price, but nothing new to write home about. The soundstage is on the average side in terms of width, height and depth. It is more on the “natural” type as well and does not have that wide effect just like what you hear on open back headphones or some IEMs within this price. Separation and layering are average and may experience some slight congestion on some busy tracks. Imaging is also average and is able to render some spaces and position between the vocals and instruments.
================================================================================================================
Comparisons!VS Simgot EA500
- The Simgot EA500 is a brighter, more bass-light set while the HE10 is the complete opposite. The EA500 has better overall technical performance when compared, but the HE10 has the “natural” sound.
- The Simgot EW200 is better in almost everything compared to the HE10, except for the packaging. The EW200 is cheaper though. The HE10 is a warmer sounding IEM and is also more safe compared to the EW200.
- The Pandamon sounds more balanced and technical compared to the HE10. Its overall technical performance are also better compared to the HE10. Both may be perceived as “airless” in terms of the treble extension, but the Pandamon pulls and renders more detail on the top end.
- The PR2 is harder to drive since it is a planar IEM and leans to a more “fun yet controlled” sound and may sometimes come across “too clean”. The HE10 sounds more natural and less technical.
- In a nutshell, all of these IEMs are inspired by the Harman Target. The HE10 is warmer compared to these IEMs, and slightly excels on the separation and layering and naturalness of the mids.
Pros:
- A master of overall mass appeal under 100 USD!
- All-rounder, fatigue-free sound signature.
- Very good tonal performance.
- Elevated yet composed bass response.
- Lush, smooth, warm midrange.
- Non-fatiguing upper frequencies.
- Average technical performance.
- Excellent build quality. All metal, smooth edged IEM under 100USD!
- Excellent quality and quantity of accessories. 3 sets of eartips!
- Excellent fit, comfort and isolation.
- Excellent packaging craftsmanship. This sure is visually pleasing!
- Easy to drive to its full potential.
- The overall sound isn’t bad by any means, but it is somewhat redundant compared to the recent IEMs that exist under 100USD (could be a good or a bad thing, your call).
- The treble can be perceived as “too safe” by some ears (subjective).
VERDICT
The Whizzer HE10 overall is a well-crafted IEM under 100 USD, in terms of packaging, build quality, and sound. Despite not being the “best” sounding IEM in my book, It managed to sound really good and pleasing for most people who have tested this unit sent to me, including myself. Having the Harman Target as a reference for a tuning of an IEM is a double edged sword - it will be liked or maybe even loved by most people, but will be “redundant” to some people who have the same similar sounding IEM in their collection. Nevertheless, I will still wholeheartedly recommend this IEM to anyone who just wants a bit of everything under 100USD. A safe, very good recommendation indeed!
Pairing recommendation/s:- Source: This sounds just fine when plugged straight to a phone, but is vastly better when used with a proper source.
- Eartips: The eartips are more than enough and fits most ears well. However, you may use your preferred eartips.
- Cable is really, really good. Probably the best stock cable of an IEM you can get with this price, just like what you would get with the Simgot EW200. It is subjective though.
Non-affiliated link here!: https://whizzer.store/product/whizzer-kylin-he10-2/
Additional Photos Here:
innovated
Thanks for the review and the effort involved!
The Kylin looks majestic, definitely a design success and the cable is very tasteful. Wouldn't be a "buy" for me, but I would buy as a gift for loved ones - the total package looks great, elegant and "valuable" - and the perhaps overly safe tuning helps for that purpose, especially for loved ones still using £5 Samsung ears!
The Kylin looks majestic, definitely a design success and the cable is very tasteful. Wouldn't be a "buy" for me, but I would buy as a gift for loved ones - the total package looks great, elegant and "valuable" - and the perhaps overly safe tuning helps for that purpose, especially for loved ones still using £5 Samsung ears!
Kiwi Ears Dolce Review!
Good day! After 5 days of casual and critical listening, here’s my written review for the Kiwi Ears Dolce. A sweet budget contender!
Disclaimer:
- I don’t read and read FR graphs. I only use my ears, as how earphones should be used.
- Kiwi Ears sent this unit to me in an exchange for an honest, unbiased review. Rest assured that this review will do its best to devoid from any bias/es as much as possible.
- The following remarks and observations shall be made and owned only by me.
- No monetary compensation is/was involved before, during, and after the period of creation of this review.
- Your mileage may (and always, will) vary.
Burn-in time: 4-8 hours per day, 5 days.
Source/s used:
- Hiby R3 Pro Saber
- Fosi Audio DS1
- Non-HiFi smartphone (Infinix Note 12 G96), PC.
- Local Files via Foobar, YouTube Music, Deezer, and Qobuz with UAPP.
================================================================================================================
Sound signature:- The Kiwi Ears Dolce sports a mild-v/w-shaped leaning towards bright sound signature. It may also be perceived as a neutral-bright sounding IEM on some sources, due to its firm, controlled bass.The Dolce sports the redeeming qualities that exist on an LCP driver, namely is very good detail technical performance and controlled, clear lows.
- The lows are mildly elevated and not as elevated compared to its upper frequencies. Being a punchy, midbass-dominant set, the Dolce delivers a clean, feet tapping bass response albeit not being a basshead’s dream. In addition to these characteristics, the attack and decay is quite fast, or faster than average.
- The mids are quite interesting to my ears, in a good way. The vocals are more forward than the instruments, offering a sense of intimacy. Lower mids do not exhibit any added thickness due to virtually zero midbass bleed presence during my tests. Upper mids are definitely elevated and exhibit a very good amount of clarity, air, and sparkle. It is leaning towards the bright side of the spectrum, and peaks, and mild sibilance are present on very sibilant prone tracks. For an average set of ears, this isn’t really a big problem as these don't linger too much or too long on most tracks, but for those people who are sensitive to upper frequencies, this may be a reason for you to skip this set.
- Bright and elevated are some of the overarching characteristics of the treble of the Kiwi Ears Dolce. It is definitely present, sparkly, and airy. Cymbal crashes are satisfying and do not pierce. Detail retrieval is above-average to my ears compared to the sets you usually find under 30USD, as the Dolce can pick up most details and nuances in a track.
- In a nutshell, the Dolce exhibits an above average quality under 30-50USD. The soundstage is average, offering a wider than deep characteristic, with a good amount of height, but never “out of your head” experience. Separation and layering are above average to me in this price point as it can handle busy passages fairly easily. Imaging is average, accurate at best. It renders vocal and instrument position accurate.
Comparisons!
VS Tangzu Wan’er SG
- The Wan’er is a smoother, laid-back, thicker, neutral-ish warm-sounding set. The Dolce is the opposite of that. In return, the Dolce renders more detail and is quite better at the separation and layering department when compared.
- The KE-S is a warmer, smooth, lush, thicker sounding IEM. It is also inferior in technicalities compared to the Dolce. Dolce is definitely brighter and cleaner.
- The D-Fi is more " neutral" and less energetic when compared to the Dolce. It is also less brighter as well. Both share the same technical performance. Peaks are least heard on the D-Fi. Dolce is cleaner in terms of overall sound.
================================================================================================================
Pros:
- All rounder, energetic, bright sound signature (subjective).
- Exhibits excellent qualities of an LCP-based driver.
- Punchy, well-controlled bass response for its price.
- Bleed-free, detailed mids.
- Forward, airy vocals.
- Extended, detailed treble.
- Above average technical performance for its price (subjective).
- Cool gradient faceplate design! (subjective).
- Very good fit, comfort and isolation.
- Easy to drive.
- Overall clean sound quality.
- This will be perceived as “too bright” to some ears.
- Subbass extension may be lacking to some (subjective).
- Instances of mild sibilance and upper mids peak are present on very sibilant tracks.
- A pouch or a cable winder would’ve been a great treat to anybody in this price point.
Verdict
Despite being tuned as an “all rounder” IEM, the Kiwi Ears Dolce is quite different from the norm due to its forward, lively vocals and somewhat “bright” take for a mild-v/w-shaped IEM . Exhibiting the remarkable characteristics of an LCP driver, the Kiwi Ears Dolce automatically hits the sound I prefer under 30 USD. This IEM sure is quite different and interesting compared to the IEMs you see within this price point. If you are looking for a bright, vocal-forward sounding IEM with a very good technical performance, consider the Dolce as one of the possible choices under 30 USD. The gradient faceplate also stands out among this price range!
Pairing recommendation/s:
- Source: This sounds just fine when plugged straight to a phone, but is vastly better when used with a proper source. I prefer using a warmer source on this one.
- Eartips: The eartips are alright but I suggest using softer eartips for this one.
- Cable is good, soft, and does its job. You may use your preferred cable.
Non-affiliated product link here!: https://www.linsoul.com/products/kiwi-ears-dolce
Additional Photos Here:
Attachments
SIMGOT EW200 Review!
Good day! After 5 days of casual and critical listening, here’s my written review for the Simgot EW200. Simgot’s recent second IEM, going through the right path!
Video review here:
Disclaimer:
- I don’t read and read FR graphs. I only use my ears, as how earphones should be used.
- Simgot sent this unit to me in an exchange for an honest, unbiased review. Rest assured that this review will do its best to devoid from any bias/es as much as possible.
- The following remarks and observations shall be made and owned only by me.
- No monetary compensation is/was involved before, during, and after the period of creation of this review.
- Your mileage may (and always, will) vary.
Burn-in time: 4-8 hours per day, 5 days.
Source/s used:
- Hiby R3 Pro Saber
- Fosi Audio DS1
- Non-HiFi smartphone (Infinix Note 12 G96), PC.
- Local Files via Foobar, YouTube Music, Deezer, and Qobuz with UAPP.
================================================================================================================
Sound signature:- In a nutshell, the Simgot EW200 is a balanced or mild-U-shaped sounding IEM. What makes this IEM stand out among the other IEMs under the 50 USD category is it managed to balance tonal and technical performance so well that it never sounded “lacking” most of the time.
- The lows are moderately elevated, rich, full, and textured. Both midbass and sub bass seem to exhibit a good amount of quantity with a bit of subbass dominance. Decay and attack is also within the average-above average realm, resulting in a clean yet non-lacking presentation. This is by no means a bass-centric, basshead IEM, but it caters most bassy and even bass heavy IEMs while never sounding lacking or muted during my tests.
- Despite not being a midcentric IEM, the EW200’s mids is the highlight of this IEM to me, along with its technicalities (more into that later). The mids managed to sound musical and technical at the same time. Call it “natural”, if you may. It is open, engaging, and never sounded drowned or muted at all. Lower mids exhibit good depth, thickness and texture, while the upper mids are slightly elevated while being clear, airy and sparkly at the same time. There aren’t any harshness or sibilance encountered in this IEM, but I would still like to give a friendly reminder to those people who are sensitive to elevated upper frequencies that they may find this IEM “bright” on some occasions.
- The highs are elevated but well tuned enough to avoid any form of harshness, pierce and peaks. It is airy and renders higher notes very well. Detail retrieval is average-above-average as it renders most details easily.
- For under 50 USD, the technical performance that the EW200 offers is quite insane, in my opinion. The soundstage is wide with a really good amount of height and depth, making this sound quite “immersive”. Separation and layering is average-above average and will handle busy tracks fairly easily. Imaging is precise and definitely can render accurate vocal and instrumental positions.
Comparisons!
VS Simgot EA500
- The Simgot EA500 is a brighter, more bass-light set when compared to the EW200. The key difference between the two is that the EA500 has a replaceable tuning nozzle and will definitely affect the sound (but for this comparison we’ll go with the black nozzle filters). With the black nozzle filter on the EA500, the EA500 sounds more neutral, bright, and excels more on the layering and separation, but the EW200 excels more on the soundstage, width, height, and depth. To my surprise, the EW200’s hurdle that is holding it back to sound exactly like the EA500 is that the EA500 is more refined and cleaner than the latter. Nevertheless, both IEMs are really good performers for their respective prices.
- The Pandamon is still one of my favorite sets under 100 USD and still shows that it isn’t that left behind when compared to the EW200. The Pandamon aims for a more “balanced”, controlled, bodied approach while the EW200 aims for a more lively, airy, open sound. Hearing the Pandamon and EW200 side-by-side showed that the Pandamon lacked air and treble extension but not to the point that it sounded muted. It just lacks treble extension compared to the EW200 in terms of “openness”. The Pandamon slightly excels on the separation and layering. Both scales well with different sources. Both are very good choices, you just have to pick what you prefer.
- The PR2 is harder to drive since it is a planar IEM and leans to a more “fun yet controlled” sound and may sometimes come across “too clean”. The EW200 is like that but less controlled in a good way, keeping things “alive”. Mids are definitely more open and engaging on the EW200. The PR2 excels on the layering but the EW200 isn’t that far and is still very competent when compared to a planar.
- Both are technically capable IEMs, but the EW200 isn’t that far in terms of quality. The only thing that is apart is their respective prices, which means that the EW200 has better value. It also does not have the BA Timbre that the TA4 has.
- The D-Fi aims for a more neutral and a tad bit brighter approach while the EW200 maintains its tonal and technical balance. The EW200 also has better overall technicalities than the D-Fi when compared.
- In a nutshell, all of these IEMs are inspired by the Harman Target - but the Simgot EW200 does things better by balancing both technical and tonal performance for its price while not sounding mellow, intimate, and haywired on busy tracks like the latter.
Pros:
- The current “best” IEM under 50 USD IEM I have heard recently (highly subjective).
- Has the best balanced tonal and technical performance under 50 USD.
- Almost-harman-sounding IEM but improved to sound better than the usual.
- All-rounder, versatile sound signature.
- Controlled, detailed yet non-lacking bass.
- Open, airy, detailed mids.
- Non-fatiguing upper frequencies.
- Very good, above-average technicalities for its price.
- Insane stage height and depth in its caliber.
- Very good build quality. Metal IEM shells!
- Excellent fit, comfort and isolation.
- Very good cable quality.
- Easy to be driven to its full potential.
- Scales well to different sources.
- Eartips might not fit well to most people’s ears. (subjective).
- IEM shells are smudge, scratch, and fingerprint magnet.
Verdict
The current state of Simgot’s target house sound proves that any company can still live by the book while improving what needs to be improved to stand out. Followed by the EA500’s hype train, the Simgot EW200 also deserves the hype if it will be hyped, due to its outstanding tonal and technical performance under 50 USD, in my own humble opinion. I can even say that this IEM can be a no-brainer recommendation for those people who just wants an IEM that just sounds good and great under 50 USD. As what some of my friends say, “Simgoat” indeed! Keep ‘em rolling!
Pairing recommendation/s:
- Source: This sounds just fine when plugged straight to a phone, but is vastly better when used with a proper source.
- Eartips: The eartips did not fit my ears that deep, so it may differ to your ears. However, this does not affected the sound quality too much. You may still use your preferred eartips.
- Cable is really, really good. Probably the best stock cable of an IEM you can get with this price. You may still use your preferred cables.
Non-affiliate link here: http://www.simgot.com/en/products/d...H_0vcA9cz9Peg1ubAKLUmsSuxj_Wm4FRnIyE5FSOKWYBE
Additional Photos Here:
KZ AS24 Review!
Good day! After 5 days of casual and critical listening, here’s my written review for the KZ AS24. KZ’s under 150 USD technical take!
Disclaimer:
- I don’t read and read FR graphs. I only use my ears, as how earphones should be used.
- KZ sent this unit to me in an exchange for an honest, unbiased review. Rest assured that this review will do its best to devoid from any bias/es as much as possible.
- The following remarks and observations shall be made and owned only by me.
- No monetary compensation is/was involved before, during, and after the period of creation of this review.
- Your mileage may (and always, will) vary.
Source/s used:
- - Hiby R3 Pro Saber
- - Fosi Audio DS1
- - Non-HiFi smartphone (Infinix Note 12 G96), PC.
- - Local Files via Foobar, YouTube Music, Deezer, and Qobuz with UAPP.
=====================================================================================================
Additional Note: I’ll be reviewing the AS24 first on its stock form (0000/0000) then base the differences of switch alterations from there.
Sound signature:
- The KZ AS24 in its stock form is currently the most neutral, clean-sounding KZ I have heard, with some slight biases towards presence, but not too bright. This is also the most technical sounding KZ IEM and is one of the best IEM in terms of technical performance in its price category, in my book.
- The lows are definitely clean, controlled, well balanced and never lacked for neutral aficionados. It never bled or smeared to the other frequencies. It is a bit midbass dominant but is definitely bodied or thick sounding to my ears.This will never be a bassheads’ dream IEM, but its bass is somewhat sufficient for bassy or EDM tracks, especially when you cranked up the switches (more into that later).
Mids:
- With the lows behaving and “ballin controllably”, the mids never suffered any form of warmth, bleed, or bloat when paired with a neutral source. However, I do find that pairing it with a warm source adds a bit of the warmth to the lower mids, making things more lush without sacrificing any detail. Male vocals, and the instruments present in this region exhibit good thickness and texture despite this IEM being an all-BA driver set. Moving on to the upper mids, it is mildly elevated than neutral, airy, sparkly, and has an above average amount of presence. In a nutshell, there isn’t really any harshness present on this IEM. However, slight peaks will be apparent depending on the track and source paired with it.
- To me, this area isn’t that much elevated, but it may be perceived like so due to its controlled lower frequencies. However, it is well extended, airy and detailed. Cymbals and hi hats are satisfying in this IEM. Detail retrieval is excellent for its price, as it should. Microdetails are easily picked up by the AS24. With this in return, this IEM isn’t forgiving on poorly recorded and mastered tracks.
- This is the part where I am pumped up with the KZ AS24. It managed to hit my technical preferences so well. The perceived soundstage is expansive - I can even say that this IEM sounds “immersive” to my ears. Separation and layering are excellent for its price and will handle busy tracks with ease. Imaging is precise and everything is on point.
- (Upper)Main Tuner, Switch #1: adds sensitivity to the overall frequencies of the IEM. In a nutshell, it will be perceived as “sensitive” or “more easy to drive” when switched on.
- (Upper) Main Tuner, Switch #2,3,4: Adds a few decibel to the lower frequencies to your liking.
- (Lower) Auxiliary Tuner, Switch #1,2: Adds a few decibel to the mids frequency to your liking.
- (Lower) Auxiliary Tuner, Switch #3,4: Adds a few decibel to the treble frequencies to your liking.
Some notable switch configurations:
- 1000/0000 (makes this IEM easier to drive and is a tad bit bright brighter)
- 1000/1100 (makes the mids more forward)
- 1000/1000 (makes the lower mids more forward )
- 1110/0000 (adds bass quantity)
- 1100/0000 (adds a slight bass quantity)
- 1111/1111 (makes the whole sound more boosted, w-shaped, but reveals more metallic, BA Timbre in return)
=====================================================================================================
Pros:- - The most “neutral” KZ as of today.
- - Clean, neutral sound.
- - Quick, clean, detailed bass response.
- - Open, detailed, relatively neutral mids.
- - Airy, open highs.
- - Highly technical sounding IEM under 150 USD.
- - Very good isolation.
- - Very good build quality.
- - Very good stock eartips. It is softer compared to their early version of stock eartips.
- - Easy to be driven to its full potential, but scales well on a better source.
