General Information

"The ultimate boutique experience.

The Plunge Audio Signature Series gives you access to technology, material, and innovations that no other model can provide. You’ll have unlimited access to the Plunge Audio team to create the most unique, tailored pair of IEMs, down to your every specification and requirement.

Not for the fair of heart, this process is intense and in depth – no sonic stone will be left unturned."

Screenshot_20210309-145957_Instagram.jpg

Latest reviews

justsomesonyfan

Headphoneus Supremus
Plunge Audio Signature Ciem review: Jack of all trades, master of all.
Pros: -Massive Balanced soundstage which enters the realm of full sized
-Sublime balanced sound which highlights every frequency range naturally
-Gobs of details and resolution
-Realistic timbre
-Incredibly musical sound
-Perfect custom fit comfort
-Aesthetically pleasing
-Reacts well to cable rolling
-Option to add dual BA to brighten sound
-Full African Blackwood shell for better resonance
Cons: -Pricey (but you get what you paid for)
Small edit: personal reccomendation of mine would be to go for the 2ba option to boost highs, in my opinion the dark sound won't be for everyone but a dual ba can easily fix that tuning and turn it upside down.

First disclaimer: the plunge iems require a quality cable to sound at their best, a bad cable will definitely hinder this iem's quality, it's a make or break matter imo.
For this review i'll use the cema tianwaitian cable.

Second disclaimer: I'm very bad with professional iem terms and think that a lot of them are too vague and too subjective anyways, thus my review might not be very clear for everyone, feel free to ask questions in the comments below.

Before we get started quick heads up: this iem has both a 6mm DD and 14.3mm planar running full range crossoverless. You may proceed reading.

Unlike other reviews, I'll put the introduction at the very end to those who are interested in me and plunge and the whole process of making this frankenstein iem.

Lets get to the meat of this:

Plunge Audio's Signature Planar Magnetic Dynamic Driver Hybrid Wood Vented Custom iem Review: Jack of all trades, master of all.



Packaging
: Very simple, comes with a pouch which has stickers and cleaning tools, and a plastic retainer with the name and phone of the owner on it which holds the iems and cable inside.
20210309_150729.jpg

For obvious nodoxx reasons, I've censored my name and number.



Comfort: Look at this, does it look comfy?
20210223_172351.jpg

If your answer is negative then I hate to break it to ya but these are sublime, lightweight and perfect custom fit, not much to say!

The iems are made of African Blackwood that has been precisely carved and sandpapered into the custom shape, then has been covered in 3 layers of stabilising materials and wax for the wood to last long and enter the ear smoothly.

Onto the sound-
20210309_144102.jpg

Bass: I want to call it a basshead iem, but I can't, I really really want to tho. The bass is clearly emphasized, there's a small subbass boost, but it does not do it in a way which takes away from the mids or highs, at all.

I've heard a few iems in the past and it seems that there are 2 main types of bass- subwoofer type, monitor type. most of the iems i've heard were more monitor like, solaris se/og, ier m9, obravo cupid
then there were those who went for the woofer route, xba n3, ier z1r. ier z1r especially, I think most people that listen to it claim it's the best iem bass or atleast put it very highly.


While I appreciate both types, my personal preference leans more towards the woofer type, and while ier z1r did it well, there was a lack of finesse to it, to me it could've been tighter, i also found it's decay to be too slow.

This is where plunge comes in with a 70/30 bass, 70% woofer 30% monitor, or rather.. lets go even deeper into the woofer/monitor analogy, 4 types, loose woofer, tight woofer, loose monitor, tight monitor- if ier z1r is loose woofer, then the plunge is a tight woofer.

The plungies were made by Simon Fisk, a doublebass jazz player, and yet they absolutely excel at hiphop and electronics.. That should give a perspective on how much I appreciate the bass on this pair.

It cannot do wrong unless you're looking for some serious monster basshead iem which is all bass nothing else.

I'll also put the other iems in the analogy so if you own any of the pairs you'll be able to get a better image of the plunge bass.

Loose woofer- ier z1r
Tight woofer- plunge, xba n3
Loose monitor- ier m9, solaris og
Tight monitor- solaris SE

If I were to put the highlights of the bass in terms- highly textured, punchy, addictive, tight, big. this is a bass you will definitely feel when listening to music, and it will sway your attention if the track calls for it.
20210309_144039.jpg

midrange: Same story when it comes to some of the terms, texture, addictive, big.

All of those still stay along for the mids.

I cannot call these mids thin at all, they're definitely on the thicker side.

The mids is where the planar takes over and yells "you wanted detail and speed, here you go"

Plunge Audio made me realize how outdated the BA drivers are when it comes to the midrange, now now, I haven't heard all the ba iems out there, and I'm sure some can definitely come close to the plungies, but not quite.

