I mean, in the case of Immanis it's double the price (and the CA-1a gets rated below the HEKv2 by Wavetheory).TOTL performance at half the price
I'm in the camp of: Just get a headphone that aligns with your preferences. There are enough options out there.
Of course you can use EQ, but playing around with the chain is the fun part of this hobby. If i don't like a headphone i get a different one instead of trying to fixing it. If it's good, it's good, even with some minor quirks like the small 1,2kHz bump of the LCD-4 or the recessed voices of a 1266. In the majority of cases, if you add something, it takes something away. Can be timbre, can be something else. Even if you don't get bothered by it and purely see a benefit using EQ (or filters), switching them everytime when i'm swapping a headphone / IEM would annoy me.
I'm not saying it's not useful, especially for checking your preferences, but if i pay 10k€ for an Immanis i would be angry if i would have to use some form of digital enhancement to have a good time.
I'm also quite the opposite of someone like Resolve, who EQ's everything. I have gear that i truly enjoy which people would call objectively wonky at best (1266, Valkyria, Trifecta, etc).
Last edited: