Senzer S10

General Information

  • ✔ BETTER BUILT, BETTER SOUND - Say goodbye to those generic commodity ear buds and step-up to superior crafted bass earbuds for an exceptionally comfortable auditory experience
  • ✔ LESS NOISE, MORE MUSIC - Sealed in-ear construction and multiple eartips design block out external noise so you can hear more of the fine details in your music and less outside noise
  • ✔ 100% MONEY BACK GUARANTEE - Works great with iPhone iPad and Samsung. If you are not satisfied with our headphones earbuds, let us know and you will be offered a full refund or replacement
  • ✔ CUSTOM FIT, JUST FOR YOU - Enjoy full listening comfort with soft, snug earbuds that conform instantly to your ears. The humanized designed earphones, Mini and Invisible, perfect for Sleep and Sports
  • ✔ SOLID METAL HOUSING - The acoustic body is completed constructed in stainless steel and the cable is designed to be ultra-flexible and sheathed with high quality nylon sleeve for the longevity

Mini Metal Earbuds
The S10 Earphones by SENZER are designed to be as small as possible without sacrificing performance and looks. The housings are made of stainless steel and at 9.8mm in length and 6mm in diameter are not large. They have a wonderful machined finish to them and while the design is very simple and somewhat plain.

Superior Sound
Custom designed drivers pump out deep bass, soaring highs, and an ultra-clear midrange letting you hear exactly what the artist was feeling in the studio. Deep, rich sound across a wide frequency range, enhanced by a sealed acoustic design for better immersion in your music.

Lose Yourself in Your Music
Enjoy your music on the go while the noise around you is diminished - from the comfort and convenience of an in-ear earbuds.

Easily Listen to Music and Take Calls
They feature a 3-button inline remote that lets you take calls or skip a track with the press of a button. No need to reach for your device - great when you're busy.

Packaging and Accessories
Comes with 6 pairs Anti-noise soft silicone eartips in various sizes and 1 pair of memory foam eartips, blocking out external noise and providing maximum comfort. A small carry bag included.

Latest reviews

alex2750

New Head-Fier
Pros: Strong bass
Good imaging and soundstage
Comfortable
Great isolation
Volume control
Cons: Strong bass muddles lower mids/mid-bass
Sound quality gets a bit fuzzy at higher volumes
Recessed mids, especially male vocals
I recently began a quest to find the best IEM under $30. I started with the buying guide on r/headphones and haven't looked back. Chris from Senzer Audio was kind enough to reach out to me to offer me two Senzer IEMs, one of which was the S10. Despite receiving these in exchange for my review, all opinions expressed are completely mine and I always write reviews as unbiasedly and honestly as I can.

TL;DR: Incredible bass from such a small driver. V-shaped signature that features soft highs and great bass but recessed and slightly muffled mids. Great soundstage and detail and would compete with the "kings" of budget IEMs with better clarity.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

After posting pictures of the S10, B9Scrambler pointed out that these looked like the Advanced AcousticWerkes Q, a >$220 ICM (in-canal monitor). After doing a bit of research I found that they are almost carbon copies (the only major difference I saw was the shape of the rear vent) so I reached out to Chris. He confirmed that the S10s are modeled after the AAW Qs in terms of shape but might not have the same level of quality. I don't have a pair of the Qs and I doubt AAW will give me a sample to compare them to an ICM a tenth of the price of theirs so I will write about the quality of the S10s and update the review if I can test them against the Qs.

EDIT 1: Apparently, the S10 was supplied to Senzer by AAW. That explains the similarities and I've updated my final thoughts (I can't call the S10 a "Senzer remake" anymore).
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I'm a 20 year old college student who listens to music at every possible opportunity. I prefer IEMs to cans and wear them on the subway, between classes, doing school work, working out, and any other time it's socially acceptable to (as well as a few times it's not).

I listen to a bit of everything but usually prefer male vocals and strong bass. I don't know how to describe my tastes by genre so I would say somewhere in the middle of Hozier, early Maroon 5, Bruno Mars, Queen, and Mumford and Sons is my sweet spot.

I hold all of my music on my Samsung S8 and use Poweramp as my main player. Though I conduct all of my tests without EQ, this is my preferred EQ for casual listening:
Equalizer 1.png
Some of my test tracks are:
Sail - Awolnation
Somebody That I Used To Know - Pentatonix
Centipede - Knife Party
Rivers and Roads - The Head and the Heart
Hallelujah - Rufus Wainwright
Creep - Radiohead
Killer Queen - Queen
Crazy Little Thing Called Love - Queen
Hundred - The Fray
Welcome to the Black Parade - My Chemical Romance
Someone Like You - Adele
Gasoline - Halsey
Seven Nation Army - The White Stripes

At the time of posting, the Senzer S10s are $27.99 on Amazon. This places them just out of range of being a true budget IEM but are still quality drivers for under $30.

