STAX SR-X9000

General Information

"SR-X9000 is the new flagship Earspeaker that marks the pinnacle of Stax electrostatic headphones production. A major technology advancement is the “MILER-3” (Multi-Layer-Elect-Rords) - a four-layer fixed electrode combining mesh electrodes and conventional etching electrodes that are crimped by thermal diffusion bonding. The newly developed manufacturing technique matures through a 20-year accumulated research and development, allowing a rigid structure that is resistant to resonation while smoothly evolving the transmission characteristics of sound compared to conventional multilayer fixed electrodes."

DSC02933.jpg

SR-X9000 Specifications:

● Type: push-pull electrostatic sound element, open-air type enclosure
● Sound element shape: large round shape
● Fixed electrode: MLER-3 (Multi Layer Electrodes)
● Frequency response: 5 - 42,000Hz
● Electrostatic capacitance: 110pF
● Impedance: 145kΩ
● Sound pressure sensitivity: 100dB
● Bias voltage: 580V DC
● Attached cable conductor: 6N(99.9999%)OFC + silver plated annealed copper wire ●Cable: parallel 6-strand, low-capacity wide cable
● Cable length:2.5m,1.5m
● Ear pad: genuine sheep leather (skin touching portion), artificial leather (surrounding portion)
● Weight: 432g (ear speaker)

Latest reviews

ufospls2

Headphoneus Supremus
Stax SR-X9000 - Full Review
Pros: Technical Performance
Build Quality
Comfort
Cons: 3khz peak
img_2255.jpg

Hi Guys,

Today we are talking about Stax Headphones new flagship model, the SR-X9000. For the rest of this review, I’ll just refer to it as the X9000.

The X9000 is the very long anticipated replacement for the SR009 and SR009S, the previous flagships from Stax. With such a long history and such a dedicated cult following, a new flagship from Stax is a big deal, at least in terms of the headphone hobby. I remember people speculating what would be next ,even back in 2014/2015, and now today, in 2022 we have the X9000. The X9000 was released back in September of 2021, but I think Stax has been a bit overwhelmed with orders, and is struggling to fulfill the demand from the community. Wait times as of right now are very long, and there are still people who ordered back in October/November 2021 (currently July 2022) waiting for their headphones to arrive. With that being said, there does seem to have been a few more shipments arriving lately, so if you are reading this and still waiting for your pair, I hope you will have them soon.

The X9000 builds upon the “omega” legacy, which started with the original SR-Omega, back in 1993. Then there was the SR007, the SR007mk2, the SR009, and the SR009S. I have not heard the original Omega from 1993, which does have a cult following of its own, but I have heard all the others. The X9000, to me, is not really an upgrade of any one particular Stax Flagship, nor is it a mix of SR007 and SR009. It is sort of doing its own thing. I have done a lot of comparative listening, and the X9000 is absolutely my favourite Stax headphone I have heard thus far, minus one caveat I will mention a bit later.

img_2257.jpg

The bass of the X9000 has been surprising. Not so much in its overall level, though it does have more bass than the SR009. It has a bit less in terms of quantity than the SR007, with the Sr007 sounding fuller and warmer, with a bit more mid bass. The X9000 has the best quality of bass I have heard from Stax. It’s very fast, with more impact than is usually associated with something like the SR009. Admittedly, it does not have the impact or slam that the Abyss 1266TC has, but not much does to be honest. In terms of level, I could certainly enjoy the X9000 in its stock tuning, but did find a +3db low shelve brought it more in line with my personal preferences. I never found myself wanting more from the low end performance of the X9000, and its sub bass was also quite impressive for an electrostatic design.

