Reviews by KT66

KT66

Headphoneus Supremus
Pros: Effortless hi end sound, stunning wooden cups
Cons: Maybe look and feel of foam cups, but these are not for outdoors
The GS1000e's are over ear, open back headphones. They are part of the Grado Statement range.
 
I had the wonderful opportunity to try these out before xmas, so thought I'd share my thoughts, the review has taken ages to write, making a final decision on these headphones has been very difficult for a number of reasons, that I will explain.
 
First Impressions
Well the cardboard box didn't give any hint of the wonders inside, the packaging could be for a SR60, if the GS1000e was written on the box you wouldn't know.
Maybe the retail version will have a nicer box? Should we be bothered? Do we want to pay extra for a nice box?
This is where companies like Hifiman and Hisoundaudio excel, or used to, the opening of the package and box was quite special.
 
So not the best of starts. If that type of thing concerns you, Appleboys won't be initially impressed!  
 
Me?, I'd rather not pay extra for a fancy box. Maybe it could be an add on extra?
 
DSC_0037.jpg
 
Build
The wood is simply stunning, now you see where the money goes, the cups produce an automatic “woooh” when someone sees them.
 
The thick cables ooze quality.
Compared to my SR60, when held in the hand they feel like an “S Class (Merc) compared to the 190e (Merc) of the SR60.
 
Then the foam cup/cushion.......it feels like it's on the wrong product, like an afterthought, a last minute addition to the design, it's soft, slightly flappy
and reminds me of the collars you put on cats to stop them from biting themselves, it's like hard foam, don't think it's rubber.
 
The headband and sliders are typical Grado but definitely several notches up in quality compared to the SR range.
 
Look at the marketing shots of these cans, find me one that shows someone actually wearing them!
You won't, or I can't anyway.
Why?
Because they look crazy on the head, however if that bothers you then you are completely missing the point.
 
DSC_0041.jpg
Here my 9 year old son loving the Grados
 
 
I think Grado have made a no compromise, audio quality first product, it doesn't matter what they look like, if they make you look like a sick cat.
It doesn't matter that the foam cups seem like something you'd find on the floor of a plumbers van. The design produces world class sonics.
 
In a world defined by looks over performance (Apple, Beats, A&K etc) I find this enormously refreshing.
You won't wear these out of the home, you may even feel guilty about wearing in front of a loved one, or anyone, but put them on and nothing else matters,
If you look in the mirror you will laugh, or I did, maybe the free laughs are a hidden extra.
The world of psycho-acoustics tells us that being happier makes music sound better, so maybe Grado are on to something.
 
Could future headphones come with a joke book?
 
 
Sound.
This is it. For me anyway, nothing else matters, portable hifi doesn't require the “Wife Approval Factor” unlike the world of home hifi.
A few years ago I sold HiFi for a brief while in a Hi End shop in London. This particular place did have a particularly “well to do” clientel,
even so it was abundantly clear that the way boxes looked in peoples homes was incredibly important.
 
All HiFi manufacturers have this compromise they must meet, those who want to sell do anyway. This has resulted in products like tall slim floorstanding speakers,
that frankly sound awful, but they tick a lot of WAF boxes.
 
Luckily in the wonderful world of Head-Fi, we don't have this hurdle to jump over.
Of course some here value design and form very highly indeed, but for me and I guess loads of others, especially people with good 2 channel systems at home,
it's the audio quality that matters.
 
These Grado's are for home use only, the customer buying these won't be upgrading from Apple buds. They will probably already have a decent HiFi at home. 
 
The source to be used with these is an interesting subject in itself.
The default answer is a high end amp/dac, probably valves included somewhere, but with DAPs getting better and better, there is no reason why you can't sit at home
in any room you like if you have a DAP worthy.
 
If my 30 odd years being an audiophile has taught me anything, it's that Source First really is correct. Garbage in, Garbage out, etc – this is especially true for home HiFi and after a few years on Head Fi, I have still seen nothing to change my mind. So I believe this is true for Head-Fi also.
 
So plugging a £300 DAP or phone into these is going to get you nowhere, it's just going to show up the limitations of the source, for a start most won't drive them.
They certainly need a good amp to get them going,
 
I did have a lot of success driving these with my 901 and mini box, and most others I got to listen to also used this. I did have to turn up the HiFiMan more than ever before,
but this wasn't just to be louder.......oh no.
 
The GS1000e had a beautiful delicate presentation of the music, reminding me a lot of Quad electrostatics.
The are in charge of the music, and stamp their authority onthe sound. The sound is so inviting you want to turn it up more, another good sign from my Hi-Fi retail days.
These need, warrant and deserve better than any DAP can throw at them.
 
So the main source I used was my Audiolab M-DAC, (full system at bottom), it's seems like
a bargain these days but the superb implementation of the ESS9018 DACs and flat headphone amp that I find a great test for any headphones.
My main open cans at home are HD600s, I have had them for 15 years and still love them, either with my M-Dac or my X-Cans (both stock btw),
and I've never really felt the urge to upgrade.
 
Unfortunately this has now changed, I am not getting paid for this review, I have not been offered these at a discount or free (bugger), and in a way I wish I'd never heard them, but I am delighted I did.
 
I don't buy audio because of measurements, I look at the Headroom graph and I see a bumped bass around 100hz and a treble peak at about 8000hz.
I did not hear this at all.
 
The best word I can find to describe the sound is natural. The sound is effortless, it urges you to turn up to hear more, however even at low volumes the music is all there.
They definitely made my Sennheisers sound coloured in a way I had never noticed before.
 
Starting with something acoustic, (16/44 flac copy of my CD), Neil Youngs Unplugged was just lush beyond words, I was swimming in the music, the guitars sounded beautiful,
and the brushes on the snare had depth and texture. Neil's voice was presented perfectly. I can't fault this.
 
Next something not audiophile, Jason Falkner's sublime Author Unknown CD, early 90s, quite harsh, probably digital recording.
Whilst the Grados are very revealing, they are not overly harsh with this guitar based recording, on the wrong system this can give you a headache after a while,
but on these Grados I could listen forever, to what is probably my favourite album ever.
 
The sound is flat, but never brittle almost like listening through a very good valve amp, just a hint of lushness.
 
Next was a staple Hi-Fi dem disc of mine, Love in Vain from the SACD/DSD remaster of the Rolling Stones Let it Bleed.
This starts with some great sounding acoustic guitar, Mick’s voice sounds as rough as it should, then Charlie's snare kicks in, and it gets you.
In the heart though, not in the gut like a floorstanding speaker would, or indeed the HD600s.
DSC_0047.jpg
super talented band member Kev, loved them, 
 
Something in the bass was lacking, or was it? Was I just used to the colouration of my HD600s?
 
As ever I turn to other ears, ears I trust.
So I take along my 901 with Grados to a band rehearsal (I have a Northern Soul Covers band) – I get some great ears and and some younger ears to have a listen.
 
First up – Billy Jean DFF/DSD from Thriller SACD.
The intro alone is enough to tell me almost everything I need to know about any system.
It is inherently a great recording , but has a nasty digital haze across it, the thinness of the sound was fashionable in the early 80s.
Being a band we are of course music snobs, so the look on their faces when I suggested Billy Jean as a first listen to a £2k (ish) portable system, surprised them to say the least.
 
About 13 seconds is all it takes – on a good system, it works every time.
Have a listen, even the old CD sounds great. It's a great track for comparison because everyone knows it, but few people have heard it properly! No-one thought the bass
was light, just correct.
 
They all loved the sound, and they remarked less about the looks than I expected, they drooled over the dreamy wooden cups, but the price did raise an eye brow or two.
 
Back home – I thought I'd try it with my X-Cans, so played some records on the old fruit box. 
The MFSL pressing of Exodus really showed of the bass capabilities of the GS1000e, deep, fruity but not over powering.
 
Another MFSL pressing, this time Muddy Waters Folk Singer, one the finest sounding records ever made, and it sounded incredible, the details
all over the recording were vivid, The foot stomping, the coughs, it's all there.
 
Muddy's voice was captured in a way I don't think I have ever heard, on any system.
 
The Grados seemed delighted to be matched with the X-Cans. The little amp that keeps on giving.
 
Back to digital, and 24/44 of The Beatles shone on these headphones.
Here and at other times, I simply forgot I was wearing headphones, the music was all there and correct the details at times wondrous, 
Bits of Sgt Pepper I had never heard before, I love hearing new things in music that I love.
 
The Grados gave me that.
 
If I could I would buy them. I can't say more than that. The only downside is having the time at home to listen to them.
 
HD600s were glad to see the back them. I had a quick listen, and damn the colourations were still there!
 
The quirky looks don't bother me, they are super comfy, (I have big head and glasses)
They are the best headphones I have had at home by far.
 
Systems used
HiFiMan HM-901 with minibox
 
Dell XPS I7 desktop, Win 10, wasapi Foobar , Audiolab M-DAC
Linn LP12/Lingo/Ekos/Lyra Clavis DC/Linto
Prima Luna Prologue 2 integrated amp
Rogers LS5/9
 
Footnote
Since I had these I caught a cold, that turned into an ear infection,that resulted in a constant buzzing
sound on my left ear drum, the infection has gone, the buzzing hasn't, been about three weeks now, I already had high pitched tinnitus,that was only occasional, but this is constant, never stops.
GP has no solutions, it is HORRIFIC. I mean last year I survived cancer and now this, this year, I am quite angry about it, music truly is my life. So listening to music is something I can't do, pretty devastating, I was hoping it would clear up by now, but it hasn't – the GS1000e may be the last headphone I ever listened to ! - but not a bad way to go out.
I have a couple more reviews to write then that's it, unless a miracle happens.
Amictus
Amictus
And, FWIW, I'm also a London resident and owner of SR60i, an RS-1i/e hybrid and a PS500. I have some other cans, of course. I heard the GS1000e at the London Canjam out of the Chord TT and thought ´no bass!', but the conditions weren't ideal...
  • Like
Reactions: junk88
headfry
headfry
hello, in reading your review I was struck by your comparison to the GS1000e's to Quads, here's a quote from my post Dec 2 2015:
 
Grado's GS1000 or GS1000i? - Page 2
 
 
...."My other Grados are nice but give by comparison a somewhat simplified "view" through a much smaller window, with various 
aspects obscured or compressed to give the effect of listening to a good pair of bookshelf speakers through a good system. The 1000i's remind me of listening to modern Quad electrostatics
- everything is just there, full life size and full bodied, warm, 100% believable, exciting....and utterly captivating."
headfry
headfry
I'd like to add that I'm a low volume Grado lover as well, the GS1000's may be the best low volume phones ever! I also lightly eq my 1000i's to slightly boost the mids.

KT66

Headphoneus Supremus
Pros: See review
Cons: See review
WP_20140226_007.jpgWP_20140226_001.jpg
 
 
This review is based on the brief time I had the X5 as part of the UK tour.
 
I am not going in the facts, like spec, what's in the box etc, we all know that by now.
 
This is all my personal opinion and you should try to listen to anything yourself before buying.
All our ears are different.
 
Me
46 year old – amateur musician for 32 years, audiophile for 20 years. I think I know
two channel audio pretty well, I have worked in Hi-End audio retail,and I certainly know how an instrument, especially guitars and drums are meant to sound.
Loves Rickenbackers, Gretsch Drums, Vox amps, LP12s, Quad Electrostatics and BBC speakers.
 
 
Equipment Used with X5 and in comparison
 
Hisoundaudio 3rd Anniversary.
Hifiman - HM-801
Linn Ikemi CD player
 
Audio Technica ATH-ES10 (ESW9 pads)
Beyerdynamic DT1350
Denon AH-D2000
Sennheiser HD600
 
My 801 developed faults about a month before the X5 arrived, so I used my Studio 3rd
for that period until I received the X5. So both other DAPs were still quite fresh in my memory.
 
When I first received it, it was already charged, and very simple plug and play.
I plugged into my Dell Precision M4700 (Win7 64 bit) at work and there were no issues.
I find Fiio quite brilliant at this. You KNOW that when a lovely FIIO box arrives it will work.
I have E7, E07k, E17 and G01 guitar amp, and they've all been easy to use, and reliable.
If only the same could be said for others.
 
So I've the X5 in my hand, it's big, wider than my Iphone5, it feels good and weighty in my hand,
however I have very very big hands, so I am not too sure how others would feel, it could seem
a bit large.
 
