Reviews by mark2410
Pros: A sure-fire entry level crowd pleaser. Stupid easy to drive. Sound great.
Cons: Too easy to drive. Treble can be hard and unforgiving.
Rock Jaw Audio Clarito Quick Review by mark2410
 
Thanks to Rock Jaw Audio for the sample.
 
Full review here http://www.head-fi.org/t/816943/rock-jaw-audio-clarito-review-by-mark2410
 
Brief:  Rock party drama.
 
Price £24 or about US$32
 
Specifications:  Drivers: 8mm dynamic, Compatible with iOS / Android / Windows Smartphones, Impedance: 16Ω, Sensitivity: 108+/-3db, Frequency response: 20 – 20000Hz, Cord Length: 1.2M, Jack type: Gold plated 3.5mm (right angle jack), Eartips included: (S/M/L) silicone
 
Accessories:  4 pairs of silicone tips, a shirt clip and a baggy to keep them safe.
 
Build Quality:  Very nice.  The cable I think feels especially nice to the touch, slightly thick, rubberised yet very flexible.  They look nicely put together, all very neat.  Oh and yeah, sturdy metal buds.
 
Isolation Rather good for a dynamic, quite sufficient for normal, out and about, on a bus type stuff.  Tube and flights would probably be okay too.  So that means you really wont, music playing or not, notice traffic before it kills you.  Eyes people.
 
Comfort/Fit:  Great on both accounts.  In they went and done.  Acoustically a touch tiring though.
 
Aesthetics:  I like them, they look like bare metal, a sort of gun metal but with some faint hint of a blueish twinge to them.  Very nice.
 
Sound:  Very good.  They are quite the little exuberant beasts though, they love to take a song and go wild with it.  Quite noticeably with the bassline, even when they may seem at first to be not a particularly bassy IEM.  Then something comes on and pow, the bass seems to come out from nowhere and start tearing the place up.  In much more sedate, vocal centric tracks the bass stays in its place, polite, gently accompanying things content as you like.  It’s quite a curious behaviour.   The Clarito with this presentation it trying to be all things to all men and its doing a pretty good job of it too.  it’s not a specialist in any particular area but it’s very WWWW drama filled and willing to try to do everything with an abundance of enthusiasm.  It is also very notably sensitive and easy to drive.  A little flick of the volume dial and your deafen yourself.  Even out of my Nexus 5 they went stupid loud with ease.  Actually they benefited from additional impedance to sedate their acoustic mania.  There just want to throw every bit of energy, pouring their heart and soul in whatever they are playing back, be it poptastic charty stuff or soft jazz.  Thrilling, exciting, wild, dynamic, dazzling, maybe a bit too dazzling.  That treble it hard edged, cutting on the initial impact if you pair it with a hard or cold source.  A little warming, as is rather common with phones actually, does them a little bit of nudging in the direction of smooth.  However these retain gobs of enthusiasim and dynamics whatever you do to them.  Thrilling and fun, would make for a great, entry point for those who want all of the musical everything.
 
Value:  Great.  Sound fab, look fab, cost cheap.
 
Pro’s:  A sure-fire entry level crowd pleaser.  Stupid easy to drive.  Sound great.
 
Con’s:  Too easy to drive.  Treble can be hard and unforgiving.
Cinder
Cinder
@eldus I've gotten the Alfa Genus V2 and it's built like a tank. If you ever want to go Rock Jaw again, I'd recommend them. I use them as my workout IEMs.
Rock Jaw Audio
Rock Jaw Audio
Hi mark2410, thanks for such a straight to the point review! We'd love to see something like this for our new Resonate and we've just opened up a review tour
Brave Heart
Brave Heart
I was looking for a new pair of "beaters" for occasions when I didn't want to risk my more expensive earphones e.g. the gym and outdoor activities, and this review sold these to me.
Pros: Bass is mental. Super fun to play with. Wooo party time!!!
Cons: Bass is always in play and dominant. Needs power to be their best.
Rhapsodio Clipper Earphone Quick Review by mark2410
 
Thanks to Rhapsodiostore for the sample.
 
Full review here http://www.head-fi.org/t/816867/rhapsodio-clipper-earphone-review-by-mark2410
 
Brief:  Clearly all about the bass.
 
Price:  US$55 or about £42
 
Specification:  Erm, I dunno.
 
Accessories:  3 pairs of silicone ear tips and a rather nice little case.
 
Build Quality:  It appears to be rather good, I can find no fault visually nor by touch.  Bit light but then they are all plastic.  Removable cable though with is nice.
 
Isolation:  For a dynamic it’s really quite good.  They are pretty well sealed (enough to get driver flex) but the upside is good for everywhere, even the odd Tube commute or flight.  Naturally it means way more than enough to make yourself an organ donor of you don’t look where you’re going.
 
Comfort/Fit:  Great.  They sit rather shallow but I was fine with that and aside from a second or two for the air pressure to equalise I was all good.
 
Aesthetics:  I like the look, clear but frosted plastic.  It looks good, if not borderline great.  I like the zebra cable too.
 
Sound:  Bassy.  High quantity, high quality bass.  The one caveat is that it doesn’t truly shine unless you power them well, in which case they are super fun, bass cannons.  The trouble there though is if you have a source that’s good enough to make them there best you are possibly buying something more expensive than this.  Not that they are hard to drive, your crappy phone will do it, make them loud too, it just won’t make them be the best they can.  That would be a shame too.  Now these are sort of the rough sound signature I like, big bass, good mids, tame treble.  It’s just they’re a more dramatically sloped slant than id normally like.  They are too bass, lol, big, crazy town bassy.  When you don’t power them that well the bass is rather mediocre in its quality but should you pair them, power them well, the bass kicks it up a very significant notch in terms of quality.  Sure there is way too much but its stonkingly good.  Energetic, potent, it’s got so much vigour to it.  I do find that if I listen for ears out it wears me out but in smaller doses its super fun.   Crazy, wild, prolific, bass party cannons.  Yet with pretty damn good quality.  Still the quantity, lol it literally has me laughing at the abundance and the proclivity it has to kick you in the ear drums.  It’s a right little beast of a thing, truly a little beast of a thing where the bass is concerned.  The mids are pretty good, little lower favouring and not really much airiness to them.  The treble, well they are really quite subdued which is perfectly fine for my ears but you know, treble fans won’t love them.  Also proper music, things well recorded and mastered like acoustic classical, can sound rather skewed.
 
Value:  Great.  They need paired well to be their best bet they are fab when you do.
 
Pro’s:  Bass is mental.  Super fun to play with.  Wooo party time!!!
 
Con’s:  Bass is always in play and dominant.  Needs power to be their best.
Hisoundfi
Hisoundfi
"Organ Donor" haha, these are the comments that make your reviews very entertaining and why I will always continue to read them. Cheers buddy
Pros: Acoustically near perfection. Disturbingly cheap.
Cons: Too much upper end energy. Can be fussy with its musical pairings.
HiFiMAN HE-350 Headphone Quick Review by mark2410
 
Thanks to Massdrop for the loaner.
 
Full review here http://www.head-fi.org/t/816751/hifiman-he-350-headphone-review-by-mark2410
 
Brief:  HiFiMAN and Massdrop make uber cheap audiophile headphone.
 
Price:  US$100 or about £76
 
Specification:  Driver: 50 mm dynamic, Impedance: 50 ohm, Sensitivity: 93 dB at 1 mW, Frequency response: 15 Hz – 22 kHz, Velour ear pads, Detachable cable, Cable length: 53 in (135 cm), Cup connectors: 0.1 in (2.5 mm), Plug: ⅛ in (3.5 mm), Weight, with cable: 12.1 oz (343 g), Weight, without cable: 10.6 oz (301 g)
 
Accessories:  Errr, a cardboard box for the kids/pets to play with?
 
Build Quality:  Very nice.  Despite its dirt cheap prices its nicely made, looks good and feels good.
 
Isolation:  None.
 
Comfort/Fit:  On and seated instantly, comfort, mostly pretty great.  That upper acoustic spike though did get tiring.  They also just made contact with my ear so after a few hours got wearing.
 
Aesthetics:  Actually, you know they look really good.  You’d never guess their price form their looks.  Not that any one will ever see them as they are indoor only cans but, hey, you’ll look at them.
 
