Feb 10, 2025 at 7:30 PM Post #78,631 of 79,041
Interesting about the sub bass. Do you know what drivers are in the Aika?
I'm interested in hearing this Akia , got many basshead buds always in search for the next big hit
The Aika buds are not the bass head earbuds you might imagine they are. Are they capable of sub-bass, yes they are, but this really depends on the mastering of your music.

In regards to the 120Ω Bery Comp driver, they are capable of great quantity of bass, but they also need to be tuned very carefully to sound good across the frequency spectrum which will result in loss of bass quantity. At least that is my experience using them for the Aika buds.

@samandhi's full post: https://www.head-fi.org/threads/earbuds-round-up.441400/post-18100493

As for initial impressions for sound, the Aika are kind of a mixture of things all rolled into one earbud. When we talk about bass quantity, these are near perfect for my normal preferred signature. In other words, they aren't quite neutral, they are boosted a bit, which gives a nice fullness to the overall sound, but they also aren't in your face either. When I am looking for my "guilty pleasure" of a much boosted bass set, these aren't that. The bass overall is pretty linear sounding. Or, put simply the sub bass is higher than the mid bass, which is higher than the upper bass (as it should be to be technically correct). This DOES mean that they don't sound quite as punchy or tight as other sets might, but the texture is there, and they can reach pretty low without muddying up the mids. This also means that on songs the rely on all mid bass, these MIGHT come across as "bass light".... JUST until you hear some sub bass kick in and realize "nope, these are NOT bass light". :) Having said that, all the bass is there all the time, and is well separated (bass guitar from kick drum, from low synth, etc...). I wouldn't call the upper lows boosted too much, but these definitely come across as having some nice warmth.

These are NOT a mid forward bud. I also wouldn't call them totally recessed either. I might call these a mild W tuning. The mids are't quite as strong in the lower mids as they are in the upper mids but they are neither too thin, nor too thick sounding. These have a bit of a boost to the presence region, but in a tasteful way. They don't hurt my ears here.

The treble seems to have some dips in areas, but I don't really hear any spikes to make it sound "off" to my ears. The cymbals, for instance aren't laid back enough to sound recessed, but are not boosted so as to make them sound louder than the rest of the drums (this is an excellent thing). This is where I hear the dip, but it is a good thing IMO. Because the treble has no spikes or huge dips, the second harmonics passed on to other frequencies is just right. The upper treble seems a bit boosted to me and adds some nice air to things. This makes for a presentation that is smooth, yet precise and airy.

The technicalities on these things are a dream. Because of the small dip in the mids, there is a perceived depth that just sounds gorgeous. As for width, all I can say is: man, are these OUT OF MY HEAD sounding. :) Anything from Clapton, or Herbie Hancock, etc... just sound sublime on these. With most metal though the separation seems to allow for some congestion, but it is not horrible (I would simply consider it average). But imaging is really good here. The resolution is really good here as well. Live recordings sound awesome with this set. The things I mentioned give the overall presentation a sound where NOTHING is intimate sounding.

Another note is that these are indeed revealing, and if your recording sounds like crap, these won't "dress it up" for you. These also won't be my favorite for any really aggressive sounding music. These were appropriately named, and sound at their best with milder music (though they do NOT sound bad with anything in the opposite direction either).

When I listen to these, I am reminded of the FQL Caelum, and if anyone remembers them, the Hifiman HE800 Silver, but with different elements in the specific parts of the tuning.
 
Feb 10, 2025 at 8:41 PM Post #78,632 of 79,041
Where is the Akia?
I'm interested in hearing this Akia , got many basshead buds always in search for the next big hit
Unfortunately, these are not for sale. These were/are a labor of love, and I wouldn't count these as basshead levels for earbuds; but just right IMHO.

It has been my experience that the 150Ω Bio make for some of the best super bassy sets. I have a set that rivals some IEMs I own (though, not any that are considered basshead IEMs).
 
Feb 10, 2025 at 8:47 PM Post #78,633 of 79,041
Unfortunately, these are not for sale. These were/are a labor of love, and I wouldn't count these as basshead levels for earbuds; but just right IMHO.

It has been my experience that the 150Ω Bio make for some of the best super bassy sets. I have a set that rivals some IEMs I own (though, not any that are considered basshead IEMs).
120Ω Bio for me is my fave for bass.
 
Feb 10, 2025 at 8:49 PM Post #78,634 of 79,041
120Ω Bio for me is my fave for bass.
Must be something about the Bio driver that is special (in that regard)?! :)

Edit: I actually like 100Ω Bio for a combination of quantity and quality. It seems a bit less in quantity, but the super quality makes up for that tiny bit less IMHO. Having said that, I am not terribly experienced with too many different brands/makes of said drivers, so there is that....
 
Last edited:
Feb 10, 2025 at 9:01 PM Post #78,635 of 79,041
I guess I should have typed that "the bass is very impressive to my ears". :)

Not being a bass head, I was(and still am) very impressed by the amount of bass. I still get nice sub bass extension on certain songs. But would a bass connoisseur be impressed? I have no idea. I don't have anything bassy to compare them to. Like the Fiio line for example.

My apologies if my thoughts caused an up-stir. :pray:
 
Feb 11, 2025 at 12:16 AM Post #78,637 of 79,041
120 bery comp, Smabat 150 TI, 32 comp TI and 150 BG are the drivers with the most bass.
@mt877 have you tried the 120LCP driver?
Thanks, I haven't tried the 120LCP yet. Correct me if I'm wrong. I think the 120LCP is supposed to have a somewhat balanced sound with quality bass and smooth mids / treble.
 
Feb 11, 2025 at 2:08 AM Post #78,638 of 79,041
Thanks, I haven't tried the 120LCP yet. Correct me if I'm wrong. I think the 120LCP is supposed to have a somewhat balanced sound with quality bass and smooth mids / treble.
Yes, 120LCP can be like this or mids and treble a little bit agresive ( in a good way )
 
Last edited:
Feb 11, 2025 at 5:51 AM Post #78,639 of 79,041
I guess I should have typed that "the bass is very impressive to my ears". :)

Not being a bass head, I was(and still am) very impressed by the amount of bass. I still get nice sub bass extension on certain songs. But would a bass connoisseur be impressed? I have no idea. I don't have anything bassy to compare them to. Like the Fiio line for example.

My apologies if my thoughts caused an up-stir. :pray:
Don't sweat it... I didn't take it as you meaning they were bass head levels of bass. Your impressions were pretty much spot-on IMO. :) They do indeed have some impressive bass when compared to other sets of flatties... ;)
 
Feb 11, 2025 at 11:36 AM Post #78,641 of 79,041
Ucotech budget earbud mk2 (The name needs work honestly)
Not bad, safe tuning but not amazing techs. Nice tone, simple setup, would gladly take over the moondrop u2. Similar to eb2s but more neutral tone, both are now amazing contenders for the price. I would strongly suggest others give it a go!

I personally dont really want to do a "review" impression for these but theyre nice enough to satisfy the average fan of earbuds.

Decent midbass, more than average earbuds which is likely down to the improved seal I am getting from the shell shape. Lightweight, decent mids and instrumental seperation to create a smooth sound. Again, not amazing, its a budget set but I enjoy.

1739291683355.jpeg

1739291695203.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Feb 11, 2025 at 7:55 PM Post #78,642 of 79,041
Impressions for the Yincrow RW-3000.
All listening and comparisons have been done via the Qudelix 5k, as it is the only source I own, apart from my retired Radsone ES100. I first tried full foams, was shocked by the amount of bass and went to donut foam, which is still on there now and makes for a more balanced listen for my old ears. 😜
First off: The RW-3000 is a mighty fine sounding earbud!
It is balanced sounding with a bass boost, which surprised me. From what I had read before I expected this set to be brighter. I could also say that this is a very shallow V-shape, seeing that there is the bass boost and more vocal presence and lower treble compared to the upper treble. It is not that the upper treble rolls off a lot however, cymbals sound complete and absolutely correct, they are just less upfront as in the DBX for instance.
The timbre is very nice. There is a certain high end feeling silky slickness to the sound. This makes it sound a bit like details would be smoothed over, but this is definitely not the case! I will make an analogy here:
You could buy a Fender Deluxe Reverb which is a tried and true guitar amp that can give you all your classic american guitar tones from pristine clean sound to rock and blues sounds. Or you could buy some Toneking boutique amp, which will also give you your classic american guitar sounds but with a certain twist to it which might not be noticable right away. The RW3000 is the Toneking in our analogy here. If you'd prefer the Toneking to the Fender Deluxe is a question only you can answer, after all the Deluxe is the real deal, isn't it? 😁
You can listen to the RW3000 all day long because of its silky sound and won't get tired of it. This again makes it sound like the treble would be a bit recessed, which it is certainly not. It is perfectly dosed. The RW3000 doesn't grab your attention and forces you to listen critically, but you can if you want to - all the detail is there. In part the unfatiquing nature of the RW3000 is also rooted in a certain dominance of bass over the rest of the frequency response. Bass guitar (or its equivalent in electronic styles) is nearly always taking center stage here, which for me is a bit of a downside.
I find the RW3000 to not have a very wide and deep stage, but within its width the imaging and seperation is really really good, so the width is not a problem at all, but rather part of the "not forcing you to listen critically" mentality of the RW3000. Concerning the depth I find myself craving some more. The layering is fine, the vocal presence is perfect for my tastes, so the vocals are placed in perfect distance dor my liking and the cymbals and drums are placed behind. In relation to width and depth there is more height than in any other earbud I own. Transient response and dynamics are very good, beeing responsible for the great seperation, which in turn helps the other instruments not beeing drowned by the certain mid- and upper bass dominance the RW3000 exhibits.
Bass:
I think there is actually decent subbass and it probably doesn't even roll of too heavily. It is just that the bass response has by far the most energy in the midbass, probably around 150 HZ or slightly above. The bass is punchy and quick, but you wont really notice that if a bassline is playing in the range where the RW3000 has the most energy. Then the bassdrum will definitely take a backseat. At the 5 min mark of Get Lucky by Daft Punk the Bassdrum is playing alone for a while. Super punchy and sounds absolutely great. Sadly the rest of the song this bassdrum is beeing drowned out a little by the bassline. This I am not a fan of. On the other hand the bass of the RW3000 manages to not ever overstep into the lower mids, which is a mystery to me, given the amount of mid- and upper bass it has. Male voices do not sound overly warm, but have good note weight. Because of the relatively strong upper bass the texture of the bass is only good and not great.
I think the bass is really refined and good, the tuning just doesn't hit my preference. It is however a part of the silkiness of the overall tuning.
Mids:
Really really nice and great timbre there. Even between male and female vocals. Especially woodwind and brass benefit from the silky nature of the tuning and sound absolutely spectacular. Electric guitars sound rich and have the perfect bite.
Treble:
Very smooth sounding! Next best treble I have ever heard apart from Temperament DBX. Slight overemphasis of mid treble over upper treble. It doesn't really feel like there is too strong treble rolloff or extension missing. A similar thing happening here as with the subbass. Again part of the silkiness of the tuning. (I am hoping this is the last time I am using this word in this impressions post, as are you most probably! 🤣)
Conclusion:
The RW3000 is a very musical sounding earbud - a very refined tuning. I can totally see this beeing endgame for some. As it stands right now I am devided, as the bass somehow doesn't do it for me. Also I have no desire to EQ this, seeing how refined it sounds.
Comparisons with Temperament DBX, VE SMG and Rikubuds GAS3 to follow sometime in the next days.

Oh, I forgot to mention a peculiarity:
The fit is really good for me, the asymmetric shell is very comfy. The buds are marked as left and right. If you plug in the red mmcx into the right bud then it is setup for over ear wearing, meaning that these buds are really meant to wear over ear. However they also fit perfectly fine cable down. In this case you have to switch the buds on the cable wearing the left bud in the right ear. In my opinion they should have made the buds without the markings.
 
