My preferred sound signature: A bit bass heavy, forward mids, and neutral treble. Love high detailed and clear sound.
*All critical listening is done using a Chord Mojo*
64 Audio is a great family run company with a rich history. 64 Audio is unsurprisingly named after the year 1964, “a pinnacle year for Rock music”, after which “music going forward would never be the same”. 64 Audio writes that “everything about that special year (1964) was life changing, and it left an indelible mark on everyone who lived it or later learned of it. 64 Audio’s sole focus is making that same mark when it comes to personal audio”. And after hearing the U18 and the Fourté, I think 64 is on track and accomplishing their “sole focus”. I personally think 64 Audio is somewhat overlooked in the audiophile world today, and I do believe they deserve much more attention. While I was not head over-heels crazy for their current U-Series (which is supposedly going to get a “makeover” soon), the U18 and the Fourté blew me away at CanJam SoCal. So much so that I quickly got myself one of each to review. My Fourté review can be found here: (link will be added when Fourté review goes live). This is my review of the 64 Audio U18 Tzar.
———————————————————————————————————————————————————————
This unit was not provided to me for free, and I had purchased the unit. In every review I write, I put forth my completely honest and non-biased opinion. If I do not like something, I will say so in plain english.
That being said, I would like to thank Lisa, Bogdan, Chris, Roman, and Vlad at 64 Audio for putting up with my incessant questions/nagging, and for helping me afford this unit.
Manufacturer Website: 64 Audio
———————————————————————————————————————————————————————
The U18 Tzar is the world’s first 18 driver IEM. Yes, you read that correctly, 18 drivers per side, which means 36 drivers total. While more drivers does not always equate to a better IEM, it is unquestionable that you can hear the difference between any other multi-driver IEM and the U18 Tzar in terms of detail (which I will elaborate upon later). The U18t has 8 low BAs, 8 mid BAs, 1 mid-high BA, and 1 tia high driver. For those of you not familiar with the tia driver, it is a patented tubeless driver from 64 Audio. Essentially, the tia driver on the U18 pumps sound into a chamber located in the nozzle of the IEM, which is then released along with the rest of the sound, into your ear. The best example I can give is that your living room is the shell of the IEM, and the tia drivers are like the specifically placed speakers in the living room. The tia driver produces incredibly smooth, open, extended, and airy highs. It is almost impossible to put into words the difference between the sound of a tia driver and a regular BA driver, but there is zero question in my mind that the tia driver will play a major role in the future of the IEM industry. The U18’s housing is made of aluminum and the faceplate is made of acid-burned copper. While there are varying opinions of the look of the U18, I find it is pretty gorgeous. But looks of course do not affect the sound of the IEM.
ACCESSORIES AND PACKAGING
Packaging is big. With minimal accessories, 64 does not give you too much. The accessories provided are just enough. 3 sets of Isolation Comply Memory Foam Tips of different sizes are included along with 3 more sets of different sized silicon tips. A product manual and a warranty card are included along with the headphones of course. The best part of the accessories is the 64 Audio case. It is small enough to fit in your pocket, and is amazingly designed. With a cable wrap, and specific little cubbies to but the IEMs themselves, the case is sure to protect your investment. Equipped with a small packet of silica gel in the case, your IEMs will not be damaged by moisture. The case also holds a classic cleaning tool, a shirt clip, and a storage spot for 2 sets of Apex modules. The U18 also comes with both sets of Apex modules: the M15 and M20.
SOUND
*Quick Note: 64 Audio tunes the U18 Tzar using Comply T-500 isolation tips. Thusly, to hear the U18 at their best, you should have the Comply tips on. With silicon tips, the U18 sounds super bright, and not as enjoyable as when Comply tips are on them.*
Wow. Just wow. The entire frequency range sounds realistic. The sound quality of these IEMs are so good that I actually really do feel as if I am at a personal concert, with the artist singing directly to me. The entire signature is pretty flat, with no one frequency range really being emphasized.
Bass: Bass on these IEMs is incredible. Which is good, because with 8 BA’s pumping out the bass, you would expect nothing less. Bass is super textured and detailed all throughout the bass range. There is a fantastically textured sub-bass rumble, coupled with the well textured mid and upper bass range. As I listen to these IEMs, I hear new details in the bass lines of my music that are not clearly audible on other TOTL IEMs. Because the bass is so clean, textured and detailed throughout the entire frequency range, male vocals and lower background vocal harmonies are incredible. The kick drum thump is actually textured and distinguishable in music, which is super incredible. Bass on these IEMs is neutral, and, for my taste, I am left wanting a bit more. However, after a “brain burn-in”, the bass is at the perfect level. When needed, the bass is present and clear and textured, but it does not overshadow the highs or mids.
Mids: Vocals are a clear focal point on the U18. Both male and female vocals are very clear, textured, and scarily realistic. I feel as if I am being serenaded by Sinatra, and receiving my own personal concert from Michael Bublé. The emphasis on vocals is due to the lower and middle-mids being forward, but much like with the bass, lower and middle-mids do not overpower the rest of the mids or highs. The best example of how clean and textured the mids are on the U18 are the horn lines. Trumpet is so realistic, with a ton of texture. I feel as if I am in a room surrounded by horns. Because of this level of texture and realism, upper female vocals are also super realistic.
Treble: Tia is the future of IEMs. There is zero question in my mind of this fact. In an 18 driver IEM with only 1 high driver, one might expect the highs to be recessed, muddy, and to lack detail. This could not be farther from the truth. Highs on this IEM are most detailed, textured, and realistic sounding I have ever heard. The tia driver sits in the nozzle, meaning it delivers highs directly into your ear. This is part of the reason why the highs are not overshadowed, but in fact, somehow perfectly balanced in the signature (when using Comply tips to which the U18 was tuned). One can rarely talk about truly textured highs, but in the U18, no one can deny the level of texture of the highs. The crash and sizzle of the cymbals is clear and textured. You can hear the vibrato of the sizzle of the cymbals, something I have never heard this clearly on any other IEM. Shakers are easily distinguishable and the snare is gorgeous. You can hear the vibrato and the different frequencies of the triangle. Of course there is zero sibilance. Reading and hearing about the U18 Tzar, I was skeptical about the decision to have only 1 driver out of 18 strictly dedicated to highs (there is a mid-high driver in addition to the tia high), but all my skepticism was quickly quieted after listening for about 30 seconds.
I am beyond impressed with the U18’s sound. The signature is essentially flat throughout the entire spectrum, and yet each instrument is easily picked out. Although non-fatiguing, the U18 is still super energetic, and feels almost as if everything is forward. Each frequency range shines, and each instrument is given the opportunity to shine. I will say it again: tia is the future of IEMs. That being said, I am glad the tia high was included in the U18 Tzar.
DETAIL
There is a major debate in the audiophile community: “does more drivers equate to a better IEM?”. In my general experience, more drivers generally means better IEM, but there are of course exceptions (such as most of Ken’s Campfire Audio lineup, and a few others). There is zero question that the 18 driver U18 has the most detail of any IEM I have ever heard. It is the 18 drivers that equate to that level of detail, even though the U18 is only a four-way crossover. Because the U18 is a four-way crossover IEM, it allows many drivers to be producing sound for the same frequency range, meaning that there is a ton of detail. As I said previously, I am hearing new aspects of my music in the bass range. The background vocals (which mainly fall into the lower-mid range) are the most detailed I have ever heard. Highs are textured and super detailed. Also keep in mind that in addition to the entire frequency range being incredibly detailed, it is also incredibly textured. I am not missing any detail, nor any texture. Instrumental separation is something else. I have never ever heard separation to this level. Every single detail, instrument, or even really subtle hand tapping comes out clearly and distinguishably. Again, it is the 18 drivers of the U18 that really make it possible to accomplish this level of separation, which is the argument for more drivers.
SOUNDSTAGE
The soundstage on the U18 is very interesting. It is incredibly long and wide, and above average for height. It is the combination of instrumental separation and soundstage that play heavily into the U18 sounding so realistic. Of course, soundstage will be elaborated upon during comparisons.
ISOLATION, COMFORT, AND FIT
Isolation on the U18 is actually really good, which is surprising due to the APEX system installed, which essentially gives the IEM a more natural, open, and bigger sound by releasing pressure from the IEM. When music is playing, no sounds get through, and I am only left with my thoughts and music, which is the way it should be. The U18 is very light, and surprisingly compact for an IEM with 18 drivers in it. Additionally, the I have no problems with the fit, as the U18 fits comfortably into the ear and sits nicely. With some IEMs, I can adjust the fit and get a different sound due to ill fit. I can not do this on the U18. Because of how light and how well the U18 really fits, I have no comfort issues with the U18, and can enjoy long listening sessions. The only potential issue I have come across is their premium cable. Depending on how the IEMs are worn, the braided portion of the cable can rub against your skin, irritating the area of contact.
COMPARISONS
Vs Noble Audio Katana
Instantly you can tell the sound quality on the Katana is much worse than that of the U18. The U18 has much more textured mids, highs, and vocals. The U18 also is much better detailed than the Katana. The U18 is much more neutral and sounds more natural. The soundstage on the Katana is wider and longer than that of the U18. We come to the question about price: with the U18 priced $1000 USD higher than the Katana, is it worth the extra cash? Undoubtedly. In my opinion, the U18 makes a mockery of the Katana. The Katana is a worth opponent to the U18, but it just does not compare in terms of sound quality or detail. The only place it has a leg up on the U18 is soundstage. Fit is better on the U18 as well. It’s actually quite shocking how much clearer the U18 is when directly compared to the Katana. The Katana does have a bit more sub bass rumble than the U18, and is for sure considered colored when compared to the U18.
Vs Campfire Audio Andromeda
I have chosen to compare these 2 IEMs as they are both praised for their highs due to their technology. With the Andromeda in my ear now, I can tell sound quality is much worse than that of the U18 in almost ever aspect. The highs are comparable, but in the end, it is very clear that the highs from the tia driver in the U18 are much clearer, more textured, and better than that of the Andromeda. As for the rest of the frequency range, there is no competition: the U18 destroys the Andromeda. Where this comparison gets tricky is in pricing. The U18 comes in at $2999 USD, while the Andromeda comes in at $1099 USD. Is the U18 worth $1900 USD more? In my opinion, it undoubtedly is. I do have to give major props to Ken at Campfire for creating such an amazing IEM as such a great price though. While the Andromeda is by no means a bad IEM, it is just outdone in every way by the U18. I am yet to write my review of the Andromeda, but it will undoubtedly be very positive, as I really do like the Andromeda. The fact that I so strongly prefer the U18 over the Andromeda shows how amazing the U18 is. In terms of detail, the U18 kills the Andromeda. I can sit here for another 20 minutes writing about how the two compare, but instead I’ll just say this: if you think of a category and want to compare the two, in every category but price, the U18 is better.
Vs 64 Audio Tia Fourté
Right off the bat, you can notice a major shape difference between the two. The U18’s body fits into the curvature of your ear, while the Fourté does not fit as tightly. The Fourté has a thicker body, surprising, as it also has 14 less drivers than the U18. The nozzle on the Fourté is longer as well. The sound quality on the Fourté is not quite as good as the U18. The Fourté is not as neutral as the U18, being a bit darker. With there being more bass on the Fourté, it is clear the U18 is the less colored of the two. With both having the tia high driver, highs are incredibly on both. Instrumental separation and detail on the U18 is better, however, the soundstage of the Fourté is incredibly large, and sounds almost like full surround sound speakers do. I am lacking that full surround sound on the U18, but I have never heard it quite like I am on the Fourté. I attribute this full soundstage to the 4 tia drivers that pump out the music of the Fourté. The vocals are clearer/more realistic on the U18. Overall the Fourté is a more musical choice, while the U18 is a neutral analytical choice. While I did put money up for both units, I will not be selling either one. I can’t pick a favorite; they are just so different from each other. Honestly, you have to pick for yourself. As always, try to hear before you purchase.
SUMMARY
While many can’t validate spending this kind of money for an IEM, I believe 64 Audio’s asking price is pretty fair. I would love to see 64 Audio produce a U18 in a cheaper housing, and selling it for cheaper for an alternative look (and briefly talked to Chris about this at CanJam). With almost every aspect of these IEMs being perfect, I had to get super nit picky in terms of finding something negative about the U18. If you are looking for an end of game IEM, the U18 might be the answer to your search.
