Just want to throw this out there. If you like the HD600, you might really like these. Sound stage width is similar, but with ever a bit more depth, like other audeze's I've heard. Sound isn't significantly more aggressive, and the midrange and/or lower treble don't have some weird stuff going on that put's me off a bit like other audeze's I've had in the past, again compared to the 600. Further comparison to the 600; there's a bit more thump in the bass (again though, it's not aggressive. It's reserved in quantity compared the the LCD-X and LCD-2C
from memory), and a bit more laid back in the treble, but it doesn't sound like I'm losing extension compared to the 600. It's nowhere near as dark as the LCD-2C. Overall, of all the Audeze's I've heard (besides maybe the LCD-X) this one is my favorite so far, and I really like the HD600 (still my favorite headphone of all that I've tried - see profile for the list). The characteristic of the overall sound might be favorable to an HD600 lover compared to other "cheaper" audeze is what I'm trying to share.
You still have to turn up the volume to really enjoy the sound on these though, which is an issue I've had with previous audeze cans. But I do listen at very low volumes compared to a few of my friends who's "normal volume" sounds like their blasting their ears out to me. They seem to have normal hearing fwiw.
pics or it didn't happen I guess...
Update: really really liking these more and more. I'm actually preferring these to my HD600 now on some occasions. Laid back but not veild sounding - not booming bass, but audeze signature is there. Doesn't ruin vocals either.
Update 2: don't wanna be "that guy", but hearing these balanced really makes a difference. Yes I believe in balanced and I'm liking the benefit of balanced I hear with these (more separation, more width). No, I don't always like the difference I hear. The balanced amp and dac I'm using is the Acro L1000.