Reviews by jeremy205100

jeremy205100

100+ Head-Fier
Pros: Bass (if you're a basshead), Comfort, Both Wired and Wireless Cables Included
Cons: Bass (if you're not a basshead), Mids, Price
Disclaimers:
1) This product was provided to me by Westone as a review sample at no cost. There is no incentive for a positive rating and this review expresses my honest opinion of the product.
2) Audio is a very subjective hobby, and my opinions might not accurately reflect your preferences and experiences. So please keep this in mind when reading my review.

I welcome any feedback and questions.

Introduction
Westone is one of the oldest manufacturers of in ear monitors (IEMs) in the industry. If you're not very familiar with them, they have a rich history which consists of many firsts. In 1990, they produced the first custom-fit IEM with a balanced armature driver. In 1996, working with Jerry Harvey, they produced the first dual-driver balanced armature custom IEM. They have been making universal-fit IEMs for decades as well. They claim to be the largest manufacturer of custom-fit earpieces in the world, which is probably true, considering they make earpieces for hearing protection and the military in addition to just IEMs for musicians and audiophiles. They are headquartered in Colorado. You can read more about the company here. Today, they offer an extensive lineup of many universal and custom IEMs.

This review is for the B50 ($699.99), a universal-fit five-driver balanced armature IEM. Westone designed the B50 for "the music lover who just can’t get enough low-end. By combining our largest low-end balanced-armature driver, with two mid-range, and two high-frequency drivers the B50 creates a sound that is totally immersive, with sonic detail and clarity that has to be heard to be believed." The B50 is the more expensive sibling of the three-driver B30 ($449.99). Together, these two IEMs form Westone's new B series, which is specifically tuned for those who enjoy a low end that is far above neutral. The B series is an offshoot of Westone's regular audiophile lineup, the W series. More specifically, the B50 and B30 are each a new version of the older W50 and W30, respectively, which appear to have been discontinued. Westone told me that while the basic driver packages are similar in design to the outgoing older W50 and W30, the crossovers and acoustic couplers have been completely redesigned. As the B50 is not designed for serious studio work or those who want a more neutral sound, I am not going to penalize it for this in my review. I personally enjoy a bass-heavy signature, so keep that in mind when reading this review.

For this review, I used my iPhone 6 as a source and music ranging from 320kbps Spotify to lossless. I own higher end desktop sources, but believe that IEMs should be able to be driven well from a smartphone, as they are designed for on-the-go use. While the B50 might sound slightly better with more expensive equipment, I believe that at its price point most customers will be using it with just a smartphone. As such, they are relatively easy to drive at 35Ω, and I had no issues using them with my iPhone. With both included cables I usually had my iPhone set to just under halfway for volume. As I previously mentioned, the B50 is five balanced armature driver design with a three-way passive crossover. Westone specifies the frequency response as 10 Hz – 20 kHz, the sensitivity as 118 dB SPL at 1 mW and passive noise attenuation (isolation) at 25 dB. Rounding out the specs is a 24-month warranty, which is normal at this price point. You can read Westone's spec sheet for the B50 here.

The best place to buy the B50, or any other Westone IEM, is probably from Westone's own website. The links above will take you to it.

Design and Accessories – 19/20
The packaging of the B50 is elegant and nice enough to be presented as a gift without going overboard. The front of the large box has an enlarged picture of the B50, with an equalizer band below it. Five of the equalizer bands are colored orange to represent the five drivers in each B50 earpiece. The other sides of the box have information about Westone and the B50 itself. The top 90% of the box comes off, revealing a pull flap. Under this is the B50 along with the carrying case, which contains all the other included accessories.

The design of the B50 is a bit bland, but very functional. The oval-shaped earpieces themselves are made of a hard plastic with nozzles that are a bit narrower than most other IEMs I have used. The nozzles have a six-character serial number printed onto them. A metal face plate sits on the end of the earpiece opposite the nozzle. These faceplates can be swapped out using an included tiny screwdriver; black comes preinstalled but orange ones are also included. The faceplates wrap around the earpiece, with an R or L on the inside to indicate the channel and bold B50 text on the outside. I initially swapped out the black for the orange on only the right side, to make it easier to distinguish the two channels when putting the earphones in my ears. But I soon found the large letter on the faceplate to be more than sufficient to tell them apart, so I switched the left earpiece over to the orange as well. While the B50 isn't going to win any fashion contests, I found the orange faceplates to be more stylish and vibrant. The last notable feature on the housings are the MMCX connectors that allow for the cable to be changed, either between the included 3.5mm or Bluetooth cables or a third-party option. Westone told me that the B50's MMCX connectors are durable enough to support frequent replacement of the cable, say if you wanted to switch back and forth between Bluetooth or 3.5mm several times a week for different uses. MMCX and two-pin connectors are the two most popular connectors for IEM cables. Personally, I prefer two-pin, as the earpiece can rotate around on the MMCX pin, which can make it harder to tell which channel is which when taking them out of the case. But that is a minor issue.

As previously mentioned, the B50 includes both a 3.5mm cable and a Bluetooth cable. The 3.5mm cable is Westone's High-Definition Silver MMCX Audio Cable ($124.99). This is a premium cable and is a step above the regular cable included with lesser earphones. According to Westone, this cable "features four multi-strands of ultra-low resistance pure silver-plated copper tensile wire which improves electrical conductivity and is reinforced with a special aramid-fiber strengthening core. This lightweight cable also uses a smooth low-durometer outer sleeve that is specially designed to keep cable noise to a bare minimum, and remain soft and flexible even through the most rugged use ... The smooth-jacketed, ultra-low resistance High-Definition Silver Cable from Westone, improves electrical conductivity, provides extraordinary detail and clarity, with enhanced sound reproduction, making it the perfect match for our entire line of universal-fit earphones and custom-fit in-ear monitors."

Each side of the cable starts with the MMCX connector with a translucent covering over it for strain relief. At the top of the strain relief covering, over the connector, is a thin colored ring to mark the channel; red for the right and blue for the left. While important for connecting it to the proper earpiece, I found the big lettering on the earpiece faceplates to be much more practical for telling the sides apart in day-to-day use. The strain reliefs give way to transparent earguides that extend about two inches down the cable. There is no memory wire under the earguides, which is a shame, as I do find cables with memory wires stay over the ear a bit better than those without. I am taking off half a point for this lack of memory wire, as the cable infrequently had to be adjusted to stay over my ear when I was walking or moving my head a lot. This wasn't a major issue, but is something that shouldn't happen to begin with. After the earguides, each channel has a thin braided strand of two wires that meet at the translucent two-piece cable splitter after about a foot. There is no in-line remote control and microphone, which I think is acceptable since this is a premium cable designed for the best sound quality possible, and the included Bluetooth cable does include a remote and microphone. The cable splitter is sturdy and features a clear W Westone logo on it. I found the cinch of the splitter to work well for helping the B50 stay put and minimize cable noise. After the splitter, the two channel cables aren't joined together, but rather continue in separate but connected plastic coverings until they reach the translucent 3.5mm connector. The connector is at a right angle and is very sturdy. Unfortunately, the right-angle connectors are very awkward to use with headphone adapter dongles on newer smartphones, so I am taking half a point off for this. This is either going to be a nonissue or big deal depending on your source device. Personally, I am not a big believer in expensive cable upgrades like some on head-fi are. But this cable features a nice combination of durability, high-end cabling and stylish design that should prevent all but the most hardcore cable enthusiasts from having to upgrade it. While I think the asking price of $124.99 when purchased separately is a bit steep, this is definitely a nice cable and it's great to see it included with the B50 over Westone's cheaper and more basic cables.

The B50 also comes with Westone's original Bluetooth Cable ($99.99) that was released in 2016. I say original, because has since came out with a Bluetooth V2 Cable ($149.99). There are a few differences between the two. The included original cable uses the older Bluetooth 4.0 standard with the CSR8645 chipset, supports aptX, has 8 hours of battery life and is IPX4 rated for sweat resistance. The V2 cable upgrades these specs to Bluetooth 5.0 with the CSR8675 chipset, supports aptX HD 8 hours of battery life with a removable battery pack that provides an additional four hours in between charges and is IPX5 rated for sweat and water resistance. Both versions of the Bluetooth cable feature a three-button remote and microphone. Additionally, both cables support the AAC codec in addition to their respective versions of aptX. This is important for iPhone owners since Apple still doesn't support aptX. The included cable lacks the voice announcer found in most modern Bluetooth audio products. Usually, this announces the device name, battery level, codec being used and volume level, and I missed having it. But this feature was not nearly as common in 2016 when this cable was released. The Bluetooth's cable's controls are a bit different than most three-button remotes, but I quickly got used to them. Instead of double and triple pressing the middle button to switch tracks, you hold down the volume up and down buttons for a second. Siri is activated by double pressing the middle button instead of holding it down. The cable recharges via micro USB, and a short cable is included. I did not use the Bluetooth cable enough to have to recharge it, but I have no reason to doubt Westone's claimed battery life. The cable's battery percentage shows up in iOS, and I received the cable at 60%. After using it for a few hours it was at 40%. You can read more about the included Bluetooth cable in the spec sheet and quick start guide.

