Tidal vs. Qobuz - what the schiit?
(I wrote this last night, pretty late, and saved a draft. Edited for clarity this morning.)
How can Qobuz sound so much [different?/better!] than Tidal? It's kinda freaking me out, because there is a marked difference, and I favor Qobuz. I was an early adopter of Tidal, and I haven't cancelled my subscription yet, but I must say that Qobuz just hits my ears in all the right places... <g>
To be clear, I'm not comparing Qobuz's FLAC content with
@OldRoadToad 's favorite Tidal format, MQA... Tidal
is moving to deprecate MQA, and a lot of songs on the service have already been converted to 44.1/16 or /24 FLAC. In every case, I am comparing FLAC to FLAC, and I'm matching bit rates / bit depths. I have strived to match levels to within 0.5 db. BTW, it seems that Qobuz is about 1-2db 'louder' than Tidal on my system, YMMV.
I used Soundiiz (
thank you, Qobuz, for the free access pass!) to convert my playlists, albums and artist lists from Tidal to Qobuz. It's a brilliant application, btw. I'd have bought a license if had I needed to...
Key conclusions, 72 hours in: Qobuz is a totally different experience than Tidal, in terms of apparent dynamic range, and overall "
punch". The pace of music streamed from Qobuz just ffllllooooows... IMHO as good or even possibly better than local Redbook playback with a stable transport feeding Yggy.
As I've recently made a major upgrade to my analog playback chain, I might say that music streamed from Qobuz by my AURALiC Aries G1, and delivered to Yggy via AES/EBU is so damned close to 'analog' that I'm wondering
why I keep spending money on analog... #fetish #firstworldproblems I'm upstairs in my office, listening to the downstairs system and I keep waiting to hear the "...tick...tick...tick" of a stylus in a lead-out groove. Bowie's "Lazarus", anyone? Oh, my goodness. Never heard an internet stream sound like this before. The echo that hovers just below his voice in parts of the vocal? I've never heard it before, and now I'm hearing that effect while sitting in another room, on another floor of the house... it's nuts. Simply nuts.
All of this would be for naught if I didn't have a Yggdrasil. I feel compelled to re-state, re-enforce, and re-confirm that it is a
spectacular piece of kit, and certainly one of the best deals in audio today. I (recently) spent an afternoon listening to a friend's system that sports a DAC that costs (almost) 20x more, and honestly? It's not markedly better in
any audible way. I want to upgrade my Yggy to the new case style, but I may just make the (executive) decision to buy a new one and hold on to my OG (w/A2 and Unison) machine. I always knew that Yggy is special, since I first heard what it can do with CD playback over digital coax. I think that Mike once said that 44.1/16 is really all you need. Well, Yggy is the embodiment of that ethic. I am still so very impressed with this DAC, and I feel no need to replace it at any time in the near future.
/end_schiit_ad
The AURALiC is also a wonderful piece of gear, but I could never figure out why CD playback (
and bit-perfect 44.1/16 rips, stored on a 0.5TB thumb-drive, connected to the USB Storage port) often sounded audibly 'better' than Tidal streams... and then I tried Qobuz. I'm frustrated that I didn't try it, sooner.
More to come, as I'm still trying to wrap my ears around the differences.
p.s. - (last night, I was) listening to Lara Fabian covering Sarah McLaughlin's "
In the Arms of an Angel" at CD quality, on Qobuz via the AURALIC. It sounds clearer and more spacious in presentation than the same album played on CD locally. So weird... can't explain this phenomena.
p.p.s. - another conundrum: 44.1/16 data, upsampled by the AURALiC- via any of the four available digital filters - does
not sound as good/smooth/pleasing as a native hi-rez stream from Qobuz, sent via AES/EBU 'digital' to Yggy. Bits are bits, my a**.
Thanks for listening,
/ds