Shozy P20
Planar
$144


Before I begin this review let me first thank Linsoul for providing me the Shozy P20 for this review, rest assured, my review will always be100% my own personal opinion.
You can get the Shozy P20 here :
https://www.linsoul.com/products/shozy-p20


Unboxing

Build Quality

Shozy P20 shell is made from metal, probably aluminum because it is light weight.
The faceplate itself has a very cool looking pattern.

As for the cable there is two options for you to choose, 3.5mm or 4.4mm termination, the cable itself is fine, nothing fancy but it works.

Comfort
The Shozy P20 on my ears is very comfortable thanks to its “normal” IEM design and its lightweight body.


Sound

Tested using FIIO M23, KB3
Music from Apple Music (J-POP, J-Rock, EDM, Rap, Metal, Jazz, Anisong, K-POP)

Tonality in General : Mild V-Shape

Bass : The bass has satisfying quantity and quality, the sub-bass is boosted to around harman target quantity, but it has extra mid bass so overall bass is thick and punchy.
EDM song sounds really satisfying on this set, though the P20 bass speed is also speedy enough for metal genre, or any genre to be honest.

Midrange : slightly recessed upper midrange, it makes overall midrange sound a bit distant and free from shout, there is no sibilance either on the vocal which is good.

Overall midrange presentation is like really relaxed on this set, so if you're fan of a relaxed midrange presentation this might be the set for you.

Treble : Sparkly, it has some extra boost around mid treble region, it never sounds too intense, it just add more air and sparkle to the overall sound and make overall treble region sounds more detailed.

Technicality
Very Good for $144

Stage : Mid Sized
Not really wide but not small either, it has symmetrical shape on the width – depth and very good stage layering

Detail Retrieval : Very Good
Especially on the treble region, probably thanks to the treble quantity boost the P20 has.

Imaging : Very Good
If I have to describe the imaging of the P20, it sounds like you're inside a blob of void and sound is coming from nowhere, its really good, though for imaging is also depending on your source.

Separation and Positioning : Very Good
Tested for gaming (Valorant) the P20has really good sound separation and positioning, I can clearly hear gun shots separated from the foot steps, which is what you want for a competitive FPS shooter.

As for music use, its also very good ,no problem and complaint at all from me.

Conclusion

Is the Shozy P20 worth it?

Absolutely, it has a very good Mild V-Shape tuning without sounding too bassy or too sparkly, if I had to put it into word, its just like Mild V-Shape done right.

Not only that, the technicality on this set is very good for the asking price of $144

The only thing I wish Shozy could improve is the unboxing experience, such as the packaging, but other than that, yeah its worth your $144 for sure.

Thanks for reaching this far,


Just in case you're Indonesian or understand Bahasa Indonesia, you can watch the P20 review here


-littlenezt.

FX-Audio- DR07
Dual AK4493
$170

Before I start this review, let me first thank HiFiGO for providing this unit in for review.

Rest assured my review is 100% my own personal opinion.
Just in case you're interested on getting this DAC – AMP, you can get it on the link below.
https://hifigo.com/products/fx-audio-dr07

Unboxing
Build Quality
The DAC-AMP itself is made from metal, very solid build quality.

The DR07 also has a small screen that shows information such as format, resolution, gain, input, and volume.

Front of the device you can find a power / input selection button, 3.5mm and 6.3mm port.
To access the menu such as gain, filters, you can use the volume knob by holding it for a few seconds.

The remote itself is made from plastic and its just meh, I also to be honest don't know what the EQ, AMP,DAC, Player button for because I mainly use the DR07 with my PC, not with other source and there is nothing mentioned on the manual either.

On the back of the device there is BT-Ant port, USB IN, OPT IN, COAX IN, OPT Out, Line Out and DC 12v In.

One thing I should let you guys know that the DR07 runs HOT after one hour of usage.

The device also supports features such as :

• MQA Decoder
• Bluetooth LDAC

Power
Rated for 1100mw di 32ohm.

Sound
Tonality : Neutral - Analytical

Bass : Snappy and Well Controlled
DR07 offers a tight, snappy, no coloration, and very great bass control tested using the HD650.
The somewhat sluggish bass of the HD650 when plugged in to the DR07, it becomes a bit snappier than usual, though in other hands, if you pair the DR07 with a very fast decay bass IEM / Headphone, lets say a planar unit, the bass might come as a bit too snappy and short decayed.

Midrange : Neutrality
The DR07 doesn't add anything to the midrange, in other words, it sounds “transparent” and honest.
It doesn't add extra note weight to the sound either, so I guess for some people the DR07 actually can be sound a bit analytical rather than having more emotions and musicality.

Treble : Extended and Airy
It looks like the DR07 has some kind of highlight on the treble section, tested using my HD650, the HD650 darker treble seems to be getting brighter a bit, not by much but its noticeable.
The decay of treble is somewhat accented as well, it sounds longer than usual, so it gives extra sense of details.

Technicality
Very Good for $170

Stage : Very Good
Reasonably Wide.
It makes the HD650 sounds a bit wider lets say compared to my audio interface (Scarlett 2i2 4th Gen), it also has proper stage layering.

Imaging : Very Good
It has no problem rendering holographical information to my HD650, though if you plug lets say a Moondrop Chu 2 as I usually test my imaging, the DR07 will make it sound almost holographical but not quite there yet, but its not 2.5D sounding either.

Separation and Positioning : Very Good
No problem or complaints from me, it has very good separation and positioning due to the fact its tonality is well controlled and more towards analytical one.

Detail Retrieval : Very Good
It has superb treble detail and decay, resolving midrange with normal decay, good bass detail but with a bit shorter decay.
*What I mean by the decay is like very short layer of lingering sounds from your music.
Or in other words, very good treble detail, good midrange detail and above average bass detail.

Conclusion
Do I recommend the FX-Audio- DR07 ?

Absolutely, its one of the better value DAC-AMP combo that you can get on the market right now especially if you're in search for a neutral – analytical sounding DAC-AMP combo.

You get a lot from $170 USD you spend, you get a well spec components, bluetooth functionality, High power output, neutral – analytical sound with very good technicality on board.

Thanks for reaching this far.

Just in case you're Indonesian or understand Bahasa Indonesia, you can watch video version of this review here


-littlenezt.

FIIO M23
AK4499 EX + AK4191EQ & THX AAA 78+
$700


Before I start this review, let me thank FIIO for providing the unit in for review, rest assured my review is 100% my own personal opinion.

You can check the M23 here
https://www.fiio.com/m23


Unboxing
What you get inside the box :

• DAP
• Micro SD Ejector
• Included Silicone Case
• USB C to C Cable
• Type C to A Adapter
• Manual & Documents

Build Quality

The M23 screen size is 5.5inch with1440 x 720p resolution, it looks good for a DAP, but not smartphone like good, if you know what I mean.

The M23 comes with a tempered glass screen protector and silicone case pre-applied from the factory.

I believe there are 2 variants of material type for the M23, stainless steel and aluminium one, the one I have right now is the aluminium one.
For the stainless steel version, you get a leather case instead of silicone case.

Left side of the M23 has a touch sensitive volume that can be enabled-disabled and also traditional clicking volume control.

Personally myself disable the touch sensitive one because I don't want to accidentally blast my ears with loud music if I accidentally swipe up the touch sensitive button.

There is also a power button with LED and multifunction button that u can map its function on the left side of the DAP.


On the right side, there is a rewind, play, forward button, Desktop Mode switch and hold / button lock switch.

On the above, there is 4.4mm and 3.5mm port

On the below there is a micro sd slot, USB in and power in port.

For charging, I suggest to use the power in port, because it is more faster compared to the USB in one.

Back side of the M23



Specs

Power & Desktop Mode

with high gain the M23 can give you 475mw @32ohm and 55mw @300ohm, this is actually already quite high power to be honest, but if you really want to push lets say low sensitivity high impedance headphone, you can use the super high gain accessible using the desktop mode, it can provide up to 1000mw @32ohmand 240mw @300ohm, both figures is for the 4.4mm port.

Also desktop mode make it safe to plug your M23 as a desktop unit.
It basically bypass the battery charging system, and completely power the M23 using the power in port, so your battery will be safe.

Battery Life

I get around 9.5 hours of battery life from the 4.4mm port using a planar IEM.
The M23 also supports 30w power delivery charging, it charges quite fast actually to the 80%, around 1 hour.
But 80% above take quite long time.


Input / Mode selection

There is an option for Android Mode, Pure Music Mode, Air Play, USB DAC Mode, Bluetooth Receiving Mode, and Roon Ready.
To be honest with you I rarely touch any mode besides the Android Mode.
Oh also one thing I would like to mention, the M23 can get a bit warm to the touch after several hours of use.

Sound
Neutral – Warm

Bass : Full, Deep, and Well Extended
I felt like the bass has some kind of highlight on its presentation.
It has that dense feeling into it, like there is this weighty feeling to the bass sounds so it renders object very well.

Midrange : Lush, Weighty, Relaxed
The presentation of M23 midrange is just like the typical signature sound of AK4499EX + AK4191EQ implemented on all FIIO's product
Just like Q15, K9 AKM, I praised it because how natural and lush the midrange presentation, and same with the M23, I love it.
It renders midrange in an elegant way, good note weight, lush, and relaxed yet natural, musical and yet very resolving at the same time.

