phnx90
Head-Fier
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2008
- Posts
- 51
- Likes
- 10
Quote:I too found Bioshock Infinite to be a little disappointing on the gameplay front. Bioshock 2 actually did this best.
Incidentally, I still think Bioshock 2 is criminally underrated. I blame circlejerking for this to some degree, but the over emphasis on "new". Bioshock 1 may have been fresh, but on a gameplay front, it was extremely clunky and almost ruined the experience for me. It might as well have been a Telltale-style interactive story.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I guess that is why there is the old adage about opinions. Bio:1 Revolutionary and along with Splinter Cell a justifiable reason for having bought a Xbox. Bio:2 complete and utter letdown (wasn't aware of it at the time but now I can see Ken Levine missing really affecting the game), Bio:3 GOTY and an all time favorite.
I should play through Bioshock 2 again. I remember it being a letdown atmospheric and story wise, but not a bad game per se. Also interested about Minerva's Den as I've never played it, but heard great things about it. I also think Infinite's DLC were better than the actual main game.
Gameplay-wise Bioshock 2 was by far the smoothest. It's no Call of Duty as far as gunplay goes, but it is the smoothest out of the three. Infinite only really brought about the skyhook and true ADS but it was not dissimilar to the original in my opinion.
As far as story goes, I think the good ending of Bioshock 2 hit me the hardest, because the tale is far more personal in nature than are 1 and 3. While I did enjoy the sci-fi elements of Infinite extremely appealing, I think the pacing didn't quite work for me. It was too sudden, and left me wondering whether I had finished the game or not (even if in hindsight, it was pretty obvious).
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk