I think we may be getting a little off track with discussion of the number of taps, though. My reading of post 3's discussion of Mojo's architecture is that Mojo uses the hardware of the FPGA differently, less out of concern for tap length than out of concern for power.
In Hugo the overriding constraint was the amount of logic available in its FPGA, to the point where IIRC Rob Watts has commented that Hugo doesn't save volume settings because he didn't even have enough FPGA gates left over for that. In Mojo the overriding constraint is not FPGA logic, but the energy dissipation of using that fabric (or using it at full speed), so (as I read John Franks' remarks on this) it was necessary to be creative in applying the built-in DSPs to solve the same problems. (The built-in DSPs are not made of general-purpose fabric, and thereby avoid some energy-consumption overhead.)
Since the newer generation of FPGAs that allowed Mojo's approach isn't in Hugo yet, a refreshed Hugo would have more logic available for features (saving volume settings for one thing) or performance (deeper noise shaping perhaps) and might gain in battery life as well. All entirely speculative on my part, but I think a Hugo refresh with newer FPGA tech does make a lot of sense.
In Hugo the overriding constraint was the amount of logic available in its FPGA, to the point where IIRC Rob Watts has commented that Hugo doesn't save volume settings because he didn't even have enough FPGA gates left over for that. In Mojo the overriding constraint is not FPGA logic, but the energy dissipation of using that fabric (or using it at full speed), so (as I read John Franks' remarks on this) it was necessary to be creative in applying the built-in DSPs to solve the same problems. (The built-in DSPs are not made of general-purpose fabric, and thereby avoid some energy-consumption overhead.)
Since the newer generation of FPGAs that allowed Mojo's approach isn't in Hugo yet, a refreshed Hugo would have more logic available for features (saving volume settings for one thing) or performance (deeper noise shaping perhaps) and might gain in battery life as well. All entirely speculative on my part, but I think a Hugo refresh with newer FPGA tech does make a lot of sense.