Sound:  Great.  Well mostly great, I mean these are audiophile tuned.  There is bass there but it is of a wonderfully high quality at the expense of its quantity.  That means there isn’t much of it.  It is tuned for acoustically perfect classical works.  There it shines, it does some glorious double bass bass, not Miss Minaj when she pulls up her Jag and goes “Dun-d-d-dun-dun-d-d-dun-dun” no sir, these won’t be having any of that.  Of course you can play chavy pop but you probably won’t.  The mids, almost as great as the bass but this time we’ve got a better quantity.  Once more it’s perfect for strings and naturally produced sounds.  Vocals can be a tiny bit dried but for all intents, these are tuned to be acoustically perfect.  Until you reach the upper vocal ranges, into the treble.  There is a great old spike and these have the most laser like focused like sibilant point.  It’s so fine, so lethally razor sharp its more like that of the world’s finest samurai sword.  So polite, so refined, then with you barely noticing the blade is unsheathed and cleft you in two.  Once more if you stick to acoustic, no artificial sounds and its superb.  For classical it is staggeringly good and it is something every potential audiophile ought to hear if not possess.  However be aware that its upper end while perhaps it’s Ety ER4-B like technically perfect, its ear ravaging.  You play loudness war produced stuff, cheap pop, hard abrasive stuff and it can be exhausting.  The HE-350 while a true marvel is not a can for all seasons nor all styles.  Yes it’s utterly magnificent but proceed with caution.
 
Value:  Just buy one.  Tbh I expect these will go second hand for more than their new price due to lack of availability.
 
Pro’s:  Acoustically near perfection.  Disturbingly cheap.
 
Con’s:  Too much upper end energy.  Can be fussy with its musical pairings.
  • Like
Reactions: tarhana
mark2410
mark2410
well the thing to keep in mind is they are audiophile tuned, even a little bright.  if someone comes to headfi thinking that their Beats are good then they will find the 350 extremely bass light.  same thing happened with the RE-0 headfi went crazy when they dropped to $100 and new users found their bass level a shock.
TinkerToyTech
TinkerToyTech
Thank you, a bit of light bass can be easily taken care of with a touch of eq, having an open soundstage for fine listening is a good thing.   I tend to like the top end of JBL speakers and the tonal quality of Electrovoice bottom end.  Having the extended top end and good sound staging will put you in the room.  For example, you are not going to listen to a choral arraignment on a set of DJ Mixing Headphones, which will pound the bass beats and snap on a snare and tophat is desired if not required.   Thank you for the review and followup.
-TinkerToyTech
Mr Rick
Mr Rick
I got my HE-350s from Massdrop a couple of days ago and have been giving them a listen on all my favorite gendres.  As a senior with age related high frequency hearing loss, I find the brightness described by many to be much to my liking.  I like to delegate each of the cans in my collection to a specific gendre. The HE-350s are towards the top of the list in the Classical music category, IMHO. They are a welcome addition to my collection and are more then worth the $99.00.
Pros: Sound Excellent. Acoustically very multi-talented. Look great.
Cons: That treble takes no prisoners if you feed it crap. It’s power hungry.
MEE audio Pinnacle P1 Earphone Quick Review by mark2410
 
Thanks to MEE audio for the sample
 
Full review here http://www.head-fi.org/t/816397/mee-audio-pinnacle-p1-earphone-review-by-mark2410
 
Brief:  MEE takes aim at the big boys.
 
Price :  US$200 or £180 (though I did also spot for £155)
 
Specifications:  driver type moving coil (dynamic) with copper-clad aluminum voice coil, driver size 10 mm, frequency response 20 Hz to 20 kHz, impedance 50 Ohms at 1 kHz, sensitivity 96±3 dB (1mW at 1 kHz), Microphone Specifications, directivity           omnidirectional, frequency response 100 Hz to 5 kHz, sensitivity -40dB± 3dB, Product Details, ear coupling intraaural (in-ear), cable length 51 inches (130 cm), detachable, cable connectors MMCX, cable plug 3.5 mm, right angle, weight (without cable)             0.4 oz (13 g), weight 1 oz (29 g)
 
Accessories:  stereo audio cable, headset cable, shirt clip, silicone ear tips (6 pairs), Comply foam ear tips (3 pairs), ¼” adapter, carrying case
 
Build Quality:  It would appear to be rather excellent.  The buds look are feel very nice as do the cables.  Notable that the cables are all user replaceable so if you do manage to kill them, new cable and your away again.
 
Isolation:  Excellent.  For a dynamic, these isolate like a good BA does which is very, very rare in a dynamic based IEM.  You could easily use these for out and about, on a bus, a Tube commute or long flight.  Naturally that means you won’t hear the instrument of your death until its by bone conduction.  Remember people, you need to watch where you’re going near traffic.
 
Comfort/Fit:  Great.  Despite being sealed dynamics I had no driver flex, no air pressure issues, nothing.  In they went and I was done.  Happy to wear all day long.
 
Aesthetics:  They look pretty damn lush if you ask me.  Now I have seen prettier earphones but not many.  These look as good as they feel in your hard.
 
Sound:  Wonderful.  They are really rather generalist in their nature being able to turn their hand instantly, and with equal skill to anything.  They are very natural sounding in their balance, so that means they are boosted to compensate for human perceptions.  Never bass dominant though.  The mids are a little back a way but their clarity is outstanding, faintly dry, but their instrument separation makes them stand alone, so much direct clarity.  The space to breathe properly too, give such an open feel to vocals.  The treble, oh they do rather shine a bit here.  Not just because they like to be a smidge bright, they have that metallic enclosure and there is a highly crisp metallic bight to the initial note impact.  For me these while most impressive, was a little edgy, a little hard on my delicate ears.  So I felt the need to stick to slightly warmer sources and only to tracks with high bit rates and well mastered treble.  A bright source and low bit rate crap, yeah you really don’t want to do that.  However given their price you will want to be feeding them well anyway.  On that subject, you’ll also want to feed them lots of power.  These are high impedance for an IEM and relatively insensitive.  They still sound good out of your crappy phone but seriously, feed them well and you’ll be generously rewarded.
 
Value:  Lovely.  Sure they aren’t super cheap but you get a great bundle, a great product not just in its physical build quality but in its acoustic talents.  It is a very talented little thing and it can play on the same field with other earphones that cost considerably more.
 
Pro’s:  Sound Excellent.  Acoustically very multi-talented.  Look great.
 
Con’s:  That treble takes no prisoners if you feed it crap.  It’s power hungry.
Pros: Love the carry case. Great value. Mature sounding balance.
Cons: Err yeah that design pattern, it’s not doing it for me.
Bluedio AS-BT Bluetooth Speaker Quick Review by mark2410
 
Thanks to Bluedio for the sample.  (Amazon UK Store)
 
Full review here http://www.head-fi.org/t/816148/bluedio-as-bt-bluetooth-speaker-review-by-mark2410
 
Brief:  A curious looking up, grown up little speaker.
 
Price:  £46 or US$80
 
Specifications:  Bluetooth version: 4.1, Bluetooth transmission frequency: 2.4GHz to 2.48GHz, Bluetooth operating range: about 10 meters (free space), Bluetooth profiles: A2DP, AVRCP, HSP, HFP, Frequency response: 10Hz-22,000Hz, Audio output power: 2*5W, Audio input: VRMS¡Ü1V, Audio resolution: 24 Bit/48KHz, SNR: 96dB, Dynamic range: 96dB, Standby time: 1000 hours, Music/talk time: 5 hours, Charging time: 3-5 hours for full charge, Operating temperature range: -10 ¡æ to 50¡æ only, Speaker dimensions: 249*74*69mm, Package dimensions: 280*160*95mm, Speaker weight: 702g, Package weight: 1381g
 
Accessories:  USB charging cable, 3.5mm audio cable, Carrying bag, User manual
 
Build Quality:  Seems good, very solid, no flexing even when trying to and the grill likewise, rock solid.
 
Aesthetics:  Yeah, that design.  It’s the world as a map made up of the countries names.  So short name but big place Canada looks huge. The rest of the world, err mostly looks just a mess.  I’m told its cool but I can’t say I’m a fan.  I’d rather the whole thing was just black.
 
Battery Life:  I’m sure I got about 6 and half hours out of but it’s only quoted at 5.  Go figure.
 
Sound:  You would expect from a little speaker that it’s going to try it’s all to be a little bass monster.  Of course its “bass” would be entirely mid/bass humpyness but it would be chav pleasing.  However that is not what they do at all.  They don’t try to boost up the bass, try to force its output and give up any semblance of quality or dignity.  They gracefully accept they can’t do deep prolific bass and don’t try to.  They instead focus on the areas where they can shine, notable the mid-range.  It’s really rather good.  The tonality is very pleasing.  Acoustic heavy tracks sound really impressive on it, for such a little speaker, it does an exemplary job offering a sound like a mature speaker should.  Its treble, that can get a little bit hot if you’re on axis, i.e. if it’s pointing at your face, but otherwise its quite detailed and crisp.  Perhaps a little too crisp but if you are well off axis that melts away.  Acoustically this is a small, portable speaker that has been made for grownups with a more civilised musical repertoire.  You stick to vocal centric, acoustic, no artificial lows and highs, then you’ll get a really impressive little rendition while you relax in your soulless hotel room.  
 
