qdc Anole V14 Universal IEM

Full disclaimer up front: This is my first plunge into TOTL IEMs, so I don't have an extensive amount of experience with other TOTL options to compare.

I have owned my V14 for a bit less than a year now, and I have been using it basically daily for long periods of time (6+ hours at a time). At this point, I feel confident in my opinion on this IEM.

The QDC V14 is sonically awesome. I have not heard this IEM choke on anything I have played through it. EDM, Prog metal, Thrash, Orchestral pieces, Swing Jazz, and whatever else I fancy poses no technical issues for the V14. Every instrument is played back clearly and distinct from other similar instruments, so the sound image is exceedingly precise. Tracks involving 3 electric guitars and a violin playing simultaneously have played havoc on lower budget audio gear I have used, and the V14 handles these songs flawlessly. This IEM represents the technical capabilities of the TOTL without disappointment for me.

The above is the reason why I put up with the many problems the V14 comes with.

First is comfort. When I was researching what I wanted to choose as my entry into the TOTL world, I was assured that the V14 was quite comfortable by everyone who reviewed it. I had the exact opposite experience. The body of the IEM has a little wing at the top that I think is supposed to interact with the antihelix of the pinna for some reason, and that wing is the reason that I will not purchase any further IEMs designed by QDC until it is fixed. On this supposedly universal IEM, that shape severely interferes with fitment on anyone who doesn't have a specific pinna shape QDC had in mind. If that wing were not there, I would have no issue with the shell; as it stands I get sharp pain in a few minutes if I don't use the custom tips I ordered to alleviate this problem out of necessity. This is a huge miss on the design side by QDC, especially since it's on the side no one will see.

Second, I had a number of minor QC issues arise on my model. The left 2 pin socket unit is slightly too loose, which lead to me nearly losing the left unit at one point. The nozzle of one of my units fell off the shell because the resin was not properly formed around it. The glue holding the wax filters in place on the nozzle failed in a few months. The IEM seems filled up with some sort of damping material that is preventing air flow through the venting hole, and this causes air pressure problems when in use (QDC claims the V14 is vented, meaning my unit is either defective or they are lying about this). I understand no company is going to be perfect with QC, but this is a shocking lack of attention given to fit and finish for this price bracket. I expect TOTL IEMs like this to be near perfect every time.

Third is the tuning. There is a bit of a harsh peak at 8.8k to my ear that adds too much sibilant bite to most tracks. It's not a big peak (I EQ'd that down about 2 dB and it's no longer a problem) so I put that down to my HRTF not favoring that. However, QDC made a strange decision with the pinna gain compensation. Instead of gently building an upward curve to somewhere near 3k, they plateau'd the curve at 2k and scooped out some of the response from 2k to 3.1k, and this causes a strange issue with guitars and female vocals where the rest of the track will sound right at head level, but the guitars and vocals will sound vertically depressed. I think this is not just an HRTF problem because Precogvision also noted this dip in the middle of the sound image, meaning others are also experiencing this. This quirk in the tuning marrs what is otherwise an outstanding presentation of sound.

While I enjoy the V14 I have arrived at, the process was not exactly what I had hoped for from a TOTL offering. I really hope this is not indicative of the industry as a whole, the prices being asked for should guarantee an excellent experience the entire way through IMO.

Preamble: As much as QDC is my equivalent of Fitear is to @riverground, the cost of whatever their latest iteration is in the Anole series is hard to stomach when the Odin is in the same range, and was the primary reason that this universe was the one where this review would not exist. These impressions have been enabled by Aussie audiophile and revolving door of high end audio gear @Damz87. Who generously accepted a multi-continent trade for his meticulously maintained V14 in exchange for a slightly scratched A8000 and a demo model M4. What initially was an attempted to free up funds in the A8000 became the opportunity to try yet another kilobuck TOTL (thanks HeadFi). I really hope the price doesn't jump up for the next iteration of their flagship as the VX was relatively high for it's time already with the V14 is eye-watering given the competition. I do wish the price was as chameleony as it's namesale, but enough of that, the V14 comes first.

