Dita Dream review
**Disclaimer: I was fortunate enough to be included in the Dita Dream tour, with the stipulation that I complete a review by the time the tour was completed. There was no influence conveyed by anyone, including Dita, to give a positive or negative review.**
Dream Specs:
Dita’s website lists the following as the Dream’s specs:
What’s in the box?:
Dita’s website lists the following as the included accessories:
Build and Fit:
The first thing you notice when you remove the Dream from the box is how light the unit is. The housings, made from titanium, weigh next to nothing. When compared to Rhapsodio’s Galaxy V2 brass housing, the Dream feels like a toy. However, the finish on the housings is exquisitely done, and the craftsmanship is nothing short of perfection. The dark gunmetal color screams sophistication and professionalism, and the physical size lends to a comfortable fit for almost any ear.
If I’m allowed one opportunity to throw stones at the Dream, it would be at the housings and the coating Dita employs. It loves to reveal fingerprints and oil, and that otherwise ruins something you can consider a work of art.
Cable:
Dita’s website lists the Truth replacement cable specs as follows:
While it can be seen as the “Cable from hell,” it does do a lot of things right. One design feature I really, really liked was the 45* angled connector at the 2 pin side of the cable. For the Dream, and for IEMs with a certain type of design, it allowed the Dream to fit into my ear more comfortably than a regular straight 2 pin connector would allow. I wish other cable manufacturers would adopt this as an option, but one can only wish. The swappable jack size were designed to allow the owner the ability to go from 4.4mm balanced, to 2.5mm balanced, to 3.5mm single ended without ever having to buy another cable again. Fine for the “average” consumer, but not the last cable if you fall into the “fanatic” category.
Ergonomics aside, the Awesome cable’s strength was its sound. The Dream gives the buyer the option of the Van Den Hul Truth copper or Truth silver plated copper upon purchase. In comparing the two while doing my critical listening, the Truth copper won my affection. There was something really special about that Van Den Hul cable; perhaps it’s their “3T” technology or their method of braiding their cable. Whatever it is, that copper cable produced a sound I can only describe as spacious, holographic, detailed, and with a slight hint of warmth. I have yet to hear another pure copper cable come close to the Awesome copper cable.
Tips:
The included tips are of good quality, but I immediately installed a set of my trusty Spiral Dots and didn’t look back. I did try some Complys, but overall I preferred the SD tips.
My Setup:
My humble test rig consisted of the following: Lotoo Paw Gold-->Dita Truth Cu cable --> Dream
I only reviewed the Dream with the Paw Gold. No phone, no ipods, nothing else. You could conceivably listen to the Dream off a phone or lowered powered source, but in my experience, a DD driver loves power. In my opinion, any TOTL IEM should be used only with a quality, high powered source.
Test Music:
I used a variety of music spanning many different genres, including:
Burn In:
This is quite the polarizing subject, but I admit I’m a believer in burn in, especially when it comes to a dynamic driver. Owners of the Vega all experienced a “drop off” or lowering of the sub bass over time, and I can say the same happened with my Galaxy V2. The Dream should be no different, but I did not do any burn in as it was a test unit and I only had 7 days to conduct my critical listening. I do not know the exact amount of pre-burn in hours this tour unit had, if any, but I do recall that Barra said it was burned in by Dita prior to being shipped out for the reviews. However, as it was a tour unit, I’m sure this Dream sample had a good number of hours under its belt by the time I received it.
For more insight into the matter, please read of one Alex’s (Twister6) reviews and his thoughts on burn in.
Sound Impressions:
Bass:
The Dream, like its distant cousin the Galaxy V2, has sublime sub-bass notes. The DD equipped Dream is able to hit those low sub notes that you not only hear, but you also feel. I’m talking those “in your gut” type feelings. The bass is powerful, deep, engaging, and lays the foundation for the other notes of the musical spectrum that follow. The decay, of course, is slower than that of a BA driver unit, but the overall quality and quantity of this DD bass IEM is hard to beat. Both the quality and quantity of the sub bass and bass are outstanding, I wouldn’t change anything here.
However, with the good, sometimes comes the bad. In the Dream’s case, the sub-bass outweighs the upper mid-bass, and that lends in the Dream to portraying itself with a slightly dark presentation.
Midrange:
Vocals on the Dream are the shortfall for me. They’re slightly laid back, which is fine to some extent. Some prefer laid back vocals, some prefer neutral vocals, and some prefer forward vocals. However, as I said above, the weight and density of the sub-bass and bass with the corresponding lack of upper mid-bass produce a midrange that, to me, is on the thin side of the coin. When I say thin, I mean that the midrange is lacking warmth, size, density and thickness. Although the midrange comes across as thin, it is that inherent thinness that adds to the Dream’s presentation of the midrange. The lack of the warmth results in midrange notes that will come across as clean and articulate with a good deal of clarity, but at the expense of being what one would call “dry.” I could even go as far as stretching the definition to call the Dream “sterile.” Although it portrays the vocal notes with clarity and resolution, some male and female vocal notes will come across as emotionless and non-engaging due to the lack of warmth.
Now, don’t get me wrong. When I criticize the vocals, I mean that ideally, we would like a good balance between those components of the midrange, but individual tastes may vary. While you may may prefer a dry midrange note, at times, and depending on the singer, recordings and resulting mastery, I personally like to have body to them. I like to “feel,” through the singers voice, what he or she is trying to portray through the music. Again, it’s a purely a personal preference. Quality and quantity could use improvement in order to present a more realistic, emotional, life-like vocal note.
Treble:
Treble on the Dream does err on the brighter side of the spectrum, but I did not notice it to be overly harsh or have any hint of sibilance. Listeners with a sensitivity to elevated treble may experience fatigue, but luckily I don’t fall into that category. A slight boost in the upper midrange and lower treble of the Dream results in a higher level of detail retrieval, which I believe was a goal of designers of the Dream. That boost further results in a higher level of clarity, resolution, and articulation of the notes in this area of the spectrum. The Dream has a good level of extension for a DD driver, but it will not come close to the current offerings from the likes of 64 Audio or Empire Ears. Although the quality of treble in the Dream is good, I personally would have preferred a bit more quantity of treble in order to have more excitement in the presentation and replication of the upper notes.
Soundstage and Imaging:
Overall, the soundstage of the Dream was very good. The Dream deals a good deal of separation, air and spaciousness to the soundstage, lending the listener to easily place singers or instruments on said stage. The stage presents itself with good width and depth, and the clarity and resolution of the treble lead to a holographic effect on certain recordings (“Could this be love”).
Final Thoughts:
With the Dream, the listener is presented with an IEM that fits good, it looks good, and is capable of being worn for hours without discomfort or fatigue. It screams maturity, no doubt due to the choices made by Dita during its creation via their design cues and color choices.
Sonically, it’s very capable, detailed and resolute. For me, it excelled in its reproduction of classical, stringed, and jazz recordings, and it will reward the listener with an aptly large, spacious, and airy soundstage.
While very good, its shortcoming showed as the Dream faced difficulty portraying emotion in its vocals. When I listen to music, especially vocal tracks, I want the hair to stand up on my arm when I hear the warmth and heart in the singer’s voice. I want that quality in the vocal reproduction of my IEMs, and that’s something that the Dream simply did not do. While more than capable, it was sterile and emotionless.
And that cable. That otherwise great sounding cable. Let’s hope the Awesome cable version 2 (or whatever they name it) sounds as good or better, without those demon-child qualities. From what I’ve read on the Dita thread, the new version 2 cable addresses the numerous complaints regarding the ergonomics of the old cable.
Overall, the Dream with appeal to many, but will remain with a select few who desire this type of tuning. Sadly, for me, this Dream is not the dream I dream of.
**Disclaimer: I was fortunate enough to be included in the Dita Dream tour, with the stipulation that I complete a review by the time the tour was completed. There was no influence conveyed by anyone, including Dita, to give a positive or negative review.**
Dream Specs:
Dita’s website lists the following as the Dream’s specs:
- Driver 1 Newly-Developed Ultra-wide Bandwidth 10mm Transducer
- FR 10-25000 Hz
- Impedance 16 ohms
- Sensitivity 102 db
- Colour Titanium Black
- Cable The Truth Custom Made By VDH 1.2M
- Solder VDH Lead-Free Silver Solder
- Connector Awesome 2.5mm TRRS / 3.5mm TRS
What’s in the box?:
Dita’s website lists the following as the included accessories:
- 3 Pairs Small Bore Tips S/M/L (sweeter highs)
- 3 Pairs Medium Bore Tips S/M/L (reference tuning)
- 3 Pairs Large Bore Tips S/M/L (airier highs)
- 1 Custom Flight Adapter
- 1 Premium Leather Pouch
Build and Fit:
The first thing you notice when you remove the Dream from the box is how light the unit is. The housings, made from titanium, weigh next to nothing. When compared to Rhapsodio’s Galaxy V2 brass housing, the Dream feels like a toy. However, the finish on the housings is exquisitely done, and the craftsmanship is nothing short of perfection. The dark gunmetal color screams sophistication and professionalism, and the physical size lends to a comfortable fit for almost any ear.