I transfer some music with drag and drop, there is no internal memory so you have to use a mico SD card, I used a Samsung 32g class 4, that I had in my Studio 3rd. Of course the first thing I put on
is some 24/192 files. This is the first DAP I have had that plays over 24/96, and this was my main
reason for showing interest in the first place.
 
After ejecting safely I turn it on and am completely bemused!. I can't seem to move the cursor.
I show it to a younger MAC friendly colleague at work, and he instantly spots the wheel and shows me. I have never used an Ipod so this was not intuitive to me.
So panic over and I plug in my ES10s
UURGGGGGHH – horrible. BUT I know it's not the DAP. I have had the ES10s for 2 months
now and the X5 confirmed that I just don't like them.
Ridiculous bass and veiled treble. I often wonder if they are fakes, yet they are beautifully built and others who I lend them to like them.
WP_20140226_008.jpgWP_20140226_010.jpg
 
Back to the trusty DT1350. That's more like it.
Real world bass, beautiful midrange and treble.
 
Lots of treble.
On certain recordings there is no doubt I found the combo of X5/DT1350 a little
overly bright, like there is a spotlight on the treble. Sometimes I really like this as the detail
on the X5 is fabulous, the best I have heard on any DAP.
 
I am a detail freak, I think a lot of musicians are. I love hearing more, whether it was Beatles
24/44 flac, Rolling Stones 24/192 or WAVs of Jason Falkner and Michael Head I heard more detail
than ever. I was delighted as this.
Due to the short time I can't really say if part of the extra detail is due to the brightness or not. The match with D2000s was the best, I could have listened to that for a long long time without needing to upgrade a thing.
 
I have a Voyager and O2 but used the X5 only as a DAP, after all I was looking for a one box
replacement for my 801. I did find on better masterings, with high dynamic range like Mobile Fidelity and DCC that I had to have the volume at 85-90 with my DT1350s. I don't normally have to turn any amp up that hard, and I am no headbanger.
With other more modern compressed recordingsI had the volume at 65-75 – a bit more acceptable. Unlike others here I find the DX50 to have more power, but that of course is not what's important.
 
I found the battery life to be very good, I didn't measure it but definitely better than the 801, and its so easy to charge via USB, unlike other DAPs where you need a unique charger, this used to drive me mad about my HM-601 and HM-801
 
It's my birthday soon, it's fabulous value and I may ask for one.
I wish I had more time with it, and got to try it with the Voyager (that may have tamed the brightness a bit) I need to find out more about the X90, then the X7 might come out, or I might get my 801 repaired or exchange it for a 901 – choices, choices, this are very very exciting times in the world of personal audio, golden days. And the X5 adds to that perfectly
 
So to summarise
 
  1. Great Build
  2. Works Flawlessly
  3. Superb Value
  4. Plays Hi-Res beautifully
  5. Amazing details, you will hear things you haven't heard before
  6. Dual USB slots
  7. Proper Line Out
  8.  
    Firmware easy to change
 
My only criticisms (that don't seem to agree with anyone else's here!)
  1. Maybe a bit bright with certain headphones.
  2. I don't like the X controls on the front. Though I guess I would get used to it after time.
  3. Headphone amp could be a bit more powerful.
KT66
KT66
peareye- I don't use EQ at all, ever.
real old purist I am afraid.
I have a 901 now, that's game over, marvellous
Until it breaks or I break it!
peareye
peareye
hi kt66...by the way, i do have a great pair of kt66 monoblocks from the 1950's by Pilot!
 
the 901 does seem to break the bank...how different is it? i am selling off my other players to see what i can afford...also, how is the UI? i was so used to the sony players, it made it simple for me....I find both x3 & x5 very frustrating because if i leave the now playing screen - to say change the bass level, i cannot just return straight to it, i have to go back to the first page and try and find my way....not very good when i am walking!!!
KT66
KT66
The UI is not perfect but it works well, and is easy to use..
I have lots of Quad II mono blocks!
None of these new DAPs are good for walking with.
I still use my Studio 3rd when walking.
 
I think the 901 could be worth the extra money, but I have not heard the DX90 yet.
Back
Top