Review Of The Tin HiFi T2 Mark II​

Introduction​

For a very long time, audiophiles have been drawn to Tin Hifi, a Chinese firm that specializes in electro-acoustic equipment. This is primarily because Tin Hifi was one of the first companies to let audiophiles on a tight budget experience hi-fi sound production. Since their founding, they have released the T, P, and C series and dabbled in planars and dynamic driver technology. Up until now, the IEM T2 has been a highly well-liked and highly recommended IEM due to its excellent sound quality. and has made available several of its upgrades, such the T2 Pro, T2 Plus, T2 Eva, etc. The Tin Hifi T2 Mark II is the most recent version that they released, and I was fortunate enough to obtain one. I want to make a few things clear before assessing.

Disclaimer​

Specification​

Two dynamic drivers operate in a dual driver configuration inside the T2. The tweeter, a 6mm dynamic driver, and the woofer, a 10mm dynamic driver, are arranged in a coaxial configuration. Compared to its predecessor, this generation of shells has a more snail-like appearance. Lightweight aluminum makes up the shell body, and the faceplate is ventilated to elicit a particular reaction. With the provided ear tips or my own, the isolated fit fit and felt comfortable. The included cable has the same feel as the ones that came with the earlier models. On one end of the cable are mmcx connectors, while on the other is a 3.5mm straight termination plug. Three pairs of eartips in various sizes and a pair of foam eartips round out the other accessories that are supplied. Regarding the technical specifications, the sensitivity is 102dB and the range of the frequency response is 12 Hz to 40 kHz.

Sound​

The moment I heard the T2, I knew that this successor of the T2 line is tuned in a more complex manner than any others of its predecessors. The sound is emphases on the treble and upper mid range which brigs more clarity and details with accurate notes attacks but lesser pleasant sound, which in overall sense sounds analytical. The predecessors did sounded fuller and brought more of an appealing sound whereas this kind of tuning is feasible for critical listeners or treble lovers. I think this new direction which Tin Hifi deemed to follow is a double edged sword, this bright neutral tuning with great hold on technicalities sounds somewhat intriguing yet I still believe there is more to what it offers. Let’s delve deep into what kind of sound it offers.

Treble​

Mid Range​

Bass​

Technical Performance​

Comparatively T2 sounds better than other sets around its price range, specifically the imaging and speed. To be honest it is not the best in technicalities but the clear and detailed response it gives regardless of how weak it sounds in terms of tonal balance, makes it a good technical IEM. Let’s talk more in details.

Soundstage, Sound Imaging & Separation​

Speed & Resolution​

Sound Impressions​

Sources​

Sony WM1A - pairing the T2 with the WM1A sounded better in terms of aggressive nature in the upper extension and lower extensions as well. It sounds as if bass came back to life with sub bass impactful presence. Also the mid range sounds forward and the notes feel more weighty and the treble sounds tamed with a better smoothened extension. Ultimately sounding richer, more natural and less offensive. The pairing of the WM1A and T2 sounds perfect.

Tempotec V6 - while pairing with the V6, the response is as energetic as it can be with better distinction of notes and sharp and edgy details of the notes. The treble feels as aggressive as ever whereas the mid range feels more forward. The response as a whole feels like only vocals or less complex tracks would sound tasteful.

Tracks Used​

Conclusion​

To end this review, one thing I was made sure of is that the OG t2’s in house sound is living in the new T2 Mark II but in a more aggressive and energetic way. This time treble heads will fall in love with it as for me it sounds lesser of what I prefer but usually when it came to critical listening, this IEM did help me a lot. The overall presentation of the T2 is bright neutral with sub bass roll off. I’d recommend T2 only to those who wants a clear sounding IEM with lesser bass interference or who loves treble and clarity.

Review OF The Simgot EA1000​

Introduction​

SIMGOT has never launched an IEM that was not highly accepted or commended sufficiently for their sound quality for the price they're being offered, whether it be the EA500, EM6L, or any other of their high end or budget IEMs. One of the earliest businesses in the audiophile sector is reputed to be this Chinese enterprise. They were formerly well-known for their EN series, but they have recently resurfaced and launched a few IEMs that audiophiles like me have found to be rather pleasing. I have been interested in this company ever since I heard about their EN series, and since then, I have grown to love their products and the technology they actually uncover with perseverance, hard work, and dedication. Other than SIMGOT, I don't believe I have ever seen a company that is as open about the creation and application of their technology in their goods, which makes sense. It has taken some time, but I was fortunate enough to obtain their most recent model, the EA1000, which is a younger sibling of the EA2000 that has the same technology. I would like to make a few clarifications before sharing my actual findings.

Disclaimer​

Specification​

The dynamic driver of the EA1000 is a 10mm driver with a multilayer sputter-deposition purple-gold diaphragm and a 6mm passive radiator. This configuration is unique to the EA1000. Using the previously mentioned SDPGD technology, the dynamic driver is essentially a second generation dual magnet and dual cavity driver. Its older brother, the EA2000, has the same configuration. Compared to comparable metal-made IEMs, the shells made of premium alloy metal that has been CNC etched feel more robustly constructed. The SIMGOT brand emblem is centered over a white background in a stunning pattern on the faceplate. The eartips allow for an isolated fit, thus the shells' comfort and fit let you to listen for hours on end without experiencing any pain or weariness. The included cable has a higher texture quality and feel than the one that comes with the EA500. The cable contains a 3.5mm straight termination plug on one end and a two pin connection on the other. Three different tuning nozzles, a carrying case, six pairs of eartips in varying sizes, and a variety of red and black rings for tuning nozzles are among the additional accessories that come with the IEM. Regarding the technical details, the sensitivity is 127dB and the impedance is 16 Ohms. There is a 20Hz–20kHz effective frequency response.

Sound​

The EA1000 exhibits a common sound profile with vibrant, well-detailed, and resolved notes presented with the most precise note presentation I have ever heard from a single DD, yet it leans toward three distinct tunings. Although I am aware that there are passive radiators that help with the notes' natural reproduction and dynamic quality, I still think the dynamic driver is the most amazing. As I indicated, there are three distinct tunings that may be accomplished with three distinct tuning nozzles, enabling the tuning of two in-house targets as well as a 2019 harman target. For my part, I don't see any appreciable differences between the harman and their golden 2023 target—discussed later. Coming to the sound, I am using the standard tuning nozzles (black ringed nozzle) which they came with for more intricate findings. Regarding the sound, for more complex discoveries, I am utilizing the standard tuning nozzles (black ringed nozzles) that were included.The vocals and instruments from the lower mid range to the upper frequencies have a very vibrant and clear response that comes across as joyful and detailed, while the treble sounds pleasantly expansive, airy, and non-fatiguing.The bass feels accurate, slamming, and banging because to the excellent PR that was employed.Even though this is my first IEM to use a dynamic driver and a decent passive radiator, the tuning and sound quality really amazed me. It still amazes me that a single DD can produce a presentation with such forward-thinking, natural sounding quality and exceptional technical ability. Let's examine the sound presentation in more detail.

Treble​

Mid Range​

Bass​

Technical Performance​

In technical terms, IEMs in this price range sound better on average. Quintet, for instance, has a nicely detailed response with good separation and resolution, but it still lacks sharp imaging. I suppose this is because it introduced sibilance or shouty response. However, after hearing about so many IEMs that were unable to achieve what I believed, all of my concerns were allayed by the EA1000, which exceeded my expectations. Let's get specific.

Soundstage, Sound Imaging & Separation​

Speed & Resolution​

Sound Impressions​

Tuning Nozzles​

Red Ringed Nozzle - As opposed to the black nozzles, the only complaint I had with the EA1000 was that the "ss" sound was muted, which resulted in a more balanced sound with more male vocal presence and less intensity from the female vocals.Apart from this, I don't see any discernible changes.

Gold Nozzle - The response sounded a little more weighted and the notes sounded denser when compared to the other two tuning nozzles. This helped the vocals sound a little more grounded and beautifully presented, especially the female vocals, but the spark that usually gave the vocals an exciting touch that kept me on edge was gone. However, nothing seems updated or different—only the note weight and density are highlighted. However, I do occasionally think the treble seems a little muted.

Sources​

Sony WM1A - The response sounded larger and more expansive with a more dynamic response when listening to the EA1000 with WM1A. The vocals, especially the female vocals, seemed a little shouty, even if the notes were more rounded. This was probably around the 2-4k range. However, the bass was louder and more thumping. The calmed energy overall, particularly in the treble region, was the only other discernible difference aside from this.

Tempotec V6 - The response was smoother and cleaner while listening to the EA1000 through the V6, but it also sounded more intimate and lively. The energy was regulated because it prevented any focus from being heard in the mix. The details were as they were, but because they weren't as obvious, they were less noticeable. While the voices sounded less open and separated, allowing the response to sound more relaxed, the bass felt more in control and linear.

Tracks Used​

Conclusion​

To sum up this review, the EA1000 far exceeded my expectations and lived up to the fanfare that audiophiles had for it. Nothing stands out as being particularly incorrect or distinctive from what any audiophile would find pleasing at first hearing. Its opulent feel and sound profile make it the ideal IEM for around $500. Vocal aficionados would adore the EA1000 for its deep and satisfying response that captivates your listening style. I wholeheartedly suggest it because of the response, which sounds as close to a faithful response as possible. Investing $1,000 USD is not necessary to experience TOTL level sound quality; the EA1000 will do the trick.

Review Of The CCA Rhapsody ​

Introduction​

Chinese company CCA has impressed many audiophiles with their high-quality and affordable products since their debut. However, I have only tried one of their products before which is CCA CRA, and now I got the opportunity to test their latest model: the Rhapsody. I was curious to see what CCA had to offer, as I have heard a lot of praise for their IEMs. The Rhapsody is a 2DD+4BA hybrid IEM with a 4-stage switch design. In this review, I will explore whether the Rhapsody can live up to the high standards that CCA has set for themselves. Yet, prior to that, I have to specify some details.

Disclaimer​

Specification​

The CCA Rhapsody is a 2DD+4BA hybrid IEM that employs a dual dynamic driver configuration for the low and mid frequencies, and four balanced armature units for the high and ultra-high frequencies. The dynamic drivers are 8mm in diameter and have a composite diaphragm, while the balanced armature units are 31736 models from Knowles. The frequency division technology ensures a smooth and coherent crossover between the drivers, resulting in a balanced and detailed sound signature. The frequency response range is 20-40000 Hz, the sensitivity is 102 dB, and the impedance varies from 15 Ohms to 20 Ohms. The total harmonic distortion is less than 0.5% at 1 kHz. The earpieces are made of metal and have a 3D printed cavity, which enhances the acoustic performance and the comfort. The earphones also feature a 4-stage switch design, which allows the user to adjust the frequency bands and the tuning styles according to their preferences. The earphones come with a detachable silver-plated copper cable, which has a 3.5 mm plug and a 0.75 mm two-pin connector. The cable length is 1.2 meters and the cable has a dual-braid design to prevent tangling. The earphones also come with six pairs of eartips in two different styles and three sizes.

