Reviews by bcasey25raptor

bcasey25raptor

Aka: Brycon Casey
aka mental patient
aka Enter Darkness
aka Shurefan
aka reaperofaudio
aka everyone knows
aka very funny
Pros: bass, build, portability, smooth listening
Cons: highs and mids, uncomfortable
Ok i got these at my local best buy for $70.
 
For $70 i am quite surprised. The bass is definitely emphasized and these are excellent for electronic music. The highs are recessed but smooth and the mids are also recessed. These are only first day impression is can't say much else yet. But for what it's worth if you are basshead on a $70 budget get these.
 
Build quality though plastic is quite good. And they look sweet to me. Unfortunately they are uncomfortable for long listening sessions.
 
 
For the price what could you lose?
Dsnuts
Dsnuts
You guys know about the thick foam padding AKG threw inside the cup. You must take that out and guess what.. No more recessed highs and mids. Try that out. I was completely shocked at the sound change afterwards. Just stick your fingers in the cups and take the extra pads out it is that simple. I was told by another headfier when I did a review on these and what you know. The sound becomes so much better afterwards
Deep Funk
Deep Funk
A bit, but I still missed the K181. Yet, given its price also in the now cheaper K81 guise this headphone is very good for its purpose and price. The isolation alone...
UnityIsPower
UnityIsPower
Glade you could purchase and review them bcasey.. I find they make great gifts also. My gift recipient seems to love them just as I do.

bcasey25raptor

Aka: Brycon Casey
aka mental patient
aka Enter Darkness
aka Shurefan
aka reaperofaudio
aka everyone knows
aka very funny
Pros: Highs, mids, lows, accuracy, sound stage, smoothness, build quality, accesories, everything
Cons: Some people find them uncomfortable
I was for the longest time skeptical on these. Following intently on the srh940 thread the reviews were varied. Some people just up and claimed them to suck and sound fake while others praised them. When i purchased these i was afraid the naysayers may be correct. I received them and they are so wrong. These are the best headphones i have ever heard. These are smooth, detailed, neutral, fun, and revealing in a way that doesn't ruin enjoyment. Build quality also feels top notch to me. Way better built then the srh840.
 
 
Durability/Design
I prefer the color black for headphones but if there is anything to be said about the looks of these headphones it's that they look striking and expensive. Durability feels top notch other then the plastic extenders. I assume with extra care you should have no issues. 4.5/5 for durability/design.
 
 
Comfort
Opinions of comfort on these are varied. Some people think they are horrid. Others such as me think they are wonderful. I have never worn such a comfortable headphones unless you consider the bose ae2 to be a credible headphone. 5/5
 
Audio Quality
Heres where i got issues with the head-fi community. To me these are not harsh and very smooth, these are perfectly bassy enough and the mids are wonderful. These are perfect for rock/metal and i even deem them good enough for electronic music. The whole idea that these sound fake, lifeless, and have a bass hole is to far from the truth. Maybe to bass fanatics they are bass light but they have ideal bass for rock/metal imo.
 
These have a good enough soundstage and instruments separation to do rock/metal justice.
 
Sound quality gets a 5/5
 
Value/Overall
For $299 i feel i should worry about getting arrested for stealing. These are incredible. These are top of the line and sound amazing. If i hear another pair of headphones under $500 that sound this good then i would be surprised. These are magical, they do what no other headphone has done. This is what i was after. My audio nirvana has been reached.
5/5
 
I recommend this to anyone and everyone.
 
JamesMcProgger
JamesMcProgger
hey man, a brief sound comparison with your HD25 would be nice. if you have the time.
bcasey25raptor
bcasey25raptor
i will start a thread after more comparisons
JamesMcProgger
JamesMcProgger
thanks.

bcasey25raptor

Aka: Brycon Casey
aka mental patient
aka Enter Darkness
aka Shurefan
aka reaperofaudio
aka everyone knows
aka very funny
Pros: Build quality, looks, branding, bass, highs,
Cons: Fatiguing, tight fit, heavy, mids, unrealistic sound.
Yes everyone i know what you will say. After all the hate these got i listened at best buy and i thought they sounded pretty good. I hesitated to hand over my money but in the end i did to go with a review and perhaps keep them if i was satisfied enough. Well to my ears i am satisfied.
 
Durability/Design
These are the most durable pair of headphones i have ever used. Full metal construction and huge thick cords, The design is also eye catching and they look sleek. To most people looks matter and i am no different. I do like my tech to look good but sound comes before looks every time.
 
Comfort
The common consensus on comfort is that these are uncomfortable. I am inclined to agree. But it's no more uncomfortable then my grado's or my sennheisers. The durability makes up for the comfort.
 
Sound Quality/Value
In my opinion this is where these shine. Are they accurate and neutral? By deity no. These are colored bassy headphones. Although the bass is boomy i still find them Very fun for any genre. Metal shines on these and i find them more enjoyable then my other headphones. Dynamically my shure srh840 is better at $130 but they sound boring by comparison. These are primarily good for listening to music which is poorly recorded. It can make anything fun. These have a relatively v shaped sound signature. The bass is over emphasized while the mids are subdued. The highs are shiny and add fun to any song. Sound stage is nothing spectacular and instrument separation could be better but in all honesty it does it's job.
 
Now it's value is hard to pinpoint. For us audiophiles the $400 price point is not worth it. But even so if they were $300 i feel the average music listener would be over satisfied with these. Being $100 over priced is a problem but most people would buy these and not do any upgrading. In the long run this saves them money.
 
In the end i actually recommend these to anyone who wants a fun headphone that is really easy to drive and can be found at a local retailer. Hats off to monster for their marketing and leading some of them our way. We may act like these are evil by an evil corporation but many people including me have entered the hobby because of the likes of monster. I hope you enjoyed this review which was unbiased.
freakyflow
freakyflow
I got the Detox version for $250 ($300 after tax) a couple of weeks ago and I thought the sound quality is pretty good. I also got the Sennheiser 598 - it does have a bigger soundstage and better seperation. But I'm thinking about keeping the beats for when I'm going out as it isolates teh sound better and is arguably better for 'pop' music - do you think I should keep it at the price I paid?
bcasey25raptor
bcasey25raptor
Yes i do. They are worth it at $250. Now i wouldn't keep it if you paid the full $400.

bcasey25raptor

Aka: Brycon Casey
aka mental patient
aka Enter Darkness
aka Shurefan
aka reaperofaudio
aka everyone knows
aka very funny
Pros: treble, bass, speed, portable, easy to drive, design, value
Cons: Adidas marketing makes me look like a tool, comfort, price (depends), slightly scooped mids.
I have had these for a month now and i do feel these deserve a review
 
 
 
Build Quality/Design
To me i find these look beautiful. The durability is equally as great. All parts are replaceable if need be. When i first picked them up though i was thinking to myself (did i really pay $200 for these things?). They may look cheap but when you apply force you realize they are really well built. One thing i noticed was that they are made in ireland. Quite a nice touch when most things are made in china. The blue color is striking and i have had comments by people who thought they looked cool.
 
 
Comfort/Portability
These are quite uncomfortable unfortunately. If i were to make any complaint it's comfort. But after a month they have become easier on my ears. I put then on a large box to stretch them. These are very portable. They are easy to drive and are easy to store around your neck. The cord isn't to long so you don't have excess.
 
 
Sound Quality/Overall Value
Here is where these shine. When i first put these on i knew i had found my under $200 can of choice. The sound was impressive. Good bass response which goes quite deep and is very fast, Slightly laid back mids with boasted highs. The bass is good for any genre requiring bass. These do remarkably well with metal music in fact their my go to metal can. Electronic is also great as is rock. These aren't very good for classical though. The highs are very good. Allowing the headphones to shine. And they are recessed right where most guitar harshness appears allowing for an easier listening experience. Although They are revealing so if a recording is harsh you will hear it.
 
I recommend these if you listen to rock, metal, electronic, pop, or any speedy/aggressive genre.
 
Competition
I own the m50s and the srh840s and have owned the srh750dj. The srh840 is the most dynamic, the m50s is the most versatile, and the the sennheiser hd 25 1 ii is the most fun. I recommend this whole heartedly.
kiteki
kiteki
100% Adidas.
aQuickBit
aQuickBit
A very rational and simplistic review. You also included the type of music it shines in and all three of those are my favorite...mostly electronic and metal. Because of it I decided to go ahead and get these bad boys.
Mutnat
Mutnat
Great review and almost exactly in line with my experiences also. Although, I actually like the blue highlights and find the all-black non-Adidas version a bit boring looking. But I realize it's not for everyone. LOL.

bcasey25raptor

Aka: Brycon Casey
aka mental patient
aka Enter Darkness
aka Shurefan
aka reaperofaudio
aka everyone knows
aka very funny
Pros: Build quality, non-revealing, fun, bass, highs
Cons: mids, comfort, Price
(disclaimer: My rating scale is based off of what i paid for the headphones not msrp, Review is based off of what i think of them compared to their respective $150 price point)
 
 
     Ah the all mighty hyped best under $150 giant killers the m50s. Every noobs first step into audiophilia, and to many their last. Why is this such a popular headphone amongst noobs and the most recommended headphone on head-fi? I honestly don't know. There is nothing special about these headphones and they are far from giant killers beating out headphones 2x their price. I would be hesitant to pay the $150 they go for nowadays but for $96 dollars i feel they are great.
 
