The RMAA (RightMark Audio Analyzer) Source and Audio Device Measurement Thread [Overview of Measurements in Post #3, Tutorial in Post #2]
Jun 9, 2017 at 1:21 AM Post #182 of 255
Stoner Acoustics UD125:


No load:

no load.jpg


All 4 Digital Filters (unloaded):

all filters.jpg

Default = minimum phase, sharp roll-off
Filter 1 = minimum phase, slow roll-off
Filter 2 = linear phase, slow roll-off
Filter 3 = linear phase, sharp roll-off


Loaded w/ Triple.Fi 10:

triplefi10.jpg

=> Excellently low output impedance of ~ 0.1 Ohms.
 
Oct 10, 2017 at 2:57 AM Post #184 of 255
JDS Labs C5D:

DAC/Amp. Phones output. Output impedance: 0.62Ω @1kHz.

No load:

Normal (no bass boost):

C5D.png


Medium and high Bass boost:

C5D-bass1-bass2.png



Pai Audio MR3:

C5D-MR3.png



Amplifying E-MU 0404 (no load):

EMU_vs_EMU-C5D.png



Pai Audio MR3:

EMU-C5D-MR3.png



RMAA:


ADC used: Creative E-MU 0404 (Z=1MΩ).
Measured C5D headphones amplifier (phones output).
Sources:
- C5D analog input (aux), amplifying E-MU 0404 DAC (line out) .
Drivers used: E-MU's ASIO.
Output voltages: 1Vrms, 1.5Vrms, 2Vrms, 3Vrms.
- C5D DAC (usb).
Drivers used: ASIO4ALL.
Output voltages: 1.060Vrms, 1.495Vrms, 2.108Vrms, 2.962Vrms.

C5D-aux+usb_rmaa.png



NOTES:
Small spikes in noise (high frequencies) come from E-MU 0404's first input channel when using 48kHz and 24bit.
Some distortion (3rd and last harmonics) come from E-MU 0404's input channels.


Noise level:

C5D-aux__noise.png


Dynamic range:

C5D-aux__dr.png


Harmonic Distortion:

C5D-aux__thd.png


Intermodulation Distortion:

C5D-aux__imd.png


Intermodulation Distortion (swept frequency):

C5D-aux__imdsf.png


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EDITED: added bass boost settings and RMAA info.
EDITED: added more RMAA info.
 
Last edited:
Oct 10, 2017 at 7:21 AM Post #185 of 255
My fuzzy brain totally forgot about this thread's existence. Thanks, @hakuzen, I've added it to the overview in post #3. Just one little addition: if it's not too much extra work for you, seeing a graph of the bass boost implementation would be nice. :)
 
Last edited:
Oct 10, 2017 at 12:54 PM Post #186 of 255
+1, C5D bass boost is really nice, would be cool to see DIY measurements. JDS own graphs show 14-16 dB max bass boost depending on gain. Their blog post on the C5D has a bunch of other measurements ( http://blog.jdslabs.com/?p=722/introducing-c5d-ampdac/ ), wish more manufacturers took a similar approach in marketing to explaining their products & engineering decisions etc...
 
Last edited:
Oct 10, 2017 at 2:10 PM Post #187 of 255
I've come to simply trust JDS when it comes to specs and measurements. they know what they're doing and have never been big on dishonest marketing game about numbers.
 
Oct 18, 2017 at 1:25 AM Post #191 of 255
Hey haku, what's the reference in those measurements (The 0dB output voltage of the device when it was measured)? So i can have an idea of the noise levels.
Didn't expect less from my meticulous teacher.. You always make me go further and learn, maestro.
Added more RMAA info about the headphones amplifier of JDS Labs C5D. Btw, in case of having to choose an unique voltage output to test, which one should be the reference?
This extra info goes beyond the purpose of the thread, but now I got decent gear to measure, wanted to tease a bit.. hope that Chris forgives me..
 
Oct 18, 2017 at 11:07 AM Post #192 of 255
Didn't expect less from my meticulous teacher.. You always make me go further and learn, maestro.
Added more RMAA info about the headphones amplifier of JDS Labs C5D. Btw, in case of having to choose an unique voltage output to test, which one should be the reference?
This extra info goes beyond the purpose of the thread, but now I got decent gear to measure, wanted to tease a bit.. hope that Chris forgives me..

Either dBUu(0.775V) or dBV (1V) could be used, however smartphones may not be able to reach those voltages. I would always go for dBV and state the reference when that's not possible.

Jds specs -105 dBu (4.3 uVrms) for the headphone amp and -103 dBu (5.4 uVrms) for the dac, Your measurements show 5.9 uVrms for the dac and 5.8 uVrms for the amp. Which is very nice and close to the official specs.

If these measurements were unloaded, adding an small load (10K Ohm) to the c5d may make the noise figures even lower, the E-MU has a high input impedance and its susceptible to noise.
 
Oct 18, 2017 at 11:21 AM Post #193 of 255
I personally use 0 dBu, because 0 dBV is the output limit of many small DAPs or smartphones or even not reached at all as @Samueru Sama already said.

Here are my results for the JDS Labs C5D (DAC) at 0 dBu with no load and 30 ohm load, performed with a RME ADI-2 Pro:

C5D.PNG


So about 2.7 uVrms which is even better than JDS specs. The ADI's input noise is at about -114 to -115 dBu btw.
 
Oct 18, 2017 at 11:55 AM Post #194 of 255
Either dBUu(0.775V) or dBV (1V) could be used, however smartphones may not be able to reach those voltages. I would always go for dBV and state the reference when that's not possible.

Jds specs -105 dBu (4.3 uVrms) for the headphone amp and -103 dBu (5.4 uVrms) for the dac, Your measurements show 5.9 uVrms for the dac and 5.8 uVrms for the amp. Which is very nice and close to the official specs.

If these measurements were unloaded, adding an small load (10K Ohm) to the c5d may make the noise figures even lower, the E-MU has a high input impedance and its susceptible to noise.
good catch, the emu 0404's line-in is specced at 1Mohm (add your favorite "your mama" joke). I always assumed ADC line inputs were around 10kohm for some reason because that's always what I've had on mine(real line-in, not crap mic-in from my laptop).
 
Oct 19, 2017 at 1:47 AM Post #195 of 255
gotcha, thank you all!
i'll aim to dBu then (0.775Vrms) when possible (in case of DAPs and smartphones which use volume steps, guess nearest voltage to 0dBu will be enough, while stating it).
shall use a load of 10KΩ (as "unloaded") if using E-MU 0404, to get closer to most ADCs results, and shall measure with 16-32Ω load as well.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top