**TESTED** Hifiman HE-500 1/4 inch TRS vs Balanced XLR...Is there any difference?
Oct 23, 2013 at 2:27 AM Thread Starter Post #1 of 4

cskippy

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Jul 30, 2013
Posts
1,954
Likes
1,068
Location
Tempe, AZ
Hello fellow headfiers,
 
First, I would like to say thank you. I have learned so much about headphones, amps, and DACs, and am proof that the statement, “Welcome to headfi, sorry about your wallet.” is an inevitability.
 
I have read several posts on different threads asking about the difference in sound between ¼ inch TRS and 4-pin balanced XLR. Besides the obvious volume increase, I was curious if the added power actually changed the sound in any way.
 
I decided to set up a simple test that would compare the frequency response between single-ended and balanced outputs.
 
My test setup was as follows: Room EQ Wizard V5 sine sweep output → MR816x I/O (used firewire input from computer and output via coax S/PDIF output) → coax S/PDIF input on Audio GD NFB-10ES2 → Hifiman HE-500
 
Sound was captured by a MiniDSP UMIK-1 acoustic measurement microphone, which is connected via USB and has a unique calibration file applied to results.
 
The results:
 
HE-500 4-pin Balanced XLR Frequency Response:

 
HE-500 ¼ inch TRS Frequency Response:

 
(Each test was done consecutively without moving the headphones or mic placement)
 
 
Although I wasn't able to match their levels perfectly, there is an obvious change to the frequency response between single-ended and balanced. I'm not sure if this is specific to my setup but I did a total of 4 tests of each and the results were the same. There is a gradual roll off of the higher frequencies starting above 1 kHz. At 10 kHz there is a decrease of ~4 dB, and at 16 kHz there is almost a 9 dB reduction.
 
These results are very interesting to me. I've heard that more power gives better control over the drivers and improves low frequency response and impact. When listening in balanced XLR, I thought I noticed a more prominent bass. However, these results show that there isn't necessarily a more prominent low end but a less prominent high-mid and treble response.
 
I did more tests today and found out that my results were most likely due to testing inaccuracies.  A slight change in position of the headphones or microphone or a change in pressure to hold the ear pieces together gave remarkably different results.  
 
After doing 5 separate tests with different mic positions and varying pressures, the only constant was that the frequency response didn't change.  I've updated the graphs to support this.
 
I can conclude that there is not any change in the frequency response between balanced and single-ended.  However, there seems to be better controlled bass in balanced operation.
 
FYI the Audio GD NFB-10ES2 is rated at ~7.5 W for my HE-500 with a measured 40 Ohm impedance in balanced output. Single-ended output is ~2 W.  Thank you Kingwa for the excellent product!  
biggrin.gif
 
 
Jan 4, 2017 at 9:39 PM Post #3 of 4
Holy **** this is actually interesting. I spent the money on balanced connectors for a balanced amp and cables, and suprised to see it was all trickery in the head. Also, are you using this stock? Im surprised also that this isnt more popular. Shurly i thought that a website founded on expensive placebo, with a topic like this would drive more discussions.

All the best
 
Jan 4, 2017 at 9:48 PM Post #4 of 4
Interesting! Could you provide an overlay of the two graphs? Also, are you able to test for channel separation ie:crosstalk?

Edit: Oh crap! I didn't know this was a necro thread.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top