*All critical listening is done using a Chord Mojo*
64 Audio is a great family run company with a rich history. 64 Audio is unsurprisingly named after the year 1964, “a pinnacle year for Rock music”, after which “music going forward would never be the same”. 64 Audio writes that “everything about that special year (1964) was life changing, and it left an indelible mark on everyone who lived it or later learned of it. 64 Audio’s sole focus is making that same mark when it comes to personal audio”. And after hearing the U18 and the Fourté, I think 64 is on track and accomplishing their “sole focus”. I personally think 64 Audio is somewhat overlooked in the audiophile world today, and I do believe they deserve much more attention. While I was not head over-heels crazy for their current U-Series (which is supposedly going to get a “makeover” soon), the U18 and the Fourté blew me away at CanJam SoCal. So much so that I quickly got myself one of each to review. My Fourté review can be found here: (link will be added when Fourté review goes live). This is my review of the 64 Audio U18 Tzar.
———————————————————————————————————————————————————————
This unit was not provided to me for free, and I had purchased the unit. In every review I write, I put forth my completely honest and non-biased opinion. If I do not like something, I will say so in plain english.
That being said, I would like to thank Lisa, Bogdan, Chris, Roman, and Vlad at 64 Audio for putting up with my incessant questions/nagging, and for helping me afford this unit.
Manufacturer Website: 64 Audio
———————————————————————————————————————————————————————
The U18 Tzar is the world’s first 18 driver IEM. Yes, you read that correctly, 18 drivers per side, which means 36 drivers total. While more drivers does not always equate to a better IEM, it is unquestionable that you can hear the difference between any other multi-driver IEM and the U18 Tzar in terms of detail (which I will elaborate upon later). The U18t has 8 low BAs, 8 mid BAs, 1 mid-high BA, and 1 tia high driver. For those of you not familiar with the tia driver, it is a patented tubeless driver from 64 Audio. Essentially, the tia driver on the U18 pumps sound into a chamber located in the nozzle of the IEM, which is then released along with the rest of the sound, into your ear. The best example I can give is that your living room is the shell of the IEM, and the tia drivers are like the specifically placed speakers in the living room. The tia driver produces incredibly smooth, open, extended, and airy highs. It is almost impossible to put into words the difference between the sound of a tia driver and a regular BA driver, but there is zero question in my mind that the tia driver will play a major role in the future of the IEM industry. The U18’s housing is made of aluminum and the faceplate is made of acid-burned copper. While there are varying opinions of the look of the U18, I find it is pretty gorgeous. But looks of course do not affect the sound of the IEM.
ACCESSORIES AND PACKAGING
Packaging is big. With minimal accessories, 64 does not give you too much. The accessories provided are just enough. 3 sets of Isolation Comply Memory Foam Tips of different sizes are included along with 3 more sets of different sized silicon tips. A product manual and a warranty card are included along with the headphones of course. The best part of the accessories is the 64 Audio case. It is small enough to fit in your pocket, and is amazingly designed. With a cable wrap, and specific little cubbies to but the IEMs themselves, the case is sure to protect your investment. Equipped with a small packet of silica gel in the case, your IEMs will not be damaged by moisture. The case also holds a classic cleaning tool, a shirt clip, and a storage spot for 2 sets of Apex modules. The U18 also comes with both sets of Apex modules: the M15 and M20.
SOUND
*Quick Note: 64 Audio tunes the U18 Tzar using Comply T-500 isolation tips. Thusly, to hear the U18 at their best, you should have the Comply tips on. With silicon tips, the U18 sounds super bright, and not as enjoyable as when Comply tips are on them.*
Wow. Just wow. The entire frequency range sounds realistic. The sound quality of these IEMs are so good that I actually really do feel as if I am at a personal concert, with the artist singing directly to me. The entire signature is pretty flat, with no one frequency range really being emphasized.