For midrange, the jump from ba to planar to me is the equivelant of the bass going from ba to a DD- you can try to imitate a dd with a bunch of BA drivers but it'll never be one.

One word stands out to me for planar mids- uncompressed: Think going from 128kbps to flac, going from phone output to a proper dap/dacamp.

When it comes to vocals both female and male vocals stand out, however I'd give the upper hand to the male vocals on this pair. voices are lush, well presented, prominent and pronounced, and definitely take the lead when they're present.

I definitely want to write something along the lines of: "oh instruments are a highlight on this pair" but I can't.

I can't because every part of this iem is a highlight, you don't get one without the other.

Midrange just like the bass is very felt, I don't really know how to explain this part. but me and simon tried going for wood to hopefully get exactly that effect, with as much resonance as possible. similar to a bone conduction, but not quite.

I will say that the wood with full contact custom iem is a success and adds to every frequency a sense of feeling it, if that makes any sense.
20210309_144011.jpg

Highs: Dark, but present- the treble is all there, atleast the mid and high treble, when it comes to 5khz - 9khz it has a small recession when compared to the pinna gain but nothing that's a deal breaker.

The treble, it won't be upfront, nor will it be overshadowed.

I don't feel as if it's lacking, however- If one wants more treble adding a dual BA tweeter is always a possibility to get a brighter iem.

Update- I've sent the customs to get an upgrade, another 10mm planar driver, utilised to boost the high frequencies, the iem is no longer dark, is more V shaped now however retains everything in the review, only that now treble pops better to my liking :)




Now to the best part! What? You didn't think it could get better? well, let me introduce you to the

soundstage, seperation, presentation, and imaging:

THE highlight of the iem is how absurdly big it sounds, it's practically a headphone at this point.

the iems sound huge, huge and spacious.

hearing every tiny detail is an absolute piece of cake, everything is there and you'll be able to tell, but you won't get a monitorish/anemic/clinical sound at all.

Easily the most musical iem and audio product i've heard, ever.

The staging is 3d, very 3d, I wouldn't say it's the most balanced soundstage right now, but that's not because height and depth lack, rather because the width is just huge. it's genuinely bigger than my mdr 1am2, that's impressive man!

Putting it on paper, the plunge's width ends sound about 2-2.5 inches or 5-6cm far from each ear.

On top of that- the plunge custom is the first time i've heard sound coming from BEHIND my head.

The presentation is similar to the ier z1r on crack cocaine, sounds like the music surrounds you and plays as it wishes where ever it wishes, the band surrounds your head with instruments and music, however i won't go and exaggerate that it's just like being in the middle of a concert, there's a huge difference and personally i never liked those extremely over the top explanations for soundstage: "like being in a stadium" or "like being in a band rehearsal".

After all it's just an iem.. but not just an iem.

Compared to other iems it is definitely a few notches above in soundstage and everything that has to do with presentation.

Plunge breaks the walls (literally) of the soundstage by venting the back, and that makes all the difference, plug the vent and you get a normal iem that still outdoes the other iems i've tried, open the vent and the sound goes everywhere around your head.



Comparisons:

Small disclaimer: None of these iems can do what the plunge does and I genuinely have a hard time truly believing someone would prefer them over the plunge if s/he were to hear the plunge.

However there is a big price gap of almost double, priced at 4k CAD, or around 3k usd.

From memory ier z1r: The ier z1r's bass is looser, decay is slower, the plunge expands the soundstage in every axis more, mids are far thinner and less detailed, sound compressed, presentation is all around smaller, treble is much brighter, much more pronounced.

The ier z1r weigh much more and are far less comfortable.


Solaris SE/OG: This is the only iem I can see someone preferring over the plunge purely for the unique presentation, to me it always felt like when it comes to hearing the solaris everything was laid infront of me for me to gaze upon.

So solaris is definitely more linear and forward.

If we were to put them in over the top explanations, solaris is "being in middle to front row" while the plunge is "being with the band".

Other than that the solaris' bass is tighter but less textured, much less felt, mids sound more compressed, and less detailed, details feel much more pinpoint and smaller, highs are same as the mids.


Ier m9: No comparison. I've heard the ier m9 was the imaging king, and while it had great imaging, it has nothing on this.

I genuinely don't think m9 does anything better than the plungies.




Conclusion: If you want a seriously new experience in audio and want a unique custom all arounder iem that truly gets everything highlighted naturally without giving away balance, plunge audio is your go to.



Introduction: Who am I? A nobody really, just another person who likes audio a lot, and gives out his honest thoughts.

I've contacted Plunge Audio after hearing about it being an unknown obscure company, went to their site, saw their models, and got interested.

Got a pair of their highest model, contacted simon later on using facebook and we slowly but surely built a strong friendship on ideas and innovation.

