Reviews by lllandline

lllandline

New Head-Fier
Soft. Warm. Weak.
Pros: 1) Wide soundstage.
How wide? Well, it's just not cramped, DACs have no ability to actually widen anything that goes through them.
2) Treble is absolutely non-agressive, just zero bite, while not having any deficiency in extension.
Harsh IEMs can benefit from it.
3) Low noise, it's still there with sensitive IEMs, but like 2 times lower than with, for example, E1DA 9038D.
Cons: 1) Bass is really warm with weak texture.
The only IEM that actually benefited from it was an Ali copy of Etymotic ER4S.
Which has no elevated bass whatsoever and just sounds as dry as something you leave in the sun for a week.
2) Zero bite in treble means zero treble excitement.
And I am very sensitive to treble.
Zero treble excitement means that you listen to a song, you hear treble, you dismiss it as noise/something that just happens.
It doesn't sound natural or realistic, it sounds both digital and weak.
3) Heavy for portable use, USB C port won't be happy.
Also default cable sucks, really thin.
Definitely not a universal device.
Pair it only with the harshest, most bass-deficient IEMs.

Design is good, low noise is good, physical gain switch is good.

But I still can't listen to it for more than 15 minutes.
It's just the awful pillowy bass texture and treble that sounds like nothing.

I see that people really love this dongle, I understand why, I've never heard a DAC that smoothes out the sound so much without losing treble extension or doing something weird.
But it's just not music anymore, it's just sounds.

IEMs used:
Sony XBA 300;
Sony XBA Z5 modded;
Etymotic ER4S copy (same driver with 100ohm resistor in different resin housing);
Simgot EA500;
Tanchjim OLA Bass;
7Hz Timeless.
Last edited:
laleeee
laleeee
Heavy for portable use ?

lllandline

New Head-Fier
Splashy.
Pros: They do almost nothing wrong, from bass to treble, but
Cons: they are kinda shouty and splashy, you can hear the excess of energy where upper mids connect to lower treble.
This means that listening to them at a higher volume level is really uncomfortable.
And at lower volume levels they are a little annoying, as the snare hits and parts of upper treble obviously (for me) have too much energy.
I've seen people talking about them having insufficient treble, but I can't confirm that, treble rolls off only after 15kHz, which is a nice result.
$30 is an adequate price for Cadenza, nothing groundbreaking.
If you've heard one decent $30 set, you've heard them all, I guess.
  • Like
Reactions: o0genesis0o

lllandline

New Head-Fier
Mediocre $20 set.
Pros: 1) Good amount of bass, not bad quality.
2) Mids are neutral, not recessed.
3) Nice minimalistic cable. Nice tips made out of thick, soft silicone. Also 5 sizes of them, including medium-small and medium-big.
4) Shells look nice.
Cons: 1) Sibilance.
Small (on the FR graph) 8kHz peak is hyperemphasized by a steep roll off afterwards.
They sound both sharp/sibilant and dull.
Definitely not a relaxing set.
Drums sound painful at medium and higher volumes, or just abrasive at lower volumes.
2) No upper treble, bad technicalities.
3) CCA CRA exists.
More relaxing listen without sibilance, with alive treble.
Recessed mids. Not a big issue, but they're not the best on this set also.
Burn in, tip rolling, source rolling (iBasso DC03 Pro, e1da 9038d, xDuoo Link2 BAL) didn't help with eliminating sibilance.

Two cotton heads from cotton swabs, each cut in two, with thicker part being placed inside the nozzle worked.
That trick always works with peaks and overall bad treble.
Frequency response smoothes out, bringing recessed parts up and all the peaky parts down.
Which means less lower treble and more upper treble.
Also tilts the sound towards bass. Requires much more power afterwards, because we've pretty much dampened half of the FR.

I think that CCA CRA is a much better choice in all aspects.
If you like mids, Hola is not that great with them, to be honest, keep searching.

Can't say I feel like I've wasted my money.
Cotton trick worked perfectly, they go from 5/10 to 7.5-8/10 afterwards.
I've seen a lot worse cables alone costing up to $15.
But you'll need to open them up, tear out the filter, cut the cotton correctly and adjust it several times (or dozens, if you're not experienced), while trying to remove channel imbalance that comes from density and volume differences of the cottons inside the nozzles.
Last edited:
GoneToPlaid
GoneToPlaid
I don't understand how you found the Hola to be sibilant. Personally, I find that the Hola has the most relaxing sound signature of all of the fairly recent budget IEMs which I have tried. The Hola had replaced my Tripowin x HBB Mele IEMs as my favorite "chill pill" IEMs which I listen to when I am tired.

lllandline

New Head-Fier
Can be fixed with modding.
Pros: 1) Great treble extension, upper treble sounds awesome, super-tweeter actually works.
2) No sibilance.
3) Overall coherency, Sony house sound.
Cons: 1) Boomy, low-quality bass that bleeds. Not great! Even the leanest of sources fail to fix this.
Balanced outputs/cables also don't do anything.
2) Dynamic driver was tuned wrong, it just overpowers the BA tech.
They had to justify the XBA in the name, it seems, so they let the driver loose.
Bad decision.
3) Because the dynamic driver is overpowering everything, everything in the middle is smoothed over and sounds a bit like a mess.
4) Fit is atrocious, they are BIG, default cable is awful, make sure you have really big ears, otherwise they'll be sticking out too much.
I am strongly advising against buying them if you do not intend to mod them.
They do not sound that great and there are lots of $20-$50 IEMs that sound much better.
If you want unique Sony sound, buy EX1000 or EX800ST.

I have fixed them by opening them up and covering the dynamic driver's port with tape and stuffing both nozzles with 2 high-density tuning foams 4x4mm each, you can make you own, or just buy them on some Chinese marketplace.
You need to heat them up before doing that, there's glue holding them together, start with the notch near the MMCX port, press really hard at 45 degree angle and pry the cover out.
1677675189161.png

Yes, you will scratch them while doing that.
You can see tuning foam used for covering the port of the DD, there isn't nearly enough.
If you want the bass to still be dominant, use a bigger piece of foam instead of taping them up completely.
Afterwards they have 9/10 treble extension/quality/realism, literally the best out of my whole collection (including 7HZ Timeless and HZ Heart Mirror).
I can imagine something that sounds better, but I've never heard it.
Bass sounds good, with good balance and nice sub-bass kick.
Mids are cleared up.
There is some sibilance in the treble, somewhere around 9kHz.
However, I am really treble sensitive and can tolerate it without a problem, it doesn't ruin the sound, you can add more foam into the nozzles and the sibilance will be gone, but you will lose some treble extension/realism, just use warm sources.
The mod is easily reversible, just don't lose these small foams that are already inside.
My score after the mod is 4.5 out of 5.
Sources used: E1DA 9038D with 75ohm adapter, xDuoo Link2 BAL, iBasso DC03 Pro.
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: monmon2
L
lllandline
Review was rewritten

lllandline

New Head-Fier
Pros: 1) Power.
2) Weight.
3) Tight bass, upper treble sounds great.
4) Ability to tweak it with an andoid app or firmware.
Cons: 1) Some treble sibilance, doesn't go well with already sibilant in the 7kHz-9kHz range IEMs.
2) Picks up 4G, it really is a problem if you're commuting.
3) Lean, cold, analytical, all of that.
4) I couldn't hear any difference in sound while tweaking this DAC.
Zero audible difference in sound between filters.
No interesting filters like NOS simulation that alter the sound audibly.
For $100 you can buy much more universal iBasso DC03 Pro and a good $20-$30 IEM.
Though I have to say, 9038D has the best upper treble.
Last edited:

lllandline

New Head-Fier
Boring, comes with really bad imaging.
Pros: They are really neutral.
Good build quality.
Good detalization.
Cons: They are too neutral, not exciting in any way.
There is a slight peak somewhere in the lower treble.
Bad sound placement.
It's just left-right, I don't know what they've done, but it's just absolutely the worst I've heard.
I can tell that something is somewhere left, right, or center, but I can't tell where exactly.
As if something's happening with the phase, but phase tests don't show anything, so it's not a faulty unit that was wired incorrectly.
Would've been 4.0/5.0 if they didn't fail with imaging that bad.
Last edited:

lllandline

New Head-Fier
Pros: Wide and kinda spacious soundstage.
Cons: KZ house sound.
Which means mid and treble peaks, bloated bass and strange instrument positioning.
Price in current day market.
Sometimes I try to listen to them again.
I get severely disappointed in several seconds and put them far away until the next time.
Last edited:

lllandline

New Head-Fier
Pros: Soundstage, good build, mids, sound feels... big?
Cons: Noise floor, sound itself is just unpleasurable.
Treble is mediocre, bass is awful (boomy and textureless).
Mids are good.
You can overcharge it and kill the battery, I mean, how could they actually NOT put a charging controller in there, it's not a 10$ product.
Packaging is kinda good, though no OTA cable, which is a bit hilarious.
In comparison, Cayin N3 obliterates this item in DAC mode.

lllandline

New Head-Fier
Pros: They are unique.
1) Neutral sound. Great for mixing. Consider this fact while reading other pros.
2) Bass is powerful and has no limits.
3) Realistic mids.
4) Overall sound is bold and powerful.
5) Stock sound is very open and light; however, soundstage is maybe a half a meter in diameter. Bigger than in any of my IEMs (excluding DM6's, these are just as big), but still not as big as you might've thought after reading some reviews.
6) Separation is top-notch.
Cons: 1) Treble roll-off kills realism in sound. It is not THAT severe, but will lose to armatures like ZS6.
2) Bass isn't that great in terms of it's quality, it's just the amount of it. Sub-bass is crippled by big vents, closing them causes bass to become boomy trash, I'm not that kind of basshead. Can actually be fixed with EQ.
3) 5.5kHz-6kKz peak that kills the pleasure of listening to these earphones. Can be fixed through equalizing. Treble can be fixed, but to some degree. They are just physically unable to provide great treble, unfortunately. Otherwise I would've ended up my audiophile journey right now.
4) Somewhat low-res feeling, I guess that's what people call grainy treble, kills realism even more.
5) Sound leaks a lot, no isolation, awkward fit with stock cable and long tips. I don't really care about such things, though.
Stock cable is really, really bad, I thought that cable-believers are silly people before I've purchased MMCX adapters and good copper cable for these earphones.
Considered selling them as many times as realizing that I've nearly made a big mistake.
Bought them for 200$ with shipping.
Was definitely disappointed after first listen. Well, they are seriously source-dependent.
  • Like
Reactions: SIRKRA and Sp12er3
FastAndClean
FastAndClean
before years i heard the EX1000 considered by many to be the king of dynamic drivers, it was grainy and aggressive in the upper mids with no treble extension, kind of uneven sounding, have no idea why so many people love them so much
Sp12er3
Sp12er3
I agree with all of the point here, it's pretty strange IEM.
Must add that I think what people pointing about soundstage is mistaking them for openness, this is very, quite open.
For people used to BAvs treble and detail, the grain masking things would make them sound pretty low fi, but when you start listening between the line it is still very textured and full, something I haven't found on any DD IEM I've tried.

lllandline

New Head-Fier
They sound off.
Pros: 1) They look good.
2) Soundstage is kinda interesting.
Cons: 1) Big spike at 9kHz.
2) Pillowy sound, bass is smoothed over, mids are smoothed over, treble is smoothed over.
3) Price.
I did like them in 2019.
Today it's just D-tier.
Last edited:

lllandline

New Head-Fier
Pros: 1) Detail amount: just like it's supposd to be - it's just a headphones that work as they have to work: they don't lose details. That's it, there are no details to reveal, headphones can only fail to do what they have to do.
2) Very comfortable. Small, beautiful (well, I just really like Sony design in everything), they disappear in you ears if you'll pick big enough tips.
3) I don't care about the price, but srsly: I've bought two genuine pairs on ebay (don't try amazon, read reviews, you'll find that seller on eBay with no problems) for, like, 24$, including shipping to Russia.
4) Overall tonal balance: first headphones that don't need an EQ.
5) Bass isn't as deep or rumbly, but it's there, it's powerful, it doesn't bleed, sub-bass is deep and can create that basshead-ecstasy feeling.
Cons: 1) VERY short cable.
2) Overall sound is a bit simple, soundstage isn't that wide, layering isn't all that strong. Which is great if you want non-analytical, but music-listening experience, not to listen to disconnected parts of a track. Which is, of course, sometimes awesome, but it gets really old after several months.
Tested them on Massive Attack tracks (why? because they have insane mixing quality with a lot of kinda quiet, background samples), on some black metal, on noise and power electronics albums - they don't fail in any of this genres.
If you want to get really cinematic experience - tame the highs and lows thorugh an EQ, lift mids a bit. Wait for your brains to adapt.
  • Like
Reactions: captione
captione
captione
Noise music? Nice
Tried my pair on The Gerogerigegege, p insane how they sounded sterile compared to my other iems.

lllandline

New Head-Fier
Pros: 1) Great soundstage.
2) Mids are great.
3) The most beautiful shells to this day.
Each color.
Cons: 1) Giant, explosive treble peak at 6kHz-8kHz, with no treble extension afterwards.
They sound dull and really painful at the same time.
Blunt force trauma in an IEM form.
2) Price.
I remember stopping believing reviewers after getting them.
Multiple graphs show that my unit wasn't faulty.
Complete tuning failure.
Last edited:
Janjohnnn
L1nuss
L1nuss
My experience with these in ear is positive ... At the beginning I had the same problems you found. After a bit of a break-in, things have improved slightly, but not satisfactorily. My X5III did not match at all with these DM6, I tried to set the Gain on H, Headphones have become more stable, fuller and more solid: I have no more sibilances and the bass is good. The voice is central and good positioned. So, as far as I'm concerned, it sounds good now.
Redcarmoose
Redcarmoose
So sorry they didn’t work out for you. I personally find them to be one of my favorite IEMs ever at any price. Nice fit, wonderful sounding and a great build. Experimenting with tips, DAPs and cables is one way to avoid the detrimental qualities you describe in your review. Though this hobby is very subjective and even maybe with effort to match tips and cables you may not have found a sound you like.

lllandline

New Head-Fier
Pros: Great sub bass.
Cons: Awful treble spike.
It's early KZ, not really good in any way.
Sibilant as hell.
Sounds off.
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Rocktim

lllandline

New Head-Fier
There's a new batch of ZS6's.
Pros: 1) Less treble than original ZS6.
2) Paint is actually good this time. Definitely better than what they've used several years ago.
3) Still good soundstage/separation.
They sound... big?
Cons: Mids, bass and everything else is as subpar as it was before.
Fatiguing sound. It's not only about the treble, mids are fatiguing too.
Not bad, but not good also.
It's like a perfect example of an old school Chi-Fi sound.
Lots of drivers with strange/mediocre result.
New version is basically an upgraded version of the old ZS6s.
Less treble fatigue, better balance overall.
Not worth $50 in today's market.
Last edited:
DocHoliday
DocHoliday
If the bass is muddy and the vocals are distant you may have a defective pair (they are out of phase). Try reversing one of the cable connections and see if clarity and presence improves. If it does then your ZS6 is wired out of phase. The stock cable is awful and it should be replaced anyway so I would pick a good "KINBOOFI 2-Pin cable" up off of AliExpress for $20. Problem solved.....or exchange them for a properly wired set, but you'll still need to replace the cable. Hope this was helpful .
TLDRonin
TLDRonin
I just got a pair today and feel like we have two different IEMs. It sounds like yours is a dud. QC isn't a strongpoint of chi-fi
L
lllandline
DocHoliday is right, it worked, can't believe it
Changing rating

lllandline

New Head-Fier
Boomy.
Pros: 1) They are sturdy.
2) Unique sound.
Cons: 1) Very hot treble.
2) Very boomy bass.
3) They sound off.
It's kinda interesting that they came with earbud foams included.
They definitely sound better with those on.
But why were they made into an IEM?
Last edited:
Back
Top