- - Highly customizable sound signature to your liking. 8 switches per side!
Cons:
- - BA Timbre is not for everyone.
- - Very unforgiving on poorly recorded and mastered tracks (not a con for me, but some may find it so).
- - Slight upper mids peaks can be heard on some tracks (subjective).
- - Lacks a manual on how to operate the switches.
- - Definitely not for smaller ears.
- - Might get heavy on ears for longer usage on some ears.
- - Might be too sensitive on some source (more on that later).
- - Critically lacking accessories. A case, more than one set of eartips, and a decent cable is a necessity for this price point.
=====================================================================================================
Verdict
The KZ AS24 is the newest pinnacle IEM of the brand. Sound wise, KZ did really well tuning on this IEM as their first IEM stepping in the 100+USD IEM market, in my opinion. I really love how their recent IEMs are technically capable and sometimes even outperforms other brands in terms of technical performance on their own respective price point. The AS24 is the top example of KZ doing their homework really well, especially on how they implemented their tuning switch feature. Despite the said compromises they made with this IEM, I still recommend the KZ AS24 if you have a large set of ears and you really prefer a neutral-sounding, technically capable IEM with a lot of tuning switches to be customized to your liking. Well done, KZ!Verdict
Pairing recommendation/s:
- Source: This sounds just fine when plugged straight to a phone, but is vastly better when used with a proper source. I suggest using a warmer source for this one, preferably a not-powerful source such as an apple dongle, or a Musehifi M1. You may always use a neutral-sounding source, but pairing it with the AS24 will exhibit BA Timbre more. You do you.
- Eartips: Eartips included are soft and good in quality, but you may still use your preferred eartips.
- Cable is alright, but the heatshrink guide is kinda tight on my ears, causing a bit of fatigue during longer listening sessions. I removed the heatshrink guides on my cable, but you may always use your preferred 2 pin cable.
Additional Photos Here:
suicideup
@LikeHolborn The Simgot EW200 fits the description. If you want something more musical, you can never go wrong with the Kiwi Ears Cadenza. You'll trade some technical performance quality though 
TRN TA4 Review!
Good day! After 5 days of casual and critical listening, here’s my written review for the TRN TA4. Quite technical!
Disclaimer:
- - I don’t read and read FR graphs. I only use my ears, as how earphones should be used.
- - TRN sent this unit to me in an exchange for an honest, unbiased review. Rest assured that this review will do its best to devoid from any bias/es as much as possible.
- - The following remarks and observations shall be made and owned only by me.
- - No monetary compensation is/was involved before, during, and after the period of creation of this review.
- - Your mileage may (and always, will) vary.
Burn-in time: 4-8 hours per day, 5 days.
Source/s used:
- - Hiby R3 Pro Saber
- - Fosi Audio DS1
- - Non-HiFi smartphone (Infinix Note 12 G96), PC.
- - Local Files via Foobar, YouTube Music, Deezer, and Qobuz with UAPP.
IEM/Earbud/Setup configuration: stock large narrowbore eartips, any form of EQ or MSEB off, 3.5 SE plug, 40-60% volume, low gain and high gain.
================================================================================================================
Sound signature:- - The TRN TA4 nearly sounded “neutral-bright” to my ears, but specifically, this IEM sounds mild-u/v-shaped to bright most of the time. Its resolution and technicalities excel well when paired with a proper source.
Lows:
- - The lows are mildly elevated and clean. It is punchy and slightly midbass dominant. Bass attacks and decays are fairly fast without being “too lacking”. This is definitely not the highlight of this IEM, but those people who prefer that clean, “neutral” bass response without any presence of midbass bleed may find the bass profile of this IEM interesting.
- - The mids do not sound too recessed most of the time during my tests. It is well-placed, and open. Lower mids are adequately thick, with an average texture. This is very evident on Hozier and Ed Sheeran’s tracks. Upper mids are definitely elevated, clear, bright, sparkly and airy. It shows a bit of mild upper mids peak, probably because of the drivers used, and it may be too apparent for those people who exhibit very sensitive ears. In a nutshell, the TA4 is for people who seek brightness to their music-listening experience, in my opinion.
- - It is definitely, definitely bright. Airy and elevated is the game of the TRN TA4. With that being said, this isn’t for those people who have treble-sensitive ears as this exhibits that “BA timbre” on the treble, which also somehow shows that this IEM is quite unforgiving to the poorly-mastered or recorded tracks. In return, the TA4 exhibits very good detail retrieval, presenting microdetails with ease.
Soundstage, Imaging, and separation:
- - To me, this is where the TA4 excels. Despite having an average soundstage in terms of width, depth, and height, It makes up for it in the layering and separation department. It is really clean and renders heavy passages with ease. The vocals and instruments never go haywired to each other despite how busy the track is (but of course, this is my 100 USD standard so I am giving the credit where it is due). Imaging is precise as it renders all of the vocals and instrument position of the track accurately.
TRN TA4 on balanced output findings:
- Everything becomes cleaner, tighter, and may be perceived as “brighter” by some people. With this termination, it can be perceived as a neutral-bright sounding IEM.
Pros:
- - Clean, “almost” neutral sound signature.
- - Quick, clean bass response.
- - Open, well-placed mids.
- - Bright, airy, clean treble (subjective).
- - Very good detail retrieval.
- - Very good technical performance under 100 USD particularly on the separation and imaging.
- - Very good fit, comfort and isolation.
- - Very good build quality.
- - Very good inclusion of accessories. Modular cable is always a good treat!
- - Scales well depending on the setup paired.
- - Fairly easy to be driven to its full potential.
Cons:
- - BA timbre will not please most people’s ears (subjective).
- - Very unforgiving on poorly recorded and mastered tracks (not a con for me, but some may find it so).
- - Bright sound signature isn’t for everybody (subjective).
- - Slight treble peaks may not be for sensitive ears.
- - The preinstalled eartips did not do justice to the IEM’s sound.
- - A shirt clip/cable winder and a case would’ve been a good treat for everybody for this price.
Verdict
The TRN TA4 is a bright sounding, technically competent IEM. It managed to pass my preferences in terms of technical performance under 100 USD. While not for everyone, due to its somewhat BA timbre present and evident in its treble presentation, I do believe that those people who prefer a clean, bright sound with very good separation and layering performance will like how this IEM sounds. I am included in that group!
Pairing recommendation/s:
- - Source: This sounds just fine when plugged straight to a phone, but is vastly better when used with a proper source. I suggest using a warmer source for this one.
- - Eartips: Eartips included are soft and good in quality, but I don’t like how it sounds with the stock clear eartips preinstalled. You may use your preferred eartips.
- - Cable is a modular one, soft, and as good as it gets, but you may always use your preferred cable.
Non-affiliated link here: https://shopee.ph/Trn-TA4-2BA-2DD-F...2gpM33JR785vlFyYNykClY3X442DEyFYo5KLGbPDApxik
Additional Photos Here:
CVJ KE-S Review!
Good day! After 5 days of casual and critical listening, here’s my written review for the CVJ KE-S. The newest, fun kid in the budget block!
Disclaimer:
- I don’t read and read FR graphs. I only use my ears, as how earphones should be used.
- CVJ sent this unit to me in an exchange for an honest, unbiased review. Rest assured that this review will do its best to devoid from any bias/es as much as possible.
- The following remarks and observations shall be made and owned only by me.
- No monetary compensation is/was involved before, during, and after the period of creation of this review.
- Your mileage may (and always, will) vary.
Source/s used:
- Hiby R3 Pro Saber
- Fosi Audio DS1
- Non-HiFi smartphone (Infinix Note 12 G96), PC.
- Local Files via Foobar, YouTube Music, Deezer, and Qobuz with UAPP.
================================================================================================================
Sound signature:- The CVJ KE-S is a warm, v-shaped sounding set. Subbass-dominant bass, mildly recessed mids, slightly elevated, non-fatiguing treble.
- The lows are definitely elevated and subbass-dominant. This means that the bass will be rumbly and will rumble deep depending on the track. Its speed is average and is able to handle bass heavy tracks without any audible distortion. Bassheads on a budget will most likely love this IEM.
- The mids are mildly recessed and experiences some slight midbass bleed to keep things warm. Despite being recessed, the lower mids never sounded distant throughout my tests. It is lush, smooth, but with good texture and thickness as it is evident on male vocals and instruments associated in this region. Upper mids are elevated, with great amount of clarity, air, and sparkle. Despite all of these upper mid characteristics, the KE-S never sounded sibilant, harsh, or strident in this region.
- As for the highs, it is elevated but not as elevated compared to the upper mids. It is smooth, elevated and airy. Instances of peaks, pierce, and harshness are also absent in this IEM. Detail retrieval is also average and is able to pick up most details easily.
- In a nutshell, the KE-S’ technical performance isn’t out of ordinary, but managed to hit the good qualities of a good sounding budget IEM. The soundstage is wider than deep with a very good amount of height. Separation and layering are average and will go haywire if things get heavy, like rock or metal. Imaging is also accurate on both instrument and vocal rendition.
================================================================================================================
Pros:
- All-rounder, fun sound signature.
- Subbass-dominant bass response (subjective).
- Warm, smooth lower mids.
- Forward, clear upper mids.
- Non-fatiguing upper frequencies.
- Very good fit, comfort, and isolation.
- Very good timbre for a budget IEM!
- Easy to drive.
- Very cheap!
- There’s no serious flaws of this IEM in this price point tbh, but here are my nitpicks:
- There is a midbass bleed the smears to the lower mids.
- Technical performance is nothing to write home about
- A pouch or a cable winder would’ve been a great treat for everybody.
