Introduction
BGVP is a Chinese brand that produces in-ear monitors (iems). They are known for their Sidy iems and have produced other iems such as YSP04 and DGS100. Recently, they have released 2 new iems – SGZ DN1 and DM5. I would like to thank Penon Audio and BGVP for this review unit. As of now, you can buy the DM5 from https://penonaudio.com/BGVP-DM5 . In this review, I will provide my impressions on it.
Specifications
Unboxing & Accessories
The BGVP DM5 comes in a package with a black protective cover that sports the BGVP logo and name. At the bottom of the cover front, there are words – “THE BEST EXPERIENCE”. At the bottom of the cover back, there is a sticker showing the specifications of the iem. Finally, the cover side is similar to the cover front except that the logo, name and slogan are all packed closely together.
Front of Cover
Back of Cover
Side of Cover
After removing the cover, you get a black gift box with both the brand name and logo on the front. Next, the box lid is taken out and you will see the iem and a small paper box containing the accessories.
Front of Box
After Opening Box
Accessories
The accessories are quite sufficient. You get 2 packs of silicone tips, 1 pair of foam tips, 1 microphone cable and 1 shirt clip. I feel it could be better with a soft carrying case.
Black Silicone Tips (S, M, L from Left to Right)
White Silicone Tips (S, M, L from Left to Right)
Foam Tips
Shirt Clip
Instruction Manual
Cable With Microphone
The material being used to make this cable is oxygen-free copper. The cable has mmcx connectors with Left and Right markings on the matte black housing to indicate the respective side. The y-splitter is silver in colour. Lastly, the 3.5mm gold plated jack has a silver housing with strain relief.
Connectors
Microphone
Y-Splitter
Jack
IEM Build & Design
The iem has a metal shell in gunmetal colour. The left side of the iem has a L marking near the socket and words - “ Four Drivers” below the marking. Similarly, on the right side of the iem, there is a R marking near the socket with the model name, “BGVP DM5” below the marking too. The nozzle is slightly angled in a jet black colour. There is metal mesh on it for earwax prevention. On the faceplate of the iem, there are 5 vents. I believe this open design helps to enhance the sound. Overall, I find the build on the iem solid and there is a premium feel to it.
Cable Build & Design
The material being used to make this cable is silver-plated oxygen-free copper. The cable is quite flexible and soft. It has a shiny look. The mmcx connectors are the same as the cable with microphone. There are markings on both sides to indicate left and right. The chin slider and y-splitter are matte black in colour and rectangular in shape. The jack is right angled with strain relief. It is 3.5mm gold plated with a matte black housing.
Connectors
Chin Slider & Y-Splitter
Jack
Sound Analysis
Lows
The DM5 sub-bass is extended decently. Although it does not go rather deep, there is a fast rumble. The mid-bass is laid back and it is not authoritative at all. The bass operates in a clinical manner as the decay is quick and the bass note presents itself cleanly. In addition, I feel the bass adds some body for the transition to the midrange to prevent the lower mids from being too lean. The bass quantity is just right for me but the texture could be better rendered. The bass is clean and tight but could be better with more extension.
Mids
The DM5 midrange is the highlight. The lower mids has a good amount of body to it. The upper mids are quite forward. The midrange operates in a warm and smooth manner and the details retrieval is above average. The resolution is average with a good layering. It is a midrange that is not offensive and you can enjoy the music. I have experienced some iems with shouty mids and I find them quite hard to listen to. Luckily, for the DM5, the midrange is not shouty. The midrange is soothing and great for vocals.
Highs
The treble is extended to a decent extent. I find the treble is very smooth and there is not much energy to it although there is a slight sparkle. There is no sibilance and harshness. The amount of air is above average and it helps to give vocals a light presentation. I would not say that it is very clinical but there are details. The treble is quite clean and there is definition to it. There is a slight crisp to it and I feel you can put SpinFit tips to enhance it. To sum up, I find the treble rather conservative with good clarity.
Soundstage
The DM5 has average width and depth for the soundstage. The expansion is decent and it helps in the imaging. Positioning of instruments and vocals are quite accurate and layering is average. The sound is not congested.
Comparisons
BGVP DM5 vs BGVP SGZ DN1
The sub-bass quantity is more on the DN1 but the extension is better on the DM5. DM5 is better in the bass quality as it is being articulated with more precision. The mid-bass of the DN1 has more quantity but lacks the quality in the DM5. Bass quantity is better on the DN1 but for quality, the DM5 is more superior. The bass texture on the DM5 is more defined and each bass note is more clear with faster decay. The lower mids on the DN1 is much thicker than the DM5 and it makes the sound more dense. This slows the overall nature of the sound. The upper mids of DM5 is more forward and organic. The details retrieval of DM5 is better than the DN1. For the treble section, DM5 has more air and presents it in a clinical manner. In addition, there is a higher level of details retrieval in the DM5. The DM5 excels in both the width and depth of soundstage. Instrument positioning on the DM5 is more precise along with its resolution.
BGVP DM5 vs Fidue A65
The DM5 has less sub-bass quantity and extension than the A65. The A65 is more superior as the bass digs deeper. The mid-bass of A65 has more punch to it and it helps in the presentation being more dynamic. The bass texture of DM5 is being rendered more smoothly. Bass note on the A65 is presented with more authority and the decay is faster. The lower mids on the DM5 has more body than the A65 and sounds thicker. It is more smooth too. For the upper mids, the DM5 and A65 are around the same but A65 has the edge as it is more forward. In the treble section, DM5 And A65 has similar extension and clarity. DM5 has slightly more air and details A65 has more sparkle. DM5 and A65 has similar soundstage in terms of width and depth. Instrument positioning on both is decent. The resolution is similar too.
BGVP DM5 vs Final Audio E3000
The DM5 has more sub-bass quantity and extension than the E3000. The DM5 bass is more smooth and E3000 has the edge in bass precision. Each bass note on the E3000 is articulated with more definition. I find the mid-bass slam on both approximately the same but DM5 has more quantity to it. The lower mids on the DM5 is thicker than the E3000. The upper mids on the E3000 is much more forward making it more organic. For the treble, the E3000 has the advantage as it is more airy and it renders more details. E3000 has the better width in soundstage while DM5 has the better depth. I find the instrument positioning on the E3000 to be slightly better. The resolution of E3000 is better than the DM5.
BGVP DM5 vs Hifiman RE400
The RE400 has slightly more sub-bass quantity and extension than the DM5. RE400 bass is more robust and warm while DM5 bass is more clinical. The bass articulation on the DM5 is more defined. The mid-bass of DM5 is expressed with more authority and slam while on the RE400, the mid-bass quantity helps to add more body. RE400 is warmer than the DM5. The bass note on the DM5 is more precise due to the faster bass decay. The lower mids on the RE400 is thicker. The upper mids on the DM5 is more forward and female vocals is better presented. In the treble section, the DM5 is better extended and there is more clarity. The amount of air on both is very close but RE400 has a slight edge. RE400 operates in a smooth approach while DM5 on a clinical approach. DM5 has a wider soundstage while RE400 has a better depth. Instrument positioning on the DM5 is slightly better. The resolution on both is approximately the same.
BGVP DM5 vs TFZ Exclusive 3
The DM5 has similar sub-bass quantity and extension as the Exclusive 3. Exclusive 3 has more body to it and it is warmer. The DM5 bass is tighter with a quicker decay. There is a slow rumble on the Exclusive 3. The way DM5 tackles the bass section is more clinical and each bass note is presented very clearly. The mid-bass on the Exclusive 3 has more weight and it adds more dynamics to the presentation. The lower mids on the Exclusive 3 has more body and the male vocals excel better. The upper mids on both are equally forward but DM5 has a better control and vocals sound more clean. In the treble department, DM5 has a better extension and there is details. The Exclusive 3 has more air to it and helps to lighten the its warmth. The treble on the DM5 is more precise with better articulation. DM5 has a wider soundstage while Exclusive 3 has more depth. The width helps to enhance the instruments and vocals positioning. Layering and separation is slightly better on the DM5. The resolution of DM5 is better as the sound has more definition to it.
Conclusion
The BGVP DM5 is a sweet sounding iem that does not overdo any frequency range. Although it can do with more sub-bass extension, the details retrieval is excellent at this price point. It has warm bass, smooth midrange and clinical treble. In addition, the DM5 scales with source, With the extra microphone cable, you can use the DM5 to pick up calls too. This provides very good value.
For more reviews, visit https://audio123blog.wordpress.com/ .
