Earbuds Round-Up
Sep 17, 2017 at 12:28 PM Post #23,026 of 75,409
D'accord! ...i'd also like to try out moondrop nameless & Toneking tp16! - i'm just listening to K's 300 - which sound great with balanced output...having slightly recessed mids but are good to contrast buds with the same housing e.g: TY Hi-Z HP-150s - whose powerful bass, slightly shrill treble & very forward mids become more refined & controlled.....after a substantial burn-in :)
I have both the moondrop nameless and Toneking Tp16. Both are great earbuds.

I received my toneking tomahawk days ago, on first listen I think it sounds similar to the cheaper tp16. Both tonekings are very engaging to listen to. Nameless is a great addition to my arsenal, they are significantly smaller than the MX500s.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sep 17, 2017 at 1:06 PM Post #23,027 of 75,409
I have both the moondrop nameless and Toneking Tp16. Both are great earbuds.

I received my toneking tomahawk days ago, on first listen I think it sounds similar to the cheaper tp16. Both tonekings are very engaging to listen to. Nameless is a great addition to my arsenal, they are significantly smaller than the MX500s.

tp16 vs emx500 please?
 
Sep 17, 2017 at 1:14 PM Post #23,028 of 75,409
Nameless is a great addition to my arsenal, they are significantly smaller than the MX500s.

Happy to hear this. I have Nameless coming...this week maybe. I was hoping they would be smaller than my Monk+
 
Last edited:
Sep 17, 2017 at 4:40 PM Post #23,029 of 75,409
MoonDrop Nameless:

www.aliexpress.com/…/2017-Newest-MoonDrop-…/32830971670.html

I've had the pleasure of listening to these over the last few days. Clear, light and forgiving.

I've never tried any of the other MoonDrop earbuds, so my thoughts are just standalone about the Nameless.

Let me start off by saying that the packaging it is really unique and very attractive. Inside you will find a few extra foam covers and a brown carrying bag. Accessories are kept on the minimal, but overall packaging still makes for a nice unboxing experience.

The Sound Signature is focused on details and not on bass. The best part is while they might be light on thump, they are not bright. They roll off just before things could get tiresome. The highs and mids get the most attention with the Nameless. Great for types of music that lean towards vocals. Soundstage is wide and airy.

The build is interesting. VERY light weight from the housing to the thinner cable. The housings are extremely comfortable and are barely noticeable when in use. The cable is just a tad sticky, but I still like it very much as it does not seem prone to tangle.

Overall nice Earbuds for the price.

P1090655.jpg


P1090653.jpg


P1090652.jpg


P1090651.jpg


--
 
Sep 17, 2017 at 4:54 PM Post #23,030 of 75,409
Sep 18, 2017 at 12:56 AM Post #23,033 of 75,409
Hey @ClieOS, could you please share some impressions about the NiceHCK DIY Graphene?
Slightly bright, really good detail. Fast speed / transient, but a bit low in decay. As a result, bass doesn't go as deep as it can. It is kind of how I'll like to describe PT15. However, still a really good sounding earbud overall.

Is the DIY Graphene considered a sidegrade or upgrade to the PT15?

Also, same question with the Moondrop Nameless.

I am also interested in which of the 3 have the better soundstage, I listen to classical if that matters. Thanks.
 
Sep 18, 2017 at 1:51 AM Post #23,034 of 75,409
Happy to hear this. I have Nameless coming...this week maybe. I was hoping they would be smaller than my Monk+
My guts tell me it is a lot smaller than Monk+.

Right out of the box, Nameless has crystal-clear mid and high. It is spelled out in the manual that 100 hours of burn-in at moderate volume and for less than 10 hours per cycle is ideal for the earbuds. For that reason I do not want to elaborate more on the sound.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sep 18, 2017 at 9:14 AM Post #23,035 of 75,409
Is the DIY Graphene considered a sidegrade or upgrade to the PT15?

Also, same question with the Moondrop Nameless.

I am also interested in which of the 3 have the better soundstage, I listen to classical if that matters. Thanks.

DIY Graphene and PT15 share a lot of common traits, so yes, I'll say they are much more like sidegrade of each other than upgrade

Compared to PT15 / DIY Graphene, Nameless is tuned a littler smoother overall. But as far as overall sound quality goes, they are more or less at around the same level. Nameless is mainly a more relaxing earbud to listen to while PT15 / DIY Graphene are more aggressive i, their presentation.

All three are decent for Classical, through I won't say anyone of them can be considered as a Classical specialist. I am more inclined to recommend you to spend a little bit more for VX Pro instead.
 
Sep 18, 2017 at 12:37 PM Post #23,039 of 75,409
k's earbud samsara...hmmm is it worth the extra price for the new cable?
Don't know against k 500 but
I received them 2 days ago. Coming from Shozy BK At first I found them too bassy for my tasting . Shozy sound more natural to my ears while Samsara impressed me with sub bass and sound like big can IMHO It really depends what you re looking for.
 
Sep 18, 2017 at 12:58 PM Post #23,040 of 75,409
Okay, so there's a couple of buds in my collection that I like, but don't love. The two are the Vido and the NiceHCK EB200. In some ways, they share a similar DNA. They are both competent buds with a good representation of the full spectrum of sound. Bass represented (very well), Mids good and clear (sufficient), and present enough treble to round out a good balanced sound. My only problem with them is that I consider them to be a bit "dull" sounding. Most likely because the bass section (which is very present) sort of bleeds and floods the sound a bit. I had been thinking about what I could do to mod these things to better suit my tastes. I came up with (and maybe not a new idea) to reverse wire the drivers. I've read that it makes no difference and does no harm to your speakers or amp. The only difference being that when the driver should be pushing outward, instead it pulls inwards. My thinking was that, because of the flimsiness of the driver film, an inward pull would probably create a "tighter" hit than an outward push. I don't know if any of that turns out to be truth in fact. But the results are in and they are very good. A tighter and more impactful bass attack. Less bloat from the bass into the other frequencies which creates a better and more separated space. You can sort of now feel the bassnotes in your throat and acoustic notes become more flavorful. It does not do anything harmful to the other frequencies, if anything, it makes them sound better too. This must be what many modders do to make a run of the mill driver more punchy and distinct. So, maybe I've cracked a nut...
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top