My Headphone Mini Review/Shootout... 56k Warning
Jan 15, 2006 at 2:39 PM Thread Starter Post #1 of 4

MrJoshua

500+ Head-Fier
Joined
Jan 9, 2005
Posts
891
Likes
19
OK, so I thought I'd take some photos of my headphone (not including IEM) collection, but it turned into a mini shootout!

So, the conteders:

Beyerdynamic DT531
Beyerdynamic DT990 Pro
Sennheiser HD25 SP
Yamaha HP-3 "Orthodynamic Headphones"

The Test:

Track 6 on the STAX Binaural CD (Native African Singing and Drumming)

The Equipment Used:

Yamaha "Natural Sound" CDX-596 CD Player
1m Unknown RCA (mid/high end consumer)
Cambridge Audio C500 Pre-Amp
10m Unknown RCA (mid/high end consumer)
Maplins SP-19 4 Way RCA Switch Box
0.5m QED QNEX2 RCA
Meier Audio HA-1 MKII Headphone Amp

The brief review:

The Beyerdynamic DT531's sounded somewhat ragged and muffled at the top end. I used to think these cans sounded great, but after listening to the DT990 Pro's for a few days, going back to these isn't a great experience. I don't think I like these headphones much any more. They are about a year old now and the cushioning inside the earpads has compressed quite significantly and the cables going to each phone has become twisted and I can't get it straight again. This is probably due to me sleeping in them so much
rolleyes.gif
.
I had to use the amp at about half volume with these headphones to get them to a level I was happy with.

The Beyerdynamic DT990 Pro's sounded amazing, very detailed and crisp. I don't know much about the technical words I should be using, but they just sounded great. Everything was crystal clear and not at all tiring to listen to. The bass from the drums was controlled and clear. These headphones are only a few days old and still smell new. They look very robust and have a curly cable going to only one of the phones, so it doesn't look like the cable will get tangled.
I had to use the amp at almost full volume with these headphones to get them to a level I was happy with.

The Sennheiser HD25 SP's sounded "small" with no real hint of soundstage. Bass was very present but wasn't very controlled. There was a weird feeling with these headphones.... I can't really describe it, but it sounded like it was out of phase. I've just checked and the letters R and L are facing out on the plugs at the bottom of each phone, so I imagine that's correct. These are probably 7 years old and the vinyl on the cups has worn through in places and the cable going to each phone has twisted quite badly and can't be straightened.
I had to use the amp at just under half volume to get them to a level I was happy with.

The Yamaha HP-3 "Orthodynamic Headphones" were purchased by my Mum in about 1982, second hand, for either £8 or £13. I'm not sure how much that amount of money was worth back then (can only be sure that it was worth more than it is now!). So, they're old. The vinyl on the cups has cracked realy badly, but apart from that, they look ok. Regarding the sound, I expected them to sound rubbish. However I was really, really excited about the quality. They were clear as a bell and had great soundstage for almost closed cans. They seemed to work really well with this test track. I know that they don't handle sub bass (Jungle) very well, as I tried using them when I started DJ'ing years ago (which is why I bought the Senns actually), but with more subtle music, I think they're great! The actual phones are about the same size as the Senns, but the headband is a lot wider and more comforable.
I had to use almost full volume on the amp to get them to a level I was happy with.

Conclusion:

The Beyerdynamic DT990 Pro's were my favorite by far. Sounded fantastic and were really comfortable.

The Yamaha HP-3's were a huge shock as they sounded great with this test track. For Superaural headphones, they were actually very comfy, even though the vinyl was badly cracked. Not bad for a pair of 25+ year old headphones!

The Beyerdynamic DT531's came next I suppose, but I've really gone off these cans.

The Sennheiser HD25 SP's came last due to the wierd sound and uncontrolled, bloated bass.

Photos:

Beyerdynamic DT990 Pro:

Headphone-Shootout-001.jpg


Headphone-Shootout-013.jpg


Headphone-Shootout-014.jpg


Headphone-Shootout-015.jpg


Yamaha HP-3 "Orthodynamic Headphones"

Headphone-Shootout-004.jpg


Headphone-Shootout-005.jpg


Headphone-Shootout-006.jpg


Headphone-Shootout-007.jpg


Beyerdynamic DT531

Headphone-Shootout-002.jpg


Headphone-Shootout-011.jpg


Headphone-Shootout-012.jpg


Sennheiser HD25 SP

Headphone-Shootout-003.jpg


Headphone-Shootout-008.jpg


Headphone-Shootout-009.jpg


Headphone-Shootout-010.jpg


biggrin.gif
 
Jan 16, 2006 at 6:26 PM Post #2 of 4
Thanks for all the comments guys
rolleyes.gif


tongue.gif
 
Jan 16, 2006 at 7:46 PM Post #3 of 4
OK, I'll start it by saying, that this is a very informative review for cans, which are not very popular atleast at the moment, but very intriguing for me. Interesting that you don't find the 990's sibillant and too bassy. It would be interesting to include the HD25 in the bunch.
Thanks for the review.
 
Jan 16, 2006 at 8:37 PM Post #4 of 4
Hi

Yeah, I realise the 990 Pro's are not this month's "must have can", maybe that will be next month lol.

I think they suit my recordings perfectly (a lot of bass heavy music). I haven't noticed any sibilance so far (something that I hate beyond belief!), they just sound very crisp.

The HD25 SP's are old and very well used in a semi-pro (DJ) environment, so that's probably why they've not fared so well (looking at the photos, they look knackered!). I bought these to DJ with, and I've never thought they sounded very musical. I suggest the straight HD25's would probably sound much better. I'd like to have a listen to them some time.

I'd be interested to hear from anyone who knows anything about the Yamaha's... Were they high-end when they were released new?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top