fittlo
New Head-Fier
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2006
- Posts
- 21
- Likes
- 0
For price/performance concerns the newer Buffalo WHR-G125 would be a very good choice. According to the dd-wrt wiki its the cheapest router that supports their firmware.
According to DD-WRT, all of the routers mentioned in this thread so far (aside from the netgear) are broadcom based. The whr-g125 uses a newer broadcom based chipset and is set to run higher clockspeeds out of the box. The router is cheaper and would seem to indicate that it would have better performance ie managing connections more efficiently due to its higher clockspeed. It also has the same memory configurations as the other options.
http://www.dd-wrt.com/wiki/index.php/Supported_Devices
I picked up the Buffalo WHR-HP-G54 for its range to split internet costs with my neighbors. For my purposes, it was a significant improvement over my old WRT54G v3.1 especially when large amounts of connections were involved (torrents) and new wireless clients joined (neighbors).
Oh, this is all assuming that these routers are flashed with dd-wrt.
According to DD-WRT, all of the routers mentioned in this thread so far (aside from the netgear) are broadcom based. The whr-g125 uses a newer broadcom based chipset and is set to run higher clockspeeds out of the box. The router is cheaper and would seem to indicate that it would have better performance ie managing connections more efficiently due to its higher clockspeed. It also has the same memory configurations as the other options.
http://www.dd-wrt.com/wiki/index.php/Supported_Devices
I picked up the Buffalo WHR-HP-G54 for its range to split internet costs with my neighbors. For my purposes, it was a significant improvement over my old WRT54G v3.1 especially when large amounts of connections were involved (torrents) and new wireless clients joined (neighbors).
Oh, this is all assuming that these routers are flashed with dd-wrt.