When I first asked Simon about planars and mmcx he was very interested, we had a lot of ideas about iems it's development, at first we thought about a dd/planar/est combo, but the ests did not go well with the planar, trust me i've heard it.

Anyways, I don't remember if Simon had experience with planars before or not when it comes to iems, i can day that he absolutely found an understanding of the driver's sound and showed me just how well a planar can sound.

Simon himself in my honest opinion is a great person, he went very long lengths for me to be a pleased customer, he's very open minded, very spiritual and kind hearted at his core.

You can tell he does it for his passion and the experience of people and not for money, He puts heart into it.

I'd also reccomend checking out his music, he put on some very interesting albums out there.

Moving on with progress, making the iem itself took around a month or two I think at best? but figuring the iem, figuring what really works (since it was the first ever planar/dd full range crossoverless iem to come from plunge) I think it took about 6-8 months, including me getting 3 demos to hear the direction the iem is moving in and giving my thoughts on it.

Attachments

  • 20210309_144129.jpg
    20210309_144129.jpg
    2.4 MB · Views: 0
Last edited:
justsomesonyfan
justsomesonyfan
@MuhVNYP I'll answer your questions in order.

- No, the new plunge iems are not better in technicalities, but they come close, I do prefer the new model's tuning for every day listening because it works better on lower volumes, while the signatures work best in high volumes.

- I got another iem from them because I love them as a company and am always interested to hear what they have in store, along with this IEM having different purpose, having different drivers, and being a universal model.

- Yes, it is my best iem, but the upcoming 1dd 4ba might be a combination of the 4ba and the signatures, in theory there's a possibility, so I'll update on that.
justsomesonyfan
justsomesonyfan
@MuhVNYP

- Recent totl? not really, I can compare it to the mest, the ier z1r, and the solaris 2020, but only from memory, and I would take the signatures over all of them (same goes for the 4ba).

The only iem that can be of any interest is the ier z1r, it may sound cleaner because of the leaner, thinner, tuning which has far less lower mids.

- Yes and no: While I'm sure it is definitely possible, Plunge audio has gone universal only (and this is for the best) however you can always message them on social media about being interested, and see where they'll go with you, I'm sure they'll love working with you on the idea you have in mind, do know that it can be a long process.

- There's no actual limit to the price, but since plunge audio has gone universal their prices have went down dramatically, so I do not think you'll have a reason to shoot for paying high prices.
For example the 4ba is 800 CAD but I'd take it over the solaris 2020 anyday.
M
MuhVNYP
Hey, thanks so much for the detailed answer n sorry for not replied to it earlier.

Comments

SixthFall

500+ Head-Fier
Nice pair! I have a set of producers from like 2017. Still love them, they I’m pretty sure, are the first iems that he signed lol.

I really hope more people in head fi hear about plunge. Simon is an awesome dude, and is constantly pushing new tech.
 

justsomesonyfan

Headphoneus Supremus
Nice pair! I have a set of producers from like 2017. Still love them, they I’m pretty sure, are the first iems that he signed lol.

I really hope more people in head fi hear about plunge. Simon is an awesome dude, and is constantly pushing new tech.
yeah he is!! I'll be dishing out 3 new reviews soon
 

justsomesonyfan

Headphoneus Supremus
Nice, how do they compare soundwise to the signatures?
two completely different beasts, they could be compared to the ier m9 vs ier z1r, 4ba being the m9, z1r being signature, 4ba has a great huge iem sound, pinpoint imaging, more of a traditional iem sound presentation, signatures are bassier, much bigger sounding, more comparable to earbuds/headphones.

both have incredible timbres, 4ba doesn't sound like ba, soon there'll be a 4ba 1dd model too. 4ba is more linear, signature is more V shaped however each iem utilises it's drivers in the best way possible, if the signatures had the 4ba's tuning they'd feel muddy and overly mid centric, on the other hand if the 4ba had the signature tuning they'd feel incredibly hollow.

as for now simon is working on a universal version of my customs, but there are no guarantees it'll be the same, however the 4ba is an EASY recc, not only is it priced very well, the comfort and sound are just on the highest level from what i've heard.
 

Altes

100+ Head-Fier
more of a traditional iem sound presentation
what do you mean by traditional iem sound presentation, and how is the signature different?
4ba doesn't sound like ba, soon there'll be a 4ba 1dd model too.
do you know why he is adding a new version with DD if the 4BA has already overcome sounding like BA? What new aspect of sound is the new DD intended to bring?
 

justsomesonyfan

Headphoneus Supremus
what do you mean by traditional iem sound presentation, and how is the signature different?

do you know why he is adding a new version with DD if the 4BA has already overcome sounding like BA? What new aspect of sound is the new DD intended to bring?
1. By traditional iem I mean a more pinpoint and closed presentation, for example, it you've heard one of the following- ier m9, cfa solaris, UM mest.
If we were to compare them to something like the ier z1r for example, putting tonality aside, the ier z1r's presentation will be far bigger, more diffused, and more dynamic, like going from a closed back headphone to open back. (the only exception is the solaris that produces a staging similar to the ier z1r's, but with a closed back presentation)

2. While the 4ba iem has a very dynamic like sound, it does not benefit much from having a vented back, it's purpose is different, pinpoint accurate monitoring sound, the 4ba is meant for musicians, while the 1dd 4ba is for audiophiles.

I've got my hands on a pair of the 1dd 4ba and all of the differences you can read above about the closed back iems vs open back apply here, while the tonality changes to be bassier aswell.

I will mention, unlike most iems, the added DD is full range, and not just a subwoofer.
 

Altes

100+ Head-Fier
Thanks so much for this info. I'm surprised since I've been reading claims that the 4BA version has unmatched soundstage, surpassing all other IEMs. Yet in comparison to the signature, the 4BA version sounds more closed.
I've got my hands on a pair of the 1dd 4ba and all of the differences you can read above about the closed back iems vs open back apply here, while the tonality changes to be bassier aswell.
By the "closed back vs open back" reference, could you clarify if you meant the 1DD 4BA version is like the 4BA version, or like the Signature version?

From your initial review, I felt that you preferred the Signature, followed by the Solaris, the Z1R, and lastly the M9. Now that you have the 2 new universals, where would they land on this list?
 

justsomesonyfan

Headphoneus Supremus
Thanks so much for this info. I'm surprised since I've been reading claims that the 4BA version has unmatched soundstage, surpassing all other IEMs. Yet in comparison to the signature, the 4BA version sounds more closed.

By the "closed back vs open back" reference, could you clarify if you meant the 1DD 4BA version is like the 4BA version, or like the Signature version?

From your initial review, I felt that you preferred the Signature, followed by the Solaris, the Z1R, and lastly the M9. Now that you have the 2 new universals, where would they land on this list?
1. the 4BA does have incredible staging compared to other iems I've tried, it's atleast on solaris level for me.

Staging is different than presentation to me, staging is merely the XYZ, depth height and width, I'd say the 4ba is about 5cm away from each ear in width, which is the same as the solaris and ier z1r for me, the signatures go a bit further on a rough estimate of around 7cm give or take.

2. the 1dd 4ba is a hybrid take on the sounds of the 4ba and the signatures, and I'd put it somewhere in the middle, but leaning more towards the open sound.

3. My preference list is based on all aspects, and not just SQ, therefore I'll do a few lists for you to have all perspectives.

Complete package (accessories and value included): 4ba > 1dd 4ba > ier m9 > cfa solaris/mest > signatures

Comfort: signatures/4ba/1dd 4ba > mest/solaris >>> ier z1r/m9 (each had their problems, m9 didn't fit my ear well and would pressure my ears, the z1r was too heavy, and while I had great fit with it, pain would soon follow after 30-60 minutes)

Overall SQ: signatures >> ier z1r/1dd 4ba > 4ba >= solaris > mest > ier m9

Tonality: 4BA > signatures > Solaris/1dd 4ba/mest > ier z1r > ier m9

Isolation + Sound leakage: 4BA (damn near close to triple flange etymotics) > ier m9 > solaris/mest > ier z1r > 1dd 4ba > signatures

Staging: Signatures > ier z1r/1dd 4ba >= solaris/4ba >>> mest/m9

Detail retrieval: Honestly, they're all on an extremely similar level, we're talking TOTL level here, atleast for my music genres, metal (mainly), hiphop, jazz, electronic, it's very hard to notice new details between the pairs.

Imaging: (this is basically which one sounds more open and which's more closed, there's no better here.)

Closed: ier m9 > mest > solaris = 4ba > 1dd 4ba > z1r >> signatures

Pinpoint accuracy (open iems suffer here more, as their dynamics are huge.): 4ba/m9 >= mest > solaris > ier z1r > signatures

Diffuse/Dynamics: signatures > ier z1r/1dd 4ba > solaris/4ba > mest > ier m9

Let me know if I missed a point or if you have any more questions! :) I will mention that if you can find a solaris 2020 on the used market, it's a great alternative, it looks gorgeous irl, however, even when they are similar on SQ level, the 4ba offers isolation and comfort that the solaris cannot wish to match.
 

Altes

100+ Head-Fier
wow thanks. greatly appreciate this. The only things are probably which ones you use the stock cable with, and type of eartips? clean/neutral source, warm source, etc.? Oh, and maybe ranking for most musical and your personal enjoyment/preference?

Aside from that, I'm guessing you already know the price for the 1DD 4BA since you could measure its value? :xf_eek:
 
Last edited:
Back
Top