Verdict
The CVJ KE-S is now my current favorite IEM under 10USD! Its warm, fun sound will cater most usage and most people exist in this specific price range. I don’t see any major flaws or drawbacks on this IEM, and will now be my top recommendation under 10 USD as of writing of this review. It has been quite refreshing because this sound exists only within 20-50 USD a couple of years ago. Highly recommended!
Pairing recommendation/s:
- Source: This sounds just fine when plugged straight to a phone, but is vastly better when used with a proper source.
- Eartips: Eartips included are soft and good in quality, but you may always use your preferred eartips.
- Cable is soft and as good as it gets, but you may always use your preferred cable.
Thank you for reading!
Additional Photos Here:
Tangzu Princess Chang Le Review!
Good day! After 5 days of casual and critical listening, here’s my written review for the Tangzu Princes Chang Le. Sounds familiar, but better!
(Fun fact: Princess Changle, born Li Lizhi; (621 – September 28, 643) was a princess of the Tang dynasty. According to her epitaph, Li Lizhi was a smart lady, with a bright personality and beautiful appearance. She was favored by her parents, Taizong and Empress Zhangsun. Li Lizhi was also a painter. Li Lizhi died on September 28, 643, probably of genetic respiratory disease, the same cause as her mother.) (Source: Wikipedia)
Disclaimer:
- I don’t read and read FR graphs. I only use my ears, as how earphones should be used.
- Tangzu sent this unit to me in an exchange for an honest, unbiased review. Rest assured that this review will do its best to devoid from any bias/es as much as possible.
- The following remarks and observations shall be made and owned only by me.
- No monetary compensation is/was involved before, during, and after the period of creation of this review.
- Your mileage may (and always, will) vary.
Burn-in time: 4-8 hours per day, 5 days.
Source/s used:
- Hiby R3 Pro Saber
- Fosi Audio DS1
- Non-HiFi smartphone (Infinix Note 12 G96), PC.
- Local Files via Foobar, YouTube Music, Deezer, and Qobuz with UAPP.
================================================================================================================
Sound signature:- The Tangzu Princess Chang Le exhibits a warm, fun, u-shaped sound signature. According to some graphs posted by other reviewers, it somewhat follows the Harman Target Curve. It is also somewhat similar to the Sony MH755 in terms of sound signature, but with better technicalities.
- The lows are elevated and somewhat thick. It is a bit soft to my liking and is midbass focused. Its speed and decay are average and rarely get sloppy during my tests. In a nutshell, the lows of the Chang Le is fun and is able to deliver a satisfying bass experience, particularly for those bassheads on a budget.
- Despite not being too forward, the mids of the Chang Le is probably the highlight of this IEM in my humble opinion. It sounds so open, natural, and engaging despite exhibiting a slight midbass bleed enough to keep things warm. Lower mids show a good amount of weight and texture without getting drowned. Upper mids are elevated and shows a very good amount of clarity, air, and sparkle. Instances of unrefined, grainy peaks are preset on sibilant prone tracks, making the upper mids a bit thin to my liking despite exhibiting really good definition. This isn’t really a big deal for a budget IEM, but should be noted by those people who are sensitive to upper frequencies.
- As for the highs, it isn’t too bright nor dark - it is just right in terms of presence. It also exhibits a good amount of air and clarity and is evident on cymbal crashes and splashes. Detail retrieval is average and is able to render the major details just fine.
- The technical performance in a nutshell of the Princess Chang Le is average at best and nothing to write home about. It isn’t too bad nor too good - it is just alright and acceptable for its asking price. Soundstage is average with a good amount of height, width, and depth. Separation is average with some instances of congestion on very busy tracks. Imaging is accurate and is able to render vocal and instrument positioning just right.
================================================================================================================
Comparisons! VS Tanchjim Zero:
- The Tanchjim Zero is definitely less colored and more neutral than the Chang Le. It also slightly edges out the Chang Le in the technicalities, probably because of the lighter bass response.
- The Tanchjim Tanya is harder to drive when compared and is also more warm than the Chang Le. The mids are more open on the Chang Le. Upper mids and treble is also more clear and airy on the Chang Le.
- The Quarks is harder to drive and is more mellow-sounding when compared. Mids are also less engaging when compared to the Chang Le. Clarity is also better on the Chang Le.
- This is the Tangzu Chang Le, but with better technicalities, and with a more balanced, engaging sound. I prefer this more than the Chang Le.
- The KZ Ling Long is a more fun, warmer sounding IEM. Mids are more engaging on the Tangzu Chang Le and is less recessed when compared. Technicalities are a bit better on the Ling Long. There is a driver flex present on the KZ Ling Long due to the lack of vents, whereas the latter does not have. Both are hard to drive.
- I haven’t tried any of those.
================================================================================================================
Pros:- One of the best mids I’ve heard under 20 USD.
- Follows the Harman Target Curve. (subjective)
- Warm, fun sound signature.
- Thick, elevated bass.
- Open, nearly natural mids.
- Non-fatiguing upper frequencies.
- Very good mic quality.
- No venting pressure/ driver problem present.
- Tangle-free cable.
- Very good fit, build quality, and isolation.
- Very good eartips quality. Comes in two sets!
- Minimal cable microphonics!
- Beautiful box art!
- Upper mids are unrefined, have slight peaks, and may be perceived as “grainy”.
- There is a slight midbass bleed and is evident only on very busy passages.
- It is a bit hard to drive for its price.
- Cable is somewhat “springy” or stubborn to be kept easily.
- A pouch or a cable winder would’ve been a good treat to anybody.
================================================================================================================
Verdict
Verdict
The Tangzu Princess Chang Le is again, a very good set released by Tangzu. Its sound reminded me of the Sony MH755, probably because they follow the same Harman Target curve. There are slight differences, but overall it is somewhat similar, but with better technicalities and build quality. I recommend the Tangzu Princess Chang Le as your daily beater IEM for commutes and calls, a budget set for you or for someone, or specifically if you have a powerful source due to its hard to drive nature.
Pairing recommendation/s:
Thank you for reading!
Additional Photos Here:
Pairing recommendation/s:
- Source: This sounds just fine when plugged straight to a phone, but is vastly better when used with a powerful proper source. Dongles or sources with 2VRMs should be fine for the most part.
- Eartips: Eartips included are soft and good in quality, but you may always use your preferred eartips.
Thank you for reading!
Additional Photos Here:
Hidizs MD4 Review!
Good day! After 5 days of casual and critical listening, here’s my written review for the Hidizs MD4. The mermaid sings, sort of!
video review here! :
Additional Note/s here:
- I will be using the MD4 with the stock “balanced” configuration and compare the other modes from there.
Disclaimer/s:
- I don’t read and read FR graphs. I only use my ears, as how earphones should be used.
- Hidizs sent this unit to me in an exchange for an honest, unbiased review. Rest assured that this review will do its best to devoid from any bias/es as much as possible.
- The following remarks and observations shall be made and owned only by me.
- No monetary compensation is/was involved before, during, and after the period of creation of this review.
- Your mileage may (and always, will) vary.
Burn-in time: 4-8 hours per day, 5 days.
Source/s used:
- -Hiby R3 Pro Saber
- -Fosi Audio DS1
- -Non-HiFi smartphone (Infinix Note 12 G96), PC.
- -Local Files via Foobar, YouTube Music, Deezer, and Qobuz with UAPP.
=====================================================================================================
Sound signature:- With the “balanced” configuration set, the Hidizs MD4 exhibits a balanced, mild-v shaped sound signature. From there, the sound varies depending on the switch you configure it with.
- The lows are slightly elevated and are a bit midbass focused. Despite being an all-BA set, the bass exhibits a slightly softer than usual character to it, but still shows a good amount of articulation and speed. No matter what genre you listen to with this IEM, the Hidizs MD4 is able to cater most tracks easily, particularly in the bass department. There is a midbass bleed present in this configuration, which leads us to the mids.
- … is quite caved in , recessed, and sounds “off” which makes the mids not as extended and forward the way I prefer in this configuration. This is because of the midbass bleed/bloat smearing onto the mids. In return, lower mids are thick, muffled, and somewhat “boxy”. Male vocals seem to be sounding thicker than usual in this configuration. Upper vocals are slightly elevated in this configuration, exhibiting a good amount of clarity and sparkle. There are some instances of occasional peaks here and there, but nothing too off-putting for me to call it sibilant, strident, or hot.
- The highs are fairly extended, elevated, with a good amount of air. It isn’t as extended compared to the other configurations. Instances of sibilance in this region are non-existent in this area, but I am aware that there are other inputs experiencing some sibilance in this area, so do take note of those inputs as well if your ears are sensitive to upper frequencies. Detail retrieval in this configuration is average and is improved on other configurations.
- The MD4’s technical performance is average in this configuration and gets better on the other configurations. Its soundstage aimed for a more “pseudo-immersive” one rather than your usual wide soundstage due to its height and width nearly having the same depth. Separation and layering are mostly good for the most part, with some instances of overlapping on some heavy passages in this configuration. Imaging is precise and is able to render instrument and vocal positions clearly.
================================================================================================================
Other Driver Configurations! (U = UP, D = Down)- “Warm” Configuration (DU)
- This by far is the best configuration among the 4 in my opinion. Everything is much more extended, open, clean, and airy. The boxiness of the lower mids are also non-existent in this configuration. Resolution is also noticeably better and microdetails are much more heard in this configuration.
- “Treble Configuration” (DD)
- Flattens the bass and extends the treble even further by making things more airier than usual. Bass is more tight, faster, and controlled in quantity. The bloat is also non-existent in this configuration, but some upper mid peaks are more apparent in this configuration. Technical performance here is identical to the warm configuration. Personally this is my favorite configuration, but most people will prefer the “warm” configuration.
- “Bass Configuration” (UU)
- Extends and elevates the bass even further, making things more rumbly. The bloat is slightly present in this config, but is definitely shaved or trimmed down compared to the balanced configuration. The rest are more or less the same.
================================================================================================================
Pros:
- Clean, versatile sound signature.
- Never sounded thin despite exhibiting an all-BA driver configuration.
- Excellent tuning switch implementation.
- Deep, thick bass (bass and warm config)
- Fast transient decay.
- Excellent resolution and technical performance (warm and treble config)
- Airy, expansive upper frequencies (treble, warm config)
- Excellent fit, comfort, and isolation.
- Excellent build quality and visual details.
- Excellent packaging and included accessories. Lovely!
- Midbass bloat and muffled lower mids are present on “balanced configuration”.
- Peaks and slight sibilance are present on “treble” config.
- Instances of overlapping in separation and layering are experienced on “balanced” configuration.
================================================================================================================
Verdict
The Hidizs MD4 is a very good option if you are looking for a very good sounding IEM with tuning switches under 200 USD. Its versatile, all rounder sound makes it really good for most genres you pair with it. By far, the “warm” setting will suit most listening experiences as it balances both tonality and technical performance evenly, while removing the bloat on the lower mids. Not to mention its very good technical performance for its price on most of its configurations. Hidizs did really well on this set, and I am open to hear more improvements of their works in the future. I’m impressed!
================================================================================================================The Hidizs MD4 is a very good option if you are looking for a very good sounding IEM with tuning switches under 200 USD. Its versatile, all rounder sound makes it really good for most genres you pair with it. By far, the “warm” setting will suit most listening experiences as it balances both tonality and technical performance evenly, while removing the bloat on the lower mids. Not to mention its very good technical performance for its price on most of its configurations. Hidizs did really well on this set, and I am open to hear more improvements of their works in the future. I’m impressed!
Pairing recommendation/s:
- Source: This IEM is very easy to be driven, and prefers neutral source.
- Eartips: Eartips included are soft and good in quality, but you may always use your preferred eartips.
- Cable: Cable is as good and basic as it gets. You may use your preferred cable as always.
Additional Photos here:
KBEAR Pecker Review!
Good day! After 5 days of casual and critical listening, here’s my written review for the KB Ear Pecker. Tame Impala’s “Currents” 13th track!
Disclaimer:
- I don’t read and read FR graphs. I only use my ears, as how earphones should be used.
- KB Ear sent this unit to me in an exchange for an honest, unbiased review. Rest assured that this review will do its best to devoid from any bias/es as much as possible.
- The following remarks and observations shall be made and owned only by me.
- No monetary compensation is/was involved before, during, and after the period of creation of this review.
- Your mileage may (and always, will) vary.
Source/s used:
- Hiby R3 Pro Saber
- Fosi Audio DS1
- Non-HiFi smartphone (Infinix Note 12 G96), PC.
- Local Files via Foobar, YouTube Music, Deezer, and Qobuz with UAPP.
================================================================================================================
Sound signature:- Just like most KB Ear IEMs, the Pecker exhibits a warm, v-shaped sound signature. Being a tried and tested sound signature, the KBear Pecker is able to cater most genres you pair with it.
- As for the lows, it is elevated and is subbass dominant rather than midbass. It rumbles deep and may sound monotonous most of the time. Speed is slightly on the slower side and may sound a bit boomy on some tracks. In general, the KB Ear Pecker is capable of catering bassheads and their bassy tracks within this price range.
- Moving to the mids, it is recessed and suffers a bit of midbass bleed. This makes the lower mids a bit warmer than usual. In return, male vocals are also thick, lush, and smooth. Upper mids are elevated and exhibit a good amount of crispiness, clarity, and sparkle. There are peaks encountered here and there, but nowhere near too sibilant or fatiguing.
- The highs are elevated but not as elevated compared to the upper mids. This is evident in the presence of cymbals. It presents a good amount of extension and air without any harshness present. Detail retrieval is average at best and is able to present most microp and macrodetails on a track.
- There is nothing to write home about on the technical performance of the Pecker. Don’t get me wrong, it isn’t bad by any means but in my humble opinion, it is underwhelming for its asking price. The soundstage is wider than taller with a good amount of depth. Separation and layering is average with hints of congestion on very heavy passages. Imaging is accurate enough and is able to render vocal and instrument positions clearly.
================================================================================================================
Comparisons! VS KBEar KS2:
- The KS2 is definitely bassier and cleaner in bass when compared to the Pecker. The Pecker is thicker and more smoother sounding when compared. The rest are more or less the same.
- The Robin has a more safe upper frequencies and lacks a little bit of air when compared. The mids are also more forward on the Robin. The rest are more or less the same.
- The Rosefinch is a more bassy version of the Pecker. Its bass definitely packs the punch and the Rumble that most bassheads on a budget look for. Upper frequencies are clearer and airier on the Pecker. The rest are more or less the same.
================================================================================================================
Pros:- Follows the familiar all-rounder KBear house sound.
- Warm, non-fatiguing sound.
- Elevated, subbass dominant bass.
- Fairly thick mids.
- Non-fatiguing treble.
- Excellent fit and comfort .
- Very good isolation.
- Decent build quality.
- Nearly has the same sound quality compared to their previous IEMs before.
- Bass is monotonous most of the time.
- Bass can be slightly boomy depending on the pairing used.
- There is a bit of midbass bleed.
- Midrange is a bit recessed to my liking (subjective).
- Instances of peaks can be perceived on sibilant prone tracks.
- Technical performance is below average for its asking price (subjective).
- A pouch or a shirt clip in this price would’ve been a good treat for anybody.
================================================================================================================
Verdict
The KBEar Pecker is an IEM that you can recommend to most people who are looking for and IEM that sounds good no matter what genre you throw at it. Its warm, bass-elevated sound will cater most people who just want to have a daily beater IEM for most use case scenarios. As for competition wise, I don’t see this competing with other IEMs that exist within the same price range. Hopefully KBEar will bring something new to the table next time.Verdict
Pairing recommendation/s:
- Source: This IEM is very easy to be driven to its full potential. However, a better source does better things. Neutral or warm sources are welcome.
- Eartips: Eartips included are soft and good in quality, but you may always use your preferred eartips. KBEar’s own 07 eartips slightly improves the sound of the Pecker.
- Cable: Cable is as good and basic as it gets. You may use your preferred cable as always.
Thank you for reading!
Non-affiliate link here: https://keephifi.com/products/kbear-pecker?_pos=1&_sid=b654028cb&_ss=r
Additional photos here!
KZ X HBB PR2 Review!
Good day! After 5 days of casual and critical listening, here’s my written review for the KZ X HBB PR2. Speed devil, revamped!
Disclaimer:
- I don’t read and read FR graphs. I only use my ears, as how earphones should be used.
- KZ sent this unit to me in an exchange for an honest, unbiased review. Rest assured that this review will do its best to devoid from any bias/es as much as possible.
- The following remarks and observations shall be made and owned only by me.
- No monetary compensation is/was involved before, during, and after the period of creation of this review.
- Your mileage may (and always, will) vary.
Burn-in time: 4-8 hours per day, 5 days.
Source/s used:
- Hiby R3 Pro Saber
- Fosi Audio DS1
- Non-HiFi smartphone (Infinix Note 12 G96), PC.
- Local Files via Foobar, YouTube Music, Deezer, and Qobuz with UAPP.
=====================================================================================================
- The KZ PR2 is a warm-neutral sounding IEM. It can be perceived as a mild-v/u-shaped sounding IEM by most, depending on the setup used. Just like any other planar-magnetic IEMs existing in today’s market, it exhibits excellent technical performance. What sets it apart is it is cheaper and has less planar timbre when compared.
- The lows are definitely elevated but never sounded overwhelming. The bass focuses more on the subbass than the midbass, making things rumble rather than punchy. Subbass really goes deep and thick whenever the track needs it. Despite being tuned that way, it is clean, and quick in attack and decay. Being tuned by HBB, bassheads on a budget may expect its bass to suffice on most bass heavy or EDM tracks.
- “Clean and natural” is what I would describe the PR2’s mids. It never sounded recessed, or even drowned even on busiest tracks due to its midbass bleed-free mids, while keeping a tinge of warmth to the mids for a smooth listening experience. Lower mids are textured and exhibit a good amount of thickness and texture. Upper mids are slightly elevated, particularly on the female vocals. It is sparkly, airy, and clear. Sibilance, peaks, and harshness are absent on this IEM, which means this IEM can be recommended for those people who are sensitive to upper frequencies.
- Moving on to the highs, it is well extended and detailed, with a good amount of air. I did not find it to be “lacking” or “rolled off”, but it may depend on the pairing used with the PR2. There is a bit of “planar timbre” present but definitely minimal when compared to most planar-magnetic IEMs I have encountered under 100 USD. This has better handling on planar timbre when compared to the KZ PR1 Pro, Letshuoer S12, 7Hz Dioko, and Moondrop Stellaris when compared.
- Of course, KZ PR2 is a planar magnetic IEM doing “planar things” - it is excellent in technical performance under 100 USD. Soundstage leans to the “pseudo-holographic” side wherein “you” are “immersed” in the music rather than just watching things in front of you. It is a bit taller than being wide, with a good amount of depth. Separation and layering are excellent as instruments and other elements in music never sounded overlapping even on heavy passages.
=====================================================================================================
Comparisons!
VS Tangzu Zetian Wu:- The Zetian Wu is a bassier, thicker, lusher, warmer sounding IEM. The KZ PR2 is less warmer and thicker, but sounds more open when compared. Treble on the Zetian Wu is less extended when compared to the PR2. Technical performance is also better on the PR2, but not by a mile. When compared, the PR2 tried to balance both technicality and tonal quality, while the Zetian Wu aimed for a musical, listening experience. It is also slightly harder to drive and has more planar timbre when compared.
- Planar timbre are more obvious and apparent on the Dioko. It is also brighter and exhibits sibilance, pierce, and peaks most of the the times. Detail retrieval is slightly better on the Dioko, while the bass is better on the PR2. The rest is more or less the same.
- The S12 exhibits more recession of the mids when compared to the PR2. The bass is not as controlled when compared to the PR2 but hits harder. Treble is brighter and introduces more planar timbre and harshness compared to the PR2. The soundstage lacks a little bit of depth on the S12 when compared. The rest is more or less the same.
- The Stellaris simply burned too hot and too soon. PR2 is better overall.
- The aforementioned 3 IEMs do share the same characteristics: all of them are more or less midbass-focused IEMs. The PR2 is subbass-focused. Mids on the three KZ Planar IEMs are a tad bit recessed when compared. The planar timbre are also more apparent on the three KZ Planar IEMs when compared to the PR2. The rest are nearly the same.
=====================================================================================================
Pros:- Better than previous KZ Planar IEMs while being relatively cheap.
- All-rounder, well-done bassy sound signature.
- Clean, elevated bass.
- “Natural”, detailed mids.
- Non-fatiguing upper frequencies.
- Greatly reduced planar timbre.
- Clean, quick, detailed transients.
- Excellent overall technical performance under 50USD (as it should, it’s a planar)
- Very good build quality.
- Very good fit, comfort, and isolation.
- Finally, a softer starline eartips!
- Aesthetically pleasing design language (subjective)
- While the soundstage is somewhat “pseudo-immersive”, it isn’t the widest-sounding planar under 100USD in my book.
- Critically minimal accessories. A braided cable or even a case would’ve been a very good treat to anybody.
- 2pin QDC port (subjective)
- Needs a fair amount of power to sound the best (This isn’t really a con tbh because of course, this is a Planar magnetic IEM. I just like to put it here).
=====================================================================================================
Verdict
The KZ X HBB PR2 is definitely one my recommended IEM for those people who seek a good-sounding planar-magnetic IEM under 100USD. As long as you pair this with a fairly powerful source (since it is a planar, of course) it sings well and is easily an all-rounder sounding unit. I will put this on my top recommendations under 100USD along with the Simgot EA500, Etymotic ER2SE, Celest Pandamon, and NF Audio NM2 if you are looking for a technically-capable IEM in this Chi-Fi market full of tonality-focused IEMs. KZ sure is an advocate of IEM cannibalism!
Pairing recommendation/s:
- Source: As all planars do, the KZ PR2 needs a fairly powerful source to shine. Fosi Audio DS1, IBasso DC05, Xduoo Link2bal, and FiiO KA3 are some of the examples. Or maybe, your Hiby R3 Pro Saber in high gain mode will do.
- Eartips: Eartips included are soft and good in quality, but you may always use your preferred eartips
- Cable: Cable is as good and basic as it gets. You may use your preferred cable as always.
Thank you for reading!
Additional photos here:
CVJ TXS Review!
Good day! After 5 days of casual and critical listening, here’s my written review for the CVJ TXS. Another contender!
======================================================================================
- I don’t read and read FR graphs. I only use my ears, as how earphones should be used.
- CVJ sent this unit to me in an exchange for an honest, unbiased review. Rest assured that this review will do its best to devoid from any bias/es as much as possible.
- The following remarks and observations shall be made and owned only by me.
- No monetary compensation is/was involved before, during, and after the period of creation of this review.
- Your mileage may (and always, will) vary.
Special Note/s here:
- Throughout this review, I will be using the TXS on its default config (00)(0 means down, 1 means up), then compare the other configuration from there.
=====================================================================================================
Burn-in time: 4-8 hours per day, 5 days.Source/s used:
- -Hiby R3 Pro Saber
- -Fosi Audio DS1
- -Non-HiFi smartphone (Infinix Note 12 G96), Laptop.
- -Local Files via Foobar, YouTube Music, Deezer, and Qobuz with UAPP.
=====================================================================================================
Sound signature:- The CVJ TXS is a pleasant sounding set in its basic setup (00). Most people would experience it as a warm neutral sounding IEM, with subtle variations depending on the mode selected.
- The lows are elevated and are midbass focused. The midbass is definitely punchy and has more quantity in the subbass, but it is quite thick and may come across as “soft” by some ears. Decay and attack is average and sounds pleasing on bassy or bass heavy tracks, particularly for those who seek a bassy IEM on a budget.
- Moving on to the mids, it is well-placed. It never sounded too forward nor recessed. There is a bit of midbass bleed that gives a bit of warmth, making things sound a bit “thicker” than usual. Upper mids are ever-so-slightly elevated, exhibiting a good amount of clarity and sparkle. Unnatural peaks, pierce, and sibilance are absent in this IEM , offering a non-fatigue free sound.
- As for the highs, it is well-extended and extends more on the other modes, more into that later. It is also airy and free from fatigue. Detail retrieval is average and will still present most details fairly easily.
- The technical performance of the CVJ TXS is average - nothing too bad but nothing to write home about either. The soundstage is average in width, height and depth. Separation and layering is average and may suffer slight congestion on very heavy passages. Imaging is accurate and renders vocal and instrument positioning decently.
LEGEND: 1 = UP, 0 = DOWN
- - 10 and 11 - Also known as the “Phone mode” and are two versions of the aforementioned mode: It turns everything into a fun, v-shaped sound by extending the highs and bass.
- - 01 - Known as the “Game Mode” wherein the perceived bass is reduced, making it a bit brighter in sound. Its soundstage is also slightly wider.
- - 00 - Is the default TXS tuning as it exhibits a warm, “neutral” sound.
=====================================================================================================
Comparisons! (TXS on default config (00))VS TRN MT1 Max on “balanced” config:
- The TXS is definitely bassier and is more smoother when compared. The MT1 Max edges the TXS slightly on the technical department but is very negligible in my opinion.
- The D-Fi is obviously better than the TXS even in sound alone. Everything is cleaner and controlled on the D-Fi. Technical performance is also better on the D-Fi, due to its clean tuning.
=====================================================================================================
Pros:- The cheapest IEM with tuning switches as of now! (that was fast).
- All-rounder sound signature across all switch configurations.
- Punchy, elevated bass (subjective).
- Almost clean bass presentation (gaming mode)
- Warm, smooth mids.
- Decent treble response.
- Decent technical performance.
- Very good fit and comfort.
- Easy to be driven to its full potential.
- Very good quality of accessories for its price. Finally, a cable winder!
- Midbass may be perceived as “overwhelming and soft” (hifi mode)
- Despite all of these configurations possible, the differences between each configuration are minimal.
- A pouch would’ve been a good treat for everybody. (subjective).
================================================================================================================
Verdict
Verdict
The CVJ TXS is now the cheapest IEM with tuning controls on the market! I must acknowledge that the ChiFi market has been aggressive with the present trend and continues to advance. In a word, the CVJ TXS has an all-arounder, pleasant tone that will appeal to people looking for a low-cost IEM with adjustable tuning controls. It does not have any significant flaws for the price that would cause me to recommend it. Do give it a try!
Pairing recommendation/s:
- Source: This IEM is easy to be driven to its full potential. However, it seems to scale in sound quality depending on the source paired with it. Any 2VRMs dongle will show its full potential.
- Eartips: Eartips included are good enough, but you may use any third party eartips you prefer. I recommend KBEAR 07 or Final E eartips for this one.
- Cable: Cable is as good and basic as it gets. You may use your preferred cable as always.
Thank you for reading!
Additional photos here:
Attachments
KZ D-Fi (Tunable Version) Review!
Good day! After 7 days of casual and critical listening, here’s my written review for the KZ D-Fi (tunable version). KZ’s Magnum Opus!
Disclaimer:
- I don’t read and read FR graphs. I only use my ears, as how earphones should be used.
- KZ sent this unit to me in an exchange for an honest, unbiased review. Rest assured that this review will do its best to devoid from any bias/es as much as possible.
- The following remarks and observations shall be made and owned only by me.
- No monetary compensation is/was involved before, during, and after the period of creation of this review.
- Your mileage may (and always, will) vary.
- Throughout this review, I will be using the KZ on its default config (0000)(0 means down, 1 means up), then compare the other configuration from there.
Source/s used:
- -Hiby R3 Pro Saber
- -Fosi Audio DS1
- -Non-HiFi smartphone (Infinix Note 12 G96), Laptop.
- -Local Files via Foobar, YouTube Music, Deezer, and Qobuz with UAPP.
=====================================================================================================
Sound signature:- On default configuration (0000), the KZ D-Fi has a "fairly neutral" sound signature, which can be interpreted as u-shaped by some, but to me I prefer to call it "neutral-warm," as it is warm yet does not have any perceivable recession of the midrange region.
- The lows are present and are mildly elevated. It is more midbass dominant than subbass, but there are still a good amount of sub bass here to cater most EDM and bass heavy tracks you listen to your heart’s content. Attack and decay are quite quick most of the time but it never badly lacked on any genre that I threw at it. This makes the D-Fi able to deliver clean, punchy lows, without smearing too much in the mids.
- As for the mids, it is "naturally" placed; It is not too forward nor too recessed, but may sometimes sound "laid back" in certain configurations. Lower mids exhibit good thickness and depth, delivering good texture and detail on male vocals and instruments present in the region. Upper mids are slightly elevated in this configuration and may elevate or tone down depending on the configuration you prefer. There are also no peaks, harshness, or sibilance present in this configuration while delivering very good quality in clarity, air, and sparkle.