Last edited:
Feb 12, 2025 at 2:21 AM Post #78,644 of 79,041
Impressions for the Yincrow RW-3000.
All listening and comparisons have been done via the Qudelix 5k, as it is the only source I own, apart from my retired Radsone ES100. I first tried full foams, was shocked by the amount of bass and went to donut foam, which is still on there now and makes for a more balanced listen for my old ears. 😜
First off: The RW-3000 is a mighty fine sounding earbud!
It is balanced sounding with a bass boost, which surprised me. From what I had read before I expected this set to be brighter. I could also say that this is a very shallow V-shape, seeing that there is the bass boost and more vocal presence and lower treble compared to the upper treble. It is not that the upper treble rolls off a lot however, cymbals sound complete and absolutely correct, they are just less upfront as in the DBX for instance.
The timbre is very nice. There is a certain high end feeling silky slickness to the sound. This makes it sound a bit like details would be smoothed over, but this is definitely not the case! I will make an analogy here:
You could buy a Fender Deluxe Reverb which is a tried and true guitar amp that can give you all your classic american guitar tones from pristine clean sound to rock and blues sounds. Or you could buy some Toneking boutique amp, which will also give you your classic american guitar sounds but with a certain twist to it which might not be noticable right away. The RW3000 is the Toneking in our analogy here. If you'd prefer the Toneking to the Fender Deluxe is a question only you can answer, after all the Deluxe is the real deal, isn't it? 😁
You can listen to the RW3000 all day long because of its silky sound and won't get tired of it. This again makes it sound like the treble would be a bit recessed, which it is certainly not. It is perfectly dosed. The RW3000 doesn't grab your attention and forces you to listen critically, but you can if you want to - all the detail is there. In part the unfatiquing nature of the RW3000 is also rooted in a certain dominance of bass over the rest of the frequency response. Bass guitar (or its equivalent in electronic styles) is nearly always taking center stage here, which for me is a bit of a downside.
I find the RW3000 to not have a very wide and deep stage, but within its width the imaging and seperation is really really good, so the width is not a problem at all, but rather part of the "not forcing you to listen critically" mentality of the RW3000. Concerning the depth I find myself craving some more. The layering is fine, the vocal presence is perfect for my tastes, so the vocals are placed in perfect distance dor my liking and the cymbals and drums are placed behind. In relation to width and depth there is more height than in any other earbud I own. Transient response and dynamics are very good, beeing responsible for the great seperation, which in turn helps the other instruments not beeing drowned by the certain mid- and upper bass dominance the RW3000 exhibits.
Bass:
I think there is actually decent subbass and it probably doesn't even roll of too heavily. It is just that the bass response has by far the most energy in the midbass, probably around 150 HZ or slightly above. The bass is punchy and quick, but you wont really notice that if a bassline is playing in the range where the RW3000 has the most energy. Then the bassdrum will definitely take a backseat. At the 5 min mark of Get Lucky by Daft Punk the Bassdrum is playing alone for a while. Super punchy and sounds absolutely great. Sadly the rest of the song this bassdrum is beeing drowned out a little by the bassline. This I am not a fan of. On the other hand the bass of the RW3000 manages to not ever overstep into the lower mids, which is a mystery to me, given the amount of mid- and upper bass it has. Male voices do not sound overly warm, but have good note weight. Because of the relatively strong upper bass the texture of the bass is only good and not great.
I think the bass is really refined and good, the tuning just doesn't hit my preference. It is however a part of the silkiness of the overall tuning.
Mids:
Really really nice and great timbre there. Even between male and female vocals. Especially woodwind and brass benefit from the silky nature of the tuning and sound absolutely spectacular. Electric guitars sound rich and have the perfect bite.
Treble:
Very smooth sounding! Next best treble I have ever heard apart from Temperament DBX. Slight overemphasis of mid treble over upper treble. It doesn't really feel like there is too strong treble rolloff or extension missing. A similar thing happening here as with the subbass. Again part of the silkiness of the tuning. (I am hoping this is the last time I am using this word in this impressions post, as are you most probably! 🤣)
Conclusion:
The RW3000 is a very musical sounding earbud - a very refined tuning. I can totally see this beeing endgame for some. As it stands right now I am devided, as the bass somehow doesn't do it for me. Also I have no desire to EQ this, seeing how refined it sounds.
Comparisons with Temperament DBX, VE SMG and Rikubuds GAS3 to follow sometime in the next days.

Oh, I forgot to mention a peculiarity:
The fit is really good for me, the asymmetric shell is very comfy. The buds are marked as left and right. If you plug in the red mmcx into the right bud then it is setup for over ear wearing, meaning that these buds are really meant to wear over ear. However they also fit perfectly fine cable down. In this case you have to switch the buds on the cable wearing the left bud in the right ear. In my opinion they should have made the buds without the markings.
Thanks for sharing your impressions. And, I am glad you find them to your liking (mostly)... :)
 
