: Sub-bass, great detail and control in highs for it's price range, unbeatable soundstage in closed headphone, good layering and most energetic headphone I've heard.
: No tank-like build quality, high can be too bright and tend to lack body or are too sharp, bass can be faster, mids lack thickness and roundness.
These headphones sound so magical, that you don't want anything to be wrong with them. There is an Achilles heel, but with some care it can be remedied. You have to be careful how to handle them as the yokes holding the cups are a bit fragile. Soundmagic has replaced this specific model with the HP-151 which has a stronger build but same sound applies so this review also applies to the HP-151. On the comfort side of things, the HP-150's are comfortable but do get a bit hot to wear after an hour or two. But let me jump into the sound quality directly.
Let me first start with the entire frequency spectrum. This is a u shaped headphone nearing neutral. The sub-bass is pushed up a bit and the highs are as well, this creates a fun yet reference sound signature similar to the famous DT-770, but with a bigger soundstage and better mids than those. The soundstage on these are probably best in class and only semi-open headphones will provide a bigger stage. The stage is quite wide, deep and has a good height. The imaging of individual layers are precise and so each element in a soundtrack can be pinpointed with ease. This makes this headphone good for busy genres such as with orchestra and classical music, but it plays well with many other genres.
Now on to dissecting the frequency response from bass to mids to highs. The bass on these are good. They go very deep and rumble at the lowest frequencies. The body is quite big even though it lacks control and speed. The bass also kicks and has a bit of a raised area around the 100hz mark to track kicks in a soundtrack. They are pretty good for tracking and I would call these headphones good for tracking in the studio. The drop in the higher bass from 100-200hz makes this headphone have a bit less body than what I'd consider ideal, which in turn makes the headphone a bit clinical.
The mids do have an impact though lack warmth and body. They are detailed and the headphone is good at layering the details seperate from the bass, though high end headphones will still do better in both detail and layering. The texture is also good. The slightly recessed higher mids make the headphone less fatigueing. I perceive the mids to be a bit dry which I think is good for tracking or being analytical in nature.
The highs are a bit peaky and can be sibilant. The peak around the 8khz mark is good for tracking impacts and makes it also good for tracking. They do extend nicely but can get overly bright on bright tracks. This brightness can give a very exciting and energetic presentation and I actually like that character of this headphone. Furthermore, the highs are a bit thin on impact but have a good decay and so blend nicely with the rest of the spectrum. The recessed lower highs give this aforementioned lack of body though this creates the big soundstage as well
Overall I would recommend these over the DT-770, as these are more neutral and have a more precise and bigger soundstage for the same price. These headphones are a good all rounder headphone though definitely are on the bright exciting side so keep that in mind.
-
900x900px-LL-b3085d26_8QfRaht.jpg
20.3 KB
· Views: 0
As for your comments not appear that you have liked.
The HP-150 are very good, regardless of price. I had Fidelio L2, NAD Viso HP50, Fostex TH-600 and Audeze LCD XC.
It has more and better bass than L2, and treble are much sweeter and not hurtful as many times they are in the Philips, and of course, much more comfortable.
Regarding the NAD, it is more transparent and has better treble. It is also quite comfortable.
And compared with Fostex, obviously he hasn't his bass, but are more realistic, not as exaggerated as the Japanese. Their mids are closer and fuller, and treble are much softer.
And finally, it may seem heretical, only I have to say is these are SoundMagic which eventually led me to sell the XC. At all they aren't better, but I can guarantee you that much closer to what one would expect for such a large difference in price between the two. After spend two hours listening to the XC, I put the HP150 and did not feel that they were bad, quite the contrary. Of course, if we consider that the XC cost 10 times more than the HP150, then ...
They really are a MASTER PURCHASE.