BGVP is a Chinese brand that produces in-ear monitors (iems). They are known for their Sidy iems and have produced other iems such as YSP04 and DGS100. Recently, they have released 2 new iems – SGZ DN1 and DM5. I would like to thank Penon Audio and BGVP for this review unit. As of now, you can buy the DM5 from https://penonaudio.com/BGVP-DM5 . In this review, I will provide my impressions on it.
Specifications
- Model: BGVP DM5
- Driver: 2 Balanced Armature + 2 Graphene Composite Dynamic Driver
- Sensitivity: 120Db/mW
- Impedance: 16 ohms
- Frequency response: 10 Hz - 40000 Hz
- Cable Length: 1.2m
Unboxing & Accessories
The BGVP DM5 comes in a package with a black protective cover that sports the BGVP logo and name. At the bottom of the cover front, there are words – “THE BEST EXPERIENCE”. At the bottom of the cover back, there is a sticker showing the specifications of the iem. Finally, the cover side is similar to the cover front except that the logo, name and slogan are all packed closely together.
Front of Cover
Back of Cover
Side of Cover
After removing the cover, you get a black gift box with both the brand name and logo on the front. Next, the box lid is taken out and you will see the iem and a small paper box containing the accessories.
Front of Box
After Opening Box
Accessories
The accessories are quite sufficient. You get 2 packs of silicone tips, 1 pair of foam tips, 1 microphone cable and 1 shirt clip. I feel it could be better with a soft carrying case.
Black Silicone Tips (S, M, L from Left to Right)
White Silicone Tips (S, M, L from Left to Right)
Foam Tips
Shirt Clip
Instruction Manual
Cable With Microphone
The material being used to make this cable is oxygen-free copper. The cable has mmcx connectors with Left and Right markings on the matte black housing to indicate the respective side. The y-splitter is silver in colour. Lastly, the 3.5mm gold plated jack has a silver housing with strain relief.
Connectors
Microphone
Y-Splitter
Jack
IEM Build & Design
The iem has a metal shell in gunmetal colour. The left side of the iem has a L marking near the socket and words - “ Four Drivers” below the marking. Similarly, on the right side of the iem, there is a R marking near the socket with the model name, “BGVP DM5” below the marking too. The nozzle is slightly angled in a jet black colour. There is metal mesh on it for earwax prevention. On the faceplate of the iem, there are 5 vents. I believe this open design helps to enhance the sound. Overall, I find the build on the iem solid and there is a premium feel to it.
Cable Build & Design
The material being used to make this cable is silver-plated oxygen-free copper. The cable is quite flexible and soft. It has a shiny look. The mmcx connectors are the same as the cable with microphone. There are markings on both sides to indicate left and right. The chin slider and y-splitter are matte black in colour and rectangular in shape. The jack is right angled with strain relief. It is 3.5mm gold plated with a matte black housing.
Connectors
Chin Slider & Y-Splitter
Jack
Sound Analysis
Lows
The DM5 sub-bass is extended decently. Although it does not go rather deep, there is a fast rumble. The mid-bass is laid back and it is not authoritative at all. The bass operates in a clinical manner as the decay is quick and the bass note presents itself cleanly. In addition, I feel the bass adds some body for the transition to the midrange to prevent the lower mids from being too lean. The bass quantity is just right for me but the texture could be better rendered. The bass is clean and tight but could be better with more extension.
Mids
The DM5 midrange is the highlight. The lower mids has a good amount of body to it. The upper mids are quite forward. The midrange operates in a warm and smooth manner and the details retrieval is above average. The resolution is average with a good layering. It is a midrange that is not offensive and you can enjoy the music. I have experienced some iems with shouty mids and I find them quite hard to listen to. Luckily, for the DM5, the midrange is not shouty. The midrange is soothing and great for vocals.
Highs
The treble is extended to a decent extent. I find the treble is very smooth and there is not much energy to it although there is a slight sparkle. There is no sibilance and harshness. The amount of air is above average and it helps to give vocals a light presentation. I would not say that it is very clinical but there are details. The treble is quite clean and there is definition to it. There is a slight crisp to it and I feel you can put SpinFit tips to enhance it. To sum up, I find the treble rather conservative with good clarity.
Soundstage
The DM5 has average width and depth for the soundstage. The expansion is decent and it helps in the imaging. Positioning of instruments and vocals are quite accurate and layering is average. The sound is not congested.
