TKZK Wave

General Information

Brand: TKZK

Model: Wave

Driver Configuration: 1 (10mm) Dynamic Driver + 1 Balanced Amature

Frequency: 10-40Khz

Sensitivity: 110 +- 3dB@ 1K Hz V0.126V

Impedance: 22Ohm +- 15%

Max Distortion: 3%@1kHz 0.126V

Plug: 3.5mm Gold Plated Plug

Wire Length: 1.2m

Latest reviews

senfi

New Head-Fier
A New Splash of Wave
Pros: Good bright sound profile
Clear and crisp mids
Excellent details
Wonderful fit and the resin material is a plus
Cons: Included tips are not good
May sound shouty and metallic on higher frequencies
Bad stock cable


TKZK Wave : A New Splash of Wave

290991871_1506481386475991_965175070422221314_n.jpg


DISCLAIMER : I bought this TKZK Wave with my own money and this is a pre-owned unit. I received no monetary compensation from anybody even TKZK itself. Rest assured that this will be an honest and unbiased review.

Pros :
Good bright sound profile
Clear and crisp mids
Excellent details
Wonderful fit and the resin material is a plus

Cons :
Included tips are not good
May sound shouty and metallic on higher frequencies
Bad stock cable

Sources used:
LG V50
Zishan U1
Not-By-VE Abigail DAC

PACKAGING :
TKZK offers minimal and a straightforward packaging, nothing fancy. Package includes an earphone pouch, and some wide bore tips.

BASS 3.5/5
Bass is present but not excessive, the mid-bass and sub-bass are on equal par to each other. It does not have that rumbling lows as you would expect on other IEMs in this price range but it still have enough
to even out the higher frequencies. Sadly, bassheads may have to look somewhere else.

MIDS 3.5/5
Mids are clear, with a forward presentation. Upper mids are elevated with enough clarity and air which makes this an ideal earphone that would favor female vocals. However, there are instances that I find
the upper-mids shouty and harsh so I suggest toning it down to the safest volume possible.

TREBLE 4/5
I believe this is where the TKZK Wave shines. It is definitely bright, with the right amount of airiness and decent detail retrieval with no signs of sibilance. At this price point it is a cheap, wonderful alternative from HZSound's Heart Mirror.
Overall they did a pretty decent job.

Soundstage/Imaging 3/5
Soundstage is not that wide, just average and doesn't sound too compressed. The imaging is above-average, with decent accuracy between vocals and instruments but suffers tremendously from low quality tracks and busy tracks you'll be in for an unpleasant listening experience.

Conclusion :
The TKZK Wave is a wonderful and cheap bright IEM that performs way above its price point. It doesn't have the most natural sounding treble around but if you want a decent, detailed IEM somewhere between $25 and wanted to have a change of heart from the usual V-Shaped profiles offered by other Chi-Fi markets.
Then I recommend the Wave for you, really affordable and worth it. I just recommend you to change the cables and eartips though.

290800198_574159377503038_7050183222446918538_n.jpg
  • Like
Reactions: Wuzhishan
J
JB6789
The TKZK Waves are part of my current portfolio of IEM's (S12, Olina (modded), T3+, HZ Heart Mirror (modded), Lea, CCA CRA, CCA NRA, CRN/Zex Pro, ZS10 Pro...). I usually have the Waves attached to a set of AZ09 Pro's for BT5.2/AptX wireless listening. I did use after-market silicone tips with a narrower bore size to slightly dim their bright out-of-the box sound profile. With the after-market tips, these IEM's really perform well and certainly well above their price point. My experience is that your conclusions are spot on.

suicideup

New Head-Fier
TKZK WAVE Review!
Pros: - Very good neutral-bright sound quality for its asking price
- Controlled, lows with fast decay
- Uncolored, clear mids
- Despite being bright, it doesn’t sound lean at all
- Excellent detail retrieval for its asking price.
- Resin-built IEM with good fit and isolation
- Excellent technicalities
- Good choice of eartips
- It is different from the usual IEMs in this price range in terms of sound signature and quality.
Cons: - Not for bass heads (subjective)
- Can sound peaky on high volumes
- Instances of metallic timbre are perceived on some tracks
- The soundstage isn’t narrow or crowded by any means but could be better.
- The cable could be better.
IMG_20220118_002544429-01.jpeg


TKZK Wave Review!

Good day! After 5 days of casual and critical listening, here’s my written review for the TKZK Wave. I like this!

