-
-
Ssns109 replied to the thread Four years after the L.K.S DA004: the Musetec DA005 DAC.Mostly I never feel the itch, certainly no lacking in sound quality feeding the itch, rather just audiophile curiosity. Devoid of any...
-
Ssns109 replied to the thread Four years after the L.K.S DA004: the Musetec DA005 DAC.I agree local files still sound slightly better than streams from Tidal, Qobuz through a multitude of music player software I have...
-
Ssns109 replied to the thread Four years after the L.K.S DA004: the Musetec DA005 DAC.Not surprised you find 005 superior to dacs you compared it to. I suspect the first thing most hear with 005 vs previous dacs is it's...
-
Ssns109 replied to the thread Four years after the L.K.S DA004: the Musetec DA005 DAC.Looks good on paper, hope this measures well, would give Musetec more credibility amongst some. While I'm still enjoying my 005 always...
-
Ssns109 replied to the thread Four years after the L.K.S DA004: the Musetec DA005 DAC.Congrats, that is one amazing pre! I too use DHT pre, Coincident Statement Linestage, 101D only in my case. As quality 101 tubes...
-
Ssns109 replied to the thread Four years after the L.K.S DA004: the Musetec DA005 DAC.I've never heard of this issue with others using spdif with 005, they report very nice sound quality, no veiling or lack of dynamics...
-
Ssns109 replied to the thread Four years after the L.K.S DA004: the Musetec DA005 DAC.I have tube pre and 845, 300B SET tube amps. I've had 005 for over two years, with many streaming and tube upgrades over that time. At...
-
Ssns109 replied to the thread Four years after the L.K.S DA004: the Musetec DA005 DAC.I don't doubt you're conclusions, and good luck with Topping. As for myself, recently added FMC in FRONT of server, this along with...
-
Ssns109 replied to the thread Four years after the L.K.S DA004: the Musetec DA005 DAC.Last night first listening session since ASR. Really trying to focus on some artifacts of relatively poor measurements, per usual I've...
-
Ssns109 replied to the thread Four years after the L.K.S DA004: the Musetec DA005 DAC.I agree, the bias issue may hit this dac. For what its worth, I had Okto Dac8 stereo at same time as 005, Okto better specs, 005 greater...
-
Ssns109 replied to the thread Four years after the L.K.S DA004: the Musetec DA005 DAC.I know you mentioned likely no feedback on output stage, couldn't Jimbo add feedback on that stage for better measurements? I suspect...
-
Ssns109 replied to the thread Four years after the L.K.S DA004: the Musetec DA005 DAC.I have dedicated lines, amps on their own line, no conditioner, prefer it that way with all amps I've ever owned. Everything else on diy...
-
Ssns109 replied to the thread Four years after the L.K.S DA004: the Musetec DA005 DAC.It is true, individual recordings, vinyl or digital have artifacts. I'm still getting to the bottom of this, only started hearing this...
-
Ssns109 replied to the thread Four years after the L.K.S DA004: the Musetec DA005 DAC.You also have to keep in mind the ESS chip "hump" or mid level output distortion rise. I do hear the above and the "hump" as slight...
-
Ssns109 replied to the thread Four years after the L.K.S DA004: the Musetec DA005 DAC.Nothing has changed, the dac will have exact same sound it had previous to review, the only difference is those purchasing by...
-
-
Loading…
-
Loading…
-
Loading…
-
Loading…
-
Loading…