I have been following the Gadget discussion from the beginning and can accept that lowered tuning could well be a subjective improvement for some (many?) pieces of music. But like MarkF786 I am still having a problem understanding the premise described in Grover's paper that somehow the relationship between the notes are changed. Much earlier in the thread Mike made a comment along the lines (I think?) that one of the key features of the Gadget is not that it just changes the pitch, but that it retains the timing. ie a 5 min track remains 5 mins long. (and of course does not sound like 'ass'
)
Here is a thought experiment. Record a great 5 min piece of piano music on a reel to reel tape machine. Use the tape speed fine tuning adjustment to then slow the capstan motor by 2.15%. Play the tape back. It will now be playing with C=256. The piece will now be 6 seconds longer. I cannot see how the harmonic relationships of the notes, chords and harmonics will be any different although perhaps the lowered tone may be more pleasant. What am I missing? (obviously something as I have great faith in Mike) Aside from the slightly slower pace of the piece, will this be achieving the same pitch change that the Gadget performs?
I am an amateur muso and mechanical engineer so I have a basic understanding of the maths involved with equal temperament and how it is a compromise to spread the inharmonicity across each octave.
I really wish I could hear it for myself but down under is a long way from the Shiitter. I guess I will have to wait for the production model and try it for myself.
Mike, Happy New Year to you too! Way back at the beginning of the thread you opened up about your early experiences in Audio (and the Peruvian jungle
) which I really enjoyed. I'd love to hear more on your early experiences in the digital realm and I'm sure other members would too. We have much to learn.