Darkvoice 336i & 336SE Tuberolling PartII
Dec 27, 2008 at 11:37 PM Post #61 of 14,518
Quote:

Originally Posted by Spareribs /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Can the 6AS7 be replaced with a 6080 tube for the Darkvoice?


Absolutely!
wink_face.gif
 
Dec 28, 2008 at 2:30 PM Post #64 of 14,518
Right, you would need one of each.

If you call them on the phone, they will tell you exactly what they have available.
 
Dec 28, 2008 at 6:10 PM Post #65 of 14,518
Quote:

Originally Posted by Skylab /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Right, you would need one of each.

If you call them on the phone, they will tell you exactly what they have available.



Thanks, I will have to call them I guess, because I couldnt find either of these tubes by myself either on this site or tubedepot. I also get confused with all the jargon - NOS/russian/svoteks so on and so forth.
If somebody can find these complementary tubes here or somewhere else please let me know...
 
Dec 28, 2008 at 9:48 PM Post #67 of 14,518
Just want to say my TS-5998 have arrived and I'm liking it very much. I was using a 1965 Svetlana bought off ebay and thought they sounded quite good, it was certainly better than the non-NOS RCA 6AS7G I was using before.

But the TS is just something else, the difference is like 'night and day'
eek.gif
eek.gif
eek.gif
The bass is amazing, tight, control and there's lots of it
biggrin.gif
 
Dec 28, 2008 at 11:07 PM Post #68 of 14,518
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ash /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Is this an acceptable pair?

Tung-Sol 6SN7GTB
and
Russian 6H13C / 6AS7G

There are so many options....
frown.gif



No. I wouldn't buy either of those. PM me and I will help.
 
Dec 28, 2008 at 11:12 PM Post #70 of 14,518
The 6H13C isn't a bad tube but what you want are Svetlana's if you;re going to go that route, and I think the RCA 6AS7G is better. And those re-issued Tung-Sol's are NOT good sounding.
 
Dec 29, 2008 at 2:36 AM Post #71 of 14,518
Quote:

Originally Posted by Skylab /img/forum/go_quote.gif
The 6H13C isn't a bad tube but what you want are Svetlana's if you;re going to go that route, and I think the RCA 6AS7G is better. And those re-issued Tung-Sol's are NOT good sounding.


Man I hear so many conflicting things about the new reissues of the Tung Sol & Mullard line. I'm beginning to think that opinions and actual quality of the tube vary on a tube by tube basis. A lot of people say the Tung Sol 12AX7 is good,etc,etc. You wonder if they're atleast built with old Tung Sol/Mullard tooling. Crazy stuff,man.
 
Dec 29, 2008 at 2:02 PM Post #72 of 14,518
Re-issued/current production 6SN7's are amont the worst of the currently made tubes, IMO, when compared to the vintage tubes.
 
Dec 29, 2008 at 4:01 PM Post #74 of 14,518
They may well have. All 5998's were Tung-Sol made, and they did rebrand them for people.

Also just a reminder that the GE-made 5998A is *not* the same tube as the 5998. It will work in the same applications, but has a plate structure much more like a 6AS7G and does not sound as good (IMO) as a "real" 5998.
 
Dec 29, 2008 at 5:07 PM Post #75 of 14,518
Quote:

Originally Posted by Skylab /img/forum/go_quote.gif
They may well have. All 5998's were Tung-Sol made, and they did rebrand them for people.


Does this mean that regardless of brand, if a tube says 5998 on it, chances are that it's a genuine TS-5998?

Great, I took a chance and bought the IBM 5998 in the FS Forum. The pictures posted on there does look like a TS-5998
smily_headphones1.gif
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top