Each side of the Bluetooth cable has a black covering over the MMCX connector for strain relief. There are no colored rings for channel identification here like in the 3.5mm cable, rather each side has a L or R embedded into the strain relief covering. It is definitely not the most visible way to identify each side, but it works fine for the switching out the cable. Any other time you can just rely on the faceplate markings. The cable has no earguides or memory wire in the ears. About four inches down on each side is a battery (left side) or remote and microphone (right side). These are each about an inch and a half long. The cable then has a cinch that controls any excess length, which I found there to be plenty of. There are two ways to wear the cable: with the excess cable channeled in front of the body or in back. I found wearing it in back to be more comfortable and have a more secure fit, but the mic is basically unusable in this position since it is behind the neck. When I made calls in this position the caller had trouble hearing me. On the other hand, when I wore it in front, it was slightly less comfortable but callers said I sounded crystal clear. I am not taking off any points for this because it is an issue many similar Bluetooth products have and when worn in front of the body the microphone sounds great.

In terms of sound quality, I found the Bluetooth cable to be excellent. I was pleasantly surprised considering it uses Bluetooth 4.0, which dates back to 2010. Some may find it to be a bit less detailed than the 3.5mm cable, but I am hesitant to criticize it for this because I was only able to use the AAC codec, and not the higher-resolution aptX. Regardless, even with AAC I found the cable to sound at least 80-90% as good as the 3.5mm cable. If your source supports aptX it'll sound even better. The connection strength is very good. Very occasionally, perhaps a few times every half hour, the sound cut out for less than a second. So, the connection isn't perfect, but it's more than usable. Just like with the included 3.5mm cable, I think the asking price of the Bluetooth cable when purchased separately is a bit steep, given that it uses a dated version of Bluetooth and lacks a voice announcer. But there are very few other companies that I am aware of that include both a 3.5mm and Bluetooth cable in the box (Audeze comes to mind with its latest LCD-i3). Therefore, I am very happy to see this cable included in the box with the B50. It will definitely be good enough for some customers, but if your device supports aptX HD or you plan on using the B50 exclusively with Bluetooth I would consider upgrading to the V2 cable.

The B50 includes ten pairs of tips: five are silicon (Westone calls these Star Fit) and five are foam (Westone calls these True-Fit). Each size tip comes in both silicon and foam. There are two thicknesses of shorter tips and three thicknesses of longer tips. Westone colors the part of each tip that goes over the earpiece's nozzle according to its length and thickness. For example, the thickest longer tip is colored orange. The colors are the same for each size's foam and silicon tips. This is a great idea and should make reordering tips a lot easier, as you just need to look for the color of the tips you like instead of remembering what size they are. Westone claims to have invested significant resources in developing their tips and it shows. They are definitely high quality. I would've liked to have seen some double-flanged silicon tips as well, as I have liked those on other IEMs I have tried, but I am not taking off any points for this since the B50 includes as many, if not more, tips than most other IEMs.

The last included accessory is the nylon hardshell case. It has a metal Westone logo on the bottom right of the top and a sturdy zipper around the middle. This is a pretty big case, and it can hold the B50 and all included accessories. If you use a separate audio player other than your phone, it might fit in the case if you take out some of the accessories. My iPhone 6 was just a bit too tall to fit, and most newer smartphones are even bigger. The inside of the case is lined with a luxurious feeling velvety material. There is a divider on one side of the case along with a mesh covering to hold any smaller accessories. Overall, this is a nice case and should do a great job of protecting the B50. Unfortunately, it is too big to be pocketable. I usually just put it in my messenger bag in the morning, but this didn't work if I left without taking the messenger bag. I will probably complement the included case with a smaller one for when I just want to take the B50 and need it to fit in my pocket.

If this section has seemed lengthy it's because the B50 includes more useful and valuable accessories than most other IEMs. The accessory package is so great that most customers won't need to consider cable or tip upgrades. Therefore, I am increasing the weight of this category from ten points to twenty. Since I took off half a point each for the lack of memory wire and use of a right-angle connector in the 3.5mm cable, the B50 gets nineteen points. Overall, I am very pleased with the B50's included accessories and feel that they are competitive, if not a step above, the competition.

Comfort, Fit and Isolation – 9.5/10
I have grouped these three together because I believe that for IEMs they are all intimately related. If you don’t get a good fit, the earphones are likely to be uncomfortable and not isolate well.

As discussed previously, the B50 comes with five pairs of silicon tips and five pairs of foam tips. It is vitally important that anyone using an IEM try out all the different included tips to see which works best for them. If the tip isn't sealing well you are going to get weak bass and poor noise isolation. I liked how Westone varies the length of the tip as well as the thickness. This should allow most people to get a good fit with one of the included tips. The tip material can affect the sound and I found the silicon tips allowed the B50 to sound slightly more detailed, although it wasn't a huge difference. I also found the silicon tips to be more comfortable, particularly the short pair, since it doesn't go as deep into the ear. This was the pair of tips I preferred while at home. Using the longer silicon tips made me experience discomfort after about a half hour or so. But foam tips are much better at blocking noise than silicon tips, although they do have the disadvantage of needing to be replaced more often as they get dirty and lose their shape. Westone rates the B50 for 25 dB of noise isolation, which they confirmed was with the included foam tips. I was a bit surprised by this, as it is very close to the 26 dB of noise isolation most custom IEMs are rated for. But I can confirm that the B50 has an above average amount of noise isolation when used with the longer foam tips. I used these while commuting in a noisy city and on a screeching subway and it did a great job blocking out the noise. It was almost as good as a custom IEM, but not quite there. That being said, I think the B50 with its foam tips will be better than most other universal IEMs in terms of noise isolation. When using these long foam tips, I was able to wear them for about 30-45 minutes before experiencing any discomfort, which was enough for what I needed. But if I wanted to better balance comfort and noise isolation, I would've tried the shorter foam tips.

When I said the design of the B50 was a bit bland, I also said it was very functional. And fit is an area where this comes into play. The earpiece shapes fit very well in the ear and when I used the shorter silicon tips I could wear them for hours at a time without any discomfort. Additionally, I didn't find cable noise to be an issue with either of the B50's included cables. This means that when you walk or move around with them you won't notice the sound of the cable running against your shirt. In summary, I found the many included high-quality tips combined with the ergonomic shape of the earpieces made for a very comfortable fit and great noise isolation when needed.

Soundstage – 9.25/10
The soundstage is excellent for an IEM. When listening to more complicated tracks the imaging does a great job separating the different instruments and vocals. Vocals in particular are close and up front which makes the music more intimate. I listened to some recordings on YouTube that vary the position of the recording and I was able to easily track it moving with the B50. That being said, I wouldn’t go so far to say that the soundstage compares to an open headphone or an open IEM such as Audeze’s iSINE series, but it does a great job overall and I have no complaints. The amount of detail and separation is going to depend on the quality of your recordings. I found the B50 to be a bit less forgiving than other IEMs but it really shines with high quality recordings.

Highs (Treble) – 9.25/10
The highs on the B50 are better than I expected given the bass-heavy tuning. Strings, piano notes and cymbals are all very clear, with perhaps just the slightest hint of muddying from the emphasized low end. On most songs I felt like the highs sort of got out of the way. They provide sufficient clarity and detail to let the low end shine.

Mids – 8.5/10
I have mixed feelings on the mids of the B50, and to me they were definitely the weakest part of its sound. On recordings with a significant low end there is a fair amount of bleeding from the lows into the mids that muddies the sound. I found this to be less of an issue on higher quality recordings, and even less so on acoustic recordings with less low end. On some recordings the mids were good, with clear vocals and percussion that took nothing away from my enjoyment of the music. Some purely acoustic recordings even sounded great. But on some lesser recordings vocals could be a bit muddy and piercing, and drum hits a bit shallow and thin, lacking depth. This is by no means to say that the mids are bad, as they aren't. Someone hearing an IEM in this price range for the first time will likely be amazed by the B50's. But this is an area where the B50 didn't wow me.

Lows (Bass) – 9.75/10
Simply put, if you're a basshead, you will love the B50's bass. I certainly do. It goes deep, with sub-bass being well represented. The bass as a whole is emphasized, but not out of control. Keep in mind that I prefer enhanced bass, so it's entirely possible someone else might disagree with me about it not being out of control. I found the attack to be great, almost like a dynamic driver. It has a bit of boom and rumble, but I wouldn't go so far to say it's like a subwoofer, but it's getting there. It hits far harder than most balanced armature IEMs do. The accuracy is good in the sense that different bass frequencies can be distinguished, but B50 unashamedly doesn't claim to represent the recording as the artist intended, with its emphasized bass. If I had to nitpick, I'd say the decay is a bit faster than I would have liked.

Value – 9/10
I think the B50 is a fair value at its current price, given its sound quality and extensive accessory package. The sound combines the best sound characteristics of a balanced armature design with emphasized bass. And if that's what you're looking for I think the B50 is competitive at its price point, and might even be able to be an end-game IEM, if you don't want to spend a lot more money in the future. The beauty of the accessory package is that most customers will find it adequate and won't have to spent another cent on the B50. In the box you get a premium cable to use it wired, and an adequate (although not state of the art) Bluetooth cable in case you want to go wireless. To top it off, the hardshell case can safely hold everything that comes in the box.

That being said, I would be remiss to not point out that the B50 costs $699.99. While this might not seem like a lot in a market where some flagship IEMs are now going for $3,000+, it is far from an impulse purchase. Most consumers would consider $300 to be expensive for an audio product, and the B50 is going to be out of reach for these people. But I do think Westone priced the B50 perfectly, given the market. Any higher, and I'd probably recommend people look at a custom IEM. On the other hand, if the price falls in the future the B50 could become a much better value.

Selected Comparison
Jerry Harvey JH 11 Pro ($999.99)
– The JH 11 Pro is a four-driver configuration with dual low, a single mid and a single high driver. I am going to preface this comparison by saying it's pretty unfair to the B50. My JH 11s are customs, but the added cost of them being custom is probably canceled out by the B50's much better accessory package. The JH 11 comes with only one barebones cable, which although adequate, isn't as nice as the B50's. There is no Bluetooth cable included. So assuming the B50's accessory package cancels out the extra cost of the JH 11s being custom fit, there is a $300 price difference between the two (and this doesn't include the cost of getting ear impressions made), so the JH 11s cost 42% more. But I'm going to compare them anyway, since the JH 11s are the nicest IEMs I have, and I think they have a similar sound signature to the B50.

As you'd probably expect given the price difference, I like the sound of the JH 11 more, as it combines a similarly powerful bass response with better clarity in the mids and highs. To put it more simply, while the B50 sounds great to me on most songs, the JH 11 sounds great on almost all songs, no matter the genre. So, I'd say the JH 11 Pro builds on the few sonic flaws the B50 has. The custom fit also makes it unfair to compare the bass between the two, as a good custom fit will give the best possible seal and bass response. The JH 11 also has slightly better noise isolation than the B50, as it perfectly fills a large part of the ear. Although I had no complaints with the B50's comfort, the JH 11s are more comfortable, as would be expected with something custom designed for the user's ear. In summary, while I'd definitely choose the custom JH 11s over the B50, the large price difference makes it an unfair comparison. I was impressed by the B50's ability to somewhat hold its own against the JH 11.

Conclusion – 9.28/10
I will start this conclusion by saying that if you are looking for a neutral sound signature, or an IEM to use for professional music applications, stay far away from the B50. You will hate its colored sound. That being said, I think Westone did a great job with the B50. It really shined with hip-hop, rap and EDM music, as would be expected for an IEM with great bass. It was also able to hold its own on many acoustic recordings. Although it is not perfect, I only had a few criticisms and most were minor. It combines an audiophile-quality sound (although tuned for bass-lovers) with a great accessory package. If you're a basshead looking for an IEM in this price range, I strongly suggest you check out the B50.

Averaging out the scores for all seven categories results in a score of 9.28/10. This is slightly above 4.5 stars, which is the rating I am going to show on this review. However, you can change the weighting of the various categories to better reflect your own preferences and come up with your own rating.

Attachments

  • Box Front.jpg
    Box Front.jpg
    486.8 KB · Views: 0
  • Box Back.jpg
    Box Back.jpg
    530.7 KB · Views: 0
  • Box Left.jpg
    Box Left.jpg
    380.5 KB · Views: 0
  • Box Right.jpg
    Box Right.jpg
    356.6 KB · Views: 0
  • Inside Box.jpg
    Inside Box.jpg
    428.4 KB · Views: 0
  • Box Contents.jpg
    Box Contents.jpg
    657.5 KB · Views: 0
  • Box Contents Zoomed.jpg
    Box Contents Zoomed.jpg
    639.9 KB · Views: 0
  • B50 in Box.jpg
    B50 in Box.jpg
    486.8 KB · Views: 0
  • Case in Box.jpg
    Case in Box.jpg
    547.1 KB · Views: 0
  • Case.jpg
    Case.jpg
    603.3 KB · Views: 0
  • Case Contents.jpg
    Case Contents.jpg
    677.3 KB · Views: 0
  • Tips.jpg
    Tips.jpg
    428.1 KB · Views: 0
  • Bluetooth Cable Zoomed.jpg
    Bluetooth Cable Zoomed.jpg
    359.3 KB · Views: 0
  • Bluetooth Cable.jpg
    Bluetooth Cable.jpg
    475.7 KB · Views: 0
  • Orange Faceplates.jpg
    Orange Faceplates.jpg
    403.9 KB · Views: 0
  • Documentation.jpg
    Documentation.jpg
    354.1 KB · Views: 0
  • B50.jpg
    B50.jpg
    713.4 KB · Views: 0
  • B50 with Cable.jpg
    B50 with Cable.jpg
    595.9 KB · Views: 0
  • Cable.jpg
    Cable.jpg
    762.1 KB · Views: 0
Tiax
Tiax
I'd recommend to try Spinfit CP800, they really help to open up mids and highs, and make these not so dark.

jeremy205100

100+ Head-Fier
Pros: Sound, ANC, passive noise isolation, Bluetooth connection, design
Cons: Earpads can get sweaty, build quality could be better
Disclaimers:
1) This product was provided to me as a loaner unit by Beyerdynamic at no cost. I had to return the review unit to them at the end of the review period. There is no incentive for a positive rating and this review expresses my honest opinion of the product.
2) Audio is a very subjective hobby, and my opinions might not accurately reflect your preferences and experiences. So please keep this in mind when reading my review.
3) This is my first review of a product with Bluetooth and active noise cancelling, so the format will differ slightly from my previous reviews.

I welcome any feedback and questions.

Introduction
Beyerdynamic is a German audio company based in Heilbronn. They are known for creating the first serial-produced headphone with dynamic drivers, the DT 48, in 1948. Today they remain best-known for their full-size headphones with dynamic drivers, although they have also expanded their product range to include IEMs, Bluetooth products and microphones, among others. The Lagoon ANC (hereafter referred to as the Lagoon) is Beyerdynamic’s first headphone to feature active noise cancelling (ANC). My ratings reflect the Lagoon’s current retail price of $399. The product page for the Lagoon contains a download link for a detailed spec sheet, so I will not repeat them here in detail. The Lagoon also has an app that allows for equalization and the creation of personal sound profiles. Due to the limited time I had the headphones I did not get a chance to try out the app.

In order to understand this review, and the Lagoon itself, it is important to understand the difference between passive and active noise cancelling. Passive noise cancelling, which all (except open) headphones have, blocks outside noise using the barrier the headphones create on your ears, without requiring any power. Active noise cancelling, on the other hand, uses microphones to monitor background noise and then counter it by producing inverse sound frequencies to cancel it out. ANC works best at cancelling out lower frequencies, such as the hum of a plane engine, which is why it first gained popularity among frequent travelers. Nowadays it has become much more common and many brands have created headphones featuring it.

For this review, I used my iPhone 6 as a source (both wired and over Bluetooth) and music ranging from 320kbps Spotify to lossless. I own higher end desktop sources, but given that the Lagoon is geared toward portability and use on the go, I limited this review to just my iPhone as a source. While the Lagoon might sound slightly better in wired mode with more expensive equipment, I believe the vast majority of customers will be using it with just a smartphone. As such, they are relatively easy to drive at 20Ω. Beyerdynamic specifies the frequency response as 10 Hz – 30 KHz, and the sensitivity as 91 dB at 1 mW. The battery life is advertised as 25 hours with both Bluetooth and ANC on. Using it wired or without ANC allows it to be used longer on a charge. I can’t comment on the claimed battery life other than to say that in my weeks of testing I used it several hours a week and never had to recharge it. So I would say the claimed battery life is accurate. Rounding out the specs is a 24-month warranty, which is competitive for a flagship ANC headphone.

At the time of this review, the Lagoon is readily available from many online retailers, including directly from Beyerdynamic via the product page I linked to in the first paragraph of this section.

Design and Accessories – 8.5/10
The packaging is efficient, with an outer layer containing an inner layer with a flip open cover. Inside is the Lagoon inside its hard-shell case, a 3.5mm to 3.5mm cable for using the Lagoon wired, a USB-A to USB-C cable for charging and paper documentation. I didn’t feel like there was anything missing in the included accessories.

The case is black with orange accents on the zippers and a protruding gray string that buttons onto the case. This could be useful for attaching the case to a backpack or some other loop. The case was durable and should do protect the Lagoon well. In order to fit into the flat case, the earcups rotate 90°. There is ample room to fit both the charging and 3.5mm cable inside the case as well.

The design of the Lagoon is great. It is sleek and very lightweight for a full-size headphone with a modern and clean design. I would have no issues being seen wearing them in public. The workmanship of the Lagoon is average, and clearly reflects the consumer nature of the product. Compared to my other Beyerdynamic headphones (which can be seen in my head-fi profile) which are all Made in Germany, the Lagoon is made in Asia. Additionally, the other headphones I have use a spring steel headband, while the Lagoon makes due with a plastic one. Compared to the other Beyerdynamic headphones I have (particularly the much cheaper Custom One Pro), I found the plastic used on the Lagoon to feel cheaper. I didn’t feel any metal in the Lagoon. While I would not call the build quality great by any means, it is not horrible, and efforts to improve it may have increased the weight of the headphone. Nevertheless, I am taking off a point and a half for the build quality.

Instead of the exterior lights most Bluetooth headphones have on the earcup, the Lagoon incorporates what Beyerdynamic calls the Light Guide System. These are LEDs on the inside of the earcup. When you turn the earphone on or take it off, they light up different colors to make it easy to see which earcup is the left or right. They also show battery life. I really liked this feature as I’ve always felt the lights on the outside of other headphones look ugly.

Lastly, I was pleased to learn that the faux leather earpads are replaceable. This means that when they inevitably get gross and wear out you can simply pop in a replacement set instead of having to buy another pair of headphones. There are several white plastic brackets under the earcup that hold it in place. It takes a good amount of force to pull them off, so they definitely won’t be coming off accidentally.

Bluetooth, Remote and Mic – 9.5/10
Beyerdynamic used Bluetooth 4.2 in the Lagoon. I would’ve liked to have seen the newer Bluetooth 5.0, but the Lagoon worked perfectly. It was easy to pair to my phone. Once paired, the connection was rock solid. It never cut out, not even for a moment. There is a pleasing female voice (not robotic sounding at all) that tells you the battery life and connection status when the headphones are turned on. Once you start playing music it tells you the codec being used (aptX Low Latency, aptX, AAC or SBC). Overall, the Bluetooth and voice feedback system worked excellently, regardless of the slightly older Bluetooth 4.2.

The right earcup serves as a touchpad instead of a three-button remote. This is becoming the norm with other noise cancelling headphones. Double tap pauses, a double tap and hold summons Siri, left and right swipes change tracks, and swiping up and down changes the volume. I had no issues with the touchpad's responsiveness. But personally, I would've preferred a three-button remote instead. The gestures, while simple, require more effort than simply pressing a button, and I occasionally triggered one accidentally when my hand rubbed against the right earcup while adjusting it. I took off half a point for this minor issue.

I made several calls using the built-in microphone and my callers had no complaints. It was nice being able to take calls hands free and have the noise cancelling as well.

Comfort – 9/10
I found the Lagoon to be comfortable when used indoors for extended periods of time. The clamping force is just enough to prevent the headphone from moving around too much while not putting too much pressure on the head. The headphone can be extended on each side to accommodate different head sizes and the earcups rotate as well to ensure a proper seal. The earpads surrounded my ears, but just barely. If you have big ears you might want to look elsewhere.

When it comes to outdoors use, you’re really at the mercy of the weather. The faux leather earpads made my ears sweaty after just a few minutes in hot weather. This made extending listening sessions very uncomfortable. I took off a point for this, but only one point, as other headphones with leather earpads do the same when I use them outside. Using a more breathable earpad material would’ve almost certainly reduced the effectiveness of the noise cancelling. Furthermore, other noise cancelling headphones I’ve tried have gotten just as sweaty. I’m sure the Lagoon would be excellent outside in more moderate or cool temperatures.

Passive Noise Isolation and ANC – 9.25/10
I found the Lagoon to have excellent overall noise isolation. While it doesn’t block out everything, it allows you to listen to music at a moderate volume and hear little, if anything, in the background. I used it on my loud commute and with the volume only slightly above halfway on my iPhone I was able to enjoy the music without getting distracted by the background that often. No noise cancelling headphone is going to block all noise.

The ANC works well. There are two levels, selectable by a switch on the right earcup. The higher-level blocks out more noise. Unfortunately, if you use the ANC in a quiet room with no music playing there is considerable white noise. This is annoying, but can be remedied by either playing music, which easily overshadows the white noise, or turning off the ANC. Even without the ANC the Lagoon still blocks a surprising amount of noise with just passive isolation.

Soundstage – 8.5/10
The soundstage is average for a closed headphone. There is good separation between different instruments and vocals, but the width and depth are slightly worse compared to my non-Bluetooth headphones without noise cancelling.

Highs (Treble) – 9.25/10
I had no complaints with the highs. Piano notes sound excellent and airy. There is a good amount of detail and resolution. There is sufficient sparkle without the sound becoming bright or piercing.

Mids – 8.25/10
The mids of the Lagoon were good, but not as great as what I'm used to in my other Beyedynamic headphones and high-end IEMs. Drum hits are clear, well-defined and impactful. Vocals are upfront, if a little recessed, and I was able to detect a bit of sibilance and reverberation on some tracks. Some of the bass can bleed into the lower mids at times. Nevertheless, I believe that the Lagoon will still outperform other noise-cancelling headphones in this category, so I only took off 1.75 points.

Lows (Bass) – 9.5/10
I enjoyed the bass of the Lagoon. The quantity is definitely above neutral. It is boomy, but not out of control. The individual frequencies aren't muddied together as on lesser headphones. The sub-bass hits hard and goes low. Overall, I found the bass to be excellent, especially on EDM, rap and rock tracks. I will point out that I prefer bass north of neutral, so if you don't you may not like the Lagoon's bass as much as I did.

It is important to note that when when I used outside and to commute, the sub-bass was the first to be drowned out by background noise, even if the background noises were being blocked by the passive noise isolation and ANC. So, expect bass to suffer if not used in a quiet listening environment. The same would be true for other headphones, so I am not taking off any points for this. It may be possible to use the Lagoon's Mosayc app to correct for this, but I did not attempt to do so.

Value – 9/10
Many manufacturers have come out with ANC headphones in the past few years. Flagship ANC headphones from a company like Bose or Sony range in price from $350-400. The Lagoon is priced at the very top of this range. None of these headphones are a good value based purely on sound alone. You’re paying extra and accepting other sacrifices in order to get that ANC. If you don’t need it, there are better options out there. That being said, I think the Lagoon offers a compelling value for the person looking for an ANC headphone with the best possible sound.

Selected Comparison
Bose QuietComfort 35 ($350)
– I had the opportunity to try out the original Bose QC35s for a few hours while I was reviewing the Lagoon. To me, the Lagoon sounds better in almost every way. The Bose is much less detailed. Both have comparable ANC. I thought the Bose was slightly better at cancelling out the lower frequencies and the Lagoon the higher frequencies. The Lagoon has better passive noise isolation, which probably helps block out the higher frequencies that ANC is less effective against. The Bose is more comfortable, as its earcups are deeper and felt like they had more memory foam inside them. Lastly, I felt the Bose had better build quality, with a harder and more durable plastic construction.

If I had to pick one of the two, I would pick the Lagoon. The sound is much better and the ANC is competitive. The Lagoon's build quality, while worse than the Bose, is not bad enough to be a dealbreaker. I do want to note that Bose just recently announced the successor to the QC35 series, the Bose Noise Cancelling Headphones 700. This new headphone retails for the same $400 as the Lagoon, and it would be a better comparison than the slightly cheaper and much older QC35.

Conclusion – 8.97/10
If you are in the market for an ANC headphone with excellent sound quality and competitive noise cancelling, I strongly recommend checking out the Lagoon. I was surprised by how much Beyerdynamic got right considering this is its first ANC headphone. While the ANC market is crowded, I think the Lagoon represents a strong offering that will definitely appeal to audiophiles and consumers alike.

Averaging out the scores for all seven categories results in a score of 8.97/10. This is almost exactly four and a half stars, which is the rating I will show on this review. However, you can change the weighting of the various categories to better reflect your own preferences and come up with your own rating.

Attachments

  • Box Angle.JPG
    Box Angle.JPG
    777.7 KB · Views: 0
  • Box Front.JPG
    Box Front.JPG
    510.7 KB · Views: 0
  • Box Back.JPG
    Box Back.JPG
    599.4 KB · Views: 0
  • Product Description.JPG
    Product Description.JPG
    816.3 KB · Views: 0
  • Package Contents.JPG
    Package Contents.JPG
    735.9 KB · Views: 0
  • Inside Box.JPG
    Inside Box.JPG
    504.1 KB · Views: 0
  • Case in Box.JPG
    Case in Box.JPG
    577.2 KB · Views: 0
  • Hardshell Case.JPG
    Hardshell Case.JPG
    697.5 KB · Views: 0
  • Other Contents.JPG
    Other Contents.JPG
    828.4 KB · Views: 0
  • Headphones in Case.JPG
    Headphones in Case.JPG
    682 KB · Views: 0
  • Headphones Stereo Lights.JPG
    Headphones Stereo Lights.JPG
    681.1 KB · Views: 0
Niyologist
Niyologist
I tried this out earlier this year. I'm glad someone else likes this too.

jeremy205100

100+ Head-Fier
Pros: Clarity, design, removable cable, comfort
Cons: No sub-bass, recessed mid-bass
Disclaimers:
1) This product was provided to me by Brainwavz as a review sample at no cost. There is no incentive for a positive rating and this review expresses my honest opinion of the product.
2) Audio is a very subjective hobby, and my opinions might not accurately reflect your preferences and experiences. So please keep this in mind when reading my review.
3) Due to the similarity of the two products, I have adapted some sections of this review from my previous review of the Brainwavz B150.

I welcome any feedback and questions.

Introduction
Brainwavz is a Chinese audio company that is based in Hong Kong. They are known for offering products that provide great sound quality at a great price. The B200 that I am reviewing is part of their balanced armature lineup, which consists of the single driver B100 ($49.50) and B150 ($69.50), as well as the dual driver B200 ($119.50) and quad driver B400 ($179.50). There was a first-generation B200 that had a similar housing design to the B100 and B150 but I am reviewing the newer second-generation that shares the housing design of the B400. All of these models feature plastic housings and are designed to be worn over-the-ear, but the B200 and B400 housings are 3D-printed from photopolymer resin. According to Brainwavz, this resin is very different from the ABS plastic most products are made of. The B100 and B150 have a fixed, non-removable cable while the B200 and B400 have standard MMCX connectors that allow the cable to be removed and replaced. The B200 comes with two cables, both of which are advertised as being OFC litz copper. These cables both terminate in a 3.5mm jack, with one including a 3-button remote control and microphone and the other not. I am reviewing the B200 at its current price of $119.50.

It is important to understand that the B200 uses two balanced armature drivers, and what this means for sound. Balanced armature drivers generally have more detail than dynamic ones, with the downside of offering weaker bass. This problem is often rectified by using multi-driver designs. When I reviewed the B150 almost a year ago, I commented on how I wasn’t aware of any balanced armature competitors in its price range. I feel like in the past year this has changed greatly, with Massdrop and others offering their own balanced armature models. But Brainwavz was at the forefront of bringing balanced armature designs to consumers at an affordable price, and it is important to keep price in mind, as Brainwavz is clearly targeting this model at someone on a budget that likely wouldn’t have previously considered a balanced armature IEM due to the higher price.

For this review, I used my iPhone 6 as a source and music ranging from 320kbps Spotify to lossless. I own higher end desktop sources, but believe that IEMs should be able to be driven well from a smartphone. While the B200 might sound slightly better with more expensive equipment, I believe that at its price point the vast majority of customers will be using it with just a smartphone. As such, they are relatively easy to drive at 30Ω, and I had no issues using them with my iPhone. Brainwavz specifies the frequency response as 12 Hz – 22 KHz, and the sensitivity as 110 dB at 1 mW. Rounding out the specs is a 24-month warranty, which is competitive at this price point.

The best place to buy the B200, or any of its siblings, is probably from Brainwavz’s own website. The links above will take you to it.

Design and Accessories – 9/10
The design and workmanship of the B200 is great. The housings are a durable plastic with a clear, semi-transparent color that makes them really stand out. I found it cool being able to see the drivers and wiring through the housing. Each housing has an embedded left or right channel marker, although they are difficult to see if not looking closely. The MMCX connectors seem durable and are an excellent change from the B150. The inclusion of these standard connectors means that a plethora of replacement cables can be used. If using one of the included cables, extending from the MMCX connectors are rubber strain reliefs that connect to the ear guides. These strain reliefs also have a channel marker on them, and I found them easier to read than the ones on the housings themselves. The rubber ear guides work great. They are soft enough to mold over your ear without irritation, and in general do an excellent job of keeping the B200 secure. After about three inches, the ear guides give way to the cable, which is thin, but also seems sturdy. The two-piece splitter provides some strain relief to the lower portion of the cable, which is braided and slightly thicker. The termination is a very well-made straight 3.5mm jack. The jack is thin enough that it should easily fit through the opening on most phone cases.

For this review I used the included cable with a three-button remote control and microphone. I found the microphone worked well. None of my callers noticed a difference in sound-quality compared to using the phone’s built in mic. The three-button remote is a welcome improvement from the B150, but I found it to be difficult to use. All three buttons are the same shape and close together, which makes it hard to tell where to press for each button. I deducted half a point from this section because of this.

The packaging is an upgrade compared to the B150, with a fancier cardboard box. The inner packaging flips open to reveal the cable without a microphone and the hard-shell carrying case, containing the B200 with medium silicone tips preinstalled, a pouch containing five other sizes of silicone tips, a pair of red T100 medium Comply foam tips, a clip to attach the cable to your shirt and a user manual. A Velcro band is also provided with each cable to keep the B200 wrapped-up when inside the case.

The case is black, with red accents providing a nice contrast and complement. There is a metal Brainwavz logo embedded in the bottom-right of the top. The case does a great job of protecting the B200 and holding all of the included accessories. I have deducted half a point from this section because the case, while functional, is almost too thick to be pocketable. Overall though, I am very pleased with the B200’s accessory package. Including two cables means that the customer can choose whether or not they want a remote and microphone and also have a backup cable in case the primary one fails. There is an abundance of silicon and foam tips included as well as cable clips and velcro bands.

Comfort, Fit and Isolation – 9/10
I have grouped these three together because I believe that for IEMs they are all intimately related. If you don’t get a good fit, the earphones are likely to be uncomfortable and not isolate well.

As discussed previously, the B200 comes with six different sizes of black silicone tips and one pair of medium red Comply foam tips. Foam tips generally provide more isolation, and can be more comfortable, but they are more of a pain to take in and out and need to be replaced every few months. I initially tried various silicon tips and was unable to get a good fit. The housing went too deep into my ear when using the silicon tips, causing irritation. There was also a small bump on one of the housings that rubbed against my ear. I believe this might have been a defect from the 3D-printing process. Fortunately, the Comply tips gave me an excellent fit with no irritation. When using the foam tips I am able to wear them for hours at a time, so I have not deducted any points for the issues I experienced with the silicon tips. To me this experience just further reinforced how important it is to try each included tip because what works best for some might not be what works best for others. The cable guides do a great job of keeping the housings inside your ears. They don’t fall out on their own, even when shaking my head vigorously in an effort to make them do so. So once I found the best-fitting tips, it has been easy to get and maintain a good fit.

The B200 has below average cable microphonics, as do most other over-the-ear designs. This means that when you walk or move around with them you will hear less of the cable rubbing against your shirt. They also do a great job blocking out noise when used with the Comply tips. When I walked around with them outside while listening to music, I could not hear any of the cars or other noises from the environment. For regular on-the-go use, the B200 will be great. However, for flying I would still prefer an IEM or headphone with active noise cancelling to block out engine noise.

The comfort is excellent. I have not experienced any discomfort, even during long listening sessions. The plastic housings fit in my ears well. The B200 is definitely among the most comfortable IEMs that I have yet to use.

Soundstage – 9/10
The soundstage of the B200 is great for an IEM. When listening to more complicated tracks the imaging does a great job separating the different instruments and vocals. Vocals in particular are close and up front which makes the music more intimate. I also wouldn’t go so far to say that the soundstage compares to an open headphone or an open IEM such as Audeze’s iSINE series, but it does a great job overall and I have no complaints.

Highs (Treble) – 9.25/10
I have really enjoyed the highs on the B150 and rank it well above average in this category. Strings, piano notes and cymbals are all very clear. Higher piano notes have a nice sparkle to them. There is a great amount of detail and resolution. I wouldn’t call the B200 bright or piercing.

Mids – 8.75/10
The mids on the B200 are great. Vocals, both male and female, sound excellent. I want to emphasize how great the B200 sounds for vocals. On high-quality recordings I sometimes felt like I was there in the studio with the artist. Drum hits sound fast, but are somewhat lacking in depth and extension, particularly in lower-quality recordings. I also felt the blending between the mids and the lows is a bit muddy. Despite these criticisms, the sound is non-fatiguing.

Lows (Bass) – 6.5/10
My biggest disappointment with the B200 was the bass. I had high hopes that it would be better than the B150’s due to the additional driver, but it is not. The sub-bass is nonexistent. There is little boom or rumble. When listening to some of my favorite rap or EDM tracks I just feel like something is missing. The B200’s bass is not going to satisfy a basshead either in quantity or extension. That being said, the mid-bass is present and I found it to be fast, tight and accurate. Those that prefer neutral or less bass might not mind the B200’s bass. It definitely doesn’t bleed into the excellent mids or highs, and I was only bothered by it on electric or bass-centered tracks. I felt it did a fine job keeping up on acoustic recordings.

Value – 17/20
I have increased the weight of this section to twenty, up from ten, given that this IEM is targeted towards those on a budget. I think the B200 represents a tremendous value to someone looking for a neutral or bass-light sound signature. It combines high-quality sound with durable construction, MMCX connectors that allow for the cable to be switched out and an excellent accessory package. A twenty-four-month warranty provides plenty of reassurance that the B200 will last. To summarize, I think the B200 represents a strong value at its price. However, its price is nearly double that of the B150, and I found that its weak bass prevented the B200 from excelling at all musical genres. Therefore, I have deducted three points from this category, as a customer looking for a single IEM to listen to all genres with may want to look elsewhere.

Selected Comparisons
Brainwavz B150 ($69.50) – I imagine many reading this are wondering whether or not the B200 is worth the additional money compared to the B150. And this is not an easy answer. First of all, the B150 is much more barebones. The cable is not removable, there is no microphone or three-button remote, the materials are slightly worse and the design is more boring. But it is not simply a case of gaining these features by upgrading to the B200, since the two IEMs have very different sound signatures. The B150 has better bass, with more quantity, extension and accuracy than the B200. This comes at a price though, as the B150 loses some, but not all, of the clarity in the mids and highs that make the B200 great. The vocals are more recessed on the B150, and the soundstage is slightly worse as well. The accessory package is almost identical for both IEMs, except for the fact that the B200 comes with an additional replacement cable. I still think the B150 represents a tremendous value for the money, and whether or not someone is better served with it or the B200 will depend on their preferred sound signature and whether they require the additional features offered only by the B200.