- Moving on to the highs, it is slightly elevated, well-extended, and free from any harshness and/or fatigue. It also elevates and recesses depending on the configuration you set it in. Detail retrieval is average and can pick up most details in a track.
- In a nutshell, the technical performance of the D-Fi falls in the average to above-average category under 100 USD. It is nothing to write home about, but it definitely did nothing bad at all. Soundstage width, depth, and height are average; separation is good enough and can cater to heavy passages fairly easily; imaging is fairly precise and will render instrument and vocal positioning easily.
LEGEND: 1 = UP, 0 = DOWN
- - 0000 - The default tuning of the D-Fi. Neutral warm, mild u-shaped warm.
- - 0001 - The U-shaped bright/Neutral bright sound configuration. Lessens the warmth and elevates the upper frequencies. My preferred tuning configuration.
- - 0010 - Increases the midbass quantity and makes the mids a bit warmer.
- - 0011 - Sounds like the usual Harman target curve, with more upper mids-treble elevation and sparkle.
- - 0100 - Adds more depth to its overall sound, adds more lows, and lessens upper frequency quantity. On some tracks, the mids may sound recessed. Loses a bit of air in return.
- - 0101 - Vocals become forward, making things sound a bit more intimate than usual. Lows are also elevated, particularly its midbass.
- - 0110 - Almost the same as what you would get with the 0101 config, but is less bright and less intimate.
- - 0111 - Sounds more v-shaped than u-shaped to my ears. Upper frequencies are definitely more elevated and bright.
- - 1000 - Nearly the same as what the 0000 config sound, but with more subbass presence. It is still not a sub bass monster though.
- - 1001 - Sounds U-shaped bright to my ears. It is noticeably airy, especially on the vocals, but may sound hollow at times.
- - 1010 - Almost the same as the 0000 tuning, but with more subbass quantity. Still, it does not dig that deep.
- - 1011 - This is the better 0101 configuration, due to its noticeable added sound thickness.
- - 1100 - This sounds L-shaped to my ears. Bass is elevated.
- - 1101 - Sounds like the 0111 config but less aggressive when compared.
- - 1110 - Probably the most "bassy" configuration next to the 0000 config.
- - 1111 - Nearly the same sound as the 1110, but with more upper frequency presence.
=====================================================================================================
Comparisons! (VS D-Fi on default config (0000))VS TRN MT1 Max on “balanced” config:
- The overall sound of the D-Fi is definitely on the lighter side when compared, and also leans on the “neutral” sound signature more than the MT1 Max. Peaks, harshness, and sibilance are also almost absent on the D-Fi when compared to the latter. Technical performance is more or less the same. Fit, build quality, and comfort is definitely better on the D-Fi, as it should be.
=====================================================================================================
Pros:
- Once again, the current best KZ yet (subjective).
- Versatile, all rounder sound signature.
- Scales well with different pairings and sources.
- Offers 16 different possible tuning configurations.
- Very good sound quality even on stock configuration (0000).
- Has the most “neutral” sound signature among all KZ IEMs (0001).
- Agile bass response.
- Natural, well-placed mids.
- Non-fatiguing upper frequencies.
- Very good technical performance on certain configurations for its price.
- Excellent build quality Polished metal!
- Very good fit and comfort.
- For the first time, a KZ with 2 sets of silicone eartips!
- Despite having 16 possible tuning configurations, most of them exhibit only slight differences in overall sound.
- The right driver’s tuning switch interface is upside down compared to its right driver, which may cause confusion to some.
- Just like the EDA Balanced, this IEM isn’t tuned to be a basshead’s dream (still subjective).
- There are no manuals included on how to operate the tuning switches, or a guide on which configuration sounds which.
- Despite being an excellent performer in the tonal department, its imaging is just average on certain configurations.
- There are some mild peaks on certain configurations with the stock eartips paired.
- Fit is a bit tight on the stock cable.
- QDC connection is cumbersome and visually ruins the overall visual aesthetic (subjective).
- IEM may be a bit bulky and/or heavy on some ears.
- A pouch or a case would’ve been a great treat for everybody due to its amount of included accessories.
Verdict
The KZ D-Fi (tunable version) is KZ’s Magnum Opus, in my opinion. In this Chi-Fi market era where tuning switches became relevant once again, the KZ D-Fi managed to be one of the well-known among all of those that exist, mainly because of its competitive price-to-performance ratio. Even in stock form, it managed to go toe-to-toe with some of the IEMs that existed under 100 USD in terms of its tonal performance. To me, the KZ D-Fi is an easy recommendation for anyone who wants an IEM that can be tuned according to their liking. With that being said, I wonder what the non-tunable version sounds like. I'll probably let the other hobbyists answer that question.Pairing recommendation/s:
- Source: This IEM is easy to be driven to its full potential. However, pairing it with a warmer source makes things a bit thicker.
- Eartips: Eartips included are alright, but could be better in terms of fit and isolation. I recommend KBEAR 07 or Final E eartips for this one.
- Cable: Cable is as good but the ear hooks are quite stiff and affects the fit of this IEM to my ears..
Thank you for reading!
Additional Photos Here:
Attachments
SIMGOT EA500 Review!
Good day! After 5 days of casual and critical listening, here’s my written review for the SIMGOT EA500. The current 100USD IEM’s peak form, probably!
Disclaimer:
- I don’t read and read FR graphs. I only use my ears, as how earphones should be used.
- Simgot sent this unit to me in an exchange for an honest, unbiased review. Rest assured that this review will do its best to devoid from any bias/es as much as possible.
- The following remarks and observations shall be made and owned only by me.
- No monetary compensation is/was involved before, during, and after the period of creation of this review.
- Your mileage may (and always, will) vary.
Special Note/s here:
- Throughout this review, I will be using the Simgot EA500 with the black tuning filter nozzle on, as it is the company’s signature house sound, then compare the red tuning filter nozzle from there.
Burn-in time: 4-8 hours per day, 5 days.
Source/s used:
- -Hiby R3 Pro Saber
- -Fosi Audio DS1
- -Non-HiFi smartphone (Infinix Note 12 G96), Laptop.
- -Local Files via Foobar, YouTube Music, Deezer, and Qobuz with UAPP.
IEM/Earbud/Setup configuration: stock medium eartips, stock cable, any form of EQ or MSEB off, 40-60% volume, low gain and high gain,with and without extra amplification.
=====================================================================================================
Sound signature:
- - With the black tuning filter nozzle used, the SIMGOT EA500 sports the SIMGOT’s house sound, which leans toward a slightly bright sound signature. The EA500 itself may sound within the range of a mild-v,mild-u,w-shaped, or neutral-bright sound signature, depending on the setup and ears used. Changing the filter to the red one will make the EA500 sound like your usual Harman Target curve (u-shaped), but it is a bit refined in the treble department compared to most Harman-sounding IEMs available on the market.
- -Clean, non-lacking, and detailed are the descriptors I can fit for the EA500. It never smeared any other frequencies, keeping things fun and non-sterile. Midbass and subbass levels are almost equal in quantity, with the midbass being slightly dominant. Bass decay here is rather quick but is able to produce sufficient subbass for bass-heavy genres such as EDM and metal. Bassheads will be happy with this IEM, but they will prefer it with the red filter paired; more on that later.
- - The midrange is the best and strongest suit of the EA500, as it sounds W-shaped to my ears. Simgot managed to balance the tonal and technical performance of this IEM without being too analytical or too blunt in presentation. Lower mids sound almost natural in both placement and depth. Sam Smith and Ed Sheeran’s voices here are well-textured and clean. Upper mids are slightly elevated with a very good amount of clarity, air, and sparkle. There is no sibilance or harshness present here, but since this is a slightly bright IEM, this tuning filter may not be in favor of those who are sensitive to upper frequencies. Overall, the mids of the EA500 is one of the best and my favorite mids I have encountered under 100 USD, as it never skimped in any detail or texture on all the test tracks I have with me.
- - The highs are also slightly elevated, airy, and sparkly with the black filter. Still, it doesn’t exhibit any form of harshness, peaks, or piercing in this region. Microdetails are definitely present with this filter and are shown easily by the EA500.
- - For its price, the technical performance of the EA500 is one of the best under 100 USD. The soundstage is wide and exhibits a very good amount of height and depth. Some people may call it "holographic" on most tracks. Separation and layering are above average, as it handles most busy tracks neatly and with ease. Imaging is on the precise side and is able to present vocal and instrument positions with excellent clarity.
Other tuning configurations:
- With the red tuning filter nozzle
- When used with this filter, the EA500 sounds like Harman, which is u-shaped in a nutshell and leans to the warmer side. The bass here gets chunkier, more elevated, and still midbass-focused, but is lacking in texture and articulation. The mids slightly warms and recesses but maintains its character, and the treble also loses a bit of detail retrieval. The soundstage also gets smaller by a little bit due to the bass elevation of this filter.
Comparisons! (VS SIMGOT EA500 with Black Filter)
VS NF Audio NM2
- Both are top and technical performers in my book, but the NF Audio NM2 is brighter. It also has lighter shells and is made of plastic.
- - Both IEMs have the ability to change sound signatures due to their detachable nozzles. The AM850 MK2 is also brighter when compared to the EA500. Instances of peaks and sibilance are much more present on the AM850 MK2 compared to the EA500. Soundstage is also a bit wider on the AM850 MK2, but lacks a bit of depth when compared. It is also pricier compared to the EA500.
- - The forward mids on the Autumn is the first thing that I have noticed when compared. The bass is also more refined and controlled in the Autumn. The treble is also less brighter. The EA500 excels in speed and cleanliness of its sound when compared. It is also slightly more detailed in general, but can be negligible. Autumn is also pricier, of course.
