This is an odd way to start a review on a pair of Senn 595 headphones. Nonetheless, I'll start by saying that I love my Denon AHD5000 headphones. Weird start, eh? So why am I looking at the Senn 595 headphones? Well, my office listening situation has changed and I no longer need the isolation offered by the Denon's. In fact, there are times when it is a problem. Therefore, I've been looking for a new pair of open-back headphones for the office.
I have a pair of Senn 590's at home that I quite like...but I want to keep them at home. I also have a pair of Grado 225's I occasionally enjoy, but are not a great choice for the extended amount of time I wear headphones at work. Based on my fondness for the 590's, the generally positive reviews here, and a killer deal at amazon.com ($130), I decided to order and audition a pair of 595's.
Right off the bat, let me say that burn-in is very critical for the 595. Each of my favorite headphones has benefited from a multi-day burn-in session. So it's no surprise that the HD595 needed a break-in period as well. The surprise is how shallow the improvement curve was initially. The other headphones (HD590, Grado 225, Denon AHD5000) all started out lacking detail and impact, but after a few hours each at least started to reveal their *potential*. OTOH, the 595's remained boring and flat during two straight days of continuous burn-in (interspersed silence MP3's every few hours). It was only after 2 days that there was any signficant improvement and it took 3 days for the potential to start to emerge. If I had stopped the burn-in at 3 days, I would have returned them. However, it was the weekend (making it inconvenient to return) and by 4 days the 595's were close to the 10+ year old 590's in warmth and probably better in detail. I'm now well pleased with them and they're not going back.
Comparing the 595's to the Denon's isn't a fair contest. The Denon's are easily my favorites, even if the bass is occasionally overwhelming. However, for some types of music the 595's might actually be better for my taste. Diana Krall, for example, really shines on the 595 whereas on the Denon's you have to supress the bass to bring Diana's vocals and piano out. In fact, I think I prefer the 595 for many jazz pieces and the bass actually a bit more detailed than the Denons. On the other hand, throw on some Lady Gago or Daft Punk and I definitely want the Denon phones.
Compared to the 590, the sound is very similar. My 590's are very old and worn...perhaps that gives the 595 a bit of an edge on detail, but OTOH the 590's are much much more comfortable. The earpads on the 595 are a bit stiff and plasticy compared to the very cushion-soft 590's; of course, that might just be due to the age of 590's. The 590 also has a detachable cable whereas the 595 has a fixed cable. However, to make up a bit for that, the 595 does come with a very nice headphone holder that can clamp to a desktop, shelf, or bookcase side (about a $20 value). I think I prefer the 590 overall, but it's not a huge gap.
Compared to the Grado, the 595 does not have the detail or clarity of the 225. However, the bass (after lots of burn-in) is probably better on the 595. Note that I have modded the Grado's with the circumaural "salad bowl" pads from the GS1000 as well as a JMoney headband. I did the comparisons with both sets of Grado pads. The comfort is way way better on the 595 compared to either the original or circumaual Grado pads.
Interestingly, even though the Grado probably has better sound quality, the 595 and the Grado occupy the same niche in my office rotation of headphones. Because of the comfort offered by the 595, I'm going to use it (rather than the Grados) in rotation with the Denons. I am definitely enjoying these...after a good break-in period, of course.
I have a pair of Senn 590's at home that I quite like...but I want to keep them at home. I also have a pair of Grado 225's I occasionally enjoy, but are not a great choice for the extended amount of time I wear headphones at work. Based on my fondness for the 590's, the generally positive reviews here, and a killer deal at amazon.com ($130), I decided to order and audition a pair of 595's.
Right off the bat, let me say that burn-in is very critical for the 595. Each of my favorite headphones has benefited from a multi-day burn-in session. So it's no surprise that the HD595 needed a break-in period as well. The surprise is how shallow the improvement curve was initially. The other headphones (HD590, Grado 225, Denon AHD5000) all started out lacking detail and impact, but after a few hours each at least started to reveal their *potential*. OTOH, the 595's remained boring and flat during two straight days of continuous burn-in (interspersed silence MP3's every few hours). It was only after 2 days that there was any signficant improvement and it took 3 days for the potential to start to emerge. If I had stopped the burn-in at 3 days, I would have returned them. However, it was the weekend (making it inconvenient to return) and by 4 days the 595's were close to the 10+ year old 590's in warmth and probably better in detail. I'm now well pleased with them and they're not going back.
Comparing the 595's to the Denon's isn't a fair contest. The Denon's are easily my favorites, even if the bass is occasionally overwhelming. However, for some types of music the 595's might actually be better for my taste. Diana Krall, for example, really shines on the 595 whereas on the Denon's you have to supress the bass to bring Diana's vocals and piano out. In fact, I think I prefer the 595 for many jazz pieces and the bass actually a bit more detailed than the Denons. On the other hand, throw on some Lady Gago or Daft Punk and I definitely want the Denon phones.
Compared to the 590, the sound is very similar. My 590's are very old and worn...perhaps that gives the 595 a bit of an edge on detail, but OTOH the 590's are much much more comfortable. The earpads on the 595 are a bit stiff and plasticy compared to the very cushion-soft 590's; of course, that might just be due to the age of 590's. The 590 also has a detachable cable whereas the 595 has a fixed cable. However, to make up a bit for that, the 595 does come with a very nice headphone holder that can clamp to a desktop, shelf, or bookcase side (about a $20 value). I think I prefer the 590 overall, but it's not a huge gap.
Compared to the Grado, the 595 does not have the detail or clarity of the 225. However, the bass (after lots of burn-in) is probably better on the 595. Note that I have modded the Grado's with the circumaural "salad bowl" pads from the GS1000 as well as a JMoney headband. I did the comparisons with both sets of Grado pads. The comfort is way way better on the 595 compared to either the original or circumaual Grado pads.
Interestingly, even though the Grado probably has better sound quality, the 595 and the Grado occupy the same niche in my office rotation of headphones. Because of the comfort offered by the 595, I'm going to use it (rather than the Grados) in rotation with the Denons. I am definitely enjoying these...after a good break-in period, of course.