Packaging and Accessories:

Senzer made just the right first impression with their packaging. A branded black box - branded with just the Senzer name in silver, a nice touch - opened to reveal the S10s sitting in soft foam cutouts.

20170809_222956.jpg 20170809_223032.jpg

The foam under the S10s lifts to reveal a branded soft drawstring bag, a user manual, and extra eartips. The S10 comes with medium black silicone ear tips attached and also has S/L black silicone, S/M/L clear silicone, and medium foam ear tips.

20170809_223231.jpg 20170809_223453.jpg

The cord is rubber above the connector and fabric below it, just like the cord of the AAW Q. Unlike the Q, however, the S10 has in-line controls on the right side - a microphone, media control button, and volume controls. The one thing different about these controls from most others I've seen is that media control button isn't in the middle of the volume controls but under them - a setup that looks identical to the in-line controls on the AAW Nebula One, which further cements the S10 as a budget version of an AAW.

The cord feels very durable and seems like it can handle being ripped out of my ears and carried (in its bag) in my pocket. When the S10s are worn down they have some microphonics issues but those can be easily taken care of by wearing them over-ear (which I find more comfortable anyway).

The plug is straight, which I generally like less than angled plugs, but is made of metal rather than plastic and has a bit of rubber under it which provides good strain relief.

20170809_223549.jpg 20170809_223642.jpg 20170809_223651.jpg

Fit/Isolation:

I said at the beginning that these look like a knockoff of the AAW Q but I feel the need to stress again how TINY the S10s are. In fact, AAW calls the Q an ICM (in-canal monitor) rather than an IEM due to their reported size of "8.8mm in length, 6mm in diameter and weighs less than one gram per side". When I put these in my ears, I use one hand to make sure they are firmly in my ear canal - otherwise I don't get a good seal. Seriously, this is what they look like:

20170809_232735.jpg

These ICMs are about 90% eartip, which is partially due to also being about 90% nozzle.

20170809_223537.jpg

This structure may seem a bit strange at first (and it definitely did to me) but their compact size makes them one of the most comfortable things I have ever put in my ear, whether IEM or earplug. They fit snugly and, because they sit only in my ear canal, have incredible isolation. The passive isolation they give is enough to seriously muffle conversations around me and I can hear almost nothing else when I'm playing music, no matter the volume. These are also incredibly easy to wear and don't give me either fatigue or pain, even when I wear them for up to a few hours. I haven't tested it yet, but these seem like an excellent way to listen to music when you go to sleep.

Sound:

When I asked a representative at Senzer if the S10s were modeled after the Q, he said that they look similar but the quality is different. Unfortunately, due to the mostly glowing reviews of the Q that I read and my own tests of the S10, I have to agree. These truly have a V-shaped sound signature - with bass that I didn't think could come from a driver this size and emphasized treble - to a fault. Mids are recessed and often muddy, and the S10 as a whole has a great soundstage but suffers from a lack of detail and clarity. In my opinion, if Senzer could make the sounds sharper and clearer, these would be among, if not the best itself, the best IEM/ICM I own.

Changing the tips between silicone and foam on the S10 changes the sound signature significantly. The foam tips highlight bass and make it much more fun to listen to, but unfortunately do this at the cost of mids, treble, sound quality, balance, soundstage, and detailing. That's great if you just want to listen to a fun bass line repeated over and over with maybe some other sounds in there (I'm looking at you, EDM) but in any other situation you should favor the silicone eartips, which present a more balanced and detailed sound.

Every single IEM is going to sound slightly different in every ear. The shape of the listener's ear, the fit and amount of isolation, the shape of the IEM, the eartip material, the source, and the listener's ability to hear different frequencies - among other factors - can affect how an IEM sounds. The descriptions I put forth accurately describe the way I hear these IEMs but may not be accurate for everyone.

Bass:

Man, these have fun bass. It's loud, punchy, and has great thump and rumble to go along with strong sub-bass. I don't know how Senzer (or AAW for that matter) managed to fit that into an ICM of this size but as a borderline basshead I'm not complaining. These are the only pair of IEMs or ICMs I own that made me turn down the bass boost on my equalizer because it was just too strong. In fact, I had to check multiple times that I didn't have bass boost on while testing these because it's just that powerful.

The intro of Seven Nation Army sounds like it was made for these ICMs - that is, until the bass drum comes in. The bass is great in a vacuum but loses definition when other sounds come in and bleeds into them a bit as well. Even a song like Sail, which is famous for its bass-heavy intro, sounds fuzzier the more non-bass sounds interact with the bass.

Mids:

Listening to the Pentatonix version of Somebody That I Used To Know explained the S10's mids perfectly. The tenor comes in second, after the bass, and sounds fairly prominent and is as clear as these ICMs allow. However, as alto, treble, and beatbox come in, the mids are pushed to the back. They don't become more muffled or lose sound quality, like the mids of some other budget earphones, but simply go from the front of the sound to the back. The S10's major problem is that sounds don't play well with each other - mids again sound great in a vacuum but recess almost immediately when other sounds are introduced, which isn't helped by the power and bleed of the bass.

Treble:

Treble is pretty prominent and is neither too harsh (though it almost gets there on the intro of Hundred) nor sibilant but unfortunately sounds a bit blanketed. It sounds more like you're listening to a recording coming out of a car radio or speaker rather than listening to the original source. High vocals - both male and female - sound a bit better than background treble but not by much.

Soundstage:


If only they were clearer. The S10s have a surprisingly good soundstage (I sound like a broken record, but especially for a driver this small) and, despite the lack of clarity, I can pick up where each sound is coming from. Rather than sounding like I'm surrounded by the music, it sounds like I'm surrounded by a series of speakers, each of which is playing a different layer of a song, and the speaker for the bass is twice as big as the others.

Comparisons:

vs Rock Zircon (~$13 USD)

At first I thought the S10s could be compared to the Zircons if they doubled the bass, halved the mids, and took 1/3 of the clarity away. The soundstages, after all, seem similarly broad, and both have excellent imaging for the price. However, that description doesn't do enough to cover the differences between them. The S10s are a bass-heavy, fun ICM for casual listeners while the Zircons present a more balanced, clear, and detailed sound that makes all music sound better rather than highlighting music that highlights bass.

vs KZ ZS3 (~$10 USD)


I thought it would be fair to compare these fun, bass-heavy ICMs to the king of fun, bass-heavy IEMs, the KZ ZS3. However, the ZS3 blows these out of the water in terms of clarity and detailing. You can hear where more of the sounds are coming from on the S10s but not by enough to make up for the better treble, mids, clarity, detail, and overall balance of the ZS3.

Final Thoughts:

These are decent ICMs with incredible bass that would be great ICMs with incredible bass if they were clearer. However, they are uniform in their slight lack of clarity, which makes my ear adjust to their sound rather quickly and forget that they could be better until a treble-heavy song plays.

They are also built incredibly well - even though they're a copy of the AAW Q I still have to compliment their construction. The earpieces - which are mostly nozzle and smaller than the tips they come with - are made of metal but are also extremely comfortable and isolate incredibly well.

These are a good buy for a very casual listener and definitely geared towards bassheads; audiophiles should stick to the original Qs.

Comments

alex2750

New Head-Fier
Huh....AAW Q anyone?
Wow. That looks like a direct copy. Thank you, I hadn't seen the AAW IEMs before.

I'm currently in the process of writing a review for these; I'm going to do a bit more research into the AAW Q and see if Senzer managed to recreate them for a tenth of the price or just made a lookalike.
 

B9Scrambler

Headphoneus Supremus
Huh....AAW Q anyone?
Some clear differences like the cable and shape of the rear vent but overall quite similar. Since these aren't available through amazon.ca, I reached out to Senzer to see if they would be willing to provide a sample. A budget version of the Q would be amazing, even if it didn't sound quite as good.
 

alex2750

New Head-Fier
Huh....AAW Q anyone?
I reached out to the person at Senzer who provided these as a sample to me; I'll update this post (or add a comment) when I hear back. These do sound pretty good (I'll post more in-depth about it soon) and seem like a budget version of the Q based on a few reviews I saw but there's only one way to know for sure.
 

Cinder

Formerly known as Res-Reviews
If I were you, folks, I'd save up for a genuine AAW Q. It's a masterpiece of an earphone. I still use it multiple days a week, almost a year (and 60 reviews) after I got it.
 

B9Scrambler

Headphoneus Supremus
If I were you, folks, I'd save up for a genuine AAW Q. It's a masterpiece of an earphone. I still use it multiple days a week, almost a year (and 60 reviews) after I got it.
The Q is great, but I think having the option of getting something as compact as the Q at a much lower price is a pretty cool thing. Lots of people simply want something low profile for sleeping on and the Q's form factor is perfect. The 200+ USD cost of entry is pretty steep though. This will be an awesome alternative, even if the sound quality isn't mind blowingly good. Besides, it's supplied to Senzer by AAW, so you kinda support both companies :)
 

alex2750

New Head-Fier
If I were you, folks, I'd save up for a genuine AAW Q. It's a masterpiece of an earphone. I still use it multiple days a week, almost a year (and 60 reviews) after I got it.
Even a representative at Senzer said that the quality of the Q is better than the quality of the S10. I honestly don't think the S10 should be marketed compared next to the Q but should be seen as a comfortable earphone with good bass and isolation that you can sleep in. If that's all someone is looking for, the ~$200 price difference favors the S10. However, in terms of sound or quality, the Q blows the S10 out of the water and is definitely worth saving up for.
 

Cinder

Formerly known as Res-Reviews
If I were you, folks, I'd save up for a genuine AAW Q. It's a masterpiece of an earphone. I still use it multiple days a week, almost a year (and 60 reviews) after I got it.
Well, I don't think the rep at Senzer really had an option. Did AAW say that they shared their designs with Senzer? If not, then I would personally not buy their product on the grounds that it is dishonest engineering, much in the same way that I firmly believe that the ZS5 should not be bought.
 

B9Scrambler

Headphoneus Supremus
If I were you, folks, I'd save up for a genuine AAW Q. It's a masterpiece of an earphone. I still use it multiple days a week, almost a year (and 60 reviews) after I got it.
I've reached out to AAW to see if they are willing to shed any light on the situation. I'm curious.

I also seriously don't get the ZS5 hate. KZ has been repurposing other's designs forever. I'm certainly not condoning those activities and never have, but why now? Everyone has had LOTS of opportunity to freak out prior to the ZS5; ATE, ATR, DS, CM9, LP series, ANV, etc. etc. Venture Electronics does it too. Heck, compare their logo to that of Sennheiser's. That brand is built off the work of Sennheiser. They make great sounding gear, but until they design their own shells and apply it to at least one ear bud in their lineup, which they are more than capable of doing at this point, they're no better. Yet no one seems to have any issues there. If you're going to condemn one company for stealing a design, at least be consistent.
 

Cinder

Formerly known as Res-Reviews
If I were you, folks, I'd save up for a genuine AAW Q. It's a masterpiece of an earphone. I still use it multiple days a week, almost a year (and 60 reviews) after I got it.
The hate comes not from the theft of design, but from the fact that they advertised it as a 4-way IEM sealed off two of the drivers in each side, effectively lying straight to the face of the public. It's a slimy move, and has made me effectively consider KZ dead in the water.

And lets not sugarcoat what KZ is doing here; it's not just re-purposing. It is theft.
 

B9Scrambler

Headphoneus Supremus
If I were you, folks, I'd save up for a genuine AAW Q. It's a masterpiece of an earphone. I still use it multiple days a week, almost a year (and 60 reviews) after I got it.
Have you tested it for yourself? I'm very skeptical given such a practice makes quite literally no sense, and that there was a lot wrong with the way the 'evidence' was presented in the video you linked on your site. Such as, he was relying on a third party and wouldn't reveal his sources (probably Campfire themselves from the way they reacted to the reviews and given his prior interactions with them), housing was overly mangled so you couldn't actually see how it was designed and if what was being stated was true, no measurements to back up the claims, etc. I'll be testing it for myself when I have the chance, and reporting my findings, with proof, now that I have the tools to do so. Just need the time.
 

Cinder

Formerly known as Res-Reviews
If I were you, folks, I'd save up for a genuine AAW Q. It's a masterpiece of an earphone. I still use it multiple days a week, almost a year (and 60 reviews) after I got it.
If you look closely you can see that the drivers are facing the outer wall of the shell, meaning there's no way they could actually create sound inside the acoustic chamber. Its a simple enough thing to see for me, and considering the shells are made of metal, there's no clean way of opening them up.
 

B9Scrambler

Headphoneus Supremus
If I were you, folks, I'd save up for a genuine AAW Q. It's a masterpiece of an earphone. I still use it multiple days a week, almost a year (and 60 reviews) after I got it.
Plastic shells, and none of his pictures were clear. They show a mangled mess and are blurry to boot. Same with the other pics floating around the web. There's another pic somewhere that shows a small tube is in place for the other two drivers to direct sound to the nozzle. I'm just saying that video should be taken with a large grain of salt until a proper tear down is done.
 
Back
Top