Justin Uthadude
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- May 26, 2009
- Posts
- 652
- Likes
- 14
It seems everyday I see a post or article that basically says, “I can hear the difference between 75 bit/500 teraherz sound compared to redbook cd’s.” Basically implying they hear well above 22000hz and the rest of us are missing something. I’m not chasing that rabbit.
What I’m wondering is where are those people when it comes to video? How come they’re not stating that we need videos at 700 frames per second because the current videos are too jittery? After all, video is motion pictures right? Discreet sampled pictures (or rasters) played/refreshed fast enough to fool the brain into seeing it as continuous movement. Kinda digital like. Is there not a corresponding sampling rate that fools the ear, or are there people with dog ears and brains faster than the speed of sound and redbook just isn’t fast enough to fool them?
Does this make any sense, or is my sampling rate set too low?
.
What I’m wondering is where are those people when it comes to video? How come they’re not stating that we need videos at 700 frames per second because the current videos are too jittery? After all, video is motion pictures right? Discreet sampled pictures (or rasters) played/refreshed fast enough to fool the brain into seeing it as continuous movement. Kinda digital like. Is there not a corresponding sampling rate that fools the ear, or are there people with dog ears and brains faster than the speed of sound and redbook just isn’t fast enough to fool them?
Does this make any sense, or is my sampling rate set too low?
.