With regards to the X9000’s midrange, Stax seems to have err’d on the side of slight warmth, and a forgiving nature in the low mids, much less so than the SR007, but more so than the SR009. Now, this brings me to the caveat I mentioned earlier. In the first couple days of listening with the X9000, there was something that just wasn’t sitting right with my ears, and was annoying me at anything above a medium listening level. It was the peak at 3khz. I just couldn’t get on with it, and ended up lowering it by 3.5db via EQ, and the X9000 went from being frustrating to listen to (because I could tell it was a very accomplished headphone) to being one of the best I have heard, period. Now, to make a quick comparison, the Audeze CRBN has an even bigger peak at 3khz, and I found I was not able to rectify them with EQ to be in line with my preferences. There are a lot of people out there who enjoy the stock tuning of Audeze’s CRBN, so you may hear the X9000 and be totally ok with its peak at 3khz. Perhaps I am just sensitive to this area, and you may not be.

img_2267.jpg

The treble of the X9000 is not dark, nor is it bright. It seems to me to be leaning towards a relaxed presentation, neutral-ish, but leaning towards dark rather than bright. Given peoples issues with the somewhat bright treble of the SR009, this tuning decision makes sense. I wouldn’t say the X9000 itself is actually a very laid back headphone, its still relatively forward sounding, and it doesn’t strike me that it is masking detail by being overly dark. The treble and leading edges or notes are fairly incisive sounding and I never founding myself wincing at cymbals hits or shrill vocals when listening at spirited volumes.

Now, for me personally, what made the X9000 really standout was its technical performance. I have seen some impressions that felt it didn’t really improve over the SR009 in this area, and I have to be honest, I feel completely the opposite. I have listened extensively back to back with the SR009, and the X9000 really has taken a big step forward. Pretty much every single metric has been improved over the previous flagship. The sonic image is much bigger, and the soundstage is wider. The overall detail levels are again improved in comparison to the SR009. Imaging is also improved over the SR009, which is surprising as I always felt that was one of the SR009’s strong points. I have a suspicion the ear pad design of the X9000 may be contributing to the overall larger sonic picture, as well as the larger driver. Stax really does seem to have managed to improve the drivers performance compared to their previous flagship models, so in that sense, the ten year wait between the SR009 and X9000 was worth it.

In terms of build quality, the materials used, and overall feel, the X9000 is on par with the best I have come across. It is a lightweight and extremely comfortable headphone, and also feels more premium than the other Stax headphones. The leather of the ear pads feels very nice and “high quality.” This is one area I felt Stax could improve upon previously, and I have to admit that for the MSRP, the X9000 certainly feel as if they are made to that standard. In comparison, something like the Hifiman Shangri-La lacks in this area, but the X9000 has really delivered on its promises of being a high end flagship in terms of build quality. The X9000 also comes in a nicely done pawlonia wood box, and the overall package feels well put together, and again, of a “premium” nature.

img_2267-1.jpg

One comparison that makes a lot of sense is to compare the X9000 to the Hifiman Shangri-La Sr. Both are flagship electrostatic models, though as I mentioned previously the build of the X9000 is certainly superior between the two. However, sonically speaking, its a much closer battle. The X9000 has a similar “large” sonic image to the Shangri-La, with the Shangri-La having a taller soundstage,but the width between the two being similar. The overall detail levels are very similar but I would give the edge to the Shangri-La by about 5’ish %. The Shangri-la is a slightly brighter, and also more forward sounding overall, with a sharper leading edge to notes. There is a sense of delicacy and air that the Shangri-La has that the X9000 doesn’t. With that being said, the X9000’s tonal balance works very well for some music, more so than the Shangri-La. If you are concerned with budget, the X9000 is the obvious choice ($6200MSRP vs $18,0000MSRP) because it comes incredibly close to the SR in over technical performance whilst also performing better with some forms of music.

In comparison to the Abyss 1266TC, these are actually two very complimentary headphones. The Abyss has this raw energy, slam, visceral quality that I have still yet to hear a headphone match. It is also a very detailed headphone with a highly capable technical performance, though I do think the X9000 may slightly beat it on the detail front, but the difference is incredibly small. I could honestly see someone deciding upon these two headphones as a pair of complementary flagships to own.

img_2271.jpg

Overall? The Stax SR-X9000 has taken a long time to arrive, but I do believe it’s been worth the wait. It’s the most complete and competent Stax headphone I have personally heard (keeping in mind I have not heard the original omega.) Stax seems to have listened to customers complaints about their previous headphones and done their best to address them. The somewhat lean and bright sounding SR009 has been fixed, and the somewhat overly warm and lacklustre build quality of the SR007 has also been addressed. That’s not to say the SR-X9000 is without fault, as I do find it has too much energy in the 3khz range, which is thankfully easily fixed by a tiny tweak with EQ. Once that has been done, the SR-X9000 has comfortably made it into my top 3 personal favourite headphones. The Abyss 1266TC, The Hifiman Shangri-La SR, and the SR-X9000. I look forward to seeing what Stax comes up with for the next flagship, see you in a decade or so
🙂