Feb 12, 2025 at 3:41 AM Post #78,645 of 79,041
Impressions for the Yincrow RW-3000.
All listening and comparisons have been done via the Qudelix 5k, as it is the only source I own, apart from my retired Radsone ES100. I first tried full foams, was shocked by the amount of bass and went to donut foam, which is still on there now and makes for a more balanced listen for my old ears. 😜
First off: The RW-3000 is a mighty fine sounding earbud!
It is balanced sounding with a bass boost, which surprised me. From what I had read before I expected this set to be brighter. I could also say that this is a very shallow V-shape, seeing that there is the bass boost and more vocal presence and lower treble compared to the upper treble. It is not that the upper treble rolls off a lot however, cymbals sound complete and absolutely correct, they are just less upfront as in the DBX for instance.
The timbre is very nice. There is a certain high end feeling silky slickness to the sound. This makes it sound a bit like details would be smoothed over, but this is definitely not the case! I will make an analogy here:
You could buy a Fender Deluxe Reverb which is a tried and true guitar amp that can give you all your classic american guitar tones from pristine clean sound to rock and blues sounds. Or you could buy some Toneking boutique amp, which will also give you your classic american guitar sounds but with a certain twist to it which might not be noticable right away. The RW3000 is the Toneking in our analogy here. If you'd prefer the Toneking to the Fender Deluxe is a question only you can answer, after all the Deluxe is the real deal, isn't it? 😁
You can listen to the RW3000 all day long because of its silky sound and won't get tired of it. This again makes it sound like the treble would be a bit recessed, which it is certainly not. It is perfectly dosed. The RW3000 doesn't grab your attention and forces you to listen critically, but you can if you want to - all the detail is there. In part the unfatiquing nature of the RW3000 is also rooted in a certain dominance of bass over the rest of the frequency response. Bass guitar (or its equivalent in electronic styles) is nearly always taking center stage here, which for me is a bit of a downside.
I find the RW3000 to not have a very wide and deep stage, but within its width the imaging and seperation is really really good, so the width is not a problem at all, but rather part of the "not forcing you to listen critically" mentality of the RW3000. Concerning the depth I find myself craving some more. The layering is fine, the vocal presence is perfect for my tastes, so the vocals are placed in perfect distance dor my liking and the cymbals and drums are placed behind. In relation to width and depth there is more height than in any other earbud I own. Transient response and dynamics are very good, beeing responsible for the great seperation, which in turn helps the other instruments not beeing drowned by the certain mid- and upper bass dominance the RW3000 exhibits.
Bass:
I think there is actually decent subbass and it probably doesn't even roll of too heavily. It is just that the bass response has by far the most energy in the midbass, probably around 150 HZ or slightly above. The bass is punchy and quick, but you wont really notice that if a bassline is playing in the range where the RW3000 has the most energy. Then the bassdrum will definitely take a backseat. At the 5 min mark of Get Lucky by Daft Punk the Bassdrum is playing alone for a while. Super punchy and sounds absolutely great. Sadly the rest of the song this bassdrum is beeing drowned out a little by the bassline. This I am not a fan of. On the other hand the bass of the RW3000 manages to not ever overstep into the lower mids, which is a mystery to me, given the amount of mid- and upper bass it has. Male voices do not sound overly warm, but have good note weight. Because of the relatively strong upper bass the texture of the bass is only good and not great.
I think the bass is really refined and good, the tuning just doesn't hit my preference. It is however a part of the silkiness of the overall tuning.
Mids:
Really really nice and great timbre there. Even between male and female vocals. Especially woodwind and brass benefit from the silky nature of the tuning and sound absolutely spectacular. Electric guitars sound rich and have the perfect bite.
Treble:
Very smooth sounding! Next best treble I have ever heard apart from Temperament DBX. Slight overemphasis of mid treble over upper treble. It doesn't really feel like there is too strong treble rolloff or extension missing. A similar thing happening here as with the subbass. Again part of the silkiness of the tuning. (I am hoping this is the last time I am using this word in this impressions post, as are you most probably! 🤣)
Conclusion:
The RW3000 is a very musical sounding earbud - a very refined tuning. I can totally see this beeing endgame for some. As it stands right now I am devided, as the bass somehow doesn't do it for me. Also I have no desire to EQ this, seeing how refined it sounds.
Comparisons with Temperament DBX, VE SMG and Rikubuds GAS3 to follow sometime in the next days.

Oh, I forgot to mention a peculiarity:
The fit is really good for me, the asymmetric shell is very comfy. The buds are marked as left and right. If you plug in the red mmcx into the right bud then it is setup for over ear wearing, meaning that these buds are really meant to wear over ear. However they also fit perfectly fine cable down. In this case you have to switch the buds on the cable wearing the left bud in the right ear. In my opinion they should have made the buds without the markings.
Great write up, I don't have vocabulary to ever get my impressions out like that!

RW3000 and DB1 are the most frequently switched to and from for me, so your comparison with DBX should be not to far away. It takes me 3-4 songs to get over reduced bass in DB1 and then it opens up like a flower and shines 😅

Same the other way around - need 3-4 tracks to accommodate for more bass in RW3000.

And before you call full foams to bassy try different ones as there could be some perfect match out there
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top