Value:  It really is keenly priced and while I’d want its WiFi enabled sibling for the tiny bit extra, you can’t go wrong with this.  That is if you want a mature, grown up sounding product.  If you want “all of da bass” then this isn’t what you are looking for.
 
Pro’s:  Love the carry case.  Great value.  Mature sounding balance.
 
Con’s:  Err yeah that design pattern, it’s not doing it for me.
Pros: Sound waaaay better than they should. Stupid cheap.
Cons: Treble can be a little over eager and edgy. A bit ear squishy.
Superlux HD662 EVO Quick Review by mark2410
 
Thanks to GearBest for the sample.
 
Full review here http://www.head-fi.org/t/816129/superlux-hd662-evo-review-by-mark2410
 
Brief:  Closed, cheap and highly impressive.
 
Price:  £30 or US$40
 
Specifications:  Headset type: Dynamic, Connectivity : Wired, Application: Computer, DJ, Mobile phone, Portable Media Player, Plug Type: 3.5mm, Driver unit: 50mm, Frequency response: 10Hz-30KHz, Impedance: 32ohms, Sensitivity: 98 dB (S.P.L at 1KHz), Input Power: 200mW
 
Accessories:  1 x Superlux HD662 EVO Monitoring Headphones, 1 x 1m Audio Cable, 1 x 3m Audio Cable, 1 x 6.3mm to 3.5mm Jack Adapter, 1 x Cable Clip, 2 x Earmuff, 1 x Carry Bag, 1 x English and Chinese User Manual
 
Build Quality:  While the constriction seems good the materials are not what one might call premium.  In particular that head band strap, yeah it’s pretty el cheapo looking and feeling.  Over all while it is solid enough it’s all a pretty plasticky looking affair.
 
Isolation:  Pretty reasonable.  They are closed so they do isolate depending on how well your ears and the pods seal.  I’d say fine for out and about, probably on a bus too but Tube and flights I’d skip unless desperate.   Naturally enough to get yourself run over if you don’t look where you going near traffic, so please do remember to.
 
Comfort/Fit:  Well fit was fine and easy.  Comfort, well they are round pads so they will sit on your ears a bit and that gets tiring after a while.  Also do keep in mind that these clamp quite bit, very much more considerably than their 681 siblings.  If you want to use them all day be warned they are ear squishy.
 
Aesthetics:  From a distance they look pretty nice, up close they are what they are.  Cheap and plasticky.  So they arent what I’d call lookers but then I don’t care and if you pick headphones based on what they look like rather than what they sound like, you’re reading the wrong reviews.
 
Sound:  Wow.  Yeah while in absolute terms they may be nothing super special, their abilities are adequate, enough to be pleasing to the ear and enjoyable.  Then you take a gander at the price tag, that Super lux are pulling off this good for this price is a marvel of cheap Chinese manufacturing.  Despite their being closed they haven’t ramped up the bass, they have in fact tamed it a bit, toned it towards a bit of a middle to upper bass hump that can come out to play if provoked.  Though it does go reasonably deep but doesn’t rise up in scale as it does so, which many closed cans like to do.  The mids are rather capable too.  A little bit over shadowed but they have a nice clear focus.  They try to keep a bit of breadth and clarity which they just about pull off.  Then the treble comes in and if you power them well, that treble can really show off a bit too much.  It wants to be hard, crisp edged and do what it can to give you the air of their being lots of, errr, air.  For a closed can it has a stab at being more spacious and well, its so so.  Not bad but that treble can be a little too hot at times for me.  Pair it warm and softly though and it’s really rather impressive.  The detail retrieval and nuance is fab for this price.
 
Value:  Disturbingly good value.
 
Pro’s:  Sound waaaay better than they should.  Stupid cheap.
 
Con’s:  Treble can be a little over eager and edgy.  A bit ear squishy.
  • Like
Reactions: rocksteady65
oldson
oldson
doing the mods takes them up a level or two, too!
  • Like
Reactions: abm0
Pros: Bluetooth. Great value. Woooo Party!!! Bass.
Cons: Bass dominant. Blingy looks say “Steal me.”
Bluedio Vinyl Plus Bluetooth Headphone Quick Review by mark2410
 
Thanks to Bluedio for the sample.
 
Full review here http://www.head-fi.org/t/815097/bluedio-vinyl-plus-bluetooth-headphone-review-by-mark2410
 
Price: £150 or US$250
 
Specifications:  Bluetooth version: 4.1+EDR, Bluetooth profiles: A2DP, AVRCP, HSP, HFP, Bluetooth transmission frequency: 2.4GHz to 2.48GHz, Bluetooth operating range: up to 33 feet (free space), Drivers: Φ70mm, SPL: 116dB, Impedance: 16Ω, Frequency response: 15Hz-25,000Hz, Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) : <0.1%, Bluetooth music/talk time: about 20 hours, Standby time: up to 1100 hours, Charging time: 2 hours for full charge, Operating temperature range: -10 ℃ to 50℃ only, Headphones dimensions: 174*158*90mm, Package dimensions: 252*245*122mm, Headphones weight: 366g, Package weight: 1565g
 
Accessories:  3.5mm audio cable, Charging cable, Y cable, Cable with remote and mic, Carrying case with a buckle, Pouch for cables, User manual
 
Build Quality:  Very nice.  It’s big and eye catching twisted metal band to cup attachment is very solid feeling not to mention it looks great.  The build all appears to be of a high standard.
 
Isolation:  Not bad.  Totally fine for out and about use, even on a bus I think it would be okay so long as you don’t go crazy with the volume.  Tube and flights, well not quite what I’d want but would do in a pinch if you’ve nothing else.  Naturally that means it got more than enough for you to not hear that wheeled chariot of death hurtling your way, so do remember to use your eyes when near traffic.
 
Comfort/Fit:  Fit was easy, on and done, no fiddling.  The comfort though.  Well the pads, they are lovely and squishy but they are perfectly round and while that looks great, you know what’s not round?  My ears.  So that means that they sit on my ears at bits and that after a few hours gets wearing.  Not painful but that irritating, oppressive I want them off feeling.  Fine for an hour or two but after that my ears need a break.
 
Aesthetics:  They look great.  A little blingy maybe, that big polished metal twisting arm is rather eye catching.  I do find it rather visually pleasing, the black, the highly polished silver, it looks very nice if you ask me.
 
Sound:  These are clearly aiming for a bass centric sound, which I may find a little at odds with their name, I hear Vinyl and I think Grado like treble to counter the listeners maturing hearing response and compensating by whacking up the treble.  These aren’t that by any stretch.  They are highly bass dominant and its big, weighty, powerful bass too.  It hits like a softened pillow that is backed up by a ton of bricks.  A beguiling softened initial impact but serious power following it up.  It’s not the most nimble but it’s so super eager to hurl it and you from one side of the room to the other.  It’s so energetically enthusiastic.  You’ll do well to just go along for the ride and enjoy it.  It’s fun, its wild, it’s a bassy party cannon.  Depth is a little bit declining but you won’t be listening to pipe organ music on these so who cares.  Mids are a little warmed, a little thickened but they do have breadth to them that gives them some space.  They are clean and nicely articulate so long as you are happy to give up a bit of breathiness.  They do want to give vocals all a tiny dash of warmed cream.  The treble is rather good.  It’s quite subdued and delicate though it does have a little peak that cuts through with some clarity.  Its initial impacts are slightly softy metallic, so clear and they have a brief but most pleasant decay.  However this isn’t a can for treble heads, even pairing with a cool, dry amp the treble is never going to dominate, ever no matter how nicely a decorating it may provide.  It will forever be merely side decoration.
 
Value:  Great stuff, sure they are too bassy but oodles of fun and they are Bluetooth capable yet priced like they were just wired.  It’s a quality, big bassy fun time wireless party machine.
 
Pro’s:  Bluetooth.  Great value.  Woooo Party!!!  Bass.
 
Con’s:  Bass dominant.  Blingy looks say “Steal me.”
Pros: Incredible mid-range. Stupendously natural sounding. Superbly natural bass. Faintly mesmerising treble.
Cons: So so Isolation. Wallet ouch. Will be treble light for some.
DUNU DN-2002 Earphone Quick Review by mark2410
 
Thanks to DUNU for the sample.
 
Full review here http://www.head-fi.org/t/814641/dunu-dn-2002-earphone-review-by-mark2410
 
Brief:  DUNU makes an IEM tuned just for me.
 
Price:  £285 or US$380
 
Specification:  Type: 2 * Dynamic(10mm) + 2 * BA, Sensitivity: 106+/-2dB, Frequency Response: 10Hz-40KHz, Impedance: 10Ω, Plug Size: 3.5mm, Cord Length: 1.2m, Weight: 24g.
 
Accessories:  1 pair of Earhooks, 1 pair of Comply Foam eartips, 3 pairs of White Silicone eartips (S/M/L), 3 pairs of Spinfit eartips (S/M/L), 3.5mm Female to 6.5mm Male Adapter, Protective box, Shirt Clip
 
Build Quality:  Good.  Everything thing looks and feels good.  It is DUNU’s usual high standard but given their price while it’s very good it’s nothing exceptional or special.
 
Isolation:  Well, these are pretty vented, they do after all have two dynamic drivers in them.  The result of course means that they are not the world’s greatest isolators.  Now while more iso isn’t the same thing as “better” for me it would limit the places and situations I would feel comfortable using them.  Out and about is fine, on a bus is passable but Tube or flights not so much.  Still you’ll need to use your eyes when near traffic if you’re new to IEM’s.
 
Comfort/Fit:  They do have a bit of a weird shape but for me they worked great.  No issues at all, wearing them up I just shoved them in my ears and that was it.  I was also very, very happy to wear them for hours on end too.
 
Aesthetics:  These aren’t lookers, they are okay but nothing particularly special.  Now they aren’t ugly either but just meh, boring and just not interesting visually.
 
Sound:  I love these, love these sooooooooo very much.  They are tuned with my own personal preferences in mind and feel near perfectly matched to my own hearing curve.  Moderatly over bassy, quite middy and rather demure treble.  The bass is fast but not BA fast which is fine because BA bass can be a little soulless but here its grand, symphonically grand.  Lush, articulate and can sweep and soar gloriously yet it can give you a fairly quick punch when called upon.  It’s not the most aggressive though, every punch has a faint coating of memory foam over that granite below.  Its graceful and agile like something from Swan Lake.  No harshness, no abrasiveness nor jarring movements.  Okay so the most aggressive bass does have that aggression a tiny bit muted.  If you want TF10 GRRRRR punch you face then no.  It’s fast, it’s agile but its idea of aggressive is 2Cellos “Smooth Criminal” yeah you can tell there is aggression there but it’s still not abrasive on the ear.
 
Tonally too there is a certain preference to the likes of string originating bass, cello’s, double bass’s, everything get an instant veneer of coming from something natural.  I hate the term but everything sound so “organic” in origin.  This extends to its range and depth, so that while some IEM’s at this quality level opt to try and stay linear all the way down, which while I can accept the technical merits of, it always sounds a little unnatural.  These however happily, so naturally sounding, trail and decline as they reach down low.  They just sound so natural.
 
The mid’s are epically glorious.  The mids are seriously incredible, every vocal that comes on they instantly wash with some faintly sweet, light syrup yet creamy and light in a way that no creamy sauce could every flow so fluidly. Everything sounds wonderful.  Crap vocals sound good on these, so should you slap on some truly fantastic, world class vocals and they will just take you to another world. 
 
The Treble too is so refined, so softly genteel and with a faint shimmering sparkle.  Like the faintest and most delicate morning frost.  Which is just perfection for my treble sensitive ears.  Soooo much detail and so tantalisingly presented.  Glorious, just glorious.
 
Value:  So yeah, it’s not cheap so it’s probably not super-duper great “value” but it’s an acoustical marvel.  You want this level of quality your wallets taking a pounding, it’s that simple.
 
Pro’s:  Incredible mid-range.  Stupendously natural sounding.  Superbly natural bass.  Faintly mesmerising treble.
 
Con’s:  So so Isolation.  Wallet ouch.  Will be treble light for some.
Pros: Epic sized bass. Potently assertive bass. Good looks. Good clarity. Cheap.
Cons: Bass is very highly dominant.
Archeer AH07 Headphone Quick Review by mark2410
 
Thanks to Archeer for the sample.
 
Full review here http://www.head-fi.org/t/814334/archeer-ah07-headphone-review-by-mark2410
 
Price:  £41 (there seems to a promotion, 2KNZYW27 will get you £6 off just now) or US$60 (but there is US$11 off with the code KQ5W7MHD)
 
Specifications:  Bluetooth Version: 4.0, Talk Time: 14H, Stand-by Time: 540H, Playback Time: 14H, Operation Range: 10m/33ft, Impedance: 32Ω, Sound Pressure Level: 130±dB, Frequency Response: 20Hz-20KHz, Weight: 255.5g, Dimensions: 200*180*65mm
 
Accessories:  You get a micro USB cable and a 3.5mm male to 3.5mm male cable to use them wired.
 
Build Quality:  very nice, the fit and finish is great for something of this price.  They look nicely put together.
 
Isolation:  Well it’ll matter how good a seal you get but I didn’t get that great, thus their isolation wasn’t superb.  I’d be fine to use out and about but I think on a bus would make me that guy who’s irritating everyone around them.  That means not one for a flight or Tube commute, though better than nothing.  Remember it’s still easily sufficient to get yourself run over if you don’t use your eyes.
 
Comfort/Fit:  the fit was great, on they went and done.  Comfort, well they did sit on my ears and thusly that meant that 2 hours was about my limit before my ears wanted them off.  Not ever painful or anything but that constant pressing, the pressure made my ears need to come up for some fresh air.
 
Aesthetics:  I like them.  Their big brushed metal side band bit, it may be entirely cosmetic but hey, I’m a sucker for bare metal so cosmetic or not I liked it.  They just plain look good.  Okay so the buttons are a little plastic looking and feeling but big whoop.  The things cost 40 quid and that’s pre discount code, delivered to your door.  They may be priced el cheapo but you’d never really know it to look at them.
 
Sound:  Oh there is no getting away from the fact there are all oubt the bass.  They really are really very bassy, no, they really, really are.  Hardly a shocker that a consumer priced headphone is super bassy is it.  What’s a bit more unusual is that it’s quite good.  The bass is quite well styled, I slightly soft impact but backed up a ton of power.  The mids are recessed and overshadowed but have good clarity.  A tiny bit warmed and thickened but plenty enough resolution given its target market and perhaps more notably, for its price.  For a closed, Bluetooth, attractive headphone that costs £41 (£35 with promo code atm) that’s a cracking offering.  The bass sure it’s a bit over blown, over heavy, its shifts a whole ton of air and I find it wearing on my little ears but for bassheads its smokin’ hot stuff.  They are made for bassy poptastic chart topping stuff, where power and rhythm are considerably more important that detail and nuance.  These are boisterous and not subtle though I must credit the treble as being really quite easy on the ear. 
 
Value:  Cracking good value.  Cheap, looks great and thumping ponding bass capabilities.
 
Pro’s:  Epic sized bass.  Potently assertive bass.  Good looks.  Good clarity.  Cheap.
 
Con’s:  Bass is very highly dominant.
Pros: Bass. Bass. Bass. Great colour variety.
Cons: Bass is way over present and abundant for purists.
Bluedio U (UFO) Quick Review by mark2410
 
Thanks to Bluedio for the sample.
 
Full review here http://www.head-fi.org/t/813550/bluedio-u-ufo-review-by-mark2410
 
Price:  £125 or between US$150 and US$100 depending on colour.
 
Specification:  Bluetooth version: Bluetooth 4.1, Supported profiles: A2DP, AVRCP, HSP, HFP, Drivers: 50mm x 2 ; 20mm x 6, Impedance: 32Ω, SPL: 120 dB, Frequency response: 5Hz -25000Hz, Wireless range: 30ft (no obstructions), Music time: about 25hours, Charging time: 3 hours for full charge.
 
Accessories:  Case, micro USB charging cable and two 3.5mm male to 3.5mm male cables for wired use, one short and one long.
 
Build Quality:  Rather nice.  Time is the real test but there is plenty of metal used in their construction and the finish on them is likewise rather nice too.  Everything is smooth, tidy and neat.
 
Isolation:  So so, not bad but you know they are an on ear so they never get perfect seals.  They are okay to use out and about and probably for on a bus use too.  Flight and Tube commutes I would tend to skip though clearly much better than nothing.  As always they block enough out that if you don’t look where you’re going your get yourself run over.
 
Comfort/Fit:  Pretty good, like all on ears they get a bit wearing after a while you know like stretching your legs after not moving for a while.  My ears like having them removed after a bit and get that feeling of relief the same as with all on ears for me.
 
Aesthetics:  Naturally no matter what colour I pick I instantly wished I’d picked my second choice, lol.  I got the red and black but they come in whopping 10 options, the Gun Silver look great, as do the Black and Silver however if you want brighter they have a Purple, Blue and even a Gold.  Yes and even the pads are coloured.  So you should be able to pick what you like best and I think they look pretty damn good.  Well some do, that Gold, err not so much.
 
Sound:  Bass, bass, bass and then some more bass.  These are very much about the bass, there is loads of it and it dominates.  Despite the fact there are 4 drivers in each side the rest of the spectrum is over shadowed.  The mids do a pretty credible job of getting through in just the sort of way you want for mainstream pop.  The highs tough they are really quite muted.  Even in treble heavy tracks the treble is very tame in comparison.  The mids too are relatively lacking in abundance but the treble especially so.  These are all about producing a prolific quantity of bass that while not super agile, it’s got power.  A massive amount of power, a slightly diffuse initial impact but the follow through is vast.  So much power, so much weight and volume.
 
Value:  They seem to have a wide price variation but even at their max price at £125 (about US$162) they are still much cheaper than their aimed at competition, Beats.  Plus you get the added bonus of their being both Bluetooth and wired capable.
 
Pro’s:  Bass. Bass.  Bass.  Great colour variety.
 
Con’s:  Bass is way over present and abundant for purists.
Pros: Great looking screen. Sounds pretty good. Powerful.
Cons: No Qi charging. That back coating makes it want to fly out of your hand.
Sony Xperia Z5 Quick Review by mark2410
 
Thanks to Vodafone UK for the loaner.
 
Full review here http://www.head-fi.org/t/813537/sony-xperia-z5-review-by-mark2410
 
Brief:  Sony’s was their flagship for a good 30 seconds.
 
Price:  £10 from £37 per month contracts or £400 on Amazon UK
 
Specification:  See here for full details.  http://www.gsmarena.com/sony_xperia_z5-7534.php
 
Accessories:  You get a simple offering, a USB charger, micro USB charging cable and that’s it.  Of course you can hit up eBay and find tons of stuff.  It’s a big name phone so there is plenty of options for cases and such.
 
Build Quality:  Great.  It does have seams but they are all so neat and tidy.  Sony know how to put together nice objects and the Z5 is no exception.  It feels well-constructed and its looks very nice as you would expect of a high-end device.  I also rather like its symmetry and balance.
 
Aesthetics:  It looks good.  The front looks nice though I’m not sure I’m wild about the backing.  It feels like it would last longer than the glass backed Z3+ but well, I just didn’t look at it and think oooooh.  It was nice for sure but nothing that made me think, oooh pretty.
 
As a Phone:  Great.  Calls were good, the screen was great, the CPU and GPU were both very zippy.  Not to mention the UI that Sony have twigged, less is more so stop adding crap to the launcher.  As such the phone felt like lightning and the UI so clean and pleasant.  No added junk there just for the sake of being different.  One thing though that I wasn’t wild over was the grip.  While this feels not so stupidly thin as the Z3+ so you’d think it’s better to grip but the back, that weird plastic paint feeling whatever it is on the back was not grippy.  More than once I felt it wanting to fly out of my hand, err it may have done so once or twice.  If it was I’d need a soft touch and grippy case on it quick smart.  Otherwise though it was all good stuff.
 
Sound:  Pretty good.  It’s not going to be worrying high end DAP’s anytime soon but lower end ones, yes.  For a phone this was quite good yet I was still disappointed.  Sony could if they let one division speak to another produce an audio output that could blow the socks of its competition.  This while not bad, pretty pleasing acoustically overall should be better.  While it may be among the best sounding phones I know Sony can do better.  Still if you must use your phone for audio, I suspect I could get by with the Z5.  Pretty much whatever I plugged in sounded rather enjoyable and while some things were better than others nothing was ever bad.  As audio performance goes, from a phone the Z5 is up there with the best stuff.  It is however a little slanted towards the lighter and brighter side, no doubt to better compliment the proclivity for earphones to be wildly bass heavy.  Just stay away from super hard and brittle things like the DBA-02.  Go warm and you’ll be pleasantly rewarded.
 
Value:  At £400 its pretty good.  You get near modern flagship spec’s, a great screen and a rather good sounding phone.  It’ll do everything you want and should have enough power to cope with things for years to come.  However Sony has a dizzying array of options with so many handsets released it impossible to say this one is better value for you that another without a close look at what matters to you.
 
Pro’s:  Great looking screen.  Sounds pretty good.  Powerful.
 
Con’s:  No Qi charging.  That back coating makes it want to fly out of your hand.
  • Like
Reactions: FYLegend
Pros: WOW, seriously wow. Looks fantastic. Wow bass. Wow treble.
Cons: Way too much wow. Shallow cups hurt my ears.
Meze 99 Classics Quick Review by mark2410
 
Thanks to Meze for the loaner.
 
Full review here http://www.head-fi.org/t/813263/meze-99-classics-review-by-mark2410
 
Brief:  All the wow and dazzle Romainia can muster.
 
Price:  US$309 or 309 euro’s.  (£232 or £259)
 
Specification:  Transducer size 40mm, Frequency response 15Hz - 25KHz, Sensitivity 103dB at 1KHz, 1mW, Impedance 32Ohm, Rated input power 30mW, Maximum input power 50mW, Cable make and material, Detachable Kevlar OFC cable, Plug 3.5mm gold plated, Weight 260 gr (9.2 ounces) without cables
 
Accessories:  Baggy for the cable and bits, a hard case for everything, a long non phone cable, a shorter phone cable, a 6.25 to 3.5mm adapter and lastly a plane adapter.
 
Build Quality:  Sumptuous.  Its looks superb, it feels superb.  This is an item of Quality.
 
Isolation:  Pretty fair, you could maybe get away with using these on a bus.  Fine for walking out and about if you were so inclined.  Not one for Tube or flights though.  Oh and as ever you’ll need to look out for wheeled chariots of death because you won’t hear traffic.
 
Comfort/Fit:  Fit was great, on and done.  Comfort though, the pads got all around my ears but the cups were shallow enough that the insides rested directly on my ears.  This rapidly got oppressive and grew to pain.  After an hour I wanted them off and hurled across the room.
 
Aesthetics:  They look stunningly good.  I didn’t love the cream but even still, damn they look great don’t they?  I can’t imagine anyone not thinking these look impressive even if they may not be to their own personal tastes.
 
Sound:  Wow.  Wow again.  They are V shaped but with a flat bottom.  The bass is elevated, very seriously elevated and loves to come rip roaring out of nowhere at you.  Its great quality though so that I don’t mind so much.  It’s punchy with a hint of bloom, a pretty spot on blend actually.  Though a little less maybe of it.  Actually if it would maybe just take a Valium and sit the F down for a bit.  It’s like someone just fed it a bag of sugar and fistfuls of blue Smartie’s.  The treble is just the same.  Too excitable, super impressive for sure, I mean it is seriously impressive but oh good lord please just sit still for a bit, please.  Now these certainly make a massively impressive first impression.  It’s simply all of the wow, so much wow, it’s off the charts impressive.  The mids, they are less wild but have a great breadth to them.  Lots of openness and a touch dry, great detail retrieval though and great clarity.
 
Still the V shaped nature of the bass and treble I find overwhelming.  If it were the bass on its own it would be fine but the treble, ahh for me that’s too much.  Its Grado esq treble with a spike in there up somewhere high that is just exhausting to my ears.
 
Value:  So long as you want its sound then it quite comfortably beats the Senn Momentum Over-Ears acoustically and detail levels.  It also looks fantastic.  Overall it’s a high quality item, more than deserving of its price.
 
Pro’s:  WOW, seriously wow.  Looks fantastic.  Wow bass.  Wow treble.
 
Con’s:  Way too much wow.  Shallow cups hurt my ears.
voxie
voxie
Hey Mark, thanks for sharing. Just wondering are they built to last re everyday commute? 
mark2410
mark2410
well time is the only true test but they are really very very nicely constructed. i would expect they would survive well especially given the cable is easily changed (they the bit that usually goes) and the whole things can be dismantled and repaired, i would expect them to live as long as you want them to. if anything i would say their somewhat noticeable looks could be the biggest problem, you look at them and you can tell they were expensive so it might be a bit of an invitation to thieves.
voxie
voxie
Thanks Mark for your reply, agree re an invitation to thieves.
Pros: Look cool. Sound great. Dirt cheap.
Cons: A little fit fussy. Slightly microphonic. Middling isolation.
Jesbod QY11 Quick Review by mark2410
 
Thanks to Jesbod UK (Jesbod US) for the sample.
 
Full review here http://www.head-fi.org/t/812145/jesbod-qy11-review-by-mark2410
 
Brief: Uhura gets some more great but dirt cheap earphones.
 
Price:  £20 or US$30
 
Specifications:  Working Time: Around 6-7 hours, Charging Voltage: DC 5V, Charging interface: MICRO USB, Charging time: Around 1-2 hours, Bluetooth Version: V4.1, Profile: APTX A2DP AVRCP HSP HFP, Communication Distance: About 10m in free field, Battery: 3.7V 90mAh Li-po battery, Size: 45 x 36 x 30mm / 1.77 x 1.42 x 1.18in, Length: 670mm / 26.38in, Weight: 18.5 g / 0.65oz
 
Accessories:  1x Charging Cable, 1x Cord Management Clip, 6x Eartips (S/M/L), 1x User Manual
 
Build Quality:  Rather nice.  Sure they are all plastic but they seem decently put together with some care.
 
Isolation:  A little so so.  They are okayish but given their form they want to sit shallow and you have no choice about it.  So while you could get away with them for out and about, maybe a bus commute that’s about it.  Tube or flights they just don’t really cut it.  You still need to keep an eye out for traffic though, least you get squished.
 
Comfort/Fit:  Pretty good I suppose.  Though I always felt the seal on the left ear wasn’t great and I wanted to push them in more but their shape precludes that.  Otherwise very comfy and very secure with that ear guide on.
 
Aesthetics:  The closer you get the more plasticky they look but from a distance, they look really good.  I like the capsule type design, they look funky.  So bold a design, something angular, I dunno they just look good.
 
Sound:  These sound just like their siblings the QY13 except these would seem to have a hint more bass.  Though that could just be to them needing to sit so shallow.  Either way their overall audio quality is really quite impressive for the price, never mind for Bluetooth at the price.  That they are also Bluetooth is a wonder of modern electronics and Chinese mass production.  That I can sit here, using these and genuinely enjoy them, actually like listening to them is crazy.  I have stuff considerably more expensive but these little babies at just £20 can hold their own and still sound pleasing is just lunacy.   Now they aren’t perfect, for starters they are rather too bassy, not massively so but you know, they are bassy.  They do slightly dominate I suppose but they never got on my nerves.  They’re well scaled and with a hint of bloom and expansion, a dash of warmth too.  Mids are good, slightly darkened, a little warmed.  They clearly have a preference for smoothly rich vocals, airy they don’t do so well but again, that price tag.  I can’t fault them for it.  The treble, it’s like the mids, warmed, not so prominent.  It is a little bit delicate too.  If you force its abundance you do start to notice that this isn’t an expensive product.  The treble tries to stay delicate and shimmery but you can tell its breaking up.
 
Still, the takeaway is, these sound impressively capable for the money.
 
Value:  Great, great sounding for the money.
 
Pro’s:  Look cool.  Sound great.  Dirt cheap.
 
Con’s:  A little fit fussy.  Slightly microphonic.  Middling isolation.
  • Like
Reactions: ejcoo
Pros: Dirt cheap. Bassy and rich sound. Easy on the ear.
Cons: A rather flavoured sound. Not the best lookers.
J&L Real J&L-100 Quick Review by mark2410
 
Thanks to J&L Real for the sample.
 
Full review here http://www.head-fi.org/t/811941/j-l-real-j-l-100-review-by-mark2410
 
Brief:  Bluetooth does bass.
 
Price:  US$28 which is about £19
 
Specifications:  Bluetooth 4.0, Chip: CSR8635, Noise reduction: CVC 6.0, Operation Range: 33 feet, Dimensions: 33.6 x 24.3 x 28.5mm/1.32 x 0.96 x 1.12 in, Battery Capacity: 70mAh Over 4 hrs Music Playback, Charge time: 1-2 hrs, Standby time: 175 hrs, Weight: 0.58 ounces/16.5 g
 
Accessories:  3 * ear tips (S, M, L), 3 * stabilizers (S, M, L), 1 * USB Cable, 1 * User Manual, 1 * Carry Pouch
 
Build Quality:  Perfectly reasonable.  They look a bit plasticky but they are plastic and they are really cheap too so it’s not unexpected.
 
Isolation:  Pretty good.  I’d be fine using these out and about, or a bus, that sort of stuff.  Not really Tube or flight worthy but better than nothing.  Naturally it’s still more than enough to get you run ever if you don’t watch where you going.
 
Comfort/Fit:  Pretty good.  They are a bit big and slightly unusually shaped however I had no issues.  I could wear them up fine too, one I removed the “stabilisers” anyway.  Those I didn’t love but they come off easy if you want.
 
Aesthetics:  They come in tree colour options, a black, red and green.  They are still mostly black with offsets but mine are the all black.  They look fine.  Nothing great but not ugly either, kinda so so.
 
Sound:  Here’s where things pickup somewhat.  While the sound quality isn’t exactly off the charts great, when you keep in mind that they contain a DAC, an amp, battery and all the wireless gubbins.  Then on top of all of that they have the actual earphones too it’s clear you have a bit of a bargain on your hands.   The bass here is what is dominant, its quality is adequate, it’s mostly about the scale and the presence it brings, its big, hearty and so full bodied.  The mids too are pretty reasonable.  They are a bit on the warmish side and slightly creamy.  Perhaps a touch thickish but this warm presentation is rather pleasant.  It also is highly complementary to most bouncy pop style vocals.  It helps to gloss over vocal issues and mastering troubles with a more smooth and consistent presentation.  The treble is somewhat light but that’s to be expected.  Its quality isn’t bad, it’s a dusting of sparkle and with its slightly warmed, gently sanded makes a for a very easy on the ear treble.  Overall its leaves a bass slanted, warm and smooth presentation.
 
Value:  While they may not be kings of audio quality, their price, well you just can’t argue with that.  For their price tag you get a very capable and good sounding Bluetooth earphone.
 
Pro’s:  Dirt cheap.  Bassy and rich sound.  Easy on the ear.
 
Con’s:  A rather flavoured sound.  Not the best lookers.
mark2410
mark2410
N.B.  the kind peeps at J&L have provided me with a discount code " PLKBUILY "  and that'll get you 20% off  
Pros: Wow. Dazzlingly spectacular presentation. Hyper dazzling treble.
Cons: See Pro’s
DUNU DN-2000J Quick Review by mark2410
 
Thanks to DUNU for the sample.
 
Full review here http://www.head-fi.org/t/811833/dunu-dn-2000j-review-by-mark2410
 
Brief:  DUNU’s new treble king.
 
Price :  £225 or US$349
 
Specifications:  Driver: Liquid crystal composite Titanium dynamic*1, Balanced armature*2, Frequency response: 4Hz-40KHz, Sensitivity: 102±2dB, Impedance: 8Ω, Plug Size: 3.5mm gold plated, Cable length: 1.2mm, Weight: 21.8g
 
Accessories:  10 sets of Eartips, 3 pairs of Comply foam eartips, 1 pair of Earhook, 3.5mm Female to 6.5mm Male Adapter, 3.5mm Female to 2-pin Male Adapter, Aluminium alloy box, 8 pairs of  adjust ring, 4 pairs of fitting rubber, 1 pair of protective rubber ring, Shirt Clip
 
Build Quality:  The exact same high stand we’ve come to expect from DUNU, first class.
 
Isolation:  For having a dynamic in them not bad, they are perfectly fine for on a bus, walking out and about sorta stuff.  Tube commutes and flight I’d give a skip unless I had nothing else.  Still as ever they are easily enough to make yourself roadkill if you fail to remember and use your eyes near traffic.
 
Comfort/Fit:  For the most part good.  I’m still not taken with the little sticky out bit that every so often would stab my ear when inserting them.  I wish they would just remove it but anyway, it wasn’t really a big issue.  In actual use they were fine and as comfy as every other normal round IEM. 
 
Aesthetics:  Not bad. I like the bare metal silvered nature but for some reason I wasn’t loving them.  I’m normally a sucker for bare metal but these I was a little indifferent to.  They look not bad, nothing special visually.
 
Sound:  These from the first instant you hear them you’ll discover a terrifying new level of detail that you may not have realised existed.  Wow are these baby’s detail cannons or what.  Side by side with their close siblings, the DN-2000, these are they but with treble steroids.  Oh lordy are these treble happy.  It’s not to say that the bass isn’t there nor that it isn’t extremely capable because it is as are the mids.  The bass is light, gently and lightly sculpted and wise you can push it, force it to roar it’s not its natural inclination.  Its bass is a paragon of neutrality and precision.  The mids too, they are very capable.  Lacking a bit of breadth, they want to narrow, focus things up and launch it out at in one narrowly focused beam.  Beam like that of a laser, so clean cutting, so perfectly focused and precise.  Full of soul and flavour?  Na not so much.  These are more about the crystal clear and cuttingly sharp presentation than silly wishy washy things like soul or comfort.  Spectacularly detailed of course but it wants to over focus and power project that clarity.  The treble too it likes to show you just how skilful it can be, it wants to show off and dazzle you, like a lead crystal decanter exploding before you.  It’s a seriously dazzlingly wow presentation.
 
Value:  DUNU have always been great value and while upper end stuff experiences diminishing returns you get what you pay for and more.
 
Pro’s:  Wow.  Dazzlingly spectacular presentation.  Hyper dazzling treble.
 
Cons:  See Pro’s
anqallyt
anqallyt
anqallyt
Its funny how the same ear bud can sound different. The ear is a finely crafted part of the body. I have zero fatigue with these and find the bass is very present and deep but the mids are laid back. It is track dependent. Some songs the vocals are harsh but most  are stellar. I will see how it is after 100 hours. My ie80's were a huge let down before 100 hour burn in. These for the price do a lot more. The comfort is top notch and these will be my portable ear buds. I got custom tips for my Westones and well let's not go there. My worry is if I take them off will I break them. I am convinced universal IEMS are tuned for in conjunction with their stems if you extend them ie... ear tips you change the sound. Another topic... DN-2000J's are top notch.great
EasyEnemy
EasyEnemy
Does anyone knows how is DN-2000j in comparison to ATH-IM03? Please kindly share with me. Thank you.
Pros: Sound bloody awesome. Fantastic acoustic balance. Source independent quality.
Cons: Lack isolation. Lacks the gargantuan bass from its predecessor some will want.
Zorloo Aero Quick Review by mark2410 (Revised Version)
 
Thanks to Zorloo for the sample.
 
Full review here http://www.head-fi.org/t/811649/zorloo-aero-review-by-mark2410-revised-version
 
Brief:  Zorloo make an even better version of what I wanted them to.
 
Price:  Post Indegogo ought to be US$119
 
Specifications:  DAC/amp ESS SABRE 9018Q2C, Max Sampling 48kHz, Max Depth 24 bit, SNR 105dB, THD 0.003%, Driver Size 14.8mm, Cable Length 1.2m
 
Accessories:  3 pairs of silicone tips, a pair of Comply’s and a little baggy case thing.  Which looks like a grey version of what I got, it’s a pretty sturdy, thick nylon baggy.
 
Build Quality:  It would appear to pretty good.  There isn’t really anything I can think of to complain about, though I still don’t love flat cables.
 
Isolation:  While their siblings isolated quite well these sadly do not.  They are very, very much more open and well vented.  That makes them far more acoustically neutral and balanced.  They also feel so much more open and airy.  So you get the acoustic trade off of being so much more vented but the downside is that I would personally have problems using them out and about or in a bus, or god forbid a library.  Still more isolation is not “better” it’s just an option and while I want a lot, not everyone will. 
 
Comfort/Fit:  Despite being big buts they were great.  Odd at first wearing something so vented but otherwise just fine for me.
 
Aesthetics:  I like them, I think I like the dark better but I’m a sucker for bare metal.  They look great.
 
Sound:  Ahh they are so open sounding.  Such space and openness, not unlike what you get from a big open can.  Still I find it a shame as otherwise these are stunning little (okay not so little) beasts.  The mids especially are fantastic.  The bass is a stupendously good quality and the treble is beautifully delicate with just enough of a pin sharp initial attack before decaying away.  Smiley face.  Otherwise, they are really, really bloody good sounding, plugging in the GR07 to my Nexus 5 and these are a clear jump up in audio quality on them.  Yeah, how crazy is that???  Now I realise a hefty chunk of that is that the Nexus 5 sounds like ass but that’s the whole point of the Aero’s.  You can plug them into stuff and bypass their crappy internal DAC and amp output.  Maybe the GR07 would win if I was comparing to a brilliant hp out but that would be negating the whole concept.  The Aero is for those who insist on using a phone and if that phone has crap audio this skirts the problem.  Sadly though not all handsets are compatible so you may need to check that before ordering a pair.  I love the balance of them.  Now I realise that some will be disappointed with the quantity of the bass but you cannot fault its quality.  Great stuff and a very audiophile like balance to these, never has my seriously crappy Nexus sounded this good, hell it’s never approached sounding like this before, awesome amazeballs stuff.
 
However they are fantastic sounding, so long as you can live without tons of isolation and have a phone that will work then these are stunning little buggers.
 
Value:  First class all the way, great value. 
 
Pro’s:  Sound bloody awesome.  Fantastic acoustic balance.  Source independent quality.
 
Con’s:  Lack isolation.  Lacks the gargantuan bass from its predecessor some will want.
Pros: Crazy mental bass. Wildly profligate bass. Big old bass canons.
Cons: See pro’s.
Phonaudio PHN200 Quick Review by mark2410
 
Thanks to Phonaudio for the sample.
 
Full review here http://www.head-fi.org/t/811449/phonaudio-phn200-review-by-mark2410
 
Brief:  Beats get out beated.
 
Price:  £209 or about US$305
 
Specifications:  Dimensions 188.07 x 169.71 x 59mm 7.4 x 6.68 x 2.32 in, Weight 160 g 5.64 oz, Cable
1.3m (Detachable), Sensitivity 108dB (+/- 5dB), Frequency Response 20Hz - 20000Hz, Frequency Response (Mic), 50Hz - 20000Hz, Sound Driver Size 40mm, Phonaudio 1.3m cable, Carrying Pouch, User Guide
 
Accessories:  Well there is the detachable cable and you should get a carrying pouch.
 
Build Quality:  Great.  They are seamlessly put together, not a hint of anything out of place or any imperfection my eye nor finger tips could detect.  They are a premium priced product and you get a premium quality product.
 
Isolation:  So so, they are on oars after all and they never give that tight a seal.  So you get what is a about typical for the type.  You know fine for out and about and probably okay for use on a bus if you don’t go nits with the volume dial.  However flights or Tube commutes I’d give them a miss.  Naturally though with music on if you fair to use your eyes near traffic you’ll end up a road stain if you don’t pay attention.  Remember to use your eyes people.
 
Comfort/Fit:  Fit was super easy, on they went and done. Comfort, like all on ears after a while for me usually in the 3 to 4 hour zone the clamping on my ears gets tiring.  It’s never sore or anything but its oppressive and taking them off feels so relieving.  All on ears are like that for me though so if you need longer listening sessions then look to the over ears version.
 
Aesthetics:   I’m a sucker from monochromatic and thus I kinda love the black on black.  Mind you that silver one looks seriously lush too.  Personally I’m a bit fan of the visual these offer.  Great looking, subtle, discrete yet when paid close attention to they clearly have had some attention to detail.
 
Sound:  Like the blond girl who thinks she’s fat says, “All About That Bass.”  If you’re looking for some cool looking on-ear headphones but you want something that sounds acoustically neutral like something from Etymotic then think again.  These are bass cannon pure and simple.  Wildly bombastic bass canons that will punch you in the gut then kick you in face.  Vast amounts of bass, with massive expansion and if you power them well with some serious punch too.  Now I don’t expect them to ever be especially well powered as they are clearly made with phone use in mind and thus they don’t need power.  They will still bounce all over the place and haul you along for the ride but if you can add some power that bass can tighten up a fair deal.  When it does it can really sock you in the jaw too, waaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhh so much power, so much bass!!!!!!!!  You’ll either love them or hate them.  These aren’t balanced or flat or delicate, open or airy.  They are heavy artillery.  Spectacular power and bassy abundance out of a seriously good looking package.
 
Value:  Not particularly cheap and while in terms of pure audio quality they can be beaten they aren’t trying to be sonically pure.  They are for top 40 pop hits, grabbing you by the lugs and taking you for a ride with them.  Weeeeeee!!!
 
Pro’s:  Crazy mental bass.  Wildly profligate bass.  Big old bass canons.
 
Con’s:  See pro’s.
Pros: Great sound quality. Stupidly cheap. Great all-rounder.
Cons: Look a bit frumpy.
Jesbod QY13 Quick Review by mark2410
 
Thanks to Jesbod UK (Jesbod US) for the sample.
 
Full review here http://www.head-fi.org/t/811367/jesbod-qy13-review-by-mark2410
 
Brief: Uhura gets some great but dirt cheap earphones.
 
Price:  £19 or US$26
 
Specifications:  Charging Voltage: DC 5V, Working Time: Around 8 hours, Charging interface: MICRO USB, Charging time: Around 1-2 hours, Bluetooth Version: V4.1, Profile: APTX A2DP AVRCP HSP HFP, Communication Distance: About 10m in free field, Battery: 3.7V 90mAh Li-po battery, Size: 17 x 19 x 21.6mm / 0.67 x 0.75 x 0.85in, Length: 640mm / 25.20in, Weight: 16.3g / 0.57oz
 
Accessories:  3 pairs of tips, 3 pairs of ear guides and a micro USB cable.
 
Build Quality:  Pretty nice.  They are seeming well put together, plastic but decent.
 
Isolation:  Not bad.  I could use these out and about or on a commuter bus at a push.  Tube or flight, not so much. Still for in the gym or out for a run I’m pretty sure they would do an admirable job.  Just remember to look where you going and lookout for traffic.
 
Comfort/Fit:  Great.  Even with the ear guide on I got along just fine.  I did swap to foam tips for expediency though.  No issues at all for me.
 
Aesthetics:  Well, they aren’t really lookers.  Not ugly or offensive to the eye but they did nothing for me visually.
 
Sound:  Very good.  They are still very bassy, more bassy than I would want but for their target market they are comparatively more balanced than others.  Not just are they better balanced their clarity and tonality are both pretty great.  All the bluetoothy bits in them too and yet they are dirt cheap still.  Not much can have gone to the drivers but whatever Jesbod have done I think they are onto a winner.  The clarity is great, detail is alright and their comparative balance makes them a plausible audiophile’s beater gym earphone.  So long as you don’t expect the moon on a stick I’d be surprised if anyone wasn’t majorly impressed with these for their diminutive price.  Sure they have lots of bass but it’s a decent quality and it’s not too domineering, reasonably clean and doesn’t interfere too much with anything else.  It does move a bit of air and lacks a bit of punch but its fairly taut for the money.  Mids too are pretty good.  I wish they were more separate but they very nicely compliment the bass and only pick up a dash of warmth from them.  Vocals are for the most part nicely clean and unmolested.  Treble is alright, not super prominent which is wise.  They offer a fairly credible level of detail too it’s just not the most present treble ever.  When you push its abundance up then it’s not bad still, it does what it can to sand off the brutal edges and retain what details it can. 
 
Great stuff for the money, not to mention for being wireless at the price too.
 
Value:  Outstanding. 
 
Pro’s:  Great sound quality.  Stupidly cheap.  Great all-rounder.
 
Con’s:  Look a bit frumpy.
  • Like
Reactions: ejcoo
Pros: Ooooh so pretty. Super lush screen. Sounds decent.
Cons: No fingerprint scanner (if you care.) No Qi charging. Slippy glass back.
Sony Xperia Z3+ Quick Review by mark2410
 
Thanks to Vodafone UK for the loaner.
 
Full review here http://www.head-fi.org/t/811184/sony-xperia-z3-review-by-mark2410
 
Brief:  Sony’s former, former sort of flagship, former.
 
Price:  £324 @ Clove atm.
 
Specifications:  See GSM Arena for the massive list of its spec’s http://www.gsmarena.com/sony_xperia_z3+-6878.php
 
Accessories:  I believe you get a macro USB cable and a USB plug charger.  (My aging loaner unit seemed to have lost its original bits.)
 
Build Quality:  Lush.  The thing feels super lovely in your hand, a bit too thin but with its glass front and back it feels really nice in the hand.  The SIM and micro SD card flap feels a little janky when its open but closed its fine.  Sony have a rep for making fine, quality things and this holds true to that mould. It looks fab and it feels like a highly polished and well-designed object.
 
Aesthetics:  Lovely.  Sony have long made some of the best looking phones around, it’s a well-deserved reputation too in my opinion.  The Z3+ may be technically older but you’d never think it to look at it.
 
As a Phone:  Great for the most part.  The only thing that really bugged me was that lovely back, that if put on any surface would slowly creep towards the edge.  That combined with its ridiculous thinness means it kinda needs to get a case on it.  That’ll spoil its looks but hey ho.  Calls and stuff were great, it was snappy and responsive, super snappy in fact.  It may be older but the thing moved like lightning feeling even quicker that I remember the G5 being.  Mind you that Snapdragon 810, ooft does that thing heap up, fast.  I wonder with the necessary case on it just how quickly that chip is going to get to throttling the CPU down.  Still for everything I ever did with it, it absolutely flew so well done to whatever Sony did to the software, tweaks and whatnot.
 
Sound:  Good, not great.  I had hoped given Sony’s level of expertise in making DAP’s they might have thrown something in here that could wipe the floor with every other phone brand.  Sadly they haven’t.  Don’t get me wrong it’s pretty good, nicely balanced and quite well detailed.  There is nothing “wrong” per say with it but…….. Sony I know you could have done so much better if you had wanted to.  I’m fairly sure they just used some Qualcomm chip as it hasn’t the traditional Sony house sound.  It’s a little warmed but mostly it’s pretty unflavoured.  Which is nice, it’s pretty versatile and its background is pretty much silent.  Its dynamics though, well they suffer.  The Z3+ hasn’t the power and authority to give grand and flowing dynamics.  No doubt if they had wanted to put a bigger capacitor it would have made the phone thicker, god forbid.  Still I feel with the auto playing when you plug something in and the music app they have its rather nice to use.  So long as you stick to nice and easy to drive things then you could probably get along quite well with it long term.
 
Value:  Pretty damn good actually, you get a blindingly snappy phone that looks beautiful and is super responsive, sounds decent too with a most excellent screen.  For a price that’s pushing about half of what a more recent flagship costs.
 
Pro’s:  Ooooh so pretty.  Super lush screen.  Sounds decent.
 
Con’s:  No fingerprint scanner (if you care.)  No Qi charging.  Slippy glass back.
Pros: Looks awesome. Super bassy. Super cheap.
Cons: Super bassy. Can’t change the tips. Fit maybe hit or miss.
Xiaomi Capsule Quick Review by mark2410
 
Thanks to GearBest for the sample.
 
Full review here http://www.head-fi.org/t/810895/xiaomi-capsule-review-by-mark2410
 
Brief:  Bent ear capsules.
 
Price:  £11 or about US$16
 
Specifications:  Connectivity : Wired, Application: Mobile phone, Portable Media Player, Plug Type: 3.5mm, Cable Length (m): 1.25m, Driver unit: 7mm, Sound channel: Two-channel (stereo), Frequency response: 20-20000Hz, Impedance: 32ohms, Sensitivity: 93dB
 
Accessories:  None.
 
Build Quality:  Fantastically good for the money.  They look and feel like a proper quality item despite their extremely low price.
 
Isolation:  When you get a good seal they isolate very well as though they may be dynamics but they are very tightly sealed.
 
Comfort/Fit:  Comfort, they were nice mostly, being all rubber they were pretty gentle on the ear.  Fit though, sadly I just could not get a good fit/seal in my left ear.  I could get a brief seal but it wouldn’t last and then the constant playing about meant there was constant pressure then suction on my ear and it became quite wearing.  Sadly they just didn’t fit me well and with their tips being non changeable there wasn’t much I could do about it.
 
Aesthetics:  I think they look bloody fantastic.  So seriously nice there is no way you’d ever guess these are anything like as cheap as they are.  They look great to me.
 
Sound:  Going by when I got them sealed they were pretty good.  They were extremely bassy as you might expect from their price, they are going for a very mainstream populist sound signature.  So gobs and gobs of bass.  Not the most solid bass perhaps but big and weighty.  The mids are fine, clear and clean enough for pop like vocals to come through with.  The treble is a bit on the subdued and subtle side but if you’re pairing with a meh source and not the best bit rates the last thing you want is abundant crisp treble.  They are tuned exactly with their price tag and the likely pairings in mind.  Pairings including the listener and what music they are listening to too.  Over all its nothing that I can fault, it’s a styling choice.  Not one for me perhaps but I’d wager my sister would love these in spades.
 
Value:  Great, a dirt cheap headset with controls that seems to work great with everything I tested, they look fantastic, they are stupidly cheap, thy roar out a massive amount of bass.  What else would someone buying a headset at this price be looking for?
 
Pro’s:  Looks awesome.  Super bassy.  Super cheap.
 
Con’s:  Super bassy.  Can’t change the tips.  Fit maybe hit or miss.
shockdoc
shockdoc
Why in the world would anyone buy an IEM that you can't change tips? 
mark2410
mark2410
well i think its aimed a much more mainstream audiance where i guess most people dont change tips anyway. 
Back
Top