Sound​

I did try a lot of CCA products, but at first I wasn't interested in them. Then, the CRA came along and became my favorite CCA IEM after that. I never wavered in my interest in CCA, and now I realize how stupid I was. When I heard, I knew this was the best CCA IEM I had ever heard. The Rhapsody is possibly the best IEM I have heard at this price point. It is certainly among the best. Nowhere did I feel that anything was anything other than precisely what I liked—balanced with a clear midrange and subbass emphasis—and if I thought that wasn't enough, the tuning switches helped me remain enthralled with the IEM. I'm grateful to CCA for providing a high-quality IEM at such a reasonable price. The switches are really helpful, I assure you. I believe the technical aspects seem reasonable given the price they are being offered at. Allow me to elaborate on why.

Treble​

Mid Range​

Bass​

Technical Performance​

Regarding the technical performance, I believe it is comparable to other products in this price range. Allow me to elaborate.

Soundstage, Sound Imaging & Separation​

Speed & Resolution​

Sound Impressions ​

Tuning Switches​

Sources​

Sony WM1A - Using the WM1A to listen, I could hear a much cleaner, smoother response with better stage and separation. Although the treble energy was a little muted, the sound was still more expansive and open. The emphasis on the mid range made the vocals in the mix more powerful. Also, there seemed to be more depth to the bass. All in all, the sound was smoothed and softer.

Tempotec V6 - When using the V6, the response sounded more lively, particularly in the treble range, where the normally gentle and seamless response started to sound a little forward. A lively and captivating sound was created overall with this response, which made the details feel more in-your-face and the bass response feel more tactile and prominent.

Tracks​

Conclusion​

To sum up this review, I'll be frank and say that the best-sounding IEM for under $40 should be purchased by anyone with that kind of money. Every frequency range—treble, midrange, and bass—is adjusted to suit the preferences of the majority of listeners. With a well-balanced sound and a bass that can be adjusted, it creates a smooth, coherent response with just the right amount of detail to keep you interested. The CCA Rhapsody was fantastic, and I heartily suggest these.

Review OF The Simgot EM6L​

Introduction​

I have personally known SIMGOT since their early days, when they released the En series, which I loved, but eventually they lost relevance in the audiophile market. However, they made a comeback in 2022 with the release of the EA2000 and EA500, which were warmly welcomed by us audiophiles and quickly rose to the top of the rankings. Later, they released even more reasonably priced sets, the EW100p and EW200, which are also well-liked by many. The EA1000, an economical variant of the EA2000, and the EM6L, their third multi-driver hybrid IEM, were just released. I had the good fortune to obtain EM6L for review; however, allow me to make a few clarifications first.

Disclaimer​

Specification​

EM6L features with a multiple driver configuration consisting of 1 dynamic driver and 4 balanced armatures. Eight millimeter high polymer dual cavity dynamic drivers handle low to mid-frequency frequencies; two custom BAs handle mid-high frequencies; and the final two custom BAs handle high-ultra high frequencies. A three-way filter circuit multiple channel sound damping tuning system, housed in a three-dimensional printed shell, connects each driver. The faceplate that is used is made of metal, and the shells are made of resin. Although the shells are heavy, they fit perfectly and are comfortable to wear, even for extended periods of time. The high purity oxygen free copper silver plated cable that is included with the EM6L has a 3.5mm straight termination plug on one end and a two pin (QDC type) connection on the other. In addition to the IEMs and the cable, the following accessories are included: three pairs of eartips and a carrying case. Regarding the technical details, the sensitivity is 119dB and the impedance is 26 Ohms. The range of the frequency response is 20 Hz–20 kHz.

Sound​

Whether it was the EA500, EW200, or even the EW100P, the quality and tuning at the price they were offered at truly made them a steal, as the tuning typically leans toward a neutral sound with a sub bass boost response—my preferred listening style. Given that it lacks dynamics and has a flat response, I think this is the pinnacle of what a neutral with sub bass boost tuning actually is. It is more sophisticated, detailed, and enjoyable to listen to because of the conclusive and understandable response. It maintains a relatively open and airy presence while not favoring any one area over another. I mean, after listening to the Nova and the Chopin, I couldn't find any characteristics that were as well-resolved and clear. Yes, there are certain restrictions; these include the BA timbre and dynamics, but more about those later. Allow me to elaborate on the EM6L's sound.

Treble​

Mid Range​

Bass​

Technical Performance​

At the price these are being offered at, I firmly believe that no IEM has greater technical capability than the EM6L. It sounds great, regardless of the resolution or the specifics. In actuality, I think the imaging and details are superior to the Chopin, and the stage and resolution are superior to the Nova. Let's go into more detail.

Soundstage, Sound Imaging & Separation​

Speed & Resolution​

Sound Impressions​

Sources​

Sony WM1A -while using my WM1A to listen to EM6L That was such a lovely, melodic response that I was speechless. The notes had a more lively, realistic physical quality. While the notes' slender quality wasn't completely eradicated, it was sufficiently diminished to yield a more organic and natural response. The bass guitar plucking began to sound more meaty, and the bass felt bigger and more quantified. In the end, the higher frequencies seemed more subdued in the treble or mid range, with a better stage response, more relaxed and tonally superior vocals, and more rounded rather than sharp instrument notes.

Tempotec V6 - Rich with energy, the response felt largely the same as I had previously mentioned, with the exception that it was a little bit more cohesive and smoother, allowing for a less leaner sound. The response, in my opinion, felt a little too warm.

Tracks Used​

Conclusion​

In conclusion, I would like to say that I have a lot of appreciation for the EM6L because of its extremely refined and tactile response, which never permits any unpleasant noises and produces an impressively detailed and resolving response for an IEM in this price range. Of course, the response is not as dynamic as other IEMs, but the tuning it offers reveals better than any IEM I have heard, even above its price range. The quality that SIMGOT provides consistently leaves you feeling more than satisfied. Of course, those who prefer a neutral with sub bass boost response can get this; however, I strongly suggest the EA1000 by SIMGOT to those who lean more toward a musical IEM.

Review Of The KZ PR3​

Introduction​

KZ, short for Knowledge Zenith, is a Chinese brand that specializes in affordable and innovative audio products. With their diverse offerings, ranging from single to multiple driver configurations, KZ has already carved a niche in the budget and mid-tier market. They have catered to various customer needs and preferences with their well-designed IEMs, which are praised for their value and quality. KZ has come back with a new IEM, the PR3, which is their latest planar model. Before I dive into the review of the PR3, I would like to mention a few points first.

Disclaimer​

Specification​

KZ PR3 has a 13.2mm planar diaphragm driver that can handle a wide range of frequencies, from 20 to 40000 Hz . The earpieces are made of metal and they look pretty classy. They have the KZ logo on the front, and they're a bit bigger than usual. But don't worry, they're comfy to wear, especially with the memory foam eartips. Unlike PR2 it really has an open back design with vents above the shells. The cable is also nice, it's silver-plated and detachable, so you can swap it if you want. The cable is 1.2 meters long, and it has a 3.5 mm plug and a 0.75 mm two-pin connector. The earphones come with six pairs of eartips, so you can choose the ones that fit you best. The KZ PR3 has some impressive specs, like a sensitivity of 98 dB and an impedance of 15 Ohms. The sound is clear and lively, with fast and accurate transients and lots of details . The distortion is very low, less than 0.5% at 1 kHz.

Sound​

Initially, I believed that the response from PR3 was the same as that from PR2, which was PR3's collaborative predecessor between KZ and HBB. However, after some time and from various sources, I was positive that they had a different sound that was nearly identical to what the first listeners had heard. Planar IEMs are primarily known for their differences in quality, which are primarily found in the higher frequencies. These differences also affect how lower frequencies act and support the entire response. To put it plainly, it feels more like the side grade or a specially tuned version of PR2, not a replacement for the PR2. The response is fairly bright-neutral with sub bass boost, which makes it a preferred target of mine and to be honest I like it a lot. However, whether it is better than the PR2 is a different story. Let's talk more in-depth about the sound of the PR3.

Treble​

Mid Range​

Bass​

Technical Performance​

​

Soundstage, Sound Imaging & Separation​

Speed & Resolution​

Sound Impressions ​

Sources​

Sony WM1A - The PR3 seemed to sound a little more subdued in the higher frequencies and a little more substantial in the bass range when I was listening with the WM1A, which contributed to the response sounding more dynamic. There was a slight improvement in the tonal response.

Tempotec V6 - The PR3 seemed more bodied in the midrange and more crisp and sibilant in the treble when I was listening with the V6. There was an increase in the bass's strength and impact, which gave the music life. As a result, I believe the response finally became animated and enthusiastic. The vocals did sound more realistic and were closer to your face. However, the sibilant in the treble range somewhat detracted from the atmosphere, even though the tracks were only moderately bright and focused mostly on female vocals.

Tracks​

Conclusion​

To sum up this review, the PR3 feels, as I previously indicated, more like a side grave or a special edition of PR2 with some minor tuning adjustments. For treble lovers who like their higher frequencies to be crisp and sparkling, the IEM is definitely for them. I find the response to be bright, neutral, and full of bass; I firmly believe that this is not recommended for people who detest treble, such as the PR2. If you already own PR2, you don't need to upgrade to PR3. The KZ PR3 is the only IEM I would suggest if you want more treble energy and technical advancements.

Review Of The Kiwi Ears Forteza​

Introduction​

Disclaimer​

Specification​

Sound​

Most people will think the sound is tuned in a V shape, but from what I could hear, it's actually more of a neutral sound with a lot of bass—pretty much the most controlled and physical sound I've heard in this price range. The FR graph displays an extremely extreme graph with a lot of bass and eccentric energy in the lower treble and upper mid range. The lower treble region is more prominent in the overall mix, which kind of overshadows the upper extension where I find it takes the hit. If it had better extension, though, it would have been the most practical IEM because the sound and tuning bring a unique sound in this price range and the presentation is lively, fun, and detailed all at once, which I have never experienced like this on any other IEM except Forteza. So, to be honest, neither of the regions brings anything extreme to my ears. This IEM offers far more than sound compared to others in this price range, and it's a sight to behold. But not everything is sunshine and cookies; in fact, there are instances where I find the Forteza to sound extremely artificial or tinny, which I will go into more detail about later.

Treble​

Mid Range​

Bass​

Technical Performance​

Due to the excessive effort put in by the single BA handling all of the high frequency, the Forteza's technical performance is not the best, but it is still better than average. Of course, the clarity and details are superb, but the separation and resolution might not be the best at this price point. Let's talk about this in more detail.

Soundstage, Sound Imaging & Separation​

Speed & Resolution​

Sound Impressions ​

Sources​

Sony WM1A - The Forteza and WM1A combination produces softer, more calming sounds that are better for the ears and mind. The bass has become more subdued in the mix, while the higher frequencies have been turned down a notch. The increased space on stage facilitates the presentation of other subtleties and allows for note separation. The best part is that, although there are occasional offensive nuances in the presentation, it is lessened overall.

Tempotec V6 - The combination of Forteza and V6 sounds the best because it produces a more powerful response that keeps me alert. The response is livelier and more energetic. In addition to the bass being more noticeable and the treble being equally effective, the midrange also sounds higher overall. The offensive sounds are only occasionally audible, despite the fact that the response is clearer and the lower mid range is less approachable in the mix. There is a greater tactical and pronounced response overall. Overall, I think this pairing is the best.

Tracks​

Conclusion​

Review Of The 7Hz x Crinacle Zero 2​

Introduction​

7Hz, a Chinese company well-known for its full range planar IEM Timeless, is a prominent player in the audiophile market. Their sub-brand, Salnotes, is particularly well-known. This is the company with whom I fell in love with planar technology for the first time. Salnotes made a name for itself with the release of their first IEM, the Zero, which received high marks from audiophiles and was dubbed one of the best under $20. Along with salnotes releases, I also found 7hz releases to be pleasing to my taste and the quality they offer. Recently, the parent company 7Hz released the improved version of the original Salnotes Zero, dubbed the Zero 2. This was a joint project between 7Hz and renowned audiophile reviewer Crinacle, and I had the good fortune to review them. However, I want to make a few points clear before continuing.

Disclaimer​

Specification​

Zero 2 used the same 10mm single dynamic driver arrangement as the previous generation, with the exception that the coil and diaphragm are made of higher-quality material in the driver. Perhaps the driver as a whole is different; I was unable to obtain all the information. Although the shell is composed of the same plastic resin as the previous generation, it looks better than the pastel color before set on the previous generation because it is transparent and has a lighter shade. The faceplate is made of the same metal as the one from the prior model. Wearing the shells is comfortable and doesn't make you tired, but after listening to them for hours, the inside of your ears started to hurt. The cable is described as an improved version of the previous generation and is a high purity OFC cable with silver plating. One end of the cable has a straight 3.5mm plug, while the other has two pin connectors. Six pairs of eartips in three different sizes are among the additional accessories. Regarding the technical details, the impedance measures 32 ohms. The frequency response spans from 10 Hz to 20 kHz, with less than 1 percent of total harmonic distortion.

Sound​

Similar to the Ziigaat Nuo, which I recently reviewed, the Zero 2's sound quality is far superior as an all-around IEM. Even though there are many competitors in this price range, I think the response has been better than with the previous releases because as these audiphile IEMs become more user-friendly, more people tend to become interested, which is, in my opinion, the correct course of action. Apart from its position in the market, Zero sounds much better than Zero, which was also well-received, though some users wanted more, and their voices were heard. Salnotes/7Hz performed an excellent job of tuning into a somewhat gentle V-shape that is captivating to listen to. The dynamic driver allows the Zero 2 to produce a more dynamic and refined sound while producing details that are similar to those of Nuo. Let's talk about the sound in more detail.

Treble​

Mid Range​

Bass​

Technical Performance​

With the exception of superior imaging and more audible details in the mix, the technical performance is comparable to that of the Nuo. Let's talk about this in more detail.

Soundstage, Sound Imaging & Separation​

Speed & Resolution​

Sound Impressions ​

Sources​

Sony WM1A - Using the WM1A, I discovered that Zero 2 had a more mature and laid-back sound. This was achieved by reducing the intensity of the high frequencies, allowing the warmth of the mid-bass to permeate and create a more organic tone while preserving the accuracy of the details. The sound got wider and more energizing to listen to. This pairing really appeals to me.

Tempotec V6 - The V6 produced a clearer, more detailed sound when listening to Zero 2. The treble seemed more invigorating, which resulted in a more focused response and the addition of harsh noises to the mix. The bass had a better sense of control and texture, which improved the perception of the instruments' sound.

Musehifi M4 - With the exception of the response not being overly analytical, the Zero 2 and M4 pairing was more rich and full-sounding, with good dynamics in the lower notes and appropriate energy, allowing for a more consistent sound with the same representation as the V6. The lower mid range was a little elevated, perhaps as a result of the muted higher frequency or the push from the M4, even though I did find that the vocals were more pronounced in the mix and never had a chance to come through. This sound type appeals to me.

Tracks​

Conclusion​

To sum up this review, the Zero 2 is an incredible ultra budget IEM that improved upon the shortcomings of the Zero by bringing a better sound profile. One of the IEMs that has recently raised the bar in the ultra budget market is the Ziigaat Nuo, and Zero 2 has followed suit. A combination of playful and analytical sounds makes Zero 2 a worthwhile endeavor. Zero 2 is highly recommended by me.

Review Of The Muse HiFi M4​

Introduction​

Disclaimer​

Specification​

The DAP comes with a USB C data cable

Design And Aesthetics​

Usage ​

I listened to M4 both with and without a wire, but I believe I used the bluetooth most of the time. Nevertheless, I had convenience in my pocket whether I used it wirelessly or connected. However, some people may find that its larger size interferes with their daily routine. Generally speaking, I like things that are portable. overall use, with a reliable battery backup and quality control for minor deterioration. It is excellent in my opinion as a wireless source. I think wired use has its benefits, but because of my routine, I rarely sit down and take my time, so I mostly use wireless.

Sound Impressions ​

IEMs​

Thieaudio Monarch MKII

Monarch MKII is the foundation from where I start recognising other IEMs. For me the Monarch MKII has the perfect treble, mid range and bass. I may prefer more punchy bass though, but all in all close to what I find in an IEM. The treble is extensive and exceptionally smooth for my taste. The mid range is centric and very expressive and the bass goes deep and rumbles beautifully. The bass feels lacking slam but it is there, but I love the way it is. In my opinion, these are technical monster, as the stage is expansive and realistic with great depth and acting dimensions. The imaging may have been more edgy and sharp but it is enough to sound clean and crisp. The separation is really how distant and distinctive every element should be. The attack and decay resolves at a pace I find natural and real. All in all I find it to sound perfect with superb tonality and excellent technicalities. Monarch MKII still surprises me how both technical and tonal performances blend and compliments each other. A peaceful and relaxed play. No other sources were able to alter or change the sound of this IEM except for the mid range which either became subdued or very revealing, the sound felt the same except for warm sources or very transparent ones like the WM1A and Questyle M15.

Because of the M4, Monarch MKII sounds more engaging and expressive. It also allows the bass to have more authority and boosts the vocals. I think the reaction is felt almost exactly as I experienced the pairing of HYPE2. However, I thought that the bass was mixed in much too much, which detracted from the stage, separation, and imaging that the Monarch MKII is praised for. Though it's not worse, I wasn't quite fond of it. Tracks with emphasized higher frequencies and light bass notes, however, sounded blissful. Every minute of the vocal presentation was amazing.

Thieaudio Hype2

The hype2 is an IEM with a natural sound that completely outperforms IEMs in this price range in terms of tonality, sound imaging, separation, and resolution. The sound is fuller and richer, and the imaging and separation make it easy to listen to vocals, particularly female vocals. It is hypnotic to listen to because it is easy to distinguish between the various vocalists or the vocal layering. The Hype2 is a very capable IEM because I never noticed any changes in tone or quality missing from the response from any of my sources, including the Sony WM1A, Tempotec V6, or other sources I had the chance to listen to like the RU7, BTR7, or Astell & Kern Khan Max. It is only when the vocals are slightly provoked or subdued using sources that there is a slight difference, but that is mostly what I heard while listening. The Hype2 is one of the top IEMs in this price range in my opinion, and it can layer and image just as well as the Monarch MKII.

Although it sounds like a mild-shape tuning, the Hype's more vocal-forward sound allows for a more open sounding. When paired with the M4, the more vocal-forward sound brought about a balanced sound, but at the expense of filling the space and making the sound seem less spacious. By all means, the tone remained the same, but the mids and bass had more energy. I noticed a more aggressive approach where the response seemed to be a blended mix of overjoyed notes with a strong vocal presence, and the details felt better. I should also mention that the bass spreads out and becomes more noticeable.

Thor Mjolnir MKII

Mjolnir is a very bassy set which has a lot of sub bass emphasis. The treble and upper mid range is also very forward in the mix. The upper treble has great extension as well. The bass is very punchy and boomy while acting fast. Mjolnir is a great V-shape sounding IEM with a different approach to explosive bass that has better technicalities, especially in this price range. The stage is great with nice surround stage and depth where the separation of each element sounding distant enough them to procure space to breathe and distinct themselves. The attack and decay of the driver capability is really quick and performs great. The vocals may feel lean and sparkly, the warmth or the fuller experience is something that these lack. Th bass response does vary from sources to sources whether I listen to a warm source or a neutral one, the bass becomes either overwhelming or authoritative or both.

M4 somewhat tames the energy in the upper mid range and lower treble and brings about a more expansive stage, which helps it sound balanced yet forward with mid range and relaxed in the lower treble, even though the Mjolnir MKII is a spacious sounding IEM. While the response seems to have been through a filter, as evidenced by the off-key backgrounds, I find that the response also provokes vocals while maintaining a realistic timbre, which is why I find it to be somewhat likeable.

Binary X Gizaudio Chopin

The bass is incredibly good with proper note weight and tends to cut off at around 200–300 Hz, which makes the lower mid range sound more cleaner but less warmer. Nevertheless, the lifted mid bass presence in the mix adds just the right amount of warmth to the overall mix. The Chopin's sound is really polished and has a great neutral response that tends to produce refined lower notes. With the exception of the notes' lack of expressiveness or detail, it probably has one of the most pleasing tones, making it sound more calming than the Moondrop Variations. The quality is still on par with other products like Variations, and it does stand a strong chance against the Truthear Nova.

When I listened to Chopin on the M4, I noticed that the bass felt natural with the same control as the treble, and the sound was forward with emphasis in the mid range where the vocals had a distinctive presentation that felt expressive but a little less natural. The mid range and the tempered placement of the instruments and vocals—all of which were stuck to the left and right stereo walls—were the most obvious, in my opinion, even though the details were notably better. Thus, the pairing wasn't my favorite.

Truthear Nova

Therefore, when I first heard Chopin, I thought it was more technically advanced than the Nova. This led me to compare the two pieces side by side and realized that while both had their own charm, I actually preferred the Nova. However, I also gained the necessary distinctions between the two so that I could determine which is better for whom. In other words, the Nova has a tighter grasp of the overall mix and is more neutral and bass linear than the Chopin, which has much more detailed and cohesive elements. Chopin seems more fluid and at ease in contrast, with a sharper treble and clearer notes that produce a more analytical sound. The vocals in the mid range are more forceful and vibrant, and the instrument sounds clear and distinct. Overall, I think this response is less calming and more lean than the Chopin.

Other than the fact that the response felt more staggering and as detailed as before, there weren't many differences in the sound response when the M4 and Nova were paired together. The bass felt more punchy and thumpy, and the vocals seemed to add some sibilance. The energy in the treble felt a little muted. I think this combination is better than V6.

7Hz x Crinacle Zero 2

In addition to sounding somewhat V-shaped and taking a more aggressive stance in the higher frequencies—which I think gives it a playful vibe—the Zero 2 is also exceptionally well-tuned, incredibly resolving, and exceptionally refined for an IEM at this price point. Whatever source I selected, it had a clear, pleasant sound with a lively response; the WM1A, in particular, gave it a more expansive, well-balanced IEM sound. When compared to other IEMs in this price range, the technical capabilities of this one are actually very impressive, to the point where I find them meaningless. With any source, I think Zero 2 generates a positive response.

With the exception of the response not being overly analytical, the Zero 2 and M4 pairing was more rich and full-sounding, with good dynamics in the lower notes and appropriate energy, allowing for a more consistent sound with the same representation as the V6. The lower mid range was a little elevated, perhaps as a result of the muted higher frequency or the push from the M4, even though I did find that the vocals were more pronounced in the mix and never had a chance to come through. This sound type appeals to me.

Tracks​

Conclusion​

Review Of The Binary x Gizaudio Chopin

Introduction​

Disclaimer​

*Since this unit tour was organised by the lovely people at HiFiGo, I am grateful to them. And as I've said in all of my evaluations, the same is true for this one: all of the concepts I've expressed below are entirely my own, original ideas that haven't been influenced by anyone else. If interested, go to this link.
*I am not associated with the connection, and I receive no financial assistance from anyone.
*For the remainder of the review, I will refer to these IEMs as “Chopin.”
*I am using different Ear-tips for convenience and better versatility.
*Finally, I will only evaluate the Chopin based on their performance, even though I will explain how it feels and seems physically and aesthetically.