Though if you wanted a more aggressive presentation, the M23 / Q15 / K9 AKM might not be the device for you.

Treble : Smooth, Extended, Very Detailed
The treble presentation of FIIO M23 is smooth, complementing the lush presentation of its midrange, but its extended at the same time, and on top of that, its very resolving and detailed.

There is this airy feeling without making your ears tired, and its very good, It can renders micro decay very well, tested even with planar type IEM / headphones.

Usually planar type IEM / headphones at least for me always has that impression of the decay is very short, but not when plugged in to the M23, it has proper decay of sounds ,and I really love it.

Technicalities
for $700 I'd say its “Very Good”
It offers practically almost the same similar technicalities like the K9 AKM but in portable form factor.

Stage : Very Good
Grand and well rendered layering
It sounds expansive just like a desktop unit for real, I don't know how FIIO made it, but yeah it sounds just as expansive as the K9 AKM.

Imaging : Very Good
It can make my trusty cheap Moondrop Chu 2 sounds holographical, no joke.
It rendered sounds very well with many layered information that you can easily image the sounds.

Detail Retrieval : Very Good
The M23 has a very good detail retrieval on all of its frequency (bass – mids – treble)
It sounds very resolving.
The M23 is really a joy to listen to, it sounds relaxed but full of micro details.

Separation and Positioning : Very Good
Thanks to its grand and well rendered layering of the stage, separation and positioning of the M23 is also very good, you can easily pinpoint and separate whatever you want with this DAP.

So basically for the technicality part, I was mind blown when I first tried the M23, because my expectation the M23 would be like below K9 AKM in terms of technicalities but no, Its so close to each other, yes its that good.

Comparison

FIIO Q15
The Q15 is almost like the M23 without operating system and minus THX AAA 78+ amp.
Is it worth it to spend more and get the M23?
In my opinion YES.

The M23 has superior bass control compared to the Q15.
M23 also has this more weighty presentation of the bass and it help renders object to feel more realistic and natural.
As for technicalities, the M23 also take it to the next level, basically what I said in my K9 AKM review applies here.
Its just like Q15 on a steroid, every aspects of the technicalities is noticeably improved.

Conclusion

If you really like the K9 AKM sound and hoping there is a portable version of it then here is your answer and solution for it.

The FIIO M23 is a device that you really can't underestimate.
It offers decent processor, very good screen, and decent battery life, somewhat updated android OS version and the flexibility of desktop mode.
You can literally use the M23 as a desktop unit too if you wish it for.

I can easily recommend the M23 for its price. Trust me, It offers a very good value without touching the $1000 price point.

Just in case you're Indonesian or understand Bahasa Indonesia, you can watch the M23 review video here



Thanks for reaching this far !

-littlenezt.

Kiwi Ears Allegro
ES9038Q2M
$60

Before I start this review, let me thank Linsoul for sending the Kiwi Ears Allegro in for review,
rest assured, my review is 100% my own personal opinion.

You can get this dongle here :
https://www.linsoul.com/products/kiwiears-allegro

Unboxing
Build Quality
The build quality of Kiwi Ears Allegro is actually excellent, its made from aluminum, and the design is inspired by retro controller, which is a nice touch because it looks unique compared to other dongle on the market.


Power
Rated at 70mw SE, 155mw Balanced @32ohm.
It has enough power to push Sennheiser HD600 to a reasonably loud listening level, though the bass control is not the best I've heard but its decent.
So if you're planning to use this with your IEM, I don't think there will be any problem at all regarding output power.

Battery Consumption
Plugged in to my Redmi Note 13Pro Plus 5G, it drains 1% around every 7 minutes.

Balanced VS Single Ended
Obviously with balanced you get more power, though I do notice somehow the separation and stage size is a bit better with balanced connection. Tonality of both are the same.

Sound
Neutral

Bass : the Allegro has a tight bass presentation, its not highlighting any bass frequency, it is completely neutral.
Though if i must nitpick, Allegro bass presentation is not the deepest that I've heard (compared to more premium dongle / DAP which is kinda expected)

Midrange : Clarity ! When I compared the Allegro to other sources such as the Hidizs S9 Pro Plus Martha, I can feel the Allegro has some highlights on the upper midrange area, making the overall sound much more lively.
Its not much but its noticeable when you do an A-B comparison.

Treble : Sparkly highs, and extended.
Presented in analytical manners probably due to the ESS chip used on the Allegro.

Technicalities
“Good” for $60

Stage : Good
It is decently wide, obviously much more wider than your smartphone or lets say basic budget dongle.
The Allegro also can render stage layering pretty well

Imaging : Good
Lets say if your IEM can do holographic presentation, the Allegro won't limit its potential, but if your IEM can't do holographical, don't expect any miracles from the Allegro to make your IEM suddenly sounds holographical.

Detail Retrieval : Very Good
It has that ESS Sabre analytical sound presentation, for the price actually the Allegro has a “Very Good“ detail retrieval on all frequency (low – highs) though for sure its not the most detailed dongle ever, but even challenging higher price bracket, I can still say the Allegro detail retrieval is “Good”.

Separation & Positioning : Good
It can dissect sounds pretty well actually.
You can easily separate and pinpoint which sound is coming from and I've tested this using the single ended connector with my trusty cheap Moondrop Chu 2, so that says a lot, no problem and complaint at all for the separation & positioning from me.

Comparison

Hidizs S9 Pro Plus Martha ($79 - $90)
It has same ES9038Q2M chip, but does it have any differences?

Actually YES.
The Allegro tonality is somewhat has more clarity and more lively presentation compared to the Martha, I'm not sure if its because of the filters used or different amp / component they used. Because on the Martha, overall tonality is much more neutral, rather than having slight clarity boost on the upper midrange like Allegro.

Technicality wise, Martha beats Allegro on its detail retrieval, Martha simply shows more micro details compared to the Allegro, but that doesn't mean Allegro is bad in any way, the Allegro is simply just cheaper compared to the Martha and thats why on the detail retrieval section of my review, I said even compared to higher price bracket dongle, the Allegro can stand its ground, and I can say the detail retrieval is still “Good”.

One thing the Martha missing is independent volume control, the Allegro has it.

Conclusion

So, is the $60 Kiwi Ears Allegro worth your money?
Yeah of course, the Allegro is one of the better value dongle available on the market right now.

It offers very good build quality, retro controller inspired design, independent volume control and good technicalities for its price.

Thanks for reaching this far,

Just in case you're Indonesian or understand Bahasa Indonesia, you can watch video version of this review here


-littlenezt.

FIIO LL-RC2024 Cable
$79 - $99

Before I even begin this review, let me first thank FIIO for providing the LL-RC2024 cable
Rest assured, my review is 100% my own personal opinion


Unboxing
There is minimal accessories you get from the packaging.

Build Quality

The cable specification itself is made from “High-purity Japanese Furukawa authentic copper material” with “Secondary refining process” with total wire count of 560 total wires.

It has a high quality braided nylon protective sheath.

It has modular 3.5mm and 4.4mm plug.

Sound - Comparation

FIIO stated in their website about “Differences in listening experience” the LL-RC2024 compared to stock FT3 / FT5 cable, it will “improves the resolution of high-frequencies, making an overall brighter and clearer sound performance, vocals more close to ears while improving mids density with clearer imaging.”

Though in my own experiences, I'm really having a hard times distinguishing the differences between the stock FT3 cable vs LL-RC2024, one thing I noticed is that the separation and stage sizes seems like to broaden up a bit with the LL-RC2024, I don't know if this is a placebo effect or not, but I feel the stage is somewhat broaden up a little bit compared to the stock FT3 cable and thanks to that, the separation is also somewhat improved.


What about compared with different cable?
Well, actually I have compared the LL-RC2024 cable to stock Aune AR5000 cable (I compared both with 3.5mm plug to be fair), there is no tonal differences but again with the LL-RC2024 cable, I feel like the technicalities somewhat improved.

It feels like the stage is getting broaden up again and the separation is getting better thanks to the broaden up soundstage.

So yeah that's pretty much sums up the differences I can notice / feel with the LL-RC2024 cable.

Conclusion

So is the LL-RC2024 worth your money?

It depends, actually if you have FT3 / FT5 and feels like the stock cable is too long (3M) yeah it's kinda worth it to get the LL-RC2024 1.5M variant.

Not only that, lets say you do need a modular / balanced 4.4mm cable for your dual 3.5mm headphones such as Aune AR5000 / Hifiman Sundara, you can get the LL-RC2024 to get the modular balanced cable to improve your overall listening experience such as to get the balanced vs SE improvement and more.


The cable itself is not that pricey for the high quality material being used and I kinda notice the technicalities especially the stage, separation and dynamic is a bit better compared to stock FT3 and Aune AR5000 stock cable.

Thanks for reaching this far !

Just in case you're Indonesian or understand Bahasa Indonesia, you can watch the review of this cable here


-littlenezt

QKZ x HBB Hades
2x LCP DD
$50

Before I begin this review, let me thank Linsoul for sending the QKZ x HBB Hades in for review.
Rest assured, this review is 100% my own personal opinion.

Just in case you're interested on getting the Hades, you can get it from the link below :
https://www.linsoul.com/products/qkz-x-hbb-hades

Unboxing
Inside the box you get :

• IEM
• Cable
• Coin?
• Eartips
• Plastic Case

Build Quality
is fine, QKZ state that the Hades is 3D printed or something, so I guess the body is made from resin. It is also very lightweight.

The shell shape kinda reminds me the Truthear Zero and Zero Red.

Though on the Hades, it has some interesting design, transparent faceplate and translucent main shell.

As for the cable, its usable, though the earhook is super annoying not gonna lie.

Comfort
Despites the annoying earhooks, I can get a good seal and no hot spots while using the QKZ x HBB Hades.

Sound

Tested using Kiwi Ears Allegro, Stock Cable, Stock Eartips
Music is mostly from Apple Music (J-Pop, J-Rock, K-Pop, EDM, Rap, Metal, Jazz, Anisong)

Tonality in General : Bass Boosted

Bass : Really big, bold and thumpy, the quantity is boosted quite a lot too, it definitely will satisfy any bass heads out there.

Bass speed is on the slower side, it struggles to keep up with metal / double pedal music.
Though for genre like EDM, or pop, it will be a very fun bass to listen to.

Midrange : Recessed, could sound a bit muffled at times.
Vocal and instruments both sounds thick and the placement is on the back behind the bass.

So if you're looking for a forward midrange presentation, this IEM is NOT for you.

Treble : Smooth, normal extension, average details.
The Hades is definitely a very bass focused IEM, the treble is smooth and not offensive at all.

Technicalities
For a $50 USD IEM the technicalities is Average

Stage : Medium sized, it has symmetrical width – depth, but average at best stage layering.

Detail Retrieval : Average, just enough details to not make the overall sound dull.

Imaging : 2.5D sounding, definitely not holographic but not bad either.

Positioning and Separation : Average, it sounds OK, definitely not the most sharp positioning and separation, but its still usable / passable for me.

Comparation

KZ Symphony : V-Shaped, not as bassy as Hades, though the Symphony has aggressive and intense treble.
The technicalities of Symphony is a lot better compared to Hades on all aspects.
Though if you're really looking for a bass head IEM, the Hades is the one to pick.

Conclusion

Is the QKZ x HBB Hades worth it?

It depends.

If you really want a bass head IEM, then yeah, why not grab the Hades, It probably has the most polarizing tuning IEM for its price, like no IEM around this price sounds so bassy like the Hades.

Though keep in mind, the technicalities is just average at best.

Thanks for reaching this far !

Just in case you're Indonesian or understand Bahasa Indonesia, you can watch the review of Hades here


-littlenezt.

KZ Symphony
1DD + 1Planar
$59

Before I begin this review, let me thank KZ for sending the Symphony in for review.
Rest assured, my review is 100% my own personal opinion.
Just in case you're interested on getting this IEM, you can get it here
https://www.kztws.com/products/kz-symphony

Unboxing
Build Quality

The faceplate is from metal, it looks kinda open, but I'm not sure if its really open or only just for aesthetics.
While the main shell is made from plastic, it is a decent feeling plastic.

Cable is just MEH.
It is the KZ "bihun" cable, its usable but c'mon...

Comfort
Despite its large shell, I can wear the Symphony for long listening session no problem, though maybe if you have smaller, you might get some comfort issues.

Sound

Tested using FIIO M23, Kiwi Ears Allegro, Stock Cable, Stock Eartips
Music is mostly from Apple Music (J-Pop, J-Rock, K-Pop, EDM, Rap, Metal, Jazz)

Tonality in General : V-Shaped
Bass has strong bass boost, ranging from sub bass to around 300hz
Bass presentation is pretty bold, thick and full bodied.

Bass speed is normal, not that fast but not slow either, it still can be used with double pedal music, but for that kind of genre, I think the bass quantity is a bit too much.

Midrange is a bit weird here, the lower part is scooped out while the upper midrange is a bit boosted, it gives sense of spaciousness and clarity but at the same time it makes the overall body a bit thin.

Some vocal can get a bit sibilant from the treble boost, not all vocal but sometime its there.
Thankfully the vocal is not shouty.
While instrument sounds a bit intense, has good clarity but thin on the body.

Treble is boosted around mid treble area, its sounds sparkly, airy, forward and can be intense at times.
Though due to its boost and the planar driver used, it feels like the treble has superb detail retrieval, but in cost of the forwardness.

Technicalities
For its price, I can say the technicalities is very good.

Stage : Stage layering is decent / good.
Stage size is on the large side, also symmetrical in shape (width – depth).

Imaging : Good.
with the FIIO M23, it sounds holographic no joke, but with inferior source such as Kiwi Ears Allegro, it sounds 2.5D sounding to my ears.

Detail Retrieval : Very Good.
It has lots of textures and micro details, especially on the treble region (well probably thanks to its boosts and forwardness)

Positioning and Separation : Very Good.
Thanks to its large stage size, positioning an object and separating them is a breeze, tested on music and games (Valorant).

Conclusion

Is the KZ Symphony worth it?

YES, kind of.
If you're looking for an aggresive V-Shaped tuning profile then yeah sure go ahead grab this IEM.
It has bold satisfying bass and forward treble BUT with very good detail retrieval.

The only concern or nitpick I can give to the Symphony is that the shell is somewhat very large, so if you have smaller sized ears, the Symphony might not fit your ears.

thanks for reaching this far !

Just in case you're Indonesian or understand Bahasa Indonesia, you can check the video review of Symphony here


-littlenezt.

AFUL MagicOne
1BA
$99 - $139

Before I begin this review, let me thank HiFiGO for sending the AFUL MagicOne in for review.
Rest assured, my review will always be 100% my own personal opinion.

Just in case you're interested on getting the MagicOne, you can get it on HiFiGO websites.
https://hifigo.com/products/aful-magicone

Not only that, HiFiGO now are currently on a Spring Sale, there are lots of good items that are on a discount check it out for yourself.

Unboxing

Build Quality


The shell made from full resin, not a hollowed one, It is very clear and free of bubbles / imperfection.

The faceplate is also inspired from a snowflakes.

One thing that are very eye catching is the Nautilus Inspired Resonator.

By the way the MagicOne is a vented BA, BUT it still has some kind of vacuum sensation when you wear the MagicOne in you ears.

Cable is very good, It has options to select, a standard 3.5mm or 4.4mm balanced.

Comfort

is very good despite the slight vacuum effects.


Sound

Tested using : FIIO M23, Kiwi Ears Allegro, Stock Cable, Stock Eartips
Music is mostly from Apple Music (J-POP, J-Rock, K-POP, Anisong, EDM, Metal, Rap, Jazz)
Tonality in General : Bass Boosted Neutral

Bass : The MagicOne bass presentation is somewhat mind blowing for a single BA design, probably thanks to its proprietary “Nautilus Resonator” tested on EDM music, the MagicOne has a full bodied bass punch not like your typical BA bass.
If I must describe the bass, it sounds almost like a planar bass rather than BA / DD bass, it is snappy, speedy, but has physicallity and body.


The bass quantity is not that boosted though, definitely won't satisfy bass heads.
The bass itself is boosted from sub bass to near mid bass, but it has a really clean transition to the midrange.

Midrange : Midrange is somewhat presented in a bit leaner manner. Not much but at least for my ears it's noticeable.
The midrange itself is very nice in terms of resolving capabilities and very musical.

Vocal sounds very detailed without getting too intense and shouty. Not only that, vocal is free from sibilance.
While instruments sounds intense and lively.

Overall timbre of the MagicOne is very spectacular for a BA IEM. It does not sound like a BA IEM at all.

Treble : is smooth and extended, it hasdecent micro details and resolving capabilities, again very good fora single BA IEM.

Usually for a single BA IEM, you must compromise either you want to focus on bass, midrange, or treble, but with the MagicOne, you can have it all, good bass, musical midrange, and extended treble.
I'm genuinely impressed by the MagicOne Tonality.

Technicalities
For a $139 USD Single BA IEM, I can say the MagicOne have a “Good” technicalities.


Stage : Medium sized
it has very good layering and object placement.
The shape of the stage is also symmetrical in terms of width and depth.

Imaging : Good
With the M23, the MagicOne has a unique imaging presentation, it sounds like sounds are popping out of void.
With the Kiwi Ears Allegro, theMagicOne sounds 2.5D to my ears.

Detail Retrieval : Good
The MagicOne is a very resolving IEM, it has textures on its bass, midrange, and treble.
Though if I must nitpick, the layering of the treble is just average, not like your more expensive IEMs with multiple driver OR a premium single DD.

Separation and Positioning : Good
It sounds well separated and the positioning is also very good, I have 0 issues using the MagicOne searching an object position both in music and games.

Comparison

Moondrop Starfield 2

More or less same bass boost, but Starfield 2 has more forward and intense and shouty midrange, the Starfield 2 also has that lean-ness to its sound.
Technicality wise, it is comparable or close.
Though I must give the edge to the MagicOne due to its more resolving capabilities.