Bass: Bass on these IEMs is incredible. Which is good, because with 8 BA’s pumping out the bass, you would expect nothing less. Bass is super textured and detailed all throughout the bass range. There is a fantastically textured sub-bass rumble, coupled with the well textured mid and upper bass range. As I listen to these IEMs, I hear new details in the bass lines of my music that are not clearly audible on other TOTL IEMs. Because the bass is so clean, textured and detailed throughout the entire frequency range, male vocals and lower background vocal harmonies are incredible. The kick drum thump is actually textured and distinguishable in music, which is super incredible. Bass on these IEMs is neutral, and, for my taste, I am left wanting a bit more. However, after a “brain burn-in”, the bass is at the perfect level. When needed, the bass is present and clear and textured, but it does not overshadow the highs or mids.
Mids: Vocals are a clear focal point on the U18. Both male and female vocals are very clear, textured, and scarily realistic. I feel as if I am being serenaded by Sinatra, and receiving my own personal concert from Michael Bublé. The emphasis on vocals is due to the lower and middle-mids being forward, but much like with the bass, lower and middle-mids do not overpower the rest of the mids or highs. The best example of how clean and textured the mids are on the U18 are the horn lines. Trumpet is so realistic, with a ton of texture. I feel as if I am in a room surrounded by horns. Because of this level of texture and realism, upper female vocals are also super realistic.
Treble: Tia is the future of IEMs. There is zero question in my mind of this fact. In an 18 driver IEM with only 1 high driver, one might expect the highs to be recessed, muddy, and to lack detail. This could not be farther from the truth. Highs on this IEM are most detailed, textured, and realistic sounding I have ever heard. The tia driver sits in the nozzle, meaning it delivers highs directly into your ear. This is part of the reason why the highs are not overshadowed, but in fact, somehow perfectly balanced in the signature (when using Comply tips to which the U18 was tuned). One can rarely talk about truly textured highs, but in the U18, no one can deny the level of texture of the highs. The crash and sizzle of the cymbals is clear and textured. You can hear the vibrato of the sizzle of the cymbals, something I have never heard this clearly on any other IEM. Shakers are easily distinguishable and the snare is gorgeous. You can hear the vibrato and the different frequencies of the triangle. Of course there is zero sibilance. Reading and hearing about the U18 Tzar, I was skeptical about the decision to have only 1 driver out of 18 strictly dedicated to highs (there is a mid-high driver in addition to the tia high), but all my skepticism was quickly quieted after listening for about 30 seconds.
I am beyond impressed with the U18’s sound. The signature is essentially flat throughout the entire spectrum, and yet each instrument is easily picked out. Although non-fatiguing, the U18 is still super energetic, and feels almost as if everything is forward. Each frequency range shines, and each instrument is given the opportunity to shine. I will say it again: tia is the future of IEMs. That being said, I am glad the tia high was included in the U18 Tzar.
DETAIL
There is a major debate in the audiophile community: “does more drivers equate to a better IEM?”. In my general experience, more drivers generally means better IEM, but there are of course exceptions (such as most of Ken’s Campfire Audio lineup, and a few others). There is zero question that the 18 driver U18 has the most detail of any IEM I have ever heard. It is the 18 drivers that equate to that level of detail, even though the U18 is only a four-way crossover. Because the U18 is a four-way crossover IEM, it allows many drivers to be producing sound for the same frequency range, meaning that there is a ton of detail. As I said previously, I am hearing new aspects of my music in the bass range. The background vocals (which mainly fall into the lower-mid range) are the most detailed I have ever heard. Highs are textured and super detailed. Also keep in mind that in addition to the entire frequency range being incredibly detailed, it is also incredibly textured. I am not missing any detail, nor any texture. Instrumental separation is something else. I have never ever heard separation to this level. Every single detail, instrument, or even really subtle hand tapping comes out clearly and distinguishably. Again, it is the 18 drivers of the U18 that really make it possible to accomplish this level of separation, which is the argument for more drivers.
SOUNDSTAGE
The soundstage on the U18 is very interesting. It is incredibly long and wide, and above average for height. It is the combination of instrumental separation and soundstage that play heavily into the U18 sounding so realistic. Of course, soundstage will be elaborated upon during comparisons.
ISOLATION, COMFORT, AND FIT
Isolation on the U18 is actually really good, which is surprising due to the APEX system installed, which essentially gives the IEM a more natural, open, and bigger sound by releasing pressure from the IEM. When music is playing, no sounds get through, and I am only left with my thoughts and music, which is the way it should be. The U18 is very light, and surprisingly compact for an IEM with 18 drivers in it. Additionally, the I have no problems with the fit, as the U18 fits comfortably into the ear and sits nicely. With some IEMs, I can adjust the fit and get a different sound due to ill fit. I can not do this on the U18. Because of how light and how well the U18 really fits, I have no comfort issues with the U18, and can enjoy long listening sessions. The only potential issue I have come across is their premium cable. Depending on how the IEMs are worn, the braided portion of the cable can rub against your skin, irritating the area of contact.
COMPARISONS
Vs Noble Audio Katana
Instantly you can tell the sound quality on the Katana is much worse than that of the U18. The U18 has much more textured mids, highs, and vocals. The U18 also is much better detailed than the Katana. The U18 is much more neutral and sounds more natural. The soundstage on the Katana is wider and longer than that of the U18. We come to the question about price: with the U18 priced $1000 USD higher than the Katana, is it worth the extra cash? Undoubtedly. In my opinion, the U18 makes a mockery of the Katana. The Katana is a worth opponent to the U18, but it just does not compare in terms of sound quality or detail. The only place it has a leg up on the U18 is soundstage. Fit is better on the U18 as well. It’s actually quite shocking how much clearer the U18 is when directly compared to the Katana. The Katana does have a bit more sub bass rumble than the U18, and is for sure considered colored when compared to the U18.
Vs Campfire Audio Andromeda
I have chosen to compare these 2 IEMs as they are both praised for their highs due to their technology. With the Andromeda in my ear now, I can tell sound quality is much worse than that of the U18 in almost ever aspect. The highs are comparable, but in the end, it is very clear that the highs from the tia driver in the U18 are much clearer, more textured, and better than that of the Andromeda. As for the rest of the frequency range, there is no competition: the U18 destroys the Andromeda. Where this comparison gets tricky is in pricing. The U18 comes in at $2999 USD, while the Andromeda comes in at $1099 USD. Is the U18 worth $1900 USD more? In my opinion, it undoubtedly is. I do have to give major props to Ken at Campfire for creating such an amazing IEM as such a great price though. While the Andromeda is by no means a bad IEM, it is just outdone in every way by the U18. I am yet to write my review of the Andromeda, but it will undoubtedly be very positive, as I really do like the Andromeda. The fact that I so strongly prefer the U18 over the Andromeda shows how amazing the U18 is. In terms of detail, the U18 kills the Andromeda. I can sit here for another 20 minutes writing about how the two compare, but instead I’ll just say this: if you think of a category and want to compare the two, in every category but price, the U18 is better.
Vs 64 Audio Tia Fourté
Right off the bat, you can notice a major shape difference between the two. The U18’s body fits into the curvature of your ear, while the Fourté does not fit as tightly. The Fourté has a thicker body, surprising, as it also has 14 less drivers than the U18. The nozzle on the Fourté is longer as well. The sound quality on the Fourté is not quite as good as the U18. The Fourté is not as neutral as the U18, being a bit darker. With there being more bass on the Fourté, it is clear the U18 is the less colored of the two. With both having the tia high driver, highs are incredibly on both. Instrumental separation and detail on the U18 is better, however, the soundstage of the Fourté is incredibly large, and sounds almost like full surround sound speakers do. I am lacking that full surround sound on the U18, but I have never heard it quite like I am on the Fourté. I attribute this full soundstage to the 4 tia drivers that pump out the music of the Fourté. The vocals are clearer/more realistic on the U18. Overall the Fourté is a more musical choice, while the U18 is a neutral analytical choice. While I did put money up for both units, I will not be selling either one. I can’t pick a favorite; they are just so different from each other. Honestly, you have to pick for yourself. As always, try to hear before you purchase.
SUMMARY
While many can’t validate spending this kind of money for an IEM, I believe 64 Audio’s asking price is pretty fair. I would love to see 64 Audio produce a U18 in a cheaper housing, and selling it for cheaper for an alternative look (and briefly talked to Chris about this at CanJam). With almost every aspect of these IEMs being perfect, I had to get super nit picky in terms of finding something negative about the U18. If you are looking for an end of game IEM, the U18 might be the answer to your search.