I've waxed poetic and am a huge fan of the Empire and 64 Audio house sounds and for all intents and purposes you really couldn't go any further....or so I thought. In comparison to other markets in East Asian, the Chinese market has a relatively different preference for their sound. Especially when compared to the more western leaning hybrid signatures that come out of Japanese, Korean and Singaporean manufacturers. From the first time I put a QDC product in my ears, there's always been this sense of "yes, THIS is what I was looking for". Backed by years of experience with audio reproduction, QDC has an essential monopoly on the professional market. In fact I don't think I've ever seen any competitor in a Chinese music competition have anything in their ears. Unfortunately their house sound is firstly professional rather than audiophile (like 64) and secondly the uniquely Chinese sound preference and I just don't see it clicking with western audiophiles or even those who listen to western music. As such their market is limited to the East Asia area. It's horrible for my wallet, great for my ears and hard to resell (Is that a bad thing though?). I found the V14 eerily similar to the A12t, but separated by $700 benajmins in price. And I have to say that the V14 aboslutely warrants that price tag after exchanging blows. Ultimately price at no point factored in to my decisions to keep the A12t over QDC's most elegant and sophisticated chameleon to date.

Design: As always, the semi-custom shells are a perfect fit. Not as snug as my A12t mind you, but close enough that I almost forget the V14 is in my ear during long listening sessions, there's never any feeling that the fit is loose or shifting. Despite the whopping 14 driver configuration per side, the V14 is surprisingly light as well. QDC has followed up the metallic silver on the VX and the elegant purple wood on the DMagic with yet what feels like another art piece than a set of audio transducers. A classy black speckled with carbon fibre with the gold V14 logo on both sides as well as "qdc" on the antitragus. Of course this being a flagship with the highest price tag outside of the Blue Dragon meant that QDC also made it glow in the dark after being exposed to UV light (or the sun), a bit gimmicky but also much more useful than say having switches. The switches get an additional toggle from the VX, and I'd much rather opt for a slightly cheaper model without for both practical and theoretical concerns. Thought the appeal of having potentially 16 different tunings in an iem might appeal to some of you. While it is possible to get a normal 2 pin socket version of the V14, for ease and speed most of us will be the getting the standard extruded 0.75 2 pin with reverse polarity (Not an issue as covered by @jwbrent) which does make life for use prolific cable rollers so I advise spending some time to get the normal 2 pin version if you plan to try cables. V14 also comes with a brand new 12 core iteration of the stock copper/silver (6 copper, 6 silver) with the swappable termination which I found an already excellent pairing out of the box and the third entry onto my list of excellent stock cables. Of course, the stock cable comes with angled connectors and that may pose an issue with comfort for some of you. The nozzles as usually are metal with lips (EMPIRE TAKE NOTES) and the stock tips stay on quite well. V14 eagerly shows you it's a chameleon in the category of fitting in your ears, lets see how much more chameleony it can get.

Testing: QDC includes excellent stock tips out of the box, so rather than go to the Deepmounts I opted to use the stock tips in small. Some testing also resulted in a better fit for me than the Deepmounts in this case. They must be using the Gen 2 Estas in the V14 as I could discern no change in the treble regardless of low or high gain on the 4.4 of the WM1A. I ended up going to my usual combination of low gain/4.4/55 on the 1A for the V14. Switch equipped models have always been a hit or miss for me so I just went for the stock tuning with all switches off.

Bass: The V14 seems to have shifted from what I remembered as a slight midbass bias on the VX, instead opting this time for subbass bias. It holds up well in the price bracket in terms of extension, perhaps coming across much more clearly than say the warmer tuned Balmung. The bass is not a basshead tier but offers good slam to please the average audiophile. However the impact seems to have been dialed back, but this seems to be a compromise on the part of QDC to maintain a balanced signature that's also doesn't induced fatigue too quickly being a sealed design. The bass shelf is clean and there is no bleed at all into the mids, however the bass response still manages to give the lower mids excellent body.

Mids: The VX had this really weird issue that was pointed out to me by another audio friend with the mids. There's some sort of weird dip when transitioning between the lower and upper mids that is blatantly obvious. The V14 has no such issue I'm glad to report. As mentioned in the paragraph prior the lower mids have excellent body and not a hint of recession despite the bass shelf. While not the boosted " Do y'all have more of that upper mids" that I really really like, there is ample air for female mids, and similarly no recession. Both male and female vocals are extremely well balanced while offering what they need to shine. The mids have a slightly forward presentation so that regardless of the treble sparkling or bass line, the mids are always clear and present but never shouty.

Treble: V14 carries the concept of balance right into the treble as well. There's good treble energy with a slight sparkle. While dark and smooth, cymbals and high hats come across perfectly and those with 5 and 7k sensitivities can rest easy and eat their cake too. This ensures that the treble, like the bass never steals the show. I could have done with a bit more sparkle, but I really can't complain if cymbals and high hats sound right. Treble extension is fairly good, but the V14 like most other flagships opt for a focus in the lower and mid treble with a roll off in the upper treble. This also benefits those who's auditory systems no longer handle upper treble.

Conclusion: QDC's flagship line is called "Anole" or Chameleon in Chinese (Chameleons are not Anoles, which is a weird choice in english) and with the V14 I think they've done it again. A flagship that hits well in it's price bracket and by virtue of the well tuned signature is a chameleon to whatever music you put through it. Technicality wise it has solid imaging, handling the busy of my test tracks with ease backed by an equally wide and depth soundstage that makes it feel like you're sitting in the middle of a concert hall with the music flowing around you.

During my time with the V14, I noticed a striking similarity in tuning with the A12t. To the point where I was flip flopping on which to keep over the better part of a week. The deciding factor ended up being the treble presentation: I just liked A12t's use of the upper treble with a more recessed lower and mid treble much more than the lower and mid treble focused V14. Although I have to admit that I found myself reaching for the V14 more than the A12t during my time with it. The V14 although dark, was a more musical listen and also had a slight edge in the technicalities compared to the A12t and I find that enough justification for the price difference.

This time QDC chose to lean towards a darker signature that would appeal better to western audiences, they also managed to still retain the appeal of their house design, giving me those elements of the Chinese sound preference. While many of you are looking for some sort of specialist iem in the V14's price bracket, the V14 is a true all-rounder iem backed by excellent performance that I recommend giving a try especially due to the signature. This isn't your grandfather's or even your father's QDC and you never know, but you might just like it yet.

I have a trial of each Anole product of qdc, yes I am very like this series of products.

Design:
Qdc has always been excellent in the volume control of the Universal iems, and the previous models like qdc3, Neptune have a wearing experience that is almost not lost to CIEMs. The V14 has 14 drivers(on one side), which is a large number, but its volume is still controlled at an excellent level.

Configuration:
14 drivers on one side (10 BA drivers + 4 EST drivers), which is a luxry configuration. And this kind of configuration is enough to allow V14 to stand in the first echelon of similar products for a long time. In particular, the newly customized bass balanced armature makes the V14's ultra-low frequency performance better than the previous flagship balanced armature earphones, achieving a new breakthrough.

Sound:
I listened the V14 in standard mode. Although the V14 is only with BA drivers + EST drivers, the sound of it gives me the feeling that it combines the relaxed sound of dynamic drivers, the detailed image of balanced armatures, and the extension of treble of the electrostatic drivers.

Bass: V14 has a deep sub bass with excellent elasticity and will not be boomy. When performing some electronic music and rock music, the image is very clear and audible, with a lots of details.

Mids: The mids of V14 is with a high density. Its mids is very clear and natural. Especially when I listened the songs of playing an instrument, every small details are replayed very well, and I was feeling like, the scene was in my mind.

Treble: V14's trebel control is very strong. Under standard mode, I can feel that under qdc's tunning, the EST drivers output a bright but not irritating treble. It provides a air sense of sound.

Conclusion:
QDC V14 must have become the strongest iems of qdc currently(excluding qdc's luxury product: Blue Dragon). Considering the position of qdc in China's iems industry, it is not an exaggeration to call the V14 the strongest iems made in China.