AMBIENT ACOUSTICS MAD24 & MAD16
Overview
A few months back I had a chance to demo the prototypes of the MAD24, MAD16 and MAD10 from Ambient Acoustics, to say the least, I was impressed at the time but I felt a prototype isn’t something that warrants how the final product will sound. Thankfully, Ambient Acoustics were kind enough to send over the final production models of the MAD24 and MAD16 for review.
The MAD24 and MAD16 use 24 and 16 balanced armatures per side respectively, both use a crossover-less design utilising their “Main Audio Destination” technology for phase matching and splitting of FR bands between drivers.
I rarely review multiple products at once, but in this case, the packaging, build and accessories of both of the IEMs are identical which makes it an ideal candidate for such a special review.
Thank you to Ambient Acoustics for this review opportunity.
In the box
|
- IEMs
- 1.2m 3.5mm Cable
- 3.5mm to 6.35mm adapter
- Case
- Cleaning cloth
- 3 pairs of silicone tips
- Case for tips
|
Build quality and accessories
Let us start with the IEMs themselves. The faceplates are beautiful, whether you like the design or not. It’s clear there was some thought put into making them look the way they do.
The rest of the shell is quite generic, the plastic it’s made out of feels solid and all edges are nicely polished for a seamless transition between the shell and the faceplates. Each shell has a serial number and side engraved on it, somehow this makes them feel a bit more unique than just a printed serial number under the lacquer.
The case is solid, while the design isn’t flashy or innovative the execution is very good. Not only it provides a good amount of protection in terms of how crush-resistance, but it is also lined with a thicker soft material that should prevent scratching. It also came with a big desiccant to help with any moisture.
If there’s an elephant in the room, this is definitely it, the cable. Getting IEMs that cost multiple thousands I generally don’t expect the cable to be as good as aftermarket offerings, but, I also expect something better than the cable provided here. The plugs are cheap, they look like they have been taken some generic cables thrown in with a 30$ set of IEMs. The wire itself is soft and as long as it doesn’t oxidise quickly I don’t have an issue with it.
I have spoken about this to Ambient Acoustics, they have assured me they will upgrade the plugs to something better in the coming months.
In general, the accessories are average considering the price point those two models come at, an improved cable (or multiple cables) would be a good start.
Fit and comfort
The shells of the IEMs are shaped well, albeit for me a bit too aggressively in terms of the part going into the “cymba concha” part of the ear. For me they were never quite comfortable, I could use them for a couple of hours at a time but then I’d get discomfort in the area mentioned above. Part of that comes from the fact the shells are very large, I can’t really hold that against Ambient Acoustics, they managed to fit 24 and 16 drivers into an IEM which is a feat of itself. I wish the nozzle was smaller too, a lot of tips don’t fit them due to not being able to be stretched onto the nozzle.
Sound
The part everyone came here for, the sound.
The MAD24 is a variation of a neutral/natural tuning, without being dull or lifeless in the process.
The MAD16 is more of a warm IEM with a richer and thicker presentation.
Bass
MAD24: Fast, punchy yet never dry. This is one of the rare cases where BA bass is done right, with just the right amount of decay and attack to feel snappy but not artificial. The extension is fantastic, listening to “Bonefield – Window” the initial notes have a good amount of weight and don’t fall off when going into the deep subbass region. They also manage to do something quite rare, they make the bass sound “big” as if it wasn’t produced by a small driver.
MAD16: Slightly slower but more weighty and rich. While MAD24 can keep up with pretty much everything you throw at it, the MAD16 can, especially at slightly higher volume get a little bit overwhelmed on things like “Hans Zimmer – Mountains” crescendo where there’s a lot of instruments, really high dynamic range with a lot of nuances. Don’t get me wrong, it still performs like an extremely good IEM, but it does fall behind its big brother.
Midrange
MAD24: Again, those show that “balanced armature timbre” is just a question of implementation rather than an inherent issue. They, at least to me, get rid of it completely. The midrange is detailed, smooth yet textured with extremely good layering and presence. They lean towards a neutral presentation while still being articulate and showing everything in the mix with clarity. Listening to “Pink Floyd – On The Run” reveals everything that’s effortlessly hidden in that busy mix.
MAD16: Similar to the MAD24, the MAD16 doesn’t suffer from the “BA timbre”. It has a richer and warmer timbre than the MAD24 with a bit more body injected into each instrument and vocal. While I can tell they aren’t quite as resolving as the MAD24, they are more of a pleasure listen. Vocals on “Fleetwood Mac – The Chain” are rich and smooth without clouding the other instruments.
Treble
MAD24: Extremely fast and detailed, with a great sparkle. Those are one of the smoothest yet most detailed IEMs I’ve heard, usually those super high detail IEMs tend to be fatiguing, MAD24 doesn’t do that, it presents the detail in a smooth yet clear manner. It comes down to how effortless it is in doing so, nothing is forced, everything is just there. The timbre is also very good.
MAD16. Here’s where the difference between the two is the biggest in terms of technicalities, the MAD16 feels like it doesn’t quite have the same extension and detail retrieval as the MAD24. That’s not to say it’s bad, far from that, it still has a ton of detail, but comparing the two side by side there’s a clear difference. To me, the cymbals on the MAD16 had a bit too slow of a decay which sometimes made them sound a bit crowded, especially on busy metal tracks like “Judas Priest – Painkiller” (intro drum solo).
Imaging and Soundstage
MAD24: Vast soundstage with an ability to get really close and intimate when needed. Extremely precise imaging within a sphere around the head rather than just in 2 dimensions. Thanks to the amount of air it also maintains a clear separation between instruments witch help the stage feel vast even more.
MAD16: About 70-80% of the stage of the MAD24, still relatively big for an IEM, but due to a warmer and richer natural with less air it doesn’t have that grand nature. It can, however, present certain tracks with a greater sense of intimacy than the MAD24 do.
Conclusion
Do I then recommend the MAD24 and MAD16? In terms of sound, wholeheartedly yes, both of them are distinct, extremely well-performing IEMs with a crazy amount of cool technology inside.
What makes it more difficult to recommend is the fit and somewhat limited accessories. The IEMs are big, really big, so they definitely won’t fit everyone and the whole package needs a bit more “value” added to it to feel like a 3500$ (MAD24) or 2500$ (MAD16).
I would love to compare the universal fit to the custom fit and see how much better those IEMs can get.