     Let's look at it's competition.
We have the shure srh440, 840, and 750dj, We have the sennheiser hd 25 1 ii. Of these i owned all but the 440s so i will leave them out of this review. The srh840 from shure can be had for a really cheap price of $130 which imo is a steal for what you get. While the sennheiser hd 25 1 ii is a lot more expensive but i still believe their $199 price point is justified. Of these 3 headphones i felt the sennheiser hd 25 1 ii were the funnest to listen to, the shure srh840 were the most detailed and accurate, so where does this leave the m50s? While they don't even compare. Some would call them an entirely different can altogether, i beg to differ. The m50s are relatively neutral but have a slight recession in the mid range. The highs though relatively extended are quite harsh and the louder you listen to them the more harsh they get. They also sound slightly muddy to me. Not hugely but ever so slightly. I don't understand their praise unless everyone bought them for $100. Even then i think they are decent until you reach their $150 price point. At that price the competition far surpasses the m50s leaving the m50s in the dust.
 
     I think the true value in these cans has to be their versatility in being able to handle any genre you throw at it. They sound impressive with electronic, Rock sounds fun and aggressive, Acoustic sounds lively (though a little fake to me), and classical has enough instrument separation to still be enjoyable. Sound stage on these cans however is quite closed in.
 
      Comfort on these is average, Shallow pads with little space to circumaurally cover your ears can be a little cramped and partly leads to this closed in sound stage. I ran with this data and applied the shure srh840 pads to these cans. Soundstage was definitely improved but at the expense of the aggression. Highs are tamed which is to me a good thing but some people would hate this. Also the bass is drastically reduced. The 840 pads improves the comfort exponentially however.
 
     Now the question is do i recommend these headphones? If you can get them under $130 then go for it. They are versatile and easy to drive, but at $130 better competition shows up. We get the shure srh840, and soon the sennheiser hd 25 1 ii. The srh440 for $80 may still beat out the m50s but i am yet to hear those.
 
     I draw my conclusion that like anything on the internet things are blown out of proportion. One person recommends someone to a noobie, noobie buys it and recommends it, then everyone recommends it and it spreads like a virus. The m50s are that virus but they aren't a bad one. In the last few months the m50 hype has died down exponentially based off of a more expensive price point. It's for the best even if the m50s have brought fun and enjoyment to thousands who have had the opportunity to purchase or audition a pair. I only hope we can grow to understand that like many things, just because it's popular doesn't mean it's the best.
 
 
Have a nice day and thank you for reading my review.
  • Like
Reactions: 3ternalDr4gon
Zubaru
Zubaru
thanks loved how you compared known headsets at same pricetag, good for a noob like me who just bought his first audiophile headset(SRH840).
Beef Anus
Beef Anus
840 and sennheiser hd 2 ii are over 200 in canada the m50 is 125 
KMSROX
KMSROX
I have used just about every type of cans on the market from very expensive to cheap throw away junk. They all have their place on your ears depending on not only the genre but also what one expects to get out of the music they are listening to as well as the mood one is in while listening. So many variables do come into play when listening and should be remembered when writing a review or recommendation about cans.
 
I think one of the most important things to remember is there are just about as many different types of cans as there are genre's these days. If you listen to one particular genre most of the time then finding a set of cans is pretty easy to weed out, however if you are eclectic like myself you have two choices, spending a lot of money for several different cans to fit your mood and the music you are listening to or buy a very versatile set of cans which the ATH M50's are.
 
I originally purchased the ATH M50's because my brand new Pioneer HDJ-1000's went kaput and I needed something right away and the place I get my cans were out of the Pioneer HDJ-1000's. After much research on the net I decided to get the ATH M50's and I am so glad I did.
 
I do a lot of studio work and if you look at the specs on the ATH M50's they are Professional Studio Monitors and not typical cans.  They have little to no wear in time. They are very well balanced as they should be for monitors so mixing is much more accurate. Most music studios have a few pairs of ATH M50's hanging near a mixing board, even in the recording room due to the clarity, comfort and accuracy.
 
When my replacement Pioneer HJD-1000's came I never once used them they laid in a box for 5 years and I gave them to my mom a couple of months ago. I did however purchase 3 pair of ATH M50's including the 50th anniversary limited edition in 2012 given it was also my 50th birthday and no I did not keep them in the box for a collectors thing, hell I am 50 I am using them, they are my main pair and look cool! I do have a non anniversary pair in the box that hasn't been opened yet as well as a couple more at each station. I do of course use studio monitors in the studio as well but I still prefer the studio monitor headphones for everything.
 
