- Joined
- Jun 5, 2003
- Posts
- 5,449
- Likes
- 3,122
Having been a member of Head-fi for six years, I just wanted to discuss a growing trend I’ve noticed recently. It seems that more and more members get offended or defensive when people post negative or critical opinions about earphones they hold in high regard. It’s becoming downright cliquey. Whenever someone new jumps into a thread that has been developing with high praise and smitten comments with an opinion that is counter to the majority, the regulars inevitably take it personally and proceed to engage in attacking the new poster. Insults are thrown, the poster’s taste gets insulted, or worse, and it is not productive to open discussion or debate. It is astounding that these members get so worked up over counter opinions.
I am a regular poster in one of those long threads about an earphone that has mostly praise. A few posters in that thread make negative comments from time to time, and I don’t feel the need to attack those individuals with insults and offensive language. To me it’s no big deal if someone doesn’t like a model I have a huge appreciation for. Even if they want to use crude terminology like: ‘I think this earphone is a piece of rubbish’, or ‘to me this hunk of junk sounds no better than stock apple buds’. While I’ll admit terminology like this is not the most helpful for other people who might be considering the model, it still does not warrant offensive name-calling, or insulting their taste. There is a basic difference here between being critical of a product, and insulting a person.
I find nothing in the rules/terms of use that says someone can’t post negative impressions of an earphone or headphone.
So what does everyone think of this type of behavior? Isn’t it okay for a member to have a different view to someone else, and express it in their own words without others attacking, insulting, and trapping them, often enlisting the 'help' of the same people to gang up on the member? I know for a fact that one of the members (a new member no less- what a welcome to Head-fi) was very stressed and upset with the assaults.
Anyway, I'll leave this open to discussion, since I'm genuinely interested in what other members think about this.
I am a regular poster in one of those long threads about an earphone that has mostly praise. A few posters in that thread make negative comments from time to time, and I don’t feel the need to attack those individuals with insults and offensive language. To me it’s no big deal if someone doesn’t like a model I have a huge appreciation for. Even if they want to use crude terminology like: ‘I think this earphone is a piece of rubbish’, or ‘to me this hunk of junk sounds no better than stock apple buds’. While I’ll admit terminology like this is not the most helpful for other people who might be considering the model, it still does not warrant offensive name-calling, or insulting their taste. There is a basic difference here between being critical of a product, and insulting a person.
I find nothing in the rules/terms of use that says someone can’t post negative impressions of an earphone or headphone.
So what does everyone think of this type of behavior? Isn’t it okay for a member to have a different view to someone else, and express it in their own words without others attacking, insulting, and trapping them, often enlisting the 'help' of the same people to gang up on the member? I know for a fact that one of the members (a new member no less- what a welcome to Head-fi) was very stressed and upset with the assaults.
Anyway, I'll leave this open to discussion, since I'm genuinely interested in what other members think about this.