Build wise, the MagicOne also better IMO compared to the Starfield 2 due to its full resin compared to the Moondrop painted metal (if you know, you know).

Conclusion

Is the AFUL MagicOne recommended?

YES.

I can easily recommends the MagicOne as a single driver options for sub $150 market.

At first to be honest with you, I was skeptical because it only has single BA, and usually single BA is just meh, both tonality and technicalities.
But not with the MagicOne, it just act like your typical standard single driver IEMs probably thanks to its Nautilus Resonator with a good technicalities and very good build quality.

Though one thing I must remind you, the MagicOne has some kind of vacuum effect while you wear it in your ears. Not the most annoying and intense vacuum effect but its still noticeable.


Thanks for reaching this far.

Just in case you're Indonesian or understand Bahasa Indonesia, you can watch the review of MagicOne here


-littlenezt.

FIIO FH11
1DD + 1BA
$50

Before I start this review, first let me thank FIIO for providing the FH11 for review.
Rest assured, my review will always be independent no matter what happen.
https://www.fiio.com/fh11

Unboxing
What you get inside the box

• IEM
• Cable
• 2 Type of Eartips
• Manual

Build Quality


The FH11 has a conch inspired shell that looks unique for sure, BUT I don't know why FIIO decided to make the 2pin somewhat proprietary due to its shell design.


Cable is just fine, nothing special, but again I must mention the 2pin of this IEM is somewhat proprietary due to the IEM shell.

Comfort
I have some difficulty at first getting a good seal while using the FH11, But I can get a good seal. Though not as fast as your typical IEMs.

As for comfort, its fine, the shell is still light weight enough and is on the smaller side and does not create any hot spots on my ears.

Sound

Tested using Kiwi Ears Allegro, Stock Cable, Stock Eartips
Music is mostly from Apple Music (J-POP, J-Rock, K-POP, Anisong, EDM, Rap, Metal, Jazz)

Tonality : V-Shaped

Bass : boomy and has a generous bass boost ranging from midbass to sub bass.
The bass presentation is a bit on the slower side, as for the quantity, I think it will suits bass heads just fine.

The bass of FH11 is NOT suitable for metal genre and double pedal IMO because of how generous the boost and rather slow speed of the bass.

Midrange : slightly recessed low midrange with coloration from the mid bass, while the upper midrange is somewhat boosted for extra clarity.
It creates somewhat a recessed feeling but a bit bloated sound on the lower part of the midrange, not very distracting, but its there.

Vocals on the FH11 is a bit bloated because of the mid bass coloration, with good clarity to balance out the bass boost.
Instrument such as violin sounds a bit intense but dry and tad metallic on the FH11, probably due to its BA timbre.

Talking about timbre, the BA timbre of this IEM is somewhat noticeable, not the worst but not great either.

Treble : is sparkly, a bit dry sounding, and on the analytical side, it has good presence, normal extension, and the quantity of the treble is never too much that makes you having a headache.

Technicalities

Stage : Average
A bit on the smaller side, not claustrophobic but small.
It has an oval shape to it, like the depth is more small compared to the width, if that makes any sense to you.

Imaging : Good
2.5D sounding tested using Kiwi Ears Allegro.

Positioning & Separation : Good
Despites the generous bass boost, the FH11 have a decent positioning and separation, I can pinpoint sounds panning out left and right with this IEM no problem, and the sound is not overlapping each other.

Detail Retrieval : Good
The FH11 has a good bass rumbles and treble sparkle that sounds detailed for its price, though one thing to nitpick, the midrange is not that resolving compared to its bass and treble.

Conclusion

Is the FH11 worth it?
It depends.

If you're on the market with $50 USD looking for a fun sounding IEM, then yeah why not consider the FH11.

Though one thing makes me a bit hesitant not giving the “go for it” is just that the 2pin connector is somewhat proprietary due to its shell design. So if you're going to change cable it will be a challenge to find an aftermarket one.

Besides that, the FH11 is actually kinda fun to listen for a short burst time of bassy v-shape session.

Thanks for reaching this far.

Just in case you're Indonesian or understand Bahasa Indonesia, you can watch the review of FH11, here


-littlenezt.

Tipsy x EPZ Star & One
$89
1DD.

Before I even begin this review, let me thank Linsoul for sending the IEM in for review.
Rest assured, my review is always 100% my own personal opinion.
You can get this IEM here : https://www.linsoul.com/products/epz-x-tipsy-star-one
Unboxing

Build Quality

The shell is made from resin, it is very well made and lightweight.
As for the cable its just meh, nothing special, no options for 2.5 or 4.4mm or modular either.

Comfort
The Star & One is comfortable to wear for long listening sessions, I have no issues with it.

Sound

Tested using : FIIO KB3, Stock Eartips, Stock Cable
Music is mostly from Apple Music (J-POP, J-Rock, EDM, Rap, Metal, Jazz, Anisong)

Sound in General : Harman Target

Bass : focused on the sub bass region, deep and rumbly, the bass also has that sense of physicality to it.
Mid bass region is almost in target with Harman tuning style, but the Star & One has a little bit of color on its mid bass, making it has a bit more punch compared to normal Harman Tuned IEMs.

Bass speed is average, it can be used for all kind of genre (all rounder) including double pedal and EDM.

Midrange : Forward just like any Harman target tuned IEM.
Thankfully the Star & One manage to pull the midrange especially vocal to not sound shouty.
Not only that, it is also free from any sibilance or harshness.

Instruments on the Star & One sounds very good actually.
It has clarity and forward – intense quality to it without getting it overdone.
As for overall note weight of the midrange, it is normal, not adding extra weight / emotion but not thin either.

Treble : Smooth
Not the most detailed and extended IEM that I've ever heard, but it is not in any way means bad.
Its just lacking a bit of character to it? Or I should word it probably the Star & One treble is smooth but nothing special. That's it.

Technicalities
Above Average

Stage : Medium Sized, not the widest I've ever heard but not small either.
Thankfully it has exact wall placement and good layer information.

Detail Retrieval : Average, not the most resolving IEMs that I've ever heard.
The bass and midrange resolving capabilities is actually good, its just that the treble sounds just meh, So if you prioritize treble details, this IEM probably not for you.

Imaging : Above Average, it sounds 2.5D at least to my ears.
Not holographic, but not 2D sounding either.

Separation & Positioning : Good.
I don't have any problem locating sound sources using the Star & One, including for music and gaming use.

Comparation

Truthear Hexa
$80 USD
1DD + 3BA

Sounds more detailed and has better overall technicalities compared to the Star & One, with different tuning, well mostly less bass.
Timbre wise, Star & One sounds more natural compared to the Hexa.

Moondrop Aria 2
$89 USD
1DD

Aria 2 has better accessories, while the tonality is a bit different.
Aria 2 has that typical Harman modified sound, with more focused on the mid-bass region compared to the sub-bass.
Technicality wise, it is pretty much on par with the Star & One.
So in this case, if you prefer more sub-bass, pick the Star & One, if you prefer more mid-bass, pick the Aria 2.

Conclusion

Is the Tipsy x EPZ Star & One recommended?

If you're looking for a single driver IEM with good comfort, and lightweight shell and want a more or less Harman Tuned IEM with $89 USD is your maximal budget, then YES, why not.

The Star One is offering another option for you to pick in the super crowded sub $100 USD and it is a good thing,

What Star & One offers to the market compared to competitor it offers good build quality, comfortable wearing experience and somehow higher impedance than normal 1DD with pleasing tonality and timbre.

The only nitpick I would give to the Star One is that I hope the treble resolving capabilities could be better, but that's it, nothing else.

Thanks for reaching this far!

Just in case you're Indonesian or understand Bahasa Indonesia, you can watch review of this IEM here

-littlenezt.

FIIO JH5
1DD + 4BA
$80


Before I even begin this review, let me say my thanks to FIIO for sending the JH5 in for review.
Rest assured, my review will always be 100% my own personal opinion.

Unboxing
Build Quality


The shell is made from resin and the faceplate is metal, it is one of the better build IEM out there for $80 for sure.
As for the cable, it is also very good, though sadly there is no option for 4.4mm or modular cable.

Comfort
Is very good, I don't have any hot-spots while wearing the JH5 for long listening session.

Sound

Tested Using Motu M2, FIIO KB3
Music mostly from Apple Music (J-POP, J-Rock, Anisong, EDM, Rap, Metal, Jazz)
Sound in General : Bass Boosted Neutral

Bass : It has a generous boost, ranging from sub bass – mid bass.
Bass presentation is deep, impactful and dense, like a thick bass, but the quantity is not on a bass head level.

The bass speed is average, It can be use for double pedal music but to be honest for that kind of music the JH5 wont be my top choice since the bass is not the very snappy type.

Midrange : Thick, relaxed.
The midrange got some coloration from the bass boost, it makes the overall midrange sounds a bit thicker than normal, which to be honest I kinda like it.

The coloration makes the midrange sounds thick, syrupy, and lush.
As for the upper midrange, it has a bit late pinna gain, the gain started rising from the 2k region rather than normal style, it makes the sound even more focused on the lower midrange.

As for vocal, it does presented in a more thicker way than normal, not shouty and no sibilance can be heard on the JH5.
As for instruments, It sounds lush and thick rather than forward with intense clarity.

Treble : It sounds smooth but detailed, not the most extended treble I've heard.
The treble has a decent timbre, not very BA thin and surgical ones, but its more on the organic side, which is a very good thing considering the price.

Though one thing I would mention, the layering of the treble is just average for its price, its definitely not basic treble layering like lower priced IEM sounds, but its not full complete treble layering either, so keep your expectation in check.

Technicalities
is “Good” for its price

Stage : is medium sized, not large, not small, it has symmetrical shape (width – depth).
Stage layering is very good for its price, you definitely can hear that the JH5 has multiple layer on the staging, so it sounds more 3D and realistic to listen to.

Imaging : Above average
To be honest as for imaging, I always said it depends on your source, but with the Motu M2 and KB3 I've tested the JH5 with, it sounds, “almost holographic” definitely not 2D sounding.

Detail Retrieval : Above average
It has decent amount of micro details, one thing I must point out is that the decay presentation is just normal, not long, not that short either, myself personally prefer a bit more longer decay presentation so it will sounds more layered.

Positioning and Separation : Good
I have no problem locating a sound source with the JH5, both in music and game (Valorant)

Comparation

Truthear Hexa
1DD + 3BA
$80

Same price, different build and tuning.
Build wise, I much prefer the JH5, since the JH5 uses a more normal resin without any weird rubbery coating.
Looks wise, I prefer the Looks of Hexa, the rather pointy shape of it is more attractive at least for my personal taste.

Accessories is better on the JH5, especially the cable.

As for sound, the Hexa has more polite bass compared to the JH5, it has less mid bass and less lower midrange coloration with normal pinna gain.

The JH5 on the other hand, has more dense, thick, lush presentation compared to Hexa.

As for technicalities, I honestly think Hexa beats the JH5 just a bit, though in cost of sounding more analytical than the thick, syrupy, lush that JH5 has.

Conclusion

is the JH5 recommended / would I recommend the JH5?

Yes of course, for $80 USD the JH5 brings a LOT to the table, such as very good build quality, good accessories, comfortable shell, thick, syrupy, lush sound, with good technicalities for its price.

Though in the end, audio is very subjective and you also need to check your own personal preferences.
I'm here just helping you guys to give more reference on how the JH5 sounds on the internet.

Thanks for reaching this far,

Just in case you're Indonesian or understand Bahasa Indonesia, you can watch the review of JH5 here


-littlenezt.

Hidizs SD2
ES9270
$39 / $32 first 200pcs.

Before I even start this review, let me first say my thanks to Hidizs for sending me the SD2 in for review.
Rest assured, my review is as always 100% my own personal opinion and Hidizs has no input at all on the review.

Just in case you want to support me, you can get the Hidizs SD2 on this affiliated link below :
http://tinyurl.com/littleneztsd2
Discount Code / Coupon : LITTLENEZT
Amazon (Non Affiliated) : https://www.amazon.com/dp/B09G9YMHV5

Unboxing
Build Quality

The SD2 is made in from aluminum alloy+ resin material, it is very light weighing at only 6 gram and compact, but it only has 3.5mm port (supports microphone).
The build is fine, not the most premium feeling dongle, especially compared directly to FIIO KA11.
There is also a small LED sample rate indicator on the front of the device.
Also for the looks, its uhh.... mecha-ish, to be honest im not a fan of the looks but hey, it's subjective I guess.

Power & Battery Consumption

The SD2 is rated for 70mw @32ohm, it is decent, not the most powerful small dongle, but it is decent.
As for Its battery consumption, it is very efficient, I got 10 minutes only for 1% of my Infinix Zero 30 5G battery.

Sound
Compared to FIIO KA11 for Context.
I would like to describe the SD2 as a neutral sounding devices, not warm, and not bright either and a bit leaning to analytical type of sound.

Bass of the SD2 is neutral and the control is decent, it can displays rumble of your IEM without any problem.

One thing I noticed when I compare the SD2 to the KA11 is that, the SD2 has normal bass punch, but has deeper sub-bass rumble rather than bouncy and boomy bass colored like the KA11.

Midrange of the SD2 is also neutral / transparent, not colored in any way, at least to my ears.

It doesn't try to add more weight nor clarity so it is a pretty honest sounding device.
This thing could be a good or bad thing depending on your preference, if you want a truly honest sounding midrange then yeah it is a good thing, but for example if you want more emotion on your midrange such as extra weight, the SD2 might not be the right fit for you.

Treble of the SD2 is somewhat extended and has good definition, compared to the KA11, I noticed that SD2 offers more “complete” treble presentation. Its like everything is more extended and the layering is also more superior than KA11.

Technicalities

Stage is very good, its wide, wider than KA11, you can easily tell things is more expanded with the SD2 when you A - B compare it with the KA11

Imaging is good, it has around the same level of the KA11, which is a lot better than your standard smartphone audio.

Separation and Positioning is very good, thanks to the wider stage, object sounds more separated and positioning is more sharp and exact compared to the KA11 and is A LOT better than your smartphone audio.

Detail Retrieval is very good, it has good amount of micro details, a lot more detailed than the smoother type sounds of the KA11.

Don't get me wrong, the SD2 is still sounds “smooth” or probably I should say it as non fatiguing, BUT it has better texture and resolving capabilities than the KA11, probably thanks to the typical analytical sabre sound.


Conclusion
So, is the SD2 any good?

Yeah it is decent for its price. It offers a very compact, lightweight and a lot more detailed sound compared to your smartphone audio.
Not only that, theSD2 is also a very efficient device on its battery consumption.
The only nitpick I can give to the SD2 is that its power is just average, not powerful but not really bad either.


Thanks for reaching this far !

Just in case you're Indonesian or understand Bahasa Indonesia, you can check the video review of this dongle here


-littlenezt.

Kiwi Ears Forteza
2DD + 1BA
$59

Before I even start this review, first let me thank Linsoul for sending me this IEM in for review.
Rest assured, my review as always 100% my own personal opinion.
You can get the Kiwi Ears Forteza here : https://www.linsoul.com/products/kiwi-ears-forteza

Unboxing
Build Quality

The shell is made from hollow resin, it is very ergonomic but a bit on the larger / chunky side.
It is also very lightweight.

While the cable is just OK for its price, its nothing special.

Comfort
The Forteza at least on my ears its one of the most comfortable IEM that I can wear for hours

Sound

Tested using FIIO KB3, Stock Eartips, Stock Cable
Music is mostly from Apple Music (J-POP, K-POP, EDM, RAP, Metal, Jazz)

Tonality in General
V-Shape

Bass : The Forteza has a very satisfying bass IMO, it is full, dense, deep and rumbly.
Bass quantity of the Forteza is boosted quite a lot actually, and I think bass head might love the Forteza bass quantity and quality.

The bass speed is actually can keep up with double pedal songs, but I don't think metal genre and music with double pedal is suitable with the Forteza, it is going to be too intense.

Midrange : Slightly recessed / behind the bass and treble. It sounds a bit lean / thin to my ears.
The midrange while it is a bit recessed and on the leaner / thin side, it is free from shout and sibilance, which is a good thing.
One thing I noticed is that male vocal such as Frank Sinatra losing a bit of its charm because of the leaner / thin midrange presentation.

Treble : Sparkly and a bit forward, complementing the big bass of the Forteza.
It sounds “Sparkly” without being “Spicy”
The treble boost is mainly on mid treble area, so make sure if you allergic to mid treble, the Forteza might not be the IEM for you.

Technicalities
Good

Stage : Good. The Forteza has decent stage size, it is on the larger side for its price range, probably thanks to its V-Shape tuning and sparkly treble.

Stage shape is actually symmetrical in width and depth.

Imaging : Average, nothing special tocomment here, not holographic either.

Detail Retrieval : Above Average, It has decent amount of micro details, especially on the treble area, probably due to its boosted treble creating an illusion of sounding detailed.

Separation and Positioning : Very Good, it has very good separation and positioning despite its big bass. I can easily pinpoint and locate sounds coming from.

Conclusion
Is the Kiwi Ears Forteza any good?

The answer is YES, the Forteza offers a good V-Shape tuning, with a very satisfying deep dense bass that bass lovers would definitely love.

SO, yeah if you're a bass lovers or anyone who wants a fun sounding IEM with a budget around $59 USD, definitely don't skip, or at least check the Kiwi Ears Forteza.

Thanks for reaching this far !

-littlenezt.

FIIO KA11
CS43131 + SGM8262
$30

First of all before I even start this review, let me thank FIIO for sending the KA11 in for review,
rest assured my review is always 100% my own personal opinion.

Unboxing
Build Quality

Build of the KA11 is solid for its price, it has an alluminium shell, it is also super compact and lightweight.

Power & Battery Consumption
The KA11 offers 245mw @16ohm and 200mw @32ohm, pretty powerful for such a small and affordable device.

It also has a very efficient power consumption.
Plugged in to my Infinix Zero 30 5G, it drains 1% for every 9 minutes of playback.