Disclaimer:
  • I bought this unit with my own money, from Shopee. Rest assured that anything you see here will be done with honesty.
  • The following remarks and observations shall be made and owned only by me.
  • No monetary compensation is/was involved before, during, and after the period of creation of this review. TKZK did not even know that I will be creating a review for this one.
  • Your mileage may (and always, will) vary.

(The following observations are done in stock configuration. The photos that are shown are photos taken after the observation period.)

Burn-in time: 5-10 hours per day, 5 days.

Source/s used:

  • Hidizs AP80
  • Not-By-VE Avani Realtek Dongle
  • Samsung Galaxy S3 (WM1811 DAC)
  • Non-HiFi smartphone (realme 5i)
  • Local Files via Foobar and Roon, YouTube Music, Deezer, and Qobuz with UAPP.

IEM and configuration: Stock medium eartips, stock cable, any form of EQ or MSEB off, 40-60% volume, both high and low gain.


Sound signature:

  • Neutral bright sound signature. Controlled, tight linear bass. Almost linear, transparent mids. Elevated, bright highs. Excellent technicalities for its asking price. This IEM deserves to be placed in my “four horsemen” under 40 USD.

Lows:
  • Lows are linear with a very tight presentation. Midbass and sub-bass levels are nearly equal. Subbass exhibits good depth, midbass is punchy enough, but bass heads may ask for more. Decay is fast and does not linger too much. Overall, the bass is presented in a controlled, linear, and clean presentation, but it will be lacking for bass heads and their preferred bass-heavy tracks.
Mids:
  • The mids on the Wave are somewhat linear as well, but to my surprise, it does not sound too lean/thin or too thick. It sounded uncolored based on my observations and findings. Lower notes exhibit good depth and clarity. Upper mids are slightly elevated with above-average clarity, airiness, and sparkle which can make the female vocals sound intimate on some tracks. On higher volumes, the upper mids may sound peaky, but the instances of using this IEM on higher volumes would be rare due to it being easy to drive. Overall, the mids in this IEM sound linear without sounding lean, with instances of peaks on higher volume.
Highs:
  • The highs are elevated, bright. It is well extended with good amount of air and definition. Detail retrieval is above average for its current price, with some instances of metallic timbre on some tracks. Overall, the treble is the highlight of the Wave as it is elevated with good definition and detail retrieval, with some occurrences of splashiness of cymbals on high volume.
Soundstage, Imaging, and separation:
  • The soundstage is average with fairly good level of expansion. Separation is very good for its asking price and can handle busy tracks well. Imaging is precise with a good definition of instrument and vocal position.


Comparison/s:

VS HZSound Heart Mirror

  • The lows on the HM are leaner sounding compared to the Wave, but only within a smaller margin. The mids on the Heart Mirror are also leaner, particularly on the lower mids compared to the Wave. The upper mids on the Wave show more instances of peaks on higher volumes when compared to the HM. The treble on the HM is also brighter and much more extended compared to the Wave and has more details. The soundstage is also wider on the HM, the separation is also better by a very small margin, and the imaging is nearly the same. The Heart Mirror needs a fair amount of power to be driven properly, while the Wave is easy to drive, but will benefit from a decent source.

Pros:
  • Very good neutral-bright sound quality for its asking price
  • Controlled, lows with fast decay
  • Uncolored, clear mids
  • Despite being bright, it doesn’t sound lean at all
  • Excellent detail retrieval for its asking price.
  • Resin-built IEM with good fit and isolation
  • Excellent technicalities
  • Good choice of eartips
  • It is different from the usual IEMs in this price range in terms of sound signature and quality.
Cons:
  • Not for bass heads (subjective)
  • Can sound peaky on high volumes
  • Instances of metallic timbre are perceived on some tracks
  • The soundstage isn’t narrow or crowded by any means but could be better.
  • The cable could be better.

Verdict


The TKZK Wave turned my made-up “holy trinity” IEMs under 40USD into the Four Horsemen under 40$. The four horsemen now consist of BQEYZ KC2, Reecho SG01, HZSound Heart Mirror, and TKZK Wave. All of these IEMs punches way above their asking price in terms of sound quality. Going back to the TKZK Wave, this is a very good IEM and is just under the HZSound Heart Mirror in terms of the overall sound, particularly on the detail retrieval. The TKZK Wave do trade blows with it and did something good – presenting an uncolored sound without sounding too thin, without the help of any EQ.



Thank you for reading!

Additional Photos:

IMG_20220118_002646978-01.jpeg
IMG_20220118_002757746-01.jpeg
  • Like
Reactions: Wuzhishan

ywheng89

100+ Head-Fier
TKZK Wave's Review - Splashing first wave?
Pros: Good amount of detail and resolution at this price point
Respond well to eartips and cable pairing
Good amount of air
Cons: bad stock cable and eartips (does not synergize)
Shouty at high volume
Slightly congested when the track is busy
Small soundstage
TKZK is TinHifi's sub-brand if you are not aware of it. Now that you know. Let's get into it.