AudioKeyK

Member of the Trade: AudioKey Reviews
Electrostatic Musical Nirvana (Full Stop)!
Pros: Outstanding transparency, resolution, and detail retrieval. Sublime tone/timbre, musicality, and refinement. Able to seamlessly blend its genre-leading (all headphones) transparency and resolving abilities with a musicality that is, truly, breathtaking and second to none.
Cons: It's expensive.
DSCF9595_1024x1024%402xm.jpg


I entered the world of electrostatic headphones and headphone amplifiers a little over a year ago and was surprised to discover that that which I thought an impossibility—incredible “you-are-there” transparency, deep detail retrieval, and captivating musicality—was a truth. This revelation came with the award-winning electrostatic headphone amplifier and electrostatic headphones—the Linear Tube Audio (LTA) Z10e and the STAX SR-L700MkII, respectively. The reviews clearly paint the picture of their performance and my experience with both components.

Since that time I have reviewed a number of electrostatic headphones and headphone amplifiers, which derive from a technology established over 80 years ago that, in my opinion, has not been surpassed to date. As I wrote of my observations after reviewing several electrostatic headphones:
“I can now attest to having had the pleasure of several electrostatic headphones—STAX SR-009S, STAX SR-007MkII, STAX SR-L700MkII, and the Dan Clark VOCE, —in house, at the same time, to take me on my very first electrostatic listening journey. One electrostatic earspeaker [headphone] would, no doubt, have given me a point of reference on a map of electrostatic sound; the combination, however, has laid out a state of sound replete with terrain and points of interest and a rather sublime beauty! It has been an incredible experience.”
Electrostatic headphones not only provide a “you-are-there” experience, but they draw you in as you listen to music which you believed you knew, but did not. You see, so much information is actually missing or, more accurately, buried beneath a ‘floor of noise’ that, in general, headphones and headphone amplifiers simply cannot penetrate. Certainly there are some headphones that can do a relatively good job in their attempts to pierce the noise floor. Electrostatics, on the other hand, pass through noise floors as if they are made of air. And once beyond them electrostatics bring resolution and clarity to that which may have been ‘fuzzy,’ ‘out of focus,’ or ‘hidden.’ Further, they ‘unearth’ volumes of detail that give insight to certain vocal inflections connected to emotion, as well as ambient cues which help to map the inner volume of a given venue—cathedral, night club, hall, etc.—for better three-dimensionality and air and space.

DSCF9635_1024x1024%402x.jpeg


Other commonalities among the electrostatic headphones are their tachyon like transient speed which further increases the feeling and sensations of a “you-are-there” experience. For instance, lightning fast drummers deserve lightning fast transient responses, as well as blistering dynamic swings—soft and easy to loud and busting! Electrostatic headphones are better equipped to do this than other types of headphones because their construction allows them to shed weight—magnets, voice coils, heavy driver assemblies, etc. An apt metaphor would see electrostatics as Peregrine Falcons (200mph dives) to other types of headphones as Cheetahs (61 mph). Yes, a few too many Wild Kingdom shows.

So given this fact, electrostatics, in general, thrive on transient quick recorded live music, and spacious venues with lots going on, across numerous genres—choral, classical, jazz, rock, folk, soul, EDM, etc. If you live in or often visit these genres, well, jackpot with an electrostatic headphone! And, again, all that it will take to understand this very clearly, is a listen to the music that you believed you knew with an electrostatic headphone. Done.

However, after reentering the worlds of dynamic and planar headphones via two recent reviews—Meze Empyrean Elite and the ZMF Atticus—each of which showed some consistency or momentary flashes of electrostatic reproduction, respectively, it was clear that the gap may well be closing between the worlds, after 80 years.