Comparisons
BGVP DM5 vs BGVP SGZ DN1
The sub-bass quantity is more on the DN1 but the extension is better on the DM5. DM5 is better in the bass quality as it is being articulated with more precision. The mid-bass of the DN1 has more quantity but lacks the quality in the DM5. Bass quantity is better on the DN1 but for quality, the DM5 is more superior. The bass texture on the DM5 is more defined and each bass note is more clear with faster decay. The lower mids on the DN1 is much thicker than the DM5 and it makes the sound more dense. This slows the overall nature of the sound. The upper mids of DM5 is more forward and organic. The details retrieval of DM5 is better than the DN1. For the treble section, DM5 has more air and presents it in a clinical manner. In addition, there is a higher level of details retrieval in the DM5. The DM5 excels in both the width and depth of soundstage. Instrument positioning on the DM5 is more precise along with its resolution.
BGVP DM5 vs Fidue A65
The DM5 has less sub-bass quantity and extension than the A65. The A65 is more superior as the bass digs deeper. The mid-bass of A65 has more punch to it and it helps in the presentation being more dynamic. The bass texture of DM5 is being rendered more smoothly. Bass note on the A65 is presented with more authority and the decay is faster. The lower mids on the DM5 has more body than the A65 and sounds thicker. It is more smooth too. For the upper mids, the DM5 and A65 are around the same but A65 has the edge as it is more forward. In the treble section, DM5 And A65 has similar extension and clarity. DM5 has slightly more air and details A65 has more sparkle. DM5 and A65 has similar soundstage in terms of width and depth. Instrument positioning on both is decent. The resolution is similar too.
BGVP DM5 vs Final Audio E3000
The DM5 has more sub-bass quantity and extension than the E3000. The DM5 bass is more smooth and E3000 has the edge in bass precision. Each bass note on the E3000 is articulated with more definition. I find the mid-bass slam on both approximately the same but DM5 has more quantity to it. The lower mids on the DM5 is thicker than the E3000. The upper mids on the E3000 is much more forward making it more organic. For the treble, the E3000 has the advantage as it is more airy and it renders more details. E3000 has the better width in soundstage while DM5 has the better depth. I find the instrument positioning on the E3000 to be slightly better. The resolution of E3000 is better than the DM5.
BGVP DM5 vs Hifiman RE400
The RE400 has slightly more sub-bass quantity and extension than the DM5. RE400 bass is more robust and warm while DM5 bass is more clinical. The bass articulation on the DM5 is more defined. The mid-bass of DM5 is expressed with more authority and slam while on the RE400, the mid-bass quantity helps to add more body. RE400 is warmer than the DM5. The bass note on the DM5 is more precise due to the faster bass decay. The lower mids on the RE400 is thicker. The upper mids on the DM5 is more forward and female vocals is better presented. In the treble section, the DM5 is better extended and there is more clarity. The amount of air on both is very close but RE400 has a slight edge. RE400 operates in a smooth approach while DM5 on a clinical approach. DM5 has a wider soundstage while RE400 has a better depth. Instrument positioning on the DM5 is slightly better. The resolution on both is approximately the same.
BGVP DM5 vs TFZ Exclusive 3
The DM5 has similar sub-bass quantity and extension as the Exclusive 3. Exclusive 3 has more body to it and it is warmer. The DM5 bass is tighter with a quicker decay. There is a slow rumble on the Exclusive 3. The way DM5 tackles the bass section is more clinical and each bass note is presented very clearly. The mid-bass on the Exclusive 3 has more weight and it adds more dynamics to the presentation. The lower mids on the Exclusive 3 has more body and the male vocals excel better. The upper mids on both are equally forward but DM5 has a better control and vocals sound more clean. In the treble department, DM5 has a better extension and there is details. The Exclusive 3 has more air to it and helps to lighten the its warmth. The treble on the DM5 is more precise with better articulation. DM5 has a wider soundstage while Exclusive 3 has more depth. The width helps to enhance the instruments and vocals positioning. Layering and separation is slightly better on the DM5. The resolution of DM5 is better as the sound has more definition to it.
Conclusion
The BGVP DM5 is a sweet sounding iem that does not overdo any frequency range. Although it can do with more sub-bass extension, the details retrieval is excellent at this price point. It has warm bass, smooth midrange and clinical treble. In addition, the DM5 scales with source, With the extra microphone cable, you can use the DM5 to pick up calls too. This provides very good value.
For more reviews, visit https://audio123blog.wordpress.com/ .