Specification​

Chopin has a hybrid design with a dynamic driver and three balanced armature drivers. The 8mm ceramic dynamic driver handles the bass, the following balanced armature handles the mids, and the two customised high frequency balanced armatures handle the highs. The shell's distinctive design is created in resin and features faceplates made of stainless steel. The brand and company names are engraved on the faceplates. Despite the shells' unusual shape, they are easy to put in ears and don't hurt at first, but with continued use, they do start to hurt.The cable is a high purity OFC silver plated litz cable with a two pin connection at one end and a 4.4mm straight plug at the other. The quality of the cable feels more akin to that of KZ or CCA companies, but it feels light and tangled due to its memory vulnerability.A carrying case, six pairs of eartips in two types and three sizes, and pouches for each iem are among the additional accessories included with the iems and cable. Regarding the technical details, the sensitivity is 122dB and the impedance is 12 Ohms. With a total harmonic distortion of less than 1% at 1kHz, the frequency response spans from 20 Hz to 20 kHz.

Sound​

Treble​

Mid Range​

Bass​

Technical Performance​

Regarding technical performance, I think it ranks among the best available after Nova for IEMs with multiple drivers or hybrid configurations. The reason is that, in my opinion, Nova's sound is more transparent here, whereas Chopin's sound is a little more rounded and smoothed than precise or sharp. Let's talk about this in more detail.

Soundstage, Sound Imaging & Separation​

Speed & Resolution​

Sound Impressions ​

Sources​

Sony WM1A - When WM1A is paired with Chopin, the response is more subdued; in other words, the sound is less overbearing where the vocals are better placed and sound more elegant and beautiful. Additionally, as the space and airiness increase, a better separation and smoother, more melodious sound are introduced, making the music more reassuring to listen to while maintaining the same level of detail and accuracy in the notes. The physicality of instruments like drums and bass guitars felt more realistic as they were hit and plucked, and the bass felt more dynamically close to the body. Overall, the sound seemed more organic. It is a truly remarkable pairing of Chopin and WM1A.

Tempotec V6 - When the V6 was paired with the Chopin, the bass was more prominent and powerful from the outset, the midrange was more expansive and somewhat spaced out, which also applied to the treble region, and overall the response was more expressive and stimulating, making for an immersive and thrilling sound. The combination sounded good.

Musehifi M4 - While listening Chopin with the M4, I found that the sound was forward with emphasis in the mid range where the vocals had a unique presentation where it felt expressive yet a little less natural I mean, but other than that the bass felt organic with the same control and the treble being the same as well. The most I felt noticeable was the mid range and the placement of instruments and vocals being tempered as all of them have been stick both on left and right stereo wall yet the details were noticeably improved. So I didn’t prefer the pairing.

Tracks​

Conclusion​

In conclusion, I believe that Chopin occupies a very competitive market, much like the ultra budget sector, with the exception that audiophiles like us would prefer to wager on a redeemed IEM. Whether someone wants details or just a pleasant sounding experience, this IEM will fulfill their needs and desires. I think Chopin is highly valued and has a soothing, detailed sound.The Chopin addresses each and every one of them. It offers a similar but distinct sound to the market, making it, in my opinion, a very intriguing competitor to the Nova. Therefore, yes, I heartily recommend the Chopin since it will alter your perception of sound, something that TOTL IEMs seldom do.

Review Of The Hidizs MP145​

Introduction​

Disclaimer​

Specification​

A 14.5mm planar magnetic driver is incorporated in the MP145. The aluminum shells include a faceplate patterned after a whale's tail with Rorqual pleats. The fit and isolation of the shells themselves are excellent, but they are a bit tacky to keep in place. Longer usage periods throughout my tests were a bit difficult for me because I felt uneasy due to its heavy weight. The four-strand, high-purity, single-crystal OFC cable that comes with this IEM is 1.2 mm long, with a two-pin connection on one end, and terminates in a straight 3.5 mm plug. In addition, there are three high-pneumatic sound tuning filters, nine pairs of eartips, and a storage bag. Regarding the technical details, the sensitivity is 104dB and the impedance is 30 Ohms. The range of the frequency response is 20 Hz to 40 kHz.

Sound

The sound quality of a full range planar IEM was introduced by timeless which showed the capability of a driver which can also be tonally correct and which made it a stepping stone for other IEM manufacturers to follow on, but as soon as the other IEMs got involved various sound tuning were established, ultimately expanding the horizon of what a planar can do. The MP145 is a new timeless around this time which I find thoroughly improved not only in tonality but in technical performances as well. The MP145 clearly swoop the board and established a new benchmark, specifically for the IEMs around this price. Coming to the core of the MP145, The sound is very close to LETSHUOER S12 but with better control on the response in the upper mid range and lower treble producing a tamed yet with improved details in sound. Basically the whole hit frequency spectrum follows the S12 with a better contrast in sound and technical performance but I won’t say it is a S12 killer, the reason being that the bass has a unique role to play and that is the introduction of the tuning nozzles which I will discuss about later on. Let’s dive deep into the sound and talk in detail.

Treble​

Mid Range​

Bass​

Technical Performance​

I don’t that there is any full range Planar IEM incapable of impeccable technical perfomacne, with that said I believe that the MP145 is technically very resolving. If it is the imaging or details or separation or speed, I think that the MP145 rules all the other Planar IEMS out there, of course I believe not that I am arguing. The quality of details and the way the notes presented has really improved from the previous generation of the planar IEMs. The transient and clear response make it a very technical IEM yet the wet response is a downer for me but can’t be helped though. Let’s discuss more in details.

Soundstage, Sound Imaging & Separation​

Speed & Resolution​

Sound Impressions ​

Tuning Filters​

Sources​

Sony WM1A - listening MP145 with the WM1A, the pairing with the standard tuning nozzles sounded vast and clear and more enhanced in dynamic response. While I found that MP145 with red nozzles weren’t a good pairing from my perspective as the sound subdued in terms of vocals and instruments sounding dull and lifeless. The clarity felt more intriguing as there was a sense of natural response but wasn’t coming out clearly though the sounding such made it sound really smooth and expressive which felt like the best pairing.

Tempotec V6 - while listening MP145 with the V6, the energy held within MP145 feels exploited and makes it sound more transparent in the response while not correcting or disrupting the response. Although the metallic timbre is audibly a nuance when hearing high energy complex tracks or bright tracks. Though the quality of notes is refined and basically correct in expressing clarity. The derived observation is after examining all the tuning nozzles, but I were to point out, the pairing MP145 with red nozzles screwed on pairs perfectly with the V6.

Tracks​

Conclusion​

To end this review, as I mentioned that a new benchmark has been set with the introduction of MP145, I find it sound improved and challenging enough to bring other full range Planar IEMs around this price to their knees with such intricate details and level of clarity while maintaining the composure and integrity of the notes is blissfully interesting to listen to. The more I listen to it, the more I find it enthralling to listen to, hence I wholeheartedly recommend the MP145 to anyone who wants to upgrade from their older sets of Planers.

Review Of The Kinera Freya 2.0​

Introduction​

I've just recently tested products from Kinera or its subsidiary brand Celest, which I find to be the most satisfactory.It reminds me of Kinera, yet I firmly think that sincere effort pays off when one works hard.This Chinese firm has a large fan base of audiophiles who enjoy their products, whether they are their exquisite cables or their exquisite IEMs, which, although they may not seem useful, are actually quite useful.Already, their IDUN 2.0, Nannas, and Nannas 2.1 have satisfied me. Once more, I had the honor of reviewing their most recent product, the Kinera Freya 2.0, a distinctive update to the stunning IEM Freya. But first, I'd want to make certain disclosures before we move forward.

Disclaimer​

*Since this unit was sent by the kindful people at Kinera, I am grateful to them. And as I've said in all of my evaluations, the same is true for this one: all of the concepts I've expressed below are entirely my own, original ideas that haven't been influenced by anyone else. If interested, visit this link.
*I am not associated with the connection, and I receive no financial assistance from anyone.
*For the remainder of the review, I will refer to these IEMs as “Freya.”
*I am using different Ear-tips for convenience and better versatility.
*Finally, I will only evaluate the Freya based on their performance, even though I will explain how it feels and seems physically and aesthetically.

Specification​

Three balanced armatures plus a dynamic driver make up the multi-driver arrangement housed in the Freya. The three balanced armature drivers are Knowles balanced armatures, and the dynamic driver in use is a 7mm tailored driver. As previously mentioned, the shells have an incredibly beautiful appearance. The transparent body of the shell is complemented by a faceplate that has a cool, collected blue hue with glittery patches to add even more sparkle. The shells feel incredibly light and small in the hands, making them among my most comfortable recent purchases. No weariness or uneasiness is felt after listening to it for extended periods of time, indicating that the isolation is good and the fit and comfort are ideal. The 16 core/7 strand gold plated copper Litz cable that is included with the IEMs includes an interchangeable 3.5mm and 4.4mm connector on one end and a two pin connection on the other. Five pairs of final type e eartips, three pairs of K-07 balanced eartips, three pairs of 221 voice eartips, a cleaning tool, and a matching travel box are among the other accessories included in the set. Regarding the technical details, the sensitivity is 105dB and the impedance is 20 Ohms. The range of the frequency response is 20 Hz–20 kHz.

Sound​

The Freya's sound is a genuine V-shape tuning that mimics the Kinera's house sound. This tuning is done with consideration for the lower treble, a highly revealing upper mid range, and a well-controlled and clear bass. It's one of the greatest quality assurances I've heard of for this price range; it's straightforward, well-detailed, and entertaining. It's not like the king in any price range, and it doesn't seem like it wants to be, but I think Kinera is catering to those who enjoy a V-shaped sound and their fans, who are their devotees. The freya partially fits my preference as an audiophile who likes a neutral sound with a sub bass boost sound signature, which is why I find them to be interesting, illuminating, and fun to listen to. IEMs in this price range that I have tested include Quintet, Yvain, Flacon Pro, and many more, and I can tell that this one has a distinct sound than those. Either the midrange or the treble sounds better in some situations. Thus, let us ascertain in further depth.

Treble​

Mid Range​

Bass​

Technical Performance​

It's either the best or the worst, but to be honest, I think its technical abilities are mediocre because the sound is neither excellent nor terrible, as far as I'm concerned. The soundstage appears to be kind of big, yet the image is among the best available, etc. When I contrast it with other sets, such as Performer 5 or Quintet, I see that each one has varying degrees of technical proficiency, with one being strong in certain areas and the other strong in others. Let's talk about this in greater depth.

Soundstage, Sound Imaging & Separation​

Speed & Resolution​

Sound Impressions ​

Sources​

Sony WM1A - The first thing I noticed when listening to the WM1A was that the white noise was audible, like I was listening to a record. As I turned up the level, I also heard a ticking sound at each bar. Perhaps this is a problem specific to my device, as I didn't experience this when using the V6. Even yet, the similar sound did aid in the tuning, giving it a more relaxed and fluid tone. In the same way that the instruments brought forth more tonally rich notes, the vocals seemed less forceful or lean. There was not the occasional perceptible sibilance. For someone like myself who favors a neutral with sub bass boost tuning like the Freya, the bass sounded powerful, and the entire presentation added a sense of air in the mix. I adore how well it pairs with my WM1A.

Tempotec V6 - When paired with the V6, the freya's vitality reverberates with it, enhancing the mix's clarity and transcperancy. The sound becomes crisper and clearer, resulting in a more expressive presentation. The vocals seem more open and free of clustering as the mid range is more noticeable than the bass, which also aids in the separation. The punchiness of the bass is heavier than the thumps and is more controlled. The craftsmanship is reassuring to me when combined with the V6.

Tracks​

Conclusion​

Review Of The Ziigaat Cinno​

Introduction​

Having acknowledged the excellence of Ziigaat's ultra-cheap IEM, the Nuo, I can only be eager to see what their other premiere IEM has to offer. With their IEM Nuo, the recently founded Chinese company Ziigaat can clearly hold its own in this market. However, I'd like to see how well they do with their more expensive set, the Cinno, which fortunately I was able to obtain for review. Before I do that, though, let me make a few clarifications.

Disclaimer​

Specification​

Cinno is an IEM with multiple drivers built to house one dynamic driver and four balance armatures. The other drivers are two in-house manufactured ultra high BA and two mid-high BA drivers, while the dynamic driver is a 10mm LCP dynamic driver. The brand name is inscribed on the faceplate of the shell, which is composed entirely of gray resin and has the same refined, understated appearance as the Nuo. Even after listening for extended periods of time, the lightweight, well sealed shells remain comfortable within the ears and cause no fatigue. The high grade, well-made cable that comes with the IEM includes a 3.5mm straight termination socket on one end and a two-pin connection on the other. The kit also includes three pairs of eartips in various sizes in addition to the cable and IEM. Regarding the technical details, the sensitivity is 107dB and the impedance is 32 Ohms. At 1 kHz, the overall harmonic distortion is less than 0.5%, and the frequency response spans from 20 Hz to 20 kHz.

Sound​

For the price it is being sold at, the Cinno is an IEM that is specially tuned; it has a response that is unquestionably warm-neutral, sufficient details, and a consistent presentation throughout the mix. The higher frequencies sound silky smooth and have a nice degree of presence, while the new tuning gives the bass a solid focus without being overdone. Though the sound generated by SA6 MK2 is obviously considerably more detailed and technical, the physicality of the bass makes the presentation sound more real. If I were to compare how presentations feel, I would say they are somewhat like SA6 MK2 with the bass turned on. The bass response feels warm but not engulfing or influencing with its hits; to be honest, I found it to sound too smooth and relaxed, but such a response does satisfy me with its vivid and cohesive presentation. The treble is usually different from what I have heard before, feeling somewhat subdued with the presence of the mid range to bring a fuller experience. Let's examine more closely and determine specifics.

Treble​

Mid Range​

Bass​

Technical Performance​

Technically speaking, the Cinno performs on par with the 41T by Juzear and the SR5 by Soundrhyme, which I have both heard and evaluated. It appears that Cinno is quite similar to the SR5 in terms of tonal performance, but in terms of technical specifications, I believe Cinno is somewhat closer to what SR5 sounds like. Its relaxed reaction makes me believe that it is on par with other IEMs at this price range, if not better. Let's get into further depth.

Soundstage, Sound Imaging & Separation​

Speed & Resolution​

Sound Impressions ​

Sources​

Sony WM1A - using the WM1A for listening. When heard via Cinno, one experiences a feeling of depth and expansion. It is more expansive and far-reaching, which enables people to bring out the entire reaction while maintaining an airy, light, and naturally occurring tone. Sincerely, I don't detect any discernible BA tone in the mix, which is really helpful for such a well-composed and flawless response. The answer is dispersed, which makes the IEM stand out more.

Tempotec V6 - When playing the V6, the Cinno sounds more forward-thinking and expressive, giving it an almost frenetic tone. The bass feels more in control, the voices are more forward-leaning, and the treble has a more noticeable presence, especially in the lower treble. The same roomy sound has a superior feeling of separation and clarity.

Tracks​

Conclusion​

Review Of The Ziigaat Nuo ​

Introduction​

I recently learned about Ziigaat as an entity, a recently founded Chinese business, when I learned about their debut IEMs in the ultra-budget and budget market segments. Usually, all I know about something is what it represents and their message, which is as follows: Our basic values—ZiiGaat, which stands for "Zero-in on Ideas, Innovate, Grow, and Achieve All Together"—are the source of the name. Whatever your musical taste, level of audiophilia, or use case, we are dedicated to providing audio solutions that meet your demands. It's really very amazing how this new company is aiming to establish its image while competing in the already fiercely competitive budget market. Fortunately, I have firsthand experience with their ultra-budget IEM, the Nuo, so I can verify whether or not they mean what they claim. However, before we get started, let me make a few clarifications.

Disclaimer​

Specification​

Utilizing powerful neodymium magnets, Neo houses an in-house constructed 10mm LCP dynamic driver. The faceplate is composed of metal, and the shells are all black with a black tint. The faceplate is printed with the IEM name and the brand name in white, giving it a polished and minimalist appearance. The shells are made of high-quality plastic. Owing to its small size and design, it fit and felt quite comfortable, never making me feel tired even after lengthy listening sessions. Perhaps the finest cable I have used in this price range is the black, attractive, and well-feeling cord that comes with the IEM. The cable has a 3.5mm straight termination connector on one end and a two pin connection on the other. The accessories in the box also include three pairs of eartips in various sizes. Regarding the technical details, the sensitivity is 107dB and the impedance is 32 Ohms. At 1 kHz, the overall harmonic distortion is less than 0.5%, and the frequency response spans from 20 Hz to 20 kHz.

Sound​

Nuo has a sound that is both balanced and V-shaped, which I think has the potential to be utilized with an LCP driver because of the sound's quality and technical ability, which is impressive considering the price they are being provided for. In addition to sounding expansive and airy at higher frequencies, the representation of the sound is incredibly natural and smooth, with organic and forceful notes impacting on the lower notes that contribute to a more genuine tone. The presentation is quite enticing, with both the vocals and the instruments having a somewhat Wan'er-esque quality, but with greater details and provocative voices that some felt fell short of expectations. Regardless of how the graph appears, the tuning is novel for the market and, in my opinion, a welcome departure from the neutral and lean character of previous IEMs such as Zero or CHU. Neo, in my opinion, has the ability to satisfy the need for a budget-friendly set that sounds almost as good as what an audiophile like myself desires. Let's delve more into the audio and examine it in greater depth.

Treble​

Mid Range​

Bass​

Technical Performance​

Regarding the technical performance, I think it strikes a good mix between the imaging and clarity and a stage and imaging that feels better than anything I have heard in this price range. Even while I still think the CHU performs better than the reaction it produces, I consider the quality of the notes at such a high cost to be an insignificant outcome. I shall give my findings because, while I could be mistaken, individuals who choose budgetary IEMs prioritize tone above price. This is mostly due to the affordability of these IEMs.

Soundstage, Sound Imaging & Separation​

Speed & Resolution​

Sound Impressions ​

Sources​

Sony WM1A - When Nuo and WM1A are combined, the result is a more calming and pleasant reaction that, when the intricacies are preserved, makes the response more natural and rounded. The warmth spills over the upper frequencies, calming the intensity and assisting the notes in bringing an impactful response that greatly contributes to the expansive sound. I think the WM1A combination works better in comparison because of the bass response, which is more coherent but still loose.

Tempotec V6 - Using my V6, I was able to listen to Nuo and saw that the response was more forceful and detailed, allowing the mid range to be more forward-looking with more control over theta response. However, the response often gives the notes, especially in the upper mid and lower treble ranges, a lean character. The expressiveness emerges, yet there don't seem to be many details at all, giving the reaction a more lively tone.

Tracks​

Conclusion​

Review Of The HiBy R3 II​

Introduction​

I consider myself fortunate to have had the opportunity to try HiBy products, which completely blew me away after seeing both their mid-range and high-end models. Because of my great experiences with their products in terms of quality, it puts me at ease and gives me confidence in them. And today I had the chance to test out the HiBy R3 Gen II, their updated version of the well-received R3. However, before we go any further, I want to share certain details with you.

Disclaimer​

Specification​

The R3 II has two ES9129C DACs, which enable DSD256 and PCM384kHz/32bit/MQA16X outputs via the 3.5mm PO, 4.4mm BAL, and 3.5mm LO analog audio ports.Additionally, it supports the previously mentioned via coaxial digital (via Type-C port) and digital audio ports. The system runs on HiByOS, an internal Linux operating system. The CPU is an X1000E, which I will talk about later and feels fine to use. Additionally, the device supports wireless transfers via Bluetooth Version 5.1 (Two-way), which supports UAT, LDAC, APTX, AAC, SBC, Airplay, DLNA, and HiByLink, and 2.4GHz WiFiHz. It has a 2000mah battery and supports microSD cards up to 2TB. The screen has a 3.2" touchscreen with a resolution of 320 by 480. The audio output's technical specifications are listed below.

Design And Aesthetics​

The R3 II features reinforced glass front and rear plates, as well as an aluminum alloy chassis. There are three color options: red, silver, and black. It weighs 118g and has dimensions of 86.9*60.6*14.5 mm. It is well worth it because of the form factor and weight, as the former is ideal for one-handed use and fits beneath your palm. I used it without a cover for a while even though I kept it in the silicone case, and I had no trouble managing it. Although I had anticipated that the fact that neither port wiggled would be cause for alarm, the volume knob makes me feel insecure about it. I never thought the device was warm or hot, not even after I completely depleted the battery. Approaching the chases with confidence, I can retain any grip and even take a few blows because it's robust and stiff. Therefore, I find the design and aesthetics to be both appealing and eye-catching; nevertheless, I'll talk more about the usefulness of utilizing one later.

Usage ​

I was able to obtain between nine and eleven hours on the 3.5mm and 4.4mm port with my usage. Although it is a matter of taste, I find that holding and using the Shanling M0 and the HiBy R2 II feels significantly better, so the small factor does come in helpful as it is not too small to feel little in comparison to my IEM stack around it. There were moments when I felt uneasy with the volume, as though it could easily come off. The speedy and user-friendly HiBy OS made it easy for me to navigate through all of my songs, but the biggest worry was how long it took me to locate the album I was looking for. Of course, with a device this small, this is unavoidable. I did feel less constrained and more at ease using it as my daily source, but I did think that the experience wasn't quite up to par with what I am used to. I was taken aback when it powered my HD600 with a good 70–80 volume gain, but once more, driving isn't what the cans require—juice, which is conspicuously absent from every DAP I've tried. Therefore, in terms of usability, I think this holds up well to what an audiophile essentially requires.

Sound Impressions ​

IEMs​

Thieaudio Monarch MKII

Monarch MKII is the foundation from where I start recognising other IEMs. For me the Monarch MKII has the perfect treble, mid range and bass. I may prefer more punchy bass though, but all in all close to what I find in an IEM. The treble is extensive and exceptionally smooth for my taste. The mid range is centric and very expressive and the bass goes deep and rumbles beautifully. The bass feels lacking slam but it is there, but I love the way it is. In my opinion, these are technical monster, as the stage is expansive and realistic with great depth and acting dimensions. The imaging may have been more edgy and sharp but it is enough to sound clean and crisp. The separation is really how distant and distinctive every element should be. The attack and decay resolves at a pace I find natural and real. All in all I find it to sound perfect with superb tonality and excellent technicalities. Monarch MKII still surprises me how both technical and tonal performances blend and compliments each other. A peaceful and relaxed play. No other sources were able to alter or change the sound of this IEM except for the mid range which either became subdued or very revealing, the sound felt the same except for warm sources or very transparent ones like the WM1A and Questyle M15.

Upon testing my Monarch MKII with the R3, I was sufficiently assured that there was sufficient power to operate them. Although everything about the presentation felt calm, the details were there. I noticed that the notes were smoother and rounder, which gave the impression that it was wider and more expansive. However, the vocals felt forward, with the instruments supporting them. When I paired the bass with my V6, the Monarch MKII seemed to be lacking a slight oomph. In contrast, the mid bass felt more natural and loose.The stage feels the same as the V6, but the texture and details are just better. However, I think the R3 II's quality and presentation is better because it keeps the details while still making the experience more enjoyable.

Thieaudio Hype2

The hype2 is an IEM with a natural sound that completely outperforms IEMs in this price range in terms of tonality, sound imaging, separation, and resolution. The sound is fuller and richer, and the imaging and separation make it easy to listen to vocals, particularly female vocals. It is hypnotic to listen to because it is easy to distinguish between the various vocalists or the vocal layering. The Hype2 is a very capable IEM because I never noticed any changes in tone or quality missing from the response from any of my sources, including the Sony WM1A, Tempotec V6, or other sources I had the chance to listen to like the RU7, BTR7, or Astell & Kern Khan Max. It is only when the vocals are slightly provoked or subdued using sources that there is a slight difference, but that is mostly what I heard while listening. The Hype2 is one of the top IEMs in this price range in my opinion, and it can layer and image just as well as the Monarch MKII.

In comparison to the V6, I noticed a smoother and more pleasant presentation when I paired the HYPE2. When listening to bass tracks, I noticed a sudden improvement in the bass presentation that made for a more effective exposure. In my testing, I did notice that the treble became softer and a little less technical, but the HYPE2 still had the same clarity over the vocals and instruments. Even so, I would still rather have clarity from my HYPE2 in the higher frequencies than a soothing sound.

Thor Mjolnir MKII

Mjolnir is a very bassy set which has a lot of sub bass emphasis. The treble and upper mid range is also very forward in the mix. The upper treble has great extension as well. The bass is very punchy and boomy while acting fast. Mjolnir is a great V-shape sounding IEM with a different approach to explosive bass that has better technicalities, especially in this price range. The stage is great with nice surround stage and depth where the separation of each element sounding distant enough them to procure space to breathe and distinct themselves. The attack and decay of the driver capability is really quick and performs great. The vocals may feel lean and sparkly, the warmth or the fuller experience is something that these lack. Th bass response does vary from sources to sources whether I listen to a warm source or a neutral one, the bass becomes either overwhelming or authoritative or both.

The Mjolnir didn't sound as good as I had hoped because the treble seemed muted and less detailed than before, and the bass felt bloated, which was powerful but messed up the mid range due to how the stage felt. Even though the bass is strong and boomy with a deep sub bass, I would prefer a more sparkling presentation from the Mjolnir since it highlights the finer details. Even so, the vocals continued to feel direct and unambiguous.

HiBy Yvian

The Yvain is an IEM with a bright sound that leans toward dead neutrality, emphasizing only the lower treble and upper midrange. It is evident that the signature differs from other IEMs in this price range. Even though the sound isn't what I was expecting, the emphasis on the notes' calm and clarity makes these IEMs incredibly fantastic. I have never heard of a bright-neutral IEM that eliminates all distracting or objectionable noises from the mix until now. However, it can occasionally be a bit too much for someone like me who prefers a sub bass boost tuning that is more balanced or neutral. I believe that when it was tuned, placing less emphasis on the sharp notes—whether they are in the treble or the mid range—was the right move. Although it sounds less smooth, it isn't piercing or sharp. Additionally, the bass has a really tight tone and effectively defines itself through exposure.

From a sound quality perspective, the R3 II elevates every region in the mix without producing any distinct energy differences, making the Yvian sound very pleasant throughout. The Yvain sounds tonally comfortable thanks to the tone, which is more smooth than sharp. The pairing sounds clean and linear to me, even though I do think the texture in the details isn't as detailed as I have heard in other DAPs. However, they are also more expensive than R3 II.

Tracks​

Conclusion​

Review Of The HiBy Yvain​

Introduction​

Having used HiBy products for three times already, IEMs and high-end digital audio players from this Chinese manufacturer have made a name for themselves in the audiophile industry. The firm exclusively engages in additional endeavors, such as dongle dacs and amps, in addition to IEMs and DAPs. When I heard about HiBy's flagship IEM and their mid-tier DAPs, which can easily compete with those that are more expensive, I was already very shocked by what the company had to offer in the IEM and DAP markets. This time, I was able to obtain their mid-tier IEM, the Yvain, a 4 BA IEM that they recently released. I will evaluate it when a few things are cleared up.

Disclaimer​

Specification​

The Yvain is an IEM with a balanced armature configuration that is limited to four BA. A three-way crossover system connects the four BA drivers—two customized sonion BAs for the midrange, one Knowles non-damper BA for the woofer, and one Hi-res Knowles BA tweeter for the highs. While the faceplate is constructed of metal with an etched lion pattern on both sides, the shells are ergonomically shaped and composed of medical resin. The IEM seems really beautiful and feels lighter than it does. It fits and feels comfortable enough to provide complete isolation, thus wearing it for extended periods of time wasn't a problem. However, it should be noted that the eartips are the only means of pressure release because there are no ports for it. The 98 branch per side PCOCC Litz balanced cable that comes with the IEM contains four pin-lock adapters, which allow for interchangeable 3.5mm and 4.4mm termination plugs. Six pairs of two types of eartips in three sizes, a cleaning brush, two interchangeable termination plugs (3.5mm and 4.4mm), and a crush and shock-resistant storage bag are among the additional equipment. One thing I notice is that even while using a smartphone, the IEMs are really effective. Regarding the technical details, the sensitivity is 116dB and the impedance is 23 Ohms. At 1kHz, the overall harmonic distortion is 1%, and the frequency response spans from 20Hz to 40kHz.

Sound​

The Yvain is an IEM with a brilliant sound that leans toward dead neutrality, emphasizing only the lower treble and upper midrange. It is evident that the signature differs from other IEMs in this price range. Even if the sound isn't what I was expecting, the emphasis on the notes' calm and clarity makes these IEMs very fantastic. I have never heard of a bright-neutral IEM that eliminates all distracting or objectionable noises from the mix until now. However, it might occasionally be a bit too much for someone like myself who prefers a sub bass boost tuning that is more balanced or neutral. I believe that when it was tuned, placing less focus on the sharp notes—whether they are in the treble or the mid range—was the proper move. Although it sounds less smooth, it isn't piercing or harsh. Additionally, the bass has a particularly tight tone and effectively defines itself with exposure. In addition, since this IEM lacks a pressure release port, I would like to emphasize how important it is to use eartips. I found that using the JVC mushroom eartips allowed me to insert deeper than usual with a perfect seal, but before using the mushroom tips, I used the AZLA Sedna Crystal, which produced a more bright and lean sound. Therefore, I believe that the eartips' dependence causes the sound to get brighter or duller. With that in mind, let's explore the sound in more detail.

Treble​

Mid Range​

Bass​

Technical Performance​

I think that Yvain is a great IEM for those looking for a great revealing and resolving IEM because of its technical performance, which sets it apart from its competitors. All things considered, the imaging and separation are better than average; in fact, all of the features outperform IEMs such as the Quintet or Falcon Pro. Alright, allow me to clarify.

Soundstage, Sound Imaging & Separation​

Speed & Resolution​

Sound Impressions ​

Sources​

Sony WM1A - The WM1A and I found the best combination, with the treble opening up and regaining the same clarity while the stage's extension was greatly increased. As a result, the vocals seemed lighter, more airy, and farther away from your face. The response was pleasing to the ear and not at all what one might have expected. In all honesty, I believe that the Yvain was designed specifically for the WM1A, which is why it sounds better than the original.

Tempotec V6 - The V6's sharper details make the treble more noticeable and expressive, particularly in the upper extension. Whether it's the treble, midrange, or bass, the response is smooth and detailed. The midrange and lower treble in particular seem to be more forwardly presented. The V6 makes better use of the texture and note clarity, but I still feel like there should be more.

HiBy R3 II - From a sound quality perspective, the R3 II elevates every region in the mix without producing any distinct energy differences, making the Yvian sound very pleasant throughout. The Yvain sounds tonally comfortable thanks to the tone, which is more smooth than sharp. The pairing sounds clean and linear to me, even though I do think the texture in the details isn't as detailed as I have heard in other DAPs. However, they are also more expensive than R3 II.

Tracks​

Conclusion​

To sum up this review, I have to say that HiBy did a fantastic job of fine-tuning the Yvain to a perfect neutral IEM that sounds as clear and detailed as possible without producing any unpleasant noises. In fact, I found the pleasant response to be more effective in revealing the numerous other IEM present in the mix, whether they are in the bass, mid range, or treble. I adore that the tuning is neither peaky nor sibilant, and it hardly ever produces a BA timbre. HiBy gets the integration and application of the BA right. As a result, I think I can suggest this IEM to people who like a more brightly tuned, neutral sound with less bass. And watch out, bass lovers: although your craving might not be satisfied, you should still try these out of pure curiosity.

Review Of The Kiwi Ears Melody​

Introduction​

With their numerous releases, such as the Orchestra Lite, Cadenza, Quintet, etc.—whether in a single driver configuration or multiple ones—China-based Kiwi Ears has already established a dominant presence in the budget and mid-tier market. They have revealed every conceivable scenario to accommodate a wide range of customer preferences and tastes. They have established themselves with their well-liked IEMs, which are well-regarded for both their price and quality. Kiwi Ears has returned with new IEMs, the Melody being their first planar model. Although I am fortunate enough to review the melody, I would like to address a few points first.

Disclaimer​

Specification​

Melody uses a 12mm in-house developed full range planar magnetic driver configuration. While the faceplate is made of metal, the shell is composed of medical resin. The company's name is printed on the faceplate above both of the shells, which are smaller than they appear. Because of its ergonomic design, the shells fit comfortably, and listening to it for extended periods of time did not cause any weariness or unease. Although the cable that comes with the IEM is attractive and functional, it has a memory hold problem. The cable is 1.2 meters long, with a 3.5 mm straight termination plug on one end and a two pin connection on the other. Six pairs of eartips in two distinct styles and three sizes are among the additional accessories. Regarding the technical details, the sensitivity is 102dB and the impedance is 18 Ohms. At 1 kHz, the total harmonic distortion is less than 0.5%, and the frequency response spans from 5 Hz to 40 kHz.

Sound​

After hearing the Melody, my concept of a Planar IEM has changed. I never imagined that a planar could have such beautiful sound. Whatever the graph suggests, the melody sounds pleasant and well-balanced, making it easy to listen to. It is not clarity that you would get, but the physicality and advantages of the planar. Its vibrant and round tone belies its quickness and responsiveness, giving it a surprisingly realistic and mature sound. The wet response, which seemed to provide clarity and details but actually leaned the sound toward artificiality, was my only issue with today's planar IEM. Most other IEMs in this price range struggle to produce a soothing sound with subtle nuances, but the presentation succeeds in doing so. Even though it's one of the most affordable planars on the market, it functions similarly to a planar driver and a dynamic driver crossed over. Let us investigate the sound in more detail.

Treble​

Mid Range​

Bass​

Technical Performance​

Regarding technical performance, I would say that planar IEMs are superior, but this one falls short in my opinion, albeit naturally at the expense of being rich and have natural tones. The details, in my opinion, are not fully expressed. But let's talk about this in more detail.

Soundstage, Sound Imaging & Separation​

​

Speed & Resolution​

Sound Impressions ​

Sources​

Sony WM1A - As usual, the sound is smooth, warm, and has more dynamics in the lower frequencies. With the exception of the nuances produced in the higher frequencies as the bell chimes and cymbal crashes sound captivating, the entire presentation sounds denser and richer without sacrificing the quality of the notes or their details. Although I do find the bass to be a little influencing, it sounds a little looser than usual and has no effect on the IEM's integrity of tuning.

Tempotec V6 - More clarity and genuine Planar capabilities are brought out by the V6, which gives Melody a faster, more detailed sound with excellent details. The instruments sound clearer and more forward, but the ss sound is more audible. The vocals sound more forward and distinct. It sounds tighter and more focused with a more nuanced bass. As a result, I prefer the V6's sound.

Tracks​

Conclusion​

To conclude this review, I will acknowledge that this is one of the most reasonably priced Planar IEMs. It also has a unique tuning approach that is well-executed, making it worthwhile to try, especially for people who prefer planers to dynamic drivers because it sounds similar and, in my opinion, has better properties. For that reason, I heartily suggest this IEM to anyone looking to experience a warm, well-balanced planar sound.

Review Of The Tin Hifi C0 (The Elf) ​

Introduction​

Tin Hifi is not a new business; in fact, it is one of the oldest businesses with a cult of audiophiles who follow them. When they released the T-series IEMs like the T2, T3, etc., they had a significant impact on the audiophile market thanks to the high quality they provided at an affordable price. Everyone adored the T2, which is still talked about today. The P-series IEMs, which were the first in the audiophile market and the most accessible planar IEM at the time, were introduced after the T-series even entered the planar driver market. Even after they recently released the C-series IEMs like the C2, C3, and others, the excellence in sound and quality as well as the love for the audiophile never diminished. After establishing the C-series IEMs, this Chinese company recently launched the C0, also known as the Elf, the most affordable IEM in their entire line. Today, I have the privilege of reviewing their IEMs. Although I want to make a few points clear before moving on.

Disclaimer​

Specification​

Each side of the Elf houses a single dynamic driver that is 10mm in diameter and has a brand-new titanium + PU diaphragm for the audiophile market. The shells are made of aerospace-grade aluminum and are shaped like bullets. The shells weigh only about 3.8 grams and have a natural open back design. The shells do feel and look more expensive—better than the price they are being sold at—and in my opinion, they are a better IEM because they have the same tuning as other, more expensive IEMs, which is a welcome change in the market. They felt a little exhausting to use for prolonged listening sessions when installed into ears over the ears style, but they felt fine when I used them straight like a normal earphone, so I still think that different people may have different views on what they find comfortable. Even though I got the 3.5mmversion, which costs 4-5 USD less than the one offered with the DAC chip configured type-c cables. Thanks to the two pin connector, the cable that comes with the IEM is a detachable cable with a 3.5mm straight plug, and it feels acceptable for the price the product is being offered at. The package also contains six pairs of eartips in three different sizes and ear hooks. In terms of the technical details, the sensitivity is 105dB, and the impedance is 32 Ohms. The distortion rate is 3% at 1kHz, and the frequency response ranges from 20Hz to 20kHz.

Sound​

The Elf's sound leans neutral with a sub bass boost presentation; to be more precise, it sounds similar to other models in the same price range that I've heard, but at a lower price. Many IEMs that share the same tuning, such as the Tangzu Wan'er, Moondrop CHU, Salnotes Zero, etc., sound similar. In fact, I would say that the sound is comparable to that of the C2, the line-up's older brother. Since they all have the same tuning, most IEMs sound the same in my opinion, and the main factor that differentiates them is the characteristics of the driver. For example, the Wan'er and Zero have similar tuning, but the Wan'er's low frequencies sound more boomy and thumping than the Zero's, which indicates that the PET driver used in the Wan'er has more power. Now, I typically take into account more than just the sound itself, so the physical aspect is taken into account as well, but that was already mentioned above. Let's return to the sound and talk more specifically about the elf.

Treble​

Mid Range​

Bass​

Technical Performance​

I don't think IEMs in this price range offer the same level of resolve as the IEM above this price segment, and to be completely honest, I rarely notice any differences between IEMs in this range. I would say that the CHU is the most reminiscent in presentation, whereas other IEMs seem to hit or miss in terms of superiority in various characteristics, to better express the idea. Let me elaborate further.

Soundstage, Sound Imaging & Separation​

Speed & Resolution​

Sound Impressions ​

Sources​

Sony WM1A - With such an alluring response—and a concluding one at that—that makes it sound more distinct and proper, I believe the pairing makes me love the Elf more. I think it sounds more pleasant and rich with a more palatable response because of the lower energy in the higher frequency and the balancing out overall regions. I believe I favor this pairing.

Tempotec V6 - The mid range and energy in the mix, especially the vocals, are enhanced by V6. As expected, the presentation sounds crisp and thorough. The treble appears more clear and forward in the mix, while the bass feels better controlled and improved. Although I think the WM1A has more resolving power, I can hear how well the Elf and V6 pair. The Elf felt nice and smooth while responding energetically, which felt forward and interesting.

HiBy R6 Pro II - the R6 Pro II makes it sound more refined and detailed, though one may miss the tonal accuracy when heard, which I typically get better response from most of the other sources. Additionally, the bass has better texture and is cleaner. The middle range was consistent.

Tracks​

Conclusion​

Last but not least, I adored the Tin Hifi C0. The Elf brought back memories of my initial love for the CHU tuning. The Zero, Wan'er, and Chu are all easily exposed by the new king as being the most affordable while sounding comparable to or superior to them, especially in a different form factor. I think everyone should own one because they are the best available and won't break the bank for the price. The Elf comes highly recommended; you'll be pleasantly surprised.

Review Of The Kinera Celest Wyvern Pro​

Introduction​

Since being established more than a year ago, Celest, a sub-brand of Kinera, has focused on providing fans with products of the highest quality at more reasonable prices to meet their needs. Releases like Gumiho, Pandamon, or Phoenixcall have received high praise and recognition for their quality and the way they present themselves. I mean, based on my personal experiences, this Chinese corporation is the friendliest to its clients and supporters. Whether they are cables or IEMs from either the parent or the sub brand, I adore every product they ever offer. Luckily, I was able to get my hands on the Wyvern Pro, a gaming IEM that they recently introduced. However, before we continue with the evaluation of the Wyvern Pro, I would like to clear up a few things.

Disclaimer​

Specification​

A 10mm dynamic driver with a liquid crystal polymer diaphragm is housed in the Wyvern Pro. The shells are made of 3D resin printing, and I think their ergonomic and ear-friendly shapes are faithful to my tests because I experienced no weariness even after using them continuously for 10 hours. The Celest is engraved on the faceplate, which has a silver finish. In terms of the cable, the dual mic version that I received includes a dedicated mic that extends to be close to your mouth for improved feedback. During my testing, both microphones performed flawlessly, however the extended microphone produced audio that was crisper and of higher quality. Although the cable itself feels smooth, it is incredibly soft to the touch. It behaves well and has no consequence that is memory-prone. The detachable microphone is located on one end of the cable, next to the two-pin connector, and an L-shaped 3.5mm termination plug is located on the other end of the cable. The other included accessories are a finely crafted metal bookmark that is a trademark of Celest IEMs as well as two different types of eartips in three different sizes. In terms of the technical details, the sensitivity is 105dB, and the impedance is 32 Ohms. 20Hz to 20kHz is the range of the frequency response.

Sound​

The Wyvern has a delicate and neutral sound, but the details aren't particularly finely tuned, so you won't get the micro contrast you'd normally get from an IEM at this price point. In fact, the amount and quality are astounding for an IEM that costs less than $30. Thus, the sound is essentially more neutral and sub bassy. The treble sounds pleasantly stretched and gives the mix a terrific vitality, even if this might be the mid range's magic. The same is true with the mid range, which is forward and pays close attention to even the smallest nuances. The textures aren't particularly provocative in terms of raising expectations, but they do deliver. When it comes to the bass, it is well-controlled and generates a sizable amount of sub bass. Since the capability uses an LCP diaphragm driver, which I can completely rely on for delivery, I am aware that it is not a ruse. Let's explore the sound more closely.

Treble​

Mid Range​

Bass​

Technical Performance​

Regarding the technical performance, I wouldn't expect an IEM in this price range to operate flawlessly, but it does sound a little better in certain areas while missing in others. Now let's talk.

Soundstage, Sound Imaging & Separation​

Speed & Resolution​

Sound Impressions ​

Tempotec V6 - Although the Wyvern's sound didn't feel particularly sharp or detailed to me when I heard it through V6, the aggressive quality it added made it sound more revealing. The treble seemed the same, but the midrange and bass sounded a touch more subdued than usual. Favorable and less melodious, in my opinion.

HiBy R6 Pro II - the sound felt more neutral and brighter with good exposure in the upper mid range when I paired it with the HiBy R6 Pro II. Even though the notes weren't noticeably clearer and more detailed, the vocals still sounded the same while being more energizing.

Gaming ​

Tracks​

Conclusion​

Review Of The Thieaudio Hype2​

Introduction​

The Chinese company Thieaudio, which produces electroacoustic products with a determination, is well-known and respected in the audiophile community. Particularly their one IEM, the Monarch MKII, is highly regarded and adored by many audiophiles, including me, for being one of the best sounding IEM in the world and costing less than $1,000. I personally own a Monarch MKII, and the truth be told, I am enchanted by the sound quality it produces. I use this IEM as the standard against which to judge other in-ear monitors. Putting aside personal experiences, Thieaudio not only sells IEMs but also gorgeous cables. They recently released the HYPE2, a budget-friendly IEM. Since this is the first in the line, I'm not sure what happened to the HYPE, but today I'll be reviewing this IEM in a unique way because it's a special one. But first, I want to set the facts straight.

Disclaimer​

Specification​

What I think of the sound​

What I like most about the sound, then, is that it is undeniably alluring and has a balanced response that tops any IEM when it comes to striking the ideal balance between tonality and technicalities. It seems as though a 2 BA 2 DD wouldn't be very good at presenting the sound because it is so beautifully done. This dynamic quality of the mix keeps your senses tingling not due to how potent it becomes but rather due to how it flourishes and provides you with a calming experience. This dynamic quality of the mix controls the entire response and creates a fantastic balance between each region.

Although the clarity and details are lacking, it does bring smoothness and fluency to the energy transitions between the treble, midrange, and bass. My personal opinion is that the upper treble is airy and transparent enough to allow for a well-rounded and wholesome response; however, details are another story when compared to IEM like Blessing 3. With a stronger emphasis on clarity and forward response, the lower treble has better energy and allows for better exposure to instruments and vocal high notes, which sound full and organic. The mid range, nothing sounds out of place and everything sounds so harmonious and expressive with great control over the notes, whether it is in the lower mid range or upper mid range. Particularly when I talk about the vocals, the closest explanation could be that they create such an enveloping sound that satisfies every desire you might develop. When it comes to the bass, the sub bass is the main focus, and its extension is very deep and resonant, sounding very dynamic and thunderous, strong, and punchy, while the mid bass blooms well together, making the slams sound impactful, which they do successfully. However, I find it really pleasing that it doesn't interfere with higher frequencies, change the response, or overflow the mix. Although some listeners may perceive the overall response as having a v-shape sound signature due to bass exposure, it is overall a balanced response that is smooth, captivating, and enveloping with a fuller and richer response and no offensive sounds, making it the one to rule them all.

Is it really the "Baby Monarch MKII" ?​

Although many audiophiles have discussed this IEM as being little Monarch MKII or a close replica of the Monarch MKII, this is not what I believe. The thieaudio tuning signature, in my opinion, is a characteristic that is deeply ingrained in both the Monarch MKII and HYPE2, but they don't sound the same. The Monarch MKII's spacious sound gives it a somewhat relaxed tuning and a leaner sound, whereas the HYPE2's sound gives it a slightly aggressive sound with a more full-bodied and rich response that allows the vocals and air to infuse and blend together to produce an overwhelming sound. Compared to the Monarch MKII, the bass is more supportive of the lower notes and better able to pull the lower mid range. Even though the vocals appear to be slightly recessed on the frequency response graph, the HYPE2's presentation puts the vocals more front and center. I guess this is because the treble lacks an expansive response. When I talk about stereo exposure in imaging layering and separation, the characteristic I mentioned earlier appears to be similar. So while Ido think that both IEMs produce a somewhat similar response, I won't refer to the HYPE2 as a "Baby Monarch MKII."

Where does it stand around its competition ?​

Some of the tracks I thought worth mentioning​

(Don’t Fear) The Reaper by Blue Oyster Cult​

Somebody That I Used To Know by Goyte​

SUZUME by RADWIMPS​

Ramta Jodi by Sukhwinder Singh, A. R. Rahman​

The sources I mainly used​

Sony WM1A ​

The vocals had more room to breathe, sounding more staged and composite on the HYPE2. The total response is a really velvety and smooth response. The HYPE2 was also easily powered by the WM1A. The tracks' bass-forward sections sounded more thrilling and resonant because the bass was more dynamic and deep. Any track I heard sounded smoother and more pleasant when I heard it with WM1A, in my experience.

Tempotec V6 ​

HiBy R6 Pro II​

When listening with the Hiby R6 Pro II, the sound wasn't particularly unexpected or different in terms of technical or tonal performances, but that is what I initially perceived. After giving the pair a good deal of listening, I felt that the details were more refined and the energy rose a notch in the mix, which made the stage more satisfying. However, the response was not particularly interesting; I think it is the IEM.In my opinion, the R6 Pro II brings out the true value of this IEM, and in my opinion, this is the response I fell in love with. The correction might not be with the R6 Pro II but with the IEM itself as I already feel the IEM is perfect. It's possible that other sources have manipulated nuances in the mix to make it sound distinctive.

iFi Hipdac​

My last Thoughts​

I would go out of my way to urge everyone to purchase this IEM because, in addition to satisfying your need for a pure, dynamic sound, it will also, and I mean this, gratify whatever need you might have. Everyone will be moved by a reaction that is clear, balanced, and has the ideal balance between tonality and technical execution. The guidelines on how to get the finest sound out of an IEM have been established by HYPE2, and other businesses should abide by them.

The HiBy R6 Pro II​

Introduction​

Disclaimer​

*Since this unit tour was organised by Joe Bloggs, I am very grateful for this opportunity. And as I've said in all of my evaluations, the same is true for this one: all of the concepts I've expressed below are entirely my own, original ideas that haven't been influenced by anyone else. If interested, go to this link.
*I am not associated with the connection, and I receive no financial assistance from anyone.
*For the remainder of the review, I will refer to the DAP as “R6 Pro II.”
*I am using various IEMs and sources for better judgement and versatility.
*Finally, I will only evaluate the R6 Pro II. based on their performance, even though I will explain how it feels and seems physically and aesthetically.

Specification​

Design And Aesthetics​

The R6 Pro II feels substantial and expensive in the hand, but it's a little too big for my own use, especially with a big display. Even though the device is slimmer than typical DAPs, using it one-handedly still feels uncomfortable. Since DAPs are used for audio purposes, in my opinion, they should be more concentrated on producing the best results possible. The R6 Pro does establish this, but I find the device's size to be inconvenient to use. But I'm still amazed by the features. The chases have a toughened glass backplate and are made of aluminum.

Usage ​

​

Sound Impressions ​

IEMs​

Thieaudio Monarch MKII

Monarch MKII is the foundation from where I start recognising other IEMs. For me the Monarch MKII has the perfect treble, mid range and bass. I may prefer more punchy bass though, but all in all close to what I find in an IEM. The treble is extensive and exceptionally smooth for my taste. The mid range is centric and very expressive and the bass goes deep and rumbles beautifully. The bass feels lacking slam but it is there, but I love the way it is. In my opinion, these are technical monster, as the stage is expansive and realistic with great depth and acting dimensions. The imaging may have been more edgy and sharp but it is enough to sound clean and crisp. The separation is really how distant and distinctive every element should be. The attack and decay resolves at a pace I find natural and real. All in all I find it to sound perfect with superb tonality and excellent technicalities. Monarch MKII still surprises me how both technical and tonal performances blend and compliments each other. A peaceful and relaxed play. No other sources were able to alter or change the sound of this IEM except for the mid range which either became subdued or very revealing, the sound felt the same except for warm sources or very transparent ones like the WM1A and Questyle M15.



So I assumed the same with the pairing of both the HiBy R6 Pro II and the Monarch MKII and to an extend I was right but I believe what I was missing was the correct balance between the very revealing vocals or subdued vocals which tempered with the tonal quality was finally found with the R6 Pro II, there was no other changes in the sound but the vocals sounded just right and maybe the bass felt more accurate but other than this revelation nothing was altered or changed.Although the response was unchanged from the Monarch MKII, it sounded better. In my opinion, the R6 Pro II only partially patched the Monarch MKII. Even if I think the reaction is becoming hazy and tedious to listen to since nothing comes across as interesting or expressive enough—or perhaps I was expecting it to—the response is still all one could hope for.

Thieaudio Hype2

The hype2 is an IEM with a natural sound that completely outperforms IEMs in this price range in terms of tonality, sound imaging, separation, and resolution. The sound is fuller and richer, and the imaging and separation make it easy to listen to vocals, particularly female vocals. It is hypnotic to listen to because it is easy to distinguish between the various vocalists or the vocal layering. The Hype2 is a very capable IEM because I never noticed any changes in tone or quality missing from the response from any of my sources, including the Sony WM1A, Tempotec V6, or other sources I had the chance to listen to like the RU7, BTR7, or Astell & Kern Khan Max. It is only when the vocals are slightly provoked or subdued using sources that there is a slight difference, but that is mostly what I heard while listening. The Hype2 is one of the top IEMs in this price range in my opinion, and it can layer and image just as well as the Monarch MKII.



When listening with the Hiby R6 Pro II, the sound wasn't particularly unexpected or different in terms of technical or tonal performances, but that is what I initially perceived. After giving the pair a good deal of listening, I felt that the details were more refined and the energy rose a notch in the mix, which made the stage more satisfying. However, the response was not particularly interesting; I think it is the IEM.In my opinion, the R6 Pro II brings out the true value of this IEM, and in my opinion, this is the response I fell in love with. The correction might not be with the R6 Pro II but with the IEM itself as I already feel the IEM is perfect. It's possible that other sources have manipulated nuances in the mix to make it sound distinctive.

Thor Mjolnir MKII

Mjolnir is a very bassy set which has a lot of sub bass emphasis. The treble and upper mid range is also very forward in the mix. The upper treble has great extension as well. The bass is very punchy and boomy while acting fast. Mjolnir is a great V-shape sounding IEM with a different approach to explosive bass that has better technicalities, especially in this price range. The stage is great with nice surround stage and depth where the separation of each element sounding distant enough them to procure space to breathe and distinct themselves. The attack and decay of the driver capability is really quick and performs great. The vocals may feel lean and sparkly, the warmth or the fuller experience is something that these lack. Th bass response does vary from sources to sources whether I listen to a warm source or a neutral one, the bass becomes either overwhelming or authoritative or both.



I discovered that the Thor Mjolnir MKII sounded very dynamic when paired with the HiBy R6 Pro II, whether it was the bass or the upper frequencies. The response slightly changed, but the excitement level has increased. The bass feels more textured and full of energy, almost to the point of losing control but managing to maintain it. Both the upper midrange and lower treble's upper frequencies sounded more transparent and revealing. The treble was typically a little too much for me when listening to other sources for extended periods of time, but in this particular instance, the effect was lessened when listening to the R6 Pro II. The lower notes' warmth was somewhat lost even though the response turned obedient.

Kinera Wyvern Pro

Wyvern Pro has a great balance of energy in both the upper midrange and lower notes. The sound is strikingly reminiscent of old IEMs like the DUNU Kima and others that used LCP drivers. Because there is a good deal of mid bass and sub bass, the impact can be more punchy and less meaty. The midrange has a forward sound that is expressive and energetic, while the treble is generally clear and detailed but not particularly extended. When taken into account as a gaming set, the Wyvern Pro actually has good sound quality for an IEM. As most other gaming sets aren't that impressive and frequently have very poor quality in terms of their overall response, I am impressed after learning that this can also be used for good audiophile listening, which is essentially killing two birds with one stone. The IEM doesn't really become much more subdued when paired with other sources like the ones I own; instead, the response becomes slightly warmer or more transparent.



Therefore, the sound felt more neutral and brighter with good exposure in the upper mid range when I paired it with the HiBy R6 Pro II. Even though the notes weren't noticeably clearer and more detailed, the vocals still sounded the same while being more energizing.

Tin Hifi C0

The Tin Hifi is a well-balanced set that sounds clean and detailed, especially considering the price. The driver quality is better than that of other IEMs that are or were in this price range, as the C0's response is the same as the CHU's, but the C0 is much more refined in terms of tonal performance while maintaining the CHU's technical performance. The same is true of the Wan'er, which has more subbass but still has better clarity. Every source I tried with the C0 yielded the same results in terms of how the sound felt, which was either smooth, relaxed, and warm with warm sources or tinny metallic with neutral sources.



The same can be said for the HiBy R6 Pro II and Tin Hifi C0 combination, but when it comes to how the sound differs, the R6 Pro II makes it sound more refined and detailed, though one may miss the tonal accuracy when heard, which I typically get better response from most of the other sources. Additionally, the bass has better texture and is cleaner. The middle range was consistent.

Comparisons​

Sony WM1A vs HiBy R6 Pro II

I believe that making a comparison and recognizing which is superior is pointless. Only one's subjective nature can possibly comprehend what I'll say now because sound delivery and quality vary greatly. While the R6 Pro II is a device that produces an accurate and neutral sound that aids in producing accurate responses, the WM1A is a warm source that allows for an expansive and rich response. The R6 Pro II sounds revealing while the WM1A sounds musical in contrast. Although the WM1A still provides a responsive and detailed sound, the R6 Pro II has a more convincing exposure. I came to the conclusion that the R6 Pro II has better amplification after testing a number of IEMs on both sources.

Tracks​

Conclusion​