Packaging
-Fairly minimal and nothing much to expect at this price point, a storage pouch, and wide bore eartips (Bad pairing), i will get into that later on

Build and Comfort
-Solid build quality, does not look cheap (to me), the wavy design is kinda nice actually and i like it
-Comfortable to wear for long listening session without any discomfort

A83F233C-1E21-481F-8E45-9F18BB028EF7.jpeg


Source
-Tidal -> RHA L1 -> TKZK Wave (OFC cable and Audiosense S400 Eartips)
-Tidal -> Audirect Beam 3 Pro -> TKZK Wave (OFC cable and Audiosense S400 Eartips)

Sound
I have decided not to review this in its stock form. Let me tell you why?
-The cable and the eartips that came with TKZK Wave, not to say its horrible, let's just say they don't work well with each other
-Why do i say that? SPC cable with wide bore eartips and pair it up with a bright IEM, that eventually translate into a shoutfest, especially at high volume
-So i have decided to swap out the cable to Tri Meteor's stock cable and the eartip with Audiosense's S400, the experience? Whole lot better, in fact i enjoy them a lot with this combo
-I do notice there's a slight BA timbre which sounded splashy on certain track

Bass
-Bass presence is adequate and on the warmer side
-Good texture and good control on the mid bass
-Sub bass is however slightly lacking, it is there when it's called for, nothing more nothing less

Mids
-Vocal feels slightly recessed being a mild V shape IEM
-I kinda like how the upper mids come by where the presentation is just nice without causing it to be too shouty
-Both male and female vocal sounded alright, natural, good enough texture

Treble
-No signs of sibilant here, good job TKZK
-However, there's a hint of graininess
-Good amount of air
-Technical capability for TKZK is good enough for its price point and it shouldn't be fault for it, i would say its good enough considering its price, it is not meant to compete with anything that's higher than its price point

Soundstage/Imaging
-Soundstage wise, it is rather small to me, feels a little narrow to my ears
-Imaging wise,the instruments can be pinpointed easily in not so busy track, however, it does struggle to image properly when the track gets busy

Driveability
-Fairly easy to drive
-Good enough to be powered via Apple's Type C dongle
-However it does benefit from better source of course
-Amping it doesn't really provide any additional benefit

Conslusion
Personally i like this IEM, not in its stock setting, because the treble is just too much for me.
If you have a copper cable,or any eartips which are not wide bore, get this and experiment with it, it respond very well to those.

KeepHifi's rep is actually very open in taking in suggestion on how to improve this TKZK and have gathered my opinion on how can it be better and will feedback to TKZK. To me this is a good thing that there's actually some people who care instead of brands who just wanna look for another hype train and ride along and doesn't really care about whether the product that they released is good or not.

*Thanks to KeepHifi for the opportunity to try this out and also taking in us reviewer's feedback to better improve the product.
Do check them on their website if you're interested in grabbing this.
KeepHifi Online Store

C3703568-258E-4067-8505-BAA713758E33.jpeg
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Wuzhishan

Comments

Andrikman87

New Head-Fier

An overview of TKZK Wave hybrid headphones, and a small life hack on how to smooth out the excessive brightness of the model.

Hello friends! Those who have been in the topic of portable audio for a long time know how inexpensive hybrid and even dynamic headphones can sound extremely bright. Using the example of two models of headphones, the hybrid TKZK Wave and the dynamic Reecho SG-03 Star Gate, Maxim and I will show how you can smooth out the peaks at high mids and high frequencies by means of simple damping, but first I propose to talk a little about the hybrid model of the TKZK headphones wave.


Specifications:



Driver type: dynamic, dual voice coil + custom balanced armature
Impedance: 22 ohm
Sensitivity: 110 dB/mW
Frequency response: 10Hz-40KHz
Body material: hypoallergenic resin
Connector: QDC 2Pin 0.75mm, 2pin
Plug: 3.5mm
Cable length: 1.2m±3cm
Cable material: high purity silver plated copper


Contents of delivery:


The headphones come in a compact black cardboard box with a picture of the headphones, the manufacturer's logo and the model name. On the back of the package, we will see the technical characteristics of the model, the factory frequency response curve and the address of the company.