Final F4100 ($279) – The Final F4100 is a single balanced armature design. The F4100 also includes a generous accessory package, with better silicon tips and more foam tip options. The included silicon carrying case is much nicer and more practical than the B200’s hard case, in my opinion. However, the F4100 only comes with one cable and there is no microphone or three-button remote. The included cable is more microphonic than the B200’s, especially when worn down instead of over the ears. In addition, the F4100’s non-standard MMCX connectors make finding third-party replacement cables near impossible. When it comes to the design, the F4100 is extremely tiny, looks elegant and is comfortable to wear for extended periods of time. The design of the F4100 is definitely more unconventional compared to the B200, but both are well-designed and visually appealing. The sounds are definitely different. The F4100 has the same clarity in the highs in mids as the B200, with much better bass. The F4100’s bass is definitely neutral, with better quantity, extension and accuracy than the B200. The F4100 has an incredible soundstage and imaging that is slightly above the B200. Overall, I definitely think the F4100 sounds better than the B200 in all areas. But I feel the B200 can compete with the F4100 given its equally impressive accessory package and clarity, despite its shortcomings in the lows. Given that its price is less than half of the F4100’s, the fact that the B200 is able to offer a somewhat similar sound signature in a more affordable and smartphone-friendly package makes it an option worth considering.

Conclusion – 8.56/10
My recommendation of the B200 really depends on what genres you listen to and how much bass you prefer. If you tend to listen to mostly acoustical, vocal and live recordings then you will likely love the B200’s clarity and superb highs and mids. If you listen to a lot of rap or EDM you will likely find yourself missing the sub-bass and wanting more. On its site, Brainwavz claims the B200 are tuned to, “produce a balanced and accurate sound signature, with little to no coloring.” At its price point of $119.50, I feel the B200 has done a good job at achieving this goal.

Averaging out the scores for all seven categories results in a score of 8.56/10. This is in between four and five stars. As it is below the cutoff for four and a half stars, 9/10, I am going to go ahead and show the rating of four stars on this review. However, you can change the weighting of the various categories to better reflect your own preferences and come up with your own rating.

Attachments

  • Box.JPG
    Box.JPG
    348.5 KB · Views: 0
  • B200 Text.JPG
    B200 Text.JPG
    431.1 KB · Views: 0
  • Box Bottom.JPG
    Box Bottom.JPG
    414.2 KB · Views: 0
  • Features.jpg
    Features.jpg
    472.9 KB · Views: 0
  • Inside Box.jpg
    Inside Box.jpg
    477.1 KB · Views: 0
  • Box Opened.jpg
    Box Opened.jpg
    583.9 KB · Views: 0
  • Inside Box Text.jpg
    Inside Box Text.jpg
    571.3 KB · Views: 0
  • Inside Box Side Text.jpg
    Inside Box Side Text.jpg
    607.1 KB · Views: 0
  • Case in Box.jpg
    Case in Box.jpg
    674 KB · Views: 0
  • Box Thank You Text.jpg
    Box Thank You Text.jpg
    628.7 KB · Views: 0
  • Extra Cable.jpg
    Extra Cable.jpg
    455.5 KB · Views: 0
  • Case.jpg
    Case.jpg
    718 KB · Views: 0
  • Case Opened.jpg
    Case Opened.jpg
    691.3 KB · Views: 0
  • B200 in Case.jpg
    B200 in Case.jpg
    688.3 KB · Views: 0
  • Accessories.jpg
    Accessories.jpg
    551.9 KB · Views: 0
  • Cable with Mic.jpg
    Cable with Mic.jpg
    551.4 KB · Views: 0
  • Both Earbuds.jpg
    Both Earbuds.jpg
    480.1 KB · Views: 0
  • MMCX Connector.jpg
    MMCX Connector.jpg
    471.6 KB · Views: 0
  • Earbud Inside.jpg
    Earbud Inside.jpg
    496.7 KB · Views: 0
  • Earbud Outside.jpg
    Earbud Outside.jpg
    454.9 KB · Views: 0

jeremy205100

100+ Head-Fier
Pros: Price, overall sound, bass, two-year warranty
Cons: Slightly veiled mids, no microphone or remote
Disclaimers:
1) This product was provided to me by Brainwavz as a review sample at no cost. There is no incentive for a positive rating and this review expresses my honest opinion of the product.
2) Audio is a very subjective hobby, and my opinions might not accurately reflect your preferences and experiences. So please keep this in mind when reading my review.

I welcome any feedback and questions.

Introduction
Brainwavz is a Chinese audio company that is based in Hong Kong. They are known for offering products that provide great sound quality at a great price. The B150 that I am reviewing is part of their balanced armature lineup, which consists of the single driver B100 ($49.50) and B150 ($69.50), as well as the dual driver B200 ($119.50) and quad driver B400 ($179.50). All of these models feature plastic housings and are designed to worn over-the-ear, but the B200 and B400 are 3D printed. The B100 and B150 have a fixed, non-removable cable while the B200 and B400 have standard MMCX connectors that allow the cable to be removed and replaced. All have cables that are advertised as being OFC copper. The entire B-series recently had price cuts, and the B150 in particular was reduced to $69.50 from its previous $109.50. I will be reviewing it at the current, lower price.

Although I do not want to make a definitive statement, I have not been able to find any balanced armature IEMs that are cheaper than the B150, aside from its little brother, the B100. Balanced armature drivers generally have more detail than dynamic ones, with the downside of offering weaker bass. This problem is often rectified by using multi-driver designs, but at the B150’s price point it has to make due with just one driver. It is important to keep price in mind, as Brainwavz is clearly targeting this model at someone on a budget that likely wouldn’t have previously considered a balanced armature IEM due to the higher price.

For this review, I used my iPhone 6 as a source and music ranging from 320kbps Spotify to lossless. I own higher end desktop sources, but believe that IEMs should be able to be driven well from a smartphone. While the B150 might sound slightly better with more expensive equipment, I believe that at its price point the vast majority of customers will be using it with just a smartphone. As such, they are relatively easy to drive at 30Ω, and I had no issues using them with my iPhone. Brainwavz specifies the frequency response as 16 Hz – 22 KHz, and the sensitivity as 105 dB at 1 mW. The cable is 1.3m long. Rounding out the specs is a 24-month warranty, which is very competitive at this price point.

The best place to buy the B150, or any of its siblings, is probably from Brainwavz’s own website. The links above will take you to it.

Design and Accessories – 8/10
The design and workmanship of the B150 is good and solid, if a bit boring. The housings are a glossy black plastic and seem very sturdy. Left and right channel markers are embedded into the plastic housings, although they are a bit hard to see. They are adequate though, especially since the over-ear design makes it impossible to mix up the channels as the ear guide will go over your ear in the wrong direction. The housings will also not fit into the wrong ear properly. Extending from the housings are rubber strain reliefs that connect to the ear guides. The rubber ear guides work great. They are soft enough to mold over your ear without irritation, and in general do an excellent job of keeping the B150 secure. After about three inches, the ear guides give way to the cable, which is thin, but also seems sturdy. The splitter provides some strain relief to the lower portion of the cable, which is braided and slightly thicker. The termination is a very well-made 45o 3.5mm jack. Of note, is that the jack is thicker than most and just barely fit into my phone’s case. If you use a case that is tight-fitting around the headphone jack you might run into issues and need an extender.

Included in the simple cardboard box is the hard-shell carrying case, containing the B150 with medium silicone tips preinstalled, a pouch containing four other sizes of silicone tips, a pair of red T100 medium Comply foam tips, a clip to attach the cable to your shirt and a user manual. A Velcro band is also provided to keep the B150 wrapped-up when inside the case. The inclusion of genuine Comply foam tips is welcome at this price point.

The case is black, with red accents providing a nice contrast and complement. There is a metal Brainwavz logo embedded in the bottom-right of the top. The case does a great job of protecting the B150 and holding all of the included accessories. While it is pocketable, it is a bit fatter than I would have liked. The tips, case and cable clip might seem to be a bit basic, but at this price point I think that they form a great and competitive accessories package.

Overall, I am satisfied with the design and accessories. Brainwavz clearly used a relatively basic design in order to be able to focus on the sound. Nevertheless, I have deducted two points from this section. One-half point each for the case being almost too thick to be pocketable and the bland all black design. The other point is for the lack of a microphone and remote-control on the cable. At this price point, and considering that it is aimed for use with smartphones, I would have appreciated an included mic, or at least the option to pay slightly more for one. Taking phone calls is annoying without one, and I like the convenience of the three-button remote on the cable. This exclusion would have been less of an issue if the cable was removable or it was clearly designed for at home use, but neither of these are the case.

Comfort, Fit and Isolation – 9/10
I have grouped these three together because I believe that for IEMs they are all intimately related. If you don’t get a good fit, the earphones are likely to be uncomfortable and not isolate well.