The company currently at the forefront of electrostatic headphone and headphone amplification technology is STAX. STAX, which began operations in 1938, has held forth for over 80 years, creating, improving, and introducing its various electrostatic products, which continually find high praise across the wide world. Its fans remain loyal, while its products, having withstood the test of time, are often considered heirlooms and passed across generations.

DSCF9562_1024x1024%402x.jpeg


I have referred to the abilities of electrostatics, when paired with exceptional upstream components—DACs, streamers, CD players, etc.—as time machines. Time machines not unlike Dr. Who’s tardis that travels across time and space, delivering the Doctor and his companion(s) to this venue then that. In this respect, electrostatics can often render a compelling semblance of being in the actual recording venue. Well, the subject of this review—STAX SR-X9000—amazingly, takes things even further.

REFRAIN: Unlike most reviews, this review will be non-sequential, as it will start with how the headphones actually sound and not the process of physically “undressing” them and/or laying out their various parts, specifications, etc. Think of this review then, as a non-linear movie— In the Shadow of the Moon, Kill Bill, Pulp Fiction, The Queen’s Gambit, etc—that, likewise, starts at the end and winds its way to the beginning.

The Sound​

Let me start by saying that the STAX SR-X9000 is, without a doubt, the synthesis of over 80 years of experience and insight gained from success and failure, perpetual research and refinement of brand, and the distillation of this wealth of knowledge into this one singular headphone.

How then does STAX’s latest flagship compare to its previous flagship the SR-009S? The STAX SR-X9000 sits on a quantum shelf above all of its related and near-related brethren—headphones. It is both extraordinary and compelling. You’ll not want to take these headphones off, I certainly didn’t. If there is no STAX SR-X9000 in my daily listening mix, then I am asleep a few hours earlier, each night. The SR-X9000 is highly immersive, in that it will engage you via your very own music, perhaps like no system, no components, regardless of price, has ever been able to do before. Hyperbole? One listen should do the trick.

The SR-X9000 is spacious in the sense that ‘spacious’ would be just the beginning of the description with holographic its ending or punctuation mark. Perhaps it is the larger surface area of its drivers/diaphragms and their configuration (in a nonparallel enclosure) that allows for more spatial/ambient cues, more resulting air, more nuance, and a bass response, which easily sets it apart from its brethren. It is a bass response that travels regularly to the stygian depths of the Holy-Bass-Head-Grail and does so without obscuring up-frequency information/detail at all. This, taken together, was $#@*&%! incredible. And I don’t curse in reviews.

The SR-X9000 is outstandingly transparent and resolving, in a way that will truly show recordings naked in their composition with detail laying about for the having. And yet, despite its prodigious ability to retrieve this detail, the music rendered is always natural, organic, imminently musical, and immersive. Its former multi-award-winning sibling—STAX SR-009S—simply could not keep up. Amazing!

And timbre, texture, tone? Well, they too are exceptional. Instrumental timbres and tones are superbly parsed within a generous and dense mix of instruments, orchestras, large bands, etc. And tone is addictive, compelling, liquid and seemingly edible.

The STAX SR-X9000 sports a soundstage that in true STAX fashion encompasses, swallows, envelops, if you will, its predecessor’s! Its landscape of sound is beautifully layered, imaging/positioning exceptional, and there is a spaciousness and air that gives domain—separation—to performers, and volume to venues.

The STAX SR-X9000 was paired with the STAX SRM-T8000 flagship headphone amplifier (award winner), the LTA Z10e integrated/headphone amplifier (award winner), the Mola Mola Tambaqui DAC (award winner), the DENAFRIPS Pontus II DAC (award winner), and the Roon Nucleus Plus (award winner). An Audience Front Row Cable suite (review coming) was tasked with all wire/cable responsibilities, while a TORUS RM20 provided the power conditioning/regeneration. Again, great bandmates, and you’re traveling across time and space. Eames-Chair-Tardis anyone?