Companion APP
You can change some settings in the FIIO Control APP, such as UAC mode, LED on / off, and filters.
Previously I can change the volume of the device via FIIO Control APP, but somehow now the options is now nowhere to be found, I honestly don't know why.

Sound

Neutral-ish

The KA11 at least to my ears using the stock Minimum phase fast roll-off filter, sounds like a stepped down KA13.
It sounds neutral, having a bit less bouncy bass compared to the KA13.
The overall sound presentation of KA11 is pretty calm, not too analytical, a bit rounded and smooth.

Lets start with the bass.
Bass of the KA11 just as I said earlier, it sounds like KA13 but with less highlight and less bouncy, it still feel a bit more bouncy than your more truly neutral dongle presentation.
The bass has a bit boomy and round feeling to it.

Midrange is neutral, not warm, not bright, not adding extra clarity nor making thing sounds dark.

Treble is a bit smoothed out, positive things about this is that you can use the KA11 for a very long listening session and won't feel tired by listening to it, while the negative side, it sounds like the treble is a bit simplified in away.

Technicality
for context its compared vs plugging directly to POCO M5

Stage is obviously better compared to plugging in directly to smartphone, it has a decently sized stage.

Detail Retrieval is good, again, obviously better than plugging in directy to a smartphone but not as good as the KA13, it feels like a bit simplified in a way (expected because of price difference).

Imaging is average, this device is OK for its price and offer a better imaging than your smartphone audio.

Separation and Positioning is very good, this one is the most different compared to smartphone audio in my opinion. With the KA11, sounds is a lot more separated and positioning is improved a lot, its like having a proper position compared to just 2D flat plane if you know what I mean.


Conclusion
Is the KA11 worth it?

To be honest for its asking price...
Yeah I can recommend the KA11, it offers better audio than your smartphone audio with minimum battery consumption, compact size, and somewhat affordable price.

Its like breathing a new life to your basic smartphone audio.

Thanks for reaching this far !

Just in case you're Indonesian or understand Bahasa Indonesia, you can watch this review here



-littlenezt

Tin HiFi T5S
1DD “nano grade ultra-linear diaphragm”
$130

First of all before I even begin this review, let me thank HiFiGO for sending me this IEM sample in for review.
Rest assured, my review as usual 100% my own personal opinion.

Unboxing
What you get inside the box :

• IEM
• Cable
• Eartips
• Carrying Case
• Tweezer
• Spare Filters
• Cleaning Brush
• Document Card

Build Quality


The T5S is made from alluminum alloy and the shape is somewhat very ergonomic, it has curved shell for more stable fit on your ears.

The shell is still light weight enough for long listening session.

While the cable quality is very good for its price, it is very soft and not easy to get tangled.
The cable I believed it's made from SPC + Copper mixed.
One thing I wish though, I do want an option to pick the termination (2.5mm / 3.5mm /4.4mm).
For now it is shipped with 3.5mm SE only.

Comfort
is very good, itis one of the most comfortable IEM I have wear thanks to its ergonomic and lightweight design.

Sound

Tested using FIIO KB3, FIIO KA11, Stock Eartips, Stock Cable.
Music is mostly from Apple Music (J-POP, J-Rock, RAP, EDM, Jazz, Metal)

Tonality in General : Harman Neutral

Bass is focused on the sub bass region, presentation of the bass is on the musical side of spectrum rather than snappy analytical bass.

Speed of the bass is normal, not too fast nor slow and shabby, It can be used for all kind of genre to be honest, including metal and EDM.

One thing about the bass though, if you're prefer more mid bass punch, this might not be the IEM for you since the bass is mostly focused on the sub bass region.

BUT, the sub-bass is deep and rumbly if you're into sub-bass.

Midrange is a bit tamed from and soundssmoother than your typical harman typed tuning.

This could be a plus or minus depending on what your preferences.
For example, if you're in search for a laid back musical tuning, the T5S could be one of the better choices out there, but on the opposite side, if you want a more aggressive and forward midrange presentation, the T5S might not be the one for you.
Its all depending on what is your subjective preferences.

Thing I could say about the midrange is that the T5S has a very good note weight, it sounds correct and does not shouty or sibilance at all, and overall presentation is very musical.

Treble is actually smooth, I'm genuinely surprised, the graph on the internet showing the T5S has a peak around 9 – 10k, but in real life, the treble is also laid back in presentation.

It does not make you tired at all by listening to it.
Extension wise it is decent, more extended than your typical single DD on this price bracket.

Technicalities
is “Good” for its asking price.

Stage is decently wide and issymmetrical in width and depth. It has good stage layering, soeverything feels like properly placed.

Imaging is OK, not the best I've heardbut its no way bad either.

Separation and Positioning is good, itis well separated while maintaining to sound cohesive at all time, positioning is also good, it is not the most razor sharp positioning I've heard but It is usable even for playing Valorant.

You won't have any problem locating object position using the T5S.
Detail Retrieval is average, it is not the most detail extracting IEM out there, but it has just enough to make it feel not dull and boring.
Though one thing I must say, even this IEM is not a detail monster, it capable to renders small nuanced decay which is very good.

Comparation

Moondrop Starfield 2
$110
The Starfield 2 has more of a bright and sterile overall tonality. It lacks bass, and the vocal is too forward in my opinion, though if u want an IEM with “clarity” you can consider the Starfield 2 as an alternative to the T5S.
Technicality wise, the T5S has a little bit better treble extension.

Letshuoer S12 Pro
$135
Single Planar, has more treble quantity and more aggressive intense sound compared to the more laidback presentation of T5S.

Technicality wise, the S12 Pro has better detail retrieval compared to the T5S, but stage wise, the T5S has more information on the layering.

Conclusion

So... did I recommend the T5S?
Honestly it depends on what you're looking for in an IEM, If you're in the market for around $100 and searching for a laid back tuning with good technicality and a very ergonomic design, YES, I can recommend the T5S.

The overall packaging, build, and accessories is also very good for its asking price.
Alright thats all from me for now, thanks for reaching this far !

Just in case you're Indonesian, or understand Bahasa Indonesia, you can watch the video here


-littlenezt

FIIO FT3 350ohm
1DD 60mm Beryllium plated
$300


First of all, let me thank FIIO for providing me with this headphone sample for this review.
Rest assured, my review is always 100% my own personal opinion.

Unboxing
Build Quality

Is very good, the FT3 is an open back design and the earcup is made from metal, while the headband is suspension type design coated with pleather.

From looks standpoint, it is somewhat giving me a “toy like” vibes? Or “Sci-Fi”? I don't know what FIIO try to aim with its beyblade looking earcup design.

Anyway, the looks is not my thing, but hey it is subjective I guess.

While the cable is made from Furukawa Monocrystaline cable, sounds fancy, the length of the cable is 3 meters, which is a bit too long to be honest.
Oh by the way the end of the connector is modular, very nice.

Comfort
Is very good, and I do use glasses for context. I can wear the FT3 for more than 3 hours before I feel like I needed to take off the headphones, the clamping force is just right, not tight, but not that loose either.

Sound

Tested using FIIO K9 AKM, FIIO KB3
Music is mostly from Apple Music (J-POP, J-Rock, EDM, RAP, Jazz, Metal)
Sound in General : Neutral – Warm

Bass is depending on what earpads you're using, with the Suede pads, bass is getting a decent amount of lift, still on the neutral side, but lifted.
With the Pleather pads, its like your reference typed bass.
Bass presentation on the suede pads is more rich, deep, and powerful.
While on the Pleather pads, it is more tight, tamed, and agile.

One thing I must said about the bass is that, it is very well extended to the sub bass region, uncommon for an open back design, especially with the Suede pads, it hits really deep and hard, I'm impressed by how deep and impactful FT3 bass is.
Though keep in mind, the quantity is not bass head levels, its more like referenced type but with very good impactful presentation.

Midrange is just like a referenced type midrange, it sounded like that with either pads, it has very good note weight, a bit on the warmer side.
Due to the bass and treble not really having that much lift, midrange is getting the main focus here.
It sounds open, a bit forward, but not shouty in my opinion.
Though for context, if you find HD600 vocal to be shouty, the FT3 vocal presentation is a bit similar to the HD600, but to my ears, both headphones are not shouty.

Treble with the pleather pads is having a bit more shine because of the reduced bass, with the suede pads overall tuning is more balanced, it just add enough sparkle on the mid treble – air region.
Overall treble presentation is just having enough bite to make everything sounds exciting and more musical than your average referenced typed headphone.

My preference in general is to use the default Suede pads, because of how the bass is lifted, it adds more body and character to the overall sound, and is very pleasing to listen.
Though if you plan to use the FT3 for audio related works, you can use the Pleather pads, I think with that it will suits your needs more.

Technicalities
is "Good" for its asking price of $300

Stage is decently wide, not the widest that I've heard, but it has very good stage layering, it feels like everything is very well placed.

Imaging is good, it sounds holographical with the right source.

Positioning and Separation is very good, probably thanks to its very good stage layering.
Object is very well positioned and is free from overlapping, even when playing a complex sound.

Detail Retrieval is average, to be honest with you, the FT3 is not a detail monster type of headphone, it has good amount of micro details but I think there is some micro details still missing from the presentation.

