Redcarmoose
Headphoneus Supremus
Well, I actually got the 1Z when they were introducing 2.00 firmware. I purchased the 1Z the day before. The 1A happened because I simply liked the 1Z and wanted a DAP for outside. But after getting it, I fell in love with the 1A and couldn’t risk going outside with it.
The best thing to happen to the 1A was the region change. Also newly introduced...... the very first tune aftermarket software! This was before MrWalkman arrived. But the new tunes were great because with region J the 1A was now warm. That’s when it started to rack up hours and start to equal the 1Z hours.
Long story short, the 1A was crippled by Sony and has inferior sound to make the 1Z look good. The 1A improved the most with aftermarket software and regions. Still there was a time when the midrange of the 1A had me spellbound. I put my 1Z away for months concentrating on the 1A midrange. Still coming back to the 1Z though reconfirms the sonic reality it bestows upon sound! The 1Z is in truth miles better than the 1A (all in 10%) but that doesn’t make the 1A less entertaining to use. It’s just that the 1Z has a circular soundstage and the 1A has a right to left soundstage. The bass in the 1Z is full and has a serious physical side. The 1A bass is fast and agile. The treble of the 1Z is spread out into a fish bowl around your head with 3D elements inside. The 1A treble sits behind the forward midrange yet is nice in its own way. I look forward to learning your impressions! PM me if your curious about firmware settings.
The 1A/1Z personality traits stay consistent even underneath the MrWalkman firmware choices, though the 1A has the most to benefit from region and aftermarket firmware.
The best thing to happen to the 1A was the region change. Also newly introduced...... the very first tune aftermarket software! This was before MrWalkman arrived. But the new tunes were great because with region J the 1A was now warm. That’s when it started to rack up hours and start to equal the 1Z hours.
Long story short, the 1A was crippled by Sony and has inferior sound to make the 1Z look good. The 1A improved the most with aftermarket software and regions. Still there was a time when the midrange of the 1A had me spellbound. I put my 1Z away for months concentrating on the 1A midrange. Still coming back to the 1Z though reconfirms the sonic reality it bestows upon sound! The 1Z is in truth miles better than the 1A (all in 10%) but that doesn’t make the 1A less entertaining to use. It’s just that the 1Z has a circular soundstage and the 1A has a right to left soundstage. The bass in the 1Z is full and has a serious physical side. The 1A bass is fast and agile. The treble of the 1Z is spread out into a fish bowl around your head with 3D elements inside. The 1A treble sits behind the forward midrange yet is nice in its own way. I look forward to learning your impressions! PM me if your curious about firmware settings.
Edit:I remember that you shared before that the 1A is more of its own beast rather than an inferior 1Z, and then Sony staff told me that there is 1 left so I thought why not. At the very worst it will become a collector item from the first gen Z signature for me so I don't lose anything.
Since you got yours at launch I'm basically re-walking your steps of the last 5 years haha. I'm very late to the party and still I enjoy every bit of these. I have much to learn from all the sempai here.
The 1A/1Z personality traits stay consistent even underneath the MrWalkman firmware choices, though the 1A has the most to benefit from region and aftermarket firmware.
Last edited: