The Stax Thread III
Jun 24, 2022 at 1:50 PM Post #22,591 of 25,656
Stax needed financial stability & security, which Edifier seems to provide. The Spirit model looks cute and is not gonna confuse any of us electrostat enthusiasts. I don't see a problem here, as long as Stax remains largely autonomous in designing "real" Stax gear. Of course as soon as that changes, Edifier will become the devil in our eyes :p
 
Jun 25, 2022 at 3:32 AM Post #22,592 of 25,656
The 007/9 is incredible with tube amps, a mixture of 009 and 007, details and transparency of 009 and meatyness and warmth of 007 . The sound is very clean and warm, this is my dream phone.

069A01F1-4265-4E7B-A4F9-B8BF198E9FEF.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Jun 25, 2022 at 7:26 AM Post #22,593 of 25,656
Is it normal for the KGSS Klassik case to get very hot after listening to the L700 at moderate volumes for about one hour?
I hit 125F normally with my Burson 3XP + 3A Supercharger, which absolutely feels very hot lol. (but apparently is OK/normal)
PXL_20220419_141637056.jpg
 
Last edited:
Jun 25, 2022 at 7:34 AM Post #22,594 of 25,656
I hit 125C normally with my Burson 3XP + 3A Supercharger, which absolutely feels very hot lol. (but apparently is OK/normal)
PXL_20220419_141637056.jpg
Wait, you said 125 C but the photo shows 123.2 F, which is like 50 C 🤔
 
Jun 25, 2022 at 7:39 AM Post #22,595 of 25,656
Wait, you said 125 C but the photo shows 123.2 F, which is like 50 C 🤔
Oh wait, my bad LOL. Got computers on the mind, apparently... :computer:
 
Jun 25, 2022 at 7:41 AM Post #22,596 of 25,656
50C is completely normal for a tubs based amp - but for a transistor like thd KGSS it is rather hot.
 
Last edited:
Jun 25, 2022 at 2:23 PM Post #22,598 of 25,656
Hopefully we get tomorrow measured Stax phones 007/9 and 009/7 . I think at least we get from 007/9 (@trance gott approved bass) . This phone makes me wonder how much bass potentiality is hidden in X9K wich has much larger driver.

If measurements are good a handy DIY guy should sign up to make few 007/9 for those who are interested. Precision tools are needed because you have to drill some holes and other adjustments to decrease resonances etc. Hopefully the DIY guy practises some ZEN meditation, a wrong move can cost you in a instant second thousands of dollars.
 
Last edited:
Jun 25, 2022 at 2:46 PM Post #22,599 of 25,656
Amazed by this report @thinker , was just about to sell my 007A, now Im interested in getting a used 009.. if someone can make the fusion for me. Actually, since my 007A is in Brazil Im still better selling it and maybe latter when someone is doing this double-cross mod..
and the 007 and 007mkII share exactly the same driver, right?
 
Jun 26, 2022 at 1:59 PM Post #22,601 of 25,656
Hopefully we get tomorrow measured Stax phones 007/9 and 009/7 .

These are approximative non-scientific REW measurements with miniDSP rig, e.g. my HD650 measurements look exactly like Tyll Hertsen's - but that's just anecdotal precision :).

Note that he measurements for @thinker 's Stax 007 mk2 drivers in the 009 housing are not here since I had a coupling issue with my rig, and the measurements didn't quite validate well. But take a look at the Libratum 3 measurements below, they were near identical. Also sound-wise they were very similar, large sound stage, relaxed sound, very musical, one can listen the whole day to them. Even the slight 7K notch was the same - which might be due to coupling resonances with my rig, so these plots are not to be confused with the truth :), but I could hear the slight reservedness or politeness of the sound in that area. However, that also means the sound has no hint of being honky or hard or harsh, ever.

FR of the Stax 009 drivers in 007 Mk2 housing and pads, no front grills, no dust screen. Soundstage is like nearfield, a bit closer to the ear, lively, expressive, not bright, a near-perfect monitor experience. You can see the FR is not much different from the stock 009 from below, but boy it sounds different indeed. I can hear it's the same driver, but in a much better presentation, no treble hash/fatigue, perhaps a bit forward in the mids but in a nice BBC monitor way. However, I don't know if the 007 housing is the best for the 009 drivers - I would think a bigger wooden enclosure might be even better.

FR
Stax 009 drivers in 007 Mk2 housing - FR.jpg

CSD.
Below you can see some slight hash in the upper frequencies, contributes to the perceived forwardness of the sound, but blends well.
Stax 009 drivers in 007 Mk2 housing - CSD.jpg

Spectrogram (forgive the hash in the left, my measurement error).
This is best when uniform - you can see very few and only slight disruptions. A nice, coherent sound. A bit of forwardness around 500 Hz which might disappear with different pads.
Stax 009 drivers in 007 Mk2 housing - spectrogram.jpg

Distortion. No problems here.
Stax 009 drivers in 007 Mk2 housing - distortion.jpg

Comparison below between my modded 007 Mk1 (yellow), 009 (red) and the "009 drivers in 007 housing" (turquoise). Despite the nearly identical measurements, they sound pretty different.
Stax 007 mk1 - 009 - 007in009.jpg

Comparison below of my stock Stax 009 (red), Phenomenon Libratum 3 with my pads (green) and Focal Utopia (blue), levels set apart for less overlapping.
Despite the similar FR, they sounded quite different again. IMHO the spectrogram gives most intuitive picture about their sound.
You might think the Libratum might sound bright, but not the slightest way - actually the Utopia somehow sounds brighter or harder than both the 009 and Libratum, but that might depend on the amplification as well. Anyway, the Utopia is among the best measuring headphones ever, and that's a good starting point.
My personal favorite remains the Libratum 3 with my pads, but the 007 mk2 drivers in the 009 housing are nearly the same experience, some might like them even more. They both love tube amps, but sounded excellent from the Sirius amp, too.

009-utopia-libratum-fr.jpg

What I would be really interested in are the 007 Mk1 drivers in the 009 or SR-Omega housing. :).
Thanks @thinker for these experiments.

A repeated conclusion of mine is that don't overestimate the importance of measurements. One can hear far more differences with a trained ear than with measurements. However, the latter should be good enough - good measurements are a necessary, but not sufficient condition. Sounding good is also a necessary, but not sufficient condition :), but better compromise than the former (looking at you, Stax 009 :) ).
 
Last edited:
Jun 26, 2022 at 6:04 PM Post #22,602 of 25,656
007 Mk1 drivers in the 009 or SR-Omega housing.
The 007Mk1 in the Omega shell is one of the best sounding headphones. If I remember correctly Spritzer favorite headphone is the 007Mk1 in the Omega shell.
Its crazy that the 007Mk1, Mk1 in the Omega shell and 007A are just amazing Staxs Estats.

Hopefully, Staxs releases a 007Mk3 or a X7000 or a spiritual successor to the MK1
 
Jun 27, 2022 at 8:05 AM Post #22,603 of 25,656
The 007Mk1 in the Omega shell is one of the best sounding headphones. If I remember correctly Spritzer favorite headphone is the 007Mk1 in the Omega shell.
Its crazy that the 007Mk1, Mk1 in the Omega shell and 007A are just amazing Staxs Estats.

Hopefully, Staxs releases a 007Mk3 or a X7000 or a spiritual successor to the MK1


Thinking if I can do MK1 driver in es1a housing.

I have some spare drivers of MK1, maybe could ask es1alab to make this.
 
Jun 27, 2022 at 10:26 AM Post #22,604 of 25,656
Thinking if I can do MK1 driver in es1a housing.

I have some spare drivers of MK1, maybe could ask es1alab to make this.

I'm assuming you've heard both? The es-1a is pretty dark in it's own right. Would be a bit worried about the sound being too dark with the combination, but not sure if it's mainly the drivers or how much the housing affects this.

--------

I think I would be more open to DIY mashups if I had backup pairs lying around. I really enjoy how distinct the 009, 007 and x9000 all are from one another, although that also contributes to the polarizing nature of the conversations on here lol. In any event, it's cool to see the customizations.
 
Jun 27, 2022 at 10:56 AM Post #22,605 of 25,656
Apart from the setup possibilities, the housing provides the back and front metallic grills, which might have different air resistance, hence tuning, than the original housing.
The 007 Mk1 and Mk2 tunings are pretty difficult to improve IMHO to strike a better balance, but they might both benefit from a little less air resistance in the back. Might sound "more free" (less constricted), especially in highs and mids, but deep bass response might suffer - as with all grill changes, and front opening size changes. These changes work better with larger drivers (e.g. 009) since they have more headroom, but depends on the drivers. One needs to calculate the driver loading, don't just place drivers opportunistically in various enclosures. Of course, try/experiment is always a method :).
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top