Reviews by ranfan
EarSonics ONYX (€490)
Configuration
Driver(s): Hybrid 1 DD (Low) x 2 BA (Mid) x 1 BA (High)
Connector: 0.78mm 2-pin (with 3.5mm default plug)
Specification
Impedance: 16.5Ω
Sensitivity: 122dB/mW
Frequency range: 10Hz~20kHz
Model
（1）Matte Black
Accessories
・Silicone tips
・Foam tips
・Double-flange tips
・Cleaning brush
・Carrying case
・User manual
Disclaimer
ONYX was provided by EarSonics as a sample for writing this review. Sound impressions were based on listening with the stock cable and final Type E tips
Packaging
ONYX came packaged in a rectangular all black (including the text) carton box. It is quite a minimalistic presentation, straightforward and hassle-free. The box can also be opened conveniently by unfolding its magnetic binding
Opening the box, inside you can find the ONYX with cable already attached and rolled neatly inside its case
Next to them, on the right lies the rest of the accessories compartmentialized in another black carton box
In it contains all the tips, and one small cleaning brush
Build
Build quality on the ONYX is quite something and remarkable. Starting from the inside, EarSonics confined each driver using their newly-developed Acrylic Heart Technology, uniting them together securely
It then gets encased in a metallic shell that is matte-black in color, with EarSonics initial 'ES' design embossed on each faceplate
The connector is a standard 0.78mm 2-pin sockets. And the silver-colored cable feels light and easy to wear
Despite its heavier size, the monitor sits comfortably on my ear. Though for longer listening periods, it is less so. There wasn't any DD driver flex to be heard on my unit
Sliced View
EarSonics Proprietary Acrylic Heart Technology
Sound
The ONYX has this shallow v-shaped sound signature to it, that is deep and powerful down low, and yet clear well-defined up top. It has good mid-bass emphasis, with the mids slightly warmer more colored
Bass I think is the highlight on the ONYX, as it brings along with it to its presentation this large voluminous bass notes. Its bass doesn't slam too hard, but it makes its presence well-felt with its size and decay, as it has this exceptional mimicry of bass guitars' line vibration
It's quite fast in its attack, and well-kept and controlled as not to bleed overly into the lower-mids, coloring and muddying the sound. The bass also extend and reaches quite deep, however it doesn't rumble too much. It's almost earth-shattering skull-rattling, save for the visceral shaky feel
Bass I hear sounds more on the boosted loose bloomier side, it is sizeable though not that solid nor dense as defined by its note appearance. Its enormity though doesn't seem to ever meddle with its mids, remarkably well-separated and blends nicely together
Soundstage dimension I feel is closer to being deeper than wide. Its depth feels vast as a dive into the deep abyss-like dark sea. Sub-bass is the standout here, as I think it plays a major role in creating this atmosphere with its good sustain post-attack
Mids are a bit recessed in its relative positioning, due to ONYX's sizeable bass. But it remains coherent throughout with no sign of disjoint in the transition or crossing from the bass frequency. Its timbre are on the warmer side, though that said it's not too organic. Neither is it too uncolored nor sterile, somewhat somewhere inbetween retaining a good balance of fidelity, and loads of fun
Treble also remains clear well-tempered, and never becoming too hot or splashy harsh. It's pretty well-defined, imparting enough brightness as to avoid the sound from becoming dull or lacking in any bite. Its treble is quite lively but it's never elevated too far apart from the mids, allowing for a good balanced contrast
Configuration
Driver(s): Hybrid 1 DD (Low) x 2 BA (Mid) x 1 BA (High)
Connector: 0.78mm 2-pin (with 3.5mm default plug)
Specification
Impedance: 16.5Ω
Sensitivity: 122dB/mW
Frequency range: 10Hz~20kHz
Model
（1）Matte Black
Accessories
・Silicone tips
・Foam tips
・Double-flange tips
・Cleaning brush
・Carrying case
・User manual
Disclaimer
ONYX was provided by EarSonics as a sample for writing this review. Sound impressions were based on listening with the stock cable and final Type E tips
Packaging
ONYX came packaged in a rectangular all black (including the text) carton box. It is quite a minimalistic presentation, straightforward and hassle-free. The box can also be opened conveniently by unfolding its magnetic binding
Opening the box, inside you can find the ONYX with cable already attached and rolled neatly inside its case
Next to them, on the right lies the rest of the accessories compartmentialized in another black carton box
In it contains all the tips, and one small cleaning brush
Build
Build quality on the ONYX is quite something and remarkable. Starting from the inside, EarSonics confined each driver using their newly-developed Acrylic Heart Technology, uniting them together securely
It then gets encased in a metallic shell that is matte-black in color, with EarSonics initial 'ES' design embossed on each faceplate
The connector is a standard 0.78mm 2-pin sockets. And the silver-colored cable feels light and easy to wear
Despite its heavier size, the monitor sits comfortably on my ear. Though for longer listening periods, it is less so. There wasn't any DD driver flex to be heard on my unit
Sliced View
EarSonics Proprietary Acrylic Heart Technology
Sound
The ONYX has this shallow v-shaped sound signature to it, that is deep and powerful down low, and yet clear well-defined up top. It has good mid-bass emphasis, with the mids slightly warmer more colored
Bass I think is the highlight on the ONYX, as it brings along with it to its presentation this large voluminous bass notes. Its bass doesn't slam too hard, but it makes its presence well-felt with its size and decay, as it has this exceptional mimicry of bass guitars' line vibration
It's quite fast in its attack, and well-kept and controlled as not to bleed overly into the lower-mids, coloring and muddying the sound. The bass also extend and reaches quite deep, however it doesn't rumble too much. It's almost earth-shattering skull-rattling, save for the visceral shaky feel
Bass I hear sounds more on the boosted loose bloomier side, it is sizeable though not that solid nor dense as defined by its note appearance. Its enormity though doesn't seem to ever meddle with its mids, remarkably well-separated and blends nicely together
Soundstage dimension I feel is closer to being deeper than wide. Its depth feels vast as a dive into the deep abyss-like dark sea. Sub-bass is the standout here, as I think it plays a major role in creating this atmosphere with its good sustain post-attack
Mids are a bit recessed in its relative positioning, due to ONYX's sizeable bass. But it remains coherent throughout with no sign of disjoint in the transition or crossing from the bass frequency. Its timbre are on the warmer side, though that said it's not too organic. Neither is it too uncolored nor sterile, somewhat somewhere inbetween retaining a good balance of fidelity, and loads of fun
Treble also remains clear well-tempered, and never becoming too hot or splashy harsh. It's pretty well-defined, imparting enough brightness as to avoid the sound from becoming dull or lacking in any bite. Its treble is quite lively but it's never elevated too far apart from the mids, allowing for a good balanced contrast
Attachments
Xinlisupreme
Did you compare it with Early?
cocolinho
You mention price is 490€ but looking at Earsonics webshop they are 590€, did they raise up the price ?
ranfan
@Xinlisupreme Sorry but I no longer have the Early with me, so couldn't compare 
@cocolinho I think that may be the price + VAT, if you're living in EU (link)
@cocolinho I think that may be the price + VAT, if you're living in EU (link)
Softears RS10 ($2099)
Configuration
Driver(s): 10 BA (4 x Low, 2 x High, 4 x General) + 1 Passive unit
Connector: 0.78mm 2-pin (with 3.5mm default plug)
Specification
Impedance: 25Ω @ 1kHz
Sensitivity: 100dB/100mV @ 1kHz
Frequency range: 20Hz~40kHz
Model
（1）Acrylic transparent shell + White stripe faceplate
Accessories
・Silicone tips
・Cable tie x 2
・Wiping cloth
・Cloth pouch x 2 (for each monitor)
・Round leather case
・User manual
・Warranty card
Disclaimer
Softears RS10 was purchased by me for my own personal use and collection. Sound impressions were obtained based on what I hear, using the stock cable and Azla SednaEarfit Light tips. I am not affiliated with Softears nor any brands mentioned in this review
Packaging
RS10 came packaged in a simple cube-shaped small black carton box. It's a simple lightweight minimal packaging, very pragmatic and formal-looking, befitting its 'studio reference' title/theme
The box can be opened by sliding it outwards like a drawer. Upon opening, you're greeted with a black round leather case embossed elegantly with 'Softears' logo and white thread stitched encircling the case
Inside the leather case, you can find the two monitors resting nicely wrapped in cloth pouches, with cable already attached and neatly tied with two small velcro ties
There are several accessories bundled together beneath the case. They include a microfiber wiping cloth, a complete set (S, M, L size pairs) of silicone eartips, a user manual, and a warranty card
Looking at the stock cable, the RS10 came paired with a 2-wire 24AWG cable. The length is approximately 1.25 meters long. And terminated with a standard 0.78mm 2-pin connector, and 3.5mm straight stereo mini plug
The cable itself feels nice, soft and elastic. It's not too thick nor heavy in size, allowing its preformed earhooks to sit comfortably around the ear. There is also a red rubber ring indicator near the right connector of the cable to help quickly identify which side
One thing to note though, is that the stock cable doesn't come with a slider to adjust from the splitter upwards. Which may be a little annoying to some, especially those who move around frequently while listening
Build
Focusing on the build of the monitors themselves, the RS10 was built with an acrylic material shell. You can gleam into the internals through its transparent clear shell, and see them neatly arranged clearly as if they're submerged frozen under still water and time
The shells are fully-filled with extreme attention to details, leaving no trace of bubbles, blemishes or glue excess to be found anywhere. It's clean, simple, and neutral in color, not much is left to want with the faceplate also uniform in color. It's attached at the bottom of each faceplate a silver 'Softears' logo, as well as several vertical white stripes decorating the front. Minimal and tasteful
The shell size is somewhat on the larger side, especially on the thickness aspect. In addition, the RS10 has also quite a long stem, which may favor those who listen with a deeper insert. But for use on the go, I think the RS10 a less inconspicuous choice, due to the thickness of the shell. Which may cause the monitor to appear to protrude out of your ears more than average in-ears would
But that thickness do come with a reason, as the RS10 are equipped with quite a numerous 10 BA drivers + 1 passive unit per side. They're connected together via this complex bespoke 5-way crossover system. This crossover consists of 2-band pass filter, a low pass, and a 4th order LC filter to match even higher-end loudspeaker designs. Its meticulous impedance control system is said to allow for phase consistency across the audible range, indifferent to varying sources and in output power
10 BA driver units are placed in each side, 4 units responsible for low frequencies, 2 for highs, and the remaining 4 for the entire spectrum. And besides the BA, the RS10 are also equipped with a passive unit, which despite not capable of emitting any sound, it's said to aid in air pressure regulation, wear fatigue relief, hearing protection, and even bass texture enhancement
Overall high-quality resin shell material and build/assembly. Aesthetically pleasing, the RS10 is also very much suitable for professional studio monitoring setting. It's elegant, simple and transparent design especially is a lovely to look at
Sound
There is beauty in simplicity. There is grace in complexity presented simply and truthfully
The RS10 was tuned with a reference sound in mind, resembling the 'real' and with very few coloration in between. Combined with ultra-high resolution and immense staging, the RS10 possess one of the most technically proficient and tonally accurate monitors I've heard thus far
One of the standout, is how the sound is capable of surgically deliver details especially in the midrange. And at a level that is fit for even mastering, mixing, or monitoring purposes
As mentioned, the RS10 have a relatively uncolored timbre. Neutral across the midrange, with slight elevation in mid-bass and upper-mids (slightly emphasizing the latter)
The bass remains relatively quiet unless called for. And it stays behind the mids supporting it nicely. It has a distinct BA characteristics to it, quick, and not bloated in any way. The bass amount feels just right never hindering or overshadowing the mids, and its texture blends well together with the mids, avoiding any sense of bleed or incoherency
The mids has this clear sound that is very capable delivering even the minute details present in the track. Pristine vocals that is portrayed on a still dark background. It makes for a clean sense or feel to its sound. The timbre too is neither too warm nor cold. Ambivalent, being just right in the middle, and slightly on the drier side in terms of texture
Configuration
Driver(s): 10 BA (4 x Low, 2 x High, 4 x General) + 1 Passive unit
Connector: 0.78mm 2-pin (with 3.5mm default plug)
Specification
Impedance: 25Ω @ 1kHz
Sensitivity: 100dB/100mV @ 1kHz
Frequency range: 20Hz~40kHz
Model
（1）Acrylic transparent shell + White stripe faceplate
Accessories
・Silicone tips
・Cable tie x 2
・Wiping cloth
・Cloth pouch x 2 (for each monitor)
・Round leather case
・User manual
・Warranty card
Disclaimer
Softears RS10 was purchased by me for my own personal use and collection. Sound impressions were obtained based on what I hear, using the stock cable and Azla SednaEarfit Light tips. I am not affiliated with Softears nor any brands mentioned in this review
Packaging
RS10 came packaged in a simple cube-shaped small black carton box. It's a simple lightweight minimal packaging, very pragmatic and formal-looking, befitting its 'studio reference' title/theme
The box can be opened by sliding it outwards like a drawer. Upon opening, you're greeted with a black round leather case embossed elegantly with 'Softears' logo and white thread stitched encircling the case
Inside the leather case, you can find the two monitors resting nicely wrapped in cloth pouches, with cable already attached and neatly tied with two small velcro ties
There are several accessories bundled together beneath the case. They include a microfiber wiping cloth, a complete set (S, M, L size pairs) of silicone eartips, a user manual, and a warranty card
Looking at the stock cable, the RS10 came paired with a 2-wire 24AWG cable. The length is approximately 1.25 meters long. And terminated with a standard 0.78mm 2-pin connector, and 3.5mm straight stereo mini plug
The cable itself feels nice, soft and elastic. It's not too thick nor heavy in size, allowing its preformed earhooks to sit comfortably around the ear. There is also a red rubber ring indicator near the right connector of the cable to help quickly identify which side
One thing to note though, is that the stock cable doesn't come with a slider to adjust from the splitter upwards. Which may be a little annoying to some, especially those who move around frequently while listening
Build
Focusing on the build of the monitors themselves, the RS10 was built with an acrylic material shell. You can gleam into the internals through its transparent clear shell, and see them neatly arranged clearly as if they're submerged frozen under still water and time
The shells are fully-filled with extreme attention to details, leaving no trace of bubbles, blemishes or glue excess to be found anywhere. It's clean, simple, and neutral in color, not much is left to want with the faceplate also uniform in color. It's attached at the bottom of each faceplate a silver 'Softears' logo, as well as several vertical white stripes decorating the front. Minimal and tasteful
The shell size is somewhat on the larger side, especially on the thickness aspect. In addition, the RS10 has also quite a long stem, which may favor those who listen with a deeper insert. But for use on the go, I think the RS10 a less inconspicuous choice, due to the thickness of the shell. Which may cause the monitor to appear to protrude out of your ears more than average in-ears would
But that thickness do come with a reason, as the RS10 are equipped with quite a numerous 10 BA drivers + 1 passive unit per side. They're connected together via this complex bespoke 5-way crossover system. This crossover consists of 2-band pass filter, a low pass, and a 4th order LC filter to match even higher-end loudspeaker designs. Its meticulous impedance control system is said to allow for phase consistency across the audible range, indifferent to varying sources and in output power
10 BA driver units are placed in each side, 4 units responsible for low frequencies, 2 for highs, and the remaining 4 for the entire spectrum. And besides the BA, the RS10 are also equipped with a passive unit, which despite not capable of emitting any sound, it's said to aid in air pressure regulation, wear fatigue relief, hearing protection, and even bass texture enhancement
Overall high-quality resin shell material and build/assembly. Aesthetically pleasing, the RS10 is also very much suitable for professional studio monitoring setting. It's elegant, simple and transparent design especially is a lovely to look at
Sound
There is beauty in simplicity. There is grace in complexity presented simply and truthfully
The RS10 was tuned with a reference sound in mind, resembling the 'real' and with very few coloration in between. Combined with ultra-high resolution and immense staging, the RS10 possess one of the most technically proficient and tonally accurate monitors I've heard thus far
One of the standout, is how the sound is capable of surgically deliver details especially in the midrange. And at a level that is fit for even mastering, mixing, or monitoring purposes
As mentioned, the RS10 have a relatively uncolored timbre. Neutral across the midrange, with slight elevation in mid-bass and upper-mids (slightly emphasizing the latter)
The bass remains relatively quiet unless called for. And it stays behind the mids supporting it nicely. It has a distinct BA characteristics to it, quick, and not bloated in any way. The bass amount feels just right never hindering or overshadowing the mids, and its texture blends well together with the mids, avoiding any sense of bleed or incoherency
The mids has this clear sound that is very capable delivering even the minute details present in the track. Pristine vocals that is portrayed on a still dark background. It makes for a clean sense or feel to its sound. The timbre too is neither too warm nor cold. Ambivalent, being just right in the middle, and slightly on the drier side in terms of texture
Wildcatsare1
Another excellent review!
ranfan
@drftr Hey J! 
RS10's dynamics are quite a wonder as its resolution alike, especially when fed with proper amount of driving power. The detail retrieval to me stood out more, but the dynamics from its lows to treble are also one of its stronger suit. As a result of this, you can also hear how neatly all instruments are arranged, and layered in a wider more expansive scale than most/less technical monitors. It'is a technical marvel, and tonally it also delivers the sound as is with very few colorations. As for its soundstage, I felt the RS10 are a bit on the wider side, with slightly above average rectangular box-shaped stage size. The sound presented felt grand and large, but not too distant, well positioned perhaps slightly more forward due to its elevation and pronounciation in its upper-mids
@Wildcatsare1 Thank you for your kind comment!
RS10's dynamics are quite a wonder as its resolution alike, especially when fed with proper amount of driving power. The detail retrieval to me stood out more, but the dynamics from its lows to treble are also one of its stronger suit. As a result of this, you can also hear how neatly all instruments are arranged, and layered in a wider more expansive scale than most/less technical monitors. It'is a technical marvel, and tonally it also delivers the sound as is with very few colorations. As for its soundstage, I felt the RS10 are a bit on the wider side, with slightly above average rectangular box-shaped stage size. The sound presented felt grand and large, but not too distant, well positioned perhaps slightly more forward due to its elevation and pronounciation in its upper-mids@Wildcatsare1 Thank you for your kind comment!
WAON303
Pretty lackluster packaging given the price tag.
Oriolus Isabellae ($659)
Configuration
Driver(s): 1 x 9.8mm DD
Connector: 2-pin (with 4.4mm default plug)
Specification
Impedance: 30 Ohm
Sensitivity: 113dB
Frequency response: 10Hz~40kHz
Weight: 13g per side
Model
（1）Amber transparent shell + Brass faceplate
Accessories
・Double-flange tips
・Foam tips
・Silicone tips
・Cable tie
・Cable clip
・Cleaning tool (brush, pick)
Disclaimer
Oriolus Isabellae was purchased by me for my own personal use and collection. All sound impressions were obtained based on what I hear, using the stock cable, PEE51 USB-C dongle, and Azla SednaEarfit Light tips. I am not affiliated with Oriolus nor any brands mentioned in this review
Packaging
The Oriolus Isabellae came in a simple white box ensleeved with a silver-gray carton with a red 'Oriolus' text and bird logo. Or at least what seems to be a bird drawn from a simple line
Opening the box, inside you can find the pair of IEMs perched comfortably in a foam cushion with its cable attached
Beneath the first layer of the foam cushion, is a box-shaped portion of space allocated for Isabellae's accessories and warranty card
The accessories included include some pairs of eartips, cable clip, and cleaning tool. All of which I left in peace. Except for that one pair of silicone tips which came already attached
One thing I wish could be added along with the accessories though, an adapter/converter for the cable's default balanced plug into 3.5mm unbalanced output. You may need to have an adapter ready if you don't have a native 4.4mm balanced input built with your source
All in all, the Isabellae came packaged in a relatively minimalistic style
Build
The Isabellae was built with an acrylic material shell encasing its 9.8mm dynamic driver. Its transparent amber shell blends well with its brass faceplate in color
The transparent shell also has this lovely opacity to it, that is not too light nor dark in hue. It seems to me resembling of an amber fossil. Fun fact, the Isabellae itself was named after an elusive bird (Isabela Oriole) which was once believed/presumed to be extinct for many years. But was rediscovered in the early 90s (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isabela_oriole)
The faceplate has this round embossing, with six small vent ports encircling it. And at the center an engraved 'Oriolus' text
Its nozzle diameter is slightly on the bigger side, above average in size. Around 0.2~0.3mm bigger than that on the Elysium
The monitor is connected via a standard 0.78mm recessed 2-pin sockets. And at the opposite end of the pathway, its bore is installed with metallic mesh. The cable is terminated with 4.4mm balanced plug by default. Very supple and flexible to wear, it has also this smooth rubber-like quality to its wire shielding
The cable seems to have this durable/lasting build quality to it, that is light and comfortable to wear. It's split in the middle by a small metallic silver splitter with an 'Oriolus' text printed on it. Plus a uniform slider which can be adjusted rather easily up-and-down
Overall a good ergonomic design, with its preformed ear hooks and high quality heatshrinks minimizing any form of discomfort on the ears
Sound
Firstly, despite the Isabellae being based on a DD design, there was no typical driver flex heard when I insert them. It is also quite easy to drive from any phone. Not very picky and not sensitive to hisses. You can basically use whatever, at the same time it can also scale with higher-powered source
The Isabellae I think was tuned with more focus primarily on upper-mids and treble. Acoustic performances sound especially exceptional, the standout being both male and female vocals. They sound vivid yet smooth, highly textured to resemble its real counterpart. It's lush and natural, with each note having a good organic timbre and sweetness on top. Vocals on Isabellae are a wonder to behold. It is perhaps the most natural and inspiring vocals I've heard
Presentation in general is tilted towards the brighter clearer side, yet with a hint of warmth incorporated within each note. The enveloping air surrounding it felt somewhat surreal. Striking a good balance between glow and shade
The single DD on Isabellae is remarkable for both its reach and finesse. It is well-implemented to showcase each unique sound throughout the frequency range. Bass goes low into the sub region, and is tight as well as controlled without ever becoming muddy. Its quantity is rather neutral, with less rumble and more emphasis on its mid-bass punch. It has this high definition, full-bodied dense quality to it, that is simultaneously delicate in its execution
Bass on these aren't exactly enormous 'canon' or 'monster'-like in overall character. It is a bass I'd describe as tending more towards precision and controlled explosion, rather than a reckless berserk. It embodies DD texture, size and rumble well, but with minimal necessary force so not to ever become overly bassy. It is a deceivingly skillful and potent bass, prioritizing quality over quantity. And it felt very substantial throughout. The upper-bass are as well attenuated slightly to allow better articulation and separation, playing more of a faithful supporting role to its midrange
Stage dimension on the Isabellae I think are more on the intimate side, with highly transparent seamless layering. It is not overly grand or spacious per se, but it makes up for this with its airy open nature. It has a good depth and an average height, complemented with a slightly above average width
The Isa has this lifelike imaging that impressed me so. Not for its excess of microdetails, but more primarily of its natural and coherent representation/mimicry of the real primal sound. Especially whispers, hum, breath and such are captured and recreated nicely, making them sound quite 'alive' in a sense
Midrange positioning is forward-centered, with its treble supporting it, and next bass. They're all neatly arranged and close-knit. They synergise well to enhance the mids (especially upper-mids), and as a result capable of creating a highly immersive listening experience
Resolution in particular is also one of Isa's highlight. While being relatively high, it doesn't try to show it off too much. Preferring a more reserved style through mixing it with some warmth, and with less analytical more laidback approach. Instruments and vocals largely are well-defined and pretty tonally accurate
Its treble I think is also one of its stronger points. It extends far into the upper-end whilst remaining smooth, gentle and lucid throughout. It avoids any sharpness or peaky sibilance. Unlike some IEMs with more eclectic treble, the tuning on the Isabellae reflects a more elegant projection. It has this far-reaching extension and smooth downward slope after the 7~8kHz area. This allows for instruments to have enough radiance to them, while giving that velvety caressing touch to tail its rendition
*All listening was done at night when everything was quieter
Comparison
Vision Ears Elysium ($2563)
Configuration
Driver(s): 1 BA x Low, 1 DD x Mid, 2 EST x High
＋ HALC (High-precision Acoustic Levelling Chamber)
Connector: 2-pin (with 2.5mm default plug)
The Elysium is an IEM which I think have somewhat similar tuning to the Isabellae. It focuses its highlight in producing one of the most natural, vibrant and lifelike sound emulatable
They both are brimming with this vivacious midrange and treble. With the Elysium executing this through its hybrid EST configuration, and Isabellae through its single DD. Each endowed with their own unique vision and way to demonstrate their prowess
Vision Ears to me have always this neat and clean signature sound that I admire. It's a blend of one part surgical precision details, and another serene captivating musicality