- - The Pandamon sounds more neutral and more controlled when compared side by side. It also sounds “softer” in presentation, has more forward mids, and slightly lacks air when compared. As for the technicalities, both IEMs are nearly the same in terms of quality.
- - The EA500 reminds me of the first version of the Yuan Li, which was already discontinued and was a bit pricier when it existed in terms of its overall sound and scalability. It has chunkier bass to boot, but has recessed mids when compared. It was also warmer and slightly less detailed by a hair thin. Treble performance is nearly the same, but the Yuan Li exhibited more instances of peaks when it existed. It also scales well just like the EA500 but was picky due to its hard-to-drive nature.
Pros:
- One of the best IEMs under 100 USD in my book (subjective).
- Excellent,clean,versatile, well-done sound signature and quality.
- Very good balance between tonal and technical performance.
- Versatile tuning capabilities due to its removable screw-on tuning nozzles.
- Non-lacking, detailed bass quantity and quality for most genres on both tuning filters.
- Textured, excellent mids quality and placement on both tuning filters.
- Airy, highly detailed upper frequency presentation on black tuning filters.
- Excellent technical performance under 100 USD.
- Easy to be driven to its full potential.
- Scales well depending on the setup paired.
- Excellent fit and comfort .
- Well-crafted, durable build quality.
- Visually-pleasing packaging. It screams craftsmanship and geometry!
- This IEM is not overly bright but may not be preferred by treble-sensitive ears or those people who prefer warmth.
- This IEM is fingerprint, smudge, and scratch magnet/prone. A cleaning cloth would’ve been nice to maintain its aesthetically pleasing metal shells.
- The supplied eartips are somewhat lacking for its price. It does not affect the sound quality in a negative tone, but I find it gripless to my ears which may affect the seal of the IEM especially during walks or commutes.
Verdict
It is very easy for me to recommend the Simgot EA500. It is truly one of the best IEMs under $100, as it can cater to all types of genres and tracks you throw at it without any compromises or sweat. Its ability to be driven easily enables it to cater to the masses, like those who prefer using a smartphone or a laptop for their simple listening setup. The Simgot EA500 definitely updates my preferred IEMs for everyone under $100 USD! It is clearly up there, along with the Celest Pandamon and NF Audio NM2—the IEMs that never skimped on the technical performance that everyone deserves. The EA500 never aimed to be perfect, but it definitely did things excellently in its class and probably will be a timeless recommendation for everyone within or without the loop in this hobby. You should give them a try!
It is very easy for me to recommend the Simgot EA500. It is truly one of the best IEMs under $100, as it can cater to all types of genres and tracks you throw at it without any compromises or sweat. Its ability to be driven easily enables it to cater to the masses, like those who prefer using a smartphone or a laptop for their simple listening setup. The Simgot EA500 definitely updates my preferred IEMs for everyone under $100 USD! It is clearly up there, along with the Celest Pandamon and NF Audio NM2—the IEMs that never skimped on the technical performance that everyone deserves. The EA500 never aimed to be perfect, but it definitely did things excellently in its class and probably will be a timeless recommendation for everyone within or without the loop in this hobby. You should give them a try!
Pairing recommendation/s:
- - Source: This IEM is easy to be driven to its full potential. However, pairing it with a warmer source makes things a bit smoother and more versatile.
- - Eartips: The stock eartips here do not affect the sound negatively, but are not grippy to my liking. Eartips such as JVC Spiral Dots, Final E eartips, or KBEAR 07 eartips are my recommendations.
- - Cable: Cable is as good as it gets, but you may always use your preferred cable.
Non-affiliated link here: http://www.simgot.com/en/products/detail/26.html#!/detail
Additional Photos Here:
Redcarmoose
“Pros: One of the best IEMs under 100 USD in my book (subjective).”
I have to agree with this statement.
I have to agree with this statement.
TRN MT1 MAX Review!
Good day! After 5 days of casual and critical listening, here’s my written review for the TRN MT1 Max. Jack of all trades, master of none, but oftentimes better than a master of one!
Disclaimer:
- I don’t read and read FR graphs. I only use my ears, as how earphones should be used.
- TRN sent this unit to me in an exchange for an honest, unbiased review. Rest assured that this review will do its best to devoid from any bias/es as much as possible.
- The following remarks and observations shall be made and owned only by me.
- No monetary compensation is/was involved before, during, and after the period of creation of this review.
- Your mileage may (and always, will) vary.
- Throughout this review, I will be using the TRN MT1 Max on “balanced” config, then compare the other configuration from there.
Source/s used:
-Hiby R3 Pro Saber
-Fosi Audio DS1
-Non-HiFi smartphone (Infinix Note 12 G96 Samsung), Laptop.
-Local Files via Foobar, YouTube Music, Deezer, and Qobuz with UAPP.
IEM/Earbud/Setup configuration: stock large eartips, stock cable, any form of EQ or MSEB off, 40-60% volume, low gain and high gain,with and without extra amplification.
========================================================================
Sound signature:
- On “balanced” configuration, the TRN MT1 Max exhibits a well-done, mild v/u-shaped sound signature. This exact sound reminded me of the time when I still had my TRN V20 which I enjoyed a lot due to its relatively balanced sound signature. When compared to there, this sounds more refined, cleaner, and technically capable, tenfold.
- The lows exhibited here in the MT1 Max are punchy, clean and very capable of presenting hard-hitting bass when needed. It is slightly elevated on this config, and has a good balance of attack and decay. There are times that some people may find that the subbass may slightly lack presence, but it is rare and is present on specific tracks only (ex. Harleys in Hawaii - Katy Perry). Budget bassheads and EDM junkies will find the MT1 Max enjoyable.
- Moving on to the mids, it is well-placed, with some hints of slight recession depending on the track and pairing used. However, it never went distant or drowned during my tests as it is still clear and present most of the time. Lower mids have a good amount of depth, texture and thickness. It isn’t as “natural” when compared to the KZ Ling Long but it is definitely cleaner. Upper mids are elevated, with a good amount of texture, clarity, and sparkle. The upper mids may be perceived as “too bright and/or peaky” by people with sensitive ears, but It never came across as too sibilant or piercing within the normal volumes.
- As for the highs, it is elevated, airy, and sparkly, especially if it is used with the treble configuration. It never sounded sibilant at all but may be too much for some people. Detail retrieval is actually good for its price and can pick up details easily.
- In general, the technical performance on the TRN MT1 Max is above average, if we are talking under 20USD. The soundstage is wide, with a good amount of height and depth if we are talking about IEMs and their nature. Separation and layering is also fairly good for most busy tracks I have tested with. It is able to present things clearly without too much congestion. Imaging is average and can render instrument and vocal positions clearly.
Bass-enhanced mode (UDD)
- L-shaped sound signature. Elevates the bass even more, and rolls off the upper frequencies. It may sound “muted” for most people.
- Neutral-bright sound signature. Elevated the treble, making things airy and wider than usual. Introduces slight peaks and additional brightness as well.
- “Balanced” sound signature. Technically my whole review.
- Makes things more v-shaped, but very negligible and is nearly the same when compared to the balanced mode.
Comparisons! (VS MT1 Max on Balanced config)
VS KZ Ling Long
- The MT1 Max is cleaner and more versatile in sound, while the Ling Long aims to a more “natural”, bassy approach.
- Both are clean sounding IEMs. The Zero aims for a more neutral, or some may even call it as flat-sounding, while the MT1 Max still aims for fun.
- The ZVX is a bit cleaner in sound but lacks more subbass when compared. It is also smaller in soundstage and is brighter in sound.
- The Wan’er is more “safe” in sound while keeping things really neutral and thick. It is a bit behind compared to the MT1 Max in terms of technicalities, particularly in layering and separation.
- The lows are more elevated and the mids are more recessed. The MT1 Max is definitely cleaner in sound.
Pros:
- The cheapest IEM yet with a tuning switch.
- All-rounder, mass-oriented sound signature.
- Punchy, fairly clean bass on all switch configurations.
- Well-placed mids on all switch configurations.
- Airy upper frequencies (treble config).
- Non-fatiguing treble (bass config).
- Above-average technical performance under 20USD.
- Excellent fit and comfort.
- Very good amount of accessories included for its price.
- The included eartips affect the overall sound in every configuration negatively. It is advised to change the stock eartips right away.
- No tuning switch manual is present with the product and may cause confusion to some people.
- The tuning on my unit out of the box is set at “treble” mode. It should be at balanced mode out of the box (subjective).
- The overall sound of the “treble” configuration may be perceived as “thin and peaky” when paired with the stock eartips (again, eartips is the culprit).
- Upper frequencies may be perceived as “too bright” by some people, but by no means too sibilant (subjective).
- The treble on the “bass” configuration is too rolled off to my liking (subjective).
- The “Xtra Bass” and “Balanced” modes only offer subtle differences and are negligible for the most part. (subjective)
- A hard case, cable winder, or a pouch would’ve been a good treat to everybody since this IEM has a tuning switch tool included (looks like a sim ejector tool).
- The cable is rubbery in terms of feel and gets tangled easily.
========================================================================
Verdict
As I write this review, I can definitely say that the TRN MT1 Max successfully achieved its goal: to be the cheapest IEM in the market with the capability to cater multiple sound signatures for everyone, in one IEM. This is definitely a recommendable IEM for everyone who wants an IEM with different sound signature for their different music preferences.
Pairing recommendation/s:
- Source: This IEM is easy to be driven to its full potential. However, pairing it with a warmer source makes things a bit smoother.
- Eartips: Eartip rolling definitely makes things better as the stock eartips degrade the sound of the IEM. I recommend KBEAR 07 or Final E eartips for this one.
- Cable: Cable is as good as it gets, but you may always use your preferred cable.
Thank you for reading!
Additional Photos here:
