Reviews by n0varay

n0varay

New Head-Fier
Pros: -
> Decently accessorized
> Gorgeous aesthetics with premium resin shells
> Price to performance ratio
> Warm tonality with excellent presence and clarity in the midrange
> +13dB sub-bass elevation for bass aficionados
> Thick, airy bass with excellent depth
> Above average detail retrieval
Cons: -
< Average soundstage
< Average resolution
< Lacking treble extension
< Large shell may not fit those with smaller ears
< Requires substantial amplification for optimal performance

Alpha Omega Ra – Ra-markably Exhilarating​

1000077916.jpg

Disclaimers​

  • The reviewed IEM is a borrowed personal unit. Regardless, all the opinions are original ideas, there is zero influence from any 3rd party or external opinions.
  • No EQ or filter presets were used during the entire review period.
  • Sound evaluation are kept neutral and does not include 3rd party accessories (ie; eartips, cable, reversible mods)



Introduction​

Alpha Omega Custom In-Ear or better known as AO for short has enjoyed excellent spell during recent times, seeing brand new handcrafted models of custom in-ears rolling out of their production line. Entering midway during 2023 last year, AO has released four new models such as the Voyager, a collaboration project with Hillaudio Malaysia which I have covered last time. Next, was the Indomitus, followed by the continuation of their flagship sequel, Omegon MKII and lastly the latest one which I will be reviewing this time, is the Alpha Omega Ra. Every time AO released a brand new model, I cannot help myself being excited and eagerly anticipated to try out the models for myself.

Luckily, with the help of my audio buddies that I have met online, I was kindly offered to test and review the Alpha Omega Ra at my own comfort. Huge shout-out and appreciation for the kind offer. At the heart of this earpiece, AO has presented to us 7-drivers total of tribrid design for the Ra. Combining one beryllium plated dynamic-driver, 4 Sonion balanced armatures for its low-mid and midrange frequencies and lastly 2 Sonion electrostatic drivers for the treble feeded through an in-house developed 4-way passive crossover. While that may seem mouthful enough to say, this whole package comes with a price tag of only RM2668 or equivalent to US$563 (rounded-off). Hence, with that let’s get on with the review.



Unboxing Experience​

1000077790.jpg


Packaging of the Ra was minimal and straightforward, similar to most of AO offering in their catalog albeit midrange or flagship models. Presentation was overall basic whereby there is no such premium feature when compared to other brands. Nonetheless, what is more important is certainly what’s inside the package and the monitors itself. On the sleeve cover there is a branding logo on the front, a specification list and a diagram of the frequency response at the back. By sliding the sleeve either top or bottom unveils the main box.

1000077723.jpg


Flipping the main box cover, unveils the monitor itself placed snug inside a thick foam cut out. As we explore further AO have included in the package, one custom made premium casing made from faux leather complemented with a well-padded velvet upholstery in the inside to store your monitors. Stored in the casing as well is the stock cable and 3 pairs of silicone eartips that what seems to be similar of AT07 eartips which comes in various sizes (S,M,L).



Cable​

1000077597.jpg

AO has certainly hit the nail on the head with the cable aesthetics, which further compliments the overall aesthetics of the Ra. In terms of the build and material, AO went to choose a 4 core, gold plated silver cable which, I reckon are SPC cables. Hands on experience using the cable was overall great, similarly to other AO monitors which I have tried in the past, such as the Lambda, Iota and Omegon MKI. The cable is insulated with a soft pliable yellowish PVC material which further radiates its golden charm. Braiding quality on this are neat and fairly secure, the connectors are made out of lightweight stainless steel. At the end of each 2-pin connectors, there are no such indication of “L” or “R” other than the plastic bit which holds the two tiny pins in red and clear.



Specifications​

  • Driver(s): 1 Beryllium Plated Dynamic-driver, 2 Sonion Low-mid BA, 2 Sonion Mid BA, 2 Sonion EST Drivers with 4-way Passive Crossover
  • Impedance: 28 Ohms
  • Sensitivity: 105dB/SPL
  • Frequency Response: 10Hz-40kHz
  • Cable: 4 core, gold plated silver cable, 2-pin (0.78mm) to 3.5mm connectors



Build and Comfort​

With there are being so much drivers cramped inside the Ra, it is no surprise to see this monitor to have such large shell which are made with premium resin using a custom made universal mold. The motive chosen by AO to decorate this earpiece is inspired by galaxies or milky way given that the overall colour language were predominantly white with a touch of pinkish hue and golden glitters. Of course, customers can opt to add their own touch of creativity to design their own customized earpiece via personal consultation. But even for the universal variant, the artwork quality for Ra looks absolutely stunning and gorgeous.

1000077817.jpg


One notable feature aspect that strikes me the most when inspecting the design for the Ra was the existence of large vent port on each side of the monitor, positioned next to the 2-pin connectors. Curious with my finding, I brought the matter into a discussion among audiophile buddies including Clement, the man behind Alpha Omega inside a small WhatsApp group chat. Little did I knew, my wild guess of the “secret sauce” was true, a similar feature of FIR Audio’s ATOM Venting technology. Which AO call it as Alpha Omega Proprietary Venting System that reduces pressure build up in a sealed ear canal, hence provides greater comfort, less ear fatigue and indirectly affects the overall bass delivery which I will further explain in sound evaluation.

The overall texture of the shell is smooth to the hand and polished. At the nozzle end however it was not quite refined as there are some unevenness when compared to other IEMs I tried recent times that shares similar build material. Even though comfort varies across users, I personally consider the design was very comfortable and ergonomic with an out sticking design on that acts like a supporting feature that naturally slides into my concha ensuring a snug and secure seal when using the IEM. The feather light build allows me to use the Ra comfortably, even for long hours. Analyzing inside of the earpieces, seeing all of the wiring are neat and professionally made albeit the inside cavity is apparently empty. Hence, it is best to not drop these gorgeous earpieces from tall height or onto hard surface since to avoid serious damage to the internal components.



Test Equipment​

  • Local Hi-Res files > Astell&Kern SE100 M.Chat (Linear Phase Fast Roll-off Filter)
  • Tidal (Master) + Local Hi-Res files via Sony Music Centre > Sony Xperia 1 V (DSEE Ultimate + Dolby Atmos - OFF)
Readers may be advised that other than preference and hearing capabilities, equipment variations could also result to different opinions. Thus, those with premium and much refined equipment may yield greater results.



Power Requirements​

When looking through the specification numbers, the Ra seems to be a friendly monitor to be driven directly through a smartphone. Although the case is true, this IEM does benefit from higher output number as greater dynamics can be achieved when properly amped.

Driving it straight from my Sony Xperia 1 V, I had to turn up the volume between 10-13/30 to achieve a comfortable listening experience. Plugging the Ra into my Astell&Kern SE100 on both balanced and unbalanced output requires me to turn the volume wheel up to 60-70/150 on unbalanced, meanwhile on balanced requires me to dial downwards to 50/150 at most.



Initial Impression​

Since this IEM is a borrowed personal unit, I need not worry regarding burn-in phase for the IEM itself prior to sound evaluation. Throughout the analysis, I paired up the Ra with a neutral A&K SE100 source with Linear Phase Fast Roll-off Filter chosen given that it’s the most natural sounding filter compared to default. Test tracks used can be found down below.

1000080006.jpg

Frequency response for Ra, taken from Alpha Omega Official Instagram page.
Alpha Omega Ra is a mildly V-shaped pair of monitors that exudes warm, musical sound signature with prominent emphasis mainly in the sub-bass region. Approximately, the graph starts at least from +13dB in the 20Hz frequency which then gradually drops before 500Hz frequency. This results to a warm tonal balance, rich and coloured sound, however Ra does not sound weak at all in the higher frequencies. Upper-mids and top end of the frequencies are elevated a couple decibels shy below the bass shelf.

Moreover, pinna region on Ra is scooped out by a few decibels to keep preserve vocal naturalness which I appreciate the most. Past the 10kHz frequencies however, I could notice Ra fell short to present better than average treble extension even when compared to my dual-BA reference Audio Technica ATH-IM02. Regardless, the usage of EST in this earpiece, added with the vent ports fortunately, kept the Ra in the game because this IEM has tons of detail retrieval, good resolving treble and excellent airiness.

Low Frequency (Bass)
Being its most valuable asset and strongest attribute, Ra has an absurdly deep low rumbling bass and wide extension in the upper-bass to lower-mids. The elevated sub-bass produced by the single beryllium plated DD gives the Ra a powerful subwoofer effect, capable of rendering detailed textured low-bass without any sort of muddiness. While mid-bass and upper-bass delivery has moderate speed, bass slam resembles a thick yet airy “thud” sound rather than boomy, which was a false assessment. Each bass slam has an emphasized note weight and impact due to the boosted sub-bass, additionally bass decay and transients are slow and extended providing slightly above average depth reach from the loudest to the quietest of bass

Coming back to my earlier comment regarding the functionality of the large vent port on Ra, this similar feature to FIR Audio’s ATOM Venting system allows the Ra to produce not only the deep rumble sub-bass and keeping internal air pressure at bay, but it is also responsible for the natural dispersion for each bass slam. It can be quite difficult to explain it in words but a simple test you can do is by covering the vent ports with blu tacks or tape. From my own analysis, I could hear there was a noticeable amount of resonance within the chamber with the mid-bass hits with a slight more aggressive.

Middle Frequency (Mid)
Despite the Ra could be considered as a bass heavy and many might associate it to an overly warm, dark sound. It was not entirely the case with Ra, the lower-mids blends superbly with the excess upper-bass. That being said, the midrange handled by four Sonion balanced armature units are tuned slightly north to neutral in terms of tonal balance.

Moving into the 1kHz frequency and above, AO did a fairly stunning job to keep the midrange fairly forward, natural with excellent presence for such tuning without being overwhelmed by the heavy bass. In the upper-mids, Ra in my opinion has a proper pinna gain, which I reckon AO did manage to scoop a couple decibels from frequencies around 2k-3.5kHz without sacrificing detail within the midrange considering this is a smoother tuned monitor.

High Frequency (Treble)
Treble tuning of Ra has a decent amount of sparkle and energy which honestly I was expecting a bit more considering AO has opt for dual Sonion EST drivers. But either way, the treble was still crisp, very capable gushing out low and high level of detail. To add onto that as well, I also did test Ra with some of my sibilant test tracks and it performed wonderfully well to keep sibilant under radar.

However, treble extension was where I personally felt Ra was lacking, due to that instruments that is played at high frequencies does not feel quite realistic. Comparatively speaking, while I was swapping back and forth with my reference monitors, Audio Technica ATH-IM02. In summary, if you prioritize treble satisfaction then these may not suit you, but if you’re in the market for something with strong bass, high musicality and without losing detail, Ra does it exceptionally well.



Technicality​

From a technical perspective, soundstage on Ra was average at best. There was decent amount of width but in terms of height, it was surprisingly tall. Interesting enough, due to the exceptional level of airiness coming from the vent ports, I initially thought Ra has a wide soundstage until I went on and play a couple more tracks to confirm my evaluations. Spatial imaging was sligthy above average, it was quite accurate but not quite as good when compared to the likes of Etymotic Evo which unfortunately I could not compare thoroughly in this review. Regardless, Ra separates handles various elements playing simultaneously well even with busier tracks, it does not sound congested nor resulting to melding. Layering was average at best, due to the lack of depth some of the instruments and other elements included are pushed into the same row.

Although the tuning on Ra prioritizes smoothness and musicality, these does not felt lacking in detail. Macrodetails and small nuances are present yet not overdone, however the overall resolution was only as far as average. Lastly, wraping it off with the dynamic range test for Ra is rated at average. Utilizing the Ultimate Headphone Test - ABYSS Headphone dynamic range test as a reference. In which explained in short, a sample sound of a drum and a bell are played simultaneously as much as 7 counts, but only the sound of the bells will become quieter. Hence, from a scale of 7 counts, Ra was able to produce an audible 5 out of 7 counts.



Comparison(s)​

1000073769.jpg
1000074649.jpg

  • Audio Technica ATH-IM02
Even from the graph one could tell that Ra is much bassier than the IM02 by a long shot, pretty much beats it easily in the bass department with ease. That being said, IM02 provides better resolution and overall cleaner bass response compared to Ra which has a slight bass bleed into the lower-mids. In the midrange and treble, is where the IM02 shines due to the differences in its tuning.
Upper-mids are much more forward, natural and analog sounding, however Ra handles midrange detail a tad better with blacker background. Treble on both monitors are similarly relaxing and very smooth. Unfortunately, as I mentioned about the lack of extension on Ra was also where the IM02 simply outshines it including other technical aspects such as detail resolution, dynamic range and soundstaging.
  • Etymotic Evo
For this one, I have to do it by memory since I only manage to compare both of these side by side for less than 10 minutes. Hence, I will not go into detail regarding these two and only compare the attributes that I could recall. Most obviously when comparing both, soundstaging, detail retrieval and resolution on Evo was night and day clearly blows Ra out of the park.
Both monitors does go deep into the sub-bass, however Ra does a better job at definition and packs more weight but Evo handled texture a tad better and detailed. Midrange was obviously leaner with colder tonal balance on the Evo. Treble was much more exciting and crisper on Evo, while Ra had a fuller treble note. Both monitors have similar problems when it comes to treble extension, but Evo has a slight advantage over Ra.



Eartip Combination(s)​

1000077600.jpg

AO Ra with the provided stock pair of eartips which were used throughout the sound evaluation.

  • E Pro EP00
One of my favourite pairing combination with the Ra, great increase in the midrange quality, vocals are much more forward with better clarity. Bass slam were tighter and controlled. Treble is a tad subdued but in return, it yields greater treble extension and much natural soundstage, airiness were not affected in any negative manner.
  • Azla Xelastec
Also my favourites, sounds similar to the EP00 for most parts, although treble is much crisper, more sparkle and detail retrieval with these. Airiness stays similar but with soundstaging sounded a tad boxy. Provides much secure seal and requires less adjustment into the ear canal compared to EP00.
  • Tangzu Tang Sancai (Balanced)
Sounds most balance with the Ra, bass slam feels woolly, rounded and immersive. Midrange is still recessed but brought slightly forward than stock.
  • Triple Flange
Similar to Tang Sancai, kept most of the bass quantity. The difference between both is that triple flange sounds a tad tighter. Soundstaging however, was the narrowest out of the bunch, but instead you will get the best detail retrieval due to its being closer to eardrum.
  • Dunu S&S
Decent combination, sounds similar to stock but with slightly much forward midrange. Treble were splashy unfortunately.



Purchasing Links and Where to Get​

Alpha Omega Official Website
https://www.alphaomegaciem.com/ra



Conclusion​

While I was sitting down and just take a moment to appreciate a sound signature that is north by miles away from my flat neutral preference. I could see how Ra would slot itself quite easily to those who would want an upgrade from for example, Thieaudio Hype 2 or such monitors that is similar to that and definitely for bassheads as well. Ra was definitely also sound way different to the last couple of models from AO I have tested from the past. It felt much more safer, friendly and forgiving compared to the Lambda, Zeta, Iota or even their first flagship Omegon MKI. Considering the amount of premium components you would get, such as dual Sonion EST units (per side) below $600 price tag, comparatively less than how much other premium brands would offer does make it a good deal.

Despite some setbacks, Ra is still in my opinion a very good pair of in-ear monitors goes absolutely perfect for relaxing, casual listening when you’re commuting and need something in your ears that sounds good. The Ra has a mildly V-shape curve, while some might assume its U-shape by referring from the official graph. Regardless, main point here it that Ra could provides listener a full blanket of warm bass due to the elevated +13dB sub-bass region. Bass slams are also powerful with great depth yet still nicely articulated. AO’s clever tuning allows the midrange and upper-mids on Ra to maintain good forwardness and naturalness, thanks to the scoop within pinna gain area. Last but not least, the implemented in-house developed pressure venting system allows the Ra to sound airy and overall absolutely pleasant to hear.

As a final thought, I’m thoroughly glad that AO has come out with new releases, expanding their catalogue and improving their portfolio gathering fans from inside and outside of the country. Thus, wrapping up my review for this time and hopefully we will see more interesting releases from Alpha Omega in the future!



Test Tracks

Untuk Perempuan Yang Sedang Di Pelukan - Payung Teduh 44.1kHz

A Poem Titled You – Taeyeon 44.1kHz

Anesthetize (Live) – Porcupine Tree DSD256

The Devil in I - Slipknot44.1kHz

Hunter – Björk 44.1kHz

Hollow (16-Bit Remix) – Björk 44.1kHz

La vaguelette (Original Game Soundtrack) - HOYO-MiX 44.1kHz

Rythm - Jamey Haddad; Lenny White; Mark Sherman 44.1kHz

Kimigatame - SuaraDSD11.2MHz

Furiko – Uru 44.1kHz

Automatic - Hikaru Utada 44.1kHz

In My Room - Hikaru Utada 44.1kHz

Colors (Live in Studio) - Black Pumas 192kHz

Timbres – Yosi Horikawa 44.1kHz

Aquatic Mouth Dance – Red Hot Chilli Peppers 192kHz
Last edited:

n0varay

New Head-Fier
Pros: > Premium aesthetics, quality build and material
> Thick angled earpads provide a comfortable wearing experience
> Easy to drive
> Neutral, reference flat tuning
> Highly detailed
> Forward, intimate warm midrange
Cons: > Slightly rough in terms of finish, mainly on the head structure
> Lacking treble extension

AUNE AR5000 - Fruitful Venture Into The Unprecedented​


1000064305.jpg


Disclaimer​

  • The reviewed Aune AR5000 is a personal unit. Thus, all opinions are original ideas and there is zero influence from any 3rd party or external opinion.
  • No EQ or filter presets were used during the entire review period.
  • Sound evaluations are strictly conducted under neutral and does not include 3rd party accessories (ie; eartips/earpads, cable, reversible mods).


Introduction​

Aune is a brand that has been in the Chi-Fi market for as long as one could remember back when one first began foraying into this hobby, having own their X7s which I had use as a reference amplifier back then. Known vastly for their desktop headphone amplifiers and DACs, Aune has made some top quality bangers such as the S7 Pro, X8 Magic DAC and much more. That being said, in recent times Aune has once again stepped their foot as an active player once again with some of their new releases such as the AUNE Yuki dongle DAC/AMP, X1s GT DAC, and X8 XVIII BT Magic DAC.

However, with me in this review is the recently released and Aune’s first-ever venture into full-sized headphone segment, which is the AR5000. Priced at $299 on their store and Amazon, the AR5000 features a fully open-back structure with dual detachable cable design and at the heart of this headphone is equipped with a large 50mm dynamic driver alongside a newly developed MLD (Multi-Layer Distributed) diaphragm, tilted driver placement and plenty more features which can be found on their official website.


Unboxing Experience​

1000064333.jpg


Simplicity and elegance, are the words best to describe the whole unboxing experience of the AR5000. To start off, the headphone came in a fairly large and heavy box with the outer layer is a piece of cardboard that slides outward revealing the actual packaging which stores the headphone itself.

But first, let us view at the outer packaging itself that can be seen has an embossed printing of the actual headphone. While on the sides and back, can be found the lists of specifications, including all of the branding, technologies and marketing details for the headphone. Now, moving to what is inside the box is the gem itself, the AR5000 resting elegantly and snug in its heavily padded throne covered with high quality golden satin fabric. Aune definitely has thrown everything all out through the roof, in terms of presentation for the AR5000.

Additionally, there is a dual 3.5mm terminated to a single-ended 3.5mm jack cable included as well. Which can be found inside a cardboard box compartment below the headphone that also features an embossed printing of the AR5000 model.



Specifications​

  • Driver: 50mm dynamic driver, MLD (Multi-Layer Distributed) diaphragm
  • Impedance: 28 Ohms
  • Frequency Response: 5-41800hz
  • Cable: 4 core, OFC (Oxygen-Free Copper), dual 3.5mm to 3.5mm, 1.5m length cable
  • Weight: 350g



Purchasing Links and Where to Get​

Amazon link:

https://www.amazon.com/Aune-Full-Size-Headphones-Detachable-Audiophile/dp/B0CLPC7Q2S

Aune Store:

https://www.aune-store.com/en/aune-ar5000-open-ear-headphone_110208_1240/



Build and Comfort​

Featuring a open-back and bulky design yet weighing at just 350 grams, the AR5000 somewhat still manages to place itself within the lightweight category thanks to its build. Aune mostly utilizes high-grade plastic components as what you would find in similarly priced headphones for majority of the parts such as the earcups, headband adjustment mechanism. Aune also has opted for metal on the headband structure, yoke and grills which protects the driver housing. Despite that being the case, the finishing on metal parts mainly are finished poorly and rough, which potentially might cut through your skin if its not handled cautiously. Each respective side of the yoke has an indicator, written “L” and ”R” for users to recognize the appropriate direction for use and plugging In the cable.

Additionally, the headband itself is made out of polyurethane (PU) leather which distributes the weight of the headphone exceptionally well. The pre-attached angled hybrid earpads are easily replaceable without any sort of proprietary locking mechanism. The earpads are made with fenestrated PU leather on the outer wall and mesh interior. It is fairly thick and has a large cavity which can fit four knuckles quite easily, the angled driver design also ensure most ears does not come in contact directly with the driver housing.

Clamping force is fairly secure and snug, although the AR5000 presence is noticeable throughout the whole usage. Its overall weight distribution and comfortable earpads provides a superbly pleasant experience. Likewise with many other headphone that shares similar design, the AR5000 does not isolate external noise. Due to its open-back design as well, this headphones leak sound fairly easy, hence its best to keep this headphone indoors to fully appreciate the sound quality that this headphone has.

Cable​

1000040768.jpg


Apart from the original stock, Aune was generous enough to include their recommended upgrade balanced cable for the AR5000 as a free gift, which is the Aune AR3. Regardless, straight out of the package users will get a dual 3.5mm to 3.5mm single-ended termination. AUNE does not specify what kind of material they have used for the stock cable in the specification sheet. Nonetheless, it features a two-braid cable, covered in fabric insulation, measured at 1.5 meter in length which is standard. Each end of the connectors including the Y-splitter are made out of metal with a brushed matte finish. Plus, each side of the jacks are also indicated “L” and ”R” on each side of the connector housing. Overall, it is a good quality, lightweight and beautifully made cable, although that being said it is slightly microphonic when in contact with fabric.

1000064329.jpg

Next, onto the Aune AR3 cable which is sold separately that can be found on their website, selling for a reasonable price of $80. According to their website, this cable features a heavier four-braid, 6N OCC (Ohno Continuous Casting) with Litz Type 2 copper cable. Again, dual 3.5mm connectors both indicated for each side but only this time it is terminated to a 4.4mm Pentaconn plug. Other than that, the overall finish on the connectors and Y-splitter is decorated with a shinier stainless steel housing which looks gorgeous under the lights. The AR3 eliminates all of the microphonic problem that the stock cable has, since it is insulated with soft TPEE material that feels a tad tacky to the touch.

For those who might question about sonic differences or cable geeks, on multiple listening test conducted, switching back and forth between the cables. The AR3 provides better resolution, better separation and looser mid-bass impact compared to the stock cable by a small margin.



Test Equipment​

  • Local Hi-Res files > Astell & Kern SE100 M.Chat (Linear Phase Fast Roll-off Filter > 2.5mm balanced output)
  • Tidal (Master) + Local Hi-Res files via Sony Music Centre > Sony Xperia 1 V (DSEE Ultimate + Dolby Atmos - OFF)
  • Lenovo Legion 5 (Nahimic - OFF) > foobar2000 > Chord Mojo 2



Power Requirements​

Despite its large drivers and beefy appearance, the AR5000 is in fact a superbly efficient pair of headphones which can be driven optimally through most devices including the Sony Xperia 1 V which has a considerably underpowered amplifier for most full-sized headphones.

Driving it through the A&K SE100 on 2.5mm balanced connection which has a decent 4.1 Vrms of output power, the AR5000 sounds loud and crystal clear at 35-40/150 on the volume wheel for my personal listening. Thus, most modern dongles should have absolutely no problem to provide enough juice to make this headphone really sing its heart out.



Initial Impression​

1000064328.jpg


“Wait, this sounds oddly familiar?”

That was the question I asked myself first time hearing the AR5000. Wacky as it seem, it reminds me so much to the legendary Sennheiser HD600 series which has been the gold standard, for audiophiles of all extend. Glad that I finally have tried all models in the series not too long ago, during my recent visit to the store.

Unfortunately, I could not propose a direct, true comparison between the HD600 and AR5000 in this review since impressions based on memory muscles will affect the reliability of my evaluations.

Before someone would make any dubious speculation, it does not mean Aune was trying to imitate the HD600 series. Perhaps, one can say it is inspired by the veteran because despite the similarities, the AR5000 has a character of its own especially in the upper-mids and treble range which made this pair distinctively different. The overall sound signature is reference neutral and tuned as flat as it can be. Sub-bass roll-off has a slightly early roll-off yet at the same time still warm and lush, reminiscent to the HD600 series except the AR5000 does not sound neither velvety or as smooth as its counterpart. It sounded a tad more gritty, somewhat emphasized not deliberately yet still creates an over-sharpened image within the 2.5k-5kHz region.



Low Frequency (Bass)​

Reference tuning often prioritize neutrality and the importance of unaltered reproduction of sound as minimal as it can, especially within the low frequency region. This applies towards the overall bass for the AR5000, it has a flat, reference-like sounding bass with minimal colouration which is perfect for monitoring and mixing use. Do not be mistaken reference neutral to be sterile or cold, because the AR5000 is clearly none of those. The overall timbre and tonality is surprisingly warm, natural and lifelike.

Due to the aforementioned early sub-bass roll-off, the AR5000 does definitely struggles to deliver satisfying level of thick rumbling low-bass performance. Regardless, the gentle rumbling effect that this headphone could do has good amount of definition and texture at macro and micro levels. For example, during the first 30-seconds entering the track Hollow (16 bit Remix) – Björk, the AR5000 renders the deep rumbling sub-bass effect pristine, as the large 50mm dynamic drivers deliver macro details and texture competently.

Furthermore, shifting slightly higher into the mid and upper-bass region, the AR5000 has more than sufficient energy to present tight and controlled bass impact which resembled in a polite “thud”. Since this headphone fell short in terms of bass extension as well, this indirectly affect the overall dynamics and depth. 7 rings - Ariana Grande, is an exemplary example to test the capability on bass slam and delivery. In this song, bass transients for this headphone which is the length of reverberation from loudest to quietest was short, tactile with average layering.

Middle Frequency (Mid)​

Midrange is the key strength on this pair, whereby tonal balance or colouration in the mids were mainly on the warmer side. Vocals are superbly articulated, natural sounding and detailed. Similarly for string instruments and percussion, timbre was accurate with instruments are easily distinguishable and note weight were also above my expectations, harmoniously balance between organically warm and reference flat. Listening to First Love - Hikaru Utada and Kokoroe (FROM THE FIRST TAKE) - Uru was an absolute bliss and thoroughly impressed by how the vocals are separated with forward warm presentation and pristine. However, due to the upper-mid boost the AR5000 it may sound a tad too forward and not as velvety which can be solved through EQ by lowering frequencies between 2.5k-5kHz.

High Frequency (Treble)​

Overall, as per said in the initial impression the top-end on AR5000 does sound similar of the Sennheiser HD600, but not entirely the same either. The AR5000 has a pleasant lively treble, fairly crisp with good treble energy. Detail is astoundingly good and forgiving even with poorly recorded tracks, plus devoid from any sibilant within the 5k-8kHz region. Sound of crashes, hi-hats in such tracks like Anesthetize – Porcupine Tree and violins in Underground – Lindsey Stirling reproduced by the AR5000 has good energy and a tad edgy texture, which one does not see as any sort of negativity as it aids to highlight contour of note weight and timbre of those elements.

Furthermore, treble extension is marginally lacking resulting shorter and faster roll-off in the upper-treble range but still maintains good level of airiness, keeping the ambience natural and roomy.



Technicality​

Aune AR5000 achieves balance harmony between pleasure and competent level of technical prowess. When it comes to detail retrieval, the AR5000 provides it so effortlessly without being too clinical, like squinting into a magnifying glass. Macro and microdetails are in every song are audible, although that being said the overall resolution this headphone produce was average at best. Soundstaging and spatial imaging were average at best, yet natural thanks to the fully-open back design, nevertheless the width of the soundstage generated by this pair is greater compared to it’s depth. Rhythm – Jamey Haddad; Lenny White; Mark Sherman is a regular track to test these criteria, the AR5000 was able to present high and low levels of details in this binaural recording. Entering midway into the track, the AR5000 renders the movement of cowbell, castanets and maracas being hit while moving were accurate but not at pinpoint level of resolution.

Additionally, the AR5000 possesses very good separation capability elements are all neatly presented and cohesive hindered from any melding. In Aquatic Mouth Dance – Red Hot Chili Peppers to test the separation that the AR5000 could produce, every elements in this track are audible and separated from each other from the start till the closing stages of the track which is the bussiest part, the AR5000 shows no sign of melding. Lastly, the dynamic range test for the Aune AR5000 is rated at average. Utilizing the Ultimate Headphone Test – ABYSS Headphone dynamic range test as a reference. In which explained in short, a sample sound of a drum and a bell are played simultaneously as much as 7 counts, but only the sound of the bells will become quieter. Hence, from a scale of 7 counts, the AR5000 was able to produce an audible 5 out of 7 counts.



Comparison (s)​

1000064360.jpg

AKG K550 MKI ($300)

  • AR5000 relishes a much reference flat tuning compared to the K550, which has an emphasized bass and heavier bass slam. Sub-bass texture is much more complex with greater resolution on the K550, but the AR5000 in the other hand present tighter and faster bass transient.
  • Due to the bassier approach, midrange on the K550 sounded a tad recessed and less forward but positively this old yet still competent performer from 14 years ago, has a much velvety upper-midrange. Both headphones handles vocal very well, detailed and clean, but AR5000 has a warmer, richer tonal balance compared to the K550.
  • Treble is noticeably much brighter and sparkly with greater extension and dynamic range on the K550. Despite being a closed-back headphone, the K550 has a wider width and deeper depth in terms of soundstaging but not at natural sounding likewise with the AR5000. Additionally, the K550 has better detail resolution whereas the AR5000 has a much superior detail retrieval capability. Overall, its fascinating to see how much the AKG still fares head-to-head against a technologically advanced headphone such as the AR5000.




Conclusion​

Aune has ventured into unscathed segment with a strong statement with the AR5000. Although, this pair is regarded as a neutral, reference tuned headphone. It can certainly blend with most genres and apparently versatile for both reference task and for pure music enjoyment. I can imagine that the AR5000 would pair very well with OTL tubes amplifiers, while tuning into some warm, comforting all-time favourite tunes for hours without feeling any discomfort.

That being said, perhaps Aune could place a bit more emphasis on improvising and refine the overall finish of their future product. Despite this being their first ever foray into the headphone market, one could not help but thoroughly impressed with the overall quality from the presentation, material chosen for the build and tuning itself at an affordable price. Thus, that wraps up my review this time, hope it helps and see you all in my next review.





Additional Test Tracks

A Poem Titled You – Taeyeon 44.1kHz

Anesthetize (Live) – Porcupine Tree DSD256

Hunter – Björk 44.1kHz

La vaguelette (Original Game Soundtrack) - HOYO-MiX 48kHz

Kimigatame - Suara DSD11.2MHz

Furiko – Uru 44.1kHz

Automatic - Hikaru Utada 44.1kHz

Artemis - Lindsey Stirling 44.1kHz

Timbres – Yosi Horikawa 44.1kHz

Poster Child – Red Hot Chilli Peppers 192kHz

Attachments

  • 1000064333.jpg
    1000064333.jpg
    3.7 MB · Views: 0
  • 1000064305.jpg
    1000064305.jpg
    6.7 MB · Views: 0
  • 1000064328.jpg
    1000064328.jpg
    8.9 MB · Views: 0
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Desuwas

n0varay

New Head-Fier
Pros: > Superb build quality
> Ergonomic, comfy shaped shell
> Fully accessories
> Fun, warm timbre and tone
> Decent overall clarity
> Superb musicality
> Amazing bass amount and response with a deep bass
> Good sub-bass extension
> Good transparency
> Energetic, airy high range
> Intense, fun treble
> Good overall technicalities
> Good soundstage width and height
Cons: < Recessed midrange
< Slight BA timbre
< Average resolution
< Needs a good and powerful source matching
< Not a clinical performer
< Not for monitoring
< Cables a little cheap looking
< Competitive market and price segment
< Might be too bassy or too piercing with certain sources

BASN Metalen - Caffeine For Ears​


Disclaimer​

  • The following review was written by a fellow reviewer of mine, I'm merely outsharing this review to Head-Fi community on his behalf.
  • Thus, I do not have the rights regarding sound impressions and actual user experience.
  • For further inquiries and clarification regarding this IEM, please do contact Edmund Chan on his Facebook account.


1702847498059.png

1702847553841.png

1702847656920.png
1702847674594.png


BASN which stands for ‘Be A Sincere Newcomer’ is actually not a newcomer in this audio industry but they were established way back in 2009 by an audiophile enthusiast, Louis Lee and they are based in California, USA. They are rarely mentioned here in the audiophile scene in Asia but BASN is quite well known in the west for producing in ear monitors for musicians and producers alike. They have a wide catalogue of products that includes a portable vinyl player and a microphone as well. Perry from BASN has contacted us to introduce our community with their brand and we are thrilled to have this opportunity as we at Audiomonsta are keen to find hidden gems all around the globe for us all to enjoy. BASN has kindly sent us a pair of their 4 drivers IEM, the Metalen for a review and we are truly grateful for the opportunity given. How will they fare in this ever growing portable audio scene? We shall find out here.

Functions & Specifications​

Before we start the review, here are the specifications of the BASN Metalen;

  • Drivers: 2 x 10mm dynamic + 2 balanced armatures
  • 18 Ohms, 102 dB Sensitivity
  • 20 - 20 khz Frequency Response Range
  • CNC Precision titanium Alloy
  • Lightweight Ergonomic Design
  • 2 recessed MMCX silver plated cables (1 x with mic, 1 x 4 core single ended)
  • In green or blue colour


The BASN Metalen can be purchased from their store and Amazon;

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BXPF7VLM/ref=twister_B0BXPJ57JP?_encoding=UTF8&th=1

https://www.basnaudio.com/



Packaging & Accessories​

The packaging here is a simple, straightforward type of retail packaging that looks professional steering away from those over the top anime themes. They are packed like a well established company package with their information on the back inside a medium small box. Inside we will find a plethora of accessories that is worthy of it's asking price which includes 3 pairs of foam tips, 3 pairs of silicone tips, a cleaning tool, a 6.35mm converter, 2 basic cable which consists of 1 with microphone and 1 braided single ended cable, a zipper hard case and the IEM itself. The Metalen is fully accessorised indeed and very neatly packed.

Design​

The design is an ergonomic shaped shell that is quite small in size and they fit into the ear concha snugly giving a superb comfort that is suitable to wear for a long listening session. The Metalen is a CNC machined titanium alloy build that is what I would call solid, seamless and feels premium on hands with a slight weight on it. The overall build is impressive to say the least with their brand logo imprinted on the faceplate. BASN also claims that the titanium alloy that they used is also great in controlling the resonance problem to create a clearer overall sound.

1702847793213.png

1702847822703.png

The Metalen is equipped with 4 drivers which consist of 2 dynamic drivers along with a dual balanced armature. The dynamic drivers are dual 10 mm drivers that are in charge of the lower frequencies towards the midrange along with 2 balanced armature fixed near the nozzle where 1 driver is in charge of the mid to highs region and another for the high region.

The nozzle is rather large in diameter and they are fitted with a metal mesh for protection. There are 2 vents near the nozzle and another vent at the inside of the body providing a well vented IEM that possesses zero driver flex.
1702847848530.png


There are a total of 6 pairs of eartips that consist of 3 pairs of black foam tips and 3 pairs of silicone eartips in normal size bore all in small, medium and large sizes.
1702847864056.png


They come with a silver metallic zippered hard case that is made with some type of fabric that mimics a steel case. They do offer a great protection for the IEM and are practical for everyday usage.
1702847942300.png


The Metalen has a protruding type of MMCX plugs that is quite different to minimise the swivelling effect of normal MMCX plugs but other 3rd party MMCX can be used without any problems.
1702847984568.png


There are 2 types of silver plated cable included in the package where 1 straight cable with a 3 button microphone that has a rubbery body and they are quite sticky to the touch and another single ended cable in 3.5mm 4 core braided cable. Both of these cables are fitted with ear guides with memory metal inside to form a better fit on your ears. The cables honestly looked a little on the cheaper side and I would prefer a single good quality cable instead of 2 cheaper ones.
1702848019726.png

1702848040716.png


Gears Used for Comparisons​

  • Shanling M6 Ultra
  • Fiio Q7
  • Questyle M15
  • Hiby FC6
  • FiiO BTR7
  • Intime Sho DD
  • Letshuoer DZ4
  • Kinera Idun Gold 2.0
  • Tinhifi P1Max Panda
  • BQEYZ Wind
  • Hidizs MD4
  • Moondrop A8
  • Unique Melody 3DT
  • Dunu EST112

Songs list​

  • Korn - Freak On A Leash
  • Ning Baizura - Ke Sayup Bintang
  • Nora En Pure - Thermal
  • Celine Dion - Power Of Love
  • Tina Turner - Simply The Best
  • Louis Armstrong- What A Wonderful World
  • Eric Clapton - Blue Eyes Blue
  • Colyn - The Future Is The Past
  • Yellowcard - Ocean Avenue
  • Slipknot - Duality


Tone and Presentation​

The tone of the Metalen is a neutral warm, smooth sound that slightly leans towards a brighter side of the spectrum with a V shaped sound and a healthy dose of bass and treble. Their overall sound is quite clear and energetically fun with a non aggressive yet strong bass and a lively high range. They have a good thick bass and midrange along with a smooth, inoffensive high range that sound unapologetically fun. There is some coloration present here in their midrange that gives music some joyfulness to them but in certain genres like acoustics and classicals, they might sound a tad bit unnatural. Overall technicalities here are solid with a wide dynamic spectrum of sound.

Soundstage​

The Metalen possesses a good, expansive soundstage that is wide but has a mediocre height for their price range. Soundstage here has a good 3D holographic presentation with an accurate placement of sound which may suit a wider audience like gaming or movies. They possess a good air in their presentation that provides an immersive sound especially in the bass region. They also do have a good sized headroom that actually gives a medium sized room feel even for earphones without any boxy feel.

Separation and Timbre​

Separation is great honestly for a hybrid driver and I can't detect any major cohesion problem as the drivers work together harmoniously with no crosstalk issues while producing a great left and right separation that gives music a wider range. Layering is also great as well as no gaps are present in the whole frequency range and they do sound full overall. Timbre here is slightly intense and aggressive while being a little mellow at times but they do have some balanced armature timbre here where the high range does sound a little metallic and unnatural.

Drivability​

The wind is rated at 18 ohms at 102 dB sensitivity which means they aren't as sensitive to pick up noise but they do need some power to perform to their full potential, not much but a little will go a long way. A simple good dongle will suffice but a better source that is well amplified will give the Metalen some extra resolution along with some high range refinements. Source sound matching isn't really a problem as they are quite neutral in their tone but I would prefer a warm source for them as they will sound more intimate. The Metalen is actually quite revealing in nature as they will show flaws in music evidently, so feeding them with good, well mastered tracks will increase their overall performance.


The Bass (Low)​

The bass that the Metalen produces is actually quite good partly due to the dual dynamic setup and they are able to give a deep, meaty, fast bass response that has a lift in the mid bass. It is a boosted warm type of bass that has a slight tightness to their presentation. Details here are good with a bass response that is clean and clear without muddiness, haziness or bleed present here. Bass amount is big but quite well balanced and they are not suitable for bassheads as they are tuned more towards a more natural dynamic bass amount that is fun to listen to. Sub-bass amount here is good and they extend quite deep giving an airy overall bass presentation. The Metalen bass has a more prominent mid bass presentation that gives an immersive bass and they do perform when called upon which make them very suited for EDM, hip-hop hip-hop and jazz genres. Overall, the bass response genre is actually good as they provide a deep and dynamic bass that is accurate and fun to listen to.

The Mids​

Midrange is a warm type of mids that has good intimacy in their sound while giving a clean and clear midrange. They have a rather recessed midrange partly due to their strong bass and highs but the recessed mids do sound a little behind the overall sound of the Metallen which might not suit some vocals driven genres. The midrange does sound intimately warm and there is a sense of space in the presentation. Details here are great with a good macro sound while having a great micro details retrieval with minute sound present without any hitch. Their overall clarity here is also great as their transparency is actually good with a crystal clear sound along with a strong resolution that provides a vivid sound presentation. Vocals here have a brilliance that is great for female driven vocals as they are crisp and snappy while male vocals are acceptable but they do lack a mellow, deep sound due to their recessed nature. There is some coloration here present in the midrange that gives music some lushness and provides a more fun sound but in return, they might sacrifice some naturalness in the music but it is a minor setback.

The Highs​

High range has a forward sound signature that is bright but is smooth sounding enough while being able to keep a good presence and it sounds rather lively. It has great details and clarity that is typical of a balanced armature driven highs. Resolution and transparency here is superb with its high range sounding clean and accurate without any veil. While the Metalen high range has the superb resolving capabilities, they do possess a metallic timbre that is quite typical of a balanced armature driver which can affect the natural state of certain high range but in return, their high range does sound crisp and they certainly has a great sparkly decay that sound energetic and lively. There is a slight bump in the 8 to 10 kHz region that makes the overall high range a little piercing but the amount is just enough for my ears and they are not sibilant nor harsh sounding. Treble is definitely intense here as they are a slightly strong overall high range and this intensity brings a more fun, energetic sound to music but there is a caveat of it being a little fatigue on higher volume on longer periods of listening. Extension here is superb as they have a slow roll off sound that has a good air in their presentation that makes music livelier with a sense of space.


Comparisons​

1702848086085.png

  • VS Kinera Idun Gold 2.0
Kinera is another well known maker of high end products from China and they are famous for their well made in-ears that are housed in high quality hand painted resin shells. The Idun gold 2.0 has a configuration which consists of 1 dynamic with 2 balanced armature. The Idun cost a little more than the Metalen and both have a solid build along with a well accessorised package.

High region​

Highs on the Idun sounded more polished and natural with a greater sense of clarity while the Metalen sounded livelier with a crisper presentation. Details on both are similar but extension is better on the Idun. Idun overall high range is smoother while the Metalen has a more energetic feel.

Midrange​

The Idun midrange has a thicker, more forward presentation with a greater, more vivid resolution and transparency while the Metalen has a more neutral bright style of presentation that is slightly more spacious. Vocals on the Idun do sound lusher and more balanced with more accuracy that blends in with more genres.

Bass​

Bass on the Metalen has the winning hands of being more in their quantity as they are more impactful, meatier, deeper and more authoritative while having the same amount of details with the idun. Sub-bass extension is similar but the Metalen sub-bass has a stronger presence.

Soundstage​

The soundstage on the Idun is slightly wider with a similar height. Headroom on the Idun is bigger and has more air.

  • VS Letshuoer DZ4
The DZ4 is one of the latest products from Letshuoer China and they are equipped with triple dynamic driver along with a passive radiator. Both of these products are priced similarly and both have a great, solid design along with a fully accessorised package.

High region​

The highs of the Metalen have a stronger presence with a crisper, more sparkly high range. DZ4 high range has more air along with a slightly better detail retrieval abilities and they do sound natural. Metalen has more energy and bite here along with better brilliance that gives more life into music.

Midrange​

Midrange on DZ4 is not as recessed and they have a more natural, organic take on the mids. Resolution is also better on the DZ4 but transparency wise is better on the Metalen. Both have a good detail retrieval but the Metalen has a better micro detail presentation. Metalen mids is tuned towards a female brilliance type while the DZ4 is more balanced.

Bass​

The amount of bass in Metalen is more apparent with a stronger, more dynamic bass response versus the flat bass of the DZ4. While the bass on the DZ4 is more accurate, the bass on the Metalen has more energy and they are indeed more fun to listen to.

Soundstage​

Soundstage height is similar but depth is better on the DZ4 with a similar big headroom size and both have a good air in their presentation.


Synergy​

  • Questyle M15
The Questyle M15 is my go-to portable DAC/amplifier with Questyle's signature direct current amplification and they are a neutral to bright sounding device suitable for a portable usage. The M15 does possess a great extension on both ends displaying none of the Sabre chip glare.

Bass sounded clearer and tighter with details and clarity presented cleaner. The bass has a leaner presentation and has a better texturing that gives the overall bass more natural. Sub-bass depth remained mostly the same but they do sound cleaner and clearer overall.

Midrange is less recessed and possesses better resolution producing a more vivid sound while retaining the warmth and their clarity. Vocals sound lusher and more balanced with a more controlled mid high range along with a more spacious feel.

High range has a less spiky treble and better sparkle with a more extended range along with a slight reduction in their metallic sound. Treble has slightly toned down in intensity and they are still very well controlled with an increase in their airiness.

Soundstage has seen improved width and height.

  • FiiO Q7
The Q7 is a beast of a transportable DAC amplifier that is the flagship in the Q series in FiiO. They are equipped with a single Sabre ES9038pro dac chip along with dual THX 788+ boasting a 3000 mw power with the DC adapter. They have a bright to warm sound that has tons of power to drive any IEMs and most of the headphones around.

Bass has better texture and they have a tighter bass slam that sounds more controlled. They have a cleaner sub-bass extension with a slightly deeper rumble. Details and clarity has a slight increase and they do sound airier with a cleaner bass response.

Midrange has a more intimate presentation along with a more resolving sound. They might make music a little more forward but they are still a little recessed. Micro details seem more evident mildly while macro details apparently sound clearer. The midrange also does sound more spacious with some air added and a more accurate placement.

Highs has a more controlled, less spiky sparkle added and has a better extension along with a crisper sound added. Details and clarity stayed the same but they sound more extended with an airier presentation. They are still a little fatiguing in loud volumes but still managed to sound very well in control.

Soundstage height and width is better with a wider, airier sound overall.


Who Is It For?​

The Metalen is for someone who wants a pure fun, well built hybrid IEM that has a solid bass response and a sparkly high range that certainly sounds addicting. They might satisfy light bass heads out there but not for hardcore basshead. For those who look for a bold sound but still very in control, the Metalen do the job decently. For EDM, Hip-hop and Jazz, the Metalen does excel due to their deep low end but not really suited for acoustics as they do have a recessed midrange. The Metalen is also suited for gaming and movies for their wide, accurate sound placements along with an immersive sound.


Final Words​

Being the first IEM that I ever tried from BASN, the Metalen actually surprised me for their bold sound as a sound like this is getting more and more rare. With their amazing deep bass response and energetic high range, they are without a doubt a fun IEM to listen to. Though they are a V shaped sound that purists might not like, they are great for times to just enjoy the music and they are quite addicting for me just like a pick me up coffee in the morning to refresh my mind. It is also hard not to love their original, ergonomic design and a solid titanium alloy body that fits like a glove. A good introduction for BASN indeed as the Metalen is a hidden gem that might be the one you are looking for. Great job BASN.


  • Tone and presentation : 9/10
  • Build and design : 9/10
  • Separation and timbre : 8/10
  • Soundstage : 8/10
  • Bass : 9/10
  • Midrange : 7/10
  • Highs : 8/10
  • Value : 9/10

Attachments

  • 1702847604300.png
    1702847604300.png
    1.1 MB · Views: 0
  • 1702848108236.png
    1702848108236.png
    2.6 MB · Views: 0
  • Like
Reactions: Ronnie frown
Ronnie frown
Ronnie frown
Great review, thank you

n0varay

New Head-Fier
Pros: > Low-end galore!
> Cozy, smooth laid-back sound signature with warm tonal balance
> Tall, expansive soundstaging width and height
> High quality, robust copper alloy build
> Sufficient amount of inclusions (ie; eartips, accessories)
> Priced slightly cheaper to its predecesor
Cons: < Thin, supposedly marketed as "upgraded" cable
< Decent technical performance
< Slightly unrealistic mid to upper-midrange timbre
< Requires short period of burn-in
< Comfy yet heavy

iKKO Sapphire Mirage OH10S – Mellowing Mirage​




IMG_20230925_140637.jpg



Disclaimer
  • The reviewed equipment is a demo unit sent by Red Ape – Headphone Store Malaysia in exchange for a review. Regardless, all opinions remains original ideas, thus there is zero influence from any 3rd party or external opinions.
  • No EQ or filter presets were used during the entire review period.
  • Sound evaluation are kept neutral and does not include 3rd party accessories (ie; eartips, cable, reversible mods).
  • Burn-in was done for 50 hours prior to review.


Introduction
Typically, at a start of a headgear review, most often it will take the audience to a journey to get to know the background of the brand. In this review however, let us start it off slightly with an unorthodox way by introducing to all a slice of history about the photochromic glass.

Photochromic lenses or glasses were first invented in 1966 by two genius chemist, the idea of this colour shifting glasses are founded by Dr. William H. Armistead and S. Donald Stookey at Corning Inc. Despite, their invention were only to be known for its commercial potential in the year of 1991, its existence was a growing demand globally especially with the blooming production of eyewears. These photochromic glasses has a special purpose compared to the typical glass which made it became a sought after material for sunglasses, these glasses are capable of changing colours from crystal clear to a dark hue when exposed to bright source of light (ie: sunlight, LED, etc). Which works as a protective shade against harmful UV radiation, exposure to excessive brightness which can affects the eyesight and much more.

Hence, some must be thinking, “What does photochromatic glasses has anything to do with an IEM review?”.

Without further delaying, with us this time is the iKKO Sapphire Mirage OH10S, the latest update on their best-selling IEM which was the OH10. iKKO has kept the same driver layout to its predecessor which is a hybrid single-dynamic driver (DD) and a single Knowles RAD-33518 balanced armature (BA) unit. There are subtle changes that are brought into the new OH10S such as the brand new titanium-coated single-dynamic, compared to the polymer with titanium coated dome diapghram on the previous model. The crossover circuit has also been replaced with a newer, much advanced circuit.

For your acknowledgement as well, the new OH10S are equipped with a brand new, fresher look and ultimately being significantly cheaper at only $181, compared to the OH10 which was above $200 at the time. iKKO has integrated the purpose of photochromatic glasses onto the faceplate of the OH10S, similarly to their more affordable model the Lumina OH300. As per advertised by iKKO, these unique glasses “protects high-fidelity components from harmful UV rays”. Thus, also made iKKO to become the first brand to introduce the usage of photochromatic glasses into the audio market. With all of that out of the way, let us go straight into today’s review!


Unboxing Experience
The iKKO OH10S is packaged in a fairly mid-sized box with a sleeve mechanism that slides out from the side, which is comparable to a size of the average comic book that is approximately measured 7.5 inches of length and 5.2 inches wide. In front of the box, is printed with glossy illustrations of the OH10S alongside iKKO’s branding and a Hi-Res audio certification logo. At the side of the box, you can find a specification label regarding the IEM while at the back are printed with all of the features on the brand new OH10S.

IMG_20230929_013804.jpg


Upon revealing the content from the outer sleeve, was a hard cardboard box with an iKKO branding in front that opens up quite elegantly. Looking at the insides, users will be greeted with an envelope containing a warranty card with an appreciation foreword printed and an instruction manual, which ironically for the Lumina OH300. One guessed that is one way to reduce paper and ink waste.

IMG_20230929_014926.jpg


Moving along, users will be directly greeted by the IEM itself resting neatly on a foam tray, there are also other inclusions included such as a premium leather case of unknown source (ie; might be from an animal or synthetic), which is similar to the one with the previous OH10, a gold-plated metal brooch with an iKKO insignia carved in the middle and a set of eartips which is hidden under the leather case. iKKO was generous enough to include 2 sets of eartips of multiple sizes which are of the same kind unfortunately, the only main difference was the colour. Not to forget as well, the main cable for the OH10S is also included which can be found inside the leather case that has a leather cable organizer strap, pre-attached on the cable.


Specification
  • Driver: 10mm Dual-magnet Titanium-coated single-dynamic driver, Knowles RAD-33518
  • Impedance: 18Ω Ohms
  • Sensitivity: 106dB/SPL
  • Frequency Response: 20-40kHz
  • Cable: 1.2 meter, 27um 4-core oxygen free copper (OFC), 3.5mm plug into 2-pin (0.78mm) connector.
  • Tested at MYR850 ($181)


Purchasing Links and Where to Get

The iKKO Sapphire Mirage OH10S can be purchased from Red Ape - Headphone Store as they are an official iKKO distributor in Malaysia.

Shopee: https://shopee.com.my/iKKO-OH10S-10...a3&xptdk=b1324a39-34c4-4cca-b025-ca216df9bba3

For international buyers, the OH10S can be purchased from iKKO's official website (non-affiliated)

iKKO: https://www.ikkoaudio.com/en-eu/products/sapphire-mirage-oh10s-iems


Build and Comfort
Similarly to the OH10, the OH10S were built exceptionally well as the whole housing are made out of solid pure copper alloy with PVD coating, that does came in a hefty package which may weigh similar to the OH10. It unironically also reminds me to other IEMs that shares the same feature which is the Simgot EN1000. The pristine clear photochromic glasses allows us to view directly the design of the new crossover circuit, which I personally became fond of for its uniqueness right away. There are also small indicators for left and right on the PCB, apart from the obviously coloured black and red 2-pin connector socket. I could not test out the colour shifting effect despite had enjoying quite a lot of bright sunshine recently, seems like it requires an intense amount of light to be able to trigger the photochromatic effect from crystal clear to sapphire blue hue.

IMG_20230929_021449.jpg


Moving on, as comfort goes the OH10S are an extremely comfortable of in-ear monitor, despite its weight and large sized housing. The provided eartips ensures a snug and secure fit, which overall this IEM could provide a good level of passive isolation as ambience noise are still audible quite clearly. This is due to the vent holes on the side and on the top of the IEM. Based on personal experience, I could wear the OH10S for at least a 2-3 hours straight before feeling a tad sore around the cochlea due to its sheer weight.


IMG_20230928_044958.jpg


Cable

The included cable for the OH10S is said to be brand new by iKKO in their page and made out of fresh material. Judging from pictures and specifications that can be found online, also taking account of the outer looks it does look identical to the previous cable for the OH10. Perhaps, iKKO could give a clearer and detailed in-depth explaination regarding the supposedly “upgraded” cable rather than a broad general specification. Regardless, the cable is a silver-plated copper (SPC) OFC cable, that is shielded with a modestly thick PVC shielding and robustly made connectors on each ends. Overall, it is quite a thin cable but these do not tangle easily and resistant to microphonic effect as well even when used on-the-go.


Testing Equipment
  • Letshuoer DT02 dongle DAC/AMP (1 Vrms@32 Ohms (SE) dan 2 Vrms@300 Ohms (Bal).
  • SMSL Sanskrit 10th MKII > Aune X7s (2018 ver.) Class-A Headphone AMP
  • Laptop
  • Smartphone
As can be seen through the test equipments list, my opinions will largely caters dongle users only. DAP users and those with high-end, much refined equipments may yield different results.


Power Requirements
For power requirement aspect, the iKKO OH10S was a relatively categorized as an easy to drive IEMs. Although in that regards, it does still benefit from a much powerful source such as, dongles and portable amplifiers despite being rated at a measly 18 Ohm(s) and a sensitivity rating of 106dB/SPL. The OH10S seems to be resistant to high noise floor levels as well, for example when plugged into my regular source which is the Letshuoer DT02 dongle, the OH10S could only detect very minimal amount of hisses despite being on full volume with nothing played.

Using HiBy Music app, combined with the Letshuoer dongle with 3.5mm (SE) output which has a 1Vrms@32 Ohm(s) per channel requires me to crank up to 6-8 via the volume button on my smartphone, which is variable depends on the types of file played (ie; DSD, FLAC) that is a slightly more than most IEMs that I have reviewed in the past.


Initial Impression
The iKKO OH10S is one of those IEMs that needed a sufficient amount of time to settle in before it could work optimally, thankfully this IEM only needed a few 2-3 hours of burn-in. This may indeed be a serious, debateable topic to some but there is no intend to gain one’s trust. Based on my personal experience during the first 15 minutes with the OH10S, it was not that all impressive. Hence, I left the OH10S to continue play for another 2 hours straight on its own. This IEM has an intense shoutiness in the upper-midrange frequency, with a rather loose low-end slam but this effect has somewhat resolved quite wonderfully after the burn-in.

To make things short, this IEM possesses a Harman Target Curve or also commonly recognized as the V-shaped sound signature similarly with the previous OH10, at least if compared via on-paper measurements. Regardless the case, the OH10S are an engaging, laid-back sounding pair of IEM, with a bassy warm tonal balance and character. The low frequencies has real vigor in sense of delivery and slam depth while, the upper mids to high frequencies are fluidly smooth with zero sibilance with both ends of the spectrums equally emphasized. The midrange is slightly on the coloured side giving it an additional amount of warmth, body and note weight to vocals, instruments and etc.

One thing that stands out on the OH10S, is how expansive the soundstaging was which could be elevated from eartips rolling/swapping to memory foams which will be added into the review as we dwell deeper into its detailed sonic explaination. Other aspect of its technicalities are not the main key strength of this IEM but it definitely gets the job done as the OH10S seems to be more suited for those who are looking for an enjoyeable sound profile for daily casual listening or even just to add an another flavour profile in their collection.

1695921636397.png

Diagram 1.1: Frequency response graph of the iKKO Sapphire Mirage OH10S. Courtesy of iKKO


Low Frequency (Bass)
Diving straight deep into the low frequencies, in one of the marketing statement made by iKKO mentioned that the OH10S has new “titanium-coated DD provides powerful bass. From time to time, this sort of sentence are commonly heard but never truly came true, but this certainly was not the case. The brand new OH10S delivers iKKO’s promise, providing a visceral bass delivery, tight and impactful slam with great extension and depth in the mid to upper bass region with very minimal bleed or muddiness that without affecting the rest of the frequencies in severe manner. Despite, have not experienced with the previous OH10 to be able to compare it head-to-head, one was sort of understand why this IEM has gained so much love from audiophiles, bassheads and reviewers alike unscathed by time and technological growth. It is truly one of those timeless IEMs.

Starting from the sub-bass region, the OH10S is a decent performer within capable of rendering deep, rumbling low-end clean and delicately without any melding. Although, the rumble effect was slightly on the softer and polite side, rather than aggressively sending shaking waves to the bones. Sub-bass texture are mainly presented on the macro scale while on the micro side, it is more on the audible level rather than felt. For example, in the track Hollow (16 bit Remix) – Björk, deep rumbling sub-bass effect are easily rendered coming into the first 30-seconds into the song, at the lowest part of the bass which is around 30Hz the OH10S simply could not catch up with the track.

Furthermore, as we rise higher into the mid to upper bass region, the OH10S delivers it in a vigorous manner, bold yet controlled with powerful presence which was highly engaging. For instance, in the track Hunter Björk, each bass slam was rapid and resembled a thick, enormous “thud” sound, which then followed through with great amount of bass depth and extension. Bass decay is on the slower side yet its maturedly controlled and will only linger longer when called upon, hence during rapid bass transients it would not meld together which often times the cause of congestion.

Middle Frequency (Mid)
Next, moving into the midrange of the iKKO OH10S, it can be described that this IEM has a slight coloured mids with its tonal balance is skewed more towards the warmer, natural signature. Presentation wise, are slightly recessed yet modestly engaging which is not a surprise considering the tuning is vastly based on Harman Target Curve. Nonetheless, that being said the OH10S exudes a clean, clear midrange without being affected much by any possible muddiness nor haziness.

The OH10S is a highly versatile pair of IEM, it could handle most acoustic tracks, orchestral or even vocal heavy tracks that it once cannot due to the intensely shouty upper midrange, but thankfully it can be resolved via a short period of burn-in process. Tuning into the usual track which is Whiskey Lullaby (ft. Alison Krauss) – Brad Paisley, the OH10S replicated the throaty and musky male vocal well with clear articulation between each lyrics, despite being averagely detailed with texture wise was on the softer side. Sounds from the acoustic guitar in the background sounded almost natural and organic, with only a slight amount of unrealistic digital sounding timbre was noticeable which is much present in vocals.

While female vocals on the other end sounded sweet, richly warm due to the colouration with very subtle amount of shoutiness. That is, given the circumstances if the OH10S is played with vocal heavy tracks such as Furiko (From THE FIRST TAKE) – Uru, apart from that the OH10S is more than capable to dish out its midrange quality.

High Frequency (Treble)
As we reach to the pinnacle of the frequency, iKKO has done their tuning quite wonderfully in the treble region with the new OH10S. This IEM possesses a superbly airy yet laid-back, smooth inoffensive treble with just the adequate treble energy, without losing its shimmer and brilliance upon feeded with music genres such as ACG (Anime, Comic & Games), K-Pop and so on. It is the sort of IEM that would not offend the listener even at higher listening volume and audience should not mistook it being a dark sounding pair as it is completely not the case.

Tonal balance of the OH10S treble is slightly on the warmer, laid-back nature which makes it great for casual long hours listening. Sibilance nor sharp, harsh edges that is usually the case for IEMs with these sort of tuning yet none to be found on the OH10S. Such as, Ignorance (Acoustic) – Paramore which is a regular track used to detect harsh, peaky high frequencies as the sibilance in this track is accentuated, the OH10S presents this track competently well without causing any discomfort. The sound of tambourine being hit at the background in the track has quite an unnatural timbre, which sounded slightly thin, a tad dull in terms of clarity and fell slightly short to deliver a crisp treble.


Technicality
In terms of technicalities, the OH10S could be simplified being not the sharpest tool in the barn. Detail retrieval were decent at best and only limited to macrodetails which are done quite well, but subtle nuances are barely audible. Hence, it might be a turn-off for someone who prioritize high-level detail rendering with pristine clarity to get the utmost best out of their music.

Other than that, separation and layering was also executed decent as best, as there are sufficient amount of space between elements (ie; vocal, instruments, percussions, etc) without causing much congestions or melding even with busier tracks such as METALI!! (ft. Tom Morello) – BABYMETAL. Although, the bass reditions in the background occasionally meld with the rest of the elements throughout the track. In Mad About You (Live at Koningin Elisabethzaal 2012) – Hooverphonics, due to it is lacking in soundstaging depth some elements in the track like guitar plucks on the southwest direction tend to meld with the violins.

However, the OH10S is impressive in its own separate ways, for example the soundstaging in this IEM was expansive and tall, especially when speaking of width size and height. It is a shame that it was not the same case with its depth, which was decent or average at best and prominent when playing through genres such as Jazz, Orchestral or binaural recordings such as Explorations In Time and Space – Jammey Haddad. Spatial imaging was sharp panning from multiple directions and able to catch up with sounds of moving objects for instance, in the track War – Jammey Haddad whereby there was a cymbal being hit rapidly while moving from behind, front, right to left in a chaotic manner. The OH10S was able to render it accurately with decent amount of clarity.

Thus finally, the dynamic range test for the iKKO OH10S is categorized as above average. Utilizing the Ultimate Headphone Test - ABYSS Headphone dynamic range test as a reference. In which explained in short, a sample sound of a drum and a bell are played simultaneously as much as 7 counts, but only the sound of the bells will become quieter. Hence, from a scale of 7 counts, the OH10S wonderfully able to produce an audible 6 out of 7 counts.


Reversible Modification(s)
As promised, this particular segment is established to find out various reversible modifications that can be made to enhance the sonic quality in a particular way according to one’s liking. Thus, let us start it off for those who prefer thicker, even stronger bass slam for the iKKO OH10S.
  • FiiO HS18
These eartips are specifically made to enhance bass weight and depth for IEMs while being able to retain or even enhance soundstaging. For the OH10S, when paired with this eartips the bass department is increased by a noticeable amount in terms of depth and slam impact, the low-end became slightly looser, bouncier and more evenly distributed compared to the tight “thud” slam with the stock eartips. The expansive soundstaging is retained but with slightly less air compared to the stock eartips due to the greater bass increase, which also even affect the overall detail retrieval and airiness by a slight amount through critical listening, otherwise clarity was not affected.
  • Tangzu Tang Sancai (Balanced)
In my opinion, one of the best pairing for those who search for those who search for a slightly less low-end, much prominent midrange yet still balanced sounding all around with retained tight bass and expansive soundstaging. Despite that being the case, airiness was cut off but a tad amount due to its narrower bore to the stock eartips, but still above the HS18 in regards. Midrange and vocal separation is enhanced by a noticeable amount, plus vocals sounded slightly more prominent, richer and brought forward by pairing the OH10S with these eartips.
  • Acoustune AT02 and Hillaudio Ergo Pro
Both of these eartips are memory foam eartips with medium density, in my personal experience this is also my favourite pairing after the Tangzu Tang Sancai. As the foam eartips, brought greater and natural treble extension, soundstaging and also much well separated alongside the Tangzu Tang Sancai, with the previously known downsides of the OH10S was with the lack of soundstage depth which has became deeper and much more balanced with an airier ambience overall.

Bass department became prominently lesser in quantity but not in short of quality, as it is still tight, rapid and better dispersed or distributed in other word. Midrange still remains lush and rich yet noticeably airier but with lesser and lighter note weight.


Comparison(s)

IMG_20230928_045054.jpg

  • Penon Globe (1DD + 2BA) - $329
Being a more sub-bass focused IEM, the Globe delivers a much greater sub-bass reach and depth compared to the OH10S. Layering was a lot more pronounced and detailed thus, bringing more clarity especially in tracks like Another Chance – Hikaru Utada where there are a lot of subtle bass transients that truly test the capabilities of these IEMs and the Penon Globe came triumph.

Midrange was slightly more pronounced, pristine and life-like compared to the OH10S as the OH10S sounded much digital and less natural to the Globe. Separation was marginally much more well-separated on the Globe with vocals in it’s independent and isolated space with complimented by the rest of the elements being neatly placed compared to the OH10S which aforementioned does suffer from a slight congestion.

Treble on both IEMs are smooth and more on the laid-back nature but the Penon Globe being a tad edgier especially within the 5k~8kHz region while the OH10S was a lot smoother, duller. Both presented commendable amount of airiness, but the OH10S edges it by a slight margin. Once again, the Globe sounded much detailed, benefitting greater clarity from the dual-BA setup but with a tad narrower soundstaging yet much evenly distributed and holographic soundstaging and spatial imaging compared to the OH10S being thinner in depth and less accurate. Overall, the Penon Globe is a greater, worthwhile deal compared to the OH10S which does justify its price gap.

IMG_20230928_044131.jpg

  • Audio Technica ATH-IM02 (2BA) - $299
Despite being a much older pair of IEM, the IM02 does trumple the OH10S in multiple regions. For example, in the midrange department the IM02 presents vocals a lot effortlessly with fuller, richer organic timbre and greater sense of separation between the instruments and other elements. Although, the IM02 is not intended to please those who prefer brighter tonality as some folks might mistook a "detailed" pair of IEMs are most often regarded as "bright", it still delivers macrodetails and micro sublte nuances in music much clearer, greater clarity to the OH10S due to its flatter sound signature.

Regardless, the obvious weakness of this IEM was the soundstaging, that is a lot cramped and smaller compared to the OH10S that has an expansive soundstaging capabilities, as the IM02 is originally an on-stage equipment for live performers. However, that does not deter the IM02 being a much sharper and accurate IEM in terms of spatial imaging.

Apart from that as well, the OH10S delivers greater bass quantity and depth, although both presents bass slam in a similarly tight and engagingly rapid manner. But the OH10S overall will definitely please those who prefer greater bass with a much laid-back and warmer tonality compared to the flatter and truer neutral sound signature with the IM02


Conclusion
All and all, the iKKO Sapphire Mirage OH10S is an impressive bass-oriented pair of IEMs, it was a shame that I could not compare it to its predecessor the OH10. But looking from the frequency response graph it does not look vastly difference from each other, of course without any guarantees on my behalf. Yet it should be a similar resemblance with subtle differences due to the updates on the design and the upgraded driver unit with a much user-friendly cheaper priced to the previous OH10.

While boasting a robust, unprecedented build quality with a solid rating of sound quality, the OH10S could catch up well and deliver its job wonderfully with most genres that one could thrown at with its laid-back, warm and relaxing tonality. That being said, to get the most out of this IEM, it is recommended to let it settle in for a solid one hour or even more amount of playtime as it could sound severely shouty out of the box. Plus, the OH10S is also an IEM that benefits well from a much powerful source but that does not mean one should have to spend kilobucks amount of their hard-earned cash in search of the perfect source for this IEM.

Regardless, I would like to take this chance to send my appreciations to Red Ape – Headphone Store for sending a demo unit to make this review possible. Hence, huge shoutout to them for their generosity. Thus, with that will wrap up my review for this time. Till we see on next time!



Additional Test Tracks
A Poem Titled You – Taeyeon 44.1kHz

Anesthetize – Porcupine Tree DSD256

Mediterranean Sundance - Al Di Meola DSD256

Hunter – Björk 44.1kHz

Furiko – Uru 44.1kHz

First Love - Hikaru Utada 44.1kHz

Artemis - Lindsey Stirling 44.1kHz

Timbres – Yosi Horikawa 44.1kHz

Poster Child – Red Hot Chili Peppers 192kHz
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Insider K

n0varay

New Head-Fier
Pros: > Based on Harman 2019 Target Curve with greater bass extension
> Musical sound signature, with up to three pneumatic tuning nozzles to choose
> Intoxicatingly warm midrange tonal balance
> Crisp treble, highly resolving with great amount of clarity
> Robust, well-made build and unique look
> Abundance amount of accessories (ie; eartips, faux leather pouch and etc)
> High-quality stock cable
> Efficiently easy to drive
Cons: < Fatiguing 5k~8kHz peakiness, causes of sibilance and sharp upper-treble
< Sub-bass lacks texture
< Slight bass bleed, muddy with the Red nozzles
< Muted higher frequencies and dull technicalities with Red nozzles
< Product presentation could be further improved in-terms of user-friendliness

Hidizs Mermaid MS3 – One Pedantic, Alluring Mermaid​




LRM_20230905_193226.jpg


Disclaimer
  • The review equipment is a demo unit sent by Hidizs as a part of a tour review. Regardless, all opinions remains original ideas, thus there is zero influence from any 3rd party or external opinions.
  • No EQ or filter presets were used during the entire review period.
  • Sound evaluation are kept neutral and does not include 3rd party accessories (ie; eartips, cable, reversible mods).
  • Burn-in was done for 100 hours prior to review.


Introduction
Hidizs is one of the names that has shone itself in the Chi-Fi market spotlights in recent times, amidst the vast sea of IEMs especially within below the $200 price tag. Earlier this year Hidizs has released a brand new flagship, which was the Mermaid MS5. Boasting a 5-driver hybrid design featuring 4 units of Sonion balanced armature and a customly made dynamic driver. Starting on that point, Hidizs seemed to be venturing much further into the IEM route this year. Upon seeing a massive growth in the current market with recent releases such as the MP145 and an IEM that I will review this time.

In this review, I will cover their very latest addition into their hybrid catalogue which is the Hidizs Mermaid MS3, tested at an affordable $119. It features customizable and hotswappable tuning filters that came in three different tunings to choose from. It also features a brand new 10.2mm with bio-nanofiber composite diaphragm dynamic driver, which was claimed to be independently developed by Hidizs, responsible for delivering low and mid frequencies. While also, supported by an additional of 2 units of Knowles SWFK-31736 balanced armatures that will be the main component responsible for delivering high and extreme-high frequencies.

There was a lot of marketing foreword that are clearly emphasized by Hidizs which can be seen in their official website. Regardless, I am eagered to try their IEMs for the very first time ironically, despite been knowing Hidizs since their older generation DAPs which is the AP80 and the recently covered Hidizs XO dongle DAC. Last but not least, massive appreciations to Ms/Mrs. @Bella Juan and her team at Hidizs for sending in a demo unit for this tour. Thus, with that let us go onto the review of the Hidizs Mermaid MS3!


Unboxing Experience
The Hidizs MS3 came in a superbly compact packaging with no space being left wasted to accommodate unncessarary bells and whistles. The hard cover of the packaging which slides up is decorated with an illustration of the MS3 itself, couple holographic marketing logos including the Hi-Res Audio certification. While, at the other side of the packaging are located all of the detailed specifications and product informations regarding the IEM.

LRM_20230905_180605.jpg


Upon opening the box, the entire package is stacked onto each other perfectly which reminds me a lot to a stackable lunchboxes. On the first layer, users will be greeted by the IEM itself nestling neatly and secure on a thick foam tray with Hidizs motto “Relish Music, Beauty in The Details” printed onto the foam. Pulling the plastic ribbon tab which is glued on the foam trays, unrevealing an another foam tray which accommodates an abundance of eartips from various choices (ie; Vocal, Balanced, Bass) and the tuning filters which are the Silver and Red nozzles with the stock Rose Gold coloured nozzles are pre-attached to the IEM. Third and final layer, is located the accessories box which inside one can find a faux/synthetic leather pouch with the IEM cable inside and a bunch of paperworks including a warranty card

LRM_20230905_181025.jpg


However, as much as I’m happily amused by the inclusions, I could not hinder myself from feeling a tad annoyed by the way the eartips are presented. As can be seen in the photos, the eartips are flushed inside the foam tray and frustratingly difficult to reach without having to reach out for a tweezer or screwdriver to pull it out. Before anyone would say, “Oh, maybe you just have large fingers, no need to be so nitpicky”. As a reviewer and supposed to eyes and ears of consumers, even a measly and miscellaneous aspect like this should have been taken into account and Hidizs should have put a little more thought into it.


Specifications
  • Driver: 10.2mm (PEEK + PU diaphragm) Dual Magnetic Circuit, Dual Cavity Single-dynamic Driver (DD) + 2 unit Knowles SWFK-31736 Composite Balanced Armature (BA)
  • Impedance: 18 Ohm
  • Sensitivity: 122dB
  • Frequency Response: 20Hz-40kHz
  • Cable: 4 core, 192 strands UP-OFC copper cable, 3.5mm to 0.78mm 2-pin connectors (1.2m)


Build and Comfort
Speaking of build, the MS3 features a chassis made out of an aviation-grade aluminium alloy that has undergone 5-axis CNC machining with a handsomely painted anodized matte black finish and fairly slim in profile for a three drivers hybrid IEM. The surface of the IEM feels extremely smooth to the touch ensuring a comfortable wearing even for long hours of listening. There was an engraved 3D artwork on the faceplate of the MS3 which kind of resemble the shape of a spider or perhaps, a wing which does look unique and different to most IEMs.

LRM_20230905_191917.jpg


On the top of each side, are printed the product branding and model, including the directional symbol for left and right channel. Alongside the faceplate of the MS3, are fitted with gold coloured trimmings or brackets, which also same goes for the nozzle bores on each side. The screwing mechanism for the interchangeable tuning nozzles are well-designed, quite shallow yet secure. Despite that being the case, I would personally prefer a deeper screw hole (ie; Simgot EA500). The overall isolation was quite decent as external noise from surroundings can still be heard well, even with a secure, deep insertions with the provided eartips.


LRM_20230905_183942.jpg


Cable
Meanwhile, the included cable are made out of high-quality material, similar kind one would see in a much more expensive IEMs. It also came in two different connections to choose which is the 3.5mm and a 4.4mm Pentaconn balanced. The cable features 4 cores, a total amount of 192 strands of oxygen-free copper (OFC) wires with a thick and durable PVC shielding, immaculate braiding and the “Shark Fin” designed connectors which can be found similar of the flagship MS5 Dark Angel.
It is supposed to provide greater stability thanks to its larger contact surface which prevents bending or snapping compared to conventional 2-pin connectors. Despite not being able to measure the cable myself, Hidizs claimed that it has low impedance level and high transmission effieciency. Tangled cable is not something to be worried with this cable, as it is supple and highly manageable. However, it is a shame that this cable was found to be slightly microphonic, although it is not severe those who prefer uninterrupted audio would definitely taking this point into notice.


Test Equipment
  • Letshuoer DT02 dongle DAC/AMP (1 Vrms@32 Ohms (SE) and 2 Vrms@300 Ohms (Bal)
  • SMSL Sanskrit MKII > Aune X7s
  • Hidizs XO MQA dongle DAC/AMP (78mW+78mW@32Ohm, 3.5mm (SE), 195mW+195mW@32Ohm 2.5mm (BAL))
  • Laptop
  • Smartphone
As can be seen through the test equipments list, my opinions will largely caters dongle users only. DAP users and those with high-end, much refined equipments might experience different results.


Power Requirements
Rated at just a measly 18 Ohm(s) with a high sensitivity of 112 dB, the Hidizs Mermaid MS3 can be driven optimally from just about anything, including a smartphone. Desktop level amplification is simply not needed thanks to its high efficiency. Nonetheless, when the MS3 was plugged across various sources, it does not seem to pick up noise floor level quite easily. Except when plugged into the Letshuoer DT02 dongle DAC/AMP, which has a higher level of nosie floor compared to the cleaner, more silent Hidizs XO. That is said, the hiss it able to pick up does not cause any severe interruption when music is played, the noise seems to only limited when its idle.


Initial Impression
Moving onto the sound impressions, the overall tuning for the Hidizs MS3 is based on the next big thing after the Harman 2016 Target Curve. Which is the latest Harman 2019 Target Curve which overtime saw plenty of Chinese brands are perfecting and adding their own “distinct flavour” which this trend will be expectedly will continue to grow. The sound signature is highly revealing almost like a vividly saturated photo yet engaging thanks to its low-end boost.

Tonality is skewed slightly into the brighter area, but the boosted mid to upper bass helps to minimally mask the brightness. The MS3 is not quite a truly refined pair of IEM, as things get a little offensive and might come across sharp and gritty for those who are sensitive to treble peakiness.

Graph of the Hidizs MS3 with the various tuning nozzles via IEC 711 coupler. 8 kHz is a coupler artefact peak.

Graph of the Hidizs MS3 with the various tuning nozzles via IEC 711 coupler. 8 kHz is a coupler artefact peak. Courtesy of @baskingshark

For the detailed sound evaluation below, the pre-attached Rose Gold nozzles and Balanced eartips are used.

Low Frequency (Bass)
Listening to the album Unplugged – Alice in Chains with the MS3 was an absolute joy, the boosted bass that this IEM possesses compliments with the kick drums in this album as well as other similar genres of music. Each bass slam are delivered in a robust manner and with vigor without being too overwhelming. Although, it is slightly on a boomier side, most of the frequencies are largely heard without causing any severe negativity which might turn some demographs attention away.

Sub-bass for the MS3 extends deep into the 30-50Hz region when tested with Hollow (16-Bit Remix) – Björk as the track enters into the first 30 seconds. Textures as far as concerned is on the softer side, limited to low-level resolution with mediocre layering, which most of it are vastly could only be heard rather than felt with transitions from mid-bass to sub-bass tends to meld together. Mid-bass, as previously mention was on the boomier side, each slam was rich, rapidly fast and bouncy. The MS3 is more than capable to deliver adequate, proper bass weight with the precise amount of depth across music of various genres.

Upper-bass however, does suffer from a slight bleeding which does meld with the lower-mids which is noticeable in vocal-heavy or acoustic tracks, which tend to get slightly muddy. Nonetheless, it does offer greater bass extension, slower lingering decay and reverberations which does suit Rock genres and other similar sub-genres. For example, in the track Psychosocial – Slipknot, renditions of the electric guitar solos are impressively mesmerising, grunting sound from the guitar was deep and extended nicely with a longer tail due to the added bass extension.


Middle Frequency (Mid)
For the midrange, the MS3 are overall vibrant, fairly warm in terms of tonal balance, delivered in an engaging manner with a highly resolving midrange clarity. Presentations of vocals are quite recessed which is not surprising, in-line with most of the instruments. That being said, it has plenty of energy and highly intoxicating which is synonymous with most Chi-Fi, especially when speaking of female vocals which can be occasionally come across to be quite intense. Note weight on the MS3 is precisely defined, noticeably warmer and richer sounding across various elements within the midrange which allows this IEM to perform quite well even in acoustic tracks.

Testing the MS3 midrange capability via Whiskey Lullaby (ft Allison Krauss) – Brad Paisley, male vocals are appropriately throaty while with female vocal it is vibrant, lush and rendered effortlessly. The additional warmth adds greater depth and colour with a sharply defined texture, definitely a key highlight for those who would not want to miss a single detail in their music. Instruments sounded full and defined with real precision and clarity as well, for instance in the track Sludge Factory (Live at the Majestic Theatre, Brooklyn) – Alice in Chains whereby in the acoustic guitar solos sounds saturatedly rich with reverberations at the end of each pluck of the strings are defined with commendable clarity.

Moving onto the upper midrange, is another whole different story. Simply summarized, the upper mids could get a tad gritty especially with female vocals which fortunately unnoticeable when listened casually. Other thing that was noticeable enough was, the midrange on MS3 tend to produce unnaturally nasally sound effect which occurs quite often also in female vocals.


High Frequency (Treble)
As we reached the highest part of the frequencies, the Hidizs has executed the treble response tuning on the MS3 very nicely. It can be described as remarkably crisp, modest level of airiness, capable of rendering high-level details and pinpoint treble timbre. Although, the tonal balance is leaning towards the brighter side of the spectrum, there is a lot to like the treble response of the MS3. Lower and upper treble has abundant amount of energy, with vast range of treble extension and presence which compliments remarkably well with cymbal strikes, hi-hats and crashes that are all well-defined and presented with almost the proper amount of note weight.

Some might be asking what does it mean by “almost the proper amount of note weight”? Long story short, having attended numerous amount of live music performance, the sound coming from the MS3 might come a fraction/slightly too light or thin from reality which, vaguely due to the cause of its brighter tonality. However, despite the praises the MS3 is sharp and coarse/harsh, almost razor sharp due to the peakiness at 8kHz which made the vast majority of the upper mids, up until the upper treble to suffer from sibilance. Despite, the MS3 had already undergone through a total of 100 hours burn-in (ie; physical product burn-in). With thorough listening to compare from pre-, intra- and post-burn in process the sharp sibilance still persists although it is a tad tolerable which might be due to the effects of mental burn-in as well.


Technicality
The Hidizs Mermaid MS3 is a competent pair of IEMs in terms of technicalities, which excels in detail retrieval with ease. Easily said, it is the key highlight for this IEM as it capable of rendering out plenty amount of macrodetails and microdetails with impressive clarity. Although, it would not beat an obvious higher-end option, this IEM could still impress those who loves to get the most out of their music. Its separation was not far off either, as elements are separated well and devoid of causing any melding and congestion even when given busier tracks such as War – Jammey Haddad, which is a binaural recording by Chesky Records from loud hits of war drums to cymbals, to the sound of lingering moving maracas and plenty more.

Soundstaging wise, the MS3 has an average level of width and height, meanwhile depth is a lot enpansive and spaciously roomy. Despite, not having the largest soundstage its airiness is adequate enough to provide an illusion of an expansive ambience. Moreover, spatial imaging is considerably precise, the track Rhythm – Jammey Haddad again is a regular personal track example to find out how precise an imaging on an IEM could get. For the MS3, it could track most of the movements of the wind chimes panning from horizontally and vertically, there are some moments it could the sound was just simply too far that the IEM could not catch up.

Finally, the dynamic range test for the Hidizs was average at best. Utilizing the Ultimate Headphone Test - ABYSS Headphone dynamic range test as a reference. In which explained in short, a sample sound of a drum and a bell are played simultaneously as much as 7 counts, but only the sound of the bells will become quieter. Hence, from a scale of 7 counts, the MS3 was able to produce an almost audible 5 out of 7 counts.


For an additional note, the provided tuning nozzles allowing tuning flexibility for users to better curate their personal preference for this IEM, regardless here are my findings, simplified for the included nozzles with the Rose Gold and Balanced eartips being still the reference;
  • Quiet Silver nozzles;
This particular nozzle does not emit any obvious difference when compared back and forth with the pre-attached Rose Gold nozzles. However, it does shift the 8kHz peakiness to somewhere around 7.5k~8kHz which is a much tolerable sharpness, although this result still might vary from everyone else.
  • Red nozzles;
This nozzle works effectively rising the overall bass-shelf for a warmer, bassy sound signature which does muting the peakiness in the upper-midrange and mid-treble frequencies. However, it does dulls out all the details, clarity and even the airiness that this IEM naturally possesses for the sake of a bassier, darker sound tuning. Plus, speaking of the bleeding which was mentioned earlier into the sound impressions, the now emphasized bass has became muddy and worsen the melding in the sub-bass to mid-bass region.



Comparison(s)

LRM_20230914_140647.jpg

Dressage DS4+2​

While both being similarly a hybrid IEM, the DS4+2 has an advantage with a dual-10mm dynamic driver with two distinct diaphragm which is a liquid crystal polymer (LCP) and a titanium dome in its enclosure. The DS4+2 is similarly bright in terms of tonality, although it is a much leaner and neutral sounding IEM compared to the MS3. The DS4+2 were much capable dishing out more pronounced low-end texture and clarity compared to the MS3, with much rapid and tighter bass response despite its bass slam is slightly on the softer side compared to the fuller, much richer and dynamic MS3.

Midrange sounded a lot neutral and leaner on the DS4+2 as well as being clearly a lot advantageously separated to the MS3 each placement of instruments, precussions as well as vocal are individually separated, although shamefully does also not do well in terms of layering when compared side by side with the MS3. Female and male vocals sounds similarly intoxicating and detailed on both pair with the MS3 being the more fuller, richer sounding, note weight is a lot pronounced and natural as well.

Speaking of treble response, while both has a fair share of sharp sibilance problem. The MS3 edges the DS4+2 by the fraction margin, being able to present a much more vibrant, more clarity and natural tonal balance in terms of realism. Although, that being the case the DS4+2 has a greater, much expansive and roomy soundstaging capabilities. Its dynamic range was clearly greater, wider as well to the MS3, scoring a 6 out of 7 bell counts.


Conclusion

To wrap things up, the Hidizs Mermaid MS3 was overall a tonally warm, engaging, musical sounding pair of IEMs whilst still capable of delivering remarkable amount of details and clarity revealing as much details and subtle nuances it can draw out from your music. I’m thoroughly impressed by what Hidizs has brought into the market despite having only tried their IEMs for the first time. The MS3 compliments very well with genres such as Rock/Metal/Synth Pop and anything that would come across similar.

Implementations of tuning filters enables the flexibility for users to tune the IEM however they would like their sound on the MS3, apart from changing the eartips. Despite, the two nozzles which are the Silver and Rose Gold offers more or less the similar tuning whilst the Red nozzle was a bit of an odd variation coming into this package as it mutes most of the frequencies between upper-mid until mid-treble. Sibilance being the real issue here as well might be a real turn-off for someone who are sensitive to peaky and sharp treble.

Hence, as my verdict the Hidizs MS3 is a very competent performer, there are a lot of things to favour in this tiny package that Hidizs has brought us. I do regularly use the MS3 especially for critical listening, searching for new details in my music and simply savouring the flavour that this IEM had to offer while getting enough playtime for the rest of my application including the one for this review. Thus, with that will wrap up my review for this time, till we see again in the next review.


Additional Test Tracks
A Poem Titled You – Taeyeon 44.1kHz
Anesthetize – Porcupine Tree DSD256
Mediterranean Sundance - Al Di Meola DSD256
Hunter – Björk 44.1kHz
Furiko – Uru 44.1kHz
First Love - Hikaru Utada 44.1kHz
Artemis - Lindsey Stirling 44.1kHz
Timbres – Yosi Horikawa 44.1kHz
Poster Child – Red Hot Chili Peppers 192kHz




International online purchases for the Hidizs Mermaid MS3 can be made via visiting this link (non-affiliated);
https://www.hidizs.net/products/hidizs-ms3-2ba-1dd-hybrid-3-drivers-hifi-in-ear-monitors

For fellow Malaysians, local online purchases can be made via visiting this link;
https://shopee.com.my/Hidizs-MS3-2B...-OFC-Gold-plated-Cable-i.59463211.22273606666

Attachments

  • 1694683631242.png
    1694683631242.png
    174.2 KB · Views: 0
Last edited:

n0varay

New Head-Fier
Pros: > Powerful dual ESS Sabre ES9219C SoCs
> Neutral, analytical reference sound with a tad lower-mid warmth
> Expansive, airy soundstaging
> Capable gushing out tons of micro/macrodetails
> Rigid, smoothly angled aluminium alloy chassis
> Dual filter settings
> Balanced output
> Bobby-dazzling RGB LED light show with 15 effects
Cons: < Digital filter could not be turned off
< Warms up easily even without playing anything, which gets even warmer with the lights on
< Inefficient power rating
< Huge volume gain jump (caution IEM users with low impedance + high sensitivity)
< Absence of gain switch or external volume button for something this powerful
< 2.5mm (BAL) output which rapidly losing relevance

Full Review – Hidizs XO – Incandescent Illuminance

LRM_20230908_224701 (1).jpg


Disclaimer

  • The review equipment is a demo unit sent by Hidizs as a part of a tour review, Hence, massive appreciation to Hidizs and Ms/Mrs. Bella Juan, a representative taking care of this tour for providing this demo unit and making this review possible.
  • Regardless, all opinions remains original ideas, thus there is zero influence from any 3rd party or external opinions.
  • No EQ or 3rd party filter presets were used during the entire review.
  • Sound evaluation are kept neutral from any 3rd party accessories (ie; eartips, 3rd party cable, reversible/unreversible mods)
  • Burn-in was done for 50+ hours prior to review.


Introduction
“How could we make our product stands out the most unique than the rest of our competitors?”

That is the kind of question that begs companies to think out of the box, bolder in marketing their design and providing infinite possible functionality, in order to offer clients and customers a unqiue, one-of-a-kind product that stands out from the rest of the majority. Audio equipments such as DACs and amplifiers mainly regardless of form size, has always been touted with minimalistic, professional designs with little eye-catching details which to some people might have felt a tad “visionless” and “boring”.

What I have today with me is a brand new XO dongle DAC/AMP from Hidizs. Hidizs is a Chinese company typically known for their small DAPs and for the past couple of years they have been venturing into this dongle market with previous releases such as the S9, S9 Pro, DH80S and plenty more. It has been a while since I tried any Hidizs product apart from the AP80 DAP which I owned long time ago and this is my very first time being offered an oppurtunity by Hidizs to review their product.

The XO features a dual ESS Sabre ES9219C which can be found in their AP80X audio player, protected by under a high-density aluminium alloy chassis. What makes this dongle standout from the rest of its competition is the RGB LEDs along the body of this dongle. As we all know, some majority of audiophiles are also gamers in disguise, perhaps this is a coincidence or Hidizs has been aware of this case since there are the evergreen “X” and “O” symbols of gaming consoles on the main interface. To make things short, the “X” button allows user to cycle through up to 15 lighting effects, while the “O” button is to switch through two digital filters which will be enlighten further into the review.

In other cultural understanding the term XO is also recognized as hugs and kisses. Which can be defined as a lighthearted way of expressing affection, sincerity or deep friendship. The X represents a kiss, while the O represents a hug. Before the scene could get a whole lot spicier, let us get straight into the review and determine whether the Hidizs XO deserves our love.


Packaging and Accessories
The Hidizs XO came in an adorable, palm-sized packaging that slides outward unveiling a similarly sized hard plastic box. The cardboard sleeve itself is printed with an illustration of the dongle itself including its marketing logos at the front while at the back and sides are printed with all of the specifications and extra informations regarding the product itself.

LRM_20230905_172835.jpg
LRM_20230905_173142.jpg


Upon opening the box, its pretty straightforward without much frills you will be directly greeted with the dongle itself resting in a foam tray which can be pulled easily via a ribbon. Other than that, under the foam tray you will notice a small cardboard box where you can find the included generic USB-C with a Hidizs branding on one side to connect to your Android phone, laptop, etc and couple paperworks as well as a product manual. Unfortunately, for our dearly Apple friends Hidizs does not include any Lightning cable or an OTG with the XO. However, Hidizs do sell the LT02 which is a USB-C to Lightning cable on their website for an extra $21.99.


Design and Ergonomics
Built entirely out of high-density aluminium alloy which has undergone through 5-axis CNC process, the XO boasts a modern and elegant design which blends quite easily with the rest of most equipment. Tiny “H” etchings of Hidizs initials on the sides which works as a grill, allows the RGB LED lights shine through the chassis. Hidizs were generous enough to have the XO available in three colour options, Black, Rose Gold and Silver.

LRM_20230908_203805.jpg
LRM_20230908_093752.jpg


Weighing at just 11g and measuring at 55 × 24.5 × 9.35mm, this dongle feels robust yet light and small in profile that is no less than the length of a pinky finger. The edges are angled and smoothen out for better ergonomics and safety.

Top-end of the dongle has a 3.5mm single-ended and a 2.5mm balanced connections, while on the bottom there is a USB-C port which is the norm for all latest dongles in the market. Perhaps, it would have been much positive if the XO is equipped with a 4.4mm Pentaconn as most audiophiles tend to prefer it to the much fragile 2.5mm.

Looking at the main user interface, there are two clicky buttons each distinctly designed as “X” and an illuminating “O” that glows in green colour when powered. Each button allows users to cycle through different features that came in this adorable rectangular box.


Features
Speaking of features, what separates the XO from any other dongle in the market is the existence of RGB lightings on each side, programmable up to 15 effects via the “X” button. Of course, it will draw out slightly more power from the host device and generates more heat, but it can also be switched off when not needed. The light show is unfortunately unskippable, unless by unplugging it or patiently cycle through all the options. Some may see this gamery gimmick as a con, but as long as it is not affect it’s sonic performance and user-friendliness negatively in any possible way.

Furthermore, the illuminated “O” button is also apparently an indicator for file formats and sampling rate such as below;

Color
Format
Red
PCM 352.8/384kHz
Pink
MQA
Blue
PCM 176.4/192kHz
Green
PCM 44.1/48/88.2/96kHz
Yellow
DSD 64/128/256

Clicking the "O" button allows the user to cycle through the filter presets. There are two types of filter which are colour coded on the light ring as Blue in its stock and Red, both filters seemed to mask the treble to some extend. Despite that, the differences between the two filters are almost inaudible and hard to tell unless one is in a quiet ambience. While the differences are not night and day, the Red digital filter seemed to reduces treble a tad more compared to the Blue filter does when critically listened.

Hidizs XO Filter.png


Blue LED: High frequencies reduced by 20-30%, thus low intermediate frequencies will be much prominent
Red LED: High frequencies reduced by 30-40%, thus low intermediate frequencies will be much prominent

I did grab my chance ask Hidizs's representative regarding whether the digital filters can be turned off, since I noticed there was a Green coded light while rotating through the filters. As far as I was informed, there is no option to turn off the digital filter settings, the green coded effect was merely a default setting whereby it will change colour indicating the sampling rate of the current song playing as per shown in the table above.


Specifications
  • Dimensions: (L×W×H) 55*24.5*9.35mm
  • Net weight: 11g
  • DAC SoC: 2* ESS SABRE ES9219C
  • Crystal oscillator: External independent crystal oscillator
  • THD+N: PO (3.5mm): 0.0015%/BAL (2.5mm):0.0005%
  • SNR: PO (3.5mm): 118dB/BAL (2.5mm): 119dB
  • Crosstalk: PO (3.5mm): 76dB/BAL (2.5mm): 118dB
  • PCM: Support up to 32bit/384kHz
  • DSD: Native DSD64/128/256
  • MQA:16X
  • Input option: 1* Type-C
  • Output option: Single-ended (SE) 3.5mm, Balanced 2.5mm
  • Output power: 78mW+78mW@32Ohm, 3.5mm (SE), 195mW+195mW@32Ohm 2.5mm (BAL)
  • Supported systems: Android, Windows, Mac OS, iPad OS, iOS (Lightning cable + OTG sold separately)
  • Tested at: $86.00 USD

Performance that outclasses its size and price tag, the XO is equipped with dual ESS Sabre ES9219C DAC which can be found in Hidizs AP80X, as well as products from other brands such as Shanling UP5 and M3X. Boasting a whopping 78mW+78mW @32Ohms (SE) and 195mW+195mW @32Ohms (BAL) allowing this device to power almost any pair of IEMs and headphones. On lesser efficient headgear and planar-magnetic might be a tad too demanding for the XO could sufficiently provide.

This small dongle is also equipped with a high-precision independent crystal oscillator is adopted to ensure superior phase noise level whilst improving data connection. Even when plugged with a highly sensitive IEMs, the XO proven to be silent at all times without any hissing or humming background noise.

Despite the praises, the XO draws quite a lot of power from its host device, thus making it a less effective when used with a phone, unless it has a large battery. Added with the lights are turned on, the XO will definitely drain battery life a lot faster with greater heat generated. Preferably as well, if Hidizs should have also provided a volume button with wide volume steps or a gain setting on the XO. This is due to the decibel (dB) gain per volume increase were just simply way to high to adjust via the built-in host device volume controller. A small, clumsy mistake on the volume might cause the user to blast their music into their ears, especially for those who listens at lower dB with sensitive IEMs/headphones.


Sound Impression
The Hidizs XO is tuned quite differently when compared to other ESS DACs which I owned in the past, its neutral with a hint of warmth and smoothness in other words it does not leave an irritating harsh tail/transient like a poorly ESS Sabre implementation does. Think of it like listening to an EQ-ed Etymotic SE/SR-series with a 1 dB increase between 60-500Hz. Of course, that being said DAC chips should not produce any sound to some extend, the implementation what matters the most as variables from other components like an op-amp and etc must be taken into account.

Regardless, the XO synergize well with pretty much anything but may not for a brighter gear unless listening music using a stethoscope is actually possible. Soundstaging (ie; width, height and depth) is expansive and airy although it would not quite considered holographic as it almost seems trying to mimick instead. Detail retrieval is also a strong asset for the XO as it being a delta-sigma DAC, subtle nuances and microdetails are presented precisely even on quieter tracks.

Separation between instruments and vocals are outstanding with a dark background behind which gets even darker with the balanced 2.5m output which is expected due to the numbers in the specs sheet. The XO preserves vocal forwardness in mid-centric IEMs exceptionally well, although note weight is a bit lean. Uru’s voice in Furiko (From THE FIRST TAKE) - Uru which usually is intense and velvety warm seems slightly affected, which became slightly lean yet still retaining the fluidity and smoothness in her vocal. Layering was a bit of a shame, some extend of the elements in Mad About You – Hooverphonics and sub-bass rumbles in First Love – Hikaru Utada are a tad mushed together. Dynamic range was cut short, hence bass decay are slightly faster but for those who prefer tighter, faster mid-upper bass might gain from this dongle.


Testing Gears

LRM_20230908_100042.jpg

  • Audio Technica ATH-IM02 (36 Ohms 113dB/mW)
The ATH-IM02 is notoriously well-known of its nature for being a strictly demanding in-ear monitor for source pairing and low output impedance (preferably <1 Ohm) requirement to ensure its dual-BA drivers performing optimally. An impedance mismatch could skew its frequency response from a flat, mid-centric studio reference to a Harman Target with harshly gritty and thin treble in an instance.

The Hidizs XO seems to be a solid, pristine pairing together with the IM02, there was no trace of frequency response shift when plugged into the XO. Despite losing its velvety warm midrange slightly, the XO preserves the IM02 exceptional vocal forwardness and instrument separation impressively. Low-end sounded much chesty, tighter, with faster bass reponse although, the dynamic range and richness is sacrificed by a small amount. Higher frequencies seemingly relishing fair share of vividness, clarity and extension which greatly enhance the airiness which this IEM needed. Definitely my favourite pairing out of all!

IMG_20230909_021328.jpg

  • Dressage DS4+2 (24 Ohms 102dB/mW)
With a low impedance and high sensitivity rating synergy makes the DS4+2 perfect to detect any subtle background hiss or EMI interference within an equipment. However, as far as detailed and thorough testing were done, the XO does not produce any possible background noise, cleanly provide a silent and pristine audio playback quality via the DS4+2 even on maxed volume when no music was played.


Comparison(s)
LRM_20230909_022640.jpg

  • Letshuoer DT02
The DT02 with a single Cirrus Logic CS43131 DAC in its internal provides a much warmer, richer and natural sound signature, that is much well suited for long hours of laid-back listening compared to the XO. Both dongles has almost similar separation with the XO edges in front by a marginal amount but layering wise speaks different. The DT02 could present much complex layering especially within the low-end region with greater dynamics and note weight.

Other than that, the DT02 is beaten quite easily by the XO in terms of soundstaging and clarity, it sounded a lot more intimate and slightly muted at higher frequencies despite having almost similar capability to draw out subtle nuances and microdetails in vast majority of music. The XO is overall a better dongle by a mile which deservedly so, compared to the DT02 if it were compared via technical specs since the XO was much quieter, free from any hiss. Both dongles does get warm from time to time but the XO reaches temperature a lot quicker and higher with the RGB light show turned on, which indirectly causes faster power drain from the host device compared to the DT02.


Conclusion
To wrap this review up, Hidizs has brought up an unique package into the portable audio segment in this small, adorable dongle. Although, it would not be the next big thing at least in my concern compared to other dongle DACs within the similar or lesser price range. Regardless, the XO is still a worthy selection for those who wanted something that is aesthetically unique and quirky that was executed very well.

The XO is build exceptionally well as a whole, I could not find any complaints regarding the overall build and ergonomic aspect of this device. However, it would have been a stellar if the XO comes with a 4.4mm Pentaconn output to increase its relevance among audiophiles as 2.5mm is awarely gotten much obsolete from time to time. Furthermore, a gain setting button or a volume button should be a mandatory for a dongle of this powerful driving power, cannot say the amount of times I have been bamboozled by the sudden volume increase whenever I listen via the HibyMusic App.

Other than that, the XO also was not the most efficient and low-temperature friendly dongle one can get in the market, especially with the RGB effects turn on, it will drain most smartphones quite similarly to some entry-midrange level DAPs. Although, it is not severely piping hot that it could melt plastics, one could at least heat their fingers during the cold weather in no time with the amount of heat the XO could generate. This thus, makes it suitable for desk use instead of purely portable.

In a nutshell, this small powerhouse deserves more exposure for those who are into a dongle that could provide a pristine, accurate sounding and capable of providing wide gear coverage of driving power. Its sonic performances are also one of the main highlight of the XO which definitely benefitting neutral-heads and those who needed a natural reference-like equipment. Perhaps, it could and should have been a better product if only those subtle details such as a gain switch/button or an external volume button could have been added and a better heat dissipation.


For those who are interested to make a purchase for the Hidizs XO, can refer via this link (non-affiliated):
https://www.hidizs.net/products/hidizs-xo-single-ended-balanced-mqa-dongle
Last edited:

n0varay

New Head-Fier
Pros: > Robust aluminium alloy build, mirror-like polish aesthetics
> Tuning flexibility with the detachable nozzles feature
> Adequate amount of accessories
> Excellent separation for under $100, shares similar DNA with the pricier EN1000
> Capable delivering tons of macrodetails
> Engaging bass, with good extension and low-bass depth
> Lush, warm tonal balance in the midrange with good timbre accuracy
> Only requires a measly amount of driving power
Cons: < Finish is prone to debris, dust and scratches
< Loose mid-upper bass response, slight bleeding as well
< Hazy midrange, regardless on which nozzles were equipped
< Upper midrange is a tad shouty and can be intense, though results may be vary
< 5k-8kHz emphasis which causes sibilance and harshness
< Average staging and detail retrieval despite the top-end advantage
< Average isolation even with a proper, secure seal

Full Review – Simgot EA500 – Dazzling Radiance


LRM_20230827_230946 (2).jpg



Disclaimer

  • The reviewed IEM is a purchased personal unit. Thus, all the opinions are original ideas, there is zero influence from any 3rd party or external opinions.
  • No EQ or filter presets were used during the entire review period.
  • Sound evaluation are kept neutral and does not include 3rd party accessories (ie; eartips, cable, reversible mods)


Introduction
The in-ear monitor category has been absolutely blessed in recent years upon plenty releases of IEMs especially within the Chi-Fi market. Within every month, each brand would unveil their latest item in their catalogue to be relished and praised by audiophiles and consumers alike especially within the $100 price bracket. An IEM that I will be reviewing this time is no stranger having caused a storm of hype with endless praises and positive feedbacks which had me travelled back into the memory lane to the hype of the Moondrop Aria and BLON BL03.

Hence, without any further explanation with me this time is the Simgot EA500, priced at only $79. This IEM features a 10mm single-dynamic driver equipped with a Diamond-like Carbon (DLC) diaphragm. Not to forget as well, the center of attraction of this IEM is none other than the detachable tuning nozzle technology. It was known much well in this hobby that this tiny technology was also featured in the Moondrop Kato, Shozy x Neo CP, Letshuoer D13 and etc. Much to my amusement seeing this kind of feature is finally brought into a much budget-friendly market and affordable for the masses.

For those who live internationally and would love to make a purchase could refer to this link through Linsoul's platform (non-affiliated):
https://www.linsoul.com/products/simgot-ea500

For those who live in Malaysia and would love to make a purchase could refer to Red Ape Headphone Store on shopee platform (non-affiliated):
https://shopee.com.my/SIMGOT-EA500-...87&xptdk=e1c591dc-7cc4-4eea-b9d4-9e8cd56d5d87

LRM_20230824_150838 (2).jpg


Unboxing Experience
Unboxing the EA500 overall, was quite a pleasant, simple experience. It came in a rather small, compact packaging printed with a galaxy-themed illustration with plenty of informative specifications of the IEM, including two frequency response diagram on the back. The outer sleeve cardboard box slides out from the left unveiling an inner box which the IEM and accessories are stored.

1693155928442.png


Uniquely to Simgot, a quote by Blaise Pascal were printed onto the inner box, which I personally found really refreshing and unorthodoxly different approach compared to most of its competitors. Upon turning the flap on the inner box, you will be directly greeted by the IEM itself which are snugly fit on a cut-out foam alongside an accessories box and an eartips box where you are provided with a set of eartips of different sizes. Simgot was also kind enough to provide a decent sized IEM case, which are fairly sturdy against pressure and shock.

Not to forget also, the tuning nozzles a key feature of this IEM also included in the box, both nozzles are colour coded with red and black silicones gaskets to ensure airtight seal between the bore and nozzle. Apart from that, what made the two nozzles different from each other is that the black nozzles were filled with tuning foam on each side while the red nozzles came with tuning filters attached behind the metal mesh.


Specifications
  • Driver: 10mm N52 NdFeB Dual-magnet/cavity structure with 4th Gen Diamond-like Carbon (DLC) diaphragm
  • Impedance: 16 Ohm
  • Sensitivity: 123dB/Vrms (@1kHz red nozzle), 124dB/Vrms (@1kHz black nozzle)
  • Frequency Response: 20Hz-20kHz
  • Cable: 1.2m, 4 cores high-purity silver plated OFC cable with 0.78mm 2-pin connectors

Build and Comfort
Moving onto the build of the EA500, safely said it is absolutely class from Simgot to feature an aluminium alloy chassis for the EA500 even at this low price, following the footsteps with their other higher-end models. No corners were cut in terms of the built of this IEM, although its gleaming mirror polished look would result the IEM being prone to be magnets for fingerprints, dusts or debris and an unnecessary hassle for the perfect photoshoot. Its durability against scratches were also questionable but I personally would not dare to ruin such a gorgeous pair of IEM. Regardless, there is little to no complaints regarding the build of the EA500, the detachable nozzle seems to be well-made and really well-secured with the included silicone rubber gaskets to ensure it is airtight at both ends of the bore and nozzle.

Although I had a fairly modest experience in regards of the whole Simgot line-up, having only tested its higher model which was the EN1000. Despite, this is not a direct comparison to the EN1000 but the humble EA500 has an ergonomically much comfier fit and design compared to the EN1000, I did still have to take them off though occasionally after a while due to its size and slightly heavier nature which causes my ears to sore especially around the cochlea region. Isolation were also wasn’t a key prowess of the EA500, it filters out noise fairly decent. Based on my personal experience I could hear much of the things going on within my surroundings, this of course depends on how secure one could fit the large chassis of this IEM

The included 4 core silver-plated OFC cable were also made out of fairly decent quality cable, which is not a surprise considering its price point. It has a very minimal amount of microphonic especially when wearing the IEM while on-the-go, the thick PVC coating on the outer layer provides a rubbery, fairly supple feeling and tangle-free although still I would consider this cable would be in the slightly firmer side.


Test Equipment
  • Apple Music/Spotify + Local files via HiBy Music > Letshuoer DT02 dongle DAC/AMP (1 Vrms@32 Ohms (SE) and 2 Vrms@300 Ohms (Bal).
  • Apple Music/Spotify (100%) + Local files via HiBy Music (32/32) > SMSL Sanskrit MKII > Aune X7s
  • Laptop
  • Smartphone

Power Requirements
Driving the EA500 requires a measly amount of power out of your dongles and portable amplifiers. Hence, a desktop level amplification is definitely unnecessary, a phone would run this IEM adequately. Since, this IEM is rated at only 123dB/Vrms with the red nozzle equipped and a dB higher when equipped with the black nozzle. That being said, the higher sensitivity does not seem to make the EA500 prone to emit any sort of background noises nor hisses when plugged across various sources.

Based on personal experience, plugging the EA500 into the Letshuoer DT02 dongle which is rated at 1 Vrms@32 Ohms (SE) and utilizing the in-app volume of the HibyMusic as a reference. The EA500 only required me to increase the volume up to 2-4/32 for my comfortable casual and critical listening.


Initial Impression
Upon listening it for the first time, the first thing that came to mind was the separation that the EA500 could produce for a single-dynamic. It sounded identically similar to its higher-end model which I praised in my previous reviews of the Simgot EN1000. To pull it off in a similar manner but inside a much lower-end segment of the market is honestly quite impressive by any means, perhaps this is something that specifically Simgot are really good at.

Apart from that, the overall sound signature that this IEM possesses a Harman Target set of tuning that pretty much everyone is familiar with, having this sort of tuning will always leads to a recessed midrange especially for vocals. Higher frequencies were quite sizzly or almost tizzy at times which is not necessarily a negative point but what matters more is that there is an accentuated amount of sibilance which might be an early red flag for some demograph.

Despite that being said, the detachable tuning nozzles that the EA500 came with allowing flexibility for users to switch between a milder, leaner bass-shelf with greater treble extension with the black nozzle or a much warmer, prominent Harman signature and balanced sound across the frequency spectrum with the included red nozzle. The rest of the sound evaluation below will be carried using the black nozzles since that is the stock tuning and accustomed by Simgot for the EA500.


Low Frequency (Bass)
Dwelling straight into the lowest part of the spectrum, the 10mm DLC dynamic driver presents low-end quite lean, impactful and fast. Starting from the sub-bass, rumbles were light yet still capable of rendering modest amount of texture and detail. For example, in the track Hollow (16-Bit Remix) - Björk the EA500 passes this track quite well capable of rendering deep sub-bass rumble in the first 30 seconds into the track. The waving rumbles were nicely textured with decent clarity as per macrodetails goes, that does unfortunately turned a tad dull upon using the red nozzles. Although, it was not something that is mind blowing, its still commendable for the under $100 market.

The mid to upper bass region of the EA500 were engaging, well-extended and enjoyable with its impactful and fast bass response. Each bass slam resembles a chesty punch, with decent note weight and finished with a slow, extended decay. Which then, complemented by the fast, hard response giving it a pleasureable experience despite being nowhere near what it would call a tight visceral bass. Tracks such as Hunter – Björk testing the capability of the EA500 to its utmost. The IEM presented the track as per expected, each bass transients were fast and the EA500 could catch up quite nicely, although the resonance between each bass impact were quite loose and the slow decay which eventually cause some melding between each transient.

Middle Frequency (Mid)
As we continue, as far as mid frequency goes the EA500 has a fairly flat and a tad recessed midrange with a slightly warm tonal balance within 100Hz-500Hz by a couple decibels. This gives it a noticeable lushness and thickness especially genres that has a lot of vocal and acoustical elements. For instance, in the track A Poem Titled You – Taeyeon, the slight additional emphasis allowed the piano and Taeyeon’s voice to be slightly warmer and thicker than neutral, reverberations were also quite emphasized hence each key from the piano has a lingering sounds of reverb.

Although, the emphasis does brought some positives in some respect which I personally think the EA500 does benefit from it. This also came with a cost, whereby the added upper-bass to midrange causes the mids sounded slightly hazy and muddy. Both nozzles does not seem to be able to reduce this effect as the red nozzle only seemed to make it a tad less muddy and controlled yet the haziness still persist. Moreover, the upper midrange region could get a tad shouty and intense occasionally, even though it was not severe but it is certainly something that users would notice.

High Frequency (Treble)
Treble was also an area that is the main spotlight of the EA500, suitedly perfect with its design and mirror-like shine aesthetics. This IEM has an emphasized treble region and seemed to be quite spiky as well at certain regions especially within the upper-highs, which could be smoothen out to some extend by equipping the red nozzles that meant to provide a much warmer, laid-back tuning.

That said, the EA500 possesses a treble that is modestly bright, crisp, quite airy and sparkly as well. Timbre of cymbals (i.e., china/ride/crash cymbals) sounded quite realistic and distinguishable with an added crisp at each tail, while hi-hats in the other hand could occasionally sounded a tad too tizzy at times. Other than its brightness to note here, there were also sibilance to be found probably due to a spike around 5k-8kHz, which causes most elements that reaches up to that frequency to sound sharp and coarse. This of course, easily been heard through vocals such as in the track Ignorance (Acoustical) – Paramore, where the EA500 seems too accentuate the sibilance from Hayley William’s voice. Even with the warmer, laid-back sounding red nozzles equipped, the sibilance does still persists although it is toned down slightly flatter to a much tolerable degree. Plus, airiness were also affected when equipping the red nozzle hence, it might sounded slightly closed, with darker sound due to the slight treble roll-off.


Technicality
Moving onto the technicalities for the EA500, the soundstaging of this IEM was quite average and intimate, although it would be nowhere to be called “holographic”. There was not a lot of width within the staging but depth wise from front to back was decent and roomy, as well as for its staging height. Its spatial imaging is another story. Imaging wise, the EA500 could pinpoint elements quite sharp, solid for something that is under the $100 market. For instance, in Bubbles – Yosi Horikawa whereby in one part into the track, there is a rolling effect on one of the ball on the far left moving forward which the EA500 could follow the movement of the ball accurately.

Next, apart from the pinpointly accurate imaging, the detail retrieval that this IEM possseses were also one of the key strength. Despite it would not render subtle nuances and microdetails delicately, this IEM is still capable to dish out tons of macrodetails and high-level textures out of your music, which does unsurprisingly dulls out when equipping the red nozzle. Separation and layering was also seems to be well-executed in separating vocals from other elements similar to its bigger brother the EN1000. But avoid all of such praises fool you, occasionally while the vocals between passages were separated, other instruments/precussions poorly tend to meld and layered onto each other.

Last but not least, the dynamic range for the EA500 was average at best. Utilizing the Ultimate Headphone Test - ABYSS Headphone dynamic range test as a reference. In which explained in short, a sample sound of a drum and a bell are played simultaneously as much as 7 counts, but only the sound of the bells will become quieter. Hence, from a scale of 7 counts, the EA500 was able to produce an audible 5 out of 7 counts.


Conclusion
For my final verdict, the Simgot EA500 is a solid option into your consideration list for IEMs under the $100 mark. Despite the slight shortcomings, this IEM is definitely worth a consider for audiophiles that care about midrange quality that shares the similar DNA in its bigger higher-end EN1000, with good separation and the unique naturalness that audiophiles crave from a single-dynamic driver. Simgot has yet again produced a high-quality product and being consistent driving towards excellence in terms of the product that they have released in recent times, which I hope this positive trend will continue.

Achieving a snug seal and proper fit is the utmost importance to get out of the most from this IEM which is also my main complaint on its bigger sibling which was the EN1000. A slight leak on the seal will affect the sound quality you are getting from the EA500. Of course with a little investment on better eartips such as Azla Xelastec would provide excellent seal required whlist further enhance the midrange and allowing tighter, cleaner bass response this competent performer in the $100 market.



Additional Test Tracks
Anesthetize – Porcupine Tree DSD256

First Love - Hikaru Utada 44.1kHz

Masquerade - Lindsey Stirling 44.1kHz

Motherboard - Daft Punk DSD256

添迷不悔 (Zhi Mi Bu Hui) - Faye Wong DSD256

Keroncong Hybrid For Bidadari - Pot Amir 44.1kHz

Would? – Alice in Chains 44.1kHz

Veronica – Red Hot Chilli Pepper 192kHz

Furiko – Uru 44.1kHz
Last edited:

n0varay

New Head-Fier
Pros: > Highly affordable
> Lightweight aluminium alloy build
> Adequate amount of accessories
> Quality, approachable warm and laid-back tuning
> Suitable for those who prioritize sub-bass depth
Cons: < Demands quite a bit of power, due to low sensitivity rating
< Annoying microphonic cable
< Technically mediocre, apart for its fairly wide dynamic range
< Sounds quite muddy, suffers from bleeding as well
< Harsh treble and narrow soundstage if its not driven properly
< Non detachable cable
< Darkish treble, lacking in terms of airiness

Tangzu Princess Chang Le – A Baroque Earpiece and A Comforter​


LRM_20230808_230406.jpg


Disclaimer
  • This unit has been fully sponsored by Tangzu who has included Tangzu Tang Sancai eartips in exchange for this review.
  • All the opinions in this review are original ideas, without any influence or any flattery words from any party nor the sponsor.
  • No EQ or filter presets were used during the entire review period.

To purchase Tangzu Princess Chang Le or the Tang Sancai eartips, can head directly to this attached link (non-affiliated);
https://tangzu.net/?fbclid=IwAR1RBAO-SvYmZecqMrarYP1dBQ3SJogRcKb3V32vA5H7BVdUPEFtKwclJ0s

Introduction
Tangzu is a brand that is no stranger to audio enthusiasts, especially within the Chi-Fi market. They are now one of the names that dominate the budget segment market with IEMs such as Tangzu Shimin Li and the Wan'er which is said to be one of the IEMs that became a "game-changer", offering impressive tuning quality for an IEM that hardly cost anything.

Thus, in this review is the Tangzu Princess Chang Le, an another addition to the Tangzu IEM series named after the names of the historical Chinese Tang dynasty. This IEM adopts a bullet-style design, also marketed as a semi-open-back pair, which is fully decorated with CNC engravings and aesthetic value of traditional Chinese cultural motifs. It is indeed one of the IEMs that can be said to be aesthetically unique compared to other IEMs on the market in its price range. Included also in this review is the Tangzu Tang Sancai eartips, a brand new pair of eartips specially developed by Tangzu which will definitely be talked about in this review as well.

Tangzu Chang Le can be found on the online market and Tangzu official website or on online shopping platforms for a measly $15, while the Tang Sancai eartips in the other hand are sold for $12 per box. Without further delay, let's move on to the review!


LRM_20230816_213800.jpg


Unboxing Experience
The Tangzu Princess Chang Le came in a small box, with in front of the box is a fictional illustration of Princess Chang Le. As you might have notice this approach from Tangzu, is distinguishably different and fresh compared to anime illustrations which are one of the most mainstream medium for most Chi-Fi brands to market their IEMs. On the back of this Chang Le box, there are all the specifications and basic information about this IEM that is neatly organized and easy to read.

Moreover, as soon as you open the Tangzu Chang Le box, you will be presented with the IEM itself which is neatly packed on a piece of foam and on the flip side of the cover, you will find a pack of eartips provided by Tangzu. The eartips consist of two types and three different sizes. Namely, the clear white ones are narrow bore, while the colored ones are wide bore. Although, this IEM is marketed in the budget segment, in terms of accessories it is quite adequate even for some who may think that adding some sort of a drawstring bag will perhaps further complete this package.


Specifications
  • Driver: 6mm dynamic driver
  • Impedance: 16 Ohms
  • Sensitivity: 95.5 dB + 1dB (1kHz)
  • Frequency Response: 20Hz-20kHz
  • Cable: 1.2mm (in-line mic) 4N OFC silver-plated wire with 3.5mm plug


Build and Comfort
For construction and comfort, this Tangzu Chang Le is made entirely of aluminum alloy iron which is very light and carefully carved using CNC machining process to produce accurate and charming carving art. The entire aesthetic value of this IEM is guided by the traditional culture of the Chinese community which further highlights the uniqueness of its appearance. However, given the quality there are a few areas that feel a little rough when held with a finger and there is some chipping in the color along the cable entry hole.

The practicality of using this Chang Le is quite easy because of its shape that adapts the bullet-shaped IEM, light and small enough to be carried anywhere. There are no issues with comfort where, I was able to use this IEM for hours without feeling tired or bothered by the design. The cable with in-line microphone/control that is permanently attached to this IEM may not be a popular view. Especially, when you consider that there are many other IEMs offering the detachable type at roughly the same price. In addition, the cable attached to this Chang Le was absurdly microphonic, so any immediate friction or movement will easily disturb your listening experience.


Test Equipment
  • Apple Music/Spotify + Local files via HiBy Music > Letshuoer DT02 dongle DAC/AMP (1 Vrms@32 Ohms (SE) and 2 Vrms@300 Ohms (Bal).
  • Apple Music/Spotify (100%) + Local files via HiBy Music (32/32) > SMSL Sanskrit MKII > Aune X7s
  • Laptop
  • Smartphone

Power Requirements
Next, when it comes to the topic of power requirement. One of the things that attracts attention the most was the sensitivity rating of this IEM which is measured at 95.5 dB which is rather low compared to anything else in its class.

In short, this Tangzu Chang Le does not require you to buy an endgame dongle nor a nuclear powerhouse like the iFi Diablo to ensure the best performance out of this IEM. Truthfully, a laptop or smartphone that has a solid and fairly powerful built-in amplifier could directly power this IEM just fine. At its underpowered state, the Tangzu Chang Le could sound a little overwhelming in the low frequencies, harsh or coarse in high frequencies and the soundstaging also sounded really narrow. As a result, I would not say this is a disappointment but its certainly one of the things one should consider before purchasing this IEM.

Based on my personal experience with Tangzu Chang Le, the Letshuoer DT02 dongle which has an output power of 1 Vrms @32 Ohm (SE) is sufficient enough to supply power for this IEM. For example, by using HiBy Music App's in-app volume as a reference. I only needed to increase the volume by 7-10/32, to get a volume that is comfortable for me to listen. On a much more powerful amplifier such as the Aune X7s, which has a power of 1000mW@32 Ohm (SE) in low-gain setting. As far as testing goes, I’m only required to increase the pot volume past 10 o’clock to acquire my comfortable volume level.

LRM_20230808_224952.jpg


Initial Impressions
During the initial listening session, the overall sound signature of this IEM is undoubtly a resembles the Harman Curve sound profile. However, with a little extra increase on the bass-shelf compared to its higher frequencies, and less emphasis within the higher treble region which indirectly made it a little darker, less airy sounding pair.

Middle frequencies were less emphasized than the low and higher frequencies, therefore it sounds a bit recessed. Even so, it still sounds quite clear and fairly clean without any problems.

Overall, this Tangzu Chang Le has an exciting and laid-back sound that is suitable for listening and enjoying every bit of your music casually. There are two different types of eartips supplied in the box which also provides the flexibility to tweak the sound of this IEM according to your preferred taste, which we will cover further along with the included Tangzu Tang Sancai.


Low Frequency
It can be said, low frequency is one of the key features to consider this IEM, in addition to its charming look and shape. The Tangzu Chang Le has an energetic, warm, tight with a rich bass quantity that is certainly doesn't match its diminutive appearance. It is suitable for those who want more bass than the Harman neutral curve. In fact, for those bassheads out there, they might probably also like the quantity that was being presented in this cute package.

In terms of sub-bass, rumbles and vibration effects are presented significantly although this was only limited to macrodetails only. For example, in the track Hollow (16 Bit Remix) – Björk. The sub-bass rumble within the first 30 seconds into the track was very well replicated. Meanwhile, the sub-bass vibration which is a micro detail in this track were weak and poorly defined.

Moving on to mid-bass and upper-bass, Tangzu Chang Le presented it very well, unexpectedly energetic and exciting for a 6mm micro dynamic driver. Every bass punch were solid, combined with a deep bass extension with a clearly emphasized weight that sometimes, will sound a tad boomy. Mid to upper-bass slam resembled much to a tight "thud" sound compared to a boom or chesty bass slam with fairly decent speed giving the bass on this Tangzu Chang Le a vibrant and energetic bass presentation. However, that’s said this IEM has a significant bass bleed and muddiness up to the lower-midrange, causing tracks like The Warmth - Incubus, bassline rendition and kick drum sound in this track was blurry and meld with each other which results to a rather overwhelmingly bassy and muddy experience.

Middle Frequency
Tangzu Chang Le exhibits a slightly muddy midrange, the effect of bleeding in the upper-bass to lower-mids area. Nevertheless, this IEM still sounds musical with a number of colourations that provide a warm tonality and a relaxed character. Every note that is played, for example the sounds of instruments, percussions and vocal tones seem heavier and richer which benefitted in both male and female vocals.

For example, in the track Whiskey Lullaby (ft. Allison Krauss) - Brad Paisly. Raspy and deep vocal grains that can be heard in Brad Paisley's voice was emphasized and the guitar passages in the background also sound fuller and softer. Also, in the track Mediterranean Sundance – Al Di Meola. Tangzu Chang Le was able to provide a fairly modest timbre quality for an affordable set. The sound of the guitar notes are separated well enough although, sometimes the tone of the two guitars are almost impossible to tell apart, fine details in the track such as reverb and tapping on the body and strings of the guitar were also less defined in this pair.

For vocal performance, this IEM has a fairly relaxed presentation that is well separated from the various elements in songs with the vocals that are slightly recessed, synonymous with the Harman Curve tuning. Apart from that, there's not whole a lot of macrodetails let alone microdetails that Chang Le could display and in terms of articulation of the lyrics are still fairly clear and audible although occasionally in some songs it can sound slightly blurry and muddy that might have been caused by the bass bleed. For instance, in the track A Poem Titled You Taeyeon, where Taeyeon's voice on some certain parts can be quite intense, slightly shouty and muddy as well.

High Frequency
As for the treble part, Tangzu presents you with an IEM that is able to present a relaxed and fairly crisp treble in this small package. For some audiences, it may sound a little dark, lacking in air and veiled, especially past 10kHz area which can be heard quite obviously less emphasised. In addition, the treble on this Chang Le in terms of timbre is fairly artificial and natural. For example, in the track Ignorance – Paramore, the sound of the tambourine being hit in the background of the track sounds oddly similar to twigs being placed in a plastic container and then shaken forcefully.

Although, this Chang Le was a semi open-back IEM, it sounds a little narrow and closed or in other word it has a lacking sense of airiness due to the less emphasised treble extension. Furthermore, even though this IEM is driven with enough power, on some occasion it can sound a bit rough and sharp which can cause ear fatigue for prolounged listening. This depends on the genre construction of your playlist, psychoacoustic tolerance and the types of eartips being used.


Technicality
From a technical standpoint, there are not many attributes that could left us feeling admired with the Tangzu Chang Le. Nevertheless, it is highly understandable because of the price category and Tangzu’s main goal and hopes with the Chang Le.

Hence, now turning your attention directly to the soundstaging capability of this IEM. Tangzu Chang Le has a relatively narrow sounstage on both horizontally and vertically despite being a semi open-back design. This results to a limited and intimate soundstage that is only within inside the head. Its ability to present exhibit macrodetails and microdetails in track was also quite poor, its quite blurry and could only be compared with other IEMs within its price range.

In addition, spatial imaging and layering abilities are also another addition to the cons list of this IEM. It can identify movement limited within a flat two-dimentional plane only, from left to right quite accurately but not as effectively if it is for something that are much complex such as binaural recording. For example, the track War - Jammie Haddad where the elements in this recording such as drum beats, gongs, cymbals and etc were being hit from various directions and different distances.

Even so, this IEM has a fairly good sound separation, it can isolate a limited number of elements and will sound quite congested and narrow in busier tracks. Finally, in terms of dynamic range. This Tangzu Chang Le honestly exceeded my expectations for a budget category IEM. For example, in the Ultimate Headphone Test sound sample - ABYSS Headphone. Where, the sound of drums and bells are played simultaneously as many as 7 times, but only the sound of the bells becomes quieter. From a scale of 7, Tangzu Chang Le was able to produce 5 out of 7 sounds clearly. Surprisingly on par with something that was 10 times its price, which I reviewed quite recently.


Tangzu Tang Sancai Advanced Eartips, are they any good?

As I promised to comment a little about the choices of eartips that you can use to get a little more performance from your Tangzu Chang Le. In simpler word, if you prefer a much balanced sound across the spectrum, softer low frequency punch without sacrificing the lush and warm tonality, with better separation in the midrange, tamer smoother treble and greater soundstage witdh. The Tang Sancai might worth to be in your consideration for an additional $12 for a pack of these eartips, they're apparently very comfortable, with fairly grippy texture and soft as well.

In addition, for the stock eartips which came along inside the box. I personally found the coloured core eartips were also an alternative to the Tang Sancai. However, these eartips creates a leaner mid-upper bass punch to the Chang Le. Whilst the bass slam results into a much softer/polite impact, with thinner mids but with the same treble and soundstage upgrade as you have with the Tang Sancai. Meanwhile, the clear stock eartips focuses more on bass quantity due to their narrower bore. As a result, the IEM will sound a lot bassier, with thicker note and weight but slight more recessed mids with sharper and sibilant treble.

Other eartips such as TRI Clarion is also a good pairing for those who prefer a less bassier approach, much forward vocal, indirectly shifting the sharpness slightly away to a much tolerable spectrum and greater enhancing the treble extension on the Tangzu Chang Le which to me felt it really needed.


Conclusion
To close the curtain on the review this time, I would like to present many thanks and appreciations to Tangzu for their willingness to fully sponsor this Princess Chang Le along with Tang Sancai eartips.

Tangzu has provided and presented us an IEM that offers good tuning quality at a price that is very affordable for everyone. Not to be forgotten, for a roughly $15, what you get is an IEM that is built fully out of lightweight aluminium alloy, along with the meticulous CNC engraving process of unique aesthetic value, highlighting this IEM more than its other rival.

Although, there are some downsides such as a fixed cable, which if you consider it clearly that there are other plenty options within the price range that’s equipped with a detachable cable. Build quality that could need slightly more improvisations and etc. It is still an IEM worth buying if you prefer a more relaxed, warm sound signature with more character in the low frequency region. So with that, that will wrap up my review this time, hope this review helps and will see you in the next review!


Additional Test Tracks
Anesthetize – Porcupine Tree DSD256

Hunter – Björk 44.1kHz

First Love - Hikaru Utada 44.1kHz

执迷不悔 (Zhi Mi Bu Hui) - Faye Wong DSD256

Would? – Alice in Chains 44.1kHz

Timbres – Yosi Horikawa 44.1kHz

Just No Other Way (To Love Me) – CoCo Lee 48kHz
Last edited:

n0varay

New Head-Fier
Simgot EN1000
Pros: > Mild Harman Curve target with minimal emphasis on treble region.
> Interchangeable plugs enable versatile range of tuning.
> Musical presentation across the board yet capable to still deliver tons of detail.
> Stunning build quality and engraved artwork.
> More than necessary essential accessories provided.
Cons: > Mediocre fit and isolation.
> Sub-bass roll-off and slightly sluggish mid-upper bass.
> Treble pike around 5-6kHz which causes sharpness.
> Questionable tuning plug durability in the long run.

Simgot "King Wonder” EN1000 – Gaze Upon A Flawed Sovereignty


LRM_20230602_023746.jpg

Disclaimer​

  • This is a my own personal unit and all opinions are original ideas, hence there’s no influences, external opinions and involvements from any 3rd-party.
  • No EQ or filter presets are used throughout the whole review.
  • Since this model has 3 tuning plug options, only the blue indicated plug (Balanced) will be used as a main reference throughout the whole review.



Introduction
Simgot is one of Chinese Hi-Fi (Chi-Fi) brands that has generated rapid popularity and followers in recent times with some of their models that are popular among newcomers who are just getting into this rabbit hole and senior Chi-Fi enthusiasts alike, such as the EW100P, EW200 and EA500 that offers supreme audio quality and features brilliant premium construction at an affordable price.

Established in 2015, Simgot as per quoted from their website which also means "Simple and Elegant", originally it was not a well-known brand like it is now especially in Asia market. Starting from their first model EN700, followed by the later 700 Bass and 700 Pro models which has received numerous favorable response worldwide. Until then, the release of the EM2 Roltion which really became a "hype" in the last few years and has landed a brand new landmark for Simgot to continue strengthen it’s name into the Chi-Fi market.

Therefore, with me this time is the EN1000 model or also known by its nickname “King Wonder”, which supposed to be the successor to their first flagship EN700 Pro. This IEM, priced around $189 is equipped with a 10mm dynamic driver with a DLC diaphragm coated with a layer of beryllium plating. In addition, this IEM also comes with a package of 3 types of tuning plugs that can be replaced according to the listener's suitability, granted that being said the main highlight in this review apart from its sound. With all the pleasantries are done, let's continue with the review of the Simgot King Wonder EN1000.


LRM_20230531_231551.jpg
LRM_20230531_231617.jpg

LRM_20230602_011345.jpg


Unboxing Experience
For starters, the EN1000 came in an all black box, decorated with rose gold lettering written all over the box. In front of it, is a realistic illustration of the IEM itself, while on the side and back of the box lies all the information about the technology that has been implemented into this IEM including the general specification info. In addition, there’s also a frequency response graph of the EN1000 alongside the effects of each tuning plugs towards the frequency response of the IEM that is interchangeable easily via plug-&-play.

Truly luxurious, was my initial impression upon opening the box of this IEM for the very first time. In terms of presentation and arrangement of all accessories including the IEM itself, were neat and tidy indirectly increases the value of this IEM, it really looks astoundingly amazing for an IEM that costs well under $200.

Upon unboxing the box, you are immediately greeted by the IEM itself, an appreciation card from Simgot which included inside was also a warranty extension card. In addition, there is also an IEM case made of synthetic leather, several cards showing wearing guides for the IEM, an illustrated tutorial on how to change the tuning plugs, a user manual and last but not least a warranty card. Simgot was very generous to provide two set of eartips of different sizes, an 8-core SPC cable that is made out of high quality, non-microphonic material and not to forget the 3 types of tuning plugs that we will discuss later below.


Specifications
  • Driver: 10mm 5th Gen Dual-cavity, DLC & Beryllium-plated Diaphragm Dynamic Driver
  • Impedance: 32 Ohms ± 15% (@1kHz/N-type MIRROR module)
  • Sensitivity: 108 dB/SPL
  • Frequency Response: 20Hz-40kHz
  • Cable: 8 core 5N Silver-plated OFC, 0.78mm 2-pin connector

Build and Comfort
Captivating, one word that summed up to describe the looks of the EN1000. This IEM is not just meant to be worn, but could may as well fooled somebody and mistaken as a piece of jewellery due to their truly stunning build quality. Combined with delicate and meticulous engraved artworks that is sure to catch the eye of plenty crowd. The basic building material for this EN1000 is aluminum alloy metal and stainless steel that has undergone a 5-axis CNC machining process and Metal Injection Molding (MIM) which also be the reason the amount of heft this IEM has, which may affect the comfort during use.

Meanwhile, switching the view towards the interchangeable tuning plug technology which is one of the main highlight on the EN1000. To be completely honest, the whole unorthodox system of using a detachable plug that Simgot tried to implement inside the EN1000 was unconvincing in terms of durability for the long run. As far as it concerns me, the connection is quite loose even though it is installed tightly, not to mention the thin pins that might bend during installation/detaching process. Additionally, the plastic grooves on both sides of the plug will probably wear out, depending on how often you swap between the plugs. Where it will affect the integrity of sound quality that’s produced, even though there is an external barrel casing that acts as a tightening mechanism.

Moving into the next point, in terms of overall wearing comfort it was a rather an unpleasant experience. This is due to ergonomics, because this IEM has a short nozzle with a rather odd oval design. This makes it difficult to get a tight and secure fitting. Indirectly, this left a large impact on the isolation of the EN1000, it is difficult to get optimal tightness even with various types of eartips including the ones that have been provided. Other factors such as the two venting holes on the front and next to the nozzle of each side of this IEM also played a lesser key role to prevent external noise that can still be clearly heard.


Test Equipment
  • Apple Music/Spotify + Local files via HiBy Music > Letshuoer DT02 dongle DAC/AMP (1 Vrms@32 Ohms (SE) and 2 Vrms@300 Ohms (Bal).
  • Laptops
  • Smart phone

Power Requirements
As far as driveability is concerned of the EN1000, it is an IEM that is both efficient and easy to drive via a low-powered dongle, or you can plug it directly to a smartphone and it’ll run just fine. For example, by using the Letshuoer DT02 dongle which has a power of 1 Vrms @32 Ohms (SE) as my point of reference, this IEM can be powered optimally and be able reach comfortable volume easily with still a lot of headroom in hand to increase the volume.

Using the in-app volume through HiBy Music as a point of reference, I only needed to increase the volume by 4 up to 6/32 to reach my personal comfortable volume for my most listening. In relation to that as well, the EN1000 stays dead silent and does not easily affected or to pick up any humming and hissing/white noises across various equipments that I have tried.


Initial Impression
For starters, the sound signature produced by the EN1000 is synonymous to a mild Harman with a moderate bass-shelf height and a little emphasis on the high frequencies/treble, in simple words the EN1000 has a sound signature focused on being a balanced-bright pair of IEM. Even so, the EN1000 is an IEM that could not be simply categorized as bright, cold or analytical, as the treble timbre of this IEM it is more sort of a cool tone with a balanced amount of low frequencies to provides a musical, slightly mellow and comfortable listening experience even for longer periods of time.

Low Frequency
Starting right away from the lowest sub-bass frequency, the EN1000 has a roll-off that causes this IEM to produce a rather lacking sub-bass performance especially with rumbles and vibrations, although that seemed to be the case this IEM was able to present a detailed texture with very good overall definition. For example in the track, Hollow (16-bit Remix) – Björk the EN1000 found it difficult to replicate the deep rumbles and vibrations of sub-bass as low as 20Hz in the first 30 seconds in the beginning of this track although in terms of dynamics, the 10mm dynamic driver (DD) on this EN1000 did its job very well.

Entering into the mid and upper bass region of the EN1000, this IEM presents a tight, energetic and dynamic bass. Every bass hit were tight, slightly bouncy, and deep with a adequate amount of weight. However, the impact of the bass hit on this IEM was more focused on a politer side and a bit less controlled, therefore the speed produced by the DD in this EN1000 were to be found slightly weak. For example, in Hunter – Björk where at the beginning of the song listeners were presented with rapid bass punch followed by reverberation in between each and sub-bass rumble in the background. The EN1000 presents the bass punch impactfully but with a slightly weaker anticipation and speed.

Mid Frequency
Next, moving into the midrange which the EN1000 presents a soft midrange presentation clean from any harshness or mud, as the IEM also presented detailed and euphonic. There is a slight tonal coloration that can be heard, thus causing the midrange including male and female vocals to sound a tad warmer than neutral. For example, in the track Whiskey Lullaby (ft. Alison Krauss) – Brad Paisley and A Poem Titled You – Taeyeon where the voices of the singers in both tracks have a slightly added tonal warmth than neutral, meanwhile presentation distance is slightly forward depending on the type of plug tuning that will be talked about later.

The quality of the timbre is also one of the strengths of the EN1000 which gives the ability to easily distinguish the types of vocals/instruments/percussions. The track Down In A Hole (MTV Unplugged) – Alice in Chains was used for this purpose. The tone of Jerry Cantrell and Layne Staley on a part of the song. Where they sing several fillers with the same pitch and this IEM quite easily distinguishes their voices, Layne Staley’s iconic grundge voice was presented detailed with average texture. The harmony between all of the elements and acoustic guitar passages in the background sounded a little soft, smooth and lush due to the slightly warm tonality that this IEM posseses.

High Frequency
Finally, for the treble response it can be said that the EN1000 skewed slightly leaning brighter treble. However, although that’s being said it is more of a cool treble rather than cold, as per mentioned in initial impression. For example, in an IEM that really emphasizes high frequency tend to have a much colder, dry treble. As we continue, the EN1000 presents listener with a wide treble extension providing an airy ambience, detailed, exciting and clear clarity.

However, there was a minimal emphasis on the area around 5-6kHz could be heard right away, which causes the EN1000 to have a slightly sharp and edgy treble. For example, in the track Ignorance (Acoustic) – Paramore, Hayley Williams’s pronunciation of the words "s, sh, t, th" have an accentuated sibilance that is more inclined towards sharp than rough, sound reproduction of tambourine in the background were also accentuated yet light, a tad sharp and edgy.

As for the synergy of eartips, options like Azla Xelastec are among my favorites to pair with this IEM. These eartips are very helpful to get a perfect seal with the EN1000, allowing a wider range and deeper sub-bass extension. In addition, these eartips help to provide a darker background to the midrange of this IEM while providing fluidity and a more natural, organic tone to vocals, stringed instruments such as violin, double-bass, acoustic guitar etc.

Memory foams such as the Acoustune AT02 and Hill Audio Ergo Pro also work very well to provide a much open midrange with warmer tonality but slightly softer although its not as warm as with the Xelastec. Treble also sounds more natural, free of sibilance and helps in terms of airiness. Soundstaging became a bit wider with better element separation but detail retrieval was a tad less nuanced.


Technical Ability
From a technical point of view, the EN1000 is capable of presenting wide soundstaging horizontally and vertically with decent spatial, the movement of elements is displayed clearly but not the most pinpoint accurate. In addition, this IEM also has the ability to provide excellent detail retrieval even when the track is played at low volume. Microdetails and subtle nuances are able to be presented by the EN1000, for example the sound of the plane in the beginning of the song Hotel California (1976) – Eagles which is clearly heard from right to left.

The separation aspect of the EN1000 was also a key strength of this IEM, it can separate various elements in a track well. For example, in the track Mad About You (Live at Koningin Elisabethzaal 2012) – Hooverphonics, the EN1000 were able to give an illusion with every element in this track is neatly arranged, well separated without causing any congestion or melding. Although, in terms of layering the EN1000 could only able to perform quite decently.

Finally, in terms of dynamic range, the EN1000 presents an average dynamic range. By using the Ultimate Headphone Test - ABYSS Headphone dynamic range sample as a reference. Where the sound of drums and bells are played simultaneously as many as 7 times, but only the sound of the bells changes and becomes quieter. Out of a scale of 7, the EN1000 was able to produce a decent 5 out of 7 count clearly.


LRM_20230626_030407.jpg

Interchangeable Tuning Plugs – Is It Just a Gimmick or a Miracle?​

"Infinite tuning possibilities", quoted from Simgot’s appreciation card which explains the function of the tuning plugs, one of the main features of this flagship model. Long story short, these plugs turned out to actually work according to its promise that provides 3 types of distinct change of sound. Allows you to change some part of the frequency range of this IEM according to your taste likewise with Equalization (EQ). However, it is limited for only the selected part of the spectrum band only which starts from 2kHz on aggregate and all the way above.

  • Black Plug (N3A000)
Its the original configuration when you receive the EN1000. In terms of sound difference, this plug provides the most forward midrange presentation, treble clarity and extension. But this effect indirectly causes the midrange of this IEM to be thin and quite shouty. This plug also makes the treble sounds marginally brighter and dry yet it presents the most clarity out of all. In consequence to it, other effects such as sibilance and treble sharpness are also a lot noticeable when using this plug. Low frequencies are also affected where they sound lighter, tighter and bass impact also skewed more towards being soft compared to the prior polite. Therefore, it is not suitable if you are sensitive to treble, or those who care about treble quality.

  • Blue Plug (C3A035)
In simple words, this is the plug labeled by Simgot as "Balanced" among the three tuning plugs which is also the original EN1000 tuning. To summarize, even if you change the stock cable to an aftermarket cable, the sound signature of this IEM will by default change based on the graph with this plug. This blue plug also provides change in sound predominantly within the treble region, offering an airy and wide treble extension similar to the black plug, only slightly lower by approximately 1-2 dB.

As a result, the EN1000's midrange sounded slightly much relaxed and shoutyness are none to be heard, with the most balanced presentation right in-between forward/recessed with softer, organic tonality compared to the black plug. Sibilance and the sharp treble can still be heard with this plug although at a much tolerable level. Low frequencies also sounded slightly fuller with greater bass weight although in overall sense this IEM is still considered bass light.

  • Red Plug (C3A045)
Meanwhile, for this red plug it is opposite to the function of the black plug. For example, low frequencies have a bassier, fuller and richer impact with this plug. The midrange presentation being the least forward, much warmer/darker in terms of tonality and richer overall.

In addition, in the high frequency area it is clearly more comfortable and relaxed. Although, it loses a little treble presence and extension and treble clarity is also a bit less clear. However, sharp treble and sibilance were the least which made this combination very suitable for people who are sensitive to treble.


LRM_20230626_032618 (1).jpg

Comparison

TRI Audio iOne + TRI Clarion eartips (1DD – USD$279/MYR1279)​

In this comparison, iOne right from the beginning shown that this IEM has a higher bass shelf with a sound signature that focuses on the classic Harman V-shaped sound that is synonymous with the masses. With a wider sub-bass extension, more texture, definition and an emphasis on the mid-upper bass indeed presents a richer, solid bass with a heavier bass quantity compared to the EN1000. The bass on the iOne were also much agile with greater anticipation and control to the EN1000.

As for the midrange, the iOne has a more laid back and relaxed presentation due to its midrange being a lot more recessed compared to the EN1000. Although, that seems to differ the characteristics of both IEM yet they share a similar colouration despite the iOne was able to present more texture and definition on vocals especially in men compared to the EN1000 which emphasizes a light, fresher midrange with a higher amount of clarity and detail.

Finally, for treble and technicality of both IEMs have similar airiness and horizontal soundstaging but frontally there is more depth on the EN1000. Even so, the treble on the iOne is more relaxed and free from any sibilance nor harshness. Nevertheless, EN1000 were able to provide a much energetic treble and more clarity. Detail retrieval is more or less similar, however, on the EN1000 the resolution is noticeably clearer even at low volumes as expected from an IEM that emphasizes treble. Even so, the iOne has a wider and much extended dynamic range compared to the EN1000, plus the ability to display more accurate spatial imaging also favors the iOne.


Conclusion
To conclude the whole review about the Simgot "King Wonder" EN1000, it is a very versatile IEM in presenting music of various genres and presented in one quality package in my view. Its ability to provide the 3 types of sound signature that listeners want in one whole package which complimented with an astounding artistic artwork and brilliant construction, is truly able to captivate the hearts of many audiences who care about the aesthetic value of their IEMs that matches its sound quality.

Like a sovereign where there was sat a king which his fate is similar to nature of mortal beings. But, due to the existence between cooperation and synergy among his people, a prosperous and united government was built.

Similarly, as the reader are already aware of the shortcomings of this EN1000 which might attract negative reactions, but it can be helped by combining the various tuning plugs and selections of eartips that may bear a fruit of a strong synergy. Thus, this is also marks the end of my review this time. I hope you all enjoy it as I am happy to present you with this Simgot King Wonder EN1000 review, hopefully we will meet in the next review!


Additional Test Track
Artemis - Lindsey Stirling 44.1kHz

添迷不悔(Zhi Mi Bu Hui) - Faye Wong DSD256

Would? (MTV Unplugged) – Alice in Chains 44.1kHz

First Love - Hikaru Utada 44.1kHz

Motherboard - Daft Punk DSD256

Something About Us 44.1kHz

Automatic – Hikaru Utada 44.1kHz

Attachments

  • LRM_20230602_011345.jpg
    LRM_20230602_011345.jpg
    9.5 MB · Views: 0
Last edited:

n0varay

New Head-Fier
Hill Audio × Alpha Omega Voyager
Pros: > Diffused-field tuning with emphasis on midrange.
> Lush, richly coloured midrange
> Solid timbre quality, detail retrieval and separation.
> Budget friendly.
> Luxurious build quality and stunning handpainted shell.
> Provided with plenty amount of accessories.
Cons: > Noticeable amount of sibilance.
> Lacking in dynamics with short decay.
> Lacking in sub-bass and treble extension.
> Vocal and instruments can be a tad shouty and intense.
> Occasionally showing veiled treble.
Hill Audio × Alpha Omega Voyager (Hifi Version) - Compagnon de Voyage

LRM_20230601_013821.jpg


Disclaimer

  • This is my own personal unit and all opinions are original ideas, hence there’s zero influence and external opinion.
  • No EQ or filter presets are used throughout the writing period.

For those who are interested to purchase, can head to the Shopee link below (non-affiliated);
https://shopee.com.my/Hillaudio-x-A...In-ear-Monitor-Earphone-i.6548893.22868269893

Introduction
Hill Audio, a name that’s no stranger among Malaysian audiophile community. Likewise, in the ears of seasoned audiophiles on Head-Fi when being brought back to memories of their sought after Altair•RA, S8, Vajra 3 and Empyrean. Offering solid sound quality with a built to match at an affordable price for the masses.

During the early start of this year, Hill Audio has been working secretly to create an another entry-level IEM alongside Alpha Omega. Which is also a local brand being based very close to my hometown in the city of Kuching, Sarawak. This brand might rings a bell as well to some international audience, as they are formally known for their meticulous craftsmanship and creative artworks as a high-end custom in-ear brand. AO for short, has released plenty stunning IEMs such as the TOTL Omegon, Iota, Lambda and plenty more.

With all the pleasantries are done, alongside me in this review is their first-ever collaboration project, known as the Hill Audio × Alpha Omega Voyager. The Voyager came in two variants to choose which are the Bass Version and Hifi Version. For this review, I will only cover for the Hifi Version, since it is much more aligned to my preference and both models shares the same tuning apart from the bass spectrum. The Voyager features a single full-range balance armature (BA), custom in-house molded resin and also an innovative crossover circuit design. As quoted from AO’s Facebook homepage;

“By employing an innovative crossover circuit designs, we enabled a full-range BA driver to produce different sound. As a result, we offer a Hifi version with a more balanced and neutral sound profile, as well as a Bass Version for those seeking a more impactful experience.”

With all that being said, let’s get straight into the review!


LRM_20230601_011312.jpg
LRM_20230531_232907 (2).jpg


Unboxing Experience
Unboxing the Voyager was no hassle at all to say the least, unscathed from the bells and whistles and gimmickry as the saying goes, “Less is more”. The package itself has a brilliant illustration on the front, while at the back has all the informations regarding the basic specifications of the Voyager and a frequency response graph was also printed at the back.

Upon opening the box, you will be greeted with a basic earphone case which contains the IEM itself inside, alongside a generic SPC copper cable with an inline mic, reminiscent to most the stock cable on ultra budget IEMs. Included inside the case were also 2 sets of silicone eartips which are packed neatly into two separate small hard plastic cases.

On closer inspection on the provided eartips, both set of eartips actually serves two different purposes and aren’t intentionally colour coded for mere aesthetics. The blue eartips has a wider bore and stiffer stem meanwhile, the green ones are much softer and has a narrower bore.

By conducting a quick eartip rolling, the green eartips minimally enhance the mid-upper bass quantity, being it has a bit more rounded and also an emphasis on treble which highlights sibilance a tad more noticeable. Whilst the blue eartips reduces the bass quantity and allows slightly greater treble extension without accentuating much sibilance and harshness.


Specifications
  • Driver : Single full-range balanced armature
  • Impedance: 20 Ohms
  • Sensitivity : 118dB± SPL/1mW
  • Frequency Response: 20Hz-20kHz
  • Cable: L-plug 3.5mm (with mic) to 0.78mm, 1.2 meter 4 core SPC copper cable

LRM_20230601_015432 (1).jpg


Build/Comfort
As far as build is concerned, the Voyager is tiny yet these are supremely well-made, rigid with brilliant craftsmanship and aesthetics. There were zero air bubbles in the molded resin housing and the surface were polished smooth as well. These are considered featherweight, it weighs almost nothing, the Voyager is ergonomically user-friendly that allows comfortable experience even for prolonged hours of listening. Due to its smaller frame, the Voyager is suitable even for those who has smaller ears. As far as isolation is concerned, this IEM provides great passive isolation, reliably eliminates most background noise and surpresses loud noises very well.

Furthermore, the design is brought out even more with the exclusively handpainted galaxy-themed artwork chosen for this collaboration project as quoted from Alpha Omega’s post on Facebook;

"The galaxy-themed artworks and the name Voyager were chosen to symbolize embarking on a maiden voyage into new territories, as Voyager represents the origin of everything.”

The artwork were pristinely made, vibrant with no blemishes which might as well fooled somebody thinking that the Voyager is a luxurious pair of IEM. I have personally tested numerous IEMs from Alpha Omega in the past and very impressed by its build quality. Its certainly no surprise to see great deal of quality exuded into the Voyager considering, it’s their speciality to present such high quality craftsmanship into each of their product.



Testing Equipment
  • Apple Music/Spotify + Local files via HiBy Music > Letshuoer DT02 DAC/AMP dongle (1 Vrms@32 Ohms and 2 Vrms@300 Ohms)
  • Laptop
  • Smartphone


Power Requirements
As we move along, the Voyager has a sensitivity rated at 118dB± SPL/1mW with an impedance of 20 Ohms. It’s easy to drive even from the Letshuoer DT02 dongle which has a power output rated at 1 Vrms at 32 Ohms (SE) with plenty headroom to spare.

Using the in-app volume of the HiBy Music app as a reference, I’m only required to press up to 5 to 7/32 on the volume button to achieve comfortable listening volume which vastly depends on the track itself. Background noise such as humming, white noise aren’t noticeable in any sort via the Voyager when plugged into the Letshouer DT02 dongle, laptop and smartphone.

1686342062848.png

Graph 1 : A frequency response graph of the Voyager. All due credit to Muhd Farid Ibrahim a fellow reviewer on Facebook for providing the database.
Initial Impression
Upon listening to the Voyager for the first time, this IEM is skewed towards being a tonally balanced-warm set. Tuning wise, it has a diffused-field neutral profile with a bass emphasis starting from the mid-bass up into midrange frequency, which drops to neutral in the midrange slightly past 1kHz.

To my surprise, the separation that the Voyager could produce was totally unexpected, along with its capability to present timbre for instruments and percussions were commendably precise for a single BA set. As further assessment was done, there was a fair amount of sibilance that could be heard especially if the Voyager is paired with the provided green eartips.


Low Frequency
The Voyager for the Hifi Version as we speak, presents low-end that could be described as lean, tight and polite. There’s a sub-bass roll-off at 60Hz, which affects the sub-bass extension as most rumbles were soft and vastly could only be heard instead of being felt. Listening to the bass rendition at the start of the song Would? (MTV Unplugged) – Alice in Chains, the Voyager could not provide the subtle grunt and rumbles off the rendition clearly. Despite that being said, this IEM presents the rendition tonally well, there’s adequate bass weight and texture behind the notes to execute the song competently although the clarity was decent at best.

Moving on, the Voyager has a superbly tight mid to upper bass that definitely gave an element of surprise, due to its capability to deliver a bass impact that felt similar to a quality dynamic driver. Each bass hits were tight, tactile and anticipated with great attack although in terms of impact is rather on the more polite/soft side. Reverberations and bass decay/transients were short, not the most dynamic sounding but positively expected from a BA driver. Testing the Voyager with Hunter – Björk and Angel – Massive Attack definitely had the IEM struggles to keep up with the rumbles and extension although its capable to deliver adequate impact rapidly.

Mid Frequency
Midrange is where the Voyager thrive, as it posseses a tuning that’s being a midrange oriented. This IEM has a solid midrange performance for a budget pair, the extra emphasis into the midrange by a couple decibels definitely gave the Voyager obvious colouration but as well as unwanted muddiness.

The Voyager has a warmly lush, forward and detailed midrange, it presents vocal brilliantly well with solid clarity and articulation, the added warmth made vocals are much emphasised but it might be a tad shouty and intense occasionally for females, sopranos, trumpets and other similar instruments. Although that’s the case, separation on vocals was solid on this IEM. Tuning into First Love – Hikaru Utada and Off The Wall – Micheal Jackson, vocals were separated brilliantly with strong forward presence detached into its own spotlight really well, alongside other instruments and elements in both songs.

Timbres on percussions and instruments sounds quite organic and were easily distinguish from each other, with a warm tonality. Listening to usual test track which is Mediterranean Sundance – Al Di Meola, acoustic guitars sounds lush, detailed and a joy to hear upon each pluck, but a tad overly warm. Meanwhile, testing using the song Psychosocial – Slipknot every elements were well separated with solid detail and clarity, cowbell hits on the far right side was clearly audible and free from melding with other elements

High Frequency
As we reach the top, the Voyager has an overall inoffensive, crisply detailed, musical and cool treble. Despite that being said, it can be somewhat veiled occasionally. There’s a definite lacking in terms of treble extension, which does unfortunately affect the airiness to some extend. Treble sparkle were also seemed to be blunt and certain sound such as crashes and snares could be heard splashy.

Moreover, the Voyager suffers slight sibilance that might turn into a deal breaker for certain audience who are sensitive to harsh and sharp treble. Despite that being the case, the provided blue eartips does slightly deter the problem to a much tolerable degree.

Nonetheless, tonal wise for the treble on the Voyager favours much towards the warmer side as well, there’s minimal amount of additional note weight and warmth on brighter sounding stringed instruments and percussions. For example, sounds of swords clashing at the background in the track Artemis – Lindsey Stirling sounded much warmer and chlunky as supposed to be brighter and metallic sounding.

As I fiddle around with plenty of eartips and cable to try on the Voyager. Higher quality silver-plated copper (SPC) cables gave a noticeable upgrade compared to the stock cable, as it helps to add more clarity into the midrange region that was affected by the muddiness/bass bloat. Treble sounded much airy and extended as well. I did also try to pair the Voyager with pure silver cable, which gave almost similar effect but stumbles along the way as it accentuate the sibilance which became far too fatiguing for me to enjoy.

For the choice of eartips, I simply prefer a medium density foams such as the Acoustune AT02 and Hill Audio Ergo Pro as it provides the much needed airiness and treble sparkle that the Voyager needed without affecting the bass lesser as thinner foams do. The FiiO HS18 also deserves to be on the lists due to its capability to provide a bouncy, meatier bass impact.


Technical Ability
When speaking in regards of technicality, what stands out the most for the Voyager was the separation as mentioned before. It held up well even with busier tracks such as Timbres – Yosi Horikawa, the Voyager competently managed to perform without any congestion although layering wise was average at best.

Detail retrieval in the other hand was unexpectedly great, the Voyager could dish out plenty of microdetails and subtle nuances even at low volume levels. Although when speaking about resolution, it was quite mediocre at best as it all seems quite blurry and unrefined.

Soundstage was average as well, giving an illusion of space that still exists within inside the head. Dwelling deeper into depth, the Voyager has an advantage in presenting wider width compared to its frontal staging. Imaging wise it can be said that the Voyager could present it plenty sharp, pinpointing movements of a triangle while being continuously hit in Rhythm – Jamey Haddad weren’t much of a problem, definitely deserves a praise for a budget oriented set.

Meanwhile, in terms of dynamic range, the Voyager presents an average dynamic range performance. For example, by using the Ultimate Headphone Test - ABYSS Headphone dynamic range test as a reference. Explained in short, a sample sound of a drum and a bell are played simultaneously as much as 7 counts, but only the sound of the bells will become quieter. Hence, from a scale of 7 counts, the Voyager was able to produce an audible 5 out of 7 counts.


Comparisons
Moondrop Quarks (non-DSP)
The Moondrop Quarks on my set is equipped with E Pro EP01 Horn eartips, hence your experience may differ.
  • Both posssess similar bass quality but the Quarks has a much booted bass yet softer impact compared to the leaner, tighter and harder hitting Voyager. Both IEMs presented almost similar mid bass quantity as well but the Quarks presented it with a tad more body and boldness. The Voyager were also beaten in the sub-bass region due to its roll-off as the Quarks being more dynamic with slower decay.
  • The Moondrop Quarks is a much more laid back in the midrange, as well it has a lot intimate soundstaging compared to the Voyager. Midrange clarity, timbre and tonal balance in the Voyager edges the Quarks by a mile, excellently distinguish and separates vocals, instruments and percussions alike.
  • Treble and technical in the other hand belongs to the Voyager, as it possesses better treble quality and energy, detail retrieval as well as spatial imaging to the Quarks. Both IEMs has a fair share amount of sibilance, albeit the Quarks sounded much harsher/gritty meanwhile, the Voyager skewed towards sharper sound.


Conclusion
To conclude, for RM119 (US$25) Hill Audio’s collaboration project with Alpha Omega has offered a tremendous set for audiophiles without burning a hole in the pocket with the Voyager. Well suited for beginners and experienced alike, who are getting themselves newly into this hobby or a temporary stop from chasing the utmost endgame which never really came.

The Voyager is perfect for those wanting to start their audiophile voyage with something different to the traditional dynamic driver, as most pure BA set especially from a CIEM brand would cost them higher amount of budget. Its build and finish were plenty luxurious for a budget set, while still being capable to present a competent sound quality performance that matches an even more expensive IEM truly deserves a lot of praise.

Of course with all being said, the Voyager is not the perfect bargain chip within the budget IEM realm. Perhaps, one may have been too critical with his judgements when writing this review. But in all honesty, for what its worth and the fact that you could get both flavours between Bass and Hifi version for still a shy above $50 is a bargain. The Voyager in essence is a companion that you can grow with, an endless voyage into this hobby. There’s plenty more potential that it could give even with a simple tweak such as eartips and cable rolling that’ll always leads discovery into the uncharted territory, hence also wrapping up this review of the Hill Audio × Alpha Omega Voyager.

Plenty appreciation for reading this review and hope to see you in my next review!
Last edited:

n0varay

New Head-Fier
Dressage DS4+2 Hybrid IEM
Pros: > Vigorous, mature and masterfully controlled bass
> Gorgeously crystal clear and highly detailed midrange and vibrant highs
> Spacious soundstage with plenty of airiness as well as competently deliver amazing level of microdetails and subtle nuances
> Comfy, secured deep insertion while still weighs almost nothing
> Premium yet simple, straightforward packaging
> Ample amount of accessories, solid carrying case as well
Cons: < Requires considerable amount of time to burn-in, hence be patient...
< Sibilance issue that still persists even after burn-in, despite being tolerable (well, at least for me)
< Requires further investment to get proper eartips and cable, to further enhance its quality
< Cheap feeling, flimsy cable
< Expensive, peculiar pricing as well

Dressage DS4+2 - Exuberance Under The Bright Hong Kong Lights​


LRM_20230426_021206.jpg


Disclaimer
- This is my own personal unit and all opinions are original ideas, hence there’s zero influence and external opinion.
- No EQ or filter presets are used throughout the writing period.

Introduction
With the majority of audio enthusiasts increasingly chasing the trend of the mainstream Chi-Fi market lately, I have turned my interest to find IEMs among the cracks and nooks of the used audio market. Until, I came across a hybrid IEM from a brand called Dressage. With a slightly skeptical feeling and the absence of a frequency response graph, I took the opportunity to buy a pair. I must say, it is a rather risky purchase. However, as the proverb say, fortune always favors the brave.

With that, I would like to introduce Dressage DS4+2. An IEM introduced back in 2016 and sold at a price of almost a whopping $600 (HK$4680) at DMAG Hong Kong. However, it can also be found at a much lower price depending on the worldwide balanced armature demand and promotions, based on the info I personally acquired from one of Dressage representatives.

Without any further delay, let's get into the review!


DRESSAGE, WHO ARE THEY?​

I personally never heard of Dressage before, although it was once mentioned on Head-Fi. So, it was quite difficult to get the information regarding brands that has less exposure to foreign markets such as Dressage. Therefore, most of the info I could find online as mostly unrelated or directly translated from Chinese/Japanese websites.

Dressage or "DS" as people in China would recognize them, was a brand that has been venturing in the audio market since 2014 according to one of the sources and is based in Hong Kong. They specialize in producing CIEMs for the high-end market although they did also offer some affordable models.

In addition, Dressage is quite well-known among audio enthusiasts within China and some in Japan as well. They have also produced several CIEM models, which are able to compete with CIEMs from big brands such as QDC, Fearless Audio, etc. For example, the DS EX3SE, DS 14T^3, DS E12^3 are sold starting from $1100 up to $2600 and apparently those models were among the top sellers and TOTL IEMs from the company.


FB_IMG_1679886686593.jpg
1682474518352.png

1682474699134.png
1682474726299.png


Unboxing Experience
It can be said that the presentation is complete and fine to its details yet straightforward. The packaging on this DS4+2 felt similar to unboxing an IEM that costs around $300 and above. As you open the box, you will be greeted with all the necessary accessories, for example a faux leather casing, a 1.2 meter 4 core OFC copper cable that was built like a stock cable that can be found in every $20 IEM, it was slightly stiff and thin with a mediocre cable memory, so to be honest it was pretty much underwhelming. In addition, there are 12 pairs of generic silicone eartips, a drawstring mesh pouch and the IEM itself.


Specifications
Driver : 10mm LCP (Liquid Crystal Polymer) diaphragm, 10mm Titanium diaphragm, dual Sonion 33AP007, single Sonion 2389 and single Knowles RAD-33518
Impedance: 24 Ohms
Sensitivity : ±110 dB/SPL
Frequency Response: 10Hz-20kHz
Cable: L-plug 3.5mm to 0.78mm, 1.2 meter 4 core OFC copper cable


1682474360168.png


Build/Comfort
To start things off, the overall design of the DS4+2 is quite large, yet it weights almost nothing. Inside the shell of this IEM, there are a total of 12 drivers, with 6 on each side housed in a carefully crafted resin enclosure.

All of the drivers as in this IEM can be purchased online at a much more user-friendly price. But take it like painting masterpiece, a professional painter can reproduce the work from scratch. However, the personal touch of the original artist itself is not something that is easy to replicate.

As we move on, there are some small air bubbles trapped inside the resin but they do not significantly affect the structure nor the look of this IEM. While the rest, this DS4+2 has a solid and neat build without any rough surfaces or edges. Although, the shell of this IEM is quite wide, but the DS4+2 has a very comfortable and light fitting, as well as a long nozzle that provides relatively deep insertion. The passive sound isolation is also good, the ambience sound can still be heard because there is a vent hole on each side of this IEM.


Testing Equipment
- Apple Music/Spotify + Local files via HiBy Music > Letshuoer DT02 DAC/AMP dongle (1 Vrms@32 Ohms and 2 Vrms@300 Ohms)
- Notebook
- Smartphones


Power Requirements
The DS4+2 has a sensitivity of 102 dB/SPL, this IEM is easy to drive using a smartphone or a low-power dongle and is quite sensitive as well to humming/white noises. By using the Letshuoer DT02 dongle, I’m only required to press once or twice on the volume button on my phone to get it to comfortable listening volume.

Even so, I prefer to use the DS4+2 with an amplifier/dongle that has a volume wheel instead of a volume button. However, I don't use the Aune X7s in this review. This is due the output impedance is rated too high at 10 Ohms which is likely to change the frequency response of this IEM.


Initial Impression
Initially, the DS4+2 had a piercing sound (might I say on par with some Beyers, cough) and was quite aggressive when I first received this IEM. You can say, I felt a little regretful at first, so I thought this IEM definitely needs some time to burn-in which might help.

Similar to medicines, it is advisable to shake prior eating to evenly distribute the active ingredients.

To my surprise, after completing a full burn-in session of 15+ hours or less. The DS4+2 sounds a lot smoother and much tolerable to listen, sibilance were still persistent but it sat between a fine line of being tame or noticeably annoying. Even when paired with the wide bore TRI Clarion eartips. Yes, you read it right, among the spiciest and most sibilant eartips in the current market other than the Moondrop Spring.

Low Frequency
In short, the DS4+2 offers a vigorous, mature and controlled bass, like an athlete who has a slim and fit body yet remarkably agile. Same goes with the DS4+2, it has a nimble, tight bass response with a body and bass quantity that is balanced between a warm, full-bodied rich bass and a lean, softer much polite bass. This results to a bass timbre that is slightly warmer, also I could not find any mud in this IEM that could effect further frequencies. The sub-bass performance handled by the LCP driver, provides a textured, detailed bass rumble and in terms of layering was also very good. The bass rendition in the song Would? – Alice in Chains for example, although the bass guitar does not have a thick and rich notes, this IEM were still able to provide a clean, very detailed presentation and a satisfyingly engaging in terms of bass texture delivery throughout the song.

Even so, the entire bass spectrum on the DS4+2 was not the most dynamic nor does it has an entensive transient, slow bass decay like most other IEMs that shares a V-shape tuning. Finally, to complete the low frequency aspect, the mid/upper-bass which is handled by the titanium driver easily delivers a powerful, tactile bass attack and strong dense impact. For example, the songs Angel - Massive Attack and Hunter - Björk gives an impression which every bass impact was anticipated with a rapid slap on a concrete wall.


Mid Frequency
For midrange quality, this IEM performs really well, although sometimes it's a bit blurry or hazy depending on the music/genre and the type of eartips used. In addition, there is minimal colouration which gave a slight hint of warmth into the midrange and vocals are also presented at a moderate distance, not intimately close nor too far recessed. However, what I really liked about the midrange on the DS4+2, was how this IEM easily provide an immersive experience, a little warm with the colouration and smoothly handling heavy vocals like in Come Away With Me - Norah Jones and A Poem Titled You – Taeyeon.

Effortless, is the word that can be expressed, in terms of the articulation of each word inside the lyrics was clearly heard, although the resolution of vocal grain for example the emphasis on raspy, musky, breathy vocals and etc was not so noticeable. In fact, the DS4+2 also handles acoustic tracks very well, exhibiting an almost organic timbre even though there was only a slight BA timbre. For example, in the song Don't Speak - No Doubt and Mediterranean Sundance - Al Di Meola where the acoustic guitar tone has a melodious, euphonic and highly detailed tone, each strum has enough bite and each tapping sound on the body of the guitar was clearly heard.


High Frequency
Speaking of treble, DS4+2 presents it with a tone that is a tad bright even for a treble head and slightly aggressive as well. But in terms of treble quality, this IEM produces a clean, vibrant and very detailed presentation with moderate resolution. The timbre on this DS4+2 is a little unnatural, due to the slight BA timbre, so occasionally it could sound glassy/tizzy. Meanwhile, the treble extension on the DS4+2 is quite good which provides an airy experience without exhibiting any harshness.

Anyway, back to the aforementioned sibilance that persists on the DS4+2 even after burn-in. Well, although it has undergone proper burn-in, it does gave the IEM a much tame and pleasing treble, sibilance is much tolerable which could be possibly further decreased. With that being said, this indirectly causes this IEM to be unsuitable for genres such as J-Pop, Metal, Rap/Hip-Hop and some Electronic as well. Furthermore, sometimes the treble on these IEMs will sound a bit splashy, especially with certain eartips such as the stock eartips, Sony EP-EX11 or similar.

LRM_20230426_023100.jpg


I found that eartips such as Azla Xelastec, JVC Spiral Dot and E Pro EP01 Horn-shaped work very well to maximize the treble quality of this IEM in addition to reducing the sibilance effect without affecting treble extension in any way, and even increasing the clarity, as well as forwardness in the midrange. Changing the cable to SPC (Silver Plated Copper) or Pure Silver such as NiceHCK 4N LitzPS/LitzPS-Pro also helps to refinening softer treble tone, provides a wider soundstage and airiness compared to stock cables that use pure copper which sounds a lot aggressive and harsh.


Technical Ability
Technically speaking, the DS4+2 has a relatively wide and tall soundstage in terms of width and height, yet could only presents frontal stage at a normal depth. Next, detail retrieval which is the ability to display microdetails, subtle nuances in the song on this IEM was crystal clear. For example, the sound of an airplane at the beginning of the song Hotel California (1976) – Eagles, and also the word "Shoot me" by John Lennon in Come Together - The Beatles are clearly displayed even at low volumes. That’s being said, the DS4+2 has left me feeling unsatisfied with its mediocre imaging, some of the drum beats in the Drum Improvisation - Jim Keltner seem inaccurate. However, the separation and layering for this IEM was merely decent and a bit congested, especially on songs that have various elements such as Cindai - Dato' Siti Nurhaliza and Timbres - Yosi Horikawa.

Meanwhile, in terms of dynamic range, the DS4+2 presents a wide dynamic range. For example, in the Ultimate Headphone Test - ABYSS Headphone, which the sound of a drum and a bell are played simultaneously as much as 7 counts, but only the sound of the bells will become quieter. Hence, from a scale of 7 counts, the DS4+2 was able to produce 6 out of 7 counts clearly.


Conclusion
Overall, the DS4+2 was a blind buy that had me wielding a double-edged sword because there are some attributes about this IEM that I am personally interested in. For example, in terms of bass response, where as someone who likes bass that is more towards DF-neutral, but at the same time wants something that is more exciting, this DS4+2 delivers that experience very well. In addition to that, the midrange and its ability to capture microdetails as well as subtle nuances was also the reason I fancy this IEM.

However, due to its shortcomings, the DS4+2 is not an all-rounder, versatile IEM and requires further investment to find the suitable eartips to fix some of the caveats. But rest assured, if you are a fan of Rock/Alternative Rock, Orchestra, Pop, R&B and some Electronic artists such as Daft Punk. The DS4+2 will execute the task very well, although realistically there are plenty IEMs that can perform better considering that this is an old set and most IEMs within the $500 range nowadays are tuned much better.

Regardless, it was a unique experience to be able to listen a well-crafted IEM from brands that are rarely heard of to the outside world such as Dressage. With that also, marks the end of my review this time, hopefully everyone thoroughly enjoyed my sharing and till next time!


Test Track
A Poem Titled You – Taeyeon 44.1kHz

Anesthetize – Porcupine Tree DSD256

Come Away With Me - Norah Jones 192kHz

Angel - Massive Attack 44.1kHz

Mediterranean Sundance - Al Di Meola DSD256

Hunter – Björk 44.1kHz

Hollow (16 bit Remix) – Björk 44.1kHz

First Love - Hikaru Utada 44.1kHz

Artemis - Lindsey Stirling 44.1kHz

The Only Exception – Paramore 44.1kHz

The Sound of Muzak - Porcupine Tree DSD256

Motherboard - Daft Punk DSD256

添迷不悔 (Zhi Mi Bu Hui) - Faye Wong DSD256

Cindai - Dato' Siti Nurhaliza 44.1kHz

Don't Speak - No Doubt 192kHz

Keroncong Hybrid For Bidadari - Pot Amir 44.1kHz

Would? – Alice in Chains 44.1kHz

Brother – Alice in Chains 44.1kHz

Timbres – Yosi Horikawa 44.1kHz

Poster Child – Red Hot Chili Peppers 192kHz

Californication – Red Hot Chili Peppers 192kHz

Attachments

  • LRM_20230426_021206.jpg
    LRM_20230426_021206.jpg
    8.4 MB · Views: 0
  • FB_IMG_1679886686593.jpg
    FB_IMG_1679886686593.jpg
    145.9 KB · Views: 0
  • LRM_20230426_021826 (2).jpg
    LRM_20230426_021826 (2).jpg
    9.7 MB · Views: 0
  • LRM_20230426_023100.jpg
    LRM_20230426_023100.jpg
    5.6 MB · Views: 0
  • 1682474111507.png
    1682474111507.png
    691.4 KB · Views: 0
  • 1682474149111.png
    1682474149111.png
    684.4 KB · Views: 0
Last edited:

n0varay

New Head-Fier
BQEYZ Winter - Too Cold to Handle?
Pros: - Mild Harman tuning with slight emphasis on higher frequencies
- Minimalistic, understated design
- Brilliantly solid build quality
- Spacious soundstaging
- Sharp, precise spatial imaging
- Lush, euphonic midrange
- Generously packed with accessories
- Comfy fit
- Pleasingly airy treble
- Coherent dual-driver setup
Cons: - A bit overpriced
- Poor single-dynamic quality
- Peaky, harsh treble
- Prone to emit sibilance
- Decent isolation
LRM_20230103_150521.jpg


Disclaimer

First and foremost, I would love to express my utmost gratitude to BQEYZ and Edmund from AudioMonsta for organizing this Malaysia tour review of the BQEYZ Winter, all your efforts are greatly appreciated not just from me but from other fellow reviewers that has joined as well.
That’s being said, the following review was done entirely using stock eartips provided in the box and zero EQ is applied to prevent any personal bias throughout the whole testing period. I’ve also yet to experience the previous models under the seasonal series (eg; Autumn, Spring and etc) releases of BQEYZ in-ear monitors, hence my comments and comparisons are limited to what I currently have.
Lastly, a gentle reminder that all opinions and thoughts are solely based on my experience, sound preference which is vastly tilted towards Diffused-field target. My impressions also will be based on my knowledge about sound in general and finally, BQEYZ nor any third-party connections has zero influence on me to say anything good or bad about the product.


Introduction
BQEYZ Winter is the fourth in-ear monitor under BQEYZ’s seasonal flagship series that was released late during 2022. Following to the success of previous releases like Spring, Summer and Autumn, BQEYZ decided to release the Winter which finalize the complete all four seasons.

Similarly to the previous seasonal flagships too, each of them are designed with unique driver combinations for example the Spring and Summer were tribrids and the Autumn was designed with a single-dynamic configuration. Likewise with the Winter, is designed with a hybrid dual-driver arrangement that houses a 12mm polyarylate (PAR) diapghram single-dynamic driver and an 11.6mm Piezoelectric (PZT) Bone Conduction driver on each side. To add more, supposedly the single-dynamic will be in charged producing the sound for low and mid frequencies, while the PZT driver is in charge for delivering high frequencies, which is quite uncommon given the that most bone conduction drivers are meant to deliver low and mid frequencies. But either way, it will be interesting to test out how BQEYZ managed to implement this technology into their IEM.

For your information too, the Winter retails for around $239 which makes it the cheapest in-ear monitor with a Bone Conduction driver at a fairly competitive price bracket between $200-300 which has seen pretty impressive, outstanding IEM releases by other brands. Without further ado, let’s jump straight into the review!


Specifications
  • Driver: 12mm Single-dynamic Driver with Polyarylate (PAR) diaphragm + 11.6mm Piezoelectric (PZT) Bone Conduction Driver.
  • Impedance: 38 Ohms
  • Sensitivity: 113 dB/SPL
  • Frequency: 5-40KHz
  • Cable Length: 1.2m
  • Cable Specifications: 4 core braided crystal copper plated silver (SPC) cable
  • Connection Type: 0.78mm 2-pin with 3.5mm Single-ended and 2.5mm/4.4mm Pentaconn Balanced

11957756.jpg


Packaging
Packaging wise, pretty much similar to the previous BQEYZ releases that I’ve seen over the past which is a basic small box, featuring a simple flip box, behind a slide cover which has all the informations regarding the IEM such as specifications and etc. There’s nothing seemed overly fancy or flashy about it but as you unbox even much further, you will be greeted with the Winter itself resting on a cut-out foam which securely hold the IEM in place and considerably loads of essential and miscellaneous accessories as per expected since this is a flagship model.

To make things brief, here are the listed accessories you will receive upon unboxing;
  • Standard faux leather travel case with BQEYZ embedded brand on top.
  • An eartip organizer made from metal which houses up to 6 pair of eartips
  • 3 pairs of “Atmosphere” eartips of different sizes
  • 3 pairs of “Reference” eartips of different sizes
  • 3 pairs of generic spare eartips of different sizes
  • A pair of BQEYZ Comply foam
  • A cleaning brush
  • A Velcro tape for cable
  • Couple paperworks regarding manual and quality control (QC) card

LRM_20230103_154115.jpg


LRM_20230103_153714.jpg


Cable provided by BQEYZ for the Winter is a basic 4 core crystal copper, silver plated cable (SPC) with a 2-pin (0.78mm) connection which is common for most IEMs nowadays. The unit I received in particular is in 4.4mm Pentaconn plug but also available in 2.5mm balanced and 3.5mm single-ended. It’s a good cable in my opinion, nothing too extravagant about it, they’re fairly light, soft, non-microphonic when in contact with clothes or surfaces and resistant to tangle up quite well.


Build/Comfort
BQEYZ nailed it again regarding the build quality of the Winter which followed the rest of previous model, it features a fully lightweight metal shell that’s CNC milled meticulously and precise. Combined with an anodized matte black finish, the metallic turquoise colour along the perimeter of the IEM and wavelines on the faceplate that “resembles skiing terrain” by BQEYZ, gives the Winter a special distinctive look. As far as connections are concerned, the Winter uses similar 2-pin (0.78mm) connections that are sturdy and firm as with all the previous seasonal BQEYZ in-ear release. The Winter is available in multiple colour to choose from, such as Black and Silver with either Metallic Green or Rose Gold faceplate rims.

The in-ear itself is pretty lightweight in my hands despite the large shell which in comparison were marginally larger to the TRI iOne. Not to be fooled by the size, but a pair of Winter (without cable) is as light as the Acoustune RS One, and still marginally lighter than one piece of the iOne. In terms of comfort, ergonomically the Winter is quite comfy given when used with suitable eartips, this is due to the large, stubby nozzle and the awkwardly designed arc that supposedly rest on your cymba cochlea similar to the iOne. Except, the Winter has a much extreme arc shape that seems to hit and miss whilst wearing them on which seems to give an impact to the isolation which might be a problem if you have a weirdly shaped ear, but personally so I think the fit is well for everybody.


Isolation
In terms of isolation, the Winter seals a fine snug even with my best effort to find the best seal as possible with the stock eartips. Furthermore, the vent holes on each side of the IEM for the bone conduction and single-dynamic impacts the overall seal capability of the Winter as well. During my personal test, even when using the provided “Atmospehere” tips which gave the best isolation, yet I could still hear my surrounding quite well as if I’m using foam eartips, these compromises could be taken into account if listeners would want to use them in public environment.


Scalability/Source
I tested the Winter through multiple platforms such as;

  • Spotify + Local files (FLAC, WAV, DSD) via Foobar2000 on laptop (-5.00dB) > SMSL Sanskrit 10th MKII > Aune X7s
  • Local files (FLAC, WAV, DSD) via HibyMusic Player (in-app volume on 15) > Letshuoer DT02 DAC/AMP dongle
  • Notebook
  • Smartphones

Based on my methodology and available equipments at the period, the BQEYZ Winter is an in-ear that requires quite some juice to make it sing really well. They’re harder to drive than my iOne which I usually would set on 10-1030 o’clock position. In comparison, to the Winter which requires me to crank the volume knob on my Aune X7s up to 12-1 o’clock position. Similar to the level which I powered my Acoustune RS One with all of them are tested on low gain settings.

Even so, I think that the Winter will run quite decently off a phone. But investing on a decent dongle, DAP or portable DAC/AMP would be better to maximise the Winter performance whlist maintain portability, since in today’s day and age those devices are just at the end of your fingertips.



BQEYZ Frequency Response.jpg

Diagram 1: Frequency response graph for BQEYZ Winter. Courtesy of Wei Hangz, a fellow member of this tour review.


Sound Quality
BQEYZ Winter is tuned more inclined towards a much milder variant of the Harman Curve or V-shape as some would call it. To me, the Winter sounded in between analytical and balanced with all frequencies are evenly distributed. That’s being said, there’s a tad emphasis in the higher frequencies which gave the Winter its analytical tone. Briefly speaking low frequency region, the Winter presents a fair gentle, ample bass punch and each impact greeted with a polite punch but also a tad dry in term of tonal quality, so bassheads might want to look away from this set. Furthermore, treble produced by the Piezo (PZT) bone conduction driver, was rather.. unamusingly cold. They are not bad by any means, but in my opinion it is something that listeners with treble sensitivity should keep in mind. In my opinion, it was rather harsh almost as if it was gritty depends on tracks and genres I tuned-in. The only redeeming factor that I would give the Winter a listen was that its midrange is well-done, lusciously warm and nicely pristine, it just somewhat brings something that comforts us which I will explain much futher in detail.

  • Low Frequencies (Bass)
Starting off with the bass response, the Winter provides listener with a lean, mildly warm low-end character. There’s not a lot of bass punch to savour but it is certainly ample to give a feel of enjoyment, each impact that hits was tight yet the mid to upper bass impact is rather a polite chest. The Winter presents bass cleanly, free from mud or bleed towards the rest of the frequencies but mediocre in terms of mid to sub-bass depth. Tonally, it could sound quite dry and unamusing sometimes but I’m sure it is fixeable with the right eartips or system synergy. Despite the setbacks, the Winter impressed me with brilliantly snappy, tactile bass speed which I tested playing the track Hunter by Björk, and could easily be said that the Winter handled it well above my expectation.
Diving deeper to test the sub-bass region, was where the Winter also starts to falls short. I played my usual track to test for sub-bass and etc, which is Hollow (16-bit Remix) by Björk, followed with bad guy by Billie Eilish. I could tell that the polyarylate driver that powers the low to mid frequencies was struggling poorly to produce sub-bass rumble, reverberations, mediocre detail clarity and texture. To add more, bass decay was rather fast for a dynamic driver, despite its larger 12mm size. Even so, with the rest of the tracks such as Anesthetize by Porcupine Tree and couple more from Red Hot Chilli Peppers was pretty well, all instruments are distinguishable from one another, fairly decent energy but electric guitars and basses definitely lost their weighty, full bodied grunts by a fair amount which left me unamusingly cold.

  • Middle Frequencies (Midrange)
Next, moving onto the midrange, which to me was the strong key element to choose the Winter. Midrange on the Winter could be described as lush, articulated, pristine clean and euphonic. Colouration is moderate, evident within this region with decent forwardness giving listeners a sense of naturalness, vibrance and intimacy, sort of receiving a nice warm greeting. One of my favourite part, was when I gave a listen to a song titled, Keroncong Hybrid Untuk Bidadari by Pot Amir, a local Malaysian artist. Every time when it reached till chorus part of the song, voices of the backing vocalist joined harmony, coherently with the vocalist whilst their vocal tone still can be heard separately without any melding. Which I could not achieve in any of the in-ear that I compared the Winter to. Switching into something that’s more relaxing like Nightingale (Alternate Ver. Allaire Session) by Norah Jones. One of my favourite vocalist, again the Winter presents her vocal superbly smooth and fine even on the highest vocal point into that song which on some IEMs that I tested previously, will sound grainy and lack in body but the Winter done it brilliantly well with just the right amount colouration,

As I tested the Winter much further, clarity in identifying nuances within this region is quite decent during most of my listening session, I was able to pick up pretty much everything within the midrange spectrum audibly well. Brass, percussions and etc has pleasant warm tonality giving a fairly natural and organic experience, except strings instruments for example acoustic guitar and anything similarly to that might sound a tad thin especially within the high notes

  • High Frequencies (Treble)
Higher frequencies was where I began to doubt more about the Winter and the capabilities of the PZT bone conduction driver, because it was an experience of more to heard than felt but I would not speculate much, even so, I’m more than glad to try and see how it performs. Let’s start straight away with the good things. I would describe the treble on the Winter as cool instead of bright, it has a decent amount of treble energy, presence and plenty of air giving it a pleasant sense of cool wide ambience. The Winter presents higher frequencies with a fairly tame treble sparkle, crisp and brilliance, easy to listen and nowhere to be regarded as aggressive to most listeners

Now moving onto the negatives, and listeners with accentuated sensitivity to higher frequencies might want to look away. As much as the Winter is praised, this in-ear is prone to sibilance which can be harshly annoying and fatiguingly shrilling almost as if it was somewhat gritty especially if your genre is oriented to J-Pop, K-Pop, R&B and etc. Can’t be denied that I personally had to take them off for a break, after listening for 30-45 minutes. Other than that, timbrally some instruments and things like cymbals, hi-hats, crashes tonally sounded a tad thin and tizzy at times as well.



Technicalities

Right off the bat, let’s start with soundstaging. In my opinion, the soundstage of the Winter was spacious, airy it was above average I would safely say the Winter has a balanced panning of width, depth but falls a bit short on height. Then, combined with a sharp spatial imaging made it two of the strong technicalities of the Winter, listening to Rhythm by Jamey Haddad in his binaural album Explorations in Space and Time and I was able to follow closely to the sound of chimes panning to multiple directions and height. Meanwhile, in terms of detail retrieval the Winter capability able to pick up nuances were decent, an experience of hit and miss happens occasionally, which I expect should somewhat be better at least.

As we move on, layering presented by the Winter is pretty solid and I’m impressed by how the Winter was able to show differential stages between distances in couple tracks that I’ve tested with. Separation in the other hand was a whole different story, in my opinion it was pretty decent. For example, in the song War by Jamey Haddad, multiple sound of drums and cymbals hitting that are supposedly each separated were found to suffer a bit of melding. Lastly, dynamic range of the Winter was also decent, not the widest but can be regarded good nonetheless. As per usual, I used a WAV audio sample from ABYSS Headphones Test (in the video's description box) from ABYSS Headphones. Where they play a sound of a drum and a bell. The drum will always play at a constant volume, while the bell will gradually become quieter. Out of 7 counts, the Winter only managed to score 5 which is still average in my book.

LRM_20230105_041122.jpg


Comparisons
  • TRI Audio iOne (10mm, Carbon PET N52 NdFeB 1DD) - $279
TRI Audio iOne was also one of the flagship which was released later in 2022, it became one of my favourite in-ear due to its superb low frequency without neglecting technical performance. Priced only $40 more to the Winter but without the bone conduction technology, hence I decided to compare the two head-on.

Comparatively speaking, the iOne was definitely a bassier in-ear, and much relaxed, thicker and fuller note density which suitable for prolongued listening to the much cleaner, dryer sounding Winter that’s synonymous to analytical pair of in-ear. That’s being said, the iOne also offers better low frequency performance which I mentioned the Winter was severely lacking off. Sub-bass depth extends far deeper, much textured and dynamic range was hands down better on the iOne. Despite, both are sharing the same level of bass resolution and speed.

Next, speaking of midrange performance the Winter is definitely the clear winner here compared to the much recessed, much laid-back iOne. BQEYZ Winter presents a far greater and much forward presence to the iOne bringing vocal closer, an enhanced intimate experience to the listener whilst separating clearly instruments in the backgound. Winter is also has a much warmer, a tad cleaner, fuller timbre. Although, it fell a bit short in terms of midrange clarity and detail which what the iOne is in my opinion, superbly at.

Lastly, in the treble region and technical aspect the iOne is again almost all better against the Winter. I could not find the iOne to be sibilance compared to the Winter as per mention in the SQ. Treble presence, brilliance and detail retrieval was much better on the iOne. They’re far crisper, significantly less harsh, timbrally much organic and inoffensive compared to the harsher, peakier Winter. Albeit, the Winter is clear from any treble smearing, which I mentioned in my previous review regarding the TRI flagship. Both flagships offer similarly airy, sharp spatial imaging, and spacious soundstaging with the iOne were a tad more extended in terms of width and height, dynamic range was also much wider to the Winter.

  • Acoustune RS One (9.2mm, Myrinx 1DD) - $139-150
Next up on the list is the RS One, another single-dynamic coming from a brand that is no stranger within the audiophile community. Might also be asking yourself, what could an in-ear that’s significantly far cheaper have to offer against a $239 flagship?

Despite being cheaper, the RS One is far from incompetent to the Winter. Similar to the previous comparison, also being a much fun sounding pair, low-end performance for the RS One is much elevated, tonally warmer, bolder, and engagingly impactful mid-bass with every bass hits compared to the Winter. Moreover, the RS One has a much greater, deeper sub-bass depth and bass decay while, the Winter in the other hand offers cleaner bass, much clinical and precise bass resolution and much faster, nimble bass response especially within the mid to upper bass region.

In terms of midrange, the RS One shares the same midrange emphasis, the Japanese is a bit more aggressive, a tad shouty sometimes, as if it was the unrefined version of Winter. Advantage over the Winter which has a much more fluidity sort of smoothness or lushness within the midrange and much natural timbrally with just enough colouration. Plus, shouty vocals are nowhere to be found unlike the RS One. Yet, seemingly the Winter have a bit more laid-back presentation, a tad distant, which probably due to the fact that the Winter is evidently has a larger, much spacious sounstaging. Meanwhile, the RS One is a significantly more intimate and cramped in soundstaging.

Speaking of treble and technical aspect, both IEMs had the fair share of sibilance between them with the Winter is a bit more sharper, meanwhile the RS One is sort of grainy. There’s much more liveliness and presence in the treble of RS One which I personally like without it causing any fatigueness, at least after more than an hour listening. Winter in the other hand has a much airy treble which compliments the spacious soundstage, but at the same time Winter has a much dryer treble, sounded a tad thinner. Speaking of timbre, both IEM has somewhat weird treble timbre with the Winter sounded much thinner and the RS One is slightly more metallic. Other technical parts which I have not mentioned, simply said almost all are better on Winter compared to the RS One, but even so the RS One excels slightly better, wider in terms of dynamic range.


Hence, for whom this IEM truly is?
Let’s start off with that question and as far that I could tell, BQEYZ Winter is a set for someone who prefers a milder version of the Harman Curve, a tuning between analytical sounding in-ear whilst still keeping the harmony balance between the rest of the frequencies. It is also a really good set for those who can take advantage for its remarkble midrange performance. I could find no frequency inbalance, by means one frequency is overpowering or purposely emphasized to the other despite the small emphasis within the higher frequencies. It had a fair share of balanced technicalities as well, and I am certainly impressed that BQEYZ kept it’s promise that the Winter is capable of delivering wide spacious soundstage and commendable seperation.


Conclusion
Overall to wrap it up, the Winter performed rather underwhelming at least in terms of SQ alone, there’s nothing wrong with the tuning as far as I’m concerned, probably due to the excecution that’s still isn’t quite right. Given the fact, that it retails for $239 and at the price point of above $150-200. Stricter measures had to be made to justify the asking price and for me, the Winter was just too overpriced for how it performs and to justify the poor quality of the polyarylate single-dynamic. There are more option that might serve better and a more complete sounding IEMs within the same price range or cheaper compared to the Winter. Based on my experience having them for a week, I couldn’t find much joy everytime I put the Winter on to try and eventually became a hard thing for me to love. Although, I tried to tune into the songs that I usually comforts me the Winter somehow kills the emotion that the music was trying to express.

Either way, I would love to say thank you very much again to BQEYZ and AudioMonsta for the gifted chance to test the BQEYZ Winter and also to everyone that has spent your precious time to enjoy my write-up, till next time.



Test Tracks
Here are my personal curated playlist that I’ve used throughout the whole testing period;
(Click via the names to check out the songs)

Anesthetize by Porcupine Tree
Aquatic Mouth Dance by Red Hot Chilli Peppers
bad guy by Billie Eilish
Black Summer by Red Hot Chilli Peppers
Drum Improvisation by Jim Keltner
Explorations in Space and Time by Jamey Haddad, Lenny White and Mark Sherman
Hollow (16-bit Remix) by Björk ft 16-bit
Hunter by Björk
Keroncong Hybrid Untuk Bidadari by Pot Amir
Mad About You (Live at Koningin Elisabethzaal) by Hooverphonic
Masih by Pot Amir
Nightingale (Alternate Ver. Allaire Session) by Norah Jones
Painter’s Song (Alternate Ver. Allaire Session) by Norah Jones
Psychosocial by Slipknot
Sex and Candy by Marcy Playground
Timbres by Yosi Horikawa
Whiskey Lullaby (ft Allison Krauss) by Brad Paisley
White Braids and Yellow Pillows by Red Hot Chilli Peppers

Attachments

  • LRM_20230103_012351.jpg
    LRM_20230103_012351.jpg
    1.1 MB · Views: 0
  • LRM_20230103_152043.jpg
    LRM_20230103_152043.jpg
    1.3 MB · Views: 0
  • LRM_20230103_153714.jpg
    LRM_20230103_153714.jpg
    1.6 MB · Views: 0
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Brionced and NeonHD
NeonHD
NeonHD
Thanks for this honest review, I own their Spring2 and the treble on there was also too harsh and shrill for me, despite some reviews saying otherwise. Seems like BQEYZ's treble tuning is not my cup of tea.
n0varay
n0varay
@NeonHD thanks for the compliment, I've done my utmost. Seems like we're on the same boat, I love myself an engaging, lively, smooth treble tuning but not this one unfortunately. To me, although it was my first from BQEYZ, but their treble tuning this time was quite bland and harsh.
  • Like
Reactions: NeonHD

n0varay

New Head-Fier
TRI iOne - Shall you be the "One"?
Pros: -
- Well-balanced bass response that's tactile, punchy and well-defined.
- Excellent sub-bass extension and texture capable of reaching almost the lowest threshold effortlessly clean.
- Pristine midrange, with excellent clarity has great organic timbre as well.
- Superb vocal reproduction, detailed, smooth and well-articulated.
- Crisp, mildly airy, with a well-extended, detailed treble response
- Treble sparkle and brilliance is good, smooth and sibilance is not accentuated
- Snares, drum crashes, hi-hats, and etc sounded accurately natural, organic.
- Jammed pack with accessories.
Cons: -
- Bassheads probably find bass response lacking in quantity.
- Recessed midrange, noticeably less pronounced than other frequencies.
- Male vocals lacks in weight, has a leaner profile
- Treble can be a tad silvery, has an edgy sound to it, becomes more prominent when given poor source.
- Slight treble smearing especially in tracks that has quick transients, transitions between elements.
- Fitting and comfort issues especially for prolonged listening sessions
LRM_20220930_173440.jpg

Disclaimer
  • This is my own personal unit that I've acquired from recent Mid-Autumn Festival giveaway, courtesy of KBEAR and TRI. That's being said, I'm free from any bias or influence from their side despite being given the trust and opportunity to review.
  • All opinions and thoughts are solely based on my experience and knowledge about audio and my sound preference.
  • I haven't had much experience with in-ear around this price bracket. Hence, I can't give a comparison between it's similar counterparts.
  • This review is done using only the accessories provided within the box itself.

Introduction
TRI Audio is a premium subsidiary brand of KBEAR, originated from China and manufactured by Shenzhen Lingyin Technology Co. Ltd, which also appearently produces in-ear monitors for the parent company, KBEAR.

TRI is a well-known and reputable brand among the audiophile circle, the I3 tribrid flagship that was an instant success for the brand, which was soon continued with the more refined I3 Pro. TRI have also released quite some terrific number of gears laying in-store such as the TRI × HBB KAI which was a collaboration project between TRI and Bad Guy Good Audio Review (BGGAR), TRI Starshine, TRI Starsea and plenty more.

In this review, we’ll be looking straight into the TRI iOne. The latest addition into the flagship i-Series line-up. With a configuration consisting of a single-dynamic driver and will be priced below the $300 price bracket.

The iOne is set to have a shout on some similar single-dynamic in-ears that has been out in the market for quite awhile now, such as the Tanchjim Oxygen, DUNU Falcon Pro, Thieaudio Elixir and many more. Hence, let’s get into the review!


Specifications
  • Driver : 10mm Carbon PET diaphragm with external N52 NdFeB Magnet Circuit Design.
  • Impedance : 24±2 Ohms
  • Sensitivity : 109±2dB (no units provided)
  • Frequency Response : 20Hz-20kHz
  • Cable : TRI Wolfram 3.5mm plug, 2-pin (0.78mm) 4 core OFC shielding pure silver cable

LRM_20220930_151347 (1).jpg

LRM_20221009_020608.jpg


Packaging
The iOne came in a rather large, thick flip box with a cardboard lid inside that features various professional on-stage equipments and nature. To me, it hints that this in-ear is probably marketed for professionals such as on-stage performers, audio engineers and producers. Plus, TRI's aims in delivering sound that's natural as possible with the brand new iOne.


LRM_20221009_015455.jpg

As we explore further, the product was beautifully presented with a tidy layout of accessories and the in-ear itself, snuggly fit in a cut-out foam like chicks cuddling in their nest during the cold weather.


LRM_20220930_155301 (1).jpg

In terms of accessories, you'll receive a simple leatherette case and a soft, nicely padded mesh bag for your in-ear. A cleaning cloth and a small brush is also included inside, which certainly handy as the glass finish are absolute magnets for fingerprints and dusts.


LRM_20221014_014712 (1).jpg

Next, you'll receive two sets of eartips. Which are the Balanced eartips and also the recently released Clarion eartips. To make things short, the balanced eartips elevates low-end and taming treble with it's narrower bore, albeit it made the iOne felt slightly enclosed and loses it's treble extension slightly. Meanwhile, the Clarion is the opposite with it's wide bore, detail retrieval and spatial capabilities improves quite noticeably.


LRM_20220930_160810 (1).jpg


Stock cable for the iOne is one of TRI’s higher-end model cable, which is the TRI Wolfram. The Wolfram is available in two different terminations which are the standard 3.5mm single-ended and a 4.4mm Pentacon Balanced. Each connectors including the Y-splitter, are made out of anodized aviation grade aluminium and angular shaped for further comfort.

The Wolfram is a remarkable cable, in my humble opinion. It’s main build features 4 cores of pure silver cable, which each core are made out of 204 strands of high-purity silver wires as main conductors. Moreover, the Wolfram utilizes 32 strands of Oxygen Free Copper (OFC) wires that serves as a shielding outer layer for each silver core.

As for the finishing touch, each of the cores are protected under a thick, heavy duty textile and neatly braided in a helix style braiding which certainly matching the aesthetics. Albeit, I wish the cable was much softer and lighter for better comfort, especially if you’re thinking about using it outdoors.


LRM_20221004_223129 (1).jpg

LRM_20221004_222715.jpg

Build/Comfort
What strikes me immediately is the weight and size of the iOne. They're quite hefty and large for a single-dynamic, the aluminium alloy built is complemented with a precise machining and smooth finish. The 2-pin connections are sturdy and firm. The iOne came in two colour options, which are Silver and the other variant is Black as on my set.
When speaking about ergonomics, they're quite comfy but could be the opposite after long usage, notably around the cymba conchae. Fundamentally, the outward part that rests on the cymba is supporting the sheer weight of the iOne.
To add more, the iOne has a rather short and large 6mm in diameter nozzles. Because of it, I found the fitting to be quite difficult, as I had to use the largest eartip size available to get proper seal. Thankfully, the Clarion suits perfectly for me regarding the fitting, plus it sounded the best to my ears.

Isolation
Quite average, due to it has multiple vent holes on each sides or as TRI refer it as “Dual Rear Chamber Asymmetric Three-hole Design”, which increases the uniformity of airflow in and out the chamber. Hence, noises from outside are a tad audible even with perfect seal. Even so, these should have zero problem to be worn outdoors and public as long as the optimum fitting and seal is achieved.


LRM_20221009_152652 (3).jpg


Scalability/Source
I tested the iOne through multiple platforms such as;
  • Spotify + Local files (FLAC, WAV, DSD) > SMSL Sanskrit 10th MKII > Aune X7s
  • Letshuoer DT02 DAC/AMP dongle
  • Notebook
  • Smartphones
The iOne is scales very well with various equipments, even low-powered devices should have no problem driving these optimally. For example, on mobile setup the Letshuoer DT02 dongle which has 1Vrms@32Ohms (3.5mm) only requires me to crank up my phone volume up to 2-4 times on the volume rocker (depends on which track is playing).
Although, when plugging into much powerful sources, the iOne has a marginally slight increase in the higher frequencies. As test goes, treble became slightly crisper and has more shimmer almost like there's a silvery edge sound to it. Either way, keeping the iOne hooked up into a low-powered device is the way to go.


received_651620896542371.jpeg

Diagram 1: Reference graph of the iOne, courtesy of KBEAR

Sound Quality

Low Frequencies (Bass)

Starting off with bass, the iOne has a well-balanced, very clean and well-executed bass response. By referring closely to the reference graph, it showed the iOne has quite a steep V-shaped curve (refer Diagram 1). To my surprise, from what I’ve critically listened for the past several weeks (30+ total listening hours approx), that doesn’t seem to be the case here.

It actually has a much leaner bass impact than what I anticipated with a usual V-shaped tuning. In softer, laid-back jazz like Nightingale (Alternate Version - The Allaire Session) by Norah Jones. As the mallet of the bass drum hits, every kick sounded like an airy thump, rather than a low boomy sound.

Even so, it does not shy to provide a solid thump and meaty bass when being called upon. The iOne has a more pronounced upper-bass energy than it’s mid-bass, impressively provides a nimble/tactile punchy bass without causing any bleeding into the lower midrange. It’s lower-end is well-defined, has a fair amount of texture rendering and remarkably capable of reaching almost the lowest threshold.

As we dive “deeper”, sub-bass extension and decay is excellent. Rumbles and reverberations effect, deep sub-bass that goes as deep as 30Hz in Hollow (16-bit Remix) by Björk ft 16-bit and tactile, snappy bass impact in Hunter by Björk, recreated remarkably well with flying colours.

Meanwhile, in Anesthetize by Porcupine Tree, sumptuous electric guitars sound are easily distinguished, deep sub-bass provides satisfying grunt. Drum hits are remarkably coherent, tactile and chesty with fair amount of weight and depth. Thick, energetic, satisfying bass renditions in Aquatic Mouth Dance by Red Hot Chilli Peppers brilliantly presented with good energy and tone definitions between basses.

Hence, apart from the bass resolution which was rather unexceptional, the iOne has an overall solid performing bass. Thus, in my opinion the iOne is oriented for those who adores low-end quality over quantity.

Middle Frequencies (Midrange)

Next, as for midrange I absolutely adore mid-centric with forward vocal presentation in-ears. The iOne in the other hand, has a rather recessed overall presentation. Yet, the mids on iOne were pristine, engagingly euphonic, modestly warm-tilted midrange.

I chose Mad About You (Live at Koningin Elisabethzaal) by Hooverphonic and Whiskey Lullaby (ft Allison Krauss) by Brad Paisley to test vocal reproduction capabilities. Easy to say, I’m impressed by the cleanliness, clarity and realism that has been brought in terms of vocal presence, in both male and female voices. Both are well-articulated with remarkable clarity that exposes natural vocal texture grain, despite leaner profile, less weighty for male voices by just a small fair bit.

As we continue, I tested the iOne with Timbres by Yosi Horikawa and Sabrosalsa by Sergio Lara for timbre and separation. Various instruments and percussions are portrayed brilliantly, neatly separated, guitar plucks has nice fluidity with good layering even on busier part of the tracks with impressive timbral quality.

High Frequencies (Treble)

Higher frequencies in the iOne is no slouch either. It’s crisp, detailed, mildly airy and well-extended. Treble sparkle and brilliance is fairly enjoyable, has a pleasant shimmer, and inoffensive. Plus, sibilance was not accentuated for most of my listening sessions. Sound produced by cymbals, hi-hats, crashes and etc were also sounded pleasingly natural and organic.

Albiet, in all honesty there are some negatives that I simply can’t ignore, such as a slight smearing when given tracks that has quick transients between a single/more elements such as Psychosocial by Slipknot and Ignorance by Paramore. Which can be heard at the part of the song between drum crashes being hit at a fast tempo.

Furthermore, the treble in the iOne sounds a bit silvery, which means it has a small amount of sharp treble edge yet still nowhere close to being harsh nor piercing, this might be due to the peak at 5kHz. Thus, it does not shy to reveal harsh details when feeded with poor recorded tracks which will results into ear fatigue during prolonged listening.

Technicalities

In my opinion, detail retrieval, dynamic range and spatial imaging are the strong technicalities of the iOne. Listening to Drum Improvisation by Jim Keltner, each of his drum strikes on the toms, cymbals, snares, and even bits of microdetails in the background are audibly clear with great imaging and separation. Resolution and layering in the iOne I’d say quite modest. Meanwhile, soundstaging were quite spacious and certainly have good width than depth.

The album Explorations in Space and Time by Jamey Haddad, Lenny White and Mark Sherman is a perfect example to test soundstaging capabilities given that this binaural recording has plenty of elements presented in the song. Especially in War and Rhythm, like handheld chimes that constantly moving from one side to another, bassy almost like thunderous hits of drums and cymbals and plenty more instruments which really test the performance of the iOne.

Lastly, dynamic range is excellent. For this, I used an WAV audio sample (in the video’s description box) from ABYSS Headphones where they play a sound of a drum and a bell. The drum will always play at a constant volume, while the bell will gradually become quieter. Out of 7 counts, the iOne managed to score 6, hence I can safely say that the iOne has a wide dynamic range.

LRM_20221002_161241.jpg


Conclusion
To wrap it up, I genuinely think that the new i-Series flagship, the iOne is a well-tuned IEM. It’s balanced tuning with technicalities that’s well above my personal expectations, makes it versatile piece of audio equipment for critical listening, while still being enjoyable at the same time.

Plus, complemented by it’s sheer immaculate built quality and aesthetics, the iOne is definitely one worthy addition into the i-Series line-up. Whether it’ll gain popularity as with their previous I3 and I3 Pro, only time will tell. Considering the Chi-Fi market is currently tilted in the sub-$150 and below.

I would love to thank both KBEAR and TRI for a wonderful experience with the iOne. Hence, this IEM gets my recommendation for those who wanted to try something that is still enjoyable without being overdone as in a typical V-shaped IEM and also for bassheads who want to pump their heart’s content with quality bass while still not in short of little nuances and microdetails in their music.

To make purchases, head to KeepHifi via this link! (not affiliated)
https://keephifi.com/products/tri-ione

You could also make purchases at KBEAR's official AliExpress store via this link (not affiliated)
https://a.aliexpress.com/_mspBxZ2
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Carpet and yaps66
Back
Top