Oriolus on the other hand, with their knack for reproducing lush organic vocals, capable of educing that raw human emotion, leaving the listener spellbound with the entire sound
Both of which appeal to me, and I personally enjoy them very much. Starting from the base, their timbre; the Elysium has what I'd describe as having this crystalline tender and clear sound. It has this superb shimmering clarity that is more delicate in the upper end. The Isabellae diversely sounded calmer, and its timbre have a more liquid quality to it. It's warmer in tone and overall much more coherent particularly in the lower end
Bass felt slightly less substantial, with less deeper reach on the Elysium. It also has a quicker attack and decay, as well as a smaller imaging size. The sound felt more like 'thump', whereas on the Isa it sounded closer to a 'boom'. Mind you, this was derived from listening to the universal Elysium model. The bass was said to improve as you get a better seal on the custom version. But overall I feel the Elysium has this lighter quicker bass, and not as voluminous relative to the Isabellae
Note size felt leaner and lighter on the Elysium. It has this gleaming quality to each note, that is accentuated together with its cooler more refreshing tone. Electric guitars has more bite and sounded better on the Elysium. It's more agile, yet at the same time capable of evincing more details with the higher resolution it possesses
Both have each uniquely vivid imaging. With the Elysium rendering it in a more accurate and precise manner. It has more sparkle and shimmer up top. But at the same time, have less presence in the lower midrange. The Isabellae sounded more dynamic and composed in that area. Its midrange just sounds more solid/weighty and well put together from bottom up
The stage presentation on the Ely felt slightly narrower with taller height. Both have similar average stage size and an open airy feel. It's slightly warmer on the Isa. And airier as well as brighter on the Ely. Both have excellent extension in their treble, the Elysium having more presence and consequently giving its presentation more clarity and clean atmospheric feel to it
String and brass instruments are especially good on the Ely. It's capable of portraying them with such svelte and grace. Relatively thinner and crisper in its sound. Treble notes have slightly less warmth, and more energy to them. Isabellae's treble on the other hand sounded more mellow, and less prone to showing sharpness or peaks in some tracks. This is more apparent, with the Elysium showing more pronounced 'ts', 'ch' or 'sh' sound, which I'm quite sensitive of. In general, the Elysium I hear has relatively more prominence in its upper-mids and treble display
Vocals sounded thicker, more lush and organic on the Isabellae. More laidback and natural. It emanate and melts in your ears the more you listen. It sounded less clinical, with more spread imaging and fuller note consistency. Albeit at the expense of some speed, agility, and details. Lower vocal registers in particular sounded notable on the Isa. And I found it really enjoyable to listen to and feel, as it imparts its reverberation throughout the stage
Configuration
Driver(s): 1 x 9.8mm DD
Connector: 2-pin (with 4.4mm default plug)
Specification
Impedance: 30 Ohm
Sensitivity: 113dB
Frequency response: 10Hz~40kHz
Weight: 13g per side
Model
（1）Amber transparent shell + Brass faceplate
Accessories
・Double-flange tips
・Foam tips
・Silicone tips
・Cable tie
・Cable clip
・Cleaning tool (brush, pick)
Disclaimer
Oriolus Isabellae was purchased by me for my own personal use and collection. All sound impressions were obtained based on what I hear, using the stock cable, PEE51 USB-C dongle, and Azla SednaEarfit Light tips. I am not affiliated with Oriolus nor any brands mentioned in this review
Packaging
The Oriolus Isabellae came in a simple white box ensleeved with a silver-gray carton with a red 'Oriolus' text and bird logo. Or at least what seems to be a bird drawn from a simple line
Opening the box, inside you can find the pair of IEMs perched comfortably in a foam cushion with its cable attached
Beneath the first layer of the foam cushion, is a box-shaped portion of space allocated for Isabellae's accessories and warranty card
The accessories included include some pairs of eartips, cable clip, and cleaning tool. All of which I left in peace. Except for that one pair of silicone tips which came already attached
One thing I wish could be added along with the accessories though, an adapter/converter for the cable's default balanced plug into 3.5mm unbalanced output. You may need to have an adapter ready if you don't have a native 4.4mm balanced input built with your source
All in all, the Isabellae came packaged in a relatively minimalistic style
Build
The Isabellae was built with an acrylic material shell encasing its 9.8mm dynamic driver. Its transparent amber shell blends well with its brass faceplate in color
The transparent shell also has this lovely opacity to it, that is not too light nor dark in hue. It seems to me resembling of an amber fossil. Fun fact, the Isabellae itself was named after an elusive bird (Isabela Oriole) which was once believed/presumed to be extinct for many years. But was rediscovered in the early 90s (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isabela_oriole)
The faceplate has this round embossing, with six small vent ports encircling it. And at the center an engraved 'Oriolus' text
Its nozzle diameter is slightly on the bigger side, above average in size. Around 0.2~0.3mm bigger than that on the Elysium
The monitor is connected via a standard 0.78mm recessed 2-pin sockets. And at the opposite end of the pathway, its bore is installed with metallic mesh. The cable is terminated with 4.4mm balanced plug by default. Very supple and flexible to wear, it has also this smooth rubber-like quality to its wire shielding
The cable seems to have this durable/lasting build quality to it, that is light and comfortable to wear. It's split in the middle by a small metallic silver splitter with an 'Oriolus' text printed on it. Plus a uniform slider which can be adjusted rather easily up-and-down
Overall a good ergonomic design, with its preformed ear hooks and high quality heatshrinks minimizing any form of discomfort on the ears
Sound
Firstly, despite the Isabellae being based on a DD design, there was no typical driver flex heard when I insert them. It is also quite easy to drive from any phone. Not very picky and not sensitive to hisses. You can basically use whatever, at the same time it can also scale with higher-powered source
The Isabellae I think was tuned with more focus primarily on upper-mids and treble. Acoustic performances sound especially exceptional, the standout being both male and female vocals. They sound vivid yet smooth, highly textured to resemble its real counterpart. It's lush and natural, with each note having a good organic timbre and sweetness on top. Vocals on Isabellae are a wonder to behold. It is perhaps the most natural and inspiring vocals I've heard
Presentation in general is tilted towards the brighter clearer side, yet with a hint of warmth incorporated within each note. The enveloping air surrounding it felt somewhat surreal. Striking a good balance between glow and shade
The single DD on Isabellae is remarkable for both its reach and finesse. It is well-implemented to showcase each unique sound throughout the frequency range. Bass goes low into the sub region, and is tight as well as controlled without ever becoming muddy. Its quantity is rather neutral, with less rumble and more emphasis on its mid-bass punch. It has this high definition, full-bodied dense quality to it, that is simultaneously delicate in its execution
Bass on these aren't exactly enormous 'canon' or 'monster'-like in overall character. It is a bass I'd describe as tending more towards precision and controlled explosion, rather than a reckless berserk. It embodies DD texture, size and rumble well, but with minimal necessary force so not to ever become overly bassy. It is a deceivingly skillful and potent bass, prioritizing quality over quantity. And it felt very substantial throughout. The upper-bass are as well attenuated slightly to allow better articulation and separation, playing more of a faithful supporting role to its midrange
Stage dimension on the Isabellae I think are more on the intimate side, with highly transparent seamless layering. It is not overly grand or spacious per se, but it makes up for this with its airy open nature. It has a good depth and an average height, complemented with a slightly above average width
The Isa has this lifelike imaging that impressed me so. Not for its excess of microdetails, but more primarily of its natural and coherent representation/mimicry of the real primal sound. Especially whispers, hum, breath and such are captured and recreated nicely, making them sound quite 'alive' in a sense
Midrange positioning is forward-centered, with its treble supporting it, and next bass. They're all neatly arranged and close-knit. They synergise well to enhance the mids (especially upper-mids), and as a result capable of creating a highly immersive listening experience
Resolution in particular is also one of Isa's highlight. While being relatively high, it doesn't try to show it off too much. Preferring a more reserved style through mixing it with some warmth, and with less analytical more laidback approach. Instruments and vocals largely are well-defined and pretty tonally accurate
Its treble I think is also one of its stronger points. It extends far into the upper-end whilst remaining smooth, gentle and lucid throughout. It avoids any sharpness or peaky sibilance. Unlike some IEMs with more eclectic treble, the tuning on the Isabellae reflects a more elegant projection. It has this far-reaching extension and smooth downward slope after the 7~8kHz area. This allows for instruments to have enough radiance to them, while giving that velvety caressing touch to tail its rendition
*All listening was done at night when everything was quieter
Comparison
Vision Ears Elysium ($2563)
Configuration
Driver(s): 1 BA x Low, 1 DD x Mid, 2 EST x High
＋ HALC (High-precision Acoustic Levelling Chamber)
Connector: 2-pin (with 2.5mm default plug)
The Elysium is an IEM which I think have somewhat similar tuning to the Isabellae. It focuses its highlight in producing one of the most natural, vibrant and lifelike sound emulatable
They both are brimming with this vivacious midrange and treble. With the Elysium executing this through its hybrid EST configuration, and Isabellae through its single DD. Each endowed with their own unique vision and way to demonstrate their prowess
Vision Ears to me have always this neat and clean signature sound that I admire. It's a blend of one part surgical precision details, and another serene captivating musicality
Oriolus on the other hand, with their knack for reproducing lush organic vocals, capable of educing that raw human emotion, leaving the listener spellbound with the entire sound
Both of which appeal to me, and I personally enjoy them very much. Starting from the base, their timbre; the Elysium has what I'd describe as having this crystalline tender and clear sound. It has this superb shimmering clarity that is more delicate in the upper end. The Isabellae diversely sounded calmer, and its timbre have a more liquid quality to it. It's warmer in tone and overall much more coherent particularly in the lower end
Bass felt slightly less substantial, with less deeper reach on the Elysium. It also has a quicker attack and decay, as well as a smaller imaging size. The sound felt more like 'thump', whereas on the Isa it sounded closer to a 'boom'. Mind you, this was derived from listening to the universal Elysium model. The bass was said to improve as you get a better seal on the custom version. But overall I feel the Elysium has this lighter quicker bass, and not as voluminous relative to the Isabellae
Note size felt leaner and lighter on the Elysium. It has this gleaming quality to each note, that is accentuated together with its cooler more refreshing tone. Electric guitars has more bite and sounded better on the Elysium. It's more agile, yet at the same time capable of evincing more details with the higher resolution it possesses
Both have each uniquely vivid imaging. With the Elysium rendering it in a more accurate and precise manner. It has more sparkle and shimmer up top. But at the same time, have less presence in the lower midrange. The Isabellae sounded more dynamic and composed in that area. Its midrange just sounds more solid/weighty and well put together from bottom up
The stage presentation on the Ely felt slightly narrower with taller height. Both have similar average stage size and an open airy feel. It's slightly warmer on the Isa. And airier as well as brighter on the Ely. Both have excellent extension in their treble, the Elysium having more presence and consequently giving its presentation more clarity and clean atmospheric feel to it
String and brass instruments are especially good on the Ely. It's capable of portraying them with such svelte and grace. Relatively thinner and crisper in its sound. Treble notes have slightly less warmth, and more energy to them. Isabellae's treble on the other hand sounded more mellow, and less prone to showing sharpness or peaks in some tracks. This is more apparent, with the Elysium showing more pronounced 'ts', 'ch' or 'sh' sound, which I'm quite sensitive of. In general, the Elysium I hear has relatively more prominence in its upper-mids and treble display
Vocals sounded thicker, more lush and organic on the Isabellae. More laidback and natural. It emanate and melts in your ears the more you listen. It sounded less clinical, with more spread imaging and fuller note consistency. Albeit at the expense of some speed, agility, and details. Lower vocal registers in particular sounded notable on the Isa. And I found it really enjoyable to listen to and feel, as it imparts its reverberation throughout the stage
Attachments
Stuff Jones
Nice review.
Is isolation as poor is it looks like it will be with the vents?
Is isolation as poor is it looks like it will be with the vents?
ranfan
@Stuff Jones Thanks! Not at all. They isolate as well as any other universal IEMs. Provided you can get a good seal. They're not prone to leak sound like planar open-back models do
Not at all. They isolate as well as any other universal IEMs. Provided you can get a good seal. They're not prone to leak sound like planar open-back models do
Unique Melody MASON 2 ($2800)
About:
Unique Melody MASON In-ear Monitor (IEM) was jointly developed and completed by Unique Melody, and Mix Wave. The IEM was mainly designed for the Japanese market. It uses 12 BA drivers; 4 x Low, 4 x Mid, 2 x High, 2 x Super-high. The 'MASON 2' model was developed and completed in about two years. Succeeding to the earlier popular 'MASON' model.
Configuration:
12 BA drivers, 4 x Low, 4 x Mid, 2 x High, 2 x Super-high
Crossover, 3-way
Twin vent holes
Quad-bores
Platinum-plated metal tube
Specification:
Frequency response, 20 Hz ~ 20 kHz
Sensitivity, 111.4 dB
Impedance, 22.1 Ohm
Model:
*Limited edition
Accessories:
- Stock cable
- Metallic case
- Mini pouch
- Microfiber cloth
- Cleaning tool
- Airplane adapter
- 6.3-mm adapter
- Foam + silicon tips
Disclaimer:
This review is intended to provide information for reading purposes only. It does not advice, nor constitute any solicitation or endorsement for any purchase. Any purchase you make is done at your own risk and full discretion. Please be informed that impression written in this review is relatively subjective. Sound impression was obtained based upon what I hear, using the default stock cable, and Aune M1s digital audio player. Please keep in mind, that your impression and usage experience may vary. The Unique Melody MASON 2 universal in-ear monitor was purchased by me as a part of my personal collection. I am not affiliated with Unique Melody, nor Mix Wave. All rights reserved.
Build quality:
The MASON 2 is built with a high-quality acrylic shell, enclosing its 12 BA drivers and their wiring. These 12 BA drivers are allotted for the following frequencies; 4 x Low, 4 x Mid, 2 x High, 2 x Super-high.
It has four bores constructed. These quad bores consist of three smaller ones, and one bigger. The MASON 2 uses recessed 2-pin sockets as its connectors.
At the back of each faceplates, you can find two open ports incorporated beside the 'Unique Melody' and 'MASON' logo. These newly added twin vent holes, mainly help to optimize air flow of the monitors. So to enhance the performance of the open/vented BA drivers within them.
Furthermore, the MASON 2 uses platinum-plated metal for its sound conduit/tubes. This is claimed to maintain a better sonic quality as it's transmitted through from the drivers.
I received one cable as a part of the MASON 2 accessory. The stock cable is very light and ergonomic. Suitable for use on the go.
Sound quality:
Upon first listen, I was greeted with a quiet, silent background. The MASON 2 is a rather source-tolerant IEM, not very sensitive to hisses. Even plugged directly to my laptop, or phone, the hiss is very minimal.
Stage dimension is wide and deep. It is exceptionally spacious and open. Imaging of each note is clear. As they're skillfully positioned and layered in the stage. Each instrument has fair spacing apart to one another. The stage is a bit warm, but quite airy. Instruments I hear sound neatly coherent, even in congested tracks. Background is clean, somewhat transparent, and overall highly immersive.
MASON 2's tonality is fairly neutral, with the bass enhanced. It has quite a natural, and balanced tonality. Kind of warm, smooth, and non-fatiguing. I haven't hear any excessive peaks or sibilance so far using this IEM.
Resolution and detail retrieval are very good, given its slightly warm stage. Instruments are well-defined, in accordance to their real counterpart. Although it is not overly-analytical, the MASON 2 is pretty realistic and tonally accurate.
Bass has a good extension, it goes deep and is quite powerful. It has a bit of dynamic character, and energy. But with a faster, more controlled BA speed. Sub-bass is good, it reaches low, and rumbles well. Mid-bass is dense, tight, and full of energy. All in all, the bass on the MASON 2 is resolved, and positively satisfying.
Midrange is neutral with a high resolution and tonal accuracy. Despite not being the most precise, the MASON 2 generates a rather pleasant, natural timbre. You can hear it especially in the acoustic and vocal department. The MASON 2 has a good tonal balance between warmth and clarity. Note density is neither too thick nor lean. Each having good imaging, layer, and definition.
Upper-mid region has this smooth, controlled tone. That is never sharp or sibilant. There is a slight lift which adds for an extra clarity to the whole sound spectrum.
Treble of the MASON 2 extends pretty far, rolling off at 13-14 kHz. This provides for much of the airiness, transparency, and detail to the overall sound. It has a forgiving smooth tone that is very natural, gentle, and clear.
Comparison:
Oriolus 2 ($800, Hybrid; 1 DD x Low, 1 BA x Low, 1 BA x Mid, 1 BA x High) :
Both IEMs have an overall smooth, and clear tonality. Oriolus 2 has a smaller stage dimension in comparison. Which is mainly due to its warmth, and note size. The MASON 2 on the other hand, has a cleaner, more transparent background. Mainly as a result of its resolution, and clarity.
They both present a rather warm atmosphere, with rich, and dynamic sound. The Oriolus 2 has a weightier note size due to its larger bass. This makes for a more engaging, fun listen with some genres.
The instrument notes are both relatively full-bodied. Oriolus 2 however has less space in their layering, and separation. Creating a more crowded, less coherent stage.
Bass is pretty similar for both IEMs. Depth is almost equal, the Oriolus 2 being deeper. Surprising; given their different driver source (i.e. DD x BA). Oriolus 2 still, has slightly more impact width from its dynamic driver. Albeit with the expense of less control, and slower decay/transient. You can feel the reverberation and its interaction with the stage. The Oriolus 2 has a voluptuous bass that you can feel rumbling. While MASON 2 has a quicker bass, with finer resolution. Both similarly are very satisfying.
Midrange are both pretty natural, smooth, and clear. The MASON 2 with its tonality, and resolution. While the Oriolus 2 with its warmth, and increased upper-mid. Oriolus 2 has a slightly warmer air, and as a result less detail. The MASON 2 is more detailed, and tonally accurate.
They both have a lift in the upper-mid frequency. With Oriolus 2 a sharper one, and MASON 2 a gentler one. Sensitive listeners may find the Oriolus 2 upper-mid a bit overwhelming sometimes (e.g. cymbal, snares).
MASON 2's treble extension is longer in comparison. This creates an airier stage that is more transparent than Oriolus 2. The Oriolus 2 has a peakier, more fatiguing treble that is not as forgiving as MASON 2.
Noble Kaiser Encore ($1850, 10 BA):
K10E has a bit more width, and height in its dimension. The stage feels more spacious and airier, due to its lean/lighter note size. The MASON 2 however is deeper, and has better layering ability. K10E can be highly transparent. But it's pretty sensitive, so you'll need to select the right source.
K10E is brighter, colder, and more analytical. It displays as neutral, but with more bump in mid-bass, and upper-mid frequency. The MASON 2 feels warmer, smooth, and more natural. The K10E, sounds more precise, and detailed. It is bright, and cleaner. While the MASON 2 sounds lively, and more engaging. Still, both have good resolution, and imaging.
Bass on the K10E is boosted more in the mid-section. While its sub-section can be found lacking in volume. The MASON 2 has a more satisfying overall bass. Its bass extends deeper, more voluminous, and dynamic. That being said, the K10E's leaner bass has better control, and quicker speed.
Midrange is highlighted more in the K10E. It has a brighter presentation which exposes a lot of micro-details. Notes are leaner and more articulate. While the MASON 2 has a better balance between warmth, and clarity. This balance, allows the MASON 2 to produce notes with a more natural timbre that is closer to reality. They both have good technical abilities, with the K10E excelling in separation, and transparency.
Upper-mid, or lower-treble is both the K10E's strength, and also its weakness (at least for me). It has this distinct lift in it, which is good for providing clarity to the whole sound. But also unpleasant for some sensitive listeners. The MASON 2 has a smoother, less-fatiguing tone. It displays better control in this area.
Both treble extends very well. They both recreate details nicely.
About:
Unique Melody MASON In-ear Monitor (IEM) was jointly developed and completed by Unique Melody, and Mix Wave. The IEM was mainly designed for the Japanese market. It uses 12 BA drivers; 4 x Low, 4 x Mid, 2 x High, 2 x Super-high. The 'MASON 2' model was developed and completed in about two years. Succeeding to the earlier popular 'MASON' model.
Configuration:
12 BA drivers, 4 x Low, 4 x Mid, 2 x High, 2 x Super-high
Crossover, 3-way
Twin vent holes
Quad-bores
Platinum-plated metal tube
Specification:
Frequency response, 20 Hz ~ 20 kHz
Sensitivity, 111.4 dB
Impedance, 22.1 Ohm
Model:
| Normal | Clear* | WineRed* | Dignis* | Custom, http://www.mixwave.co.jp |
 |  |  |  |  |
Accessories:
- Stock cable
- Metallic case
- Mini pouch
- Microfiber cloth
- Cleaning tool
- Airplane adapter
- 6.3-mm adapter
- Foam + silicon tips
Disclaimer:
This review is intended to provide information for reading purposes only. It does not advice, nor constitute any solicitation or endorsement for any purchase. Any purchase you make is done at your own risk and full discretion. Please be informed that impression written in this review is relatively subjective. Sound impression was obtained based upon what I hear, using the default stock cable, and Aune M1s digital audio player. Please keep in mind, that your impression and usage experience may vary. The Unique Melody MASON 2 universal in-ear monitor was purchased by me as a part of my personal collection. I am not affiliated with Unique Melody, nor Mix Wave. All rights reserved.
Build quality:
The MASON 2 is built with a high-quality acrylic shell, enclosing its 12 BA drivers and their wiring. These 12 BA drivers are allotted for the following frequencies; 4 x Low, 4 x Mid, 2 x High, 2 x Super-high.
It has four bores constructed. These quad bores consist of three smaller ones, and one bigger. The MASON 2 uses recessed 2-pin sockets as its connectors.
At the back of each faceplates, you can find two open ports incorporated beside the 'Unique Melody' and 'MASON' logo. These newly added twin vent holes, mainly help to optimize air flow of the monitors. So to enhance the performance of the open/vented BA drivers within them.
Furthermore, the MASON 2 uses platinum-plated metal for its sound conduit/tubes. This is claimed to maintain a better sonic quality as it's transmitted through from the drivers.
I received one cable as a part of the MASON 2 accessory. The stock cable is very light and ergonomic. Suitable for use on the go.
Sound quality:
Upon first listen, I was greeted with a quiet, silent background. The MASON 2 is a rather source-tolerant IEM, not very sensitive to hisses. Even plugged directly to my laptop, or phone, the hiss is very minimal.
Stage dimension is wide and deep. It is exceptionally spacious and open. Imaging of each note is clear. As they're skillfully positioned and layered in the stage. Each instrument has fair spacing apart to one another. The stage is a bit warm, but quite airy. Instruments I hear sound neatly coherent, even in congested tracks. Background is clean, somewhat transparent, and overall highly immersive.
MASON 2's tonality is fairly neutral, with the bass enhanced. It has quite a natural, and balanced tonality. Kind of warm, smooth, and non-fatiguing. I haven't hear any excessive peaks or sibilance so far using this IEM.
Resolution and detail retrieval are very good, given its slightly warm stage. Instruments are well-defined, in accordance to their real counterpart. Although it is not overly-analytical, the MASON 2 is pretty realistic and tonally accurate.
Bass has a good extension, it goes deep and is quite powerful. It has a bit of dynamic character, and energy. But with a faster, more controlled BA speed. Sub-bass is good, it reaches low, and rumbles well. Mid-bass is dense, tight, and full of energy. All in all, the bass on the MASON 2 is resolved, and positively satisfying.
Midrange is neutral with a high resolution and tonal accuracy. Despite not being the most precise, the MASON 2 generates a rather pleasant, natural timbre. You can hear it especially in the acoustic and vocal department. The MASON 2 has a good tonal balance between warmth and clarity. Note density is neither too thick nor lean. Each having good imaging, layer, and definition.
Upper-mid region has this smooth, controlled tone. That is never sharp or sibilant. There is a slight lift which adds for an extra clarity to the whole sound spectrum.
Treble of the MASON 2 extends pretty far, rolling off at 13-14 kHz. This provides for much of the airiness, transparency, and detail to the overall sound. It has a forgiving smooth tone that is very natural, gentle, and clear.
 |  |
 |  |
Comparison:
Oriolus 2 ($800, Hybrid; 1 DD x Low, 1 BA x Low, 1 BA x Mid, 1 BA x High) :
Both IEMs have an overall smooth, and clear tonality. Oriolus 2 has a smaller stage dimension in comparison. Which is mainly due to its warmth, and note size. The MASON 2 on the other hand, has a cleaner, more transparent background. Mainly as a result of its resolution, and clarity.
They both present a rather warm atmosphere, with rich, and dynamic sound. The Oriolus 2 has a weightier note size due to its larger bass. This makes for a more engaging, fun listen with some genres.
The instrument notes are both relatively full-bodied. Oriolus 2 however has less space in their layering, and separation. Creating a more crowded, less coherent stage.
Bass is pretty similar for both IEMs. Depth is almost equal, the Oriolus 2 being deeper. Surprising; given their different driver source (i.e. DD x BA). Oriolus 2 still, has slightly more impact width from its dynamic driver. Albeit with the expense of less control, and slower decay/transient. You can feel the reverberation and its interaction with the stage. The Oriolus 2 has a voluptuous bass that you can feel rumbling. While MASON 2 has a quicker bass, with finer resolution. Both similarly are very satisfying.
Midrange are both pretty natural, smooth, and clear. The MASON 2 with its tonality, and resolution. While the Oriolus 2 with its warmth, and increased upper-mid. Oriolus 2 has a slightly warmer air, and as a result less detail. The MASON 2 is more detailed, and tonally accurate.
They both have a lift in the upper-mid frequency. With Oriolus 2 a sharper one, and MASON 2 a gentler one. Sensitive listeners may find the Oriolus 2 upper-mid a bit overwhelming sometimes (e.g. cymbal, snares).
MASON 2's treble extension is longer in comparison. This creates an airier stage that is more transparent than Oriolus 2. The Oriolus 2 has a peakier, more fatiguing treble that is not as forgiving as MASON 2.
Noble Kaiser Encore ($1850, 10 BA):
K10E has a bit more width, and height in its dimension. The stage feels more spacious and airier, due to its lean/lighter note size. The MASON 2 however is deeper, and has better layering ability. K10E can be highly transparent. But it's pretty sensitive, so you'll need to select the right source.
K10E is brighter, colder, and more analytical. It displays as neutral, but with more bump in mid-bass, and upper-mid frequency. The MASON 2 feels warmer, smooth, and more natural. The K10E, sounds more precise, and detailed. It is bright, and cleaner. While the MASON 2 sounds lively, and more engaging. Still, both have good resolution, and imaging.
Bass on the K10E is boosted more in the mid-section. While its sub-section can be found lacking in volume. The MASON 2 has a more satisfying overall bass. Its bass extends deeper, more voluminous, and dynamic. That being said, the K10E's leaner bass has better control, and quicker speed.
Midrange is highlighted more in the K10E. It has a brighter presentation which exposes a lot of micro-details. Notes are leaner and more articulate. While the MASON 2 has a better balance between warmth, and clarity. This balance, allows the MASON 2 to produce notes with a more natural timbre that is closer to reality. They both have good technical abilities, with the K10E excelling in separation, and transparency.
Upper-mid, or lower-treble is both the K10E's strength, and also its weakness (at least for me). It has this distinct lift in it, which is good for providing clarity to the whole sound. But also unpleasant for some sensitive listeners. The MASON 2 has a smoother, less-fatiguing tone. It displays better control in this area.
Both treble extends very well. They both recreate details nicely.
PlusSound X8 Gold-plated Silver + Copper | http://plussoundaudio.com/customcables/inearmonitor.html
About: (from the site)
X8 Series Custom Cable:
"Popular 8-wire cable for maximum sound quality and performance."
"
Our X8 series doubles the wires, sound, and build of our Exo by using EIGHT high quality custom designed UPOCC stranded wires with durable and flexible polyethylene outer insulation which are braided to provide better quality sound while reducing low range and interference noises. Most unique feature is the option of creating hybrids - combining two different wires with different sound qualities, making this is the ideal solution for finding the perfect sound you have been looking for. Selecting Type 6 Litz wires will prevent electrical anomalies such as skin effect and proximity effect, in addition to preventing oxidation by applying a special enamel coating to individually insulate every strand for long lasting sound quality and appearance. The multiple proprietary dampening cores function to reduce vibration - keeping conductivity constant throughout for the best quality sound. All wires are cryogenically treated to strengthen the structure of the wires for maximum durability and performance. Constructed with the highest quality components make this the very best performing and quality interchangeable cable on the market.
Overall Length: 4 ft / 48 in / 1219.2 mm / 121.92 cm
Wire Size: 26 American Wire Gauge (AWG)
Wire Type: UP-OCC
Wire Construction: Type 6 Litz
Estimated Build Time: 20 Business Days / 4 Weeks
"
Gold-plated Hybrid Wiring:
"
First of its kind wire featuring 50% 24K gold plated silver and 50% 24K gold plated copper wires bundled in enamel-coated groups inside for decreasing electrical anomalies (i.e. skin and proximity effect) but prevents oxidation to maintain same appearance after very long use, increases durability greatly, and sound quality improvements through its configuration. A semi-conductive material is added at the core of each strand group (total of 7 cores), to retain round shape while staying on the surface of the conductor, reducing mechanical vibration in the process. Utilizing PE insulation for flexibility and durability and wires are cryogenically treated for long lasting, enhanced sound quality. It transmits electric signals faster than ever with much less distortion and electrical resistance. Along with no crystal boundaries and molecular junctions, these advantages makes it the most advanced wire available for audio.
"
Splitter:
"
Anodized Aluminum
We offer a variety of cable stopper designs, built from the ground up. Lightweight, compact, and durable. Available in two configurations:
- Housing has been sized accordingly to work specifically for our custom cables.
- Made our of CNC machined anodized aluminum.
- Added 3-layer design for sleek appearance and improved durability.
- Dual gold screws hidden inside for keeping cable from moving.
- Every component of splitter is cryogenically treated BEFORE it is assembled for optimal durability.
"
2-pin:
"
Cryo Treated CIEM
- High conductive pure gold plated copper pins.
- All new heat resistant PEEK insulation for optimal durability.
- Special screw design to prevent connector and shell from ever coming off due to repeated insertion and removal.
- Shell is made of thick black aluminum, allowing clean signal flow and preventing RFI/EMI.
- Every component of plug is cryogenically treated BEFORE it is assembled for optimal durability and sound.
"
3.5-mm:
"
- High quality base metal for better conductivity.
- New screw design.
- Solder tabs, tips, and body are surface plated with gold or rhodium.
- Housing has been replaced with black anodized aluminum, allowing clean signal flow and preventing RFI/EMI.
- Extended jack for easier connection with devices that have cases.
- Heat resistant insulator, separated contact layout, and 6.5mm exit hole for better quality sound and build.
- Embossed design for better grip of inserting and removing plug.
- Every component of plug is cryogenically treated BEFORE it is assembled for optimal durability and sound.
"
Disclaimer:
This review is intended to provide information for research purposes only. It does not advice, nor constitute any solicitation or endorsement for any purchase. Any purchase you make is done at your own risk and full discretion. Please be informed that impression written in this review is relatively subjective. Please keep in mind, that your impression and usage experience may vary. The PlusSound X8 Gold-plated Silver + Copper cable was purchased by me as a part of my personal collection. I am not affiliated with PlusSound Audio. All rights reserved.
Build quality:
The PlusSound X8 Gold-plated Silver + Copper (GPSC), is composed and built with 8 wires which are woven together in a neatly braided round pattern. It has quite a mesmerizing uniform pattern and colours.
There are three patterns available for the main body of the X8 model; Square, Round, and Flat. And two braiding patterns after the splitter, for the left and right part; Round, and Flat. All customizable in the website's customization page.
The 8 wires are made out of 4 gold-plated silver, and 4 copper; type 6 litz, 26 AWG wires. They are split by a cool-to-the-touch anodized aluminium splitter. The cable that I have, comes with a rubber-like plastic slider to help secure on the head. You can customize yours when ordering, with a selection of wooden and aluminium sliders beside plastic.
This cable may seem a bit bulky, but it actually is lighter than it looks. Even though it has 8 wires, it's approximately only two or three times heavier than stock cable. Furthermore, this cable doesn't have memory wiring.
One of the downside of the X8 I've discovered, is its unsuitability for use on the go. Due to its rather unwieldy body, the X8 isn't very fit to be used walking or in a mobile environment. Also, the X8 GPSC sadly, is not the most affordable cable. That being said, a difference in cable material or model selection from the website could help.
Connectors on the X8 GPSC cable (i.e. the 2-pin and 3.5-mm jack) are applied very securely. The X8 that I have uses double heatshrinks to help minimize bends and movements between the cable and connectors.
Overall, the X8 GPSC cable quality is superb. After using it for many hours, for more than a couple of weeks, the cable remains spotlessly immaculate. It never feel flimsy. And there hasn't been any form of oxidation or coloration in the wiring so far.
Sound quality:
EDIT: No significant difference found.
Switching from the stock cable, the first thing I noticed the cable provides is a quieter background. Further improvisation of signal quality can also be felt from the slight increase in resolution of sound. This in turn aid in creating a clearer and more focused imaging.
Soundstage presentation feels cleaner, and airier. Each musical notes sounds a bit more defined. Instruments also feels like they produce a slightly more articulate sound.
The brightness from the lighting of this cable creates a unique sense of transparency. It is not a very clear cold analytical form of lighting, but more of a rather warm subtle one.
The X8 GPSC cable slightly balance and smooth peaks throughout the upper frequency, making listening felt less fatiguing than with the stock cable. To me it felt like it furnishes a more pleasant sound presentation.
In the lows, mid-bass notes feels a little denser, and more resolute. The impact of the punch feels deep, and tighter. Sub-bass decay feels a bit slower, and more natural than with stock cable.
In the midrange, the sound feels it's gaining a bit more warmth, and clarity. Texture of each notes I hear sound a bit full, weighty, and better-defined. It may be lush, and more resolving compared to the stock cable.
Additionally, the upper-frequency increase in density, judging from each of their notes.
About: (from the site)
X8 Series Custom Cable:
"Popular 8-wire cable for maximum sound quality and performance."
"
Our X8 series doubles the wires, sound, and build of our Exo by using EIGHT high quality custom designed UPOCC stranded wires with durable and flexible polyethylene outer insulation which are braided to provide better quality sound while reducing low range and interference noises. Most unique feature is the option of creating hybrids - combining two different wires with different sound qualities, making this is the ideal solution for finding the perfect sound you have been looking for. Selecting Type 6 Litz wires will prevent electrical anomalies such as skin effect and proximity effect, in addition to preventing oxidation by applying a special enamel coating to individually insulate every strand for long lasting sound quality and appearance. The multiple proprietary dampening cores function to reduce vibration - keeping conductivity constant throughout for the best quality sound. All wires are cryogenically treated to strengthen the structure of the wires for maximum durability and performance. Constructed with the highest quality components make this the very best performing and quality interchangeable cable on the market.
Overall Length: 4 ft / 48 in / 1219.2 mm / 121.92 cm
Wire Size: 26 American Wire Gauge (AWG)
Wire Type: UP-OCC
Wire Construction: Type 6 Litz
Estimated Build Time: 20 Business Days / 4 Weeks
"
Gold-plated Hybrid Wiring:
"
First of its kind wire featuring 50% 24K gold plated silver and 50% 24K gold plated copper wires bundled in enamel-coated groups inside for decreasing electrical anomalies (i.e. skin and proximity effect) but prevents oxidation to maintain same appearance after very long use, increases durability greatly, and sound quality improvements through its configuration. A semi-conductive material is added at the core of each strand group (total of 7 cores), to retain round shape while staying on the surface of the conductor, reducing mechanical vibration in the process. Utilizing PE insulation for flexibility and durability and wires are cryogenically treated for long lasting, enhanced sound quality. It transmits electric signals faster than ever with much less distortion and electrical resistance. Along with no crystal boundaries and molecular junctions, these advantages makes it the most advanced wire available for audio.
"
Splitter:
"
Anodized Aluminum
We offer a variety of cable stopper designs, built from the ground up. Lightweight, compact, and durable. Available in two configurations:
- Housing has been sized accordingly to work specifically for our custom cables.
- Made our of CNC machined anodized aluminum.
- Added 3-layer design for sleek appearance and improved durability.
- Dual gold screws hidden inside for keeping cable from moving.
- Every component of splitter is cryogenically treated BEFORE it is assembled for optimal durability.
"
2-pin:
"
Cryo Treated CIEM
- High conductive pure gold plated copper pins.
- All new heat resistant PEEK insulation for optimal durability.
- Special screw design to prevent connector and shell from ever coming off due to repeated insertion and removal.
- Shell is made of thick black aluminum, allowing clean signal flow and preventing RFI/EMI.
- Every component of plug is cryogenically treated BEFORE it is assembled for optimal durability and sound.
"
3.5-mm:
"
- High quality base metal for better conductivity.
- New screw design.
- Solder tabs, tips, and body are surface plated with gold or rhodium.
- Housing has been replaced with black anodized aluminum, allowing clean signal flow and preventing RFI/EMI.
- Extended jack for easier connection with devices that have cases.
- Heat resistant insulator, separated contact layout, and 6.5mm exit hole for better quality sound and build.
- Embossed design for better grip of inserting and removing plug.
- Every component of plug is cryogenically treated BEFORE it is assembled for optimal durability and sound.
"
Disclaimer:
This review is intended to provide information for research purposes only. It does not advice, nor constitute any solicitation or endorsement for any purchase. Any purchase you make is done at your own risk and full discretion. Please be informed that impression written in this review is relatively subjective. Please keep in mind, that your impression and usage experience may vary. The PlusSound X8 Gold-plated Silver + Copper cable was purchased by me as a part of my personal collection. I am not affiliated with PlusSound Audio. All rights reserved.
 |  |
Build quality:
The PlusSound X8 Gold-plated Silver + Copper (GPSC), is composed and built with 8 wires which are woven together in a neatly braided round pattern. It has quite a mesmerizing uniform pattern and colours.
Which remind me of:
There are three patterns available for the main body of the X8 model; Square, Round, and Flat. And two braiding patterns after the splitter, for the left and right part; Round, and Flat. All customizable in the website's customization page.
The 8 wires are made out of 4 gold-plated silver, and 4 copper; type 6 litz, 26 AWG wires. They are split by a cool-to-the-touch anodized aluminium splitter. The cable that I have, comes with a rubber-like plastic slider to help secure on the head. You can customize yours when ordering, with a selection of wooden and aluminium sliders beside plastic.
This cable may seem a bit bulky, but it actually is lighter than it looks. Even though it has 8 wires, it's approximately only two or three times heavier than stock cable. Furthermore, this cable doesn't have memory wiring.
One of the downside of the X8 I've discovered, is its unsuitability for use on the go. Due to its rather unwieldy body, the X8 isn't very fit to be used walking or in a mobile environment. Also, the X8 GPSC sadly, is not the most affordable cable. That being said, a difference in cable material or model selection from the website could help.
Connectors on the X8 GPSC cable (i.e. the 2-pin and 3.5-mm jack) are applied very securely. The X8 that I have uses double heatshrinks to help minimize bends and movements between the cable and connectors.
Overall, the X8 GPSC cable quality is superb. After using it for many hours, for more than a couple of weeks, the cable remains spotlessly immaculate. It never feel flimsy. And there hasn't been any form of oxidation or coloration in the wiring so far.
Sound quality:
EDIT: No significant difference found.
Soundstage presentation feels cleaner, and airier. Each musical notes sounds a bit more defined. Instruments also feels like they produce a slightly more articulate sound.
The brightness from the lighting of this cable creates a unique sense of transparency. It is not a very clear cold analytical form of lighting, but more of a rather warm subtle one.
The X8 GPSC cable slightly balance and smooth peaks throughout the upper frequency, making listening felt less fatiguing than with the stock cable. To me it felt like it furnishes a more pleasant sound presentation.
In the lows, mid-bass notes feels a little denser, and more resolute. The impact of the punch feels deep, and tighter. Sub-bass decay feels a bit slower, and more natural than with stock cable.
In the midrange, the sound feels it's gaining a bit more warmth, and clarity. Texture of each notes I hear sound a bit full, weighty, and better-defined. It may be lush, and more resolving compared to the stock cable.
Additionally, the upper-frequency increase in density, judging from each of their notes.
rantng
What happened to the sound quality portion of this review? It has been edited.
ranfan
I'm now no longer sure whether the sound difference I found was true or not. Factoring my subjective perception, and human memory. I cannot say for sure, it wasn't easily noticeable by me. Perhaps it was a placebo, or maybe there was a slight difference?
rantng
Ok, definitely appreciate the edit. Still a very informative review nevertheless, with lots of info. Thank you.