As discussed previously, the B150 comes with five different sizes of black silicone tips and one pair of medium red Comply foam tips. Foam tips generally provide more isolation, and can be more comfortable, but they are more of a pain to take in and out and need to be replaced every few months. The medium silicone tips are preinstalled, and gave me a good seal right out of the box. While they are not the best silicone tips I have ever used, they are above average and definitely do their job. I did not feel the need to try any of the other included tips, or substitute other tips from another brand. The cable guides do a great job of keeping the housings inside your ears. They don’t fall out on their own, even when shaking my head vigorously in an effort to make them do so. So it is easy to get and maintain a good fit.

The B150 has below average cable microphonics, as do most other over-the-ear designs. This means that when you walk or move around with them you will hear less of the cable rubbing against your shirt. They also do a great job blocking out noise. When I walked around with them outside while listening to music, I could not hear any of the cars or other noises from the environment. For regular on-the-go use, the B150 will be great. However, for flying I would still prefer an IEM or headphone with active noise cancelling to block out engine noise.

The comfort is good. I have not experienced any discomfort, even during long listening sessions. The plastic housings can be a bit clunky, but they fit in my ears well. Although I have used more comfortable IEMs, the B150 is definitely above average and doesn’t present any issues.

Soundstage – 8.5/10
The soundstage of the B150 is above average. When listening to more complicated tracks the imaging does a great job separating the different instruments and vocals. On some tracks vocals can seem a tiny bit distant, but I attribute this more to poor recording quality than the B150. I also wouldn’t go so far to say that the soundstage compares to an open headphone or an open IEM such as Audeze’s iSINE series, but it does a great job overall and I have no complaints.

Highs (Treble) – 8.75/10
I have really enjoyed the highs on the B150. I wouldn’t go so far as to say that I can hear the air in between an artist’s breath as on some much more expensive IEMs. That being said, strings, piano notes and cymbals are all very clear. Higher piano notes have a nice sparkle to them. There is a great amount of detail and resolution. I wouldn’t call the B150 bright or piercing.

Mids – 8/10
If I had to find fault with one aspect of the B150’s sound, the mids would be it. Vocals, especially male vocals, can sound veiled at times and lack detail and clarity. This does depend on the track somewhat, so it should be at least partially attributed to the poor quality of the recording. That being said, this can lessen the listener’s enjoyment. Drums have slightly better detail and clarity, although the intersection between the mids and the lows might be described as a bit muddy. Despite these criticisms, the sound is non-fatiguing.

Lows (Bass) – 9/10
For me, the bass was definitely the most surprising aspect of the B150’s sound. It is impactful, hits low and has a tiny bit of boom and rumble. I would describe it as mostly accurate and well-controlled. It is slightly elevated above neutral, but it doesn’t ruin the mids and highs. The quantity of bass might not be enough to fully satisfy a basshead, and those that prefer less bass might call it a tiny bit muddy. That being said, I have really liked the B150’s bass and think it strikes a nice balance between neutral and basshead, while keeping accuracy at a high level.

Value – 20/20
I have increased the weight of this section to twenty, up from ten, given that this IEM is targeted towards those on a budget. I definitely think the B150 deserves the full twenty points. I picked apart the sound to find any fault I could, and in the end, I must say my criticisms are minor when the low $70 price is taken into account. I am confident that the B150 can go head-to-head with other IEMs under the $200 price point, and perhaps even above that. While the B150 lacks the premium construction of more expensive IEMs, the sound it delivers for the price is stellar. In addition, you get a very nice package of accessories for the price, including genuine Comply foam tips. A twenty-four-month warranty provides plenty of reassurance that the B150 will last. To summarize, I think the B150 represents a tremendous value at its price.

Selected Comparisons
Final F4100 ($279) – The Final F4100 is also a single balanced armature design. The F4100 includes a nicer accessory package, with better silicon tips and more foam tip options. The included silicon carrying case is also much nicer than the B150’s. When it comes to the design, the F4100 is extremely tiny, looks more elegant, and is much more comfortable to wear over extended periods of time. It also has a removable cable. That being said, the included cable is more microphonic than the B150’s. The sounds are definitely different. The B150 has much better bass, while the F4100 has clearer mids and slightly better highs. Overall, I feel the B150 competes very well on sound given its price is a quarter of the F4100’s, yet the F4100 definitely has a more premium design and better included accessories. But these two IEMs have very different sound signatures.

Conclusion – 8.91/10
At its price point of $70, I can recommend the B150 without reservation. While I would have liked to have had a more pocketable carrying case, an option for a built-in microphone and remote and perhaps a bit fancier of a design, it is clear that Brainwavz focused on the sound of the B150, and they delivered. Even though I own IEMs that retail for hundreds of dollars, I think the B150’s sound is inoffensive and does everything well. While the mids could be slightly better, at this price point that is nitpicking. So to conclude, the B150 gives audiophile-quality sound at a bargain price. It would make a good backup or beater pair, or gift to friends.

Averaging out the scores for all seven categories results in a score of 8.91/10. This is in between four and five stars. As it is just below the cutoff for a five, 9/10, I am going to go ahead and show that rating on this review as I think the B150 deserves it for the tremendous value that it represents. However, you can change the weighting of the various categories to better reflect your own preferences and come up with your own rating.

Box Side Angle.JPG
Inner Packaging.JPG
Case.JPG
Brainwavz.JPG
Case Contents.JPG
Contents on Table.JPG
Comply Tips.JPG
Both Sides.JPG
Left Side.JPG
Right Side.JPG
Side Markings.JPG
Silicon Tip.JPG
Connector.JPG

Bonus Review:
Krudul Duo – 5/5
Brainwavz also sent me their Krudul Duo, which is a package of two IEM holders. One has the adhesive at a right angle to allow it to be mounted on a monitor, and the other has it straight at the end to allow it to be mounted anywhere else. I was very impressed with the build quality of both units. Brainwavz advertises on its website that both units are constructed from die-cast aluminum and it certainly feels that way. I could see them being useful if you listen to IEMs at home a lot and don’t want to have to go through the hassle of taking them in and out of the case every time you use them. Instead, you could just hang them on one of the Kruduls and be able to grab them and listen. For the price of $14.99, if you think you would benefit from the Krudul, I’d definitely recommend it.

Krudul Box Front.JPG
Krudul Box Back.JPG
Krudul Box Contents.JPG
Krudul Monitor.JPG
Krudul Vertical Adhesive.JPG
Earphones in Krudul.JPG

jeremy205100

100+ Head-Fier
Pros: Excellent highs and mids, beautiful cable, practical carrying case
Cons: Weak bass, channel markings aren't very clear
Disclaimers:
1) This product was provided to me by Final as a review sample at no cost. There is no incentive for a positive rating and this review expresses my honest opinion of the product. I also feel compelled to mention that I purchased the F7200’s younger sibling, the F4100, with my own money at CanJam NYC 2017.
2) Audio is a very subjective hobby, and my opinions might not accurately reflect your preferences and experiences. So please keep this in mind when reading my review.

Also, as this is my first review, I welcome any feedback and questions.

F7200.jpg

Introduction
Final (formerly Final Audio Design) is a Japanese audio company that was founded in 2009, but their history designing speakers and vinyl accessories dates back to 1974. Currently, they produce IEMs and headphones. The F7200 is the premium model of the F7200 ($479), F4100 ($279) and F3100 ($189) range. All three models contain the same single balanced armature driver with slightly different tunings. The F3100 lacks a removable cable and the F4100 lacks the premium cable and stainless steel construction of the F7200.

Final claims that these three earphones are the smallest in the world, and I see no reason to doubt that. In a market of countless IEMs with an ever-increasing number of drivers, the F7200 stands out for its minimalist approach. It keeps things simple, which in my view isn’t a bad thing.

Included in the simple cardboard box is the case, containing the F7200, the cable and the silicon tips, a paper roll containing the foam tips, the safe fit rings and earwax filters for the driver units, as well as paper documentation and the warranty card.

IMG_9245.JPG
IMG_9252.JPG
IMG_9254.JPG
IMG_9256.JPG
IMG_9267.JPG
IMG_9274.JPG IMG_9283.JPG
IMG_9289.JPG
For this review, I used my iPhone 6 as a source and music ranging from 320kbps Spotify to lossless. I own higher end desktop sources, but believe that IEMs should be able to be driven well from a smartphone. The F7200 might sound slightly better with more expensive equipment, but they are relatively easy to drive at 42Ω, so I wouldn’t expect much of a difference. Final doesn’t provide a frequency response range or much else with regards to specs.

A Google search will bring up several authorized dealers that are selling the F7200 online. That is probably the easiest way to buy it if you’re interested.

Design – 10/10
The design and workmanship of the F7200 is superb. The headphone jack, splitter and earphones themselves are all made out of stainless steel. This is in contrast to the F4100 and F3100, which both use a magnesium-aluminum alloy. Stainless steel gives the unit a sophisticated and luxurious look and feel. The only downside of the stainless steel is that it can act as a fingerprint magnet, but due to the small size of the earphones it’s hard to notice unless you’re actively looking for it.