Listening loud, which by the way is not good for your ears believe me my hearing is not what it once was after 25 years as a professional drummer and all the studio time and now all the studio time mixing, mastering, reviewing and general listening to music.
 
The Pioneer HDJ-1000's were what I was using when I began working with Miljenko Matijevic the vocalist for Steelheart I listened to him hit those high notes and I, like most avid listeners of music, believe music just isn't good unless its loud. Well after 16 straight hours of listening to "I'll Never Let You Go" my right ear began to bleed. I had to refrain from wearing my cans for 3 days. The ATH M50's has it built in so they will not get loud enough to do that kind of damage to your ears. If you...

bcasey25raptor

Aka: Brycon Casey
aka mental patient
aka Enter Darkness
aka Shurefan
aka reaperofaudio
aka everyone knows
aka very funny
Pros: Fast, build quality, design, sound quality, user interface, camera,
Cons: ibuds, crappy phone speakers, smudge marks, some people complain about dropped calls, large monthly fee
Hello head-fi
 
I recently decided i would get my first smart phone and that it would be an iphone. Now i don't want to write a wall of words but i will do it anyways.
 
 
Design/Durability
When buying a smart phone which you take everywhere durability is very important. Plastic is generally the most commonly used material that tends to get the job done but looks cheap. Compared to competing smart phones the iPhone 4 has a glass front and glass back with a metal piece going around the phone. It looks amazingly expensive and feels premium. But the glass worries me. If i were to drop this from a decent hight the glass could crack or shatter. I recommend a heavy duty case. To some this is a deal breaker to others a compromise. But in my opinion it still feels more solid then the samsung i tried at the phone shop. 4/5
 
Battery Life/User Interface
Battery life is quite good. I can get 20 hours out of it before the battery dies. This is with a bit of usage of a mixture of everything. Phone calls, texting, music, gaming, internet browsing. I can do it all in a day and plug it in at the end and still have 25% left. The user interface is amazingly easy to use. Apple has done something amazing by making a user interface even a 5 year old could master in a few minutes. If there is a major selling point for this phone it's how simple it is to use. Battery 4/5. UI 5/5
 
Audio Quality
Everyone hates on the ipods and iphones for their supposed bad sound quality. I will say right now i don't hear their criticism. The sound is just as good as the fiio e7 if not better. The sound is very smooth and very dynamic. No harshness in the treble and the bass is well represented. I will have to deduct 1 point because the built in eq is really bad. But i just buy the equ app and it allows me to customize my eq. Very responsive and the sound quality is excellent for a portable. 4/5
 
Overall/Value
Overall there is thousands of apps, has good sound quality, looks great, durable, and fast. I would give it a 3/5 for value though because if you don't get a contract it will cost you about $750.
 
 
iPhone 4 video review

 
Slight comparison between iPods and iPhone

bcasey25raptor

Aka: Brycon Casey
aka mental patient
aka Enter Darkness
aka Shurefan
aka reaperofaudio
aka everyone knows
aka very funny
Pros: Good sound, detachable cords, price
Cons: a little to much bass, i have heard people having issues with them breaking, annoying design
So after a month of debating weather I should spring for the Shure SE215 I went for it. I only went for it because Shure has a really good warranty and if I need to use it I can.
 
Durability/Looks/Design/Comfort
Regarding durability and looks I find they look good because you don't even notice them under my hair. But durability wise i have heard reports of one side stop working. They look solid to me so far so only time will tell. The design and way they fit in the ear is annoying at first but you get used to it. IT irritates me though because i always have to move my hair all the time just to put them on. But once they are on they are solid and stay in place. I also find they are wonderfully comfortable and i can wear them all day. Just make sure you select the right tips.
 
Sound Quality
Here is the part everyone cares about the most. How do they sound? Well to answer that i will have to separate it into 3 categories.
 
Lows/Bass
This is where the headphones shine the most. They have plenty of bass and to me it is a little much but i think they would be good for bass heads. They tend to reach fairly low and seem rather fast in the bass.
 
Mids
The mids are rather scooped to the extent that vocals and guitars are a little faint. I have some issues with this but overall i am very satisfied with the mids on these. Just don't buy these expecting Shure's well known midrange.
 
Highs
Highs, what highs? Yes there is a somewhat high range here but it seems to be little. Although i am not surprised considering these drop off at 17khz but i feel the highs are very laid back and are very smooth sounding.
 
Conclusion
I find these are very bassy iems and not to be purchased if you want mid or high range performance. These would suit bass heads well imo. They are also very smooth and easy on the ears. Not harsh at all and that makes them very good for sensitive ears.
 
Overall Conclusion and Value
If your looking for sub $100 iems that are very easy on your ears are comfortable and have good bass get these. I feel they compare with my Shure SRH840 decently enough to justify the price. But be warned that these seem to have bad quality control.

bcasey25raptor

Aka: Brycon Casey
aka mental patient
aka Enter Darkness
aka Shurefan
aka reaperofaudio
aka everyone knows
aka very funny
Pros: Cheap, decent sound, portable,
Cons: design, flimsy wires, no off switch
I got these for $25 at futureshop. They are easily the best value audio equipment i have ever heard. Everything sounds clear and they are not revealing.
 
they may not be very detailed but they are still very fun and easy to listen to. They are not harsh, the mids are a little scooped, bass is boomy, and the highs are smooth.
 
they may not be that durable though as they have small cheap flimsy wires but i have had no issues. I also find the fact that the drivers are open and not covered by something to be a little cheap.
 
but all in all for $25 these beat out 90% of headphones i have tried. They may not beat my shure srh840 or my alessandro ms1 but they sure as hell make my music easy to listen to. That si something the other headphones struggle to do.
  • Like
Reactions: waveriderhawaii
BobSaysHi
BobSaysHi
Lol, you were right. I do have these. The mids are really thin. I've moved onto a cheap sub and speaker setup.

bcasey25raptor

Aka: Brycon Casey
aka mental patient
aka Enter Darkness
aka Shurefan
aka reaperofaudio
aka everyone knows
aka very funny
Pros: I got them free :D, sound decent, easy to listen to.
Cons: mids are scooped. over powering booming bass, short cord for back speakers, doesn't work with laptops fully,
I know it's a sin to compare speakers to headphones but I am going to do it anyways. I currently own Shure SRH840 and Grado, Alessandro MS1 Compared to these speakers i prefer the speakers for music. This is not because of sound quality or details (both of my headphones are much more detailed then these) but because of convenience. I will always think of headphones as more of a portable option for out and about use. Speakers are and will always be for home use more so then headphones.
 
 
Now time for the review.
 
I found the sound on these to be excellent for what i need them for. They are very good at hiding problems with music making listening to harshly recorded songs easier. Although the mids seem scooped so the guitars and vocals tend to be a bit muffled. I found the bass boomy and not very accurate. I generally have the bass at minimal settings and they sound fine that way.
 
They also seem rather durable and well made. I don't know all that much about speakers though so i can't say much else. I will say however that the sound quality gets worse the louder you play it. it does not scale well.
 
I hoped this helped you guys out.
 
 
But in all honesty, not bad for $0
 
 

bcasey25raptor

Aka: Brycon Casey
aka mental patient
aka Enter Darkness
aka Shurefan
aka reaperofaudio
aka everyone knows
aka very funny
Pros: amazing sound, good bass, clear highs/mids, comfortable
Cons: they look kind of ugly, questionable durability, open back
I ordered the alessandro ms1 on june 15/2011 and they just arrived today. after many delays from canada post and their strike i finally received it.
 
i am incredibly impressed and pleased with my purchase.
 
let's start my review
 
Durability/Design
if i had to complain about anything on these headphones i think it would have to be be the looks and durability. after holding them in my hands i noticed they are made of plastic.and look quite unappealing. durability wise the cord seems a little loosely connected to the headset and i feel twisting might harm it. also they are open back so this makes it hard to take places. they are masters of noise leakage.
 
Update: The screw which screws the extender to the ear cup has become loose and it keeps falling out. It's not a huge issue as the headphones still work and when their on your head they don't fall out, but it is really annoying.
 
Comfort
many people say grado's are uncomfortable. well perhaps they are correct. but these are really comfortable. their lightweight and have comfortable pads.
 
Sound Quality
ok so this is the most important part. this is only a first impressions so it might change after i get used to it. sound quality is for the most part amazing. these are not harsh or abrasive and they are not honest making listening to badly recorded music more fun. these have loads of bass. those who say they don't are crazy. they are really fast headphones and the mids are very present. the highs are not harsh or sibilant.
now im a metalhead and listen to almost exclusively metal so this is my impressions on that matter.
 
electric guitar is very forward and fun. it has the energy it needs to have. drums are very present. and bass has a very forward sound to.
 
now folk metal is another thing. with my shure srh840 i find flutes and folk instruments hard to listen to. these make them clear fun and not screechingly harsh.
 
now i don't have very much experience with headphones so take my review with a grain of salt but i feel that for $99 these are definitely worth it.
 
now stop reading this review and buy a pair.
 
 
  • Like
Reactions: rocksteady65
bcasey25raptor
bcasey25raptor
can't say much for their iems but i know their headphone line is top notch value for the most part.
Wolham
Wolham
I have to disagree with you, bcasey. Though I bought the 109$, i-version. I find that while the bass is present, of course, the headphones are very lacking in bass; the bass is not loud, and absolutely not booming. And I like booming bass. Gives the music a little extra punchieness. Also, I find that the drums sort of get in the background, which is also to my disliking. What I enjoy is that the music sounds very clear, making my old headphones sound muddy in comparison.
bcasey25raptor
bcasey25raptor
wolham, everyone may have different experiences. i heard the non i version has more bass.

bcasey25raptor

Aka: Brycon Casey
aka mental patient
aka Enter Darkness
aka Shurefan
aka reaperofaudio
aka everyone knows
aka very funny
Pros: durable, has an amp
Cons: sounds worse then my onboard and ipod.
ok everyone i am probably going to get hate for this but i should have ordered the grado sr60s instead. my conexant hd audio sound on my laptop is obviously onboard. from the opinion and belief of people on head-fi is that onboard is terrible. they recommended i buy the fiio e7. so i got $200 for a graduation present and decided to get a fiio e7. i was certain it would make a difference as everyone has been praising it. so after 8 days it arrives. i am so excited to hear what i have been missing. i quickly plug it in and let it charge a bit. i plug my shure srh840 in and at first (placebo effect) i think they sound phenomenal. then after a few songs i plugged my shure srh840 into my computers audio input. and guess what? it is actually clearer and sounds fuller. correct me if i am wrong but i thought there was supposed to be a difference with the fiio e7. i was under the impression it was better then on board sound. i give it an overall 2.5/5 because it has an amp. but other then that this thing is not worth it. i am sorry but maybe this is really just snake oil.  if anyone of you guys are new here. avoid at all costs. none of this improves anything. and the higher up you go the less of an improvement you achieve. i am done with dacs. my on board seems really good in comparison.
  • Like
Reactions: julian67
Saltticus
Saltticus
I have a FiiO E7 and I bought it to replace the Realtek in my laptop. The E7 makes my SR80is clearer and instrument separation has also improved. I do have doubts on it being worth the money though. I am currently considering returning the product and spending the money on better cans (ATH-AD900). I feel like the marginal benefits would be much greater. I plan on buying another dac/amp later, but one that is slightly more future-proof as the E7 cannot handle files with 24-bit sample sizes.
Sound Quest
Sound Quest
It's "snakeoil" to your ears, but not to everybodies ears.
Sure, there are better DAC's out there that will make a huge difference to cheap on-board soundcards. But the FIIO E7 does its job reasonably well for it's price point.

I would only really recommend this amp for closed headphones through. They don't see to give Open Headphones quite enough juice to make them sound right.
GainsbarreAudio
GainsbarreAudio
I was really reluctant about this E7 amp because I did not like the sound of the Fiio X3 I bought before, so if this amp was ''SnAkE OiL'' i''ll be quite pre-programmed to don't fall in this trendy trap. Still, after selling my X3 I suddenly need a dac for my mac and ipod...don't like Ipod sound too so my curiosity lend me to the E7. An affordable Amp with a (WOLFSON) Dac and lot of features for like 70-80$ sure sound intriguing to me. This is Not ''true Audiophile grade stuff'', but I must admit it sound pretty good and I sincerly feel and hear subtle difference in audio quality and this is what we crave for when we listen. The sound isn't perfect at all, we can find hiss if we listen loudly with sensible iem, the dynamic can lack in clear separation but the overall presentation is better than the source (if the source is not HIFI), the sound of my mac is fuller, richer, wider and have more treble than before-I can hear the Wolfson signature sound here.The fact that this is a portable amp too make it a no brainer
ps:That's true to that the E7 isn't a Powerfull beast, not sure it can drive properly headphones above 64ohm headphones...

bcasey25raptor

Aka: Brycon Casey
aka mental patient
aka Enter Darkness
aka Shurefan
aka reaperofaudio
aka everyone knows
aka very funny
Pros: boosts volume and bass, excellent sound quality
Cons: slight hiss on quiet songs, had to order online
the fiio e5 is excellent value and is my first headphone amplifier. i bought my shure srh840 around early march and wasn't 100% satisfied so i wanted an amplifier. i didn't listen to everyone when they said my headphones wouldn't benefit and i was right to do so. these improve both the treble and bass. also it allows me to play louder without a degradation in sound quality. i also ordered a fiio l3 lod which makes it sound crisper with my ipod classic. i think everyone on head-fi should try this a tleast once.

