That's perfect for your next build project!what about rainbow dildos
no picture cause i dont wanna get banned
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
flinkenick's 17 Flagship IEM Shootout Thread (and general high-end portable audio discussion)
KuroKitsu
Headphoneus Supremus
Pithy's probably already incorporated it. Rainbow Dildo faceplates and with an additional vent in his head with a rainbow dildo filter ala Apex.That's perfect for your next build project!
kurokitsu is rightDo you mean as a CIEM design or do you just generally want rainbow dildos in your ears?
I have a rather annoying question, to my knowledge, iBasso players and Sony players don't connect their fifth pole to a circuit ground in the trrrs jack so active shielding doesn't actually work. Are there any players that do?
I don't think we have ever declined an artwork based on its content alone, so ...you knowwhat about rainbow dildos
no picture cause i dont wanna get banned
davidcotton
X-CANs and HDAMs
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2001
- Posts
- 7,701
- Likes
- 2,195
I don't think we have ever declined an artwork based on its content alone, so ...you know
Don't encourage him
goodvibes
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2009
- Posts
- 9,545
- Likes
- 1,888
In theory, common mode rejection would render a (passive but earthed) shield superfluous.I suppose it would be easy enough to open it up and connect it to the chassis ot the ground lug of a TRS connector if it has one..I have a rather annoying question, to my knowledge, iBasso players and Sony players don't connect their fifth pole to a circuit ground in the trrrs jack so active shielding doesn't actually work. Are there any players that do?
buonassi
Headphoneus Supremus
so common mode noise rejection works with a 2 conductor per channel circuit? I thought there had to be 3 per channel? IE, the only way to shield a 4 core IEM cable would be physically? I'm asking and don't know for sure.
goodvibes
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2009
- Posts
- 9,545
- Likes
- 1,888
It's not about the # of cores in a cable.It has to do with whether it's a truly balanced circuit. If so, common mode rejection is in effect whether there's a shield or not. Not an issue at the output of a dap. Shielding an iem cable is akin to shielding a speaker cable. All it does is add capacitance and reactance to the load. This is a bit over simplified but you see grounds/shields on other balanced cables to maintain a proper earth throughout an electronics system but IEMs are just like speakers and not earthed. I would also argue that the overall of a device is significantly more controlled by other factors than whether it's balanced or not.
Last edited:
buonassi
Headphoneus Supremus
Is it fair to say then that any noise being picked up from the IEM cable (like an antenna) would be nulled out by the balanced circuit inside the DAP, since it would become 'common' noise?
edit: rather the IEM cable becomes part of the balanced circuit - which is why any noise picked up on it can be nulled out?
edit: rather the IEM cable becomes part of the balanced circuit - which is why any noise picked up on it can be nulled out?
Last edited:
"Hmmm... haven't dropped any good teasers in a while... let's see what I've got in my photo library..."
"Ahh, this should do."
"Ahh, this should do."
stop my penis can only get so erect"Hmmm... haven't dropped any good teasers in a while... let's see what I've got in my photo library..."
"Ahh, this should do."
davidmolliere
Headphoneus Supremus
Is the Noir any different from Fourté aside from color ?
Users who are viewing this thread
Total: 6 (members: 0, guests: 6)