If I’m allowed one opportunity to throw stones at the Dream, it would be at the housings and the coating Dita employs. It loves to reveal fingerprints and oil, and that otherwise ruins something you can consider a work of art.
Cable:
Dita’s website lists the Truth replacement cable specs as follows:
- Van Den Hul patented 3T technology carbon based cable technology (Also available in copper/Cu)
- Available in MMCX and 2 pin configuration
- The Truth cable with its recognizable cable viewer which highlights the intricate twist and braid used.
- The Awesome plug allows for a multitude of configurations on the plug end for use on various types of players.
- Available in 3.5 mm TRS and 2.5 mm TRRS (4.4mm TRRS should be available now)
While it can be seen as the “Cable from hell,” it does do a lot of things right. One design feature I really, really liked was the 45* angled connector at the 2 pin side of the cable. For the Dream, and for IEMs with a certain type of design, it allowed the Dream to fit into my ear more comfortably than a regular straight 2 pin connector would allow. I wish other cable manufacturers would adopt this as an option, but one can only wish. The swappable jack size were designed to allow the owner the ability to go from 4.4mm balanced, to 2.5mm balanced, to 3.5mm single ended without ever having to buy another cable again. Fine for the “average” consumer, but not the last cable if you fall into the “fanatic” category.
Ergonomics aside, the Awesome cable’s strength was its sound. The Dream gives the buyer the option of the Van Den Hul Truth copper or Truth silver plated copper upon purchase. In comparing the two while doing my critical listening, the Truth copper won my affection. There was something really special about that Van Den Hul cable; perhaps it’s their “3T” technology or their method of braiding their cable. Whatever it is, that copper cable produced a sound I can only describe as spacious, holographic, detailed, and with a slight hint of warmth. I have yet to hear another pure copper cable come close to the Awesome copper cable.
Tips:
The included tips are of good quality, but I immediately installed a set of my trusty Spiral Dots and didn’t look back. I did try some Complys, but overall I preferred the SD tips.
My Setup:
My humble test rig consisted of the following: Lotoo Paw Gold-->Dita Truth Cu cable --> Dream
I only reviewed the Dream with the Paw Gold. No phone, no ipods, nothing else. You could conceivably listen to the Dream off a phone or lowered powered source, but in my experience, a DD driver loves power. In my opinion, any TOTL IEM should be used only with a quality, high powered source.
Test Music:
I used a variety of music spanning many different genres, including:
- Arne Domnerus Group : Jazz At The Pawnshop
- Bob Marley: Is this Love
- Daft Punk: R.A.M. - Fragments
- Eric Clapton: Change the World, Layla (Unplugged)
- Nora Jones: Come away with me
- Led Zeppelin IV: Stairway to Heaven
- Lorde: Royals
- Nirvana, Unplugged: All Apologies
- Pink Floyd, DSOTM : Time, Money
- Sade: Best of
- Steely Dan: Aja
- Sting: Thousand Years, Brand New Day
- Ultrasone: Test CD (It's quite superb)
Burn In:
This is quite the polarizing subject, but I admit I’m a believer in burn in, especially when it comes to a dynamic driver. Owners of the Vega all experienced a “drop off” or lowering of the sub bass over time, and I can say the same happened with my Galaxy V2. The Dream should be no different, but I did not do any burn in as it was a test unit and I only had 7 days to conduct my critical listening. I do not know the exact amount of pre-burn in hours this tour unit had, if any, but I do recall that Barra said it was burned in by Dita prior to being shipped out for the reviews. However, as it was a tour unit, I’m sure this Dream sample had a good number of hours under its belt by the time I received it.
For more insight into the matter, please read of one Alex’s (Twister6) reviews and his thoughts on burn in.
Sound Impressions:
Bass:
The Dream, like its distant cousin the Galaxy V2, has sublime sub-bass notes. The DD equipped Dream is able to hit those low sub notes that you not only hear, but you also feel. I’m talking those “in your gut” type feelings. The bass is powerful, deep, engaging, and lays the foundation for the other notes of the musical spectrum that follow. The decay, of course, is slower than that of a BA driver unit, but the overall quality and quantity of this DD bass IEM is hard to beat. Both the quality and quantity of the sub bass and bass are outstanding, I wouldn’t change anything here.
However, with the good, sometimes comes the bad. In the Dream’s case, the sub-bass outweighs the upper mid-bass, and that lends in the Dream to portraying itself with a slightly dark presentation.
Midrange:
Vocals on the Dream are the shortfall for me. They’re slightly laid back, which is fine to some extent. Some prefer laid back vocals, some prefer neutral vocals, and some prefer forward vocals. However, as I said above, the weight and density of the sub-bass and bass with the corresponding lack of upper mid-bass produce a midrange that, to me, is on the thin side of the coin. When I say thin, I mean that the midrange is lacking warmth, size, density and thickness. Although the midrange comes across as thin, it is that inherent thinness that adds to the Dream’s presentation of the midrange. The lack of the warmth results in midrange notes that will come across as clean and articulate with a good deal of clarity, but at the expense of being what one would call “dry.” I could even go as far as stretching the definition to call the Dream “sterile.” Although it portrays the vocal notes with clarity and resolution, some male and female vocal notes will come across as emotionless and non-engaging due to the lack of warmth.
Now, don’t get me wrong. When I criticize the vocals, I mean that ideally, we would like a good balance between those components of the midrange, but individual tastes may vary. While you may may prefer a dry midrange note, at times, and depending on the singer, recordings and resulting mastery, I personally like to have body to them. I like to “feel,” through the singers voice, what he or she is trying to portray through the music. Again, it’s a purely a personal preference. Quality and quantity could use improvement in order to present a more realistic, emotional, life-like vocal note.
Treble:
Treble on the Dream does err on the brighter side of the spectrum, but I did not notice it to be overly harsh or have any hint of sibilance. Listeners with a sensitivity to elevated treble may experience fatigue, but luckily I don’t fall into that category. A slight boost in the upper midrange and lower treble of the Dream results in a higher level of detail retrieval, which I believe was a goal of designers of the Dream. That boost further results in a higher level of clarity, resolution, and articulation of the notes in this area of the spectrum. The Dream has a good level of extension for a DD driver, but it will not come close to the current offerings from the likes of 64 Audio or Empire Ears. Although the quality of treble in the Dream is good, I personally would have preferred a bit more quantity of treble in order to have more excitement in the presentation and replication of the upper notes.
Soundstage and Imaging:
Overall, the soundstage of the Dream was very good. The Dream deals a good deal of separation, air and spaciousness to the soundstage, lending the listener to easily place singers or instruments on said stage. The stage presents itself with good width and depth, and the clarity and resolution of the treble lead to a holographic effect on certain recordings (“Could this be love”).
Final Thoughts:
With the Dream, the listener is presented with an IEM that fits good, it looks good, and is capable of being worn for hours without discomfort or fatigue. It screams maturity, no doubt due to the choices made by Dita during its creation via their design cues and color choices.
Sonically, it’s very capable, detailed and resolute. For me, it excelled in its reproduction of classical, stringed, and jazz recordings, and it will reward the listener with an aptly large, spacious, and airy soundstage.
While very good, its shortcoming showed as the Dream faced difficulty portraying emotion in its vocals. When I listen to music, especially vocal tracks, I want the hair to stand up on my arm when I hear the warmth and heart in the singer’s voice. I want that quality in the vocal reproduction of my IEMs, and that’s something that the Dream simply did not do. While more than capable, it was sterile and emotionless.
And that cable. That otherwise great sounding cable. Let’s hope the Awesome cable version 2 (or whatever they name it) sounds as good or better, without those demon-child qualities. From what I’ve read on the Dita thread, the new version 2 cable addresses the numerous complaints regarding the ergonomics of the old cable.
Overall, the Dream with appeal to many, but will remain with a select few who desire this type of tuning. Sadly, for me, this Dream is not the dream I dream of.