bcasey25raptor

Aka: Brycon Casey
aka mental patient
aka Enter Darkness
aka Shurefan
aka reaperofaudio
aka everyone knows
aka very funny
Pros: build quality, user interface, battery life
Cons: value, audio quality, screen scratches easily
i bought this used off a friend of mine over 2.5 years ago and it still works amazingly. i rock boxed it and the eq makes it worthwhile
if you where to buy it new for full price however i suggest you look elsewhere. the sound quality is absolutely atrocious. i mean literally atrocious. unless eq'd it sounds like a muddy distorted mess and can be very boring. rock box gives you a better equalizer making it better but you have to turn up the treble and bass by 2 or 3 db's to make it enjoyable.
 
Sylverant
Sylverant
You mean 5G 80gb right? I swore I saw of picture of your stuff in the Headfi station thread and you had both the 5G and 6G. Its just the 6G isn't compatible with rockbox; I own it and wish it was. How is rockbox? Its looks like a very complete package codec wise but I'm not sure owning an older iPod is worth it. I loved the 1g nano though and the 4g iPod had the same exact dac. I agree with you about build quality, its impeccable.
bcasey25raptor
bcasey25raptor

bcasey25raptor

Aka: Brycon Casey
aka mental patient
aka Enter Darkness
aka Shurefan
aka reaperofaudio
aka everyone knows
aka very funny
Pros: UI, Battery life, Cool design
Cons: Cheaply made, crappy sound quality, cheap audio jack plugin, value
I bought mine a little over 6 months ago and it already crapped out on me, cheap apple quality that doesn't stand up to fair use. Audio jack plug in is extremely cheap so don't use heavy duty headphones. Screen scratches easily and the metal back plate doesn't hold up well over time. Get an iPod classic if you insist on an apple mp3 player. way better built and mine is still going at 3.5 years later.
 
Last but not least this iPod is extremely over priced. Though I think the 4th generation might be better built. Possibly look into it.
 
edit: after contacting apple about my problem they quickly resolved it and sent me a new one. i boasted my ratings in value and overall to show this.

bcasey25raptor

Aka: Brycon Casey
aka mental patient
aka Enter Darkness
aka Shurefan
aka reaperofaudio
aka everyone knows
aka very funny
Pros: clear sound, comfort, perfect bass, good midrange, good highs, around the ear design
Cons: durability, very revealing, sibilance, strident upper mids/lower highs can be a little annoying
Disregard my earlier hate for these have come to appreciate these for what they are.
 
COMFORT
To start off my review i would like to say my opinions on comfort with these. Lots of people complain about them being uncomfortable or heavy, the truth of the matter is they feel rather light to me. Are people here really weak or something? i find these really comfortable, but just like all pairs of headphones i have tried they become irritating on my right ear after a while. This is due to my ears lately being really sensitive to touch, and is not the fault of the headphones. 
 
DURABILITY
Lets go to the next thing on the list, Durability. the common belief is that these are highly durable and can take a bit of a beating. yes to some extent this is true, the headband is very bendable and can survive day to day bending and twisting. BUT the plastic extender is very cheap feeling to me and i feel it could snap with the slightest twist or stretch. I also find the metal piece that connects the headband to the headphones is rather weak and with slight pressure it would snap. I know these things occur as i have read about it occurring from members of this site, and i can see it happening. I also fear for the cords jutting out the side of these headphones, i feel that the slightest pull or snag of that cord would cause it to rip or snap. Overall i give the durability/design a 3/5 as its not bad but still has it's faults. These headphones can last a long time with proper care, but be careful.
 
SOUND QUALITY
Time for the most important feature of any pair of headphones, HOW IT SOUNDS. The sound is very clear for the most part. They emphasize mid range so vocals and guitars stand out really well. These have the perfect amount of bass for me, although bass heads wouldn't be satisfied. The highs are presented well also. But for all the good of these headphones there is still some bad. these are very revealing so if you listen to a lot of poorly recorded music it will sound bad. These have strident upper mids/lower highs which cause a bit of irritation, they don't bug most people but they sure as heck bugs me. These are also sibilant, but that is understandable when musicians use these to record their albums. In terms of genres these sound good with, these do everything fairly well, but these tend to be a little slow for fast genres of music.
I found classical and old country/rock sounds really good with these.
Rap also sounds good as does pop.
Rock sounds good but like i mentioned its a little slow and some people might not like it.
Metal is the same as rock.
Folk music sounds impressive.
Unfortunately i haven't tried jazz.
But i have come to appreciate these for what they are and ignore the shortfalls. These are excellent for the money, especially if you get them for what i got them for. For $130 i can't complain. 
 