The cable deserves a paragraph of its own, as it is an excellent cable and a huge upgrade over the basic one included with the F4100. The F7200’s 1.2-meter removable cable has of a total of four strands of oxygen free copper (OFC) with silver coating. Each channel consists of two braided strands in a PVC tube, and the two tubes are beautifully braided prior to the splitter. The 3.5mm headphone jack is mostly stainless steel, with a small amount of plastic. It is very cleanly designed and has excellent strain relief. The other two ends of the cable terminate in industrial looking right-angle MMCX connectors. This is good as it allows the cable to be replaced or upgraded if necessary, but I have not found any other companies that make cables with these right-angle connectors and using standard straight MMCX cables will look silly and prove impractical. The only after-market company I have found that can make cables with them is Null Audio in Singapore, but I can’t speak to their quality. That being said, this cable is beautiful and extremely well made. I don’t see it failing anytime soon. And due to its high quality, I imagine it would please nearly all audiophiles, especially since it would cost a majority of the price of the F7200 to buy a serious upgrade. The only downside with regards to the cable is that the left and right channel markers are somewhat hard to see and the nub that marks the left channel took some getting used to until I was able to pick it out by feel. But this is a minor issue.

The case is silicon and can best be described as practical. It consists of a dome with a main compartment that holds the F7200 and then has the cable wrapped around the sides. The 3.5mm connector is then placed under the tray in a bottom compartment. This bottom compartment can also be used to store tips, but you would need to be careful as they might fall out when it is opened to remove the 3.5mm connector. The case is very compact and easily pocketable. I am also confident that it will more than adequately protect the F7200 for mobile use.

There are only two design issues that I can think of. The first is that the driver units can rotate on the MMCX connectors and spin around, although this doesn’t bother me. They will not come off of the connectors without some force, so there is no need to worry about them accidentally falling off. The second is that Final puts in fine print on its website and in the included documentation that the right angle MMCX connectors were not designed for frequent connecting and disconnecting. I have tried removing them and reattaching them several times and have had no issues, but it’s probably best not to do this unless the cable dies or you want to upgrade it. They do reserve the right not to cover the unit under the warranty if it is found that it failed due to terminal failure from frequently disconnecting the MMCX connectors. When purchased form an authorized dealer, the F7200 is backed by a two-year warranty.

To summarize this long section, the F7200 is made in Japan, and the workmanship is excellent. The connections between components are flawless. The change between the stainless-steel driver units to the gold MMCX connectors and then to the cable are perfect and aesthetically pleasing. This continues throughout to the 3.5mm jack. The case is compact and practical.

Comfort, Fit and Isolation – 9/10
I have grouped these three together because I believe that for IEMs they are all intimately related. If you don’t get a good fit, the earphones are likely to be uncomfortable and not isolate well.

The F7200 comes with five pairs of Final’s excellent E Type silicon tips and three pairs of foam tips that cover the entire driver unit. These are very different than typical Comply foam tips. Final’s silicon tips are the best I have yet used, and I have used a lot over the years. According to a pamphlet I received from Final at CanJam NYC 2017, the E Type earpieces, “employ two types of silicon differing in rigidity for the sound conduit and for the earbud that comes into contact with the user’s ear.” I used the medium silicon earpieces for this review. With these ear tips, it is easy to get a good seal and the F7200 stays put in my ear. Often with other IEMs, I will need to adjust the fit every ten or so minutes to keep a good seal. This isn’t necessary with the F7200.

The F7200 includes a pair of safe fit rings that prevent the driver units from pushing through the silicon earpieces and damaging the ear. I haven’t found it necessary to use these since the silicon tips grip the driver units so tightly, but if you are concerned about this they are there for you to use.

Unfortunately, the cable is very microphonic and noisy when worn down under the ears. I still prefer wearing them this way when at home since I can barely tell they’re there, but when on the go I wear them over the ear with the included ear hooks. This works well and essentially eliminates the noise from the cable.

The F7200 does a good job isolating outside noise. I have had no issues using it outside and on the go, although for flying I would still opt for a set of headphones with active noise canceling.

Overall, the F7200 are very comfortable. The silicon tips allow a fast and easy seal and prevent the unit from falling out when walking. I didn’t try running with these or anything too extreme, though.

Soundstage – 8.5/10
The F7200 has a very good soundstage with impressive imaging, especially considering its tiny size. Instruments have very good separation. This makes them easier to identify and pick out in more complex and layered tracks. While the soundstage is good, it is unrealistic to expect it to match those of Audeze’s open iSINE and other more conventional open-back headphones.

Highs (Treble) – 8.5/10
The highs are very good. I would describe the treble as airy, spacious and clear, with no sibilance. Piano notes and string instruments have good presence, and sound natural. Well-recorded acoustic tracks really shine. A harsh critic might point out that the highest frequencies are slightly exaggerated, but I like them as they are and think that they help prevent the sound from being boring and bland.

Mids – 9.5/10
I’ve read that Final products are known for their excellent midrange, and the F7200 certainly lives up to this reputation. The mids are accurate, smooth and clear. The midrange is very detailed and it is easy to distinguish the different sounds. I don’t find it to be overwhelming at all. They sound very natural, so much so that on well-recorded tracks I often feel like the artist is in the room with me. I have found that on some tracks female vocals can be a just a bit bright, but I fault the recording and mastering quality for this and not the F7200 as it occurs on a minority of tracks. Lower-frequency guitar and piano notes are clear, and positioned so that they appear to come from behind the vocals. I have found that this presentation makes it easy to relax and get lost in the music. When listening for several hours at a time, I haven’t experienced any fatigue and don’t tire of the sound.

Lows (Bass) – 6/10
If the F7200 falls short in one area, this is it. The bass is lacking, although I wouldn’t go so far as to call it anemic. There isn’t much sub-bass, due to the use of a single balanced armature driver, and the bass isn’t boomy at all. When listening to genres such as EDM, rap, dance or bass-heavy electronic music, it leaves me wanting more and unsatisfied. But on more bass-light genres, such as country, classical, some pop, some rock and vocal recordings, it can keep up and doesn’t diminish the enjoyment I get from the sound. If anything, on these tracks it really allows the mids and highs to shine through. I don’t think that the weak bass ruins the sound, but for me it has limited the genres which I can use the F7200 to listen to. It’s a bit disappointing that this weak spot in the sound exists, but this might be preferable to some and is an inevitable tradeoff of the single balanced armature design. I would also consider myself a basshead, so depending on your preferences these criticisms may not be as applicable.

Value – 6.5/10
With the F7200, I was expecting a large step up in sound compared to the my F4100, and I’m disappointed to say that I didn’t find it. They both sound very similar. That doesn’t mean that the F7200 is bad, as the extra $200 gets you better build quality and a vastly better cable. The F7200 is a much more stylish and luxurious product compared to the barebones F4100. Since the F7200 sounds very similar to its less-expensive sibling, I would have to label the F4100 as a much better value. But if you like the sound signature this IEM provides, and your budget allows it, the F7200 is a better product and will likely last longer due to the better build quality and cable.

Selected Comparisons
Final F4100 ($279)
– I have found it hard to distinguish the difference between these two. If I had to put it into words, I would say the F4100 is a tiny bit warmer and has highs that are just a tad brighter than the F7200. But as they use the same driver, the sound signature is extremely similar. If I had to quantify it, I’d say there’s less than a 5% difference. Unfortunately, the F4100 has worse (although still acceptable) build quality and a much worse (but still microphonic) cable that is thinner and isn’t braided.

RHA T20i ($249) – I use the bronze treble filters on my T20s. The biggest difference between these two is the level of bass. The T20 has boomy, while still accurate bass, which the F7200 lacks. This makes it much better for bass-heavy genres such as EDM, dance and rap. However, the bass on the T20 slightly muddies the other frequencies, so the vocals are much clearer on the F7200. The highs are also a little overwhelming on the T20 when compared to the F7200. The F7200 is more comfortable for long listening sessions, while the T20 is better for on-the-go listening and features an iOS remote with volume control. I’d describe the T20 as an excellent value, since it’s so flexible, but it’s a very different product than the F7200.

Bose QuietComfort 20 ($249) – These are active-noise canceling earbuds, and don’t go fully in the ear. This makes them as comfortable as the F7200. The QC20s have a slight hiss from the noise cancellation when no music is playing. They sound nice in active mode, due to built-in digital signal processing, but I think that the F7200 has clearer vocals and a better soundstage. The QC20s have highs that sound a little veiled, but better, although slightly muddy, bass.

Conclusion – 8.29/10
Due to its weak bass, the F7200 is not suitable for bassheads or as an all-rounder IEM. But if you’d like to add an IEM to your collection that makes acoustic, live and classical recordings sound wonderful, the F7200 should definitely be on your list of models to audition. If the price is too high for you, save $200 and grab the F4100, resting assured that you are sacrificing little in terms of sound quality. In the arms race to see who can shove the most drivers into a cookie-cutter IEM enclosure, it’s refreshing to see a company take a step back and release an IEM that embraces a simpler design.

Averaging out the scores for all seven categories results in a score of 8.285/10. This is slightly higher than four stars, which is the rating that will be shown on this review. However, you can change the weighting of the various categories to better reflect your own preferences.
  • Like
Reactions: kmmbd and Blizniak
Back
Top