Comparation

Sennheiser HD600
The HD600 is more tamed and precise in sound presentation.
The sub-bass of the FT3 is much more extended compared to the HD600, but HD600 has very good overall control to all of its frequency spectrum, While on the FT3, it is more playful and musical.

Technicality wise, the stage size of FT3 is much more wide and grand compared to the HD600, and thanks to that, sound is much more well separated and positioned. Other aspects such as imaging, detail retrieval, is more or less on the same level.

Conclusion
Is the FT3 worth the asking price?

Well, from sound perspective, if you want an open back headphone with superb sub bass presentation, you should definitely check the FT3 or at least give it a try.
No joke, I'm super impressed by how deep the sub-bass can reach, the FT3 sub bass is somehow sounding more deep than my other set of closed back headphones which is crazy !
The FT3 is also very comfortable to wear for my head, and I do wear glasses for context.
And not only that, the overall build, packaging and accessories of FT3 is very well made for its asking price of only $300.

Well I guess thats all from me for now, thanks for reaching this far !

Just in case you're Indonesian or understand Bahasa Indonesia, you can watch the review video of this review below


-littlenezt.

ZiiGaat Cinno
1DD + 4BA
$99 USD

Before I even start this review, first let me thank Linsoul for providing this IEM sample for me.
Rest assured, as always my review is100% my own subjective opinion.

Unboxing
Build Quality

The IEM shell is made from double resin (?) or plastic coated with resin(?) to be honest I'm not sure.
The gap between faceplate and main body is coated with another layer of resin. I also believe the Cinno is a hollow type resin / plastic since the body is very lightweight, also the Cinno has dual vented design on its body, and is free from any driver flex.

The cable is very supple and not that easy to tangle, but sad thing, it is only has 3.5mm termination.

Comfort
Is very good, it sits nicely thanks to its slim and lightweight shell design.

Sound

Tested using : FIIO KB3, Stock Cable, Stock Eartips
Music is mostly from Apple Music(J-POP, J-Rock, EDM, RAP, Jazz, Metal)

Sound in General :
Mild V-Shape

Bass on the Cinno has decent amount of boost, not too much nor too little, its main boost is on the sub-bass region, but mid bass is also getting a slight bump to get more fuller bass sound.
Bass presentation is very good, it is deep, impactful, but speedy at the same time.

Tested on Valorant song and other EDM music, the bass is pretty deep and satisfactory, though the quantity is not on a bass head level.
While on the other hand, tested on songs such as Catasthropist – Trivium, Cinno has no problem at all on keeping up with every double pedal notes.

Midrange is a bit pushed back on the Cinno, not much, but is noticeable behind the bass and treble.
Note weight of the midrange is very good, a bit on the warmer side, both male and female vocal sounds “correct” to my ears, no complain here.

Overall midrange presentation while it is a bit pushed back from the mix, it is still sounding very clean and open, definitely free from shout and sibilance. Pretty good mild V tuning in my opinion.

As the result of the slightly pushed back midrange, instrument also obviously not taking the main stage here on the Cinno.

Treble on the Cinno is slightly emphasized around lower treble area, while the upper region is rolled off slowly like a harman target tuned treble.
This results in a slight sparkle to the sound without sounding shrill and metallic, again, very good tuning in my opinion.
Decay of the treble is normal, not too short nor "wet" / long either.

Technicality
is “Very Good” for its asking price
Stage is wide, has exact wall placement, decently layered and is symmetrical in width – depth.

Imaging is very good, I dare say it sounds almost holographic with proper source.

Detail Retrieval is very good, better than Truthear Hexa or in class with Blessing 2. It has decent amount of micro details on all its frequency and is capable to render layers of decay from the treble region.

Separation and Positioning is very good, it has well separated sound without sounding unnatural / cut out, and the positioning of sound source is very easy to pinpoint.

Comparation

Truthear Hexa
If I'm not mistaken, it is cheaper by $10.
Build quality in my opinion is better on the Cinno, while Hexa do looks more “premium”.
Hexa has that rubberized coating that I'm not sure if it will last or will be sticky overtime, while Cinno is coated with resin.
Sound wise, Cinno sounds like Hexa with pushed back midrange and slight midbass boost.
Technicality wise, the treble is more resolving on the Cinno compared to Hexa.


Conclusion

The ZiiGaat Cinno is another very good entry to the crowded $100 USD market.
It offers very good and easy to listen tuning with a very good technicality that beats the Truthear Hexa.
I can easily recommend the ZiiGaat Cinno if you're in search for a very well tuned “Mild V-Shape” sound that is easy to listen and won't break the bank.

Thank you for reaching this far !

Just in case you're Indonesian or understand Bahasa Indonesia, you can watch the video version here



-littlenezt

Kiwi Ears Cadenza
1DD Beryllium
$35USD

Before I even start this review, first let me thank Linsoul for providing this IEM sample for me.
Rest assured, as always my review is independent and 100% my own personal opinion.

Unboxing
What you get inside the box :

• IEM
• Cable
• 3 Sets of Eartips
• Warranty Printing (?)

Build Quality

The IEM shell is made from resin, though I believe it is a hollow resin because it feels really light on your ears.
The IEM is also dual vented and is free from any driver flex

While the cable is just functional, nothing special, it terminates with standard 3.5mm SE.

Comfort
Is very good, it sits nicely without any hot spots on my ears, even tested for long gaming session, I never feel any discomfort with the Cadenza.

Sound

Tested using : FIIO KA17, Stock Cable, Stock Eartips
Music is mostly from Apple Music (J-POP, J-Rock, EDM, RAP, Jazz, Metal)

Sound in General :
Harman Neutral

Bass is focused on the sub-bass region, pretty much sounding like a harman target bass.
The bass control is very good, it is deep and tight, the speed is also speedy enough to use for double pedal and metal songs.

Midrange is very well tuned, no sibilance, not shouty, and has very good note weight, both male and female vocal sounds “correct” to my ears.
As for instruments, it sounds OK, not too forward and has correct placement.
Though one thing I must mention is that if you're individual that want intense midrange sounds, this IEM might be unsatisfactory for you because the mids is not forward and renders in a bit more laidback presentation.

Treble is smooth without any peaks, not the most extended treble either.
It has a very safe tuning for long listening session.
Though if you're treble heads it might be a little bit too safe for you.

Technicality
is Above Average / Good for its asking price.

Stage is not the widest but not intimate either, it has exact wall placement and is symmetrical in shape.

Imaging is a bit depending on the source that you use, lets say if I use FIIO KA17, the sound is no joke almost or even I'd dare say holographical, but with inferior source, it sounds what I like to call as a 2.5D sounding, not exactly 2D but not holographic either.

Detail Retrieval is average, it has decent amount of details but not much micro detail, expected for the price.

Separation and Positioning is good, it has decent separation and good positioning, tested on competitive game such as Valorant, I can easily pinpoint which sound is coming from.
For music tested on lots of nZk songs, the sound is decently separated.

As for comparation, just ask in the comment section, If i have tested the IEM, and I got the notification, I will reply ASAP.

Conclusion
The Kiwi Ears Cadenza is a very well tuned IEM for around $35USD, If you're in search for a daily beater or EDC item, OR if you never tried a Harman Neutral tuned IEM, I can easily recommend this IEM for its asking price.
The Cadenza is enjoyable to listen for long listening session, it offers fatigue free sound and is very comfortable to wear thanks to its lightweight and somewhat ergonomic shell.

Thanks for reaching this far !


-littlenezt.

FIIO KA17
Dual ES9069Q + THX AAA 78+
$150 USD

First, let me thank FIIO for sending me this DAC in for review, rest assured my review is 100% my own personal opinion.
If you're interested on the KA17, you can check the official FIIO page below
https://www.fiio.com/KA17

Unboxing
Inside the box, you get :

• KA17
• C to C cable
• C to A Adapter
• Leather Case
• Quick Start Guide
• Warranty Card
• Type C Rubber Plug

Build Quality

Is good, KA17 build is mixed from aluminum(?) and glass, though I do notice some residue / dust around the front glass part of the KA17, it might be just my unit but hey its there.
The KA17 has a monochrome OLED screen which display some information like sample rate, gain, desktop mode, volume and UAC mode

Right side of the device, it has multi function button, volume button and “Desktop Mode” switch.

The KA17 Desktop Mode requires you to plug additional type C cable on the left side of the device provide power to the dongle.

To be honest the positioning of the port is a bit awkward in my personal setup and testing.

On the back side there is some FIIO branding and information like Hi Res Audio logo.

On the bottom there are 4.4mm and 3.5mm ports

When you connect the KA17 to your smartphone you can set EQ and look at the guide of the device via FIIO Control APP.

On the KA17 itself, you can set settings such as :

• Gain
• Filter
• Vol Step
• S/PDIF ON / OFF
• Channel Balance
• Brightness
• MQA ON / OFF
• EQ ON / OFF
• Max Vol
• Rotate Display
• Display Timeout
• USB Audio
• Language
• Check the Firmware Version
• Factory Reset Device

Battery Consumption
Plugged in to my Infinix Zero 30 5G device, it drains 1% of battery for around 7minutes of playback time, so the KA17 is not really power hungry for use as a portable device.

Sound

The KA17 has 8 Filters to choose, but I found the stock FAST filter to be my favorite, so I will describe the sound with the FAST filter.
I would like to describe the KA17 as a slightly warm sounding device

Bass on the KA17 is on the warmer side of the spectrum, I can easily notice that the KA17 has some kind of bass highlight / emphasize on the lower region. The bass sound “dense” to me for the lack of better words.

The bass presentation is on the slower / wet / more emotional than your typical ESS Sabre analytical sound.
Tested using FT3 350ohm with desktop mode, the KA17 has no problem giving superb control and dynamics, KA17 bass is pretty satisfactory in my opinion.

Midrange on the KA17 is also warm and weighty, especially on the lower midrange area.
It also sounds “dense” to my ears, definitely not muddy but it has additional weight to display more emotion and dynamic.

Upper midrange sound a bit more laid back and rounded than normal, it is very safe sounding for bad recordings / low quality files. Even your low quality music will not sound like a mess on the KA17, it is good in my opinion so user can just enjoy their music rather than analyzing flaws on the recording / file quality.

Treble here is smooth but extended at the same time, the KA17 is a very safe sounding device, it shows music as a whole music or cohesive rather than analytical separated music.
Don't get this wrong, the KA17 has superb detail for its price but the presentation here is just not very analytical. I dare say it is almost as good as the Cayin RU7 which cost 2times more than the KA17.

Technicalities
Is spectacular for its asking price of only $150

Stage is grand and full of layered presentation which is again, mind blowing for its price.
At first listening I thought the KA17 would be priced around $250 - $300 because of how good the stage layering is. (yes I received the KA17 before launch and without knowing the specs / price at all)

Detail Retrieval is very good for its price, it has a lot of micro details, the KA17 also capable to render layers of decay sound. While it is not the best I've heard (well because it is only $150) but the point here is for only $150USD the KA17 capable to render micro layer sounds.

Imaging is very good, it makes my Moondrop CHU 2 sounds holographic which is crazy, this is also the one that makes me think at first if the KA17 is priced at $250 or above, mind blowing for only $150

Separation & Positioning is very good, while the presentation of the KA17 is “whole”, cohesive, and musical, you can still easily separate and pinpoint which sound is coming from.

Output Power is rated at 650mw @ 32ohm balanced and 270mw @32ohm SE both with Desktop Mode enabled.
Tested with FT3 350ohm, KA17 did not have any problem driving the FT3 to its full potential.

SE vs Balanced
Obviously with balanced you get more power, tonality wise it sounds similar but with balanced I do noticed more superior stage size and separation and dynamics.

Comparation

Moondrop Moonriver 2 Ti $190 USD
The KA17 easily beats the Moonriver 2 Ti in terms of technicalities, which is why I also thought the KA17 would be priced around $250+
The Moonriver 2 Ti has different tonality, the Moonriver 2 Ti is more neutral and clear sounding of the two, while KA17 has more emotion and dynamics.

Cayin RU7 $300 USD
The RU7 has more superior technicalities compared to the KA17, but its not by much.
The RU7 has more details and superior micro layering especially on the decay of the sound, it sounds much more “wet” compared to the KA17.
Tonality wise, the RU7 has more organic timbre but more or less same tonality in general, probably thanks to its 1bit resistor configuration compared to the DS DAC that KA17 use.

Conclusion

All of the new FIIO releases is blowing my mind for real, it offers very good value for its price, it just like I'm always repeating myself at this point on my conclusion.
Every single one of new FIIO releases, I got shocked and always made me rethink the price to performance value of a device.
In other words, FIIO pretty much always set a new bar and a new standard for its price bracket on all of its newest releases.

Yes while on my particular unit the build is not perfect (the residue / dust under the glass part), the sound quality is really, really good.
If you're in the market for a versatile dongle that you can also use as your desktop DAC-AMP, I can whole heartedly recommend the KA17 for its asking price of only $150USD

Thanks for reaching this far !

Just in case you're Indonesian or understand Bahasa Indonesia, you can watch the review below


-littlenezt.

FIIO BTR15
ES9219MQ * 2
$109

First, let me thank FIIO for sending me this bluetooth receiver / DAC - AMP in for review, rest assured my review is 100% my own personal opinion.
If you're interested on the BTR15, you can check the official FIIO page below
https://www.fiio.com/BTR15

Unboxing
Inside the box, you get :

• BTR15
• C to C cable
• C to A Adapter
• Clip Case
• Quick Start Guide
• Warranty Card

Build Quality
Is good, the BTR15 its front and back is made from glass while the frame use metal that I believe to be aluminum.

I do notice some glue residue around the front glass part of the BTR15, it might be just my unit but hey its there.
The BTR15 has a monochrome OLED screen just like the BTR5 2021, but it is larger so it can displays more information and not too cumbersome to use (while operating the menu).

Right side of the device, it has power / menu button, play - pause / select menu button, volume button / up down menu button and a mode switch (PC - BT - Phone)

With PC Mode, the BTR15 when plugged to PC, it will draw power from USB port, and not charge the device.
With BT mode, well just like the mode said, it uses battery and you can use bluetooth connection.
With Phone Mode, you can connect the BTR15 as a dongle without draining your phone battery.

There is nothing on the left side

On the back side there is glass with FIIO and other branding such as the Hi-Res Audio logo


On the upper side of the device, there is a 4.4mm and 3.5mm port

On the bottom part of the device there is a type C port


When you connect the BTR15 to bluetooth, you can set :

• Idle Power Off
• Select Bluetooth Codec
• Select Operation Mode
• Menu Operation
• Wake Screen
• EQ
• Volume Limiting
• Bluetooth Vol
• Call Volume
• Channel Balance
• Dual DAC Mode
• Distortion Compensation
• and Look at the Guide

via FIIO Control APP

On the BTR15 itself, you can set settings such as

• Charging Protection
• Gain
• Filter
• EQ
• Car Mode
• UAC Audio
• Dimmer / Brightness
• OFF Display / Display Time Out
• Language
• Reset
• Look at the Firmware Version
• and Techcon(?)

Battery Life & Charging
I get around 6 hours+ of battery life using LDAC connection and charging time take about 1.5 - 2hours.

Sound + Comparation
I would like to describe the BTR15 as a generally neutral sounding device.
The BTR15 has 2 filters that you can choose, but i found the “Hybrid” filter to be my favorite.
So for the sound part I will describe it with the Hybrid filter.

Bass on the BTR15 is slightly warm than neutral, not much, just like really small amount hint of warmth there to add more emotion to the music, just like the BTR5 2021.
Compared to the BTR7, the BTR7 has more rounded and more emphasize on the bass region, not only that, the BTR7 also has more dynamic and authoritative feeling on the bass presentation.

Midrange on the BTR15 is neutral, just like the BTR5 2021, but I found the BTR15 to be somewhat more open sounding compared to the BTR5 2021, though it is still on the neutral realm. You can pretty much use the BTR15 with all kinds of different IEM and Headphones that you choose, the BTR15 won't add much color to your sound, which can be good or bad things depending on what you need.

If compared to the BTR7, the BTR7 has more warmth on the lower midrange and overall midrange of the BTR7 is more laid back and relaxed.

Treble here is fairly neutral, but in comparison to the BTR5 2021 and BTR7, I found the BTR15 having more sparkle and more open sounding than the BTR5 2021 and BTR7, which again could be a good or bad depending on what you're searching for on a device.

Treble here is surprisingly good and full of details for its price category, much more resolving than the older BTR5 2021, and almost as good as the BTR7.
Though the BTR7 has more relaxed treble but in the same time more resolving capabilities compared to the BTR15, which is expected due to different price bracket.

Technicalities
Is very good for its asking price of just $109 USD.

Stage is very large and have somewhat layered presentation which is mind blowing for its price.

Detail Retrieval is very good for its price, its almost has the same amount of detail of the BTR7, though if I had to say, it's missing some layers that BTR7 offers (expected because of price difference).

Imaging is above average or good, It has no problem to display holographical information if your IEM / Headphones has that holographical capabilities.

Separation & Positioning is very good, now you can separate and search where sound is coming from more easily thanks to the more open sounding midrange and treble compared to the older BTR5 2021.

Output Power is rated at 340mw @ 32ohm balanced and 125mw @32ohm SE.
Yes the BTR15 has improved output power matching the BTR7.

Bluetooth vs USB
I do notice a bit more improved dynamics with USB / wired connectivity, but I'm willing to sacrifice that improved dynamics for ease of use via bluetooth.

SE vs Balanced
Obviously with balanced you get more power, tonality wise it sounds similar and the technicalities is almost identical with Dual DAC mode ON.

Conclusion

The BTR15 is probably the most budget friendly, versatile little device that you can get right now to improve your audio listening experience.
It cost only $109USD and offers almost as good technicality as the BTR7, though the BTR7 still have its own pros such as more dynamic sounding while sounding relaxed but resolving overall sound presentation.

But for the price of only $109, I can easily recommend the BTR15 if you want to invest in a cost effective but very versatile little device that you can carry everywhere.

Just in case you're Indonesian or understand Bahasa Indonesia, you can watch the review of BTR15 here


-littlenezt.