VERDICT
If you are a beginner in the field of audio and want something to start with these are a good buy, is there better out there? You bet, but for the price to performance ratio of these you can't go wrong. They don't do anything to badly and are decently cheap. They also make a good alternative to the Audio Technica ATH M50 as these are more neutral and have better mids. I would say these are great for entering the field of audio. Anyone have any doubts? Then go try a pair at a local shop if you can, you might just wind up with a pair.
TjPhysicist
TjPhysicist
Just bought these, and good to know im not going crazy regarding the strident upper-mids. Not sure id have described it the same way, but something in the "higher" frequency range gets all wierd and graty.

Does this get better with burn in btw? Like i can't listen to metal or nu-metal anymore, linkin park sounds like someone recorded it with a tin can whilst dragging it across the floor. And a few random songs like "the man's too strong" by dire straits sounds very wierd in some places like theres someoen scraping metal in the back VERY slight almost indistinguishable but it annoying after a while and gets to me...
LeoTheAwesome
LeoTheAwesome
Hi man. Doesn't the headphone slips out every time you look down? If I'm in my office and i have to read something near my chest and i have to look down in a steeper angle those buggers always try to make a run for it! Even if i get a sms and my phone is right bellow me, i have to move my head slowly, otherwise the momentum of the headphones make them slip away..
 
I do agree that they are not heavy as in it will make your neck sore, but i think that they should be tighter around the head a little tinny bit. 
LeoTheAwesome
LeoTheAwesome
BTW.. I love those SRH840... As a reference headphone i don't think they can be beat for the price...
Im quite inclined to get a Grado 80i for 'fun' listening tho... 

bcasey25raptor

Aka: Brycon Casey
aka mental patient
aka Enter Darkness
aka Shurefan
aka reaperofaudio
aka everyone knows
aka very funny
Pros: sound quality, comfort, cheap
Cons: a little to much bass
i actually got the panasonic hje120 but it doesn't seem to be on this website. so this review is for the hje120.
in my opinion they have excellent bass and are very comfortable. the mids are recess and  the highs are also recessed. but for $12 i think they are amazing. they actually sound better then the beats imo. this is a good starter iem or for people that just want a cheap solution to portability. highly recommended.

bcasey25raptor

Aka: Brycon Casey
aka mental patient
aka Enter Darkness
aka Shurefan
aka reaperofaudio
aka everyone knows
aka very funny
Pros: sound quality, looks, portability, comfortable
Cons: build quality
i cannot give you a price comparison or compare it to others in its price range as i was given these as a gift. but i loved these things. the bass was impressive, good highs, and smooth mids. although they tend to be a little unclear sometimes i find them to sound very enjoyable and stunning. they didn't distort or clip at all and i noticed no sibilance at all. the only thing i can complain about is build quality. the wires are thin and get damaged easily thats what happened to mine. one ear got quieter and eventually quit on me. but for sound quality and music enjoyment i highly recommend these to anyone.

bcasey25raptor

Aka: Brycon Casey
aka mental patient
aka Enter Darkness
aka Shurefan
aka reaperofaudio
aka everyone knows
aka very funny
Pros: noise cancelling works well enough if you are not moving, generally comfortable
Cons: sound quality, build quality
i got these for $40 and for the price there is a lot of better options out there. basically your paying $20 for noise cancelling and $20 on headphones. they sound liek your average set of $20 on ear headphones. not very good at all. but if your on a tight budget and need noise cancelling these are an ok option if you don't care about sound quality. you've been warned.

bcasey25raptor

Aka: Brycon Casey
aka mental patient
aka Enter Darkness
aka Shurefan
aka reaperofaudio
aka everyone knows
aka very funny
Pros: comfortable
Cons: sound quality, build quality, very big
i got these for xmas a few years ago and i have been able to fully burn them in and give my impressions on these headphones. sound quality wise they are very boring. not really any bass at all and they are very unclear. the mids and highs sound harsh and you cannot understand a single word anyone is singing. i will leave it that for the same price you can get the portapros which i have heard are so much better. if you are on a budget get those. also these are really bulky and look atrociously ugly. though i find them rather comfortable but this is due to the fact they are light and they don't clamp much at all.

bcasey25raptor

Aka: Brycon Casey
aka mental patient
aka Enter Darkness
aka Shurefan
aka reaperofaudio
aka everyone knows
aka very funny
Pros: thyey are portable
Cons: sound quality, durability, looks, comfort
utter trash for the price. get some sony in ears instead anything is better then these imo.
Back
Top