Bass​

Foundational. Taut. Lightning-fast.Transparent. Palpable. Eiji Oue’s V. Infernal Dance of King Kashchey (Stravinsky, Reference Recording) thunders in as massed tympani strike a propulsive and foreboding blow, and another, and then several more. The force and weight displayed here its kin electrostatic could not match. And as the orchestra engages, what is immediately noted is that the Minnesota Orchestral Hall has grown in volume, or so it appears via the STAX SR-X9000. In the STAX SR-009S review, the prior flagship of the STAX lineup, I wrote that the SR-009S is as “transparent as a summer’s day is long—unrivaled transparency,” and that the SR-009S “is without analog—peer.” Scratch both statements. The STAX SR-009S now stands both rivaled and surpassed, by its younger sibling—SR-X9000. Change is, indeed, constant. In this movement from Stravinsky’s Firebird, instruments are given their own individual spatial domains among an orchestra of competing instruments, and this in itself bears the quite distinct hallmark of exceptional positioning, layering, and separation. And as the crescendo approaches, there is a deep, foreboding rumble and then an explosion(!) via the concurrent strikes landed upon massed tympani! An electrostatic headphone that does sub-bass with no apologies or excuses or dithering! The STAX SR-X9000 just does it. Wow! And yet, in the quietest of passages it creates an extravagant tranquility, much like its older sibling, but it is even more immersive, nuanced, refined. Now for something that is completely different. David Holland’s “B-40/M23-6K/RS-W” (Emerald Tears, ECM), bass-notes all taut and fast, transparent and resolving, and combined with an astute rendering of tone, this track is revealed as something new. New, despite countless hearings! Did I mention the SR-X9000’s transient speed and how it leaves its multi-award-winning sibling—SR-009S—behind and how immersive it is? Yeah, I guess I did. Well, brilliant! I was only going to do two tracks, but then Marcus Miller’s Power (M2, Concord) slammed in and, I believe, “$%#@#*-*&%$##!,” was my response. No more nuance here just raw, throbbing, chair-dancing, Holy-Bass-Head-Grail grabbing, and I could have sworn that the SR-X9000 gave a sly, sideways smile and a wink. “I can do bass, thank you.”

Midrange​

Olafur Arnalds’ “Árbakkinn” (Island Songs, Mercury (Universal France)) opens and there is no artifice, no noise, no distraction, only silence and stillness. From this stillness rises intimacy and emotion and a palpability that conspire to transcend recorded music and transport one to the venue. The SR-X9000 has provided the most touching, most breathtaking rendition that I have yet heard. Reference System 1’s components (see below)—Headphone Amp and DAC and wires, etc. are the same as in the SR-009S’ review. The only variable in this hearing is the STAX SR-X9000. Einar Georg Einarsson’s recital, his in-drawn breath are honest, real, natural, as are the tones of the piano, violins, viola, and cello. And their various timbres are easily parsed, easily resolved, aided by a transparency which even most electrostatics do not possess. “This is something new,” I write in my notes, “and it is not at all subtle.” The birds? Only the best system configurations can do all of the above and then place the birds, who linger just outside of the recording space, in a duo with Einar, from the very first seconds (00:02) of the recording. They sing from beginning to end as accompaniment to Einar’s recital. Suffice to say, that the rendering of “Árbakkinn” by the SR-X9000 and the accompanying reference system is phenomenal, entirely without precedent, and the most immersive experience I have had in the electrostatic world (or any other). I was to write also about the SR-X9000 renderings of Voces8’s “Agnus Dei” (Lux, Decca) and Shirley Horn’s “Beautiful Love” (You Won’t Forget Me, Verve), both of which rose above all prior renderings in the selfsame way as had “Árbakkinn.” Time and space and word limits, however, fought this. Though I am left with the words: Immersive. Transcendent. Palpable.

