el_monkey
100+ Head-Fier
AgreeGet the 800 S. The bass is stronger and the treble spike is gone. They're amazing cans.
AgreeGet the 800 S. The bass is stronger and the treble spike is gone. They're amazing cans.
That is fine. I had some issues with the 109 too.but where gone after a longer listening seasson (burn in?) Now i can't stop using themI resist comparisons - and try to avoid ‘raining on other people’s parades’ - but I must say from my experience there is no contest - the AKG812 are in another league of sonic refinement - detail retrieval is better (and the Meze are good). the upper end on the 812 is more extended and again - more refined. I found the 109 pro too bright - and I like energetic treble. The 812 are more balanced and integrated - across the frequencies spectrum. I tried to make friends with the Meze - had them for a couple of months from a friend. But they are popular - and I know I’m in a minority.
I have the HD800s - I respectfully disagree. The AKG812 present a superior bass (quantity and quality). Neither HP have any issues with treble / sibilance etc - but this is very subjective.Agree
They were very well burnt in. There are various things I don’t like about them. But like I said - I’m not saying my experience discounts yours.That is fine. I had some issues with the 109 too.but where gone after a longer listening seasson (burn in?) Now i can't stop using them
Have to agree the AKG are even more refined, layering and sound staging IMHO is better delineated. If not for the inaugural bum review by TH which every Tom, Dick and Happy regurgitated without ever having tried them, there may have been an illustrious competition going with the HD800/S... much like the HD600 and K701s had before them.I have the HD800s - I respectfully disagree. The AKG812 present a superior bass (quantity and quality). Neither HP have any issues with treble / sibilance etc - but this is very subjective.
I have the 872 as well - and these introduce a bit more of the bass frequency - even without the foam disc.Yes, the K812 definitely was not Tylls darling — no wonder given his preference for a warmer sound signature. I always liked them for their space, resolution and energy, but they could have used a bit more bass for my taste.
While the HD800S was ok for me, I always found the K812 to be more engaging. And easier to drive as well.
That’s why I sold my K812 some time ago and kept the K872. Although I hardly use it anymore I have to admitI have the 872 as well - and these introduce a bit more of the bass frequency - even without the foam disc.
And because come across slightly less analyticalI have the 872 as well - and these introduce a bit more of the bass frequency
DittoThat’s why I sold my K812 some time ago and kept the K872.
I've been in the same boat but with recent Composer coming out I've been listening more.Although I hardly use it anymore I have to admit
And besides T.H.'s review which overall was rather positive this young lad (TH minion?, believe we're allowed derogatory comments on Youtube reviewers) is rather irritating and condescending in his delivery and catered, I believe, to the younger crowd hiding in the basements, so that didn't help.Yes, the K812 definitely was not Tylls darling — no wonder given his preference for a warmer sound signature.
And besides T.H.'s review which overall was rather positive this young lad (TH minion?, believe we're allowed derogatory comments on Youtube reviewers) is rather irritating and condescending in his delivery and catered, I believe, to the younger crowd hiding in the basements, so that didn't help.
Not too sure how he got around to reviewing headphones? Sorry.
Tyll was a very good reviewer and miss them, although we didn't see eye to eye I could reference his reviews in a much more confident manner.I think Tyll was always transparent in what his preferences are and how they influence reviews
Sadly not too many are able or want to read anymore, forget writing altogether, and sadly I'm not just referring to the younger generations.I ignore everything that only appears on YouTube, without a text version… consider it just a waste of time.
Don't!Therefore I’m sorry I won’t wade through the two videos
That describes my relation with Tylls reviews as well: I did not share his preferences in all details, but he was very consistent, so I could apply my offsets to get to a valuable interpretation anyway. Still miss him, including his stance on sponsoring.Tyll was a very good reviewer and miss them, although we didn't see eye to eye I could reference his reviews in a much more confident manner.
Sadly not too many are able or want to read anymore, forget writing altogether, and sadly I'm not just referring to the younger generations.