The delivery set of headphones for the budget is unpretentious and simple, it includes:

  • Headphones with ear pads on
  • Complete liquid and scary wire
  • 3 pairs of spare wide nozzle soft silicone ear tips
  • Velvet pouch for carrying headphones
  • Paper documentation set

Headphone appearance:


Headphones are a model made of hypoallergenic acrylic in the form of universal custom silver gray or blue. The face plates of the model copy those of FiiO armature headphones, and show something similar to waves.
The cases of the medium-sized model carry protruding 2Pin connectors on the top of the headphones, a long metal sound guide, and 2 compensation holes each, one of which is located directly above the sound guide, next to the channel markings on the inside of the headphone case, and the second is located at the bottom of the case devices.

Despite the very solid appearance of the protruding "fin" in the back of the model case, the headphones, thanks to the long sound guides, sit perfectly in my ears, and with prolonged use they practically do not cause a feeling of fatigue or discomfort.

Sound:


To test the headphones, we used the Acmee MF02s player, the ES9318 portable DAC and the Meizu 16 smartphone.

In order to understand the essence of the necessary damping actions, I will first describe to you the sound of the TKZK Wave hybrid headphones in stock.

Despite the chamber used for the dynamic driver inside the headphone case, and the corresponding channel for sound output going from it to the sound duct, the reinforcing radiator, in turn, was placed directly inside the sound duct and inside this very sound channel, which naturally gave extremely strong distortions both at high- mid frequencies as well as high frequencies. The output sound is extremely bright, rough and unnatural. Low Frequencies, due to the specific and bright upper mids and high frequencies, are practically not felt. You don't hear or feel a kick of the bass drum, you practically don't hear the drum parts, not to mention any attacks and even decays. Mid Frequencies, calm, but only until the moment when the electric guitar plays, while listening to bright vocal parts is generally unbearable. In this case, it makes no sense at all to talk about any separation of instruments, separation. High Frequencies, in turn with an unnatural "metal ringing". Due to extremely sharp peaks at 4.5 - 8 kHz and beyond, you feel the whole spectrum of sibilants, dirt and other accompanying "pleasant" distortions.

What did Max and I do:

They removed the meshes from the sound ducts, and having found that the reinforcing radiator was almost flush with the edge of the sound duct, they glued one Tanchjim fabric filter from the inside of the mesh. Having put this design in place, we glued one more exactly the same fabric filter on top of the metal mesh.

In the end, we got already very listenable headphones, the graph of which with and without filters you can see above. I will try to tell you about the changes in the sound I hear:

In terms of sound, TKZK Wave has now become very similar to the hit CCA CRA budgets. Differences are more audible only at low frequencies, which are still larger and deeper in dynamic headphones.

Low Frequencies - after damping, they became not only audible, but acquired physicality, volume, and good speed with a very good elaboration. Now the bass of the headphones is punchy, biting and to some extent even textured.

Mid Frequencies - noticeably smoothed out, became calmer and more comfortable in the upper middle. Of course, the sibilants haven't gone away completely, no, no, they slip, but it happens more on low-quality recordings and can't be compared to what it was before the use of Tanchjim fabric filters.

High Frequencies - also noticeably smoothed out. The notorious peak at 8 kHz, of course, has not gone anywhere, but now this range is perceived not so sharply, the unnatural "metallic ringing" is also partially gone, and in general, high frequencies are perceived noticeably more comfortable and informative.

We did a slightly simpler damping (by gluing fabric filters only outside the sound guide mesh) with Reecho SG-03 Star Gate dynamic headphones, a review of which is on our channel.

Unfortunately, the graph of the amplitude-frequency characteristics of the headphones after damping has not been preserved, but I will try to briefly describe the changes in the sound of the model:

This is still quite emotional V-shaped sound, Low Frequencies are dense and massive with good working out in depth, but not very high speed. After applying fabric filters in this range, I did not hear any significant changes, but with the Mids, more obvious changes are already taking place, this is especially audible in the upper middle, which becomes much more comfortable, smoother and even, without sharp peaks, the notorious " dirt" and almost without sibilants. High frequencies are now also perceived as smoother, rounder and more natural.

Output:


What is the result? Due to not entirely correct design solutions, in particular, the placement of a reinforcing radiator inside the sound duct of TKZK Wave hybrid headphones, and without proper damping, we get unbearably bright and sharp headphones at the output, which, without small dances with a tambourine, someone's mother and magic fabric Tanchjim filters are almost impossible to listen to. Almost the same can be said about Reecho SG-03 Star Gate dynamic headphones, and many other similar bright models.

You can buy TKZK Wave hybrid headphones and more in the great HiFiGo online store.

Buy Tanchjim Magic Cloth Filters from DD-Audio Store on AliExpress.

 
Last edited:
Back
Top