Treble+​

Pristine. Resolution. Boundless. Air. Lightning Fast. These are but a few of the words that remained fixed in my mind after the treble sessions with STAX SR-X9000. While I generally write up a recording or two and on rare occasions three in the review, though behind the scenes numerous treble heavy tracks are used for evaluation. Short of the movie the Natural, however, I have never seen a player/component hit, within a single game, homerun after homerun after homerun, all day long. First up. Dave Brubeck’sTake Five” (Time Out, Columbia-Legacy) and it’s out of the park! Joe Morello’s Hi-Hats and Ride cymbals, stage left, rise, drop, rise, drop, resonate with distinct timbral accuracy and a resolution and decay so natural, so real, that right now through the SR-X9000 it’s shaming six figure stereo systems, that should be embarrassed to call what they’re doing resolving! Painting a fence with a few spray cans—Schccchccssssssh (the mess!)—perhaps, but not playing music. As per our motto, I shall name no names. Yet this STAX SR-X9000 headphone-based system with its compatriots, relative to the systems I’ve heard, is but a fraction of a fraction of their cost. “Say what?!” Yep, and that’s the truth. Miles Davis’s “Freddie Freeloader” (Kind of Blue, Blue Note) outta the park! Trio Karénine “Verklärte Nacht, Op. 4:11 Breiter” (La Nuit Transfigurée, Mirare) outta the park! Emmanuelle Bertrand’s “Tout un Monde: Énigme” (Dutilleux & Debussy: Works w/Cello, Harmonia Mundi) outta the park! Hilary Hahn’s “Sonata No. 1 in G minor: Adagio” (Hilary Hahn Plays Bach: Violin Sonatas Nos 1 & 2; Partita No. 1, Decca) outta the park!

20210922_105943.jpg


20210922_110340.jpg
20210922_110401.jpg
20210922_110531.jpg


20210922_110548.jpg
20210922_110512.jpg


The Wrappings and Accessories​

The STAX SR-X9000 comes in a medium-large printed, matte, mocha-brown box. The box is minimalist, clean, with logo type and product designation and company branding claiming various sides of the box.
The inside container is a beautifully stained, wooden box. The top lifted, one finds the STAX SR-X9000, held between two thick, protective, identical foam inserts. The wooden box is not, however, a travel case. It is instead a show case made from a wood that is said to have a long history in Japan for storing one’s valuables, and for defeating humidity—paulownia wood.
The overall design is clean, the inner wooden box is an elegant, sumptuous touch, though I still long for the hardened, plastic-aluminum travel case of the SR-007A. Life, unfortunately, is filled with those who would care far less for your prized headphones and its nice wooden box than you.


Design—Look, Feel, and Technology​


DSCF9531_1024x1024@2x.jpeg


DSCF9635_1024x1024@2x.jpeg


DSCF9562_1024x1024@2x.jpeg


DSCF9547_1024x1024@2x (1).jpeg

DSCF9631_1024x1024@2x (1).jpeg



Round. Aluminum. Leather. Stainless Steel. The sum of which come together in a design that is more elegant and sophisticated and rich than the earlier flagship holder. The colors, the patina of the metals, the leather, the headband are a rich deep mocha that is just gorgeous, yet in an understated way. “What?” You say? There’s no bling! Save for the gold colored metal mesh that protects the diaphragms. But even this is done with such…panache.

STAX SR-X9000 is an open back electrostatic earspeaker that, like each of its siblings, loses the magnets associated with planar magnetic headphones and dynamic driver headphones (and loses the coils of dynamic drivers as well). Electricity is delivered across the entirety of the electrodes/stators—thin mylar film diaphragm, sandwiched between two conductive metal plates—and is available on demand. However the diaphragm has changed in this latest iteration. As STAX explains, the SR-X9000 utilizes a four-layer diaphragm—the MLER-3 to which:

“An etching electrode and a metal-mesh electrode are bonded using the diffused junction (thermo-compression bonding). After 2 generations of STAX flagship models, STAX’s manufacturing technology makes a significant contribution to the stable mass production of big round-shaped metal-mesh electrodes. For MLER-3, sound transparency evolved more smoothly than conventional multi-layer fixed electrodes. And the rigidity characteristic resistant to vibration also evolved.”

If the SR-009S sported light-speed transients, as electrostatics are wont to do, the SR-X9000 may well be sporting tachyon-speed—faster than light—transients.
The STAX SR-X9000’s cable is composed of a six-strand, six-nines-copper (6NCu), low capacitance cable for the core wires and six silver-plated copper wires that make up the perimeter. Like all STAX cables the STAX SR-X9000’s cable:
“Uses the conventional wide format parallel structure to lower the capacitance between each wire and finishes with the most suitable structure to drive the earspeaker.”

The various wires are housed within a plastic/rubber sheath. The cable is terminated in a five-prong assembly that allows connection to only electrostatic “energizers” or amplifiers, as electrostatic earspeakers cannot be driven by traditional amplification.

In sum, the STAX SR-X9000 is gorgeous and rather delicious looking, actually. Mocha, remember? Do you like chocolate as much as I do? Hmmmm, not possible. And its comfort is ‘day-long’, as was the case for me during its review when it was worn consistently day after day without effect or ‘headphone head.’

The Specifications​

STAX SR-X9000
  • Type: push-pull electrostatic, oval sound element, rear open-air type enclosure
  • Frequency response: 7 – 41,000Hz
  • Electrostatic capacitance: 110pF (including attached cable)
  • Impedance: 145kΩ (including attached cable, at 10kHz)
  • Sound pressure sensitivity: 101dB / input 100Vr.m.s. / 1kHz
  • Maximum sound pressure level: 118dB / 400Hz
  • Bias voltage: 580V DC
  • Ear pad: real sheep’s leather (skin-touching portion), high-class artificial leather (surrounding portion)
  • Cable: parallel 6-strand, 2.5m full length, low-capacity special wide cable
  • Cable conductor:6N (99.9999%) annealed OFC with silver coating
  • Weight: 508g (1.1-lbs—including attached cable), 371g (0.8-lbs—without cable)

Drivability​

The STAX SR-X9000 was driven easily with every electrostatic headphone amplifier in house, inclusive of the near-entry level STAX SRM-500T.

Conclusion​

The new and undisputed flagship of the STAX earspeaker/headphone line is the STAX SR-X9000 electrostatic headphone! And after listening these past weeks, this was perhaps one of the easiest calls that I have made to date. Despite the fact that I have been listening to some truly incredible components from DACs to streamers to planar and magnetic headphones to cables and wires!

Did I mention how extraordinarily immersive the STAX SR-X9000 is? Well, you will experience the sounds, the emotion, the ambiance, the ease, and even the ‘sights’—silverware and dishes clinking, the muttered voices of the inconsiderate, a waitress taking orders, muffled coughs, miscues, etc. It will all seem tangible and will be incredibly new to a great many. It was new to me and I have ‘mad’ years and much experience in this HiFi thing. One listen.

It is hard to believe that a little more than six months ago I was heaping big praise on what I believed to be STAX’s flagship electrostatic headphone—the STAX SR-009S—of all time! And that it was, in every respect. But as mentioned above, things change. Without further adieu, we very highly recommend the STAX SR-X9000 and bestow to it our highest award—the DIAMOND AWARD—for excellence, as a headphone, regardless of driver technology, that is of unparalleled talent and abilities. And apparently, it does not need my Yellow-Chair-Tardis or a fancied Eames-Chair-Tardis, that I have my eye on, to go traveling about time and space to this venue then that. Bravo!

NOTE 1: Please make sure that the STAX SR-X9000 have at least 200 hours on them (8 straight days plus of running music through them) before critical listening or listening for pure, luxuriant pleasure.

NOTE 2: You will need an energizer to power the STAX SR-X9000 headphones. You'll want, without a doubt, if luxuriantly well-heeled, the Viva Egoista STX ($17,000, review coming @ AudiokeyReviews.com) otherwise the STAX SRM-T8000 ($6090) headphone amplifier, which is its technological and symbiotic mate and also an incredibly talented performer. Though the STAX SRM-700S|T ($3400) could certainly get things moving in a pinch.

audiokeyreviews.com
STAX REVIEW - AudioKeysMAGAZINE!

Attachments

  • 20210922_110221.jpg
    20210922_110221.jpg
    474.3 KB · Views: 0
  • 20210922_110401.jpg
    20210922_110401.jpg
    629 KB · Views: 0
  • 20210922_110548(1).jpg
    20210922_110548(1).jpg
    475.1 KB · Views: 0
  • 20210922_110401.jpg
    20210922_110401.jpg
    629 KB · Views: 0
CT007
CT007
Not a BHSE fan? I see you listed X9000 as 371g without cable, and the page header info lists it